Malunion of the distal radius

A laboratory comparison of computer navigation and individualized guides for distal radius osteotomy

PURPOSE

This article presents the results of a multiuser, randomized laboratory trial comparing the accuracy and precision of image-based navigation against individualized guides for distal radius osteotomy (DRO).

METHODS

Six surgeons each performed four DROs using image-based navigation and four DROs using individualized guides in a laboratory setting with plastic phantom replicas of radii from patients who had received DRO as treatment for radial deformity. Time required and correction errors of ulnar variance, radial inclination, and volar tilt were measured.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in the average correction errors. There was a statistically significant difference in the standard deviation of ulnar variance error (2.0 mm for navigation vs. 0.6 mm for guides). There was a statistically significant difference in the standard deviation of radial inclination error ([Formula: see text] for navigation vs. [Formula: see text] for guides). There were statistically significant differences in the times required (705 s for navigation vs. 214 s for guides) and their standard deviations (144 s for navigation vs. 98 s for guides).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to navigated DRO, individualized guides were easier to use, faster, and produced more precise correction of ulnar variance and radial inclination. The combination of true three-dimensional planning, ease of use, and accurate and precise corrective guidance makes the individualized guide technique a promising approach for performing corrective osteotomy of the distal radius.

Clinical and biomechanical investigation of an increased articular cavity depth after distal radius fractures: effect on range of motion, osteoarthrosis and loading patterns

INTRODUCTION

After fracture, distal radius malunion with dissociation of the volar and dorsal ulnar fracture fragments can lead to an increased articular cavity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

To investigate its clinical impact we retrospectively analyzed the outcome of 81 patients and simulated this form of malunion in a biomechanical experiment with six cadaver specimens in a dynamic loading set-up.

RESULTS

In clinics, a higher arthritis stage was significantly correlated with an increased articular cavity depth and an increased anterioposterior distance. In cadaver specimens, a significantly decreased range of motion and significantly altered intraarticular contact characteristics were recognized for an increased cavity.

CONCLUSION

Alterations in contact biomechanics could be one reason for the higher incidence of posttraumatic osteoarthritis when a deeper central impaction of the distal radius is present. From a clinical and experimental point of view, restoration of the normal shape of the distal radius is considered to minimize the risk for posttraumatic radiocarpal osteoarthritis.

Correction of extra-articular distal radius malunions using an anatomic radial plate

Malunion is a debilitating complication of a distal radius fracture. The malunion often requires a corrective osteotomy to restore the stability and joint congruity about the distal radius, a procedure which offers tremendous benefits in terms of pain, strength, and functionality. Here we describe a unique technique to address the malunion of an extra-articular distal radius fracture using a radial anatomic plate. This is a simple and reproducible method of fixation involving straightforward anatomy, which does not require excessive radiography, and which represents an excellent choice of fixation in the distal radius malunion.

Isolated ulnar shortening osteotomy for the treatment of extra-articular distal radius malunion

PURPOSE

To report the clinical outcomes and complications for a cohort of patients who had extra-articular distal radius malunions treated with isolated ulnar-shortening osteotomy (USO). A second purpose was to define the dorsal angulation limit that would still result in clinical and functional improvement after isolated USO for distal radius malunion. We postulated that patients with up to 20° dorsal or volar tilt could be successfully treated with isolated USO.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review for all patients who had an isolated USO for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome after distal radius malunion between January 1990 and December 2011. A total of 18 patients underwent isolated USO after distal radius malunion. The mean age of the patients was 53 years and the mean duration of follow-up was 34 months. We used Wilcoxon signed-rank tests to compare preoperative and postoperative range of motion; pain; Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores; and radiographic measurements.

RESULTS

Average intraoperative ulna shortening was 5.6 mm. Average flexion-extension arc improved from 79° preoperatively to 105° postoperatively. Average pronation-supination arc improved from 121° preoperatively to 162° postoperatively. Average visual analog scale pain score improved from 4.1 to 1.9. Average Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score improved from 43 to 11.

CONCLUSIONS

This case series demonstrated a significant improvement in pain score and range of motion after isolated USO for distal radius malunion. Patients with up to 20° dorsal tilt and radial inclination as low as 2° demonstrated improved clinical and functional outcomes after isolated USO. Given the comparable functional outcomes with shorter operative times and lower complication rate requiring fewer secondary surgeries, isolated USO is an attractive alternative to distal radius osteotomy for the management of distal radius malunion in patients with up to 20° dorsal tilt.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Opening wedge osteotomy for distal radius malunion: dorsal or palmar approach?

Background There are various technical variations to consider when performing a corrective osteotomy of a distal radius malunion. We chose two of the more commonly reported techniques and compared the results of volar (palmar) osteotomy and fixation with dorsal osteotomy and fixation. Method Within a continuous cohort of patients who had undergone corrective osteotomy for a malunited Colles fracture, two groups could be identified retrospectively. In 8 patients a dorsal approach was used. A structural trapezoidal graft, subtending the amount of correction, was inserted into the osteotomy gap and stabilization was performed with a thin round-hole mini-fragment plate. In 14 patients a palmar approach and a palmar fixed-angle plate was used for correction of the malunion and for angular stable rigid fixation of the two fragments. The osteotomy gap was loosely filled with nonstructural cancellous bone chips. A retrospective comparison of the two groups was performed to see whether the outcome was affected by the use of either operative technique.The demographics, the preoperative amount of deformity, range of motion, pain, and force were comparable for both groups. All osteotomies healed without loss of correction. After a minimal follow-up of one year, radiographic appearance, objective functional parameters were assessed and subjective data (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand [DASH] score and special pain and function questionnaire) obtained. Results These data did not show statistical difference for the two groups except for the amount of final wrist flexion. This parameter was significantly better in patients who had palmar approaches and fixed-angle plates. Conclusion Corrective osteotomies of distal radius malunions can be done in either way. It might result in some better flexion, if performed volarly.

Corrective osteotomy of distal radial deformities: a new method of guided locking fixed screw positioning

Corrective osteotomy for distal radial malunion is a valuable but at times technically challenging operation. We have developed a new device to aid in the performance of the operation. We compared clinical use of the new technique with the standard technique. In 11 patients treated with the new technique the volar locking plate needed repositioning only once. With the standard technique in 17 patients the plate was repositioned in nine cases and needed bending in six cases. The new method corrected radial inclination (SD of 3° vs. 9°) and ulnar variance (SD of 0.9 mm vs. 1.4 mm) more predictably than the standard technique but there was no advantage in correction of volar tilt (SD of 6° vs. 4°). In our experience the new device makes corrective osteotomy of the distal radius easier and more reliable.

The biomechanical effects of a deepened articular cavity during dynamic motion of the wrist joint

BACKGROUND

A deepened articular cavity of the distal radius due to a metaphyseal comminution zone is associated with early osteoarthritis and reduced joint motion. As this deformity has not been investigated biomechanically, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of a deepened articular cavity on contact biomechanics and motion range in a dynamic biomechanical setting.

METHODS

Six fresh frozen cadaver forearms were tested in a force controlled test bench during dynamic flexion and extension and intact mean contact pressure and contact area as well as range of motion were evaluated. Malunion was then simulated and intraarticular as well as motion data were obtained. Intact and malunion data were compared for the scaphoid and lunate facet and the total radial joint surface.

FINDINGS

Due to malunion simulation, cavity depth increased significantly. Motion decreased significantly to 54-69% when compared to the intact state. Malunion simulation led to a significant decrease of contact area in maximum extension for all locations (by ~50%). In maximum flexion and neutral position, contact area decrease was significant for the scaphoid fossa (by 51-54%) and the total radial joint surface (by 47-50%). Contact pressure showed a significant increase in maximum extension in the scaphoid fossa (by 129%).

INTERPRETATION

Already a small cavity increase led to significant alterations in contact biomechanics of the radiocarpal joint and to a significant range of motion decrease. This could be the biomechanical cause for degenerative changes after the investigated type of malunion. We think that restoration of the normal distal radius shape can minimize osteoarthritis risk post trauma and improve radiocarpal motion.

Radiographs late in the follow up of uncomplicated distal radius fractures: are they worth it? Clinical outcome and financial implications

Fractures of the distal radius are common. Displacement can quickly lead to secondary osteoarthritis. Early follow up radiographs are subsequently paramount to facilitate for early attempts at reduction. Developing callus eventually makes this impractical. In the absence of complications we propose that radiographs may become obsolete at the later stages of follow up. We investigate whether clinical deformity, range of wrist movement and grip strength are independent of radiographs taken later than 2 weeks into the follow up of uncomplicated cases. Local cases between May 2009 and December 2011 were reviewed. Devised criteria regulated case selection. Data was collected from radiological software and occupational therapy clinical notes. Fractures were placed in short or term follow up groups dependant on whether they were imaged later than 2 weeks into follow up. T-tests compared our outcomes measures between these groups. 138 cases were included; 77 short term; 61 long term. No cases reported visible clinical deformity. There were no significant differences between grip strength or range of wrist movement for the short and long term groups. No cases required intervention for late displacement. Although complications may justify delayed imaging, our results suggest radiographs late in the follow up of uncomplicated distal radius fractures have no impact on our outcome measures. Further studies are required to confirm this. Financial regulation means any potential benefits from the removal of these unnecessary radiographs should be recognised. Established radiological follow up regimes need to be devised.

Clinical outcomes of corrective osteotomy for distal radial malunion: a review of opening and closing-wedge techniques

BACKGROUND

Radial corrective osteotomy is an established but challenging treatment for distal radial malunion. There is ongoing discussion over whether an opening or closing-wedge osteotomy should be employed. The purpose of the present study was to retrospectively compare the clinical and radiographic results of conventional opening-wedge osteotomy with those of our closing-wedge technique.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated forty-two patients with extra-articular distal radial malunion who were managed with corrective osteotomy and were followed for a minimum of one year. Twenty-two patients were managed with radial opening-wedge osteotomy and interpositional bone graft or bone-graft substitute, and twenty were managed with simultaneous radial closing-wedge and ulnar shortening osteotomy without bone graft. The selection of the surgical procedure was determined by the surgeon. Each patient was evaluated on the basis of objective radiographic measurements and functional outcomes as determined on the basis of clinical examination, including range of wrist motion, grip strength, pain-rating score, Mayo wrist score, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score.

RESULTS

The mean duration of follow-up was thirty-six months (range, twelve to 101 months) for the opening-wedge cohort and twenty-eight months (range, twelve to eighty-seven months) for the closing-wedge cohort. The two techniques were comparable in terms of complications. Postoperative volar tilt and ulnar variance improved significantly compared with the preoperative status in each cohort (p < 0.05). Restoration of ulnar variance to within defined criteria (-2.5 to 0.5 mm) was significantly more frequent in the closing-wedge cohort than in the opening-wedge cohort (p < 0.001). The postoperative mean extension-flexion arc of the wrist (p < 0.001) and Mayo wrist score (p = 0.008) were significantly better in the closing-wedge cohort. Differences between the two cohorts in terms of the pronation-supination arc, grip strength, pain-rating score, and DASH scores were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The closing-wedge osteotomy technique is an effective reconstructive procedure for the treatment of extra-articular distal radial malunion. It is significantly better than the opening-wedge osteotomy technique in terms of the restoration of ulnar variance, the extension-flexion arc of wrist motion, and the Mayo wrist score.

What are the radiological predictors of functional outcome following fractures of the distal radius?

The fracture most commonly treated by orthopaedic surgeons is that of the distal radius. However, as yet there is no consensus on what constitutes an 'acceptable' radiological position before or after treatment. This should be defined as the position that will predict good function in the majority of cases. In this paper we review the radiological indices that can be measured in fractures of the distal radius and try to identify potential predictors of functional outcome. In patients likely to have high functional demands, we recommend that the articular reconstruction be achieved with less than 2 mm of gap or step-off, the radius be restored to within 2 mm of its normal length, and that carpal alignment be restored. The ultimate aim of treatment is a pain-free, mobile wrist joint without functional limitation.

Computer-assisted versus non-computer-assisted preoperative planning of corrective osteotomy for extra-articular distal radius malunions: a randomized controlled trial

Background

Malunion is the most common complication of distal radius fracture. It has previously been demonstrated that there is a correlation between the quality of anatomical correction and overall wrist function. However, surgical correction can be difficult because of the often complex anatomy associated with this condition. Computer assisted surgical planning, combined with patient-specific surgical guides, has the potential to improve pre-operative understanding of patient anatomy as well as intra-operative accuracy. For patients with malunion of the distal radius fracture, this technology could significantly improve clinical outcomes that largely depend on the quality of restoration of normal anatomy. Therefore, the objective of this study is to compare patient outcomes after corrective osteotomy for distal radius malunion with and without preoperative computer-assisted planning and peri-operative patient-specific surgical guides.

Methods/Design

This study is a multi-center randomized controlled trial of conventional planning versus computer-assisted planning for surgical correction of distal radius malunion. Adult patients with extra-articular malunion of the distal radius will be invited to enroll in our study. After providing informed consent, subjects will be randomized to two groups: one group will receive corrective surgery with conventional preoperative planning, while the other will receive corrective surgery with computer-assisted pre-operative planning and peri-operative patient specific surgical guides. In the computer-assisted planning group, a CT scan of the affected forearm as well as the normal, contralateral forearm will be obtained. The images will be used to construct a 3D anatomical model of the defect and patient-specific surgical guides will be manufactured. Outcome will be measured by DASH and PRWE scores, grip strength, radiographic measurements, and patient satisfaction at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.

Discussion

Computer-assisted surgical planning, combined with patient-specific surgical guides, is a powerful new technology that has the potential to improve the accuracy and consistency of orthopaedic surgery. To date, the role of this technology in upper extremity surgery has not been adequately investigated, and it is unclear whether its use provides any significant clinical benefit over traditional preoperative imaging protocols. Our study will represent the first randomized controlled trial investigating the use of computer assisted surgery in corrective osteotomy for distal radius malunions.

Trial registration

NCT01193010

Treatment of extra-articular distal radial malunions with an intramedullary implant

PURPOSE

Malunited distal radius fractures pose considerable problems, especially for young, active individuals. Surgical correction with osteotomy, bone grafting, and internal fixation with plates and screws has been the treatment of choice. Locked intramedullary fixation is an alternative technique to provide bony stability while minimizing soft tissue irritation in the management of acute distal radius fractures, with acceptable clinical results. The purpose of this study was to describe our experience with the use of an intramedullary device combined with grafting to repair distal radial malunions. This fixation device is inserted through the radial styloid and obtains distal fixation with 3 fixed-angle locking screws.

METHODS

Thirteen patients underwent distal radius malunion repair with an intramedullary implant and grafting. There were 6 male and 7 female participants with an average age of 51 years (range, 18-72 y). Patients were evaluated at an average follow-up of 24 months (range, 13-38 mo). Clinical outcome was measured by range of motion of the wrist and forearm, and grip strength, and by using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. We analyzed radiographs to determine time to union and adequacy of correction.

RESULTS

All of the malunions healed, with an average time to healing of 11 weeks. Patients' average range of motion at follow-up was 56 degrees of flexion, 66 degrees extension, 85 degrees pronation, and 84 degrees supination. Mean grip strength was 83% of the unaffected side, and the average Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 21. Radiographs taken on the latest follow-up showed correction to the following average parameters: 20.6 degrees radial inclination, 11.0 mm radial height, +1.0 mm ulnar variance, and 2.1 degrees volar tilt.

CONCLUSIONS

The technique presented in this report demonstrates the effectiveness of an intramedullary nail combined with bone graft or graft substitute in repairing malunited fractures of the distal radius. The results show reliable correction of the deformity and good functional outcomes.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Evaluation of corrective osteotomy of the malunited distal radius on midcarpal and radiocarpal malalignment

PURPOSE

To quantify 2 patterns of carpal malalignment, midcarpal malalignment (type 1) and radiocarpal malalignment (type 2), and to evaluate the effect of distal radius osteotomy on these malalignment patterns.

METHODS

In a retrospective review, we studied 31 wrists treated with corrective osteotomy for distal radius malunion after Colles' fracture, in 31 patients (mean age, 44 y). The patients were divided on the basis of effective radiolunate flexion (ERLF) into 2 patterns of carpal malalignment as measured on preoperative radiographs. There were 20 patients with midcarpal malalignment (ERLF < or = 25 degrees ) and 11 with radiocarpal malalignment (ERLF > 25 degrees ). Measurements of alignment were repeated after distal radius osteotomy and compared with preoperative values.

RESULTS

Both groups had correction of radial tilt and ulnar variance with distal radius osteotomy. In the midcarpal malalignment group, carpal alignment improved to normal parameters. In the radiocarpal malalignment group, we observed a notable effect on the ERLF. Neither age of the subject nor delay between fracture and osteotomy correlated with improvement in carpal alignment.

CONCLUSIONS

Distal radial osteotomy is a reliable technique for correction of the deformity at the distal end of the radius and both radiocarpal and midcarpal malalignment.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Functional outcomes after arthroplasty of the distal radioulnar joint and hand therapy: a case series

The purpose was to present a therapy protocol for use after implantation of an ulnar head endoprosthesis and to describe the functional outcomes after hand therapy. This is a retrospective review of a series of eight patients treated with a specified therapy protocol after ulnar head resection and implant arthroplasty. Marked improvements in pain and function were reported, though some pain with exertion remained. Two patients were on worker's compensation and both have returned to their premorbid work status. Functional use of the extremity was achieved by two to six weeks, with a mean of four weeks. Maximum medical improvement with good-to-excellent early results was achieved in all patients by 16 weeks. It is our experience that with this directed therapy protocol patients undergoing this procedure experience rapid recovery and an ability to return to activities of daily living in a timely manner. This paper provides a baseline protocol and rationale for use with patients who have undergone surgery with an ulnar head endoprosthesis.

Corrective osteotomy for deformity of the distal radius using a volar locking plate

Dorsally angulated malunions of the distal radius have historically been corrected with an opening wedge osteotomy fixed with a dorsal plate. Volar locking plates may facilitate a less morbid approach to corrective osteotomies of the wrist. Eight consecutive patients with an average age of 40 years (range, 15-52 years) underwent correction of a distal radius deformity through a volar approach. Clinical follow-up averaged 17.4 months (range, 7-41 months). Preoperative radiographs revealed an average of 24 degrees of dorsal tilt in patients with dorsal deformity. Postoperatively, their average measurement was <3 degrees of volar tilt. Patients were initially ulnar-positive with an average of 4 mm ulnar-positive variance (range, 2-7 mm). This corrected to less than 1 mm postoperatively. Postoperative disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH), SF-12, and Mayo Wrist scores averaged 10.8, 40.5, and 82.5, respectively. There were no nonunions, and no plates required removal. Distal radius deformity can be effectively addressed through a volar approach with the use of a locking plate.