Rare Though Not Mutually Exclusive: A Report of Three Cases of Concomitant KRAS and BRAF Mutation and a Review of the Literature

Detection of the BRAF V600E mutation in colon carcinoma: critical evaluation of the imunohistochemical approach

Recently BRAF V600E mutant-specific antibody (clone VE1) became available to immunohistochemically pinpoint the occurrence of these BRAF-mutant proteins in different tumors, such as colon carcinoma. Detection of BRAF mutations is important for the accurate application of targeted therapy against BRAF serine-threonine kinase activation. In this study, we evaluated 113 colon carcinomas including 95 primary and 27 metastatic tumors with the VE1 antibody using Leica Bond-Max automated immunohistochemistry. To ensure comprehensive BRAF V600E mutation detection, all cases were evaluated using 4 molecular methods (Sanger sequencing, the Cobas 4800 BRAF V600 Mutation Test, BRAF V600 allele-specific polymerase chain reaction, and BRAF V600 quantitative polymerase chain reaction) with nearly 100% concordance. Molecular and immunohistochemical studies were blinded. Furthermore, all cases were evaluated for KRAS and NRAS mutations as parameters mutually exclusive with BRAF mutations offering parallel evidence for BRAF mutation status. Strong to moderate VE1 positivity was seen in 34 tumors. Twelve colon carcinomas showed weak VE1 immunohistochemical staining, and 67 were entirely negative. An identical c.1799T>A single nucleotide substitution leading to the BRAF V600E mutation was identified in 27 of 113 (24%) colon carcinomas. A majority of BRAF-mutant tumors were located in the right side of the colon and had mismatch-repair deficiency. V600E mutation-negative carcinomas were more often sigmoid tumors and usually showed intact mismatch-repair proteins and KRAS or NRAS mutations. The sensitivity and specificity of positive results (strong to moderate staining) of VE1 immunohistochemistry were 85% and 68%, respectively. If any positivity would be considered, then the specificity declined to 51% with no significant improvement of sensitivity. Therefore, only strong positivity should be considered when using the VE1 antibody and Leica Bond-Max automated immunohistochemistry with these parameters. Although VE1 antibody can be useful in the screening of colon carcinomas for BRAF V600E-mutant proteins, molecular genetic confirmation is always necessary for mutation diagnosis.

Clinical meaning of BRAF mutation in Korean patients with advanced colorectal cancer

AIM: To evaluate the clinicopathological features of colorectal cancer (CRC) with a v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) mutation and its molecular interaction with microsatellite instability (MSI) and v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) in patients with advanced CRCs.

METHODS: From October 2009 to December 2011, 141 patients with stage III (n = 51) or IV (n = 90) CRCs who were tested for the BRAF mutation at Severance Hospital were included. Among 141 patients, five were excluded due to follow-up loss. Therefore, 136 patients were included in the study. The clinicopathological data, MSI status, and KRAS/BRAF mutation status were reviewed retrospectively. In addition, to evaluating the value of BRAF mutation status, progression-free survival and overall survival in all patients were collected and compared between the BRAF wild-type group and BRAF mutation group.

RESULTS: Of 136 patients, 80 (58.8%) were male and the mean age was 59 years. BRAF and KRAS mutations were detected in 9.6% and 35.3% of patients, respectively. Only 4.3% of patients had MSI-high tumors and there were no MSI-high in tumors with a BRAF mutation. BRAF mutations tended to be more frequent in stage IV than in stage III (11.76% vs 5.88%, P = 0.370). Patients with a BRAF mutation had a lower incidence of KRAS mutation than those without (7.69% vs 38.21%, P = 0.033). Overall survival was significantly shorter in the BRAF mutation group than in the BRAF wild-type group both by univariate analysis (P = 0.041) and multivariate analysis (HR = 2.195; 95%CI: 1.039-4.640; P = 0.039), while progression-free survival was not different according to BRAF mutation status.

CONCLUSION: CRCs with a BRAF mutation have distinct molecular features and resulted in a poor prognosis in Korean patients with advanced CRC.