Use of sonography for rapid identification of esophageal and tracheal intubations in adult patients

Transtracheal ultrasound for verification of endotracheal tube placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Early confirmation of endotracheal tube placement is of paramount importance to prevent hypoxia and its catastrophic consequences. Despite certain limitations, capnography is considered the gold standard to evaluate the proper placement of an endotracheal tube. Ultrasound is a novel tool with some definitive advantages over capnography. It enables a real-time view and can be performed quickly; furthermore, it is independent of pulmonary blood flow and does not require lung ventilation. In this review, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of transtracheal ultrasound in detecting endotracheal intubation.

SOURCE

We completed an extensive search of MEDLINE®, EMBASE™, The Cochrane Library, KoreaMed, LILACS, OpenGrey, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry from their inception to September 4, 2014. The studies that met the inclusion criteria were pooled and a meta-analysis was conducted.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Eleven studies and 969 intubations were included in the final analysis. Eight studies and 713 intubations were performed in emergency situations and the others were carried out in elective situations. Transtracheal ultrasonography's pooled sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were 0.98 (95% CI 0.97 to 0.99) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.95 to 0.99), respectively. In emergency scenarios, transtracheal ultrasonography showed an aggregate sensitivity and specificity of 0.98 (95% CI 0.97 to 0.99) and 0.94 (95% CI 0.86 to 0.98), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Transtracheal ultrasound is a useful tool to confirm endotracheal intubation with an acceptable degree of sensitivity and specificity. It can be used in emergency situations as a preliminary test before final confirmation by capnography.

Accuracy of a novel ultrasound technique for confirmation of endotracheal intubation by expert and novice emergency physicians

Introduction

Recent research has investigated the use of ultrasound (US) for confirming endotracheal tube (ETT) placement with varying techniques, accuracies, and challenges. Our objective was to evaluate the accuracy of a novel, simplified, four-step (4S) technique.

Methods

We conducted a blinded, randomized trial of the 4S technique utilizing an adult human cadaver model. ETT placement was randomized to tracheal or esophageal location. Three US experts and 45 emergency medicine residents (EMR) performed a total of 150 scans. The primary outcome was the overall sensitivity and specificity of both experts and EMRs to detect location of ETT placement. Secondary outcomes included a priori subgroup comparison of experts and EMRs for thin and obese cadavers, time to detection, and level of operator confidence.

Results

Experts had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI = 72% to 100%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI = 77% to 100%) on thin, and a sensitivity of 93% (95% CI = 66% to 100%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI = 75% to 100%) on obese cadavers. EMRs had a sensitivity of 91% (95% CI = 69% to 98%) and of specificity 96% (95% CI = 76% to 100%) on thin, and a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI = 82% to 100%) specificity of 48% (95% CI = 27% to 69%) on obese cadavers. The overall mean time to detection was 17 seconds (95% CI = 13 seconds to 20 seconds, range: 2 to 63 seconds) for US experts and 29 seconds (95% CI = 25 seconds to 33 seconds; range: 6 to 120 seconds) for EMRs. There was a statistically significant decrease in the specificity of this technique on obese cadavers when comparing the EMRs and experts, as well as an increased overall time to detection among the EMRs.

Conclusion

The simplified 4S technique was accurate and rapid for US experts. Among novices, the 4S technique was accurate in thin, but appears less accurate in obese cadavers. Further studies will determine optimal teaching time and accuracy in emergency department patients.

Sonographic confirmation of intubation: comparison of 3 methods in a pig model

OBJECTIVES

Several recent studies have investigated methods to confirm endotracheal tube (ETT) placement with sonography, using diaphragmatic movement, lung sliding, and transtracheal visualization of the ETT. To our knowledge, no studies have directly compared these 3 methods. This study aimed to directly compare the test characteristics of these 3 methods to determine ETT placement. Additionally, we compared the time required to complete the sonographic examination and the performers' confidence in their findings.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective randomized single-blinded study. Twenty-five recently euthanized pigs were intubated either in the esophagus or trachea, for a total of 50 intubations. Each of the 3 sonographic methods of intubation confirmation was performed by sonographers of different skill levels. Sonographic findings, the time to findings, and confidence in findings were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 150 sonographic examinations were performed. There were no significant differences in the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, or accuracy for correct ETT placement between the 3 methods of intubation confirmation. On average, the transtracheal and thoracic methods were faster (12.5 and 14.0 seconds, respectively) than the diaphragmatic method (21.0 seconds; P < .01). There were no significant differences in operator confidence between the confirmation methods.

CONCLUSIONS

All 3 methods for determining ETT placement had similar test characteristics. Transtracheal and thoracic sonography were faster than diaphragmatic sonography for determining ETT placement in pigs.

Ultrasound: A novel tool for airway imaging

Context:

The scope of ultrasound is emerging in medical science, particularly outside traditional areas of radiology practice.

Aims:

We designed this study to evaluate feasibility of bedside sonography as a tool for airway assessment and to describe sonographic anatomy of airway.

Settings and Design:

A prospective, clinical study.

Materials and Methods:

We included 100 adult, healthy volunteers of either sex to undergo airway imaging systemically starting from floor of the mouth to the sternal notch in anterior aspect of neck by sonography.

Results:

We could visualize mandible and hyoid bone as a bright hyperechoic structure with hypoechoic acoustic shadow underneath. Epiglottis, thyroid cartilage, cricoid cartilage, and tracheal rings appeared hypoechoic. Vocal cords were visualized through thyroid cartilage. Interface between air and mucosa lining the airway produced a bright hyperechoic linear appearance. Artifacts created by intraluminal air prevented visualization of posterior pharynx, posterior commissure, and posterior wall of trachea.

Conclusions:

Ultrasound is safe, quick, noninvasive, repeatable, and bedside tool to assess the airway and can provide real-time dynamic images relevant for several aspects of airway management.

Ultrasonography for clinical decision-making and intervention in airway management: from the mouth to the lungs and pleurae

OBJECTIVES

To create a state-of-the-art overview of the new and expanding role of ultrasonography in clinical decision-making, intervention and management of the upper and lower airways, that is clinically relevant, up-to-date and practically useful for clinicians.

METHODS

This is a narrative review combined with a structured Medline literature search.

RESULTS

Ultrasonography can be utilised to predict airway difficulty during induction of anaesthesia, evaluate if the stomach is empty or possesses gastric content that poses an aspiration risk, localise the essential cricothyroid membrane prior to difficult airway management, perform nerve blocks for awake intubation, confirm tracheal or oesophageal intubation and facilitate localisation of tracheal rings for tracheostomy. Ultrasonography is an excellent diagnostic tool in intraoperative and emergency diagnosis of pneumothorax. It also enables diagnosis and treatment of interstitial syndrome, lung consolidation, atelectasis, pleural effusion and differentiates causes of acute breathlessness during pregnancy. Patient safety can be enhanced by performing procedures under ultrasound guidance, e.g. thoracocentesis, vascular line access and help guide timing of removal of chest tubes by quantification of residual pneumothorax size.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasonography used in conjunction with hands-on management of the upper and lower airways has multiple advantages. There is a rapidly growing body of evidence showing its benefits.

TEACHING POINTS

• Ultrasonography is becoming essential in management of the upper and lower airways. • The tracheal structures can be identified by ultrasonography, even when unidentifiable by palpation. • Ultrasonography is the primary diagnostic approach in suspicion of intraoperative pneumothorax. • Point-of-care ultrasonography of the airways has a steep learning curve. • Lung ultrasonography allows treatment of interstitial syndrome, consolidation, atelectasis and effusion.

The effect of sonologist experience on the ability to determine endotracheal tube location using transtracheal ultrasound

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Transtracheal ultrasound has been described as a method to evaluate endotracheal tube placement. Correlation between sonologist experience and the successful use of transtracheal ultrasound to identify endotracheal tube location has not been examined. Our objectives were to evaluate emergency physicians' ability to correctly identify endotracheal tube location using transtracheal ultrasound and to evaluate the role operator experience plays in successful identification of tube placement.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional, single-blinded study conducted in a cadaver laboratory. Two cadavers were used as models. One cadaver had an endotracheal tube placed in the esophagus, and the second had the tube placed in the trachea. Participants were asked to evaluate tube placement using transtracheal ultrasound and to record their interpretation. Examination clips were reviewed by the emergency ultrasound fellowship director. Descriptive statistics and χ(2) test were used for analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine participants were included, 8 (27.6%) of whom were considered to be "most experienced" based on previous ultrasound experience (>150 scans). Eleven of 29 correctly identified esophageal intubation and 18 of 29 correctly identified tracheal intubation, resulting in a sensitivity of 62.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 42.3-79.3) and a specificity of 37.9% (95% CI, 20.7-57.7). Transtracheal ultrasound performed by the most experienced sonologists showed better sensitivity and specificity, 75.0% (95% CI, 34.9-96.8) and 62.5% (95% CI, 24.5-91.5), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Most participants obtained adequate images, but correct interpretation of the images was poor. The most experienced sonologists correctly identified tube location more often. Additional education would be required before adopting this method.

Real-time tracheal ultrasonography for confirmation of endotracheal tube placement during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of tracheal ultrasonography for assessing endotracheal tube position during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).

METHODS

We performed a prospective observational study of patients undergoing emergency intubation during CPR. Real-time tracheal ultrasonography was performed during the intubation with the transducer placed transversely just above the suprasternal notch, to assess for endotracheal tube positioning and exclude esophageal intubation. The position of trachea was identified by a hyperechoic air-mucosa (A-M) interface with posterior reverberation artifact (comet-tail artifact). The endotracheal tube position was defined as endotracheal if single A-M interface with comet-tail artifact was observed. Endotracheal tube position was defined as intraesophageal if a second A-M interface appeared, suggesting a false second airway (double tract sign). The gold standard of correct endotracheal intubation was the combination of clinical auscultation and quantitative waveform capnography. The main outcome was the accuracy of tracheal ultrasonography in assessing endotracheal tube position during CPR.

RESULTS

Among the 89 patients enrolled, 7 (7.8%) had esophageal intubations. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of tracheal ultrasonography were 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 94.4-100%), 85.7% (95% CI: 42.0-99.2%), 98.8% (95% CI: 92.5-99.0%) and 100% (95% CI: 54.7-100%), respectively. Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 7.0 (95% CI: 1.1-43.0) and 0.0, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-time tracheal ultrasonography is an accurate method for identifying endotracheal tube position during CPR without the need for interruption of chest compression. Tracheal ultrasonography in resuscitation management may serve as a powerful adjunct in trained hands.

Dynamic anatomic relationship of the esophagus and trachea on sonography: implications for endotracheal tube confirmation in children

OBJECTIVES

Sonographic visualization of an empty esophagus to confirm endotracheal tube placement during intubation may be more reliable than identifying an endotracheal tube within the trachea. Our objective was to determine the frequency in which the normal empty esophagus can be identified at or below the level of the cricoid ring in children.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of children and young adults presenting to the emergency department were examined by sonography to determine the dynamic anatomic relationship of the trachea and esophagus at or below the level of the cricoid ring. For children with the esophagus behind or partially behind the trachea, cricoid pressure was applied using a linear array transducer to visualize the presence of lateral sliding of the esophagus from behind the trachea.

RESULTS

A total of 55 patients 21 years or younger were examined; 51% (28) were male. Sixty-two percent (34) had esophagi positioned partially to the left of the cricoid ring, 20% (11) completely to the left of the cricoid ring, 16% (9) behind the cricoid ring, and 2% (1) partially to the right of the cricoid ring. When cricoid pressure was applied using the ultrasound transducer, the esophagus was visualized lateral to the trachea in all patients (54 to the left and 1 to the right; n = 55 of 55; 95% confidence interval, 94%-100%).

CONCLUSIONS

With cricoid pressure applied using a linear transducer, the esophagus was visualized lateral to the trachea in all children and young adults. Visualizing an empty esophagus by point-of-care sonography may be feasible to confirm endotracheal tube placement by a process of elimination.

Ultrasonography in the management of the airway

In this study, it is described how to use ultrasonography (US) for real-time imaging of the airway from the mouth, over pharynx, larynx, and trachea to the peripheral alveoli, and how to use this in airway management. US has several advantages for imaging of the airway - it is safe, quick, repeatable, portable, widely available, and it must be used dynamically for maximum benefit in airway management, in direct conjunction with the airway management, i.e. immediately before, during, and after airway interventions. US can be used for direct observation of whether the tube enters the trachea or the esophagus by placing the ultrasound probe transversely on the neck at the level of the suprasternal notch during intubation, thus confirming intubation without the need for ventilation or circulation. US can be applied before anesthesia induction and diagnose several conditions that affect airway management, but it remains to be determined in which kind of patients the predictive value of such an examination is high enough to recommend this as a routine approach to airway management planning. US can identify the croicothyroid membrane prior to management of a difficult airway, can confirm ventilation by observing lung sliding bilaterally and should be the first diagnostic approach when a pneumothorax is suspected intraoperatively or during initial trauma-evaluation. US can improve percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy by identifying the correct tracheal-ring interspace, avoiding blood vessels and determining the depth from the skin to the tracheal wall.