Rosuvastatin in older patients with systolic heart failure

2009 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemia and prevention of cardiovascular disease in the adult - 2009 recommendations

The present article represents the 2009 update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemia and prevention of cardiovascular disease in the adult.

Statin therapy and risk of developing type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Although statin therapy reduces cardiovascular risk, its relationship with the development of diabetes is controversial. The first study (West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study [WOSCOPS]) that evaluated this association reported a small protective effect but used nonstandardized criteria for diabetes diagnosis. However, results from subsequent hypothesis-testing trials have been inconsistent. The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the possible effect of statin therapy on incident diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A systematic literature search for randomized statin trials that reported data on diabetes through February 2009 was conducted using specific search terms. In addition to the hypothesis-generating data from WOSCOPS, hypothesis-testing data were available from the Heart Protection Study (HPS), the Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) Study, the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT), the Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER), and the Controlled Rosuvastatin Multinational Study in Heart Failure (CORONA), together including 57,593 patients with mean follow-up of 3.9 years during which 2,082 incident diabetes cases accrued. Weighted averages were reported as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs using a random-effects model. Statistical heterogeneity scores were assessed with the Q and I(2) statistic.

RESULTS

In the meta-analysis of the hypothesis-testing trials, we observed a small increase in diabetes risk (RR 1.13 [95% CI 1.03-1.23]) with no evidence of heterogeneity across trials. However, this estimate was attenuated and no longer significant when the hypothesis-generating trial WOSCOPS was included (1.06 [0.93-1.25]) and also resulted in significant heterogeneity (Q 11.8 [5 d.f.], P = 0.03, I(2) = 57.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although statin therapy greatly lowers vascular risk, including among those with and at risk for diabetes, the relationship of statin therapy to incident diabetes remains uncertain. Future statin trials should be designed to formally address this issue.

Reverse epidemiology in systolic and nonsystolic heart failure: cumulative prognostic benefit of classical cardiovascular risk factors

BACKGROUND

Observational studies indicate that classical cardiovascular risk factors as body mass index, total cholesterol, and systolic blood pressure are associated with improved rather than impaired survival in heart failure ("reverse epidemiology"). We estimated the prognostic role of these risk factors in unselected patients with heart failure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive subjects with heart failure of any cause and severity were enrolled (n=867), and survivors were followed for a median period of 594 days (25th to 75th percentile, 435 to 840). Mean age was 70+/-13 years, 41% were female, New York Heart Association class distribution I through IV was 15%/29%/41%/15%, and 49% had preserved left ventricular ejection function. At follow-up, 34% of the patients had died. Low levels of any risk factor (ie, body mass index, total cholesterol, and systolic blood pressure in the low tertile) indicated the highest mortality risk. After adjustment for age, sex, New York Heart Association class, and ejection fraction, >/=2 risk factors in the high tertile indicated a relative reduction in mortality risk of 51% (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.68; P=0.001) compared with subjects with 3 risk factors in the low tertile. Further adjustment for cause of heart failure, relevant comorbidities, medication, and biomarkers attenuated this association only modestly (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.89; P=0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with heart failure, mortality risk counterintuitively increased on a cumulative scale with lower levels of body mass index, total cholesterol, and systolic blood pressure, irrespective of the type and severity of heart failure. Future studies need to identify whether risk factor control as presently recommended should be advocated in all patients with heart failure.

Discrepancy between results of randomized control studies and retrospective analysis: the case of statin therapy effect on one-year mortality in patients with decompensated heart failure

BACKGROUND

In view of the recent reports on a lack of protective effect of statin therapy on clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure, the present study investigated the impact of statin therapy before admission on one-year survival of patients hospitalized due to decompensated heart failure in two groups of patients; with and without ischemic heart disease.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of 887 consecutive patients older than 18 years hospitalized with decompensated heart failure between 11/December 2001 and 06/June 2005. Two groups of patients were compared: those who received statins within 3 months before the admission (S) and those who did not (NS). The primary outcome was one-year all-cause mortality. To adjust for a potential misbalance between S and NS groups in baseline characteristics, a propensity score for statin therapy was incorporated into the survival model.

RESULTS

Two hundred eighty-one patients (31.7%) received statins prior to admission. Patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) (656/887 subjects, 74%) had higher rate of S therapy as compared to the rest 36.3% vs. 18.6%, p<0.001. Overall one-year mortality rate in the S group was 21% vs. 31.8% in the NS group, p<0.001. In the subgroup of patients with IHD, statins were protective after adjustment for comorbidities and propensity score (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% CI 0.4-0.97), but in patients with non-ischemic HF statin therapy was not associated with a protective effect (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.38-1.6).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study statins' protective effect on one-year survival in HF patients is restricted to patients with IHD. This stands in disagreement with the results of the randomized trials showing no effect of statin therapy. Statin use may be a marker of better health care and despite an extensive adjustment for baseline characteristics, unaccounted bias inherent to retrospective studies may explain the discrepancy in the results.

Impact of a pure reduction in heart rate for the treatment of left ventricular dysfunction: clinical benefits of ivabradine in the BEAUTIFUL trial

Ivabradine is an I(f) current inhibitor, that has documented antianginal efficacy. The BEAUTIFUL trial tested ivabradine against placebo in a large population of 10,917 patients in sinus rhythm, with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction, defined as left ventricular ejection fraction < or =35%. Overall, there was no impact of ivabradine on the primary end-point of the trial (cardiovascular mortality, hospitalisation for myocardial infarction, new onset or worsening heart failure). In the placebo arm of the trial, baseline heart rate > or = 70 bpm was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, heart failure and coronary revascularisation. In the subgroup of patients with a baseline heart rate > or =70 bpm, treatment with ivabradine resulted in a significant, 36% reduction in the risk of myocardial infarction and a 20% reduction in the need for coronary revascularisation. Ivabradine was well tolerated, with an increased rate of treatment discontinuation, mainly due to bradycardia, compared with placebo. Because of its safety and efficacy to control angina, ivabradine should be considered first-line antianginal treatment in coronary artery disease patients with left ventricular dysfunction and increased heart rate, already receiving beta-blocker therapy or in whom these medications are not tolerated.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in older adults

Age-associated physiologic changes predispose older adults to develop heart failure, even when left ventricular ejection fraction is normal or near normal. Heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction is particularly common in older hypertensive women, and hypertension plays a key role in its pathophysiology. In contrast with heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction, the treatment of heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction has a limited empiric basis, although some basic principles are useful. Ongoing studies provide hope of improving care of these patients.

[Percutaneous aortic valve replacement - pro]

Percutaneous aortic valve replacement is presently on its way to revolutionize the current treatment practice for patients with degenerative aortic valve stenosis. Two different techniques are available: the balloon-expandable Edwards valve prosthesis and the self-expanding CoreValve ReValving prosthesis. After an initial learning curve as well as device modifications, use of the current generations has a > 95% success rate with a low peri- and post-interventional complication rate. In this article, an overview on the current status of this technique will be provided.

Rosuvastatin attenuates heart failure and cardiac remodelling in the ageing spontaneously hypertensive rat

3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl(HMG)-Coenzyme(Co)A reductase inhibitors such as rosuvastatin may improve clinical status in patients with hypertension and heart failure. The ageing spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) closely mimics the chronic heart failure disease process observed in humans. This study examined the structural and functional changes in the cardiovascular system of 15-month-old SHR and normotensive Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats treated with rosuvastatin (20 mg/kg/day perorally) for 24 weeks. Cardiovascular structure and function were monitored serially by echocardiography. At 21 months, ex vivo Langendorff, electrophysiological or histological studies were performed. Chronic rosuvastatin treatment attenuated elevations of left ventricular wet weight (mg/g body weight: 21-month WKY, 2.30 ± 0.04; 15-month SHR, 3.03 ± 0.08; 21-month SHR, 4.09 ± 0.10; 21-month SHR + rosuvastatin, 3.50 ± 0.13), myocardial extracellular matrix content (% left ventricular area: 21-month WKY, 7.6 ± 0.5; 15-month SHR, 13.2 ± 0.8; 21-month SHR 19.6 ± 1.0; 21-month SHR with rosuvastatin 14.6 ± 1.2) and diastolic stiffness (κ: 21-month WKY, 24.9 ± 0.6; 15-month SHR, 26.4 ± 0.4; 21-month SHR, 33.1 ± 0.8; 21-month SHR + rosuvastatin, 27.5 ± 0.6) as well as attenuating the deterioration of systolic and diastolic function (fractional shortening %: 21-month WKY, 66 ± 2; 15-month SHR, 51 ± 3; 21-month SHR, 38 ± 3; 21-month SHR + rosuvastatin, 52 ± 4). There was no effect on the increased systolic blood pressure, plasma low-density lipoprotein concentrations or the prolonged action potential duration. Thus, chronic rosuvastatin treatment may attenuate myocardial dysfunction in heart failure by preventing fibrosis.

Effect of rosuvastatin on cardiac remodeling, function, and progression to heart failure in hypertensive heart with established left ventricular hypertrophy

Hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) are the most common high-risk group to develop heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Recent reports have noted the favorable effect of statins on LVH. We evaluated the effect of rosuvastatin on cardiac remodeling, function, and progression to heart failure in a hypertensive rat model with established LVH. Dahl salt-sensitive rats were fed a high-salt diet until 13 weeks of age. After LVH was confirmed by echocardiography, rats were randomly assigned to control and statin treatment (n=18 each group). The statin-treated group was treated with rosuvastatin until 21 weeks of ages. Serial echocardiography, blood pressure monitoring, and miniaturized conductance catheter hemodynamic monitoring were performed at 21 weeks. Echocardiographic parameters were not significantly different between the groups. On hemodynamic monitoring, systolic performance parameters were similar between the groups, whereas end diastolic pressure-volume relationships were lower in the statin-treated group (0.014+/-0.008 versus 0.008+/-0.004 mm Hg/muL, P<0.05), suggesting improvement in myocardial stiffness. Pathological analysis showed attenuation of perivascular and interstitial fibrosis in the statin-treated group (P<0.02). Rosuvastatin therapy did not alleviate LVH in hypertensive rats with established LVH, but it attenuated myocardial fibrosis and LV stiffness. It seems that rosuvastatin has limited therapeutic value when used to prevent progression from LVH to heart failure in hypertensive hearts.

Beta-blockade with nebivolol in elderly heart failure patients with impaired and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: Data From SENIORS (Study of Effects of Nebivolol Intervention on Outcomes and Rehospitalization in Seniors With Heart Failure)

OBJECTIVES

In this pre-specified subanalysis of the SENIORS (Study of Effects of Nebivolol Intervention on Outcomes and Rehospitalization in Seniors With Heart Failure) trial, which examined the effects of nebivolol in elderly heart failure (HF) patients, we explored the effects of left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) on outcomes, including the subgroups impaired EF (< or =35%) and preserved EF (>35%).

BACKGROUND

Beta-blockers are established drugs in patients with HF and impaired EF, but their value in preserved EF is unclear.

METHODS

We studied 2,111 patients; 1,359 (64%) had impaired (< or =35%) EF (mean 28.7%) and 752 (36%) had preserved (>35%) EF (mean 49.2%). The effect of nebivolol was investigated in these 2 groups, and it was compared to explore the interaction of EF with outcome. Follow-up was 21 months; the primary end point was all-cause mortality or cardiovascular hospitalizations.

RESULTS

Patients with preserved EF were more often women (49.9% vs. 29.8%) and had less advanced HF, more hypertension, and fewer prior myocardial infarctions (all p < 0.001). During follow-up, the primary end point occurred in 465 patients (34.2%) with impaired EF and in 235 patients (31.2%) with preserved EF. The effect of nebivolol on the primary end point (hazard ratio [HR] of nebivolol vs. placebo) was 0.86 (95% confidence interval: 0.72 to 1.04) in patients with impaired EF and 0.81 (95% confidence interval: 0.63 to 1.04) in preserved EF (p = 0.720 for subgroup interaction). Effects on all secondary end points were similar between groups (HR for all-cause mortality 0.84 and 0.91, respectively), and no p value for interaction was <0.48.

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of beta-blockade with nebivolol in elderly patients with HF in this study was similar in those with preserved and impaired EF.

The gravity of JUPITER (Justification for the Use of Statins in Primary Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin)

In the recently published Justification for the Use of Statins in Primary Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) study, a large, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, rosuvastatin proved to be safe and remarkably effective in the setting of primary prevention. In patients without coronary heart disease or diabetes, with a baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level < 130 mg/dL and a C-reactive protein (CRP) > or = 2mg/L, a statin-induced LDL-C reduction of 50% reduced serious cardiac events by about 50%, including in women and the elderly, and also lowered all-cause mortality. The mean on-treatment LDL-C level (55 mg/dL) in the rosuvastatin arm of JUPITER was about in the mid-range of the physiologically normal levels. C-reactive protein screening should be considered, especially in patients without preexisting indications for statin therapy. In general, the CRP-lowering efficacy of statin therapy is directly and significantly correlated with its LDL-C-lowering activity. Simvastatin, at the 80-mg daily dose, is more toxic to muscles and liver than other statins at their highest dose, and thus should be used with caution.

Lipid management in the prevention of stroke: review and updated meta-analysis of statins for stroke prevention

Despite the inconsistent or weak association between cholesterol and stroke, lowering of cholesterol concentrations with statins reduces the risk of stroke in high-risk populations and in patients with non-cardioembolic stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Statin therapy is the most important advance in stroke prevention since the introduction of aspirin and antihypertensive treatments. Meta-analysis of randomised trials of statins in combination with other preventive strategies, including 165 792 individuals, shows that each 1 mmol/L (39 mg/dL) decrease in LDL cholesterol equates to a reduction in relative risk for stroke of 21.1% (95% CI 6.3-33.5, p=0.009). In secondary prevention of non-cardioembolic stroke, intense reduction of LDL cholesterol by statins also significantly reduced the risk of recurrent stroke (relative risk 0.84, 0.71-0.99, p=0.03) and major cardiovascular events (0.80, 0.69-0.92, p=0.002). Future directions include assessment of a target LDL cholesterol concentration of less than 1.8 mmol/L (70 mg/dL), the effects of triglyceride-lowering therapy alone or in combination with statins, and the effects of treatments to raise HDL cholesterol concentrations.

New data on the clinical impact of exercise training, fish oils, and statins in heart failure

Despite major advances in the field of cardiovascular (CV) diseases, heart failure (HF) continues to result in considerable CV morbidity and mortality and accounts for an increasing number of acute hospitalizations in adult patients. Recent major trials have focused on exercise training programs and the widely available nutraceutical omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids or fish oil and statins in patients with HF. In this article, we provide insight into the interpretation of the evidence base for these distinct interventions in HF and provide guidance for the clinical incorporation of exercise training and fish oil therapy for additional CV protection in chronic HF.

Diabetic cardiomyopathy--a distinct disease?

Diabetic individuals have a significantly increased likelihood of developing cardiovascular disease. Whilst part of this association is explained by the presence of concomitant risk factors, large epidemiological studies have consistently reported diabetes as a strong risk factor for the development of heart failure after adjusting for such covariates. This has resulted in the notion that there is a distinct cardiomyopathy specific to diabetes, termed 'diabetic cardiomyopathy'. The natural history is characterized by a latent subclinical period, during which there is evidence of diastolic dysfunction and left ventricular hypertrophy, before overt clinical deterioration and systolic failure ensue. These clinical findings have been supported by a growing body of experimental data which support the notion that diabetes inflicts a direct insult to the myocardium, with cellular, structural and functional changes manifest as the diabetic myocardial phenotype. Several of these mechanisms appear to work in unison, forming complicated reciprocal pathways of disease. Reactive oxygen species and alterations in intracellular calcium homeostasis appear to play significant roles in many of these mechanisms. Determining the hierarchy of this cascade of disease will allow identification of the pathological trigger most responsible for disease. Translational research in this field is currently hindered by a lack of clinical studies and intervention trials specifically in patients with diabetic cardiomyopathy. Future clinical and experimental studies of accurate models of diabetic cardiomyopathy should help to define the true aetiology and lead to the development of specific pharmacotherapies for this condition, ultimately reducing the increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in diabetic patients.

Statins, ACE inhibitors and ARBs in cardiovascular disease

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the main cause of death in developed and developing countries. It is well accepted that several diseases - including hypertension, dyslipidemia and diabetes mellitus - increase CVD. More recently also chronic inflammatory diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, have been shown to accelerate CVD. This association further supports a responsible role for inflammatory processes in all stages of CVD pathophysiology. Clinically, CVD ranges through different acute and chronic syndromes with ischemic symptoms in distal tissues, including heart, cerebral region or peripheral arteries. Several treatments for reducing CVD are under investigation. In this review we focus on statins, angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARBs), updating therapeutic evidence from the last clinical trials with particular relevance to diabetic patients.

Clinical insights from the Treating to New Targets trial

The Treating to New Targets (TNT) trial enrolled 10,001 patients with coronary disease to treatment with atorvastatin, 80 or 10 mg/d, and observed them for a median of 4.9 years. Mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels were 77 mg/dL in the 80-mg group and 101 mg/dL in the 10-mg group. The primary end point, a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infraction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, and stroke, occurred in 10.9% of patients in the 10-mg and 8.7% of patients in the 80-mg group (P = .0002). In large subgroups of patients in TNT, specifically those with diabetes, the metabolic syndrome, chronic kidney disease, or previous coronary bypass (CABG) surgery, the risk of an event was significantly higher than in patients without these features. The absolute risk reduction in the 80-mg group was greater in each of these subgroups than in other TNT patients. The rates of stroke and hospitalization for heart failure were significantly lower in the more aggressively treated patients. A total of 18,696 patients have taken 80 mg of atorvastatin in clinical trials, usually for 4 to 5 years, with an excellent safety record. Pharmacoeconomic studies indicate that treatment with the 80-mg dose instead of the 10-mg dose almost costs neutral in US TNT-like patients (additional cost $181 for 5 years). In summary, wider use of the 80-mg dose of atorvastatin in patients with stable coronary disease is safe, cost-effective, and provides an incremental reduction in coronary events.

Comparative effect of atorvastatin (80 mg) versus simvastatin (20 to 40 mg) in preventing hospitalizations for heart failure in patients with previous myocardial infarction

We investigated whether intensive cholesterol lowering could more effectively prevent heart failure (HF) in secondary prevention. The IDEAL study was a 4.8-year prospective, randomized trial comparing "usual" simvastatin treatment (20 to 40 mg/day, n = 4,449) with high-dose atorvastatin (80 mg/day, n = 4,439) in patients with a history of myocardial infarction (MI). At baseline, 94% of patients (n = 8,351) had no history of HF. During the course of the trial, there were 222 new or recurrent hospitalizations for HF (57 and 165 in those with and without HF at baseline, respectively), 123 (2.8%) in the simvastatin group and 99 (2.2%) in the atorvastatin group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62 to 1.05, p = 0.11). After adjustments, atorvastatin 80 mg was associated with a 26% decrease of new HF events compared with simvastatin 20 to 40 mg (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.97, p = 0.03). Atorvastatin tended to be associated with fewer HF events in those with HF at baseline (n = 537, HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.11, p = 0.11) and those without HF at baseline (n = 8,351, HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.09, p = 0.15). Also, HF without preceding MI (n = 187) was decreased (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.97, p = 0.03). In conclusion, atorvastatin 80 mg was more efficient than simvastatin 20 to 40 mg in preventing development of HF in patients with previous MI.

The relationship between reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by statins and reduction in risk of cardiovascular outcomes: an updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In 2005, the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration (CTTC) quantified the relationship between reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) achieved by statin treatment and reduction in cardiovascular risk. Since this publication, several large statin trials have been reported.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our analysis was to extend the CTTC results by including active-controlled trials and other trials published since 2005.

METHODS

A literature search in English (1966-December 2008) was undertaken of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Derwent drug file databases, and the Cochrane library using standard MESH terms (cardiovascular disease, death, fatal outcome, pravastatin, simvastatin, atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, and hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors) to identify randomized trials of statins (placebo controlled, active controlled, or usual care) that reported clinical outcomes, enrolled >1000 subjects, and followed them up for > or =1 year. Random effects meta-regression was used to analyze the relationship between absolute changes in LDL-C and risk for cardiovascular events.

RESULTS

Twenty-five trials were included in a primary analysis involving 155,613 subjects, 6321 vascular deaths, 23,791 major vascular events, 11,357 major coronary events, and 4717 strokes. For every 25-mg/dL (0.65-mmol/L) reduction in LDL-C, the relative risk (95% CI) for various cardiovascular outcomes was as follows: vascular mortality, 0.89 (0.87-0.92); major vascular events, 0.86 (0.84-0.88); major coronary events, 0.84 (0.82-0.86); and stroke, 0.90 (0.86-0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on meta-regression analysis of these trials, there was a significant positive relationship between reduction in LDL-C and reduction in the risk for major cardiovascular events. These results support and extend the findings of the CTTC.

Update on statin-mediated anti-inflammatory activities in atherosclerosis

Anti-inflammatory activities of statins in atherosclerosis have been well documented by both basic research and clinical studies. Statins have been introduced in the 1980s as 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors to block cholesterol synthesis and lower cholesterol serum levels. In the last three decades, statins have been shown to possess several anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities resulting in the beneficial reduction of atherosclerotic processes and cardiovascular risk in both humans and animal models. Inflammatory intracellular pathways involving kinase phosphorylation and protein prenylation are modulated by statins. The same intracellular mechanisms might also cause statin-induced myotoxicity. In the present review, we will update evidence on statin-mediated regulation of inflammatory pathways in atherogenesis.

Recent insights on chronic heart failure, cachexia and nutrition

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide recent observations on the interrelation between chronic heart failure (CHF), cachexia and human nutrition and updating epidemiological issues in CHF.

RECENT FINDINGS

Present evidence suggests that impairment in cardiac muscle energetics plays an important role in the pathogenesis of heart failure. New concepts such as microRNA expression are emerging as potential agents in heart failure. Recent research suggests mechanisms by which inflammatory catabolic states may persist in the presence of adequate growth factors and nutrition. A consensus panel has recently designed a definition for general cachexia and its stratification. Together with classicals, new nutrients and substrates are showing efficacies in the malnutrition associated with CHF. Although still promising, ghrelin, growth factors and other biological compounds maintain emergent therapeutical positions for heart failure or associated catabolic states or both.

SUMMARY

Altered intestinal function as an agent for CHF is rising in evidence. New techniques to well diagnose and stratify malnutrition and cardiac cachexia in CHF are needed. Treatment of cachexia in CHF appears to be a combination of different approaches, in which metabolic, nutritional, immunological and hormonal strategies may play an important role. Although the current experimental research is of great help, well designed randomized controlled trials are needed to test these hypothesis and generate clinical evidence.

Cardiovascular risk reduction: what do recent trials with rosuvastatin tell us?

Abundant evidence from large-scale clinical trials supports the importance of lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to decrease the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. The LDL-C targets in various guidelines remain important treatment goals but, even in trials where statin therapy achieves substantial reduction of LDL-C, a significant number of CVD events still occur and the residual risk remains high. These findings suggest that lipid parameters other than LDL-C, such as high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides, and LDL particle size, can influence the risk of CVD. On this basis, other strategies that can alter the lipid profile, in particular raising HDL.C, may provide additional benefits. Other factors such as HDL-C functionality and susceptibility to oxidation and inflammatory factors can also influence cardiovascular risk. In addition to the modifications of the lipid profile, statins have cholesterol-independent beneficial pleiotropic effects. The contribution of these effects to event reduction is not yet fully understood. Recently, the body of evidence has expanded to support the use of intensive statin therapy in broader patient populations. The JUPITER trial has shown the benefit of intensive statin treatment in low-risk subjects with high levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and average levels of LDL-C. Unlike the setting of primary and secondary prevention, the results of statin trials in patients with heart failure have shown no clear benefit in terms of survival. The recently published AURORA trial was carried out to investigate the effect of rosuvastatin in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing chronic hemodialysis. In this trial no benefit on cardiovascular events was shown with statin therapy. In conclusion, large outcomes trials have clearly shown that statin treatments have a favorable benefit/risk profile in a large range of patients at different levels of risk, with the exception of patients with heart failure and those with renal disease undergoing dialysis. Further evidence is needed on the role of therapeutic strategies on the so-called residual risk.

Effect of atorvastatin on cardiac remodelling and mortality in rats following hyperglycemia and myocardial infarction

Effect of HMGCoA Reductase Inhibitors on Cardiac Remodelling and Mortality in Rats. Following Hyperglycemia and Myocardial Infarction.

AIMS

The presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) increases mortality, due in part to the presence of known cardiovascular risk factors. However little is known about the impact of DM on cardiac remodelling and on clinical outcomes. We aimed to investigate whether hyperglycaemia may adversely and additionally affect LV remodelling post-MI, and whether the addition of a statin, known to reduce mortality both post MI and in humans with DM, has an effect on these outcomes.

METHODS

Eight week old Sprague-Dawley rats were allocated to 5 groups--control (non-DM)/sham, control-MI, DM-sham, DM-MI and DM-MI with statin gavage (DM-MI/ATV). Echocardiogram and invasive pressure volume analysis were performed prior to sacrifice for estimation of cardiac function. Tissue was analysed for total cardiac collagen, collagen I and III.

RESULTS

Hyperglycaemia in the remodelling period significantly increased mortality (70% survival in the C-MI group vs 27% in the DM-MI group), worsened cardiac function and increased fibrosis. All of these variables were attenuated by the addition of a statin.

CONCLUSION

Hyperglycaemia increased mortality in MI and exacerbated LV remodeling, and this was attenuated with statin use. This study confirms the importance of early and intensive treatment of hyperglycaemia in patients with MI and suggests that in humans with both DM and MI the addition of a statin may be beneficial.

Statins and cardiovascular diseases: from cholesterol lowering to pleiotropy

Statins are 3-hydroxy-3-methyglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, which are prescribed extensively for cholesterol lowering in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Recent compelling evidence suggests that the beneficial effects of statins may not only be due to their cholesterol lowering effects, but also, to their cholesterol-independent or pleiotropic effects. Through these so-called pleiotropic effects, statins are directly involved in restoring or improving endothelial function, attenuating vascular remodeling, inhibiting vascular inflammatory response, and perhaps, stabilizing atherosclerotic plaques. These cholesterol-independent effects of statins are predominantly due to their ability to inhibit isoprenoid synthesis, the products of which are important lipid attachments for intracellular signaling molecules, such as Rho, Rac and Cdc42. In particular, inhibition of Rho and its downstream target, Rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase (ROCK), has emerged as the principle mechanisms underlying the pleiotropic effects of statins. This review provides an update of statin-mediated vascular effects beyond cholesterol lowering and highlights recent findings from bench to bedside to support the concept of statin pleiotropy.

Different characteristics of chronic heart failure (CHF) in elderly diabetics and non-diabetics

Higher plasma concentrations of the N-terminal fragment of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) and the tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) have been observed in patients affected by chronic heart failure (CHF). Recent clinical studies have tried to correlate the plasma levels of these biomarkers with severity of the disease. To evaluate the role of NT-pro-BNP, TNF-alpha and C-reactive protein (CRP) in a population of geriatric patients affected by CHF, and to assess their different plasma levels in diabetics and in normoglycemic patients, we enrolled 57 patients affected by CHF: 29 patients were diabetic and 28 were normoglycemic. Clinical and echocardiographic examinations were performed in all patients, in order to evaluate the NYHA-class and the left ventricular ejection fraction (EF). All of them had been stabilized with medical therapy from at least 3 weeks. Plasma NT-pro-BNP, TNF-alpha and CRP levels were measured in each recruited patient. In the whole population we observed a linear correlation between NT-pro-BNP levels, EF and NYHA-class (p<0.05) but there was no significant correlation between TNF-alpha or CRP and the clinical or echocardiographic data (p=0.588 and p=0.9, respectively). Finally we evaluated, if there were significant differences in the biomarker concentrations between diabetics and normoglycemics. Both the clinical and the echocardiographic parameters of systolic dysfunction were comparable in these two groups. We observed a significant difference in CRP levels between the two groups (3.76+/-2.85 in diabetics vs. 1.42+/-2.35 in normoglycemics; p<0.001). The NT-pro-BNP levels were also higher in diabetics than in normoglycemic patients (12867.8+/-18042.0 vs. 6400.89+/-5655.0; p=0.07). Plasma TNF-alpha levels (23.03+/-11.52 vs. 23.31+/-12.0; p=0.93) and left ventricular EF (35.65+/-4.03 vs. 35.18+/-3.55; p=0.63) were similar in the two groups. In agreement with recent studies, we confirm a linear correlation between NT-pro-BNP, EF and the severity of disease in CHF patients. We also observed a greater cytokine activation in diabetics than in normoglycemic patients, demonstrating probably that in this group a greater inflammatory reaction is present.

Rosuvastatin and cardiovascular events in patients undergoing hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Statins reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events in patients at high cardiovascular risk. However, a benefit of statins in such patients who are undergoing hemodialysis has not been proved.

METHODS

We conducted an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, prospective trial involving 2776 patients, 50 to 80 years of age, who were undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. We randomly assigned patients to receive rosuvastatin, 10 mg daily, or placebo. The combined primary end point was death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. Secondary end points included death from all causes and individual cardiac and vascular events.

RESULTS

After 3 months, the mean reduction in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels was 43% in patients receiving rosuvastatin, from a mean baseline level of 100 mg per deciliter (2.6 mmol per liter). During a median follow-up period of 3.8 years, 396 patients in the rosuvastatin group and 408 patients in the placebo group reached the primary end point (9.2 and 9.5 events per 100 patient-years, respectively; hazard ratio for the combined end point in the rosuvastatin group vs. the placebo group, 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 1.11; P=0.59). Rosuvastatin had no effect on individual components of the primary end point. There was also no significant effect on all-cause mortality (13.5 vs. 14.0 events per 100 patient-years; hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.07; P=0.51).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing hemodialysis, the initiation of treatment with rosuvastatin lowered the LDL cholesterol level but had no significant effect on the composite primary end point of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00240331.)

Approach to the diagnosis and management of lipoprotein disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Disorders of lipoprotein metabolism are frequently encountered in clinical practice. Although the severe genetic hyperlipidemias are relatively infrequent, prompt recognition and treatment can prevent complications, such as atherosclerosis and pancreatitis. The secondary dyslipidemias, due to medication or other metabolic disorders (hypothyroidism, renal or hepatic diseases), must be identified and treated. With the growing epidemic of obesity, dyslipidemias are a component of the metabolic syndrome.

RECENT FINDINGS

The stratification of cardiovascular risk now includes family history and biomarkers of inflammation, especially high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, which enables sound clinical decision making. Lifelong hypercholesterolemia is strongly associated with increasing risk of atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease death, but the decision to treat pharmacologically depends on the absolute cardiovascular risk over the next 10 years. Clinical trial data support intensive treatment of patients at high cardiovascular risk or for the secondary prevention of recurrent coronary heart disease. The recently published JUPITER trial shows that patients with an elevated C-reactive protein benefit from treatment with a statin (rosuvastatin 20 mg) for primary prevention.

SUMMARY

The current guidelines for the prevention of coronary artery disease will continue to focus on the determination of global risk, with intensive treatment aimed at the high-risk group. Family history and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein provide additional risk stratification.

Should we treat all patients with coronary heart disease or the equivalent with statins?

Statins have proven benefit in preventing cardiovascular events and should be prescribed for almost all patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) or equivalent. However, evidence is lacking to support treating all such individuals. Potential exceptions include those in the initial days of acute coronary syndrome, those with symptomatic systolic heart failure, those with very low low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, diabetic patients without associated metabolic syndrome, and those with high CHD risk calculated mainly on the basis of advanced age. In these cases, the decision to prescribe statins depends on clinical judgment, and surrogate tests for CHD may be useful.

Canadian Cardiovascular Society Consensus Conference guidelines on heart failure, update 2009: diagnosis and management of right-sided heart failure, myocarditis, device therapy and recent important clinical trials

The Canadian Cardiovascular Society published a comprehensive set of recommendations on the diagnosis and management of heart failure in January 2006. Based on feedback obtained through a national program of heart failure workshops and through active solicitation of stakeholders, several topics were identified because of their importance to the practicing clinician. Topics chosen for the present update include best practices for the diagnosis and management of right-sided heart failure, myocarditis and device therapy, and a review of recent important or landmark clinical trials. These recommendations were developed using the structured approach for the review and assessment of evidence adopted and previously described by the Society. The present update has been written from a clinical perspective to provide a user-friendly and practical approach. Specific clinical questions that are addressed include: What is right-sided heart failure and how should one approach the diagnostic work-up? What other clinical entities may masquerade as this nebulous condition and how can we tell them apart? When should we be concerned about the presence of myocarditis and how quickly should patients with this condition be referred to an experienced centre? Among the myriad of recently published landmark clinical trials, which ones will impact our standards of clinical care? The goals are to aid physicians and other health care providers to optimally treat heart failure patients, resulting in a measurable impact on patient health and clinical outcomes in Canada.

Value of medical therapy in patients >80 years of age with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (EF) has a high prevalence in the geriatric population, and this cohort may be at risk of complications caused by polypharmacy. Effects of commonly used cardiac medications on long-term survival of patients >80 years with HF and preserved left ventricular EF were assessed. One hundred forty-two patients were evaluated. During a 5-year follow-up, 98 patients died (69%). There were no significant differences in baseline parameters in patients who died compared with those who survived at 5 years. None of the drug therapies appeared to make a significant difference in long-term survival, including beta blockers (p = 0.89), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers (p = 0.91), calcium channel blockers (p = 0.69), diuretics (p = 0.30), digoxin (p = 0.22), and statins (p = 0.32). In conclusion, based on the present data, it appears that use of certain common cardiac medications may not be associated with a significant effect on long-term survival in octogenarians with HF and preserved EF.