Distinct and essential roles of transcription factors IRF-3 and IRF-7 in response to viruses for IFN-alpha/beta gene induction

Role for p53 in gene induction by double-stranded RNA

Cross talk between p53 and interferon-regulated pathways is implicated in the induction of gene expression by biologic and genotoxic stresses. We demonstrate that the interferon-stimulated gene ISG15 is induced by p53 and that p53 is required for optimal gene induction by double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), but not interferon. Interestingly, virus induces ISG15 in the absence of p53, suggesting that virus and dsRNA employ distinct signaling pathways.

Constitutive IFN-alpha/beta signal for efficient IFN-alpha/beta gene induction by virus

Efficient IFN-alpha/beta gene induction in virus-infected cells is an event central to innate immunity, in which the transcription factor IRF-7 plays a critical role together with IRF-3. Unlike IRF-3, IRF-7 is short-lived and its gene expression is dependent on IFN-alpha/beta signalling; hence, the signal-dependent enhancement of IRF-7 gene induction during viral infection is essential for positive-feedback regulation of IFN-alpha/beta gene induction. Here, we provide evidence that constitutive, IRF-3/IRF-7-independent production of IFN-alpha/beta in uninfected cells is critical for setting the IRF-7 expression levels, determining whether or not the positive-feedback mechanism will operate effectively upon viral infection. In fact, spleen cells are more dependent than fibroblasts on this mechanism; the IFN-alpha/beta gene induction is impaired more severely by blocking the IRF-7 induction pathway than by introducing an IRF-3 null mutation. Thus, the constitutive IFN-alpha/beta signal provides a foundation for the IRF-7-mediated enhancement of its own production in response to virus infection.

Hantavirus infection induces the expression of RANTES and IP-10 without causing increased permeability in human lung microvascular endothelial cells

Sin Nombre virus (SNV) and Hantaan virus (HTN) infect endothelial cells and are associated with different patterns of increased vascular permeability during human disease. It is thought that such patterns of increased vascular permeability are a consequence of endothelial activation and subsequent dysfunction mediated by differential immune responses to hantavirus infection. In this study, the ability of hantavirus to directly induce activation of human lung microvascular endothelial cells (HMVEC-Ls) was examined. No virus-specific modulation in the constitutive or cytokine-induced expression of cellular adhesion molecules (CD40, CD54, CD61, CD62E, CD62P, CD106, and major histocompatibility complex classes I and II) or in cytokines and chemokines (eotaxin, tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin 1beta [IL-1beta], IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1, MIP-1alpha, and MIP-1beta) was detected at either the protein or message level in hantavirus-infected HMVEC-Ls. Furthermore, no virus-specific enhancement of paracellular or transcellular permeability or changes in the organization and distribution of endothelial intercellular junctional proteins was observed. However, infection with either HTN or SNV resulted in detectable levels of the chemokines RANTES and IP-10 (the 10-kDa interferon-inducible protein) in HMVEC-Ls within 72 h and was associated with nuclear translocation of interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF-3) and IRF-7. Gamma interferon (IFN-gamma)-induced expression of RANTES and IP-10 could also be detected in uninfected HMVEC-Ls and was associated with nuclear translocation of IRF-1 and IRF-3. Treatment of hantavirus-infected HMVEC-Ls with IFN-gamma for 24 h resulted in a synergistic enhancement in the expression of both RANTES and IP-10 and was associated with nuclear translocation of IRF-1, IRF-3, IRF-7, and NF-kappaB p65. These results reveal a possible mechanism by which hantavirus infection and a TH1 immune response can cooperate to synergistically enhance chemokine expression by HMVEC-Ls and trigger immune-mediated increases in vascular permeability.

Virus-specific activation of a novel interferon regulatory factor, IRF-5, results in the induction of distinct interferon alpha genes

Interferon regulatory factor (IRF) genes encode DNA-binding proteins that are involved in the innate immune response to infection. Two of these proteins, IRF-3 and IRF-7, serve as direct transducers of virus-mediated signaling and play critical roles in the induction of type I interferon genes. We have now shown that another factor, IRF-5, participates in the induction of interferon A (IFNA) and IFNB genes and can replace the requirement for IRF-7 in the induction of IFNA genes. We demonstrate that, despite the functional similarity, IRF-5 possesses unique characteristics and does not have a redundant role. Thus, 1) activation of IRF-5 by phosphorylation is virus-specific, and its in vivo association with the IFNA promoter can be detected only in cells infected with NDV, not Sendai virus, while both viruses activate IRF-3 and IRF-7, and 2) NDV infection of IRF-5-overexpressing cells preferentially induced the IFNA8 subtype, while IFNA1 was primarily induced in IRF-7 expressing cells. These data indicate that multiple signaling pathways induced by infection may be differentially recognized by members of the IRF family and modulate transcription of individual IFNA genes in a virus and cell type-specific manner.

The interferon system and interferon regulatory factor transcription factors -- studies from gene knockout mice

Interferon regulatory factors (IRFs) were initially identified as regulators of IFN-alpha/beta genes and to date nine members have been determined in human and mouse. They share a conserved DNA-binding domain in the N-terminal portion that recognizes similar DNA sequences. Despite their similar DNA binding specificity, the IRFs show diverse functions in response to extra cellular stimuli. Although the study of IRFs was started with respect to regulation of the IFN-alpha/beta gene expression, recent studies have revealed other aspects of IRF functions. In this review, we summarize our current knowledge of the functions of IRF family members revealed by our gene targeting study in mice, focusing on the regulation of the IFN system.

A weak signal for strong responses: interferon-alpha/beta revisited

Biological systems have acquired adaptability and robustness against rapid environmental changes. A typical example is the immune system, which eradicates invading pathogens such as viruses. Interferons alpha and beta, which are produced in response to viral infection, are essential components of this system but are also produced at low levels in the absence of infection. What is the purpose of the constitutive weak interferon-alpha/beta signal?

Gene Induction Pathways Mediated by Distinct IRFs during Viral Infection

During viral infection, interferon-alpha/beta (IFN-alpha/beta) and many IFN-inducible genes are induced to elicit antiviral responses of the host. Using cells with a gene disruption(s) for the IRF family of transcription factors, we provide evidence that these genes, containing similar IRF-binding cis-elements, are classified into distinct groups, based on the gene induction pathway(s). The IFN-beta gene induction is dependent on either IRF-3 or IRF-7, whereas induction of the IFN-alpha gene family is IRF-7-dependent. On the other hand, ISG15, ISG54 and IP-10 are induced by either IRF-3 or IFN stimulated gene factor 3 (ISGF3). We also show that another group of genes is totally dependent on ISGF3. Thus, during viral infection, a given gene responds either directly to a virus or virus-induced IFN-alpha/beta or both through distinct pathways. The differential utilization of these induction pathways for these genes during viral infection may reflect their distinct functional roles in the efficient antiviral response.

Induction of IRF-3/-7 kinase and NF-kappaB in response to double-stranded RNA and virus infection: common and unique pathways

BACKGROUND

Infection by virus or treatment with double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) results in the activation of transcription factors including IRF-3, IRF-7 and a pleiotropic regulator NF-kappaB by specific phosphorylation. These factors are important in triggering a cascade of antiviral responses. A protein kinase that is yet to be identified is responsible for the activation of these factors and plays a key role in the responses.

RESULTS

The signal cascade was analysed using sensitive assays for the activation of IRF-3 and NF-kappaB, and various inhibitors. We found that the activation of IRF-3 and NF-kappaB by dsRNA or virus involves a process that is sensitive to Geldanamycin. Although the induction of NF-kappaB by dsRNA/virus and TNF-alpha involves common downstream pathways including IKK activation, the upstream, Geldanamycin-sensitive process was unique to the dsRNA/virus-induced signal. By an in vitro assay using cell extract, we found an inducible protein kinase activity with physiological specificity of IRF-3 phosphorylation. Furthermore, the same extract specifically phosphorylated IRF-7 in a similar manner.

CONCLUSIONS

Double-stranded RNA or virus triggers a specific signal cascade that results in the activation of the IRF-3/-7 kinase we detected, which corresponds to the long-sought signalling machinery that is responsible for triggering the early phase of innate response. The signal branches to a common NF-kappaB activation cascade, thus resulting in the activation of a set of critical transcription factors for the response.

IRF3 and IRF7 phosphorylation in virus-infected cells does not require double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase R or Ikappa B kinase but is blocked by Vaccinia virus E3L protein

Induction of interferon-alpha (IFNalpha) gene expression in virus-infected cells requires phosphorylation-induced activation of the transcription factors IRF3 and IRF7. However, the kinase(s) that targets these proteins has not been identified. Using a combined pharmacological and genetic approach, we found that none of the kinases tested was responsible for IRF phosphorylation in cells infected with Newcastle disease virus (NDV). Although the broad-spectrum kinase inhibitor staurosporine potently blocked IRF3 and -7 phosphorylation, inhibitors for protein kinase C, protein kinase A, MEK, SAPK, IKK, and protein kinase R (PKR) were without effect. Both IkappaB kinase and PKR have been implicated in IFN induction, but cells genetically deficient in IkappaB kinase, PKR, or the PKR-related genes PERK, IRE1, or GCN2 retained the ability to phosphorylate IRF7 and induce IFNalpha. Interestingly, PKR mutant cells were defective for response to double-stranded (ds) RNA but not to virus infection, suggesting that dsRNA is not the only activating viral component. Consistent with this notion, protein synthesis was required for IRF7 phosphorylation in virus-infected cells, and the kinetics of phosphorylation and viral protein production were similar. Despite evidence for a lack of involvement of dsRNA and PKR, vaccinia virus E3L protein, a dsRNA-binding protein capable of inhibiting PKR, was an effective IRF3 and -7 phosphorylation inhibitor. These results suggest that a novel cellular protein that is activated by viral products in addition to dsRNA and is sensitive to E3L inhibition is responsible for IRF activation and reveal a novel mechanism for the anti-IFN effect of E3L distinct from its inhibition of PKR.

Downregulation of IRF-3 levels by ribozyme modulates the profile of IFNA subtypes expressed in infected human cells

As an early response to viral infection, cells express a number of cellular genes that play a role in innate immunity, including alpha/beta interferons (IFN). IFN-alpha/beta are encoded by a single IFNB gene and multiple, closely related IFNA genes. The induction of these IFN genes in infected cells occurs at the transcriptional level, and two transcription factors of the IRF family, IRF-3 and IRF-7, were shown to play a role in their activation. While the expression of IRF-3 alone was shown to be sufficient for induction of the IFNB gene, induction of all the IFNA subtypes in human cells required the presence of IRF-7. Since IRF-3 is expressed constitutively in all cells examined, the role of IRF-3 in the induction of IFNA genes has not been clarified. Using ribozyme targeted to IRF-3 mRNA, we found that the downregulation of IRF-3 levels in the infected cells inhibited not only the induction of IFNB gene but also the expression of IFNA genes. Furthermore, downmodulation of IRF-3 levels altered the expression profile of IFNA subtypes induced by viral infection. These studies suggest that the ratio between the relative levels of IRF-3 and IRF-7 is a critical determinant for the induction of the individual IFNA subtypes in infected cells.

Analysis of functional domains of interferon regulatory factor 7 and its association with IRF-3

IRF-7 plays an essential role in virus-activated transcription of IFNA genes. To analyze functional domains of IRF-7 we have constructed an amino-terminal deletion mutant of IRF-7 (237-514) which exerted a dominant negative (DN) effect on virus-induced expression of the endogenous Type I IFN genes. Focusing on the molecular mechanism underlying the dominant negative effect of IRF-7 DN, we found that virus-activated transcription of endogenous IFNA genes requires full-length IRF-7 and that Serine 483 and 484 play an essential role. While IRF-7 DN had no effect on virus-stimulated nuclear translocation of IRF-3 and IRF-7, the binding of IRF-7 DN to IRF-3 and IRF-7 was detected by GST pull-down assay as well as by immunoprecipitation in infected cells, indicating that IRF-7 DN targets both IRF-7 and IRF-3. The region by which IRF-7 interacts with IRF-3 was mapped between amino acid 418 and 473. Overexpression of IRF-7 DN in virus-infected 2FTGH cells resulted in an inhibition of IFN synthesis and in a significant reduction of binding of both IRF-3 and IRF-7 to the IFNA1 promoter. Interestingly, the IRF-7 DN-mediated suppression of IFNA gene expression can be negated by overexpression of IRF-3. Altogether these results suggest that the IRF-3/IRF-7 complexes are biologically active and are involved in virus-activated transcription of endogenous IFNA genes.