Fenoldopam mesylate for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: a randomized controlled trial

Preventing radiocontrast-induced nephropathy in chronic kidney disease patients undergoing coronary angiography

Radiocontrast-induced nephropathy (RCIN) is an acute and severe complication after coronary angiography, particularly for patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease (CKD). It has been associated with both short- and long-term adverse outcomes, including the need for renal replacement therapy, increased length of hospital stay, major cardiac adverse events, and mortality. RCIN is generally defined as an increase in serum creatinine concentration of 0.5 mg/dL or 25% above baseline within 48 h after contrast administration. There is no effective therapy once injury has occurred, therefore, prevention is the cornerstone for all patients at risk for acute kidney injury (AKI). There is a small but growing body of evidence that prevention of AKI is associated with a reduction in later adverse outcomes. The optimal strategy for preventing RCIN has not yet been established. This review discusses the principal risk factors for RCIN, evaluates and summarizes the evidence for RCIN prophylaxis, and proposes recommendations for preventing RCIN in CKD patients undergoing coronary angiography.

Sodium chloride vs. sodium bicarbonate for the prevention of contrast medium-induced nephropathy: a randomized controlled trial

AIMS

The most effective regimen for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) remains uncertain. Our purpose was to compare two regimens of sodium bicarbonate with 24 h sodium chloride 0.9% infusion in the prevention of CIN.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a prospective, randomized trial between March 2005 and December 2009, including 258 consecutive patients with renal insufficiency undergoing intravascular contrast procedures. Patients were randomized to receive intravenous volume supplementation with either (A) sodium chloride 0.9% 1 mL/kg/h for at least 12h prior and after the procedure or (B) sodium bicarbonate (166 mEq/L) 3 mL/kg for 1 h before and 1 mL/kg/h for 6 h after the procedure or (C) sodium bicarbonate (166 mEq/L) 3 mL/kg over 20 min before the procedure plus sodium bicarbonate orally (500 mg per 10 kg). The primary endpoint was the change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) within 48 h after contrast. Secondary endpoints included the development of CIN. The maximum change in eGFR was significantly greater in Group B compared with Group A {mean difference -3.9 [95% confidence interval (CI), -6.8 to -1] mL/min/1.73 m2, P = 0.009} and similar between groups C and B [mean difference 1.3 (95% CI, -1.7-4.3) mL/min/1.73 m(2), P = 0.39]. The incidence of CIN was significantly lower in Group A (1%) vs. Group B (9%, P = 0.02) and similar between Groups B and C (10%, P = 0.9).

CONCLUSION

Volume supplementation with 24 h sodium chloride 0.9% is superior to sodium bicarbonate for the prevention of CIN. A short-term regimen with sodium bicarbonate is non-inferior to a 7 h regimen. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00130598.

Risks and complications of coronary angiography: a comprehensive review

Coronary angiography and heart catheterization are invaluable tests for the detection and quantification of coronary artery disease, identification of valvular and other structural abnormalities, and measurement of hemodynamic parameters. The risks and complications associated with these procedures relate to the patient’s concomitant conditions and to the skill and judgment of the operator. In this review, we examine in detail the major complications associated with invasive cardiac procedures and provide the reader with a comprehensive bibliography for advanced reading.

N-acetylcysteine for Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy: A Narrative Review

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) affects in-hospital, short- and long-term morbidity and mortality. It also leads to prolonged hospital stay and increased medical cost. Given the potential clinical severity of CIN, there has been considerable interest in the development of preventative strategies to reduce the risk of contrast-induced renal deterioration in at-risk populations. A number of pharmacologic and mechanical preventive measures have been attempted, but no method other than adequate periprocedural hydration has been conclusively successful. Since its introduction in 2000, N-acetylcysteine (NAC) has been widely investigated, albeit with conflicting findings for its nephroprotection capability in patients receiving contrast media procedures. However, there is still virtually no definitive evidence of effectiveness of NAC. Although the exact mechanism responsible for the protective action of NAC from renal function deterioration remains unclear, the antioxidant and vasodilatory properties of NAC have been suggested as the main mechanisms. This review summarizes the current status of NAC as a potential agent to prevent renal functional deterioration and its limitations.

Use and efficacy of saline hydration and N-acetyl cysteine to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy in low-risk populations undergoing coronary artery angiography

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is most commonly defined as acute renal failure occurring within 48-72 h of exposure to an intravascular radiographic contrast medium that is not attributable to other causes. In the international literature, a 25% increase in serum creatinine levels or an increase in absolute values of 0.5 mg/dl from baseline has been suggested to define CIN. The reported incidence of CIN varies widely, ranging from 2 to 50%. This variability results from differences in the presence or absence of risk factors. With a retrospective analysis we evaluated the use of saline hydration plus N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) to prevent CIN in a low-risk population of patients undergoing coronary artery angiography compared with an historic low risk group not treated. From January 2009 to December 2009, 152 consecutive patients who underwent coronary artery angiography with a low osmolarity contrast agent were enrolled in our study, and compared with an historic control group consisting of 172 low-risk patients. Nephrotoxic drugs such as diuretics, ACE-I and ARBs were stopped at least 24 h before the procedure. Inclusion criteria to define low-risk population were the absence of: diabetes, age >65 years, or baseline creatinine >1.4 mg/dl. We have treated group A (152 patients, 47.3%) with a saline hydration (1 ml/kg/h) plus N-acetyl cysteine 600 mg 12 h before and 12 h after the procedure; group B (group control of 170 patients, 52.7%) were not treated. The overall incidence of CIN was 7.1% (23 patients). In particular, the incidence of CIN was 2.6% (4 patients) in the group A and 11.2% (19 patients) in the group B (p = 0.002). In the multivariate analysis, including risk factor such as age, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, current smoking habit baseline creatinine level, contrast index and hydration, the last variable was the only one inversely correlated independently with the incidence of CIN (p = 0.001). In conclusion, intravenous hydration with saline and NAC is an effective and low cost tool in preventing CIN in patients undergoing coronary artery angiography, and, according to the current guidelines, should be used in all high-risk patients for CIN. Our results show that even in patients at low risk, hydration with saline 0.9% plus NAC is useful and significantly reduces the incidence of CIN.

Systemic hypothermia to prevent radiocontrast nephropathy (from the COOL-RCN Randomized Trial)

Radiocontrast nephropathy (RCN) develops in a substantial proportion of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) after invasive cardiology procedures and is strongly associated with subsequent mortality and adverse outcomes. We sought to determine whether systemic hypothermia is effective in preventing RCN in patients with CKD. Patients at risk for RCN (baseline estimated creatinine clearance 20 to 50 ml/min) undergoing cardiac catheterization with iodinated contrast ≥50 ml were randomized 1:1 to hydration (control arm) versus hydration plus establishment of systemic hypothermia (33°C to 34°C) before first contrast injection and for 3 hours after the procedure. Serum creatinine levels at baseline, 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 to 96 hours were measured at a central core laboratory. The primary efficacy end point was development of RCN, defined as an increase in serum creatinine by ≥25% from baseline. The primary safety end point was 30-day composite rate of adverse events consisting of death, myocardial infarction, dialysis, ventricular fibrillation, venous complication requiring surgery, major bleeding requiring transfusion ≥2 U, or rehospitalization. In total 128 evaluable patients (mean creatinine clearance 36.6 ml/min) were prospectively randomized at 25 medical centers. RCN developed in 18.6% of normothermic patients and in 22.4% of hypothermic patients (odds ratio 1.27, 95% confidence interval 0.53 to 3.00, p = 0.59). The primary 30-day safety end point occurred in 37.1% versus 37.9% of normothermic and hypothermic patients, respectively (odds ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.47 to 1.98, p = 0.93). In conclusion, in patients with CKD undergoing invasive cardiology procedures, systemic hypothermia is safe but is unlikely to prevent RCN.

Contrast induced nephropathy: updated ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee guidelines

PURPOSE

The Contrast Media Safety Committee (CMSC) of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) has updated its 1999 guidelines on contrast medium-induced nephropathy (CIN).

AREAS COVERED

Topics reviewed include the definition of CIN, the choice of contrast medium, the prophylactic measures used to reduce the incidence of CIN, and the management of patients receiving metformin. Key Points • Definition, risk factors and prevention of contrast medium induced nephropathy are reviewed. • CIN risk is lower with intravenous than intra-arterial iodinated contrast medium. • eGFR of 45 ml/min/1.73 m (2) is CIN risk threshold for intravenous contrast medium. • Hydration with either saline or sodium bicarbonate reduces CIN incidence. • Patients with eGFR ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73 m (2) receiving contrast medium can continue metformin normally.

Contrast induced nephropathy in urology

Intravenous contrast agents have a distinct role in urological imaging: to study precise anatomical delineation, vascularity, and to assess the function of the renal unit. Contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) is a known adverse effect of intravenous contrast administration. The literature on incidence, pathophysiology, clinical features, and current preventive strategies available for CIN relevant to urologists was reviewed. A search of the PubMed database was done using the keywords nephropathy and media, prevention and control or prevention Contrast media (explode), all adverse effects, and kidney diseases (explode). An online search of the EMBASE database for the time ranging from 1977 to February 2009 was performed using the keywords ionic contrast medium, adverse drug reaction, major or controlled clinical study, human, nephrotoxicity, and kidney disease. Current publications and data most relevant to urologists were examined. CIN was the third most common cause of hospital-acquired renal failure. The incidence is less common with intravenous contrast administration as compared with intra-arterial administration. The pathogenesis of contrast mediated nephropathy is due to a combination of toxic injury to renal tubules and medullary ischemic injury mediated by reactive oxygen species. CIN most commonly manifests as a nonoliguric and asymptomatic transient decline in renal function. Patients who developed CIN were found to have increased mortality, longer hospital stay, and complicated clinical course. An overview of risk factors and risk prediction score for prognostication of CIN are elaborated. Preventive strategies including choice of contrast agents, maximum tolerated dose, role of hydration, hydration regime, etc. are discussed. The role of N- acetyl cysteine, Theophylline, Fenoldapam, Endothelin receptor antagonists, iloprost, atrial natriuretic peptide, and newer therapies such as targeted renal therapy (TRT) are discussed. A working algorithm based on current evidence is proposed. No current treatment can reverse or ameliorate CIN once it occurs, but prophylaxis is possible.

Contrast-induced nephropathy: what we know, what we think we know, and what we don't know

Contrast-induced nephropathy is a common but poorly understood problem. A large body of literature devoted to the subject is replete with contradictions and conflicting reports. The purpose of this article is to summarize our current understanding of the problem by reviewing some of the best studies done to date. Recommendations based on the current literature are also provided.

Contrast-induced nephropathy in interventional cardiology

Development of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), ie, a rise in serum creatinine by either ≥0.5 mg/dL or by ≥25% from baseline within the first 2-3 days after contrast administration, is strongly associated with both increased inhospital and late morbidity and mortality after invasive cardiac procedures. The prevention of CIN is critical if long-term outcomes are to be optimized after percutaneous coronary intervention. The prevalence of CIN in patients receiving contrast varies markedly (from <1% to 50%), depending on the presence of well characterized risk factors, the most important of which are baseline chronic renal insufficiency and diabetes mellitus. Other risk factors include advanced age, anemia, left ventricular dysfunction, dehydration, hypotension, renal transplant, low serum albumin, concomitant use of nephrotoxins, and the volume of contrast agent. The pathophysiology of CIN is likely to be multifactorial, including direct cytotoxicity, apoptosis, disturbances in intrarenal hemodynamics, and immune mechanisms. Few strategies have been shown to be effective to prevent CIN beyond hydration, the goal of which is to establish brisk diuresis prior to contrast administration, and to avoid hypotension. New strategies of controlled hydration and diuresis are promising. Studies are mixed on whether prophylactic oral N-acetylcysteine reduces the incidence of CIN, although its use is generally recommended, given its low cost and favorable side effect profile. Agents which have been shown to be ineffective or harmful, or for which data supporting routine use do not exist, include fenoldopam, theophylline, dopamine, calcium channel blockers, prostaglandin E(1), atrial natriuretic peptide, statins, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.

Preventive strategies of renal insufficiency in patients with diabetes undergoing intervention or arteriography (the PREVENT Trial)

Few studies have compared the ability of sodium bicarbonate plus N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and sodium chloride plus NAC to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in diabetic patients with impaired renal function undergoing coronary or endovascular angiography or intervention. Diabetic patients (n = 382) with renal disease (serum creatinine ≥1.1 mg/dl and estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) were randomly assigned to receive prophylactic sodium chloride (saline group, n = 189) or sodium bicarbonate (bicarbonate group, n = 193) before elective coronary or endovascular angiography or intervention. All patients received oral NAC 1,200 mg 2 times/day for 2 days. The primary end point was CIN, defined as an increase in serum creatinine >25% or an absolute increase in serum creatinine ≥0.5 mg/dl within 48 hours after contrast exposure. There were no significant between-group differences in baseline characteristics. The primary end point was met in 10 patients (5.3%) in the saline group and 17 (9.0%) in the bicarbonate group (p = 0.17), with 2 (1.1%) and 4 (2.1%), respectively, requiring hemodialysis (p = 0.69). Rates of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke did not differ significantly at 1 month and 6 months after contrast exposure. In conclusion, hydration with sodium bicarbonate is not superior to hydration with sodium chloride in preventing CIN in patients with diabetic nephropathy undergoing coronary or endovascular angiography or intervention.

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury: short- and long-term implications

The intravascular administration of iodine-based contrast media remains a common cause of acute kidney injury and a leading cause of iatrogenic renal disease. Past research has elucidated the principal risk factors for contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CIAKI) and helped to establish the efficacy of various interventions for the prevention of this condition. The importance of preventing CIAKI has been underscored by a growing number of studies showing strong associations of CIAKI with serious adverse short- and long-term outcomes. However, it remains unclear whether these associations are causal. This is important because considerable health care resources are used to prevent CIAKI. If CIAKI is a marker, but not a mediator, of serious adverse downstream outcomes, more judicious and selective use of preventive care may be appropriate. Moreover, with an increasing number of studies reporting the underuse of coronary angiography in patients with acute coronary syndrome and underlying chronic kidney disease, presumably in part because of a fear of CIAKI, a clear understanding of whether this condition directly results in adverse downstream outcomes is essential. Careful inspection of past studies that investigated the association of CIAKI with adverse short- and long-term events sheds light on their strengths and weaknesses and provides insight into how future research may be better able to characterize the short- and long-term implications of this iatrogenic condition.

Strategies for the prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The intravascular administration of iodinated contrast media for diagnostic imaging is a common cause of acute kidney injury and a leading cause of iatrogenic renal disease. The purpose of this review is to describe the principal risk factors for contrast-induced acute kidney injury and to summarize recent data describing the efficacy of various preventive interventions for this condition.

RECENT FINDINGS

Whereas earlier studies suggested that certain low-osmolal contrast agents including iohexol and ioxaglate are more nephrotoxic than iso-osmolal iodixanol, recent clinical trials and meta-analyses comparing other low-osmolal contrast agents with iodixanol have found little difference in risk. The provision of prophylactic renal replacement therapy does not ameliorate the risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury, and likely poses undue risk. Despite some research supporting a benefit of atrial natriuretic peptide, statins, and prostaglandin analogs, additional data from large, adequately powered studies are needed before these agents can be recommended. N-Acetylcysteine and isotonic intravenous bicarbonate have been investigated intensely, yet the data on these interventions are conflicting due to methodological limitations in past studies.

SUMMARY

Prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury involves the identification of high-risk patients, consideration of alternative imaging procedures that do not involve the administration of iodinated contrast, and integration of the cumulative data available on preventive interventions in high-risk patients.

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury and diabetic nephropathy

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CIAKI) is a leading cause of iatrogenic renal failure. Multiple studies have shown that patients with diabetic nephropathy are at high risk of CIAKI. This Review presents an overview of the pathogenesis of CIAKI in patients with diabetic nephropathy and discusses the currently available and potential future strategies for CIAKI prevention.

Contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Contrast Induced Nephropathy (CIN) is a feared complication of numerous radiological procedures that expose patients to contrast media. The most notorious of these procedures is percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Not only is this a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, but it also adds to increased costs in high risk patients undergoing PCI. It is thought to result from direct cytotoxicity and hemodynamic challenge to renal tissue. CIN is defined as an increase in serum creatinine by either ≥0.5 mg/dL or by ≥25% from baseline within the first 2-3 days after contrast administration, after other causes of renal impairment have been excluded. The incidence is considerably higher in diabetics, elderly and patients with pre-existing renal disease when compared to the general population. The nephrotoxic potential of various contrast agents must be evaluated completely, with prevention as the mainstay of focus as no effective treatment exists. The purpose of this article is to examine the pathophysiology, risk factors, and clinical course of CIN, as well as the most recent studies dealing with its prevention and potential therapeutic interventions, especially during PCI. The role of gadolinium as an alternative to iodinated contrast is also discussed.

Novel aspects of pharmacological therapies for acute renal failure

Acute renal failure (ARF) comprises several syndromes that are associated with a sudden decrease in renal function. ARF is common among critically ill patients, is typically multifactorial and is of great prognostic significance. Indeed, even moderate changes in renal function significantly add to the morbidity and worsen mortality associated with ARF. Recent definitions, namely the renal Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of renal function and End-stage kidney disease (RIFLE) classification or Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria, which incorporate the levels of oliguria in addition to fractional serum creatinine elevation, are important because the magnitude of kidney injury according to those definitions correlates very well with both short- and long-term patient survival. However, preventive strategies are most effective when started before oliguria or elevated serum creatinine is detectable, as those criteria already reflect established renal tubular cell injury. New biomarkers, including neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), liver-type fatty acid binding protein (L-FABP) or kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) that increase prior to the serum creatinine elevation are promising and have been proven to be useful in this regard in a few clinical trials. In addition, genetic profiling may define patients at risk earlier and help to individualize preventive strategies. Well established strategies include limiting dehydration and hypotension by the use of intravenous isotonic fluids at an optimal and individualized rate, as well as avoiding exposure to nephrotoxins, which include aminoglycosides, amphotericin or non-ionic contrast. Generally accepted and evidence-based pharmacological preventive or therapeutic options have not yet been established, although many drugs (e.g. renal vasodilators, diuretics and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors [statins]) have been tested. New promising agents interfere with the apoptotic signalling that can occur in the setting of toxin exposure or ischaemia-reperfusion injury, limit inflammatory responses or modulate endothelial cell activation. In the future, these new approaches will enable us to extend our therapeutic repertoire.

A prospective assessment of renal impairment after preparation for colonoscopy: oral sodium phosphate appears to be safe in well-hydrated subjects with normal renal status

BACKGROUND

The outcome of colonoscopy is highly dependent upon the quality of bowel cleansing prior to the procedure. Oral sodium phosphate solutions (OSPS) or preparations containing polyethylene glycol (PEG) are generally employed. However, the safety of administering OSPS prior to colonoscopy has been questioned because of the potential for renal failure.

AIM

To compare rates of renal failure after OSPS and PEG in a randomized, prospective trial and to assess the quality of colonoscopy after these two bowel preparations.

METHODS

Subjects with eGFR >or= 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) and expressed willingness to adhere to hydration recommendations were randomized to OSPS or PEG solutions. Renal function was assessed 1 week prior to, immediately prior to, and 1 week after colonoscopy.

RESULTS

No subject had acute kidney failure after OSPS or PEG. OSPS was associated with significant increases in the serum phosphate and sodium levels and significant decreases in the calcium and potassium levels. These values returned to normal limits in all subjects by 1 week after colonoscopy. The quality of colonic cleansing was superior after OSPS than after PEG (Ottawa score 2.5 +/- 2.2 vs. 3.5 +/- 2.3, respectively, P < 0.05). The detection of one or more adenomatous polyps was higher after OSPS than after PEG.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal failure was not detected after the use of OSPS for colonoscopy preparation in subjects with recently documented normal renal function who were able to consume the required amounts of water after each dose. However, based on the number of subjects studied, the theoretical risk of this complication is still between 0 and 6.3%. Thus, it is appreciated that only a very large prospective trial would have yielded a more accurate estimate of the likelihood of renal compromise after OSPS. Despite this caveat, OSPS has advantages over PEG in terms of the adequacy of colonic visualization and the number of polyps detected.

Fenoldopam use in a burn intensive care unit: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Fenoldopam mesylate is a highly selective dopamine-1 receptor agonist approved for the treatment of hypertensive emergencies that may have a role at low doses in preserving renal function in those at high risk for or with acute kidney injury (AKI). There is no data on low-dose fenoldopam in the burn population. The purpose of our study was to describe our use of low-dose fenoldopam (0.03-0.09 mug/kg/min) infusion in critically ill burn patients with AKI.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients admitted to our burn intensive care unit (BICU) with severe burns from November 2005 through September 2008 who received low-dose fenoldopam. Data obtained included systolic blood pressure, serum creatinine, vasoactive medication use, urine output, and intravenous fluid. Patients on concomitant continuous renal replacement therapy were excluded. Modified inotrope score and vasopressor dependency index were calculated. One-way analysis of variance with repeated measures, Wilcoxson signed rank, and chi-square tests were used. Differences were deemed significant at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven patients were treated with low-dose fenoldopam out of 758 BICU admissions (10%). Twenty (26%) were AKI network (AKIN) stage 1, 14 (18%) were AKIN stage 2, 42 (55%) were AKIN stage 3, and 1 (1%) was AKIN stage 0. Serum creatinine improved over the first 24 hours and continued to improve through 48 hours (p < 0.05). There was an increase in systolic blood pressure in the first 24 hours that was sustained through 48 hours after initiation of fenoldopam (p < 0.05). Urine output increased after initiation of fenoldopam without an increase in intravenous fluid requirement (p < 0.05; p = NS). Modified inotrope score and vasopressor dependency index both decreased over 48 hours (p < 0.0001; p = 0.0012).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that renal function was preserved and that urine output improved without a decrease in systolic blood pressure, increase in vasoactive medication use, or an increase in resuscitation requirement in patients treated with low-dose fenoldopam. A randomized controlled trial is required to establish the efficacy of low-dose fenoldopam in critically ill burn patients with AKI.

Evidence-based management of patients undergoing PCI: contrast-induced acute kidney injury

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is one of the leading causes of hospital-acquired acute kidney injury. CI-AKI is highly prevalent in patients with well-known risk factors, including older age, chronic renal insufficiency, congestive heart failure, and diabetes. Thus far, no strategies have been shown to be effective in preventing CI-AKI beyond thorough patient selection, minimizing the amount of contrast agent, and meticulous hydration of the patient. The role of various drugs in preventing CI-AKI is still controversial and warrants future studies. Despite the remaining uncertainty regarding the degree of nephrotoxicity produced by various contrast agents, nonionic low-osmolar contrast media may be preferred in patients at high risk for CI-AKI.

An Official ATS/ERS/ESICM/SCCM/SRLF Statement: Prevention and Management of Acute Renal Failure in the ICU Patient: an international consensus conference in intensive care medicine

OBJECTIVES

To address the issues of Prevention and Management of Acute Renal Failure in the ICU Patient, using the format of an International Consensus Conference.

METHODS AND QUESTIONS

Five main questions formulated by scientific advisors were addressed by experts during a 2-day symposium and a Jury summarized the available evidence: (1) Identification and definition of acute kidney insufficiency (AKI), this terminology being selected by the Jury; (2) Prevention of AKI during routine ICU Care; (3) Prevention in specific diseases, including liver failure, lung Injury, cardiac surgery, tumor lysis syndrome, rhabdomyolysis and elevated intraabdominal pressure; (4) Management of AKI, including nutrition, anticoagulation, and dialysate composition; (5) Impact of renal replacement therapy on mortality and recovery.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The Jury recommended the use of newly described definitions. AKI significantly contributes to the morbidity and mortality of critically ill patients, and adequate volume repletion is of major importance for its prevention, though correction of fluid deficit will not always prevent renal failure. Fluid resuscitation with crystalloids is effective and safe, and hyperoncotic solutions are not recommended because of their renal risk. Renal replacement therapy is a life-sustaining intervention that can provide a bridge to renal recovery; no method has proven to be superior, but careful management is essential for improving outcome.

Prevention of acute kidney injury and protection of renal function in the intensive care unit. Expert opinion of the Working Group for Nephrology, ESICM

BACKGROUND

Acute renal failure on the intensive care unit is associated with significant mortality and morbidity.

OBJECTIVES

To determine recommendations for the prevention of acute kidney injury (AKI), focusing on the role of potential preventative maneuvers including volume expansion, diuretics, use of inotropes, vasopressors/vasodilators, hormonal interventions, nutrition, and extracorporeal techniques.

METHOD

A systematic search of the literature was performed for studies using these potential protective agents in adult patients at risk for acute renal failure/kidney injury between 1966 and 2009. The following clinical conditions were considered: major surgery, critical illness, sepsis, shock, and use of potentially nephrotoxic drugs and radiocontrast media. Where possible the following endpoints were extracted: creatinine clearance, glomerular filtration rate, increase in serum creatinine, urine output, and markers of tubular injury. Clinical endpoints included the need for renal replacement therapy, length of stay, and mortality. Studies are graded according to the international Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) group system.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Several measures are recommended, though none carries grade 1A. We recommend prompt resuscitation of the circulation with special attention to providing adequate hydration whilst avoiding high-molecular-weight hydroxy-ethyl starch (HES) preparations, maintaining adequate blood pressure using vasopressors in vasodilatory shock. We suggest specific vasodilators [corrected] under strict hemodynamic control, sodium bicarbonate for emergency procedures administering contrast media, and periprocedural hemofiltration in severe chronic renal insufficiency undergoing coronary intervention.

ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00134-009-1678-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

[Contrast-induced nephropathy]

Acute kidney injury is a common complication after contrast administration in radiology or cardiology. It increases morbidity and in-hospital but also long-term mortality. The pathophysiology is complex, there is an association of direct cellular toxicity of contrast agents and medullary ischemia secondary to alterations in intra-renal hemodynamics and to an increase in metabolic activity. Many risk factors have been identified and should be checked prior to injection, the most important being pre-existing renal failure which might be identified by calculating the estimated glomerular filtration rate with predictive equations such as Cockcroft-Gault or MDRD equations. When risk factors are present and contrast administration is really necessary, the only validated measure to reduce the risk of renal failure is still volume expansion. Other pharmacological interventions have interesting results, but a confirmation on a larger scale is necessary. The volume expansion is best performed intravenously by the isotonic saline or sodium bicarbonate.

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients with renal dysfunction undergoing a coronary procedure and receiving non-ionic low-osmolar versus iso-osmolar contrast media

BACKGROUND

Although the superiority of low-osmolar over high-osmolar contrast agents in prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is generally accepted, the relative nephrotoxicity of iso-osmolar over low-osmolar agents has not yet clearly defined. We examined the incidence of CI-AKI according to the type of contrast agent used in a randomized study of ascorbic acid for CI-AKI prevention.

METHODS

A total of 222 patients with baseline serum creatinine >or=1.2 mg/dL who were undergoing a coronary procedure and who were randomized to receive ascorbic acid or placebo were evaluated. The iso-osmolar agent iodixanol was used in 144 patients, whereas low-osmolar non-ionic agents were used in 78 patients (iomeprol, n = 40; iobitridol, n = 30; iopentol, n = 8). CI-AKI was defined by an absolute serum creatinine increase of >or=0.5 mg/dL or a relative increase of >or=25% measured 2 to 5 days after the procedure.

RESULTS

The groups of patients who received iso-osmolar and low-osmolar non-ionic agents were well balanced in terms of demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics. The overall CI-AKI incidence was 14.6% for the iso-osmolar iodixanol versus 14.1% for the combined low-osmolar non-ionic agents (iomeprol, 10%; iobitridol, 10%; iopentol, 50%). For iodixanol, the incidence of CI-AKI was 7.4% for patients randomized to receive ascorbic acid and 21.6% for placebo (P = 0.02). The corresponding incidences for the low-osmolar non-ionic agents were 9.1% and 20.6%, respectively (P = 0.19).

CONCLUSION

No differences in CI-AKI incidence were apparent among patients receiving non-ionic iso-osmolar iodixanol and non-ionic low-osmolar contrast agents. The preventative effect of ascorbic acid was also similar.

Contrast-induced nephropathy: pathogenesis and prevention

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is the third most common cause of acute kidney injury in hospitalized patients. Diagnostic and interventional cardiovascular procedures generate nearly half the cases. Elderly patients and those with chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease are at greatest risk. Procedure-related risk factors include large volumes of contrast and agents with a high osmolality. Renal medullary ischemia arising from an imbalance of local vasoconstrictive and vasodilatory influences coupled with increased demand for oxygen-driven sodium transport may be the key to its pathogenesis. Contrast agents may also have a direct cytotoxic effect that operates through the generation of reactive oxygen species. Pre- and post-procedure administration of normal saline, isotonic sodium bicarbonate, N-acetylcysteine, and a variety of other pharmacologic agents have been used to prevent or mitigate CIN. While normal saline is generally accepted as protective against CIN, uncertainty still surrounds the role of sodium bicarbonate and N-acetylcysteine. Dialytic therapies before, during, and after exposure to contrast have been tested with mixed results. Logistical and economic disincentives argue against these modalities.

Sodium bicarbonate plus N-acetylcysteine prophylaxis: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

We sought to conduct a meta-analysis to compare N-acetylcysteine (NAC) in combination with sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO(3)) for the prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (AKI).

BACKGROUND

Contrast-induced AKI is a serious consequence of cardiac catheterizations and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Despite recent supporting evidence for combination therapy, not enough has been done to prevent the occurrence of contrast-induced AKI prophylactically.

METHODS

Published randomized controlled trial data were collected from OVID/PubMed, Web of Science, and conference abstracts. The outcome of interest was contrast-induced AKI, defined as a >or=25% or >or=0.5 mg/dl increase in serum creatinine from baseline. Secondary outcome was renal failure requiring dialysis.

RESULTS

Ten randomized controlled trials met our criteria. Combination treatment of NAC with intravenous NaHCO(3) reduced contrast-induced AKI by 35% (relative risk: 0.65; 95% confidence interval: 0.40 to 1.05). However, the combination of N-acetylcysteine plus NaHCO(3) did not significantly reduce renal failure requiring dialysis (relative risk: 0.47; 95% confidence interval: 0.16 to 1.41).

CONCLUSIONS

Combination prophylaxis with NAC and NaHCO(3) substantially reduced the occurrence of contrast-induced AKI overall but not dialysis-dependent renal failure. Combination prophylaxis should be incorporated for all high-risk patients (emergent cases or patients with chronic kidney disease) and should be strongly considered for all interventional radio-contrast procedures.

Mitigating contrast-induced acute kidney injury associated with cardiac catheterization

Contrast-induced nephropathy, also referred to as contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CIAKI), is among the most common causes of AKI, especially in patients with underlying chronic kidney disease. In addition to the increased cost engendered by the development of CIAKI, several studies have suggested the occurrence of AKI after cardiac procedures is associated with an increase in both morbidity and mortality. This increase in morbidity and mortality occurs after both intravenous and intra-arterial studies. This review focuses on relevant proposed pathophysiological mechanisms, risk factors, and current prophylactic strategies, which may reduce the incidence of CIAKI during cardiac angiographic imaging studies.

Hospital-acquired acute kidney injury

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common clinical syndrome in hospitalized patients associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Despite several years of improvement in the medical care of the severely ill, there has been little improvement in outcome. Furthermore, effective means of preventing and treating AKI have remained elusive. Although dialysis has been the mainstay of treating AKI for > 40 years, several questions regarding its application remain unsettled, including method (continuous vs intermittent), timing, and dose. The purpose of this review is to summarize recent advances in the epidemiology and treatment of AKI in hospitalized patients.

Prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: an overview

Many unknowns remain concerning how best to reduce a patient's risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). Many interventions have been proposed, but few have gone unchallenged, and new questions have arisen from analysis of serum creatinine variations in patients who have not been exposed to radiographic iodinated contrast media (RICM). Use of alternate imaging tests that do not use RICM is the most direct way to avoid CIN. Hydration remains the bulwark of intervention when RICM must be administered. The administration of N-acetylcysteine is a popular pharmacologic prophylaxis against CIN but its efficacy is unclear. Hemodialysis has not been effective, but hemofiltration has shown good results in limited series.

Risk Factors and Therapy Strategies for Contrast-Induced Nephropathy

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, as well as increased costs for medical care, particularly in patients with diabetes mellitus and chronic renal failure. A key step to safer CIN is to identify patients at risk and applying proven preventive interventions. Extracellular volume expansion, minimizing the dose of contrast media, using low-osmolar non-ionic contrast media, stopping the intake of nephrotoxic drugs, and avoiding short intervals between procedures have all been shown to be effective in reducing CIN. The aim of the present review is to summarize the knowledge about the risk factors and prophylactic treatments of CIN.

Contrast-induced nephropathy and long-term adverse events: cause and effect?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The relationship of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) to long-term adverse events (AEs) is controversial. Although an association with AEs has been previously reported, it is unclear whether CIN is causally related to these AEs.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

We obtained long-term (> or =1 yr) follow-up on 294 patients who participated in a randomized, double-blind comparison of two prevention strategies for CIN (iopamidol versus iodixanol). A difference in the incidence of AEs between patients who had developed CIN and those who had not was performed using a chi(2) test and Poisson regression analysis. A similar statistical approach was used for the differences in AEs between those who received iopamidol or iodixanol. Multiple definitions of CIN were used to strengthen and validate the results and conclusions.

RESULTS

The rate of long-term AEs was higher in individuals with CIN (all definitions of CIN). After adjustment for baseline comorbidities and risk factors, the adjusted incidence rate ratio for AEs was twice as high in those with CIN. Randomization to iopamidol reduced both the incidence of CIN and AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

The parallel decrease in the incidence of CIN and AEs in one arm of this randomized trial supports a causal role for CIN.

Acetylcysteine and non-ionic isosmolar contrast-induced nephropathy--a randomized controlled study

INTRODUCTION

Intravenous administration of saline and non-ionic isosmolar contrast media significantly reduces the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy, one of the most common causes of acute renal failure. Results with oral N-acetylcysteine are conflicting. The aim of our study was to evaluate the prophylactic role of N-acetylcysteine in patients with stable chronic renal failure undergoing coronary and/or peripheral angiography and/or angioplasty.

METHODS

We randomized 200 elective, consecutive patients (mean age 74.9 +/- 7.3 years; 65% male, 25% diabetics) with basal creatinine clearance <or=55 ml/min to receive oral N-acetylcysteine (600 mg bid the day before and the day of the procedure plus saline i.v. 0.9% 1 ml/kg/h 12-24 h before and 24 h after the procedure, n = 99) or placebo and saline at the same time intervals, n = 101. The contrast medium was non-ionic isosmolar (Iodixanol, Visipaque Amersham Health). Contrast-induced nephropathy was defined as an increase in serum creatinine >0.5 mg/dl or >25% within 3 days after the procedure. Serum creatinine was measured at baseline, 24, 48 and 72 h after the procedure.

RESULTS

Contrast-induced nephropathy was 8/99 (8.1%) in the N-acetylcysteine group versus 6/101 (5.9%) in the placebo group, P = 0.6. No difference was noted in high-risk subgroups such as diabetics (4/25 versus 2/25 P = 0.4) and those with serum creatinine clearance <42.3 ml/min (5/54 versus 4/48; P = 0.9).

CONCLUSION

In our experience, N-acetylcysteine did not prevent contrast-induced nephropathy in patients receiving isosmolar (iodixanol) contrast media and adequate hydration.

Preventing contrast-induced nephropathy: problems, challenges and future directions

Contrast-induced nephropathy is an injury to the kidney occurring as a result of exposure to intravascular contrast media. It results in both short- and long-term adverse events including mortality. Since treatment of the injury after it has occurred is ineffective, efforts to prevent the injury are the focus of investigators and clinicians alike. In this commentary, the pathogenesis and clinical relevance of contrast-induced nephropathy are reviewed. Prophylactic strategies are discussed with a focus on the use of meta-analysis of small single-center trials.

Safety and performance of targeted renal therapy: the Be-RITe! Registry

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and patterns of use of targeted renal therapy (TRT) with the Benephit system. TRT, the delivery of therapeutic agents directly to the kidneys by renal arterial infusion, has the advantage of providing a higher local effective dose with potentially greater renal effects, while limiting systemic adverse effects due to renal first-pass elimination.

METHODS

The Benephit System Renal Infusion Therapy (Be-RITe!) Multicenter Registry was a post-market registry following patients treated using the Benephit systems for TRT. The registry enrolled 501 patients (332 men; mean age 72.2+/-9.5 years) at high risk for contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) during coronary or peripheral angiography/intervention or cardiovascular surgery. The Mehran score was used to compare the actual to predicted incidence of CIN within 48 hours post procedure.

RESULTS

Bilateral renal artery cannulation was successful in 94.2%, with a mean cannulation time of 2.0 minutes. Either fenoldopam mesylate, sodium bicarbonate, alprostadil, or B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) was infused for 184+/-212 minutes. Mean creatinine levels did not change significantly (baseline, 24, and 48 hours post procedure: 1.95, 1.99, and 1.98 mg/dL, respectively; p = NS). In 285 patients who received TRT with fenoldopam and were followed for at least 48 hours, the incidence of CIN was 71% lower than predicted (8.1% actual CIN versus 28.0% predicted; p<0.0001). Only 4 (1.4%) patients required dialysis (versus the 2.6% predicted rate, p = NS).

CONCLUSION

The Benephit system and TRT during coronary and endovascular procedures in patients at high risk for renal failure is simple to use and safe. With the infusion of intrarenal fenoldopam, the incidence of CIN was significantly lower than predicted by risk score calculations.

N-acetylcysteine to reduce renal failure after cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) on acute renal failure and important clinical outcomes after cardiac surgery.

METHODS

Two reviewers performed literature searches, using EMBASE and PubMed, of randomized controlled trials investigating the renoprotective effect of N-acetylcysteine in cardiac surgery. Treatment effects were calculated as relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed using the I(2) test and funnel plots, respectively. Meta regression was performed to assess the effect of baseline renal function and the use of aprotinin on renal function.

RESULTS

Seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 1000) were identified. No study could demonstrate, either independently or meta-analytically, an improvement in the postoperative increase in creatinine, mortality (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.4 to 2.07), renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.49 to 2.12), myocardial infarction (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.88), atrial fibrillation (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.10), or stroke (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.69). There was a small, though significant increase in postoperative blood loss among patients treated with NAC (weighted mean difference 119 mL 95% CI 51, 187). After meta regression neither increase in postoperative creatinine (r(2) = 0.33) nor renal replacement therapy (r(2) = 0.04) was associated with the baseline creatinine or with NAC dose (r(2) =0.04).

CONCLUSION

This analysis did not find that treatment with NAC was associated with clinical renal protection during cardiac surgery, or improvement in other clinical outcomes.