Comparative Effectiveness of Rituximab and Other Initial Treatment Choices for Multiple Sclerosis

Re-Evaluating the Use of IFN-β and Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: Safety, Efficacy and Place in Therapy

The advent of interferon therapy for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) was a massive advancement in the field and changed the course of the disease. While the exact mechanism of interferon therapy in MS is unknown, disease control is likely mediated by reducing Th1 and Th17 cells while increasing regulatory T cells and altering the cytokine profile. Interferon therapy not only gave physicians and patients an evidence-based treatment option to treat MS by decreasing relapses and the accrual of disability but it also provided valuable insight into disease pathophysiology that allowed for the development of further treatments. Currently, there are 18 disease-modifying therapies available for the treatment of MS with varying efficacies, routes of administration, and mechanisms. As treatment options in the field have evolved, interferon therapy is less commonly prescribed as first-line therapy, because the newer therapies are more effective and better tolerated. That being said, interferons still have a place in the field in both clinical practice and clinical trial research. In this review, we will summarize the safety and efficacy of interferon therapy and discuss its current place in MS care.

Rituximab in patients with pediatric multiple sclerosis and other demyelinating disorders of the CNS: Practical considerations

Anti-CD20 therapies have established efficacy in the treatment of immune-mediated neurological and non-neurological diseases. Rituximab, one of the first B-cell-directed therapies, is relatively inexpensive compared to newer anti-CD20 molecules, is available in many countries, and has been used off-label in pediatric patients with neuroimmune conditions. The objective of this paper is to describe the experience with rituximab in pediatric multiple sclerosis and other inflammatory immune-mediated disorders of the central nervous system (CNS), and to define a protocol for its use in clinical practice, in particular addressing doses, interval of administration, duration of treatment, and tests to perform at baseline and during follow-up.

[Ocrelizumab for treatment of multiple sclerosis]

Ocrelizumab ist ein monoklonaler Antikörper, der sich gegen das Differenzierungsantigen CD20 richtet und zu einer effektiven längerfristigen Depletion von Lymphozyten, insbesondere von B‑Zellen, führt. Unlängst publizierte Phase-3-Studien belegen, dass Ocrelizumab sowohl bei der Behandlung der schubförmigen als auch der primär progressiven Multiplen Sklerose (MS) wirksam ist. Darauf basierend wurde Ocrelizumab als erstes Medikament zur Behandlung der primär chronisch-progredienten MS zugelassen. Um diesen Durchbruch besser in den Kontext des heutigen MS-Therapiekanons einordnen zu können, lohnt sowohl ein Blick zurück auf die Entwicklung der antikörpervermittelten CD20-Depletion als auch auf die der Zulassung zugrunde liegenden Studien sowie deren Extensionsphasen. Diese Übersichtsarbeit diskutiert die verfügbaren Daten zur Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit der langfristigen B‑Zell-Depletion bei MS-Patienten und erörtert den aktuellen Kenntnisstand zur Rolle von B‑Lymphozyten in der Immunpathogenese der MS.

Rituximab in multiple sclerosis at general hospital level

OBJECTIVES

The use of rituximab (RTX) in multiple sclerosis (MS) is a rapidly increasing choice of disease-modifying therapy. Efficacy outside specialized university hospital-based care is not yet systematically investigated. Our aim was to evaluate off-label RTX treatment for MS at a general hospital in Sweden.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects with definite MS with at least one rituximab infusion were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective, observational study. Effect was evaluated by monitoring clinical disability, annual relapse rate, new lesions on MRI, and safety by the incidence and severity of adverse events.

RESULTS

Among the 83 included subjects, 15 had clinical worsening of disease during the median 23.5 (1-76) months of follow-up after RTX initiation: 7/66 with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and 8/17 with progressive subtypes (PMS). Cumulative survival without worsening was 86% in RRMS and 30% in PMS. The annual relapse rate before RTX vs follow-up dropped from 0.38 to 0.05 (P < .00001). Subjects with new enhancing lesions on MRI during the first year before RTX initiation vs the year after dropped from 0.94 to 0.024 (P < .00001) and was only seen in RRMS (1.05-0.31, P = .00003). Adverse events were mainly mild. Thirty-six out of 53 non-infusion-related adverse events were infections, of which four were serious, including a case of pneumonia with concomitant late-onset neutropenia.

CONCLUSIONS

Rituximab was as effective and safe when given at a general hospital outpatient clinic compared with results from previous university hospital-based studies. Vigilance is required concerning severe adverse events.

Efficacy and safety of rituximab in multiple sclerosis: Experience from a developing country

BACKGROUND

Rituximab is increasingly being used in treatment of multiple Sclerosis (MS) in our centers due to its easy availability, efficacy and favorable side effect profile. Here we describe experience with rituximab over a period of 4 years from three MS centers from south India.

METHODS

The data of MS patients who were treated with rituximab in three MS centers at Bangalore, India, from December 2015 to December 2019 were collected and evaluated with respect to relapse rate, EDSS score and adverse events.

RESULTS

Over the four-year study period 118 MS patients were evaluated, 80 of whom were on rituximab. 58 (72%) had RRMS, 15 (19%) SPMS and 7 (9%) PPMS. Most patients (89%) received rituximab at a dose of 500 mg every 6-12 months. Nine patients (11%), all with progressive MS were on 1 gm to 2 gm every 6 months. Follow up ranged from 1 year to 3 years, with a median of 2 years. 56 (97%) RRMS patients had no relapses during follow up. EDSS score improved by a score of 0.5-2.0 in 68 (85%) patients, remained same in 10 (12.5%) and worsened in 2 patients (2.5%). Most patients (91%) tolerated rituximab infusions well. There were no opportunistic infections or neoplasms.

CONCLUSION

Anti B cell therapy with rituximab appears effective, safe and affordable in the treatment of MS in developing countries like India with resource limited settings.

Use of rituximab in adults with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic literature review

Objective: Rituximab is used as an off-label treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS); however, the comparative efficacy and safety of rituximab versus currently licensed disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) for RRMS is unknown. A systematic literature review was conducted to evaluate the available data pertaining to efficacy and safety of rituximab in adult patients with RRMS and highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis (HA-RMS); data quality was critically assessed via risk of bias (RoB) assessment.Methods: Biomedical literature databases were searched until mid-2018 and key proceedings were searched from 2016 to 2018. Critical appraisal of non-randomized studies was conducted using the Cochrane RoB assessment tool; randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were appraised using comprehensive assessment criteria based on the NICE guidelines.Results: Thirty-eight unique studies based on 49 publications were identified: 25 RRMS studies (one RCT) and 13 HA-RMS studies (no RCTs). The evidence among patients with RRMS generally favored rituximab in comparison to placebo (relapse rate) and interferons/glatiramer acetate (relapse rate and disability progression), although much of the non-randomized data were descriptive and/or not statistically significant. In comparison to placebo, rituximab was associated with a greater risk of adverse events. Two-thirds of the non-randomized RRMS studies were associated with critical/serious RoB; the single RCT was associated with low RoB. Furthermore, all of the non-randomized HA-RMS studies were associated with critical/serious RoB.Conclusions: Available evidence of off-label rituximab use for the treatment of patients with RRMS suggests generally favorable efficacy versus placebo and interferons/glatiramer acetate; however, the poor quality of the included studies limits any robust conclusions.

Experience with rituximab therapy in a real-life sample of multiple sclerosis patients

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune, neuroinflammatory, and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system. B cells have recently emerged as a promising target to significantly reduce inflammatory disease activity in MS, with successful trial studies using antiCD20 therapies. However, real-life data about safety and efficacy are limited.

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the clinical and radiological inflammatory activity, adherence to therapy, and safety of rituximab (RTX) in an MS patients' sample, treated from 2015 to 2018 in our center PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study on prospectively collected data about relapses, disability progression, and radiological activity (new T2 lesions and Gd-enhancing lesions) were recorded and used to assess no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) at 12 months. RTX-related adverse events were recorded. RTX was administered intravenously at a dosage of 1000 mg twice 2 weeks apart, then every 6 months.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients were included. Fifty-three (76.8%) had a relapsing-remitting, two a primary progressive course, and 14 a secondary progressive course. The mean follow-up period was 16 ± 9.7 months. Thirty-five (50.7%) patients had relapses in the year prior to RTX therapy, with a mean annualized relapse rate of 0.75, significantly reduced to 0.36 at 12 months (p < 0.001). Among the 36 patients included in the study who had an MRI available at 12 months, MRI activity was reduced from 88% (n = 32) to 8.3% (n = 3) at follow-up (p < 0.001). Twelve (17.4%) patients suspended RTX during the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Our real-life experience confirms that off-label therapy with RTX may represent a valid, cost-effective therapeutic option in MS.

Blood neurofilament light levels segregate treatment effects in multiple sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

To determine factors (including the role of specific disease modulatory treatments [DMTs]) associated with (1) baseline, (2) on-treatment, and (3) change (from treatment start to on-treatment assessment) in plasma neurofilament light chain (pNfL) concentrations in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).

METHODS

Data including blood samples analyses and long-term clinical follow-up information for 1,261 Swedish patients with RRMS starting novel DMTs were analyzed using linear regressions to model pNfL and changes in pNfL concentrations as a function of clinical variables and DMTs (alemtuzumab, dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, natalizumab, rituximab, and teriflunomide).

RESULTS

The baseline pNfL concentration was positively associated with relapse rate, Expanded Disability Status Scale score, Age-Related MS Severity Score, and MS Impact Score (MSIS-29), and negatively associated with Symbol Digit Modalities Test performance and the number of previously used DMTs. All analyses, which used inverse propensity score weighting to correct for differences in baseline factors at DMT start, highlighted that both the reduction in pNfL concentration from baseline to on-treatment measurement and the on-treatment pNfL level differed across DMTs. Patients starting alemtuzumab displayed the highest reduction in pNfL concentration and lowest on-treatment pNfL concentrations, while those starting teriflunomide had the smallest decrease and highest on-treatment levels, but also starting from lower values. Both on-treatment pNfL and decrease in pNfL concentrations were highly dependent on baseline concentrations.

CONCLUSION

Choice of DMT in RRMS is significantly associated with degree of reduction in pNfL, which supports a role for pNfL as a drug response marker.

Rituximab Prevents the Development of Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis (EAE): Comparison with Prophylactic, Therapeutic or Combinational Regimens

Objective

To investigate, in detail, the effects of rituximab (RTX), an off-label drug for treating multiple sclerosis (MS) disease on preventing and/or ameliorating experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE).

Methods

Using bioinformatics analysis of publicly available transcriptomics data, we determined the accumulation of B cells, plasma cells and T cells in different compartments of multiple sclerosis patients (MS) and healthy individual brains. Based on these observations and on the literature search, we dosed RTX in EAE mice either orally, or injected intraperitoneally (IP). The latter route was used either prophylactically (asymptomatic stage; upon the induction of the disease), or therapeutically (acute stage; upon the appearance of the first sign of the disease). Further, we used RTX as a preventive drug either as a single agent or in combination with other routes of administration.

Results

Because no complete recovery was observed when RTX was used prophylactically or therapeutically, we devised another protocol of injecting this drug before the onset of the disease and designated this regiment as prevention. We demonstrated that the 20 μg/mouse prevention completely reduced the EAE clinical score, impaired infiltration of T and B cells into the perivascular space of mice brains, along with inhibiting the inflammation and demyelination. However, the 5 and 10 μg/mouse doses although reduced all aspects of inflammation in these mice, their effects were not as potent as the 20 μg/mouse RTX dose. Finally, we combined the 5 μg/mouse prevention treatment with either the prophylactic or therapeutic regimen and observed a robust effect.

Conclusion

We observed that combinatorial regimens resulted in further reduction of inflammation, T and B cell extravasation into the brains of EAE mice and improved the re-myelination.

Established and Emerging Immunological Complications of Biological Therapeutics in Multiple Sclerosis

Biologic immunotherapies have transformed the treatment landscape of multiple sclerosis. Such therapies include recombinant proteins (interferon beta), as well as monoclonal antibodies (natalizumab, alemtuzumab, daclizumab, rituximab and ocrelizumab). Monoclonal antibodies show particular efficacy in the treatment of the inflammatory phase of multiple sclerosis. However, the immunological perturbations caused by biologic therapies are associated with significant immunological adverse reactions. These include development of neutralising immunogenicity, secondary immunodeficiency and secondary autoimmunity. These complications can affect the balance of risks and benefits of biologic agents, and 2018 saw the withdrawal from the market of daclizumab, an anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody, due to concerns about the development of severe, unpredictable autoimmunity. Here we review established and emerging risks associated with multiple sclerosis biologic agents, with an emphasis on their immunological adverse effects. We also discuss the specific challenges that multiple sclerosis biologics pose to drug safety systems, and the potential for improvements in safety frameworks.

Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibodies for Relapsing and Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) was previously thought to be a T-cell-mediated, demyelinating disease of the central nervous system. Disease-modifying therapies targeting T cells have, indeed, shown remarkable efficacy in patients with relapsing-remitting MS. However, these therapies do also target B cells, and a B-cell-depleting monoclonal antibody (ocrelizumab) has recently been approved for MS therapy and is efficacious not only in relapsing forms of MS but also in some patients with primary progressive MS. This suggests that B cells may play a more important role in the pathogenesis of MS than previously appreciated. We review the potential roles of B cells, which are the precursors of antibody-secreting plasma cells in the pathogenesis of MS. Furthermore, we provide an overview of the characteristics and clinical data for the four monoclonal antibodies (ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, rituximab, and ublituximab) that have been approved, are currently been used off-label or are being investigated as treatments for MS. These antibodies all target the cluster of differentiation (CD)-20 molecule and bind to distinct or overlapping epitopes on B cells and a subset of T cells that express CD20. This leads to B-cell depletion and, possibly, to depletion of CD20-positive T cells. The net result is strong suppression of clinical and radiological disease activity as well as slowing of the development of persisting neurological impairment.

Current therapeutic landscape in multiple sclerosis: an evolving treatment paradigm

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To critically assess the current landscape of disease-modifying agents for multiple sclerosis (MS). Treatment algorithms will be discussed and studies for new agents in late development or recently approved are analyzed in terms of their impact on current treatment strategies.

RECENT FINDINGS

A real-world study from Wales suggests that early initiation of highly effective therapy may provide more benefit that an escalation approach in relapsing MS. A study from the MSBase dataset found evidence that early treatment with highly effective therapies decreased the risk of developing secondary progressive MS. Ocrelizumab is highly efficacious in relapsing MS and in a group of patients with primary progressive MS. Another CD20 directed mAb, ofatumumab, is in phase 3. A large study examining extended interval dosing of natalizumab in an attempt to decrease the risk of developing progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy is underway. Cladribine and alemtuzumab may work by immune reconstitution. Siponimod was recently approved by United States Federal Drug Administration for relapsing MS and active secondary progressive MS. Other S1P receptor modulators are being studied in phase 3 trials for relapsing MS. Cladribine received FDA approval as treatment for relapsing and active secondary progressive MS. Autologous hematopoetic stem-cell transplantation may be an option for treatment-refractory MS.

SUMMARY

Development of disease-modifying agents in MS continues to be successful. Treatment algorithms need to take new developments into account.

Treatment of multiple sclerosis - success from bench to bedside

The modern era of multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment began 25 years ago, with the approval of IFNβ and glatiramer acetate for the treatment of relapsing-remitting MS. Ten years later, the first monoclonal antibody, natalizumab, was approved, followed by a third important landmark with the introduction of oral medications, initially fingolimod and then teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate and cladribine. Concomitantly, new monoclonal antibodies (alemtuzumab and ocrelizumab) have been developed and approved. The modern era of MS therapy reached primary progressive MS in 2018, with the approval of ocrelizumab. We have also learned the importance of starting treatment early and the importance of clinical and MRI monitoring to assess treatment response and safety. Treatment decisions should account for disease phenotype, prognostic factors, comorbidities, the desire for pregnancy and the patient's preferences in terms of acceptable risk. The development of treatment for MS during the past 25 years is a fantastic success of translational medicine.

Do clinical trials for new disease modifying treatments include real world patients with multiple sclerosis?

We often see that clinical and demographic characteristics of real-world studies (RWS) do not differ from patients included in randomized controlled trials (RCT).

OBJECTIVE

to compare clinical and demographic aspects of patients included in RCT and RWS that evaluated new disease modifying treatment in multiple sclerosis (MS).

METHODS

a systematic non-language-restricted literature search of RCT and RWS that evaluated new disease modifying treatments (natalizumab, alemtuzumab, ocrelizumab, fingolimod, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate and cladribine) from January 2005 to January 2019. Demographic and clinical data were extracted, described and compared.

RESULTS

18 RCT and 73 RWS were included. We found no differences in clinical and demographic aspects between RCT and RWS except in the frequency of naïve patients included in RCT vs. RWS 65.6% (95%CI 52-74) vs. 36.4% (95%CI 21-46), respectively, (p = 0.013) at study entry, as well as for the inclusion of patients that used previous treatment 34.4% (95%CI 22-41) vs. 63.6% (95%CI 53-74) in RCT and RWS, respectively,(p = 0.007) at study entry.

CONCLUSION

We did not observe significant differences in most clinical and demographic aspects of included patients in RCT and RWS. Studies that include the full spectrum of MS patients followed in clinical practice are needed.

Treatment of multiple sclerosis in special populations: The case of refugees

Multiple sclerosis was long considered a relatively rare entity in the Middle East, but research over the past 10 years and the publication of the Middle East North Africa Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis guidelines for multiple sclerosis have allowed diagnosis and treatment to occur more efficiently. Most of the first and second-line disease-modifying therapies approved by the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicine Agency are available in the Middle East. However, the availability of disease-modifying therapies is quite variable, with some countries having access to all multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapies, while in others there is only one therapeutic option. Economic limitations remain a challenge for the management of multiple sclerosis, especially in countries of war. Moreover, the burden of multiple sclerosis treatment in Syrian and Palestinian refugees is likely high due to the non-availability of funds to cover the high cost of disease-modifying therapies.

Monitoring, Switching, and Stopping Multiple Sclerosis Disease-Modifying Therapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews appropriate monitoring of the various multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying therapies, summarizes the reasons patients switch or stop treatment, and provides a framework for making these management decisions.

RECENT FINDINGS

With the increasing number of highly effective immunotherapies available for MS, the possibility of better control of the disease has increased, but with it, the potential for side effects has rendered treatment decisions more complicated. Starting treatment early with more effective and better-tolerated disease-modifying therapies reduces the likelihood of switching because of breakthrough disease or lack of compliance. Clinical and radiographic surveillance, and often blood and other paraclinical tests, should be performed periodically, depending on the disease-modifying therapy. Helping patients navigate the uncertainty around switching or stopping treatment, either temporarily or permanently, is one of the most important things we do as providers of MS care.

SUMMARY

Ongoing monitoring of drug therapy is a crucial component of long-term MS care. Switching treatments may be necessary for a variety of reasons. Permanent discontinuation of treatment may be appropriate for some patients with MS, although more study is needed in this area.

Minimal breast milk transfer of rituximab, a monoclonal antibody used in neurological conditions

Objective

To determine the transfer of rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody widely used for neurologic conditions, into mature breast milk.

Methods

Breast milk samples were collected from 9 women with MS who received rituximab 500 or 1,000 mg intravenous once or twice while breastfeeding from November 2017 to April 2019. Serial breast milk samples were collected before infusion and at 8 hours, 24 hours, 7 days, and 18–21 days after rituximab infusion in 4 patients. Five additional patients provided 1–2 samples at various times after rituximab infusion.

Results

The median average rituximab concentration in mature breast milk was low at 0.063 μg/mL (range 0.046–0.097) in the 4 patients with serial breast milk collection, with an estimated median absolute infant dose of 0.0094 mg/kg/d and a relative infant dose (RID) of 0.08% (range 0.06%–0.10%). Most patients had a maximum concentration at 1–7 days after infusion. The maximum concentration occurred in a woman with a single breast milk sample and was 0.29 μg/mL at 11 days postinfusion, which corresponds with an estimated RID of 0.33%. Rituximab concentration in milk was virtually undetectable by 90 days postinfusion.

Conclusions

We determined minimal transfer of rituximab into mature breast milk. The RID for rituximab was less than 0.4% and well below theoretically acceptable levels of less than 10%. Low oral bioavailability would probably also limit the absorption of rituximab by the newborn. In women with serious autoimmune neurologic conditions, monoclonal antibody therapy may afford an acceptable benefit to risk ratio, supporting both maternal treatment and breastfeeding.

Comparative discontinuation, effectiveness, and switching practices of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod at 36-month follow-up

BACKGROUND

Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and fingolimod (FTY) are approved oral disease modifying therapies (DMTs) for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). There are currently no known head-to-head studies comparing DMF and FTY over 36 months, which leaves their relative effectiveness unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To assess real-world discontinuation, effectiveness, and switching practices of DMF and FTY over 36 months along with disease activity after switching DMT.

METHODS

Patients prescribed DMF (n = 737) and FTY (n = 535) from two academic MS centers were retrospectively reviewed. Discontinuation and effectiveness outcomes were assessed using propensity score (PS) weighting. PS model covariates included sociodemographics and clinical and MRI characteristics.

RESULTS

Discontinuation was more common in DMF (58.3%) versus FTY (45.2%) over 36 months [OR = 1.81, 95% CI (1.41-2.31), p < .001], largely driven by intolerance [OR = 1.63, 95% CI (1.18-1.73), p < .001]. There were no differences in clinical relapses [OR = 1.27, 95% CI (0.90-1.79), p = .17], gadolinium-enhancing (GdE) lesions [OR = 1.25, 95% CI (0.85-1.84), p = .26], or new T2-hyperintense lesions [OR = 0.99, 95% CI (0.74-1.32), p = .93]. Within 12 months of DMF/FTY discontinuation, switchers to highly effective therapy (HET) versus other DMTs (injectables/orals) had fewer relapses (DMF/HET, 5.9% versus DMF/Other, 14.2%, p = .03; FTY/HET, 11.6% versus FTY/Other, 18.0%, p = .04) and fewer GdE lesions post-FTY (DMF/HET, 10.3% versus DMF/Other, 14.3%, p = .36; FTY/HET, 11.9% versus FTY/Other, 21.5%, p = .04).

CONCLUSION

This combined analysis showed similar effectiveness for DMF and FTY over 36 months with higher DMF discontinuations. Disease activity was lower in switchers to HET versus injectable/oral therapies after DMF/FTY cessation.

B-cell related biomarkers associated with severity of the first demyelinating event of acute optic neuritis

BACKGROUND

Optic neuritis (ON) is the most common cause of acute unilateral visual loss in young adults and frequently occurs as the presenting symptom of multiple sclerosis (MS). Recently, we reported activation of peripheral blood CD19 + ‏ B-cells in the early stage of ON. In the current study we aimed to identify peripheral blood ‏B-cell molecular markers associated with ON severity and visual outcome.

METHODS

Expression of B-cell related biomarkers were analysed in patients with the first clinical presentation of acute unilateral ON. Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR). visual acuity, Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) imaging, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) visual score and visual evoked responses were evaluated at onset and visual acuity and EDSS visual score were repeated at 6 months post-ON.

RESULTS

Thirty patients with acute unilateral ON, 77% female, mean age 33 ± 2.0 years, were enroled in the study. Expression of CD19, CD79A and CD20 B-cell markers significantly correlated with LogMAR visual acuity of the affected eye (r = 0.44, p = 0.01, r = 0.37, p = 0.01 and r = 0.36, p = 0.04, respectively). The marker levels were elevated between 1.5 and 2.2-folds in the group with worse visual acuity (LogMAR>1.0) at onset (CD79A:×1.5, p = 0.013; CD19:×2.25, p = 0.007; CD20:×1.5, p = 0.015) and not correlated with 6 month visual outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patient with a first event of acute ON, expression of B-cell biomarkers correlated with the severity of the disease. These results could add information on the role of B-cell dysfunction in the early stages of ON.

Treatment of multiple sclerosis with rituximab: A multicentric Italian-Swiss experience

BACKGROUND

Rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody leading to B lymphocyte depletion, is increasingly used as an off-label treatment option for multiple sclerosis (MS).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness and safety of rituximab in relapsing-remitting (RR) and progressive MS.

METHODS

This is a multicenter, retrospective study on consecutive MS patients treated off-label with rituximab in 22 Italian and 1 Swiss MS centers. Relapse rate, time to first relapse, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) progression, incidence of adverse events, and radiological outcomes from 2009 to 2019 were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 355/451 enrolled subjects had at least one follow-up visit and were included in the outcome analysis. Annualized relapse rate significantly decreases after rituximab initiation versus the pre-rituximab start year in RRMS (from 0.86 to 0.09, p < .0001) and in secondary-progressive (SP) MS (from 0.34 to 0.06, p < .0001) and had a slight decrease in primary-progressive (PP) MS patients (from 0.12 to 0.07, p = 0.45). After 3 years from rituximab start, the proportion of patients with a confirmed EDSS progression was 14.6% in the RRMS group, 24.7% in the SPMS group, and 41.5% in the PPMS group. No major safety concerns arose.

CONCLUSION

Consistently with other observational studies, our data show effectiveness of rituximab in reducing disease activity in patients with MS.

Comparative effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate as the initial and secondary treatment for MS

Background:

Population-based real-world evidence studies of the effectiveness and tolerability of dimethyl fumarate in relation to common treatment alternatives are still limited.

Objective:

To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and tolerability of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) as the initial and secondary treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients compared with common treatment alternatives in Sweden.

Methods:

We conducted a nationwide retrospective observational cohort study of all RRMS patients identified through the Swedish MS registry initiating DMF ( n = 641) or interferons/glatiramer acetate (IFN/GA; n = 555) as the initial therapy, or DMF ( n = 703) or fingolimod (FGL; n = 194) after switch from IFN/GA between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2016.

Results:

The discontinuation rate was lower with DMF as the initial treatment than IFN/GA (adjusted hazard rate (HR): 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.37–0.58, p < 0.001), but higher than FGL as the secondary treatment (HR: 1.51, CI: 1.08–2.09, p < 0.05). Annualized relapse rate (ARR) was lower with DMF compared to IFN/GA (0.04, CI: 0.03–0.06 vs 0.10, CI: 0.07–0.13; p < 0.05), but not FGL (0.03, CI: 0.02–0.05 vs 0.02, CI: 0.01–0.04; p = 0.41). Finally, time to first relapse (TTFR) was longer with DMF as the initial, but not secondary, therapy ( p < 0.05 and p = 0.20, respectively).

Conclusion:

Our findings indicate that DMF performs better than IFN/GA as the initial treatment for RRMS. Compared to FGL, DMF displayed a lower tolerability, but largely similar effectiveness outcomes.

Observational designs in clinical multiple sclerosis research: Particulars, practices and potentialities

Observational studies investigate a wide range of topics in multiple sclerosis research. This paper presents an overview of the various observational designs and their applications in clinical studies. Observational studies are well suited for making discoveries and assessing new explanations of phenomena, but less so for establishing causal relationships, due to confounding by indication (selection bias), co-morbidity, socio-economic or other factors. Whether observational findings are demonstrative, indicative or only suggestive, depends on the research question, whether and how the design fits this question, analytical techniques, and the quality of data. Observational studies may be cross-sectional vs. longitudinal, and prospective vs. retrospective. The term 'retrograde' is proposed to explicate that cross-sectional studies may obtain data that cover (long) preceding periods. Case reports and case series are usually based on accidental observations or routinely collected data. Cross-sectional studies, by simultaneously assessing clinical phenomena and external factors, enable the discovery and quantification of associations. In ecological studies the unit of analysis is population or group, and relationships on patient level cannot be established. A cohort study is a longitudinal study that investigates patients with a defining characteristic, e.g. diagnosis or specific treatment, by analyzing data acquired at various intervals. Prospective cohort studies use (some) data that are not yet available at the time the research is conceived, whereas in retrospective studies the data already exist. In a case-control study a representative group of patients with a specific clinical feature is compared with controls, and the frequencies at which an external factor, e.g. infection, has occurred in each group is compared; in a nested case-control study controls are drawn from a fully known cohort. Randomized controlled trial (RCT)-extension studies are informative because, due to RCT randomization, they are free from confounding by indication. Patient or disease registries are organised systems for the long-term collection of uniform data on a population that is defined by a particular disease, condition or exposure, with the purpose to study changes over time. In pharmacotherapeutic research, accidental observations of unexpected beneficial effects may lead to further research into a drug's efficacy in other conditions. Uncontrolled phase 1 studies investigate safety and dosing aspects. Observational studies are alternatives to RCTs when these are not feasible for ethical or practical reasons. Phase 4 observational studies play a crucial role in the evaluation of the effectiveness of treatments in daily practice, the validation of RCT-based side effect profiles, and the discovery of late occurring or rare, potentially life-threatening side effects. Combinations of multidisciplinary longitudinal data bases into large data sets enable the development of algorithms for personalized treatments. To improve the reporting of observational findings on treatment effectiveness, it is proposed that abstracts define the research question(s) the study was meant to answer, study design and analytical methods, and identify and quantify the patient population, treatment of interest, relevant outcomes and the study's strengths and limitations. The development of guidelines for Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Effectiveness Research (STROBER), as an extension of the guidelines used in epidemiology, is wanted.

Short-term prediction of secondary progression in a sliding window: A test of a predicting algorithm in a validation cohort

Introduction

The Multiple Sclerosis Prediction Score (MSPS, www.msprediction.com) estimates, for any month during the course of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (MS), the individual risk of transition to secondary progression (SP) during the following year.

Objective

Internal verification of the MSPS algorithm in a derivation cohort, the Gothenburg Incidence Cohort (GIC, n =  144) and external verification in the Uppsala MS cohort (UMS, n = 145).

Methods

Starting from their second relapse, patients were included and followed for 25 years. A matrix of MSPS values was created. From this matrix, a goodness-of-fit test and suitable diagnostic plots were derived to compare MSPS-calculated and observed outcomes (i.e. transition to SP).

Results

The median time to SP was slightly longer in the UMS than in the GIC, 15 vs. 11.5 years (p = 0.19). The MSPS was calibrated with multiplicative factors: 0.599 for the UMS and 0.829 for the GIC; the calibrated MSPS provided a good fit between expected and observed outcomes (chi-square p = 0.61 for the UMS), which indicated the model was not rejected.

Conclusion

The results suggest that the MSPS has clinically relevant generalizability in new cohorts, provided that the MSPS was calibrated to the actual overall SP incidence in the cohort.

Rituximab treatment for multiple sclerosis

Rituximab, a chimeric anti-CD20-antibody, attracts increasing attention as a treatment option for multiple sclerosis (MS). Apart from smaller controlled trials, an increasing number of studies in real-world populations indicate high efficacy based on clinical and neuroradiological outcomes for rituximab in relapsing-remitting MS patients. Additional evidence also demonstrates efficacy of rituximab with treatment of progressive MS phenotypes. In this topical review, we summarize and discuss current evidence on mechanisms of action, efficacy, safety, tolerance and other clinical aspects of rituximab in the treatment of MS. Finally, we will highlight current knowledge gaps and the need for comparative studies with other disease-modifying therapies in MS.

Improving Outcomes in Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis: Current and Emerging Treatments

Pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (MS) comprises 2-5% of MS cases, and is known to be associated with high disease activity and the accumulation of disability at an earlier age than their adult-onset counterparts. Appropriate therapy leading to disease control has the potential to alter the known trajectory of adverse long-term physical, cognitive, and psychosocial outcomes in this population. Thus, optimizing treatment for children and adolescents with MS is of paramount importance. The last decade has seen a growing number of disease-modifying therapies approved for relapsing MS in adults, and available agents now include oral, injectable, and infusion therapies. Recently, the development of randomized controlled MS trials in youth has led to the first agent approved by the US FDA for the treatment of pediatric MS-fingolimod. With this, we have entered a new era of knowledge and treatment in this population and ongoing pediatric trials are expected to further inform clinical management. With the emergence of highly effective therapies targeting the inflammatory component of the disease, there has been increased interest in identifying treatment strategies that instead target mechanisms such as remyelination/repair, neuroprotection, or rehabilitation. The potential role for such emerging therapies in the treatment of pediatric MS remains an important area of study. In this review, we discuss current evidence for MS therapies in children including the treatment of acute relapses, disease-modifying therapies, and symptomatic management. We will also discuss evidence for emerging therapies, including remyelinating and neuroprotective agents.

The emergence of follow-on disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis

Medication prices are a major contributor to the high cost of care for multiple sclerosis. Three generic glatiramer acetate products have regulatory approval in North America, Europe, or Latin America. The pending expiration of patents for other disease-modifying therapies for relapsing multiple sclerosis creates the opportunity for development and regulatory approval of additional follow-on alternatives (generics or biosimilars), potentially providing lower prices and cost savings to payors and patients. However, the complexities of development, regulatory approval, and marketing of follow-on products have some important differences compared to those of new drugs. This topical review provides background and a status update on the development of follow-on disease-modifying medications to treat multiple sclerosis.

Placing CD20-targeted B cell depletion in multiple sclerosis therapeutic scenario: Present and future perspectives

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an acquired demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS) that traditionally has been considered to be mediated primarily by T cells. Increasing evidence, however, suggests the fundamental role of B cells in the pathogenesis and development of the disease. Recently, anti-CD20 B cell-based therapies have demonstrated impressive and somewhat surprising results in MS, showing profound anti-inflammatory effects with a favorable risk-benefit ratio. Moreover, for the first time in the MS therapeutic scenario, the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody ocrelizumab has been granted for the treatment of the primary progressive form of the disease. In this review, we provide a brief overview about anti-CD20 B cell-based therapies in MS, in the perspective of their influence on the future management of the disease, and of their possible positioning in a new wider therapeutic scenario.

Natalizumab, rituximab and fingolimod as escalation therapy in multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Breakthrough disease on first-line injectables in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is a common clinical situation where comparative studies between different escalation therapies are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy, safety and medication persistence of natalizumab (NTZ), rituximab (RTX) and fingolimod (FGL) as escalation therapy in RRMS.

METHODS

Patients switching from interferon or glatiramer acetate to NTZ, RTX or FGL due to breakthrough disease were identified through the Swedish multiple sclerosis (MS) registry at four large MS centers in this retrospective observational study. Data were collected from the MS registry and medical charts. Hazard ratios (HRs) for relapses, adverse events and drug discontinuation with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using multivariable confounder-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

A total of 241 patients were included. The annualized relapse rates were 0.02 for NTZ, 0.03 for RTX and 0.07 for FGL. Compared with NTZ, the adjusted HR for relapse was 1.0 (95% CI, 0.2-5.6) for RTX and 3.4 (95% CI, 1.3-9.2) for FGL. The annualized drug discontinuation rates were 0.15, 0.01 and 0.15 for NTZ, RTX and FGL, respectively. The adjusted HR for drug discontinuation was 0.05 (95% CI, 0.01-0.38) for RTX and 1.0 (95% CI, 0.6-1.7) for FGL vs. NTZ.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with RRMS on interferon/glatiramer acetate with breakthrough disease, switching to NTZ or RTX was associated with less disease activity compared with FGL. RTX displayed superior medication persistence compared with both NTZ and FGL.

Efficacy and safety of rituximab for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies that collectively included 946 patients were selected for the meta-analysis. Rituximab therapy was associated with the mean annualized relapse rates decreasing by 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.45-1.15) and the mean Expanded Disability Status Scale score decreasing by 0.46 (95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.87). The likelihood of patients experiencing a relapse after starting rituximab therapy was only 15% (95% confidence interval, 7%-26%). Although mild-to-moderate adverse events occurred in 29.6% of the patients, there were no severe adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This systematic review and meta-analysis shows that rituximab is associated with reduced annualized relapse rates and disability levels in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. It is also well tolerated and is not associated with serious adverse events.

Emerging small-molecule treatments for multiple sclerosis: focus on B cells

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a major cause of disability in young adults. Following an unknown trigger (or triggers), the immune system attacks the myelin sheath surrounding axons, leading to progressive nerve cell death. Antibodies and small-molecule drugs directed against B cells have demonstrated good efficacy in slowing progression of the disease. This review focusses on small-molecule drugs that can affect B-cell biology and may have utility in disease management. The risk genes for MS are examined from the drug target perspective. Existing small-molecule therapies for MS with B-cell actions together with new drugs in development are described. The potential for experimental molecules with B-cell effects is also considered. Small molecules can have diverse actions on B cells and be cytotoxic, anti-inflammatory and anti-viral. The current B cell-directed therapies often kill B-cell subsets, which can be effective but lead to side effects and toxicity. A deeper understanding of B-cell biology and the effect on MS disease should lead to new drugs with better selectivity, efficacy, and an improved safety profile. Small-molecule drugs, once the patent term has expired, provide a uniquely sustainable form of healthcare.

Rituximab vs placebo induction prior to glatiramer acetate monotherapy in multiple sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether rituximab induction followed by glatiramer acetate (GA) monotherapy is more effective than GA alone for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis with active disease.

METHODS

This was a single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Fifty-five participants were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to either rituximab (R-GA) or placebo (P-GA) induction, followed by GA therapy initiated in all participants. Participants were followed up to 3 years. The primary endpoint was the number of participants with no evidence of disease activity (NEDA): those without relapse, new MRI lesions, and sustained change in disability.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight and 27 participants received rituximab and placebo induction, respectively, with one participant in each arm withdrawing before 6-month MRI. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics. At end of study, 44.44% of R-GA participants demonstrated NEDA vs 19.23% of P-GA participants (p = 0.049). Treatment failed for a smaller proportion of R-GA participants (37.04% R-GA vs 69.23% P-GA, p = 0.019), and time to treatment failure was longer (23.32 months R-GA vs 11.29 months P-GA, p = 0.027). Fewer participants in the R-GA arm had new lesions (25.93% R-GA vs 61.54% P-GA, p = 0.009), and there were fewer new T2 lesions (0.48 R-GA vs 1.96 P-GA, p = 0.027). Probability of demonstrating NEDA in the R-GA arm returned to baseline within the study period. There were no differences in adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Induction therapy with rituximab followed by GA may provide superior efficacy in the short term than GA alone in relapsing multiple sclerosis, but this benefit appears to wane within the study period. Larger studies are needed to assess sustainability of results.

CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER

NCT01569451.

Rituximab in neurological disease: principles, evidence and practice

Rituximab is a widely used B-cell-depleting monoclonal antibody. It is unlicensed for use in neurological disorders and there are no treatment guidelines. However, as a rapidly acting, targeted therapy with growing evidence of efficacy and tolerability in several neuroinflammatory disorders, it is an attractive alternative to conventional immunomodulatory medications. This practical review aims to explain the basic principles of B-cell depletion with therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. We present the evidence for using rituximab in neurological diseases, and describe the practical aspects of prescribing, including dosing, monitoring, safety, treatment failure and its use in special circumstances such as coexisting viral hepatitis, pregnancy and lactation. We provide an administration guide, checklist and patient information leaflet, which can be adapted for local use. Finally, we review the safety data of rituximab and ocrelizumab (a newer and recently licensed B-cell-depleting therapy for multiple sclerosis) and suggest monitoring and risk reduction strategies.

B cell depletion in the treatment of multiple sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system. The latest development of B-cell depletion by anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies has been a large step forward in the treatment of this devastating disease.

AREAS COVERED

In this manuscript, we review mechanisms of action, efficacy, safety, and tolerance of anti-CD20 therapies for MS, including rituximab, ocrelizumab, and ofatumumab.

EXPERT OPINION

B-cell depletion efficiently suppresses acute inflammatory disease activity in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), and may slowdown progression in primary progressive MS (PPMS). The treatment is generally well tolerated, with manageable adverse events related to infusion reactions and infections. Ocrelizumab, a humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, is the first therapy to be approved for the treatment of both RRMS and PPMS.

Natalizumab versus fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis treatment

Objective

To compare 2‐year effectiveness and discontinuation of natalizumab (NTZ) versus fingolimod (FTY) and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS).

Methods

Patients prescribed NTZ, FTY, or DMF at the Rocky Mountain MS Center at University of Colorado were identified. Clinician‐reported data were retrospectively collected. Outcomes include a composite effectiveness measure consisting of new T2 lesion, gadolinium‐enhancing lesion, and/or clinical relapse, individual effectiveness outcomes and discontinuation over 2 years. Logistic regression was used for data analysis on patients matched by propensity scores and using ATT doubly robust weighting estimator.

Results

A total of 451, 271, and 342 patients were evaluated on NTZ, FTY, and DMF over 2 years, respectively. Patients had a mean age of 39.8 (NTZ), 42.5(FTY), and 45.8 (DMF) years; were predominantly female (76.7% NTZ; 72.0% FTY; 69.6% DMF); and had a mean MS disease duration of 11–12 years for all groups. At ≤24 months, 22.2%, 34.7%, and 33.6% experienced a new T2 lesion, gadolinium‐enhancing lesion, and/or clinical relapse on NTZ, FTY, and DMF, respectively. Using ATT doubly robust weighting estimator, FTY versus NTZ and DMF versus NTZ had an odds ratio of 2.00 (95%CI:[1.41–2.85], P < 0.001) and 2.38 [95% CI: 1.68–3.37], P < 0.001) respectively, for experiencing a new T2 lesion, gadolinium enhancing lesion, and/or clinical relapse. At ≤24 months, 32.6%, 34.3%, and 47.1% discontinued NTZ, FTY, and DMF, respectively. The majority of discontinuations were due to becoming JCV positive(12.6%) for NTZ and due to adverse events for both FTY(17%) and DMF(24.0%).

Interpretation

NTZ appears to be more effective and tolerable than FTY and DMF.

Safety and Efficacy of Rituximab in Multiple Sclerosis: A Retrospective Observational Study

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in multiple sclerosis in a clinical practice setting.

Methods

Clinical data for all adult patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) treated with off-label rituximab at a single MS center in Lebanon between March 2008 and April 2017 were retrospectively collected from medical charts. The main efficacy outcomes assessed were annualized relapse rate (ARR) and proportion of patients free from relapses, disability progression, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity.

Results

A total of 89 rituximab-treated patients were included: 59 relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and 30 progressive MS (PMS). Patients were treated with 1000 or 2000 mg rituximab IV every 6-12 months for a mean duration of 22.2 ± 24.8 months. The subjects were 65.2% females with a mean age of 40.5 ± 12.3 years and a mean disease duration of 7.9 ± 6.2 years. During treatment, the ARR decreased from 1.07 at baseline to 0.11 in RRMS (p < 0.0001) and from 0.25 to 0.16 in PMS patients (p = 0.593). The mean Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) remained unchanged in both RRMS and PMS patients. Between baseline and the last follow-up, the percent of patients free from any new MRI lesions increased from 18.6% to 92.6% in the RRMS group and from 43.3% to 82% in the PMS group. No evidence of disease activity (NEDA) was achieved in 74% of patients at 1 year of treatment. A total of 64 adverse events (AEs) (71.9%) were recorded with the most common being infusion-related reactions in 25.8% of patients, all mild in nature. Two of our rituximab-treated patients experienced serious AEs requiring surgical interventions: pyoderma gangrenosum vaginalis with perianal abscess and fistula and an increase in the size of a meningioma. No case of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) was detected.

Conclusion

In our real-world cohort, rituximab was well-tolerated and effective in reducing relapse rate and disability progression in relapsing-remitting and progressive MS patients.

Multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common chronic inflammatory, demyelinating and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system in young adults. This disorder is a heterogeneous, multifactorial, immune-mediated disease that is influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. In most patients, reversible episodes of neurological dysfunction lasting several days or weeks characterize the initial stages of the disease (that is, clinically isolated syndrome and relapsing-remitting MS). Over time, irreversible clinical and cognitive deficits develop. A minority of patients have a progressive disease course from the onset. The pathological hallmark of MS is the formation of demyelinating lesions in the brain and spinal cord, which can be associated with neuro-axonal damage. Focal lesions are thought to be caused by the infiltration of immune cells, including T cells, B cells and myeloid cells, into the central nervous system parenchyma, with associated injury. MS is associated with a substantial burden on society owing to the high cost of the available treatments and poorer employment prospects and job retention for patients and their caregivers.

Ozanimod for the treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Ozanimod is a selective sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1 and 5 modulator under development by Celgene, for the treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. Extensive clinical experience has become available for the related compound fingolimod, favoring the sphingosine 1-phosphate therapeutic concept. Off-target effects have been attributed to its low receptor specificity and have prompted the development of next generation sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators. Areas covered: The authors evaluate the literature of ozanimod, using the PubMed database as well as repositories of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis and the American and European Academy of Neurology. Specifically, the authors cover and discuss the preclinical data on ozanimod, pharmacokinetics and dynamics, and data on efficacy and safety from the pivotal trials. Expert opinion: Superiority of ozanimod over intramuscular interferon β-1a with regard to reduction in annualized relapse rate and magnetic resonance imaging outcomes has been shown in two phase III trials. The beneficial effect on brain volume and gray matter loss are encouraging and in line with data on other newer immunomodulators. Ozanimod is a valuable contribution to the therapeutic armamentarium in MS, although the effect on disability progression is unclear and requires further investigations.

Enforced microglial depletion and repopulation as a promising strategy for the treatment of neurological disorders

Microglia are prominent immune cells in the central nervous system (CNS) and are critical players in both neurological development and homeostasis, and in neurological diseases when dysfunctional. Our previous understanding of the phenotypes and functions of microglia has been greatly extended by a dearth of recent investigations. Distinct genetically defined subsets of microglia are now recognized to perform their own independent functions in specific conditions. The molecular profiling of single microglial cells indicates extensively heterogeneous reactions in different neurological disorders, resulting in multiple potentials for crosstalk with other kinds of CNS cells such as astrocytes and neurons. In settings of neurological diseases it could thus be prudent to establish effective cell‐based therapies by targeting entire microglial networks. Notably, activated microglial depletion through genetic targeting or pharmacological therapies within a suitable time window can stimulate replenishment of the CNS niche with new microglia. Additionally, enforced repopulation through provision of replacement cells also represents a potential means of exchanging dysfunctional with functional microglia. In each setting the newly repopulated microglia might have the potential to resolve ongoing neuroinflammation. In this review, we aim to summarize the most recent knowledge of microglia and to highlight microglial depletion and subsequent repopulation as a promising cell replacement therapy. Although glial cell replacement therapy is still in its infancy and future translational studies are still required, the approach is scientifically sound and provides new optimism for managing the neurotoxicity and neuroinflammation induced by activated microglia.

Impact of trial design and patient heterogeneity on the identification of clinically effective therapies for progressive MS

Clinically effective immunomodulatory therapies have been developed for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), but they have generally not translated to a corresponding slowing of disability accumulation in progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Since disability is multifaceted, progressive patients are heterogeneous, and the drivers of disease progression are still unclear, it has been difficult to identify the most informative outcome measures for progressive trials. Historically, secondary outcome measures have focused on inflammatory measures, which contributed to the recent identification of immunomodulatory therapies benefiting younger patients with more inflammatory progressive MS. Meanwhile, agents capable of treating late-stage disease have remained elusive. Consequently, measures of neurodegeneration are becoming common. Here, we review completed clinical trials testing immunomodulatory therapies in primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) or secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) and discuss the features contributing to trial design variability in relation to trial outcomes, and how efforts toward better patient stratification and inclusion of reliable progression markers could improve outcomes.

Emerging Cellular and Molecular Strategies for Enhancing Central Nervous System (CNS) Remyelination

Myelination is critical for the normal functioning of the central nervous system (CNS) in vertebrates. Conditions in which the development of myelin is perturbed result in severely compromised individuals often with shorter lifespans, while loss of myelin in the adult results in a variety of functional deficits. Although some form of spontaneous remyelination often takes place, the repair process as a whole often fails. Several lines of evidence suggest it is feasible to develop strategies that enhance the capacity of the CNS to undergo remyelination and potentially reverse functional deficits. Such strategies include cellular therapies using either neural or mesenchymal stem cells as well as molecular regulators of oligodendrocyte development and differentiation. Given the prevalence of demyelinating diseases and their effects on the quality of life for affected individuals it is imperative that effective therapies are developed. Here we discuss some of the new approaches to CNS myelin repair that hold promise for reducing the burden of diseases characterized by myelin loss.

Effectiveness and safety of Rituximab in multiple sclerosis: an observational study from Southern Switzerland

Background

Despite positive results from phase II and observational studies, Rituximab (RTX) is not currently approved for multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment and can only be used off-label.

Objective

To characterize MS patients treated with RTX and investigate its effectiveness and safety in a clinical practice setting.

Methods

Observational analysis of data collected from MS patients at the Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland. Relapses, EDSS worsening, MRI lesion accrual and "evidence of disease activity” (EDA) status were described by Cox regression. RTX and natalizumab treated patients were matched by propensity scores.

Results

Out of 453 MS patients, 82 were treated with RTX, 43 (52.4%) relapsing-remitting (RRMS) and 39 (47.6%) progressive MS (median age = 48 [40–54] years, females n = 60 [73.2%], EDSS = 4.0 [2.5–6.0], median follow-up = 1.5 [1.0–2.5] years). Three relapses occurred and 59 (75.6%) patients had not EDA at follow-up end. Time to EDA was similar in RTX and natalizumab treated RRMS patients (HR = 1.64, 95%CI = 0.46–5.85, p = 0.44). Twenty-four patients presented non infusion related adverse events (infections), requiring RTX discontinuation in 6 individuals.

Conclusion

These results provide further evidence for RTX being effective in MS treatment, to a similar extent to natalizumab in RRMS. Clinicians must be vigilant for the potential occurrence of infections.

Coexistence of systemic lupus erythematosus and multiple sclerosis. A case report and literature review

Multiple sclerosis (MS) and systemic lupus erythematous (SLE) are autoimmune diseases, the coexistence of which is uncommon in patients. Owing to the rarity of this condition, the distinction between MS and SLE is a diagnostic challenge for neurologists. We present a case report in which MS and SLE were present in the same patient. There are few case reports in the world on the association between MS and SLE. The following case report is the first of its kind in which both MS and SLE are present in a patient from a country with low prevalence of MS such as Ecuador.

The changing multiple sclerosis treatment landscape: impact of new drugs and treatment recommendations

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to describe the utilization of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) and assess the impact of both the introduction of new drugs and treatment recommendations (local recommendation on rituximab use issued at the largest MS clinic in Stockholm and regional Drug and Therapeutics Committee (DTC) recommendation on how dimethyl fumarate should be used).

METHODS

Interrupted time series analyses using monthly data on all MS patients treated with DMTs in the Stockholm County, Sweden, from January 2011 to December 2017.

RESULTS

There were 4765 individuals diagnosed with MS residing in the Stockholm County from 2011 to 2017. Of these, 2934 (62%) were treated with an MS DMT. Since 2011, fingolimod, alemtuzumab, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, peginterferon beta-1a, and daclizumab were introduced. Only fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate significantly impacted MS DMT utilization. In parallel, the use of rituximab off-label increased steadily, reaching 58% of all DMT-treated MS patients by the end of the study period. The local recommendation on rituximab was associated with an increase in rituximab use. The regional DTC recommendation on dimethyl fumarate was associated with a decrease in dimethyl fumarate use.

CONCLUSIONS

Three MS DMTs-fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate, and rituximab off-label-impacted MS DMT utilization in the Stockholm County. The associations between the treatment recommendations and the subsequent changes in MS DMT utilization indicate that such interventions can influence the uptake and utilization of new drugs used in the specialized care setting.