Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on safety and efficacy of biliary drainage before surgery for obstructive jaundice

The effects of different preoperative biliary drainage methods on complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of different preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) methods on complications in jaundiced patients following pancreaticoduodenectomy. We retrospectively analyzed 270 extrahepatic bile duct cancer patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. A total of 170 patients without PBD treatment were defined as the non-PBD group. According to different PBD methods, 45, 18, and 37 patients were classified into the percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD), endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD), and endoscopic retrograde biliary stent (ERBS) groups, respectively. Clinical characteristics and complications were compared among the 4 groups. Preoperative cholangitis occurred in 14 (8.2%) and 8 (21.6%) patients in the non-PBD and ERBS group, respectively (P = 0.04). Compared with the non-PBD group, delayed gastric emptying (DGE) and wound infection occurred significantly more often in the ERBS group. The incidence of severe complications was significantly lower in the PTBD group than the non-PBD group (P = 0.03). Postoperative hospital stay and complication rates were significantly higher in the ERBS group than the PTBD group. There were no significant differences in complications between ENBD and other groups. In conclusion, PTBD can improve surgical outcomes by reducing severe complication rate in jaundiced patients following pancreaticoduodenectomy. ERBS increased the rates of DGE and wound infection due to high incidence of cholangitis before operative intervention and should be avoided. ENBD carried no special effect on complications and needs further analysis.

Curative-intent surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: prognostic factors for clinical decision making

BACKGROUND

The surgical approach for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) has largely evolved, and increased resectability rates are reported. Large series of patients with resections for HC were published in the last years, and potential predictors for survival were explored. However, the usefulness of these predictors in clinical decision making is controversial.

PURPOSE

The aim of the present review is to explore the main prognostic factors after curative-intent surgery for HC, as emerged from the current literature. Furthermore, the impact of these predictors on clinical decision making is assessed.

CONCLUSION

An aggressive surgical approach has improved the survival rates in patients with HC and implies bile duct resection associated with liver resection and loco-regional lymph node dissection. The AJCC staging system remains the main tool to assess the prognosis after resection of HC. Margin-negative resections and absence of lymph node metastases are the main prognostic factor after curative-intent surgery for HC. Response to chemotherapy is also a prognostic factor. Markers of systemic inflammatory response might predict prognosis of patients with HC, but their usefulness in clinical decision making remains unclear.

Cost-effectiveness of preoperative biliary drainage for obstructive jaundice in pancreatic and periampullary cancer

BACKGROUND

A recent Cochrane Review found that preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) in patients with resectable pancreatic and periampullary cancer undergoing surgery for obstructive jaundice is associated with similar mortality but increased serious morbidity compared with no PBD. Despite this clinical evidence of its lack of effectiveness, PBD is still in use. We considered the economic implications of PBD versus direct surgery for obstructive jaundice in patients with pancreatic and periampullary cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Model-based cost-utility analysis estimating mean costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) per patient from the perspective of the UK National Health Service over a 6-month time horizon. A decision tree model was constructed and populated with probabilities, outcomes, and cost data from published sources. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were undertaken.

RESULTS

PBD was more costly than direct surgery (mean cost per patient £10,775 [$15,616] versus £8221 [$11,914]) and produced fewer QALYs (mean QALYs per patient 0.337 versus 0.343). Not performing PBD would result in cost savings of approximately £2500 ($3623) per patient to the National Health Service. PBD had <10% probability of being cost-effective at a maximum willingness to pay for a QALY of £20,000 ($28,986) to £30,000 ($43,478).

CONCLUSIONS

There are significant cost savings to be gained by avoiding routine PBD in patients with resectable pancreatic and periampullary cancer where PBD is still routinely used in this context; this economic evidence should be used to support the clinical argument for a change in practice.