Vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy for the treatment of adult metastatic Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma

Targeted therapeutic strategies for the management of renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews recent developments in the use of systemic targeted therapies for the treatment of advanced clear and nonclear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The genetic/molecular basis of each form of RCC is discussed and current treatments and clinical trials are described.

RECENT FINDINGS

The treatment of advanced RCC continues to be a major challenge for uro-oncologists. The rapid growth in therapeutic options has brought much needed improvements in overall and progression-free survival, although durable complete responses remain elusive. The recent identification of mutations in genes involved in chromatin remodeling will likely lead to the investigation of whether components of this critical process can also be valid therapeutic targets in clear cell RCC. Similarly, efforts to decipher the molecular mechanisms underlying nonclear cell variants of RCC are beginning to engender novel therapeutic strategies directed against these rarer forms of kidney cancer. Despite the availability of multiple treatment options, several challenges remain: selecting the best first-line or subsequent therapy for a given patient, the optimal sequencing of the various agents available, designing trials with appropriate comparison arms and endpoints, and identifying well tolerated and effective drug combinations.

SUMMARY

Agents targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor and mammalian target of rapamycin pathways remain the mainstay in the management of metastatic RCC. Ongoing and future studies are expected to facilitate the development of therapeutic regimens that incorporate agents with improved tolerability and enhanced efficacy by continuing to capitalize on the strides made by basic and translational scientists in uncovering the mechanisms underlying the various forms of RCC.

[Renal cell carcinoma of patients younger than 40 years old]

CONTEXT

Clinical and pathological characteristics of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) of patients younger than 40 years old are not well known. The objective of this study was to analyze these characteristics by comparison to a group of patients aged 58 to 62.

METHODS

Retrospective study of a group of patients aged less than 40 years old (group 1, n=44) and a group of patients aged 58 to 62 years old (group 2; n=106) treated surgically for a renal mass from January 2000 to July 2009. A comparative analysis of clinical, pathological characteristics and of cancer-specific survival was performed. Specific survival was calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the Log-Rank test. Univariate and multivariable analysis were performed to assess and quantify the effect of age on cancer-specific survival. Covariates were gender, age group, tumor size, pT stage, histological sub-type and Fuhrman grade.

RESULTS

Clinical and pathological characteristics were similar in both groups (P>0.05) except for histological sub-type (56% of clear cell RCC for group 1 versus 82% for group 2). In the group of patients younger than 40 years, translocation RCC represented 23% of all RCCs. Cancer-specific survival at five years was similar in both groups (80% and 76% for group 1 and 2 respectively, P>0.58). Fuhrman grade was the only independent prognostic factor of cancer-specific survival (P=0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients younger than 40 years were more likely to have a translocation RCC than their older counterparts for who clear cell RCC represented the main histological sub-type. Cancer-specific survival was similar between both groups. Only a systematic specific immunostaining for TFE3 or TFEB will allow to assess the exact incidence and prognosis of this entity.

Systemic therapy for metastatic non-clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: recent progress and future directions

Insights into the biology of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) have identified multiple pathways associated with the pathogenesis and progression of this cancer. This progress has led to the development of multiple agents targeting these pathways, including the tyrosine kinase inhibitors sorafenib, sunitinib, and pazopanib, the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab, and the mTOR inhibitors temsirolimus and everolimus. With the exception of temsirolimus, phase 3 trials tested these agents in patients with clear-cell histology; therefore, their efficacy in non-CCRCC is unclear. To date, there is no established effective therapy for patients with advanced non-CCRCC. This article focuses on treatment options for metastatic non-CCRCC.