101
|
Billan S, Kaidar-Person O, Gil Z. Treatment after progression in the era of immunotherapy. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21:e463-e476. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30328-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2020] [Revised: 05/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
102
|
Wang X, Ji Q, Yan X, Lian B, Si L, Chi Z, Sheng X, Kong Y, Mao L, Bai X, Tang B, Li S, Zhou L, Cui C, Guo J. The Impact of Liver Metastasis on Anti-PD-1 Monoclonal Antibody Monotherapy in Advanced Melanoma: Analysis of Five Clinical Studies. Front Oncol 2020; 10:546604. [PMID: 33117684 PMCID: PMC7552942 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.546604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody therapy is becoming a standard treatment for advanced melanoma that produces durable responses and prolonged survival, but the prognosis of patients with liver metastases is still unsatisfactory. Here, we analyzed five clinical studies (second-line or later, JS001-I-PK, CT4, KN151, BGB-A317-102, and SHR-1210-102; performed between 2015 and 2018) of anti-PD-1 monotherapy for advanced melanoma to explore prognostic variables for patients with liver metastases. A total of 168 patients with stage IV melanoma were included, among which 47 had liver metastasis and 121 did not. The objective response rate (ORR) of the no liver metastasis group was significantly higher than that of the liver metastasis group (20.7 vs. 4.3%, P < 0.05). The median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 3.6 months for the patients with liver metastasis and 7.4 months for those without liver metastasis (P < 0.05). The no liver metastasis group also had a longer median overall survival (OS) time than the liver metastasis group (22.8 vs. 15.7 months, P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that liver metastasis was negatively associated with PFS. In the liver metastasis group, compared to metastases in other sites (lymph node, subcutaneous, and lung), liver metastases responded worse to anti-PD-1 monotherapy and were most likely to progress. Intrahepatic progression (defined as an increase in liver metastasis by more than 20% from baseline or having new liver metastases, P < 0.05) was negatively associated with OS, which indicates the need to find a more effective therapy that can target liver metastases. Interestingly, with a median PFS and OS time of 6.0 and 30.9 months, respectively, previous oncolytic virotherapy might bring more benefits to patients with liver metastasis, but confirmation is needed because of the limited number of samples. These findings emphasize that liver metastasis is a poor prognostic factor for advanced melanoma treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy. Further exploration is still needed to find a new treatment approach for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuan Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Renal Cancer and Melanoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Qing Ji
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Renal Cancer and Melanoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Xieqiao Yan
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Renal Cancer and Melanoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Bin Lian
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Renal Cancer and Melanoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Lu Si
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Renal Cancer and Melanoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Zhihong Chi
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Renal Cancer and Melanoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Xinan Sheng
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Renal Cancer and Melanoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Kong
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Renal Cancer and Melanoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Lili Mao
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Renal Cancer and Melanoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Xue Bai
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Renal Cancer and Melanoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Bixia Tang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Renal Cancer and Melanoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Siming Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Renal Cancer and Melanoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Li Zhou
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Renal Cancer and Melanoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Chuanliang Cui
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Renal Cancer and Melanoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Guo
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Renal Cancer and Melanoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
103
|
Ferrara R, Matos I. Atypical patterns of response and progression in the era of immunotherapy combinations. Future Oncol 2020; 16:1707-1713. [PMID: 32687405 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2020-0186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
In the immunoncology era, an acceleration of tumor growth upon immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), defined as hyperprogressive disease (HPD) has been observed across different cancers. Although in non-small-cell lung cancer, most of the available evidence regarding HPD has been reported for patients treated with single agent PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors, in retrospective series a variable proportion of patients receiving ICI combinations also experienced HPD. Similarly, the shape of survival curves and the progression rates in clinical trials testing combinations of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and anti-CTLA-4 agents suggest the occurrence of HPD. Few data are available regarding pseudoprogression upon ICI combinations. However, considering that pseudoprogression has been reported for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents and for CTLA-4 inhibitors separately, it is likely that it may occur also upon combinations of these two classes of drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Ferrara
- Department of Research, Molecular Immunology Unit Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.,Department of Medical Oncology, Thoracic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Ignacio Matos
- Research Department of Haematology, Cancer Immunology Unit, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK.,Vall d´Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
104
|
Sun X, Zhang N, Yin C, Zhu B, Li X. Ultraviolet Radiation and Melanomagenesis: From Mechanism to Immunotherapy. Front Oncol 2020; 10:951. [PMID: 32714859 PMCID: PMC7343965 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Melanoma is the deadliest form of skin cancer, and nearly 90% of melanomas are believed to be caused by ultraviolet radiation (UVR), mainly from sunlight. UVR induces DNA damage, forming products such as cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPD) and 6-4-pyrimidone photoproducts (6-4PP) in a wavelength-dependent manner and causes oxidative DNA damage. These DNA lesions lead to DNA mutations and contribute to the formation of melanoma. In this review, we discuss the protective role of melanocytes against UV-induced DNA damage and how genetic variations, including those in p53 and melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R), or epigenetic histone modifications in melanocytes result in a tendency toward melanoma. We also provide a summary of prevention and treatment strategies against melanoma, including the most recent immunotherapies. Collectively, this work contributes to the understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of UV-induced melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoying Sun
- Department of Dermatology, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Institute of Dermatology, Shanghai Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Na Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Chengqian Yin
- Department of Dermatology, Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Bo Zhu
- Department of Cancer Immunology and Virology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Xin Li
- Department of Dermatology, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Institute of Dermatology, Shanghai Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
105
|
Sung PS, Jang JW, Lee J, Lee SK, Lee HL, Yang H, Nam HC, Lee SW, Bae SH, Choi JY, Han NI, Yoon SK. Real-World Outcomes of Nivolumab in Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in an Endemic Area of Hepatitis B Virus Infection. Front Oncol 2020; 10:1043. [PMID: 32695681 PMCID: PMC7338665 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Real-world results of nivolumab monotherapy against HCC are lacking in the hepatitis B virus (HBV)-endemic, Asia-Pacific regions. Moreover, heterogeneous responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors have rarely been described in advanced HCC. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab monotherapy in a real-world setting in 33 Korean patients with unresectable HCC. In our cohort, twenty-nine patients (88%) showed HBsAg positivity. At the time of nivolumab initiation, 4 among 33 patients (12%) were classified as Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC)-B stage and 29 (88%) as BCLC-C stage, respectively. Prior sorafenib treatment was given to 31 (94%) patients, and 13 (39%) received prior regorafenib treatment. For the liver reserve, patients were classified as Child-Pugh class A (79%) and B (21%), respectively. Grade 3 toxicities occurred in one patient, who developed pneumonitis after 5 cycles of nivolumab treatment. Best overall responses were complete response in 2 patients out of the 33 enrolled patients (6%), partial response in 4 patients (12%) and stable disease in 4 patients (12%). With 29 patients having images for the response evaluation, the objective response rate was 21.4%. The median overall survival (OS) of the cohort was 26.4 weeks (range 2.3-175.1). Achieving objective responses, pre-treatment small tumors (maximal diameter <5 cm) and favorable liver function as assessed by Albumin-Bilirubin grade were significant factors for the favorable OS. Interestingly, differential responses to nivolumab among multiple tumors in a single patient were noted in 6 patients (18%). In these patients, small metastatic tumors were regressed, although their larger tumors did not respond to nivolumab monotherapy. In summary, nivolumab treatment seems clinically efficacious in treating unresectable HCC in an endemic area of HBV infection. Further prospective evaluation is required to overcome the heterogeneous efficacy of nivolumab monotherapy according to the baseline tumor burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pil Soo Sung
- The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jeong Won Jang
- The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jaejun Lee
- The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Soon Kyu Lee
- The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hae Lim Lee
- The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hyun Yang
- The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hee Chul Nam
- The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sung Won Lee
- The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Si Hyun Bae
- The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jong Young Choi
- The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Nam Ik Han
- The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seung Kew Yoon
- The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
106
|
Neuwirth MG, Bartlett EK. Timing Is Everything: Could Surveillance Imaging Intensity Influence Survival in High-Risk Melanoma? Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:3577-3578. [PMID: 32468351 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08633-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Madalyn G Neuwirth
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Edmund K Bartlett
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA. .,Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, Suite H-1215, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
107
|
Transcriptional downregulation of MHC class I and melanoma de- differentiation in resistance to PD-1 inhibition. Nat Commun 2020; 11:1897. [PMID: 32312968 PMCID: PMC7171183 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15726-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2019] [Accepted: 03/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcriptomic signatures designed to predict melanoma patient responses to PD-1 blockade have been reported but rarely validated. We now show that intra-patient heterogeneity of tumor responses to PD-1 inhibition limit the predictive performance of these signatures. We reasoned that resistance mechanisms will reflect the tumor microenvironment, and thus we examined PD-1 inhibitor resistance relative to T-cell activity in 94 melanoma tumors collected at baseline and at time of PD-1 inhibitor progression. Tumors were analyzed using RNA sequencing and flow cytometry, and validated functionally. These analyses confirm that major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I downregulation is a hallmark of resistance to PD-1 inhibitors and is associated with the MITFlow/AXLhigh de-differentiated phenotype and cancer-associated fibroblast signatures. We demonstrate that TGFß drives the treatment resistant phenotype (MITFlow/AXLhigh) and contributes to MHC class I downregulation in melanoma. Combinations of anti-PD-1 with drugs that target the TGFß signaling pathway and/or which reverse melanoma de-differentiation may be effective future therapeutic strategies. A significant proportion of patients develop innate or acquired resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Here, the authors show that resistance to anti-PD-1 blockade is associated with TGF-beta driven major histocompatibility complex I (MHCI) down-regulation and a de-differentiated phenotype in melanoma patients.
Collapse
|
108
|
Schoenfeld AJ, Hellmann MD. Acquired Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Cancer Cell 2020; 37:443-455. [PMID: 32289269 PMCID: PMC7182070 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 437] [Impact Index Per Article: 109.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Revised: 03/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have rapidly altered the treatment landscape for multiple tumor types, providing unprecedented survival in some patients. Despite the characteristic durability of response to ICI, unfortunately many patients with initial response will later develop acquired resistance. The current understanding of mechanisms of acquired resistance to ICIs is remarkably limited, perhaps restraining effective development of next-generation immunotherapies. Here, we examine the barriers to progress and emerging clinical reports interrogating acquired resistance with the goal to facilitate efforts to overcome acquired resistance to ICIs in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam J Schoenfeld
- Thoracic Oncology Service, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Matthew D Hellmann
- Thoracic Oncology Service, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
109
|
Hirshoren N, Yoeli R, Cohen JE, Weinberger JM, Kaplan N, Merims S, Peretz T, Lotem M. Checkpoint inhibitors: Better outcomes among advanced cutaneous head and neck melanoma patients. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0231038. [PMID: 32282861 PMCID: PMC7153888 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2019] [Accepted: 03/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate if the treatment outcomes of checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) in patients with advanced-stage skin head and neck melanoma (HNM) differs from outcomes in patients with non-HNM. DESIGN A retrospective cohort study of patients with unresectable AJCC stage III and stage IV, who received CPI between 2010 and 2017. PARTICIPANTS Overall, 122 unresectable AJCC stage III and metastatic stage IV melanoma adult patients were treated with CPI during the study period (consecutive patients). The HNM group of patients was comparable with limbs and trunk melanoma group except different distant metastatic (M1a/b/c/d) pattern (p = 0.025). MAIN OUTCOMES Comparison of overall survival and clinical response to CPI in patients with advanced-stage skin melanoma of the head and neck with non-HNM. RESULTS We analyzed 38 patients with melanoma arising in the head and neck skin regions, 33 with melanoma of limbs and 51 with trunk melanoma. Most of the head and neck patients were men (89.5%), the average age of melanoma diagnosis was 61.4±16.7 years (range 16.4-85.6). More than a third of HNM group of patients (36.8%) were 70 years and older. Overall response rate (ORR) to CPI was 50% (CR 31.6% and PR 18.4%) in the head and neck study group of patients, compared to an ORR of 36.3% and 23.5% in melanoma of the limbs and of the trunk, respectively (p = 0.03). The median overall survival of HNM group of patients was 60.2±6.3 months, CI 95% [47.7-72.7], 63% were alive at 30 months, reaching a plateau. Whereas, the median survival time of limbs and trunk melanoma were 51.2 and 53.4 months, which did not reach significance. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Response rate to CPI is significantly improved in patients with melanoma of the head and neck and they have a trend towards improved, long standing, overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nir Hirshoren
- Department of Otolaryngology / Head & Neck Surgery, Hadassah Hebrew-University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Roni Yoeli
- Department of Otolaryngology / Head & Neck Surgery, Hadassah Hebrew-University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Jonathan E Cohen
- Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah Hebrew-University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
- The Faculty of Medicine, The Wohl institute for Translational Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, Hadassah Hebrew-University Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Jeffrey M Weinberger
- Department of Otolaryngology / Head & Neck Surgery, Hadassah Hebrew-University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Nadia Kaplan
- Radiology department, Hadassah Hebrew-University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Sharon Merims
- Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah Hebrew-University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Tamar Peretz
- Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah Hebrew-University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Michal Lotem
- Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah Hebrew-University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
110
|
MDM2, MDM4 and EGFR Amplifications and Hyperprogression in Metastatic Acral and Mucosal Melanoma. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12030540. [PMID: 32110946 PMCID: PMC7139387 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12030540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2020] [Revised: 02/21/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mucosal and acral melanoma respond worse to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) than cutaneous melanoma. MDM2/4 as well as EGFR amplifications are supposed to be associated with hyperprogression on ICI in diverse cancers. We therefore investigated the response of metastatic acral and mucosal melanoma to ICI in regard to MDM2/4 or EGFR amplifications and melanoma type. METHODS We conducted a query of our melanoma registry, looking for patients with metastatic acral or mucosal melanoma treated by ICI. Whole exome sequencing, FISH and immunohistochemistry on melanoma tissue could be performed on 45 of the total cohort of 51 patients. Data were correlated with patients` responses to ICI and survival. RESULTS 22 out of 51 patients had hyperprogressive disease (an increase in tumor load of >50% at the first staging). Hyperprogression occurred more often in case of MDM2/4 or EGFR amplification or <1% PD-L1 positive tumor cells. Nevertheless, this association was not significant. Interestingly, the anorectal melanoma type and the presence of liver metastases were significantly associated with worse survival. CONCLUSIONS So far, we found no reliable predictive marker for patients who develop hyperprogression on ICI, specifically with regard to MDM2/4 or EGFR amplifications. Nevertheless, patients with anorectal melanoma, liver metastases or melanoma with amplified MYC seem to have an increased risk of not benefitting from ICI.
Collapse
|
111
|
Ferrone S, Whiteside TL. Targeting CSPG4 for isolation of melanoma cell-derived exosomes from body fluids. HNO 2020; 68:100-105. [PMID: 32006045 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-019-00811-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
This manuscript describes the functional properties of the exosomes released from melanoma cells. It details the characteristics of the tumor antigen chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 4 (CSPG4), which is used as a marker to separate exosomes released by melanoma cells from exosomes released by nonmalignant cells. The results are discussed in view of the potential role of melanoma cell-derived exosomes in the escape of malignant cells from the host's immune system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Ferrone
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, 02114, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - T L Whiteside
- Departments of Pathology, Immunology and Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, 15213, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
112
|
Diefenbach RJ, Lee JH, Strbenac D, Yang JYH, Menzies AM, Carlino MS, Long GV, Spillane AJ, Stretch JR, Saw RPM, Thompson JF, Ch’ng S, Scolyer RA, Kefford RF, Rizos H. Analysis of the Whole-Exome Sequencing of Tumor and Circulating Tumor DNA in Metastatic Melanoma. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11121905. [PMID: 31795494 PMCID: PMC6966626 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11121905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2019] [Revised: 10/31/2019] [Accepted: 11/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to monitor cancer progression and response to therapy has significant potential but there is only limited data on whether this technique can detect the presence of low frequency subclones that may ultimately confer therapy resistance. In this study, we sought to evaluate whether whole-exome sequencing (WES) of ctDNA could accurately profile the mutation landscape of metastatic melanoma. We used WES to identify variants in matched, tumor-derived genomic DNA (gDNA) and plasma-derived ctDNA isolated from a cohort of 10 metastatic cutaneous melanoma patients. WES parameters such as sequencing coverage and total sequencing reads were comparable between gDNA and ctDNA. The mutant allele frequency of common single nucleotide variants was lower in ctDNA, reflecting the lower read depth and minor fraction of ctDNA within the total circulating free DNA pool. There was also variable concordance between gDNA and ctDNA based on the total number and identity of detected variants and this was independent of the tumor biopsy site. Nevertheless, established melanoma driver mutations and several other melanoma-associated mutations were concordant between matched gDNA and ctDNA. This study highlights that WES of ctDNA could capture clinically relevant mutations present in melanoma metastases and that enhanced sequencing sensitivity will be required to identify low frequency mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Russell J. Diefenbach
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia; (R.J.D.); (J.H.L.)
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia; (A.M.M.); (M.S.C.); (G.V.L.); (A.J.S.); (J.R.S.); (R.P.M.S.); (J.F.T.); (S.C.); (R.A.S.); (R.F.K.)
| | - Jenny H. Lee
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia; (R.J.D.); (J.H.L.)
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia; (A.M.M.); (M.S.C.); (G.V.L.); (A.J.S.); (J.R.S.); (R.P.M.S.); (J.F.T.); (S.C.); (R.A.S.); (R.F.K.)
| | - Dario Strbenac
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; (D.S.); (J.Y.H.Y.)
| | - Jean Y. H. Yang
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; (D.S.); (J.Y.H.Y.)
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Alexander M. Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia; (A.M.M.); (M.S.C.); (G.V.L.); (A.J.S.); (J.R.S.); (R.P.M.S.); (J.F.T.); (S.C.); (R.A.S.); (R.F.K.)
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia
| | - Matteo S. Carlino
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia; (A.M.M.); (M.S.C.); (G.V.L.); (A.J.S.); (J.R.S.); (R.P.M.S.); (J.F.T.); (S.C.); (R.A.S.); (R.F.K.)
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
- Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - Georgina V. Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia; (A.M.M.); (M.S.C.); (G.V.L.); (A.J.S.); (J.R.S.); (R.P.M.S.); (J.F.T.); (S.C.); (R.A.S.); (R.F.K.)
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia
| | - Andrew J. Spillane
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia; (A.M.M.); (M.S.C.); (G.V.L.); (A.J.S.); (J.R.S.); (R.P.M.S.); (J.F.T.); (S.C.); (R.A.S.); (R.F.K.)
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia
| | - Jonathan R. Stretch
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia; (A.M.M.); (M.S.C.); (G.V.L.); (A.J.S.); (J.R.S.); (R.P.M.S.); (J.F.T.); (S.C.); (R.A.S.); (R.F.K.)
| | - Robyn P. M. Saw
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia; (A.M.M.); (M.S.C.); (G.V.L.); (A.J.S.); (J.R.S.); (R.P.M.S.); (J.F.T.); (S.C.); (R.A.S.); (R.F.K.)
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - John F. Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia; (A.M.M.); (M.S.C.); (G.V.L.); (A.J.S.); (J.R.S.); (R.P.M.S.); (J.F.T.); (S.C.); (R.A.S.); (R.F.K.)
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Sydney Ch’ng
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia; (A.M.M.); (M.S.C.); (G.V.L.); (A.J.S.); (J.R.S.); (R.P.M.S.); (J.F.T.); (S.C.); (R.A.S.); (R.F.K.)
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Richard A. Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia; (A.M.M.); (M.S.C.); (G.V.L.); (A.J.S.); (J.R.S.); (R.P.M.S.); (J.F.T.); (S.C.); (R.A.S.); (R.F.K.)
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
- Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Richard F. Kefford
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia; (A.M.M.); (M.S.C.); (G.V.L.); (A.J.S.); (J.R.S.); (R.P.M.S.); (J.F.T.); (S.C.); (R.A.S.); (R.F.K.)
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Helen Rizos
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia; (R.J.D.); (J.H.L.)
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia; (A.M.M.); (M.S.C.); (G.V.L.); (A.J.S.); (J.R.S.); (R.P.M.S.); (J.F.T.); (S.C.); (R.A.S.); (R.F.K.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +61-298-502-762
| |
Collapse
|