Repair of porcine articular cartilage defect with a biphasic osteochondral composite

Repair of articular cartilage defects: review and perspectives

Articular cartilage defects heal poorly and lead to catastrophic degenerative arthritis. Clinical experience has indicated that no existing medication substantially promotes the healing process and the cartilage defect requires surgical replacement, preferably with an autograft. However, there is a shortage of articular cartilage that can be donated for autografting. A review of previous unsuccessful experiences reveals the reason for the current strategy to graft cartilage defects with regenerated cartilage. Autologous cartilage regeneration is a cell-based therapy in which autogenous chondrocytes or other chondrogenic cells are cultured to constitute cartilaginous tissue according to the principles of tissue engineering. Current studies are concentrating on improving such techniques from the three elements of tissue engineering, namely the cells, biomaterial scaffolds, and culture conditions. Some models of articular cartilage regeneration have yielded good repair of cartilage defects, in animal models and clinical settings, but the overall results suggest that there is room for improvement of this technique before its routine clinical application. Autologous cartilage regeneration remains the mainstay for repairing articular cartilage defects but more studies are required to optimize the efficacy of regeneration. A more abundant supply of more stable cells, i.e. capable of maintaining the phenotype of chondrogenesis, has to be identified. Porous scaffolds of biocompatible, biodegradable materials that maintain and support the presentation of the chondrogenic cells need to be fabricated. If the cells are not implanted early to allow their in vivo constitution of cartilage, a suitable in vitro cultivation method has to be devised for a consistent yield of regenerative cartilage.

Success rates and immunologic responses of autogenic, allogenic, and xenogenic treatments to repair articular cartilage defects

This review examines current approaches available for articular cartilage repair, not only in terms of their regeneration potential, but also as a function of immunologic response. Autogenic repair techniques, including osteochondral plug transplantation, chondrocyte implantation, and microfracture, are the most widely accepted clinical treatment options due to the lack of immunogenic reactions, but only moderate graft success rates have been reported. Although suspended allogenic chondrocytes are shown to evoke an immune response upon implantation, allogenic osteochondral plugs and tissue-engineered grafts using allogenic chondrocytes exhibit a tolerable immunogenic response. Additionally, these repair techniques produce neotissue with success rates approaching those of currently available autogenic repair techniques, while simultaneously obviating their major hindrance of donor tissue scarcity. To date, limited research has been performed with xenogenic tissue, although several studies demonstrate the potential for its long-term success. This article focuses on the various treatment options for cartilage repair and their associated success rates and immunologic responses.

Treatment of osteochondral defects of the talus

This review article provides a current concepts overview of osteochondral defects of the talus, with special emphasis on treatment options, their indications and future developments. Osteochondral defects of the talar dome are mostly caused by a traumatic event. They may lead to deep ankle pain on weight-bearing, prolonged swelling, diminished range of motion and synovitis. Plain radiographs may disclose the lesion. For further diagnostic evaluation, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have demonstrated similar accuracy. Computed tomography is preferred for preoperative planning. Treatment options are diverse and up to the present there is no consensus. Based on the current literature, we present a treatment algorithm that is mainly guided by the size of the lesion. Asymptomatic or low-symptomatic lesions are treated nonoperatively. The primary surgical treatment of defects up to 15 mm in diameter consists of arthroscopic debridement and bone marrow stimulation. For large cystic talar lesions, retrograde drilling combined with a bone graft is an important alternative. In adolescents or in (sub)acute situations, in which the fragment is 15 mm or larger, fixation of the fragment is preferred. Osteochondral autograft transfer and autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), with or without a cancellous bone graft, are recommended for secondary cases as well as large lesions.

The effect of devitalized trabecular bone on the formation of osteochondral tissue-engineered constructs

In the current study, evidence is presented demonstrating that devitalized trabecular bone has an inhibitory effect on in vitro chondral tissue development when used as a base material for the tissue-engineering of osteochondral constructs for cartilage repair. Chondrocyte-seeded agarose hydrogel constructs were cultured alone or attached to an underlying bony base in a chemically defined medium formulation that has been shown to yield engineered cartilaginous tissue with native Young's modulus (E(Y)) and glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content. By day 42 in culture the incorporation of a bony base significantly reduced these properties (E(Y)=87+/-12 kPa, GAG=1.9+/-0.8%ww) compared to the gel-alone group (E(Y)=642+/-97 kPa, GAG=4.6+/-1.4%ww). Similarly, the mechanical and biochemical properties of chondrocyte-seeded agarose constructs were inhibited when co-cultured adjacent to bone (unattached), suggesting that soluble factors rather than direct cell-bone interactions mediate the chondro-inhibitory bone effects. Altering the method of bone preparation, including demineralization, or the timing of bone introduction in co-culture did not ameliorate the effects. In contrast, osteochondral constructs with native cartilage properties (E(Y)=730+/-65 kPa, GAG=5.2+/-0.9%ww) were achieved when a porous tantalum metal base material was adopted instead of bone. This work suggests that devitalized bone may not be a suitable substrate for long-term cultivation of osteochondral grafts.