Robotic facelift thyroidectomy: II. Clinical feasibility and safety

Contemporary surgical techniques

Recent technologic advances have engendered alternative and innovative approaches to thyroid surgery aimed at reducing cosmetic sequelae. Minimally invasive techniques via small anterior cervical incisions hidden in natural skin creases and remote access approaches that eliminate anterior neck incisions entirely have emerged as viable options for patients who regard cosmesis as a priority. The safe application of these techniques to both benign and malignant thyroid disease has been evaluated.

Modified robotic-assisted thyroidectomy: an initial experience with the retroauricular approach

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

New approaches for robotic-assisted thyroidectomy, including the retroauricular approach, were recently described. We have modified the established surgical approach for retroauricular robotic thyroidectomy. Herein, we report our initial experience to identify challenges and limitations of this new surgical approach.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective case series.

METHODS

This study was performed under institutional review board approval for patients who underwent retroauricular robotic hemithyroidectomy at an academic North American institution. The retroauricular approach was modified by using the space between the two heads of the sternocleidomastoid muscle as our working space. Additionally, selected patients underwent concomitant neck lift surgery with robotic thyroid surgery. Clinical characteristics, total operative time, blood loss, surgical outcomes, and length of hospital stay were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twelve female patients were included in this study. Mean age was 45 ± 4.43 years, and mean body mass index was 28.6 ± 2.15. Mean thyroid nodule size was 1.15 ± 0.26 cm(3). All cases were completed successfully via single retroauricular incision. There was no conversion to an open approach. Four out of 12 patients (33%) underwent additional concomitant neck lift surgery, with a mean total operative time of 156 ± 15.88 minutes. The mean operative time for the remaining eight patients who underwent the robotic approach without additional neck lift surgery was 145.4 ± 10.08 minutes. There were no cases of permanent vocal cord paralysis or permanent hypoparathyroidism. Mean blood loss was 22.4 ± 4.32 mL. Four patients (33%) were discharged home on the same day of surgery, and the remaining eight patients were discharged after an overnight stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-incision retroauricular robotic hemithyroidectomy can be a safe and feasible alternative to other remote access techniques. Neck lift surgery can be performed safely in a select group of patients. However, future studies are warranted to further evaluate the benefits and limitations of this novel approach.

Alternative approaches to the thyroid gland

Advances in surgical technology and patient-driven demands have fueled exploration into methods to improve cosmetic outcomes in thyroid surgery. This exploration has produced 2 fundamentally different pathways for reducing the visible thyroidectomy scar. Minimally invasive anterior cervical approaches use small incisions hidden in natural skin creases and reduce the overall extent of dissection required to remove the thyroid. Remote access approaches remove the incision from the anterior neck completely but require more extensive dissection to access the thyroid compartment.

Robotic Selective Neck Dissection by a Postauricular Facelift Approach

Objectives

The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of robot-assisted neck dissection by a postauricular facelift approach in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), compared with conventional neck dissection.

Study Design

Case series with chart review.

Setting

University tertiary care hospital.

Subjects and Methods

Thirty HNSCC patients with clinically node negative necks (cN0) who underwent robot-assisted selective neck dissection (SND) by a postauricular facelift approach (11 patients, 12 necks) or conventional neck dissection (19 patients, 21 necks).

Results

The mean age was lower in the robotic group ( P = .030). However, the distributions of gender and TNM stage did not differ between the two groups. The robotic SND was completed successfully in all patients. The mean operative time was longer in the robotic group (215 ± 56 min) than the conventional group (144 ± 43 min) ( P < .001). The mean numbers of lymph nodes removed were 25.0 ± 7.4 and 28.9 ± 8.2 in the robotic and conventional group, respectively ( P = .192), and the number of lymph nodes removed at each level also did not differ between the 2 groups. In addition, there was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the 2 groups, but cosmetic satisfaction was higher in the robot group ( P = .002).

Conclusions

Robot-assisted SND by a postauricular facelift approach is comparable to conventional neck dissection in selected patients with cN0 HNSCC and results in excellent postoperative cosmesis.

Current trends in robotic surgery for otolaryngology

As minimally invasive surgery has become common in head and neck surgery, the role of robotic surgery has expanded from thyroid surgery and transoral robotic surgery (TORS) of the oropharynx and supraglottic to other areas. Surgeons have advanced the limits of TORS, adapting lasers to the Da Vinci robot for glottic cancer, and combining existing techniques for transoral supraglottic laryngectomy and hypopharyngectomy to perform transoral total laryngectomy. Skull base approaches have been reported with some success in case reports and cadaver models, but the current instrument size and configuration limit the applicability of the current robotic system. Surgeons have reported reconstruction of the head and neck via local and free flaps. Using the previously reported approaches for thyroidectomy via modified facelift incision, neck dissection has also been reported. Future applications of robotic surgery in otolaryngology may be additionally expanded, as several new robotic technologies are under development for endolaryngeal work and neurotology.

Single-incision transaxillary robotic thyroidectomy: challenges and limitations in a North American population

OBJECTIVE

We reviewed our initial experience with robotic thy-roidectomy to identify challenges and limitations of this new surgical approach when applied to a North American population.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series.

SETTING

Academic institution.

SUBJECTS/METHODS

Retrospective review of 18 consecutive robotic thyroid lobectomies performed from February 2010 to April 2012 involving 16 female patients. Two patients underwent robot-assisted completion thyroidectomy a few months following the initial thyroid surgery, one for cancer and the other for goiter.

RESULTS

Median age was 47.5 years (range, 18-62 years), and median body mass index was 28.7 (range, 19.4-44.5). Median thyroid nodule size was 2.9 cm (range, 1.1-4.7 cm). All but 1 case (6%) was performed successfully via single axillary incision. There was no conversion to an open approach. Median operative time was 170 minutes (range, 95-220 minutes), and median blood loss was 12.5 mL (range, 5-75 mL). Complications occurred in 4 cases (22%) to include temporary vocal cord pareses (n = 3) and a postoperative hematoma that required exploration. Median hospital stay was 2 days (range, 1-3 days).

CONCLUSION

Single-incision transaxillary robotic thyroidectomy can be technically challenging in North American patients with a larger body frame due to difficulty in optimal placement of all 4 robotic instruments via a single axillary incision. All 3 cases of temporary vocal cord paresis occurred early in our experience and may have been due to our relative inexperience with this new approach and associated instrumentation. Other limitations include less than optimal visualization of the recurrent laryngeal nerve in the contralateral lobe as well as poor access to the substernal region.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Qualitative and quantitative differences between 2 robotic thyroidectomy techniques

OBJECTIVES

Two distinct remote access robotic thyroidectomy techniques were implemented in a high-volume endocrine surgery practice. Important technical and clinical differences were observed and are described.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study with planned data collection.

SETTING

Thyroid center.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A panel of demographic and clinical parameters was captured in a series of patients undergoing 1 of 2 robotic thyroidectomy techniques (robotic axillary thyroidectomy [RAT] or robotic facelift thyroidectomy [RFT]). Particular attention was paid to time of surgery, ease of dissection, complications, use of drains, and length of stay.

RESULTS

Fifteen robotic hemithyroidectomies were accomplished by either RAT (n = 5) or RFT (n = 10). The duration of surgery for RAT averaged 196 ± 38.1 minutes, with no clear downward trend observed. The mean time of surgery for RFT was 156.9 ± 16.3 minutes, with a steady trend toward shorter surgical times. All 5 RAT patients were managed with drains and as inpatients (length of stay = 1.0 days); 9 of 10 RFT patients were managed without drains and on an outpatient basis (the first patient had a drain and was observed for 1 night in the hospital; P < .001). Ease of surgery, familiarity with anatomic dissection planes, and surgeon comfort level all favored RFT.

CONCLUSIONS

In an early experience of a small series of patients, a more rapid learning curve reflected by shorter operative times was observed with robotic facelift thyroidectomy compared with robotic axillary thyroidectomy. Furthermore, the vast majority of patients could be managed as outpatients, which represents one of several apparent advantages.

Functional voice and swallowing outcomes after robotic thyroidectomy by a gasless unilateral axillo-breast approach: comparison with open thyroidectomy

BACKGROUND

Voice and swallowing alterations are common complaints after thyroidectomy, even in the absence of laryngeal nerve impairment. However, voice and swallowing functions after robotic thyroidectomy have not been thoroughly investigated. This study compared the functional outcomes for voice and swallowing after robotic thyroidectomy and conventional open thyroidectomy.

METHODS

The study prospectively analyzed the voice and swallowing functions of patients with thyroid nodules who underwent robotic thyroidectomy by a gasless unilateral axillo-breast (GUAB) approach (50 cases) or by conventional open thyroidectomy (61 cases) from September 2009 to October 2010. Videolaryngostroboscopy or flexible laryngoscopy was performed pre- and postoperatively. Subjective voice and swallowing alterations were assessed by questionnaire preoperatively and then 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. In addition, objective acoustic voice analysis was performed using a Multidimensional Voice Program, with Voice Range Profiles and maximum phonation times measured preoperatively and then 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Subjective postoperative voice function was significantly better in the robotic group at 1 day, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively than in the open group. The mean values of fundamental frequency, jitter, shimmer and noise-to-harmonic ratio before and after surgery did not differ between the two groups. However, the frequency range and the highest frequency were significantly better in the robotic group than in the open group at 3 months postoperatively. Subjective swallowing function did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative voice function is better with robotic thyroidectomy using the GUAB approach than with conventional open thyroidectomy. This is an advantage of robotic thyroidectomy by the GUAB approach in addition to the excellent cosmesis.

Minimally invasive techniques for head and neck malignancies: current indications, outcomes and future directions

The trend toward minimally invasive surgery, appropriately applied, has evolved over the past three decades to encompass all fields of surgery, including curative intent cancer surgery of the head and neck. Proper patient and tumor selection are fundamental to optimizing oncological and functional outcomes in such a personalized approach to cancer treatment. Training, experience, and appropriate technological equipment are prerequisites for any type of minimally invasive surgery. The aim of this review was to provide an overview of currently available techniques and the evidence justifying their use. Much evidence is in favor of routine use of transoral laser resection, transoral robot-assisted surgery, transnasal endoscopic resection, sentinel node biopsy, and endoscopic neck surgery for selected malignant tumors, by experienced surgical teams. Technological advances will enhance the scope of this type of surgery in the future and physicians need to be aware of the current applications and trends.