The trigeminally evoked blink reflex. I. Neuronal circuits

Encoding of corneal input in two distinct regions of the spinal trigeminal nucleus in the rat: cutaneous receptive field properties, responses to thermal and chemical stimulation, modulation by diffuse noxious inhibitory controls, and projections to the parabrachial area

To determine whether corneal input is processed similarly at rostral and caudal levels of the spinal trigeminal nucleus, the response properties of second-order neurons at the transition between trigeminal subnucleus interpolaris and subnucleus caudalis (Vi/Vc) and at the transition between subnucleus caudalis and the cervical spinal cord (Vc/C1) were compared. Extracellular single units were recorded in 68 Sprague-Dawley rats under chloralose or urethan/chloralose anesthesia. Neurons that responded to electrical stimulation of the cornea at the Vi/Vc transition region (n = 61) and at laminae I/II of the Vc/C1 transition region (n = 33) were classified regarding 1) corneal mechanical threshold; 2) cutaneous mechanoreceptive field, if present; 3) electrical input characteristics (A and/or C fiber); 4) response to thermal stimulation; 5) response to the small-fiber excitant, mustard oil (MO), applied to the cornea; 6) diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC); and 7) projection status to the contralateral parabrachial area (PBA). On the basis of cutaneous receptive field properties, neurons were classified as low-threshold mechanoreceptive (LTM), wide dynamic range (WDR), nociceptive specific (NS), or deep nociceptive (D). All neurons recorded at the Vc/C1 transition region were either WDR (n = 19) or NS (n = 14). In contrast, 54% of the Vi/Vc neurons had no cutaneous receptive field. Of those Vi/Vc neurons that had a cutaneous receptive field, 57% were LTM, 25% were WDR, and 18% were D. All Vc/ C1 neurons responded to noxious thermal and MO stimulation. Only 22 of 47 and 13 of 19 Vi/Vc corneal units responded to thermal or MO stimulation, respectively. At the Vc/C1 transition region, 12 of 17 neurons demonstrated DNIC, whereas at the Vi/Vc transition region, DNIC was present in only 4 of 26 neurons. Of 15 Vc/C1 corneal units, 12 could be antidromically activated from the contralateral PBA (average latency 6.29 ms, range 1.8-26 ms). None of 22 Vi/Vc corneal units tested could be antidromically activated from the PBA. These findings suggest that neurons in laminae I/II at the Vc/C1 transition and at the Vi/Vc transition process corneal input differently. Neurons in laminae I/II at the Vc/C1 transition process corneal afferent input consistent with that from other orofacial regions. Corneal-responsive neurons at the Vi/Vc transition region may be important in motor reflexes or in recruitment of descending antinociceptive controls.

An explanation for reflex blink hyperexcitability in Parkinson's disease. II. Nucleus raphe magnus

Hyperexcitable reflex blinks are a cardinal sign of Parkinson's disease. The first step in the circuit linking the basal ganglia and brainstem reflex blink circuits is the inhibitory nigrostriatal pathway (Basso et al., 1996). The current study reports the circuits linking the superior colliculus (SC) to trigeminal reflex blink circuits. Microstimulation of the deep layers of the SC suppresses subsequent reflex blinks at a latency of 5.4 msec. This microstimulation does not activate periaqueductal gray antinociceptive circuits. The brainstem structure linking SC to reflex blink circuits must suppress reflex blinks at a shorter latency than the SC and produce the same effect on reflex blink circuits as SC stimulation, and removal of the structure must block SC modulation of reflex blinks. Only the nucleus raphe magnus (NRM) meets these requirements. NRM microstimulation suppresses reflex blinks with a latency of 4.4 msec. Like SC stimulation, NRM microstimulation reduces the responsiveness of the spinal trigeminal nucleus. Finally, blocking the receptors for the NRM transmitter serotonin eliminates SC modulation of reflex blinks, and muscimol inactivation of the NRM transiently prevents SC modulation of reflex blinks. Thus, the circuit through which the basal ganglia modulates reflex blinking is (1) the substantia nigra pars reticulata inhibits SC neurons, (2) the SC excites tonically active NRM neurons, and (3) NRM neurons inhibit spinal trigeminal neurons involved in reflex blink circuits.

The trigeminally evoked blink reflex. II. Mechanisms of paired-stimulus suppression

The paired-stimulus paradigm, presentation of a pair of identical reflex-eliciting stimuli to the supraorbital nerve (SO) with an interstimulus interval of less than 2 s, evokes a response to the second, test, stimulus which is less than that elicited by the first, conditioning, stimulus. In this study, we investigated the site of this suppression and its pharmacology in the alert guinea pig. Both the early (R1) and the late (R2) component of the SO-evoked blink reflex exhibited suppression in the paired-stimulus paradigm. Initiation of suppression appeared to be specific to the afferent limb of the reflex rather than the result of motor activity generated by the conditioning stimulus. Neither acoustic conditioning stimuli nor air puffs that elicited blinks via another branch of the trigeminal nerve suppressed the test response. Extremely weak SO shocks, however, that did not directly elicit a reflex, caused suppression of the response to subsequent SO stimuli of normal intensity. Paired stimulus suppression of the R1 component appeared to involve activation of GABAB receptors within the spinal trigeminal nucleus. Both systemic injections and microinjections of baclofen into the spinal trigeminal nucleus enhanced R1 suppression, whereas identical injections of CGP35348, a GABAB antagonist, diminished R1 suppression. Furthermore, single-unit recordings in alert animals revealed that spinal trigeminal neurons exhibited suppression in the paired-stimulus paradigm that resembled that of the R1 component of the blink reflex. These findings showed that sensory gating underlies paired-stimulus suppression of the SO-evoked blink reflex and that activation of GABAB receptors plays an important role in this process.