The value of serum carcinoembryonic antigen in predicting recurrent disease following curative resection of colorectal cancer

Monitoring carcinoembryonic antigen in colorectal cancer: is it still useful?

The results of a study conducted to determine the usefulness of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) monitoring in the follow-up of patients with resected colorectal cancer are reported herein. The subjects of this study were 125 patients in whom CEA had been determined preoperatively and 239 patients in whom CEA had been monitored postoperatively. The results revealed increased preoperative CEA in only 24% of the subjects, and that this increment was correlated with subsequent more advanced tumor stage and a higher recurrence rate (P < 0.01). The postoperative CEA level exceeded the threshold in 71% of the patients affected by recurrence, 94.4% of whom developed liver metastases and 50%, nonhepatic recurrence. This marker showed elevated sensitivity for liver metastases (99%), whereas the sensitivity was lower for nonhepatic recurrence of the disease (94%). Thus, we concluded that CEA monitoring can be useful for preoperative colorectal tumor grading, even if its validity in the early diagnosis of recurrence is problematic, especially in terms of radical repeated surgery and survival.

Is carcino-embryonic antigen useful in the follow-up management of patients with colorectal liver metastases?

BACKGROUND

The role of carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) in monitoring early detection of recurrent or metastatic colorectal cancer, and its impact on resectability rate and patient survival remains controversial. Our objective was to determine any association between the preoperative level of CEA and prognosis, and the resectability and survival by method of diagnosis of colorectal hepatic metastases.

METHODS

We analyzed patients who underwent exploration for hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer over a 15-year period. The patient population consisted of those patients who had undergone primary colon or rectal resection and were followed up with serial CEA levels and of patients who were followed up with physical examination, liver function tests (LFTs) or computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis that led to the diagnosis of liver metastases. Also included in the study were patients who were diagnosed with liver metastases at the time of the primary colon or rectal resection and underwent planned hepatic resection at a later time.

RESULTS

Three hundred and one (301) patients who underwent a total of 345 planned hepatic resections for metastatic colorectal cancer between January 1978 and December 1993 were included in this analysis. The median preoperative CEA level was 24.8 ng/mL in the resected group, 53.0 ng/mL in the incomplete resection group, and 49.1 ng/mL in the nonresected group (P = 0.02). More of the patients who had a preoperative CEA < or =30 ng/mL were in the resected group, while those who had a preoperative CEA >30 ng/mL were likely to be in the nonresected group (P = 0.002). The median survival was 25 months for patients with a preoperative CEA level < or =30 ng/mL and 17 months for patients with a preoperative CEA >30 ng/mL (P = 0.0005). The resectability rate and the survival of patients by method of diagnosing liver metastases-rising CEA versus history and physical, elevated LFTs, CT scan versus diagnosis at the time of primary resection-was not significant (P = 0.06 and P = 0.19, respectively). Given the nonstandardized retrospective nature of the study cohort and relative small groups of patients, the power to detect small differences in survival by method of diagnosis is limited. In the complete resection group of patients with unilobar liver disease (5-year survival of 28.8%) there was no difference in survival between those patients who had normal preoperative CEA and those who had elevated preoperative CEA, and approximately 90% of them had an abnormal preoperative serum CEA level.

CONCLUSIONS

CEA is useful in the preoperative evaluation of patients with hepatic colorectal metastases for assessing prognosis and is complimentary to history and physical examination in the diagnosis of liver metastases. Patients with colorectal liver metastases and preoperative CEA < or =30 ng/mL are more likely to be resectable, and they have the longest survival.

Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen is related to tumour stage and long-term survival in colorectal cancer

Evidence as to the value of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in guiding treatment for patients with colorectal cancer is conflicting. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the value of preoperative CEA in predicting tumour factors of proven prognostic value and long-term survival in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. Preoperative serum CEA, tumour ploidy, stage and grade were ascertained in 277 patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. This cohort of patients were followed up for a minimum of 5 years, or until death, in a dedicated colorectal clinic. Patients with an elevated CEA had a 5 year survival of 39%. This increased to 57% if the CEA was normal (P=0.001). The proportion of patients with a raised CEA increased with a more advanced tumour stage (P < 0.000001) and a poorly differentiated tumour grade (P < 0.005). Once stage had been controlled for, CEA was not a predictor of survival. No relationship between tumour ploidy and CEA was found. In conclusion, a raised preoperative serum CEA is likely to be associated with advanced tumour stage and poor long-term survival, compared with patients with a normal value.

Follow-up of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The value of intensive follow-up for patients after resection of colorectal cancer remains controversial. This study reviews all randomized and prospective cohort studies to assess the value of aggressive follow-up.

METHODS

The literature was searched from the years 1972 to 1996 for studies reporting on the follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer. Randomized and comparative-cohort studies that included history, physical examination, and carcinoembrionic antigen values at least three times a year for at least two years were included in a meta-analysis. Single-cohort studies with intensive follow-up and traditional follow-up were also included in a two-group comparative analysis for each outcome indicator. Outcome indicators were 1) curative resection rates after recurrent cancer, 2) survival rates of curative re-resections, 3) length of survival after recurrence, and 4) cumulative five-year survival.

RESULTS

Two randomized and three comparative-cohort studies met these criteria and included 2,005 patients, which were evaluated in the meta-analysis. The cumulative five-year survival was 1.16 times higher in the intensively followed group (P = 0.003). Two and one-half times more curative re-resections were performed for recurrent cancer in those patients undergoing intensive follow-up (P = 0.0001). Those patients in the intensive follow-up group with a recurrence had a 3.62-times higher survival rate than the control (P = 0.0004). Fourteen single-cohort studies were also included in the comparative analysis of 6,641 patients. The findings from these aggregated studies support the results of the meta-analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our study concludes that intensive follow-up detects more recurrent cancers at a stage amenable to curative resection, resulting in an improvement in survival of recurrences and an increased overall five-year cumulative rate of survival.

Yearly colonoscopy, liver CT, and chest radiography do not influence 5-year survival of colorectal cancer patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Guidelines on the type and frequency of follow-up of patients after curative surgery for colorectal cancer are unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the survival benefit of a planned follow-up program.

METHODS

Three hundred twenty-five patients who underwent curative resection of colorectal cancer were prospectively randomized to either intensive or standard follow-up. After stratification according to Dukes' stage and site in the colon or rectum, patients were randomized to intensive follow-up of yearly colonoscopy, computerized tomography (CT) of the liver, and chest radiography and clinical review and simple screening vs. structured clinical review and simple screening tests only.

RESULTS

On completion of 5-year follow-up, there was no significant difference in survival between the two groups. Yearly colonoscopy failed to detect any asymptomatic local recurrences. Only one asymptomatic curable metachronous colon tumor was detected. Liver CT resulted in earlier detection of hepatic metastases but did not increase the number of curative hepatectomies. Only 1 patient had an asymptomatic CT-detected liver metastasis, and another had an asymptomatic chest radiography-detected lung metastasis. Both had curative resections.

CONCLUSIONS

Yearly colonoscopy, liver CT, and chest radiography will not improve survival from colorectal cancer when added to symptom and simple screening review.

A cost-effectiveness approach to the Norwegian follow-up programme in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Today, continued periodic follow-up of patients treated for colorectal cancer (CRC) seems often to be routine because of tradition, rather than its demonstrated value. Recently, the Norwegian Gastrointestinal Cancer Group (NGICG) has recommended a standard surveillance programme in this malignancy. In this protocol patients are suggested followed for four years with CEA monitoring, ultrasound of the liver, chest radiograph and colonoscopy at regular intervals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, the cost-effectiveness of this programme was addressed employing Norwegian cost data and data from the Cancer Registry of Norway. Clinical data from the existing English language literature was used in the analysis.

RESULTS

The basic cost of the NGICG recommended programme was 1,232 Pounds per patient. Including extended investigation due to suspected relapse in 45% of cases, the figure raised to 1,943 Pounds per patient. The cost per life year saved was indicated to 9,525 Pounds-16,192 Pounds. The corresponding cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) was indicated to 11,476 Pounds-19,508 Pounds.

CONCLUSION

We conclude the NGICG recommended follow-up programme in CRC cost-effective. Excluding CEA monitoring may improve the cost-effectiveness.

CEA as a prognostic index in colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

The carcinoembryonic antigen, CEA, is the tumor marker most used in colorectal patients, principally during follow up after radical surgery. High serum CEA level before surgery is often associated with worse prognosis, in some studies.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels (CEA) and the frequency of recurrence.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighty-three patients with colorectal cancer at Dukes stages A, B or C were evaluated retrospectively. The patients follow up was at least two years or to death. CEA was determined in serum by enzyme immunoassay (Sorin Biomedica), normal value 0.5ng/ml.

RESULTS

Disease recurrence was observed in 32 patients (38.5%), 13 Dukes B and 19 Dukes C. Seventy five per cent of the patients with CEA higher than 10ng/ml relapsed and 80% of the patients without recurrence had normal CEA. Disease recurrence in patients with preoperative elevated CEA occurred during the first year of follow up in 56% of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Although the tumor stage is today the most valuable prognostic variable in colorectal cancer, the preoperative CEA value can provide some additional information in the prognosis of the patient.

The need for a multidisciplinary approach in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: a critical review from a medical oncologist and surgeon

Over the last 10 years important advances have been made in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer, particularly with surgery either alone or in combination with radiotherapy. Furthermore, despite early scepticism, several chemotherapy studies have now reported significant clinical benefits with 5-FU-based regimens and promising results have also been reported with newer agents such as raltitrexed and irinotecan. Taken together these advances now enable a significant proportion of patients to undergo treatment which will improve their quality of life, prolong survival and even result in cure in certain cases. Patients with advanced colorectal cancer can only benefit from these important advances, however, if a truly multidisciplinary approach to patient care is adopted which requires integration of the roles of the surgeon, medical oncologist and radiotherapist.

The miniscule benefit of serial carcinoembryonic antigen monitoring after effective curative treatment for primary colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Serial carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels have been recommended to detect asymptomatic recurrent colorectal cancer and to facilitate curative additional therapy. This study was designed to investigate the outcome of additional treatment for recurrent cancer in patients undergoing primary colorectal cancer treatment in a specialty center and subsequent relapsing with an elevation in serum CEA.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients treated for their primary cancers at our institution whose followup included CEA monitoring and whose cancers subsequently recurred, were analyzed from a prospective database of almost 1,900 patients. CEA levels of > or = 5 ng/mL were considered elevated for purposes of treatment results. One hundred sixty-three patients were suitable for analysis. Median followup before and after recurrence was 14 months and 16 months, respectively.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were able to undergo complete resection of their recurrence, and 26 of these patients are without evidence of recurrence at last followup. Two-thirds of recurrences were associated with an elevation of CEA; this elevation at recurrence was associated with decreased survival (p < 0.05, Kaplan Meier). Of the 109 patients with an elevation of CEA at recurrence, complete re-resection was accomplished in 26 patients. Of these, half remain cancer free. Of those with a normal CEA at recurrence, complete re-resection was feasible in 24 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Only 17% of patients with recurrent colorectal cancer undergoing potentially curative reresection have an elevated CEA. If we use the denominator of our patient population using an estimated relapse rate of 25-50%, the overall likelihood of CEA-directed curative re-resection confirms early estimates of less than a 5% survival advantage.

IMMUNOBIOLOGICAL MONITORING OF VARIOUS GASTROINTESTINAL AND PRIMARY HEPATIC MALIGNANCIES

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and alpha fetoprotein levels (AFP) were assayed by enzyme-labelled immunoassay in 75 cases of gastrointestinal (GI) and primary hepatic malignancies. Mean CEA levels were found to be significantly higher (p<0.005) in metastatic non-operative group of GI malignancies (range 5.32 ng/mL to 175.2 ng/mL) as compared to early pre-operative cases (range 1.25 ng/mL to 33.2 ng/mL) and post-operative cases (range 1.41 ng/mL to 22.24 ng/mL). Variable levels of AFP were visualised in 12 cases of primary hepatic malignancies with eight cases having values less than 100 ng/mL. When both CEA and AFP were assayed simultaneously, the markers were helpful in differentiating cases of primary hepatic malignancies with low levels of CEA from 3 cases of secondaries in the liver where CEA levels were found to be highly raised (80.4 ng/mL to 146.4 ng/mL). To evaluate the variation of CEA and AFP levels in different patients having same stage of the disease, immunological monitoring for the functions of T and B cells was carried out by estimation of cytokine, i.e. interleukin-1 alpha (IL-1a), interleukin-2R (II-2R) and various immunoglobulins. IL-1a and 1L-2R levels were significantly higher (p<0.05) in the groups of patients having higher CEA and AFP. This indicates an important T cell (TH1 and TH2) function in the tumour antigen production.

N-terminal peptide of type III procollagen: a possible predictor of colorectal carcinoma recurrence

BACKGROUND

The first step of colorectal carcinoma spread depends on the ability of the tumor cells to degrade and invade the extracellular matrix (ECM). The objectives of the current study were to evaluate the serum pattern of laminin, C-terminal peptide of Type I (PIP), and N-terminal peptide of Type III (PIIIP) procollagens, markers of ECM synthesis, in the follow-up of patients after resection for colorectal carcinoma and to evaluate their role in predicting local recurrence or metastases.

METHODS

A total of 32 patients who had undergone resection for colorectal carcinoma were followed for a median period of 24 months (range, 6-36 months). Every 3 months, laminin, PIP, and PIIIP were measured in the sera together with the tumor markers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CA 19-9, and tissue plasminogen activator (TPA). Twenty-one patients (Group 1) had no signs of recurrence, whereas the remaining 11 (Group 2) developed hepatic (n = 7) or pulmonary (n = 4) metastases.

RESULTS

No variations were observed in either group for laminin, CEA, CA 19-9, or TPA, whereas significant increases in PIP and PIIIP were observed in both groups 3 months after surgery. The increase in PIP and PIIIP at the 3-month follow-up was significantly greater in Group 1 than in Group 2. The difference between values at 3 months and basal values enabled a discrimination between Group 1 and Group 2, with a sensitivity of 36% and 91% and a specificity of 71% and 71% for PIP and PIIIP, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors believe PIIIP is useful as an early prognostic indicator of recurrence in the follow-up of patients who have undergone radical resection for colorectal carcinoma.

Value of carcinoembryonic antigen monitoring in curative surgery for recurrent colorectal carcinoma

PURPOSE

This study is designed to review a carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-driven postoperative protocol designed to identify patients suitable for curative reresection when recurrent colorectal cancer is identified.

METHODS

A total of 285 patients who were operated on for colon or rectal carcinoma between 1981 and 1985 were evaluated (with CEA levels) every two months for the first two years, every three months for the third year, every six months for years 4 and 5, and annually thereafter. CEA levels above 5 microg were considered abnormal and were evaluated with diagnostic imaging and/or endoscopy.

RESULTS

Follow-up was available for 280 patients (98.2 percent). Distribution of patients by Astler-Coller was: A, 14 percent; B1, 20 percent; B2, 39 percent; C1, 5 percent; C2, 21 percent. There were 62 of 280 patients (22 percent) who developed elevated CEA levels, with 44 patients who demonstrated clinical or radiographic evidence of recurrence. Eleven patients were selected for surgery with curative intent (4 hepatic resections, 1 pulmonary wedge resection, 2 abdominoperineal resections, 2 segmental bowel resections, and 2 cranial metastasectomies). Three of 11 patients (27 percent) benefited and have disease-free survivals greater than 60 months. Of the 223 patients without elevated CEA, 22 (9.9 percent) had recurrent cancer without any survivors. Overall, 3 of 285 patients (1.1 percent) were cured as a result of CEA follow-up.

CONCLUSION

CEA-driven surgery is useful in selected patients and can produce long-term survivors.

Routine compared with nonscheduled follow-up of patients with "curative" surgery for colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The main rationale for follow-up of colorectal cancer patients resected for "cure" is that early detection and treatment of recurrence and metachronous disease should result in improved survival. Our purpose was to assess in a prospective fashion the impact on survival of a follow-up program versus that of undergoing nonscheduled visits.

METHODS

Within the 14-year period from 1975 through 1988, a prospective study was carried out on 800 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma radically resected with no evidence of synchronous cancers of the colon and rectum or in other organs, of whom 322 patients were to attend a 5-year follow-up, and 478 patients were free to make nonscheduled visits on account of symptoms.

RESULTS

Asymptomatic recurrence was found at follow-up in 92 (28%) of 322 patients, whereas 175 (36%) of 478 patients had a symptomatic recurrence detected at a nonscheduled visit. Diagnosis of resectable recurrence was established within a median time of 21.5 months. Surgical resection of recurrence was performed in 30 (32%) of 92 and in 13 (7%) of 175 patients (32 vs. 7%; p < 0.001). Resection was curative in 13 (14%) of 92 and in two (1%) of 175. Five-year survival of resected recurrence was 10% in 30 of 92 patients and 0.8% in 13 of 175 (10 vs. 0.8%; p < 0.01). Two patients are alive with no evidence of disease or two (2%) of 92. Metachronous colorectal lesions were treated for cure in 63 (19.5%) of 322 patients. The effectiveness of scheduled follow-up was 4% (13 of 322 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

These results underline the rationale for a follow-up program in early detection and surgical treatment of recurrent disease in patients operated on for colorectal cancer.

Serum tumor markers in colorectal cancer staging, grading, and follow-up

Early diagnosis of colorectal cancer, a frequent neoplasia in industrialized countries, permits curative surgery. In this study we assessed the clinical role of serum tumor markers determination in diagnosing, staging, and grading colorectal cancer; the role of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CA 19-9, tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) and CA 72-4 in colorectal cancer follow-up was also assessed. In 114 patients with colorectal cancer, the oncofetal antigen CEA was compared with the membrane-associated glycoproteins CA 19-9, CA 242, and CA 72-4 and with the cytokeratins TPA, tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS) and tissue polypeptide monoclonal antigen (TPM). Overall, the most sensitive indices were TPA and TPS (67% and 70%, respectively). Tumor stage influenced the levels of CEA, CA 19-9, and TPA, but not those of TPS, while tumor grade influenced CEA and TPS, but not CA 72-4, TPA, and TPM. TPA was the most sensitive index in identifying early or well-differentiated colorectal cancers. The sensitivity was enhanced when this marker was determined in combination with CEA, in diagnosing both advanced and early colorectal tumors. Seventy-seven patients were followed up after therapy for at least 18 months. CEA was the most sensitive index of recurrence (58%); however, this sensitivity is too low to consider tumor markers useful in colorectal cancer follow-up.