Long-term fracture risk following renal transplantation: a population-based study

Bisphosphonates and bone fractures in long-term kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

There is little information on the role of bisphosphonates and bone mineral density (BMD) measurements for the follow-up and management of bone loss and fractures in long-term kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

To address this question, we retrospectively studied 554 patients who had two BMD measurements after the first year posttransplant and compared outcomes in patients treated, or not with bisphosphonates between the two BMD assessments. Kaplan-Meier survival and stepwise Cox regression analyses were performed to examine fracture-free survival rates and the risk-factors associated with fractures.

RESULTS

The average time (+/-SE) between transplant and the first BMD was 1.2+/-0.05 years. The time interval between the two BMD measurements was 2.5+/-0.05 years. There were 239 and 315 patients in the no-bisphosphonate and bisphosphonate groups, respectively. Treatment was associated with significant preservation of bone loss at the femoral neck (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.21-2.06, P=0.0007). However, there was no association between bone loss at the femoral neck and fractures regardless of bisphosphonate therapy. Stepwise Cox regression analyses showed that type-1 diabetes, baseline femoral neck T-score, interleukin-2 receptor blockade, and proteinuria (HR 2.02, 0.69, 0.4, 1.23 respectively, P<0.01), but not bisphosphonates, were associated with the risk of fracture.

CONCLUSIONS

Bisphosphonates may prevent bone loss in long-term kidney transplant recipients. However, these data suggest a limited role for the initiation of therapy after the first posttransplant year to prevent fractures.

Management of metabolic bone disease in kidney transplant recipients

Bone disease after kidney transplantation has a complex pathophysiology and heterogeneous histology. Pre-existing renal osteodystrophy may not resolve completely, but continue or evolve into a different osteodystrophy. Rapid bone loss immediately after transplant can persist, at a lower rate, for years to come. These greatly increase the risk of bone fracture and vertebral collapse. Hypovitaminosis D, hyperparathyroidism and hyperaluminemia may resolve after kidney transplant, but many patients have other risk factors of bone loss, such as steroids usage, hypogonadism, persistent hyperparathyroidism, poor allograft function, aging, and chronic diseases. Clinical management requires a comprehensive approach to address the underlying and ongoing disease processes. Successful prevention of bone loss has been shown with vitamin D analogues, bisphosphonates and calcitonin. Novel approaches to restore the normal bone remodeling and improve the bone quality may be needed in order to effectively decrease bone fractures in kidney transplant recipients.

FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK

A fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) is developed based on the use of clinical risk factors with or without bone mineral density tests applied to the UK.

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to apply an assessment tool for the prediction of fracture in men and women with the use of clinical risk factors (CRFs) for fracture with and without the use of femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD). The clinical risk factors, identified from previous meta-analyses, comprised body mass index (BMI, as a continuous variable), a prior history of fracture, a parental history of hip fracture, use of oral glucocorticoids, rheumatoid arthritis and other secondary causes of osteoporosis, current smoking, and alcohol intake 3 or more units daily.

METHODS

Four models were constructed to compute fracture probabilities based on the epidemiology of fracture in the UK. The models comprised the ten-year probability of hip fracture, with and without femoral neck BMD, and the ten-year probability of a major osteoporotic fracture, with and without BMD. For each model fracture and death hazards were computed as continuous functions.

RESULTS

Each clinical risk factor contributed to fracture probability. In the absence of BMD, hip fracture probability in women with a fixed BMI (25 kg/m(2)) ranged from 0.2% at the age of 50 years for women without CRF's to 22% at the age of 80 years with a parental history of hip fracture (approximately 100-fold range). In men, the probabilities were lower, as was the range (0.1 to 11% in the examples above). For a major osteoporotic fracture the probabilities ranged from 3.5% to 31% in women, and from 2.8% to 15% in men in the example above. The presence of one or more risk factors increased probabilities in an incremental manner. The differences in probabilities between men and women were comparable at any given T-score and age, except in the elderly where probabilities were higher in women than in men due to the higher mortality of the latter.

CONCLUSION

The models provide a framework which enhances the assessment of fracture risk in both men and women by the integration of clinical risk factors alone and/or in combination with BMD.

Does diabetes increase the risk for fractures after solid organ transplantation? A nested case-control study

To assess the risk of fractures after a solid organ transplantation among diabetic versus nondiabetic patients, we conducted a nested case-control study. Pretransplant diabetes was associated with a 2-fold increase in post-transplant fractures.

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes has been associated with osteoporosis in the general population. However, among patients receiving solid organ transplantation, the association between pretransplant diabetes and post-transplant fractures is not clear, although both diabetes and fractures are prevalent among this patient population. We aimed to determine whether pretransplant diabetes increases the risk of fractures among patients receiving solid organ transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a nested case-control study in a cohort of subjects 18 years and older, enrolled in the Quebec Drug Insurance Plan, who received a first solid organ transplantation between January 1986 and December 2005. Cases had sustained a fracture between the date of discharge from the hospitalization for solid organ transplantation and the end of the study period. All remaining patients were eligible controls. The fracture date was the case index date. Cases were matched to up to four controls on the type of organ transplanted and the date of transplantation. The index date of a control patient was that of his/her matched case. Crude and adjusted ORs were obtained with univariate and multivariate conditional logistic regression models.

RESULTS

The study included 238 cases and 873 controls. Pretransplant diabetes was present in 30% of the cases and 22% of the controls (crude OR: 2.16; 95% CI: 1.7-2.8). After adjusting for age, sex, previous fractures, past hyperthyroidism, hospitalization duration, use of narcotics, benzodiazepines, antidepressants, loop diuretics, thiazide diuretics, glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants, estrogens, bisphosphonates, calcium, vitamin D, and calcitonin, pretransplantation diabetes remained a significant risk factor for fractures (adjusted OR: 1.94; 95% CI: 1.5-2.6). Use of narcotics (OR: 3.0; 95% CI: 2.0-4.4) and antidepressants (OR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.2-3.1) in the month preceding the index date and use of loop diuretics in the year preceding the index date (OR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.1-1.9) were also associated with increased risks of fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretransplant diabetes seemed to significantly increase post-transplant fractures among adults receiving solid organ transplantation. Pretransplant fracture prophylaxis should be considered in these patients.

Effects of bisphosphonate treatment on bone repair under immunosuppression using cyclosporine A in adult rats

The effect of cyclosporine A on bone turnover remains unclear. Using adult rats with vascularized bone transplantation, we show that long-term cyclosporine A administration increases bone turnover and zoledronic acid treatment enhances the reconstruction of cyclosporine A-administered skeleton. Bisphosphonates might be efficacious in human bone repair under immunosuppression using cyclosporine A.

INTRODUCTION

Bisphosphonate treatment effectively prevents bone loss after transplantation. However, recent evidence from gain- and loss-of-function experiments has indicated that calcineurin inhibitors, such as cyclosporine A (CsA), reduce bone turnover, and severely suppressed bone turnover might delay the union of human fractured bone. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of bisphosphonate treatment on the repair of CsA-administered skeleton.

METHODS

After skeletal reconstruction by vascularized tibial grafting, adult recipient rats were treated with intramuscular CsA (10 mg/kg/day) and low-dose (0.2 microg/kg/week) or high-dose (2 microg/kg/week) subcutaneous zoledronic acid alone or in combination for 8 weeks. Biochemical parameters were measured in blood and urine. The reconstructed skeleton was analyzed using soft X-ray, histology, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, and three-point bending test.

RESULTS

CsA induced mild renal dysfunction, hyperparathyroidism and high bone turnover. High-dose zoledronic acid delayed cortical bone union at the distal host-graft junction, but its combination with CsA did not cause such a delay. High-dose zoledronic acid prevented CsA-induced bone loss and bone fragility in the reconstructed skeleton.

CONCLUSION

In this rat model, long-term CsA administration increases bone turnover, at least partly, through hyperparathyroidism and high-dose zoledronic acid treatment does not impair the union of CsA-administered bone.

Prevalence of Osteoporosis, Osteopenia, and Vertebral Fractures in Long-Term Renal Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Osteopenia and osteoporosis are frequent complications early after transplantation. Their long-term prevalences and associations with the risk of fractures are not well known. The objective of the present work was to determine the incidence of osteopenia and osteoporosis versus vertebral fractures in renal transplant recipients with stable graft function and with a follow-up of at least 10 years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty renal transplant recipients, 24 men and 16 women, were included in the study. The mean age was 41.8 years and the follow-up was 130 +/- 14 months. Initial immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporine with or without an antiproliferative agent. Measurements of bone mass density (BMD) were performed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). The assessment of vertebral fracture using conventional radiography was evaluated by semiquantitative criteria.

RESULTS

Eleven patients (27.5%) displayed lumbar spine osteoporosis (T-score < -2.5); 21 (52.5%), osteopenia (T-score > -2.5 and < -1) and 8 (20.0%), normal BMD. However, BMD was better preserved at the femoral neck: 14 patients (35.0%) had normal BMD; 20 (50.0%) osteopenia, and 6 (15.0%), osteoporosis. When analyzed together, patients with osteoporosis or osteopenia showed worse graft function at 1 and 8 years compared with normal BMD patients (1.75 +/- 0.634 vs 1.32 +/- 0.33 mg/dL at 1 year; P < .014) and (1.7 +/- 0.4 vs 1.2 +/- 0.2 mg/dL at 5 years; P < .01) and a greater number were prescribed vitamin D (50% vs 23%). Mild vertebral fractures were observed in 60.0% patients with osteoporosis; 70% with osteopenia; and 43% with normal lumbar BMD. Peripheral fractures were more common in patients with osteoporosis (P = .053).

CONCLUSIONS

Osteoporosis and osteopenia are common among long-term renal transplant recipients are associated with poorer graft function. Lumbar spine BMD osteoporosis is associated with peripheral fractures. However, mild vertebral deformities are not associated with the presence of osteopenia or osteoporosis.

Interventions for preventing bone disease in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic kidney disease have significant abnormalities of bone remodeling and mineral homeostasis and are at increased risk of fracture. The fracture risk for a kidney transplant recipient is four times that of the general population and higher than for a patient on dialysis. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) report the use of bisphosphonates, vitamin D sterols, calcitonin, and hormone replacement therapy to treat bone disease following transplantation.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the use of interventions for treating bone disease following kidney transplantation.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL in The Cochrane Library), Cochrane Renal Group's specialised register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, reference lists, and conference proceedings abstracts without language restriction. Date of last search: May 2006

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs and quasi-RCTs comparing different treatments for kidney transplant recipients of any age were selected. We excluded all other transplant recipients, including kidney-pancreas transplant recipients.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model and the results expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous variables and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-four trials (1,299 patients) were included. No individual intervention (bisphosphonates, vitamin D sterol or calcitonin) was associated with a reduction in fracture risk compared with placebo. Combining results for all active interventions against placebo demonstrated any treatment of bone disease was associated with a reduction in the RR of fracture (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.99). Bisphosphonates (any route), vitamin D sterol, and calcitonin all had a beneficial effect on the bone mineral density at the lumbar spine. Bisphosphonates and vitamin D sterol also had a beneficial effect on the bone mineral density at the femoral neck. Bisphosphonates had greater efficacy for preventing bone mineral density loss when compared head-to-head with vitamin D sterols. Few or no data were available for combined hormone replacement, testosterone, selective oestrogen receptor modulators, fluoride or anabolic steroids. Other outcomes including all-cause mortality and drug-related toxicity were reported infrequently.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with a bisphosphonate, vitamin D sterol or calcitonin after kidney transplantation may protect against immunosuppression-induced reductions in bone mineral density and prevent fracture. Adequately powered trials are required to determine whether bisphosphonates are better than vitamin D sterols for fracture prevention in this population. The optimal route, timing, and duration of administration of these interventions remains unknown.

Elevated calcium phosphate product after renal transplantation is a risk factor for graft failure

BACKGROUND

Abnormal mineral metabolism is not uncommon after renal transplant (TXP). In dialysis patients, elevated serum phosphorous (P), calcium (Ca), CaP product, and parathyroid hormone (PTH) are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The effect of these abnormalities on recipient and graft survival after renal transplantation is unknown.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 422 kidney-only transplants performed between June 1996 and June 2003. Cases with graft or recipient survival less than three months, pre-TXP parathyroidectomy (PTX), cinacalcet therapy and incomplete records were excluded, leaving 303 cases for analysis using Cox models that included post-TXP PTX, levels of albumin-adjusted Ca(Ca(adj)), P, Ca(adj)P product and PTH.

RESULTS

There was an 11-25% prevalence of abnormal serum Ca(adj), P or Ca(adj)P product within the first year post-TXP. At least 24% of recipients not undergoing PTX with an equation estimated GFR of 40-60 mL/min had PTH levels >130 pg/mL at one yr post-TXP. This is above levels recommended by the U.S National Kidney Foundation kidney disease quality initiative for patients with stages I-IV chronic kidney disease. Adjusted Ca > 10.5 mg/dL at three months post-TXP was an independent risk for recipient death (OR 3.0; 95% CI: 1.2-7.4). A Ca(adj)P product >35 mg(2)/dL(2) at six months (OR 4.0; 95% CI: 1.2-13.1), and Ca >10.5 mg/dL at 12 months post-TXP (OR 4.0; 95% CI: 1.2-14) were independent risks for death-censored graft loss. Twenty-two recipients underwent PTX for severe hyperparathyroidism.

CONCLUSION

Abnormalities of mineral metabolism are common early after renal TXP. An elevated serum Ca(adj) at three months post-TXP increases the risk for recipient death, while an elevated Ca(adj)P and Ca(adj) later in the first post-TXP year increases the risk of long-term death-censored graft loss.

Hypophosphatemia: clinical consequences and management

Current evidence regarding the clinical consequences of hypophosphatemia is not straightforward. Given the potentially different implications of hypophosphatemia among various patient groups, this commentary touches on patients with low serum phosphate after acute hospitalization, those with chronic ambulatory hypophosphatemia, and those with hypophosphatemia in the setting of advanced renal disease. Finally, this commentary examines the evidence regarding how best to replete phosphorous in the hypophosphatemic patient.

Bone disease after renal transplantation

It has been well established that a rapid decrease in bone mineral density (BMD) occurs in the first 6 to 12 mo after a successful renal transplantation and persists, albeit at a lower rate, for many years. This rapid BMD loss significantly increases the fracture risk of these patients to levels that are even higher than those of patients who have chronic kidney disease stage 5 and are on dialysis. The presence of low BMD in renal transplant patients as a predictor of risk fracture is controversial. Indeed, as has been suggested also for patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis, there is not a compelling correlation between the decline in BMD and skeletal fractures. However, bone disease after renal transplantation probably represents a unique bone disorder that must encompass underlying renal osteodystrophy. In fact, this syndrome results from multiple factors that include pretransplantation bone status, use of glucocorticoids and other immunosuppressive drugs, hypophosphatemia, and alterations of the calcium-vitamin D axis. Recent studies have demonstrated decreased osteoblast number, reduced bone formation rate, delayed mineralization, and increased osteoblast and osteocyte apoptosis. Bisphosphonates and vitamin D metabolites may be valuable in preventing or diminishing early bone loss. However, clinicians should be careful with the use of bisphosphonates and oversuppression of bone, especially in patients with low bone turnover. New prospective, controlled trials are required to confirm the real efficacy of these drugs, particularly in long-term renal transplant patients.

Post-renal transplantation hypophosphatemia: a review and novel insights

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review intends to elucidate the pathophysiologic mechanism of renal phosphorus loss in the post-renal transplantation population. This review will provide new insight in to the pathophysiologic mechanism(s) responsible for the development of this phenomenon and will also explore the pathogenetic role of persistent phosphorus wasting in the development of post-renal transplantation osteodystrophy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recently, the phosphaturic hormone, fibroblast growth factor-23, has been ascertain to be increased in the sera of patients with chronic kidney and end-stage renal disease. There is new evidence that a non-PTH humoral factor is persistently present in post-renal transplantation patients that is likely responsible for the observed persistent renal phosphorus loss. We offer that fibroblast growth factor-23 (and/or other phosphatonins) is the culprit factor responsible for the phenomenon of persistent hypophosphatemia in post-renal transplantation patients. Moreover, we believe that the phenomenon of persistent renal phosphorus wasting is an important but overlooked cause of osteodystrophy and increased fracture risk in this patient population.

SUMMARY

The pathophysiology of post-renal transplantation phosphorus wasting is complex and to date is still not fully recognized. Further studies of the regulatory mechanism of fibroblast growth factor-23 and its metabolism may offer additional insights into phosphorus homeostasis and its clinical application in the post-renal transplantation population.

Renal osteodystrophy

The incidence of chronic renal disease is increasing, and the pattern of renal osteodystrophy seems to be shifting from the classic hyperparathyroid presentation to one of low bone turnover. Patients with persistent disease also live longer than previously and are more physically active. Thus, patients may experience trauma as a direct result of increased physical activity in a setting of weakened pathologic bone. Patient quality of life is primarily limited by musculoskeletal problems, such as bone pain, muscle weakness, growth retardation, and skeletal deformity. Chronic renal disease also increases the risk of comorbidity, such as infection, bleeding, and anesthesia-related problems. Current treatment strategies include dietary changes, plate-and-screw fixation, and open reduction and internal fixation.

Immunosuppression and immune monitoring after renal transplantation

Monitoring of immunosuppression therapy in renal transplant recipients is essential for good patient and graft survival. Monitoring includes frequent laboratory assays of serum immunosuppression levels, patient visits to assess and treat side effects, and vigilance for medication interactions. We review the various immunosuppression medications commonly used in renal transplantation, including usual dosing and side effects. Monitoring assays are discussed, as well as the frequency of monitoring and patient visits. Finally, we discuss several common clinical scenarios that often require adjustment of immunosuppression medications or regimens.

Cinacalcet HCl: a novel therapeutic for hyperparathyroidism

Hyperparathyroidism (HPT) is a significant clinical concern for patients with a variety of diseases, notably the secondary HPT associated with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis. Secondary HPT is associated with elevated para-thyroid hormone (PTH) levels, decreased levels of 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D, and disordered mineral levels (usually high calcium and phosphorus). If not controlled, secondary HPT can result in bone disease, vascular calcification, and ultimately, patient mortality. Established, conventional therapies, such as 1,25dihydroxyvitamin D analogues (vitamin D analogues) and phosphate binders, have proven to be inadequate in enabling patients to meet the National Kidney Foundation's-Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF-K/DOQI) treatment goals for PTH, calcium and phosphorus levels. A novel therapeutic, cinacalcet HCl (formerly AMG 073; Sensipar in the US and Mimpara in Europe; Amgen, Inc.), binds directly to the calcium-sensing receptor (CaR) on the cells of the parathyroid gland, increasing the receptor's sensitivity to calcium and reducing PTH, serum calcium and phosphorus levels. Treatment with cinacalcet in clinical trials has safely and effectively improved achievement of the NKF-K/DOQI goals. Cinacalcet has also reduced serum calcium levels in patients with primary HPT, including parathyroid carcinoma, in the clinical trial setting. Evidence suggesting the utility of cinacalcet in these diseases and the potential for additional therapeutic applications will be discussed.

Incidence and predictors of fractures in children after solid organ transplantation: a 5-year prospective, population-based study

In this population-based prospective follow-up study, children undergoing solid organ transplantation had a highly elevated risk for fractures: The incidence of all fractures was 6-fold higher (92 versus 14 fractures/1000 persons/year; p < 0.001) and vertebral fractures was 160-fold higher (57 versus 0.35 fractures/1000 persons/year; p < 0.001) in the study group compared with the control population. Thus, screening of vertebral fractures at regular intervals is recommended, and preventive strategies should be studied.

INTRODUCTION

The incidence and predictors of fractures after solid organ transplantation are not well documented in the pediatric age group.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 196 children, which is 93% of patients surviving kidney, liver, and heart transplantation in our country, participated in a retrospective chart review at enrollment followed by a 5-year prospective follow-up study between January 1999 and December 2004. Hospital and medical records were reviewed. All children underwent clinical examinations and answered questionnaires concerning fracture history at the beginning and at the end of the prospective follow-up. Radiographs of the thoracic and lumbar spine were obtained. The fracture incidence was compared with data obtained from public health registries.

RESULTS

Seventy-five (38%) of the transplant patients suffered from a total of 166 fractures after organ transplantation. The incidence of all fractures was 6-fold higher (92 versus 14 fractures/1000 persons/year; p < 0.001) and vertebral fractures was 160-fold higher (57 versus 0.35 fractures/1000 persons/year; p < 0.001) in the study group compared with the control population. The age- and sex-adjusted hazard ratios (95% CI) were 61.3 (40.7-92.4) for vertebral, 17.9 (8.96-35.8) for symptomatic vertebral, 0.99 (0.65-1.50) for nonvertebral, and 2.90 (2.25-3.73) for all fractures in the patients compared with the control population. In a multivariate analysis, older age (hazard ratio [95% CI]; 2.02 [1.07-3.83]), male sex (2.15 [1.22-3.81]), liver transplantation (1.78 [1.01-3.14]), and fractures before transplantation (2.02 [0.92-4.47]) were the most significant independent risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Children undergoing solid organ transplantation have a highly elevated risk for fractures. Screening of vertebral fractures at regular intervals is recommended, and preventive strategies should be studied.

Reduction in normalized bone elasticity following long-term bisphosphonate treatment as measured by ultrasound critical angle reflectometry

Using an improved version of ultrasound critical angle reflectometry, the bone quality of cortical and trabecular bone was assessed in vivo by measuring elastic moduli (normalized for bone density) at both principal axes, referred to as the minimum and maximum normalized elasticities. The measurements were made in 30 normal premenopausal women, 30 normal postmenopausal women, 22 untreated postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, 74 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis or osteopenia on bisphosphonate treatment, and 32 patients with renal transplantation (16 women and 16 men) taking steroids. Cortical elasticity was higher than trabecular elasticity; both declined slightly and non-significantly with age in normal women. Among untreated postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, cortical maximum normalized elasticity (E(cmax)) remained within 95% prediction intervals of normal women. Among patients on bisphosphonate, E(cmax) was low in the majority of patients. E(cmax) was significantly more depressed among those taking the drug > or =3 years than <3 years (22.1% below normal premenopausal women versus 17.2%, P =0.001), and among those with incident non-spinal fractures than without (75.9 vs. 81.5%, P =0.008). E(cmax) was independent of bone mineral density at the calcaneus. Most patients with renal transplantation had low E(cmax), with a mean 20.8% below the normal premenopausal mean. Qualitatively similar findings were found with cortical minimum elasticity and with trabecular minimum and maximum elasticities. Thus, the material bone quality of cortical and trabecular bone may be impaired following bisphosphonate treatment, as in renal transplantation on steroids.

Diagnosis and epidemiology of osteoporosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Osteoporosis remains a major public health problem through its association with fragility fractures. Recent data suggest that the annual cost in Europe is 13 billion euros, mainly accounted for by hospitalisation after fracture. Understanding the epidemiology of osteoporosis is an essential step in developing strategies to reduce the burden of osteoporotic fracture in the population.

RECENT FINDINGS

This article will review recent advances surrounding the epidemiology of osteoporosis, the burden of fracture in children and adults in this country and abroad, morbidity associated with such fractures, associations of disease and medication with fragility fracture, and advances in diagnostic techniques and identification of at-risk groups.

SUMMARY

The papers studied highlight the wealth of high-quality research in this field, and they help in the visualisation of strategies to identify individuals at high risk of fragility fracture and to quantify fracture risk by measurement of bone density, bone quality, and risk factor algorithms.

Osteoporose após transplante de órgãos sólidos

A osteoporose é uma complicação comum após os transplantes de rim, coração, fígado e pulmão. Os esquemas imunossupressores para evitar a rejeição do órgão enxertado após o transplante freqüentemente incluem glicocorticóides, ciclosporina A e tacrolimus, os quais possuem efeitos danosos sobre a homeostase mineral óssea, impostos a um esqueleto já comprometido. Outros fatores que provavelmente contribuem para a patogênese da osteoporose pós-transplante são deficiência de vitamina D, hiperparatireoidismo secundário e hipogonadismo. Medidas para avaliação da saúde óssea antes do transplante deveriam ser realizadas: densitometria mineral óssea, radiografia da coluna, avaliação do nível de vitamina D e dos hormônios gonadais. Todos os pacientes transplantados deveriam ser submetidos à profilaxia da perda óssea. Estudos clínicos sugerem que os bisfosfonatos são os agentes mais promissores para a prevenção e o tratamento da osteoporose pós-transplante.

Interventions for preventing bone disease in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic kidney disease have significant abnormalities of bone remodelling and calcium homeostasis and are at increased risk of fracture. The fracture risk for a kidney transplant recipient is four times that of the general population and higher than that for a patient on dialysis. Trials reporting the use of bisphosphonates, vitamin D analogues, calcitonin, and hormone replacement therapy to treat bone disease following engraftment exist.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the use of interventions for the treatment of bone disease following kidney transplantation.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library - Issue 3 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to August 2004), EMBASE (1980- August 2004) and reference lists were searched without language restriction.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials of treatment of bone disease following kidney transplantation were included. Trials of recipients of any transplant other than a kidney transplant including trials of kidney-pancreas transplants were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors assessed independently trial quality and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model and the results expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous variables. For continuous variables the weighted mean difference (WMD) and its 95% CI was used.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-three eligible trials (1,209 patients) were identified. Seven trials compared more than two interventions. Nineteen trials compared active treatment with placebo, five vitamin D analogue and calcium, six vitamin D analogue alone, twelve bisphosphonates, and four nasal calcitonin. Eight trials compared two active treatments, one 17-beta oestradiol and medroxyprogesterone versus vitamin D analogue, five bisphosphonate versus vitamin D analogue, two vitamin D analogue and calcium versus calcium and one bisphosphonate versus calcitonin. Methodological quality was suboptimal. There were no significant differences between any treatment group for risk of fracture. Bisphosphonate, administered by any route, vitamin D analogue and calcitonin all had a beneficial effect on the bone mineral density at the lumbar spine. Bisphosphonates and vitamin D analogue had a beneficial effect on the bone mineral density at the femoral neck. Few or no data were available for combined hormone replacement, testosterone, selective oestrogen receptor modulators, fluoride or anabolic steroids. All-cause mortality and drug-related toxicity were reported infrequently and there was no statistical difference between treatment groups.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No benefit from any intervention known to reduce risk of fracture from bone disease could be demonstrated to reduce fracture incidence in kidney transplant recipients.

Interventions for preventing bone disease in kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Before renal transplantation complex abnormalities of bone metabolism exist and lead to increased risk for fracture after transplantation. This study was conducted to assess the evidence available to guide targeted treatment to reduce bone disease in transplant recipients.

METHODS

The Cochrane CENTRAL Registry, MEDLINE, and EMBASE were searched for randomized trials of interventions for bone disease after renal transplantation. Data were extracted on fracture, bone mineral density (BMD) by means of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, acute graft rejection, and adverse events. Analysis was performed with a random-effects model, and all results are expressed as relative risk with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Twenty-three eligible trials (1,209 patients) were identified. No trial found a reduction in risk for fracture. Bisphosphonates (7 trials; 268 patients; weighted mean difference [WMD], 7.66; 95% CI, 4.82 to 10.50), vitamin D analogues (2 trials; 51 patients; WMD, 6.13; 95% CI, 4.97 to 7.29), and calcitonin (1 trial; 31 patients; WMD, 5.00; 95% CI, 0.88 to 9.12) favorably affected the percentage of change in BMD at the lumbar spine compared with no treatment. Bisphosphonates (4 trials; 149 patients; WMD, 7.18; 95% CI, 6.22 to 8.13) and vitamin D analogues (2 trials; 51 patients; WMD, 3.73; 95% CI, 2.71 to 4.75), but not calcitonin (1 trial; 31 patients; WMD, -0.30; 95% CI, -5.00 to 4.40), had a favorable effect on BMD measured at the femoral neck compared with no treatment. The incidence of reported toxicity was low.

CONCLUSION

The trials were inadequately powered to show a reduction in risk for fracture. Bisphosphonates and vitamin D have a beneficial effect on BMD at the lumbar spine and femoral neck. With increasing survival after renal transplantation, this study stresses the importance of randomized controlled trial evidence of interventions of bone disease after renal transplantation.

Pancreas transplantation: indications and consequences

Pancreas transplantation continues to evolve as a strategy in the management of diabetes mellitus. The first combined pancreas-kidney transplant was reported in 1967, but pancreas transplant now represents a number of procedures, each with different indications, risks, benefits, and outcomes. This review will summarize these procedures, including their risks and outcomes in comparison to kidney transplantation alone, and how or if they affect the consequences of diabetes: hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, and microvascular and macrovascular complications. In addition, the new risks introduced by immunosuppression will be reviewed, including infections, cancer, osteoporosis, reproductive function, and the impact of immunosuppression medications on blood pressure, lipids, and glucose tolerance. It is imperative that an endocrinologist remain involved in the care of the pancreas transplant recipient, even when glucose is normal, because of the myriad of issues encountered post transplant, including ongoing management of diabetic complications, prevention of bone loss, and screening for failure of the pancreas graft with reinstitution of treatment when indicated. Although long-term patient and graft survival have improved greatly after pancreas transplant, a multidisciplinary team is needed to maximize long-term quality, as well as quantity, of life for the pancreas transplant recipient.

The transplant recipient for nontransplant surgery

The transplant recipient has traded a life-threatening illness for a chronically immunosuppressed state. Subsequent anesthetic management for non-transplant surgical procedures may be challenging. The anesthesia provider must be aware of the degree of post-transplant organ dysfunction and alter anesthesia techniques accordingly. This article reviews the anesthetic concerns for patients who have undergone a variety of organ transplants.