Treatment of small coronary arteries with a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter

Paclitaxel drug-coated balloons: a review of current status and emerging applications in native coronary artery de novo lesions

The paclitaxel drug-coated balloon (DCB) is an emerging device in percutaneous coronary intervention, which has shown promising results by means of a high-concentration, rapid local release of an antirestenotic drug without the use of a durable polymer or metal scaffold. DCB have already proven effective in clinical trials for the treatment of in-stent restenosis. Its coronary applications may potentially be widened to a host of complex coronary de novo lesion subsets, such as small-caliber vessels, diabetes, and diffuse lesions, where the use of stents may be hampered by suboptimal results. Recently, this technology has rapidly evolved with newer studies added to assess the value of DCB in coronary applications other than in-stent restenosis. We present a review of the role of DCB in de novo coronary lesions based on this latest clinical evidence.

Treatment of a coronary bifurcation lesion with drug-coated balloons: lumen enlargement and plaque modification after 6 months

We report a male with a coronary bifurcation lesion in the mid circumflex artery (CX). After predilatation, the lesion was treated with two drug-coated balloons (DCB). Primary success in the posterolateral branch was good; however the CX lesion had a residual stenosis including a non-flow-limiting type A dissection. After 6 months, angiography showed slight lumen enlargement in both branches of the bifurcation. Intravascular ultrasound identified about 35 % atherosclerotic plaque load within the inner area of the bifurcation but more than 50 % concentric atherosclerotic plaque burden in the vessel areas proximal and distal to the DCB-treated area.

First in vitro and in vivo results of an anti-human CD133-antibody coated coronary stent in the porcine model

BACKGROUND

Drug-eluting stents successfully reduce restenosis at the cost of delayed re-endothelialization. A novel concept to enhance re-endothelialization is the use of antibody-coated stents which capture circulating progenitor cells. A CD34-positive-cell-capturing stent was recently developed with conflicting clinical results. CD133 is a glycoprotein expressed on circulating hematopoietic and putative endothelial-regenerating cells and may be superior to CD34.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to develop a CD133-cell-capturing bare-metal stent and investigate feasibility, safety, and efficacy of CD133-stents in terms of re-endothelialization and neointima inhibition.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Anti-human CD133-antibodies were covalently attached to bare-metal stents. In vitro, binding capacity of CD133-stents was studied, revealing a significantly higher affinity of human CD133-positive cells to CD133-stents compared with mononuclear cells (MNCs). In vivo, 15 landrace pigs received BMS and CD133-stents in either RCX or LAD (n = 30 stents). Re-endothelialization was examined on day 1 (n = 4), 3 (n = 4) and day 7 (n = 4) using scanning electron microscopy. In histology, injury and inflammatory scores, as well as diameter restenosis were evaluated after day 7 (n = 3), 14 (n = 4), and 28 (n = 2). Overall no reduction in re-endothelialization, diameter stenosis or inflammatory score was seen with CD133-stents.

CONCLUSION

Stent coating with anti-human CD133-antibodies was successfully achieved with effective binding of CD133-positive cells. However, in vivo, no difference in re-endothelialization or neointima formation was evident with the use of CD133-stents compared with BMS. The low number of circulating CD133-positive cells and an increase in unspecific binding of MNCs over time may account for the observed lack of efficacy.

Comparison of a drug-eluting balloon first and then bare metal stent with a drug-eluting stent for treatment of de novo lesions: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial

Background

The use of a drug-eluting balloon for the treatment of de novo coronary artery lesions remains to be evaluated. A previous trial in patients with stable and unstable angina comparing a bare metal stent mounted on a drug-eluting balloon with a sirolimus-eluting stent failed to meet the prespecified non-inferiority criteria versus the sirolimus-eluting stent. The stent struts of a bare metal stent pre-mounted on a drug-eluting balloon may prevent the appropriate delivery of drugs to the vessel wall and may result in reduced efficacy. In the present study we will therefore evaluate the efficacy of a drug-eluting balloon for treating de novo coronary artery lesions using a strategy designed to uniformly deliver drug to the vessel with a bare metal stent.

Methods/Design

The Comparison of Drug-Eluting Balloon first study is a prospective, randomized, open-label trial designed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of first using a drug-eluting balloon (Sequent^® please; B. Braun, Melsungen, Germany) followed by a bare metal stent (Coroflex^® Blue; B. Braun) compared with using a drug-eluting stent (Resolute Integrity™; Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA) for de novo coronary artery lesions. The primary endpoint of the study is in-segment late loss at 9 months measured by quantitative coronary angiography. Secondary endpoints include angiographic findings such as angiographic success, device success, binary angiographic restenosis, and clinical outcomes such as procedural success, all-cause death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, target lesion revascularization, and stent thrombosis. A total of 180 patients will be enrolled in the study.

Discussion

The Comparison of Drug-Eluting Balloon first study will evaluate the clinical efficacy, angiographic outcomes and safety of a drug-eluting balloon first followed by a bare metal stent compared with a drug-eluting stent for the treatment of de novo coronary artery lesions.

Trial registration

Clinical Trials.gov: NCT01539603

Assessment of efficacy and safety of combining "paclitaxel" eluting balloon and "limus" eluting stent in the same lesion

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety and efficacy of combining drug-eluting balloon (DEB) and drug-eluting stents (DES) in the same coronary lesion.

BACKGROUND

Use of DEB may not always produce optimal results or even result in dissection, compelling the operators to consider bailout stenting with bare metal stents (BMS). However, BMS may not be ideal in patients who have significant risk-profile for restenosis. We have opted for DES over BMS in such situations and present our follow-up data.

METHODS

Between 2009 and 2011, 46 patients (57 lesions) requiring bailout stenting following DEB use were treated with second-generation DES. All patients had at-least one or more risk-factors that made them vulnerable for restenosis (diabetes, chronic kidney disease, previous in-stent restenosis [ISR], and/or long diffuse lesions ≥ 30 mm).

RESULTS

Of the 57 lesions, 34 (60%) were previous ISR. The mean length of the DEB was: 36.2 ± 5.6 mm. All patients had TIMI-3 flow post PCI with no in-lab complications. At median follow-up of 12.3 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 7.5-18.1), the rates target lesion revascularization (TLR) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) were 3 (5.3%) and 4 (7%), respectively. One patient had died 3 months following treatment. There were no episodes of myocardial infarction, definite or probable stent thrombosis. The major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) rate defined as cardiac-death, MI, and TVR occurred in 11% of patients.

CONCLUSION

The results from this novel strategy of combining "Paclitaxel" eluting balloon and "Limus" eluting stent in a same lesion are encouraging. Dual drug-elution acting on two different pathways may provide potential synergy that may explain the favorable outcome.

Drug-coated balloons in treatment of in-stent restenosis: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Background

Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have been developed for the percutaneous treatment of coronary artery disease. An initial focus has been the management of in-stent restenosis (ISR) but randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have been small and powered only for angiographic endpoints.

Objective

The aim of the work was to assess the clinical and angiographic outcomes of patients treated for ISR with DCB versus control (balloon angioplasty or drug-eluting stents) by a meta-analysis of RCTs.

Methods

A comprehensive search was performed of RCTs where patients with ISR were randomly assigned to either DCB or alternative coronary intervention. Outcome measurements were death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularisation (TLR), binary definition of restenosis and in-lesion late luminal loss (LLL).

Results

Four studies were identified that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for patients treated for ISR (n = 399). Mean follow-up duration was 14.5 months. DCBs were associated with lower rates of TLR [8.8 vs. 29.7 % OR (95 % confidence interval, CI) 0.20 (0.11–0.36), p < 0.0001], binary restenosis [10.3 vs. 41.3 % OR (95 % CI) 0.13 (0.07–0.24), p < 0.00001] and MI [0.5 vs. 3.8 %, OR (95 % CI) 0.21 (0.04–1.00), p = 0.05]. No significant heterogeneity was identified.

Conclusion

Drug-coated balloons appear to be effective versus control in reducing TLR and possibly MI versus balloon angioplasty or drug-eluting stents in the management of ISR.

One-year outcome of small-vessel disease treated with sirolimus-eluting stents: a subgroup analysis of the e-SELECT registry

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the characteristics and one-year outcomes following sirolimus-eluting CYPHER Select Plus stent (SES) implantation in small (SmVD) and non-small vessel disease (NSmVD) in the international e-SELECT registry.

BACKGROUND

Large-scale registry data are lacking on DES outcomes in SmVD treatment.

METHODS

There were 4,700 SmVD (at least one vessel with estimated reference vessel diameter [RVD] < 2.5 mm, excluding 283 patients with unknown RVD vessels) and 10,139 NSmVD only patients.

RESULTS

The SmVD population was older, with more women, diabetics, and vessels treated, higher mean Charlson Comorbidity Index score (CCI), shorter lesions, and less STEMI presentation. The 1-year stent thrombosis (ST) rate (primary end-point), was significantly higher (1.3% vs. 0.7%) in SmVD versus NSmVD, mainly driven by early events. One-year major adverse cardiac event (MACE), myocardial infarction (MI), and clinically indicated target-lesion revascularization (TLR) rates were significantly higher in SmVD although death and major bleeding rates were similar in both groups. Complication rates were similar between pure (3,188 patients; only RVD < 2.5 mm) and mixed (1,795 patients; some RVD < 2.5 mm or unknown RVD) SmVD. Multivariate predictors for 1-year MACE in SmVD included saphenous vein graft or bifurcation lesions, major bleeding, any antiplatelet therapy discontinuation within 1 month, age, number of stents implanted, CCI, acute coronary syndrome, and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

CONCLUSION

SES implantation for SmVD occurs more frequently in women, diabetics, and those with multivessel disease and comorbidities. One-year ST, MACE, MI, and clinically indicated TLR rates are higher, although low overall, in SmVD or mixed SmVD patients while death rates are similar to NSmVD.

Paclitaxel-coated balloon with bare-metal stenting in patients with chronic total occlusions in native coronary arteries

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel-coated balloon plus bare-metal stenting (BMS) in chronic total occlusions (CTOs).

BACKGROUND

Drug-eluting stent implantation after recanalization of CTOs is limited by the occurrence of restenosis and risk for late stent thromboses.

METHODS

In this prospective, bicenter trial we treated 48 patients after successful chronic total occlusion (CTO) recanalization in a native coronary artery with paclitaxel-coated balloon plus BMS. Patients were matched according to stent length, reference diameter, and diabetes mellitus with 48 patients treated with Taxus stent implantation. Dual antiplatelet therapy was prescribed for 6 months. Angiographic (clinical) follow-up was obtained after 6 (12) months. Primary endpoint was in-stent late lumen loss.

RESULTS

There was no difference in patient baseline characteristics or procedural results. Stent length was 59.7 ± 32.4 mm (16-151 mm) for paclitaxel-coated balloon plus BMS versus 56.2 ± 25.9 mm (16-132 mm) for Taxus stent. Late loss was statistically not different within the stent with 0.64 ± 0.69 mm versus 0.43 ± 0.64 mm (difference 0.20 mm, 95% confidence interval -0.07 to 0.47, P = 0.14) and at the occlusion site with 0.33 ± 0.69 mm versus 0.26 ± 0.70 mm, respectively. Restenosis rate was 27.7% compared with 20.8% (P = 0.44) and the combined clinical endpoint (cardiac death, myocardial infarction attributed to the target vessel, target lesion revascularization) was 14.6% versus 18.8% (P = 0.58), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, for patients with complex CTOs in native coronary arteries the use of paclitaxel-coated balloon after bare-metal stenting was associated with similar clinical results and a nonsignificantly higher in-stent late loss compared with a matched population with paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation.

[Use of drug-eluting balloons for coronary interventions: current indications and perspectives]

The paclitaxel-eluting balloon is an emerging percutaneous coronary angioplasty tool which aim is to prevent restenosis by delivering a high intravessel paclitaxel dose during balloon inflation. It has been already approved in the treatment of bare metal stent restenosis and is being investigated in drug-eluting stent restenosis. For the treatment of de novo lesions, it could be used alone or in combination with bare metal stent implantation. Most interesting results were obtained by a drug-eluting balloon alone strategy in small vessels angioplasty. Current and upcoming results of this evolving technology are reviewed.

SeQuentPlease World Wide Registry: clinical results of SeQuent please paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty in a large-scale, prospective registry study

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess the safety and efficacy of paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) angioplasty in an international, multicenter, prospective, large-scale registry study.

BACKGROUND

In small randomized trials, PCB angioplasty was superior to uncoated balloon angioplasty for treatment of bare-metal stent (BMS) and drug-eluting stent (DES) restenosis.

METHODS

Patients treated with SeQuent Please PCBs were included. The primary outcome measure was the clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate at 9 months.

RESULTS

At 75 centers, 2,095 patients with 2,234 lesions were included. The TLR rate was 5.2% after 9.4 months. Definite vessel thrombosis occurred in 0.1%. PCB angioplasty was performed in 1,523 patients (72.7%) with DES or BMS restenosis and 572 patients (27.3%) with de novo lesions. The TLR rate was significantly lower in patients with PCB angioplasty for BMS restenosis compared with DES restenosis (3.8% vs. 9.6%, p < 0.001). The TLR rate did not differ for PCB angioplasty of paclitaxel-eluting stent and non-paclitaxel-eluting sten restenosis (8.3% vs. 10.8%, p = 0.46). In de novo lesions (small vessels), the TLR rate was low and did not differ between PCB angioplasty with and without additional BMS implantation (p = 0.31).

CONCLUSIONS

PCB angioplasty in an all-comers, prospective, multicenter registry was safe and confirmed in a large population the low TLR rates seen in randomized clinical trials. PCB angioplasty was more effective in BMS restenosis compared with DES restenosis, with no difference regarding the type of DES.

New technologies aimed at percutaneous intervention in the small coronary artery

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of small vessels can be complicated by technically difficult access to the target lesion, an increased risk of major adverse cardiac events and in-stent restenosis requiring repeat revascularization. Conventional management of such lesions is with drug-eluting stent implantation; however, these have only partly attenuated the problem. In response, several medical device companies are competing to produce new technologies aimed at PCI in small coronary arteries. Such innovations include thin-strutted stents, stent-on-a-wire systems, drug-coated balloons, endothelial progenitor cell-catching stents and biodegradable stent systems. To date, none of these techniques have been sufficiently validated for use in small coronary arteries to justify a change in practice; however, small-vessel coronary artery disease is an increasingly common problem, and PCI of target lesions with reference vessel diameter <3.0 mm is likely to increase, especially in view of the increasing prevalence of diabetes, warranting further well-designed studies. The prospect of mounting a self-expandable biodegradable drug-eluting stent directly onto a guidewire could potentially be an exciting future development.

Cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty and paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation for treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis in patients with stable coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR). The cost-effectiveness of this practice is unknown.

METHODS

A Markov state-transition decision analytic model accounting for varying procedural efficacy rates, complication rates, and cost estimates was developed to compare DCB angioplasty with drug-eluting stent (DES) placement in patients with bare-metal stent (BMS)-ISR. Data on procedural outcomes associated with both treatment strategies were derived from the literature, and the cost analysis was conducted from a health care payer perspective. Effectiveness was expressed as life-years gained.

RESULTS

In the base-case analysis, initial procedure costs amounted to €3,604.14 for DCB angioplasty and to €3,309.66 for DES implantation. Over a 12-month time horizon, the DCB strategy was found to be less costly (€4,130.38 vs. €5,305.30) and slightly more effective in terms of life expectancy (0.983 vs. 0.976 years) than the DES strategy. Extensive sensitivity analyses indicated that, in comparison with DES implantation, the cost advantage of the DCB strategy was robust to clinically plausible variations in the values of key model input parameters. The variables with the greatest impact on base-case results were the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy with acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel after DCB angioplasty, the use of generic clopidogrel, and variations in the costs associated with the DCB device.

CONCLUSION

DCB angioplasty is a cost-effective treatment option for coronary BMS-ISR. The higher initial costs of DCB are more than offset by later cost-savings, predominantly as a result of reduced medication costs.

Antiplatelet therapy in the era of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting balloons

The high rate of restenosis associated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures can be reduced with the implantation of metallic stents into the stenotic vessels. The knowledge that neointimal formation can result in restenosis after stent implantation led to the development of drug-eluting stents (DES) which require long lasting antiplatelet therapy to avoid thrombotic complications. In the last years, the drug-eluting balloon (DEB) technology has emerged as an alternative option for the treatment of coronary and peripheral arteries. Clinical studies demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of DEB in various clinical scenarios and support the use of paclitaxel-eluting balloons for the treatment of in-stent restenosis, of small coronary arteries and bifurcations lesions. The protocols of DEB studies suggest that the dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel of four weeks after DEB is safe and effective.

No-Reflow Phenomenon During Treatment of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis With a Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Catheter

Drug-eluting balloon (DEB) with angioplasty a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter is an effective treatment option in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) after a drug-eluting stent (DES). We describe a case in which 'no-reflow' phenomenon developed after DEB angioplasty of a DES ISR lesion. Coronary flow was restored after intracoronary administration of nicorandil.

Analysis of potential cost-savings after introduction of drug-eluting balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis or small vessel disease

Background and Objectives

The drug-eluting balloon (DEB) catheter system was developed to treat restenosis. Furthermore, DEB angioplasty has been shown to reduce restenosis risk when compared to drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) or small vessel disease (SVD). In addition, DEB angioplasty reduces costs due to fewer revascularizations and reduced clopidogrel treatment length. The objective of this study was to predict the expected cost-savings when DEB is substituted for DES in patients with ISR or SVD.

Subjects and Methods

The subjects included were patients treated by DES at Seoul National University Hospital from January 2006 to June 2009, with clinical data after percutaneous coronary intervention, were. A model was developed to allow the costs of DES and the calculated costs of DEB incurred by patients with ISR or SVD to be compared. The overall cost of DEB was calculated to be 1,256,150 won and the overall cost of DES was 2,102,500 won, and the cost of clopidogrel was 2,168 won. Expected repeat revascularizations within 12 months of DEB were calculated based on information provided by the Paclitaxel-Eluting PTCA-Balloon Catheter in Coronary Artery (PEPCAD) I and II trials.

Results

By substituting DEB for DES, total cost (including the cost of initial DEB treatment, the cost of repeat revascularization after DEB treatment, and the cost of clopidogrel treatment) was found to be 34% lower in ISR patients and 48% lower in SVD patients.

Conclusion

DEB angioplasty will significantly reduce costs as compared to DES in ISR and in SVD patients.

Two cases of percutaneous intervention for coronary artery bypass graft anastomoses with Paclitaxel-eluting balloon catheters

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) intervention, particularly anastomosis site intervention, is challenging for interventional cardiologists. A paclitaxel-eluting balloon catheter (SeQuent Please) is a recently-introduced device capable of delivering paclitaxel homogeneously into the targeted vessel wall. We herein report our experience with two cases. In the first case, coronary angiography showed significant stenosis at the site of anastomosis between the saphenous vein graft and the left anterior descending artery (LAD). In the second case, coronary angiography showed significant stenosis at the site of anastomosis between the left internal mammary artery and the LAD. We performed percutaneous intervention of these CABG anastomoses using paclitaxel-eluting balloon catheters, and obtained favorable angiographic and clinical outcomes.

High-throughput screening of PLGA thin films utilizing hydrophobic fluorescent dyes for hydrophobic drug compounds

Hydrophobic, antirestenotic drugs such as paclitaxel (PCTX) and rapamycin are often incorporated into thin film coatings for local delivery using implantable medical devices and polymers such as drug-eluting stents and balloons. Selecting the optimum coating formulation through screening the release profile of these drugs in thin films is time consuming and labor intensive. We describe here a high-throughput assay utilizing three model hydrophobic fluorescent compounds: fluorescein diacetate (FDAc), coumarin-6, and rhodamine 6G that were incorporated into poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) and PLGA-polyethylene glycol films. Raman microscopy determined the hydrophobic fluorescent dye distribution within the PLGA thin films in comparison with that of PCTX. Their subsequent release was screened in a high-throughput assay and directly compared with HPLC quantification of PCTX release. It was observed that PCTX controlled-release kinetics could be mimicked by a hydrophobic dye that had similar octanol-water partition coefficient values and homogeneous dissolution in a PLGA matrix as the drug. In particular, FDAc was found to be the optimal hydrophobic dye at modeling the burst release as well as the total amount of PCTX released over a period of 30 days.

Acute vasomotor paralysis and potential downstream effects of paclitaxel from stents implanted for saphenous vein aorto-coronary bypass stenosis

Implantation of bare metal stents (BMS) induces the release not only of particulate debris, but also of soluble vasoconstrictors which contribute to microvascular impairment. So this study aimed at addressing the potential attenuation of such vasoconstriction using paclitaxel eluting stents (PES). Using a distal protection/aspiration device, coronary arterial blood was retrieved before and during stent [n = 14 BMS, n = 14 PES, n = 3 sirolimus eluting stents (SES)] implantation in patients with saphenous vein aorto-coronary bypass stenosis and analyzed for plasma serotonin and thromboxane B(2) concentrations. The vasoconstriction of rat mesenteric arteries with intact (+E) and denuded (-E) endothelium in response to coronary arterial or aspirate plasma was quantified and normalized to that by potassium chloride (KCl(max) = 100%). Coronary arterial plasma before stent implantation induced a vasoconstriction of 30-43%, which was independent of endothelial integrity. Serotonin-release was 2.2 ± 0.5 μmol/l with BMS and 2.0 ± 0.4 μmol/l with PES, thromboxane B(2)-release was 26 ± 5 pg/ml with BMS and 22 ± 8 pg/ml with PES. BMS- and SES-aspirate plasma induced a vasoconstriction of 68 ± 18% (+E)/93 ± 14% (-E) and 81 ± 17% (+E)/124 ± 14% (-E), respectively. In contrast, PES-aspirate plasma induced only minor vasoconstriction of 8 ± 3% (+E)/12 ± 5% (-E). Addition of paclitaxel to BMS-aspirate plasma attenuated vasoconstriction. PES-aspirate induced microtubular condensation in immunofluorescence microscopy. Results indicate that aspirate from PES implantation attenuates vasoconstriction, possibly secondary to microtubular stabilization. Such acute downstream vascular paralysis could be beneficial in preventing a no-reflow phenomenon in patients undergoing stenting.

Drug eluting balloons for the treatment of coronary artery disease: What can we expect?

Drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) represent an enhancement of the therapeutic repertoire for the interventional cardiologist. The therapeutic concept of DEBs is promising, notably on the basis of initial studies in patients with diffuse in-stent restenosis (ISR). At present, however, a number of questions regarding long-term efficacy and safety remain, specifically in indications other than diffuse ISR. The results of the evaluation of different substances, balloon systems and clinical indications will determine the long-term success of DEBs.

Hotlines and clinical trial updates presented at the German Cardiac Society Meeting 2010: FAIR-HF, CIPAMI, LIPSIA-NSTEMI, Handheld-BNP, PEPCAD III, remote ischaemic conditioning, CERTIFY, PreSCD-II, German Myocardial Infarction Registry, DiaRegis

This article summarizes the results of a number of clinical trials and registries in the field of cardiovascular medicine which were presented during the Hotline Sessions at the annual meeting of the German Cardiac Society, held in Mannheim, Germany, from 8th to 10th April 2010. The data were presented by leading experts in the field with relevant positions in the trials. It is important to note that unpublished reports should be considered as preliminary data, as the analysis may change in the final publications. The comprehensive summaries have been generated from the oral presentation and should provide the readers with the most comprehensive information on diagnostic and therapeutic development in cardiovascular medicine similar as previously reported (Maier et al. in Clin Res Cardiol 98:345-352, 2009; 98:413-419, 2009).