Comparison of blood vessel sealing among new electrosurgical and ultrasonic devices

Laparoscopic myomectomy of a subserous pedunculated fibroid at 14 weeks of pregnancy: a case report

Introduction

Uterine leiomyomas are seen in 1.6% to 4% of pregnancies. With the increasing age of obstetric patients, more cases are being encountered during pregnancy.

Case presentation

We report the case of a 31-year-old Caucasian woman with acute recurrent abdominal pain due to a subserous fundic myoma, measuring 48 × 52 × 63 mm, with an implantation base of 22 × 18 mm, which was successfully treated by laparoscopy at 14 weeks of pregnancy. At a gestational age of week 40, the patient spontaneously delivered a healthy 3216 g girl baby.

Conclusion

As far as we know, this is the first reported case of laparoscopic myomectomy this early during a pregnancy. Our experience together with an analysis of cases reported in the literature suggests that myomectomy during pregnancy may be considered safe, but only in the hands of experienced laparoscopic surgeons. There are a few reports in the literature about laparoscopic myomectomy during the first half of pregnancy that demonstrate its feasibility in selected cases. Some technical tools could improve the procedure with a minimum of risk for the ongoing pregnancy.

Electrosurgery in urology: recent advances

Inadequate hemostasis is one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality following urological surgery. Despite the long-term usage of coagulation, there is an ongoing development of new devices, including bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate or new vessel-sealing devices. A thorough understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of these new instruments can improve the operative experience for both the urologist and patient. The optimal coagulation system should be small, efficient, easy to handle and with low heat spread. In this article, we analyze different electrothermal coagulation systems and modern tissue-sealing devices in urological applications with the aim to substantiate the advantages and disadvantages of each technique in terms of efficacy and safety.

Bipolar electrothermal vessel sealing system and 5-mm 2 expandable trocar approach in pediatric laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a successful time-effective technical refinement

BACKGROUND

To present our initial experience with electrothermal bipolar vessel device and only 2 expandable ports for laparoscopic Palomo varicocele procedure in pediatric and adolescent population.

METHODS

In a 3-year period between 2006 and 2009, sixty-three boys and adolescents diagnosed in our institution as having varicocele underwent Palomo laparoscopic surgery with a two 5-mm expandable-trocar laparoscopic approach using the LigaSure technology (Valleylab Inc., Covidien, Boulder, CO) for spermatic vessels sealing. The outcome variables recorded for analysis were age at presentation, symptoms, varicocele grade based on Dubin and Amelar Classification, testicular atrophy, operative time, complications, recurrence, and reactive hydrocele formation. Mean follow-up was 1.8 years (range, 6 mo to 3 y).

RESULTS

Children's age at diagnosis ranged between 9 and 19 years. Mean age at operation was 14.8 ± 1.2 years. All cases were left side varicoceles and 70% had grade III varicocele. Testicular atrophy was noticed in 39.8% of cases. All boys underwent Palomo laparoscopic sealing of the spermatic vessels using bipolar vascular electrothermal device Ligasure with a 2-trocar approach. Mean operative surgery time was 21 minutes. Median hospital stay was 21 ± 8 hours. No conversion cases were registered. Nine patients developed hydrocele after laparoscopic procedure (14.2%). Three patients of these cases underwent Winkelman-Lord's hydrocelectomy (4.7% of total).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic Palomo varicocele surgery for pediatric patients using Ligasure as spermatic vessels sealant and only 2 radially expandable 5-mm trocars is a safe, feasible, and time-effective technical improvement.

In search of the autologous clip: a case for experimental standardization

BACKGROUND

In an effort to enable faster and, at times, more challenging surgeries without compromising patient or physician safety, medical device manufacturers have created myriad solutions to vascular ligation through the development of novel tools. The speed of development, FDA approval, and dissemination of these devices into the hands of surgeons often outpaces the ability of investigators to critically evaluate comparative effectiveness of these devices.

DATABASE

The Medline database was searched for energy-based vessel ligation devices. To remove any perception bias against non-Covidien instruments, critical review was applied only to the devices manufactured by our company.

CONCLUSIONS

We report on the variability present in published results and offer vital metrics for future studies. Standardized testing and reporting for measures of safety and efficacy of these surgical instruments awaits definition from a consensus group.

Energy source instruments for laparoscopic colectomy

BACKGROUND

Colectomy is a common procedures for both benign and malignant conditions. Increasingly more colectomy has been performed laparoscopically and there are several available instruments being used for this procedure. Of which three common dissecting instruments are: monopolar electrocautery scissors (MES), ultrasonic coagulating shears (UCS) and electrothermal bipolar vessel sealers (EBVS). 

OBJECTIVES

The aim is to assess the safety and effectiveness of these instruments.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Studies were identified from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Colorectal Cancer Group Trials Register.  Major journals were specifically hand searched.  All randomised controlled trials were included.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All patients underwent elective laparoscopic or laparoscopic-assisted right, left or total colectomy or anterior resection for either benign or malignant conditions were included in the study.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently selected studies from the literature searches, assessed the methodological quality of the trials and extracted data. The three primary outcomes were: overall blood loss, complications and operating time.

MAIN RESULTS

Six randomised controlled trials including 446 participants. Two trials compared three types of instruments (MES vs UCS vs EBVS). One trial compared MES and UCS. One trial compared UCS and EBVS. One trial compared 5 mm versus 10 mm EBVS. One trial compared the technique of laparoscopic staplers and clips versus EBVS in pedicle ligation during laparoscopic colectomy. The limitation of this review is the heterogeneity of the trials included. The measured outcomes were covered by one to three studies with small number of participants. With this in mind, there was significant less blood loss in UCS compared to MES. The operating time was significantly shorter with the use of EBVS than MES. No difference between UCS and EBVS apart from EBVS appeared to be handling better than UCS in one study. Haemostatic control was better in UCS and EBVS over MES. No definite conclusion on the cost difference between these three instrument but this would lie in the balance between the instrument cost and the operating time. The handling of 5 mm EBVS was better than 10 mm and its main advantage was trocar flexibility. Laparoscopic staplers/clips used for pedicle ligation in colectomy associated with more failure in vessel ligation and cost more when compared to EBVS.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The limitations of this review is the small number of trials and heterogeneity of the studies included. With the current evidence it is not possible to demonstrate which is the best instrument in laparoscopic colectomy. Hopefully more data would follow and subsequent updates of this review could become more informative.

Safe use of ultrasonically activated devices based on current studies

Ultrasonically activated devices (USADs) are a widely used alternative to suture ligation and clips in open and laparoscopic surgery because of their fast and easy control of bleeding without significant complications. By inducing protein denaturation and forming coaptive coagulation to seal vessels for cutting tissue, USADs result in reduced operating time, blood loss and hospital stay. Recently, various other types of vessel sealers have become available. In this article, we summarize the mechanism, efficacy and the advantages and disadvantages of USADs for appropriate use in surgery.

Experimental comparison of mesenteric vessel sealing and thermal damage between one bipolar and two ultrasonic shears devices

BACKGROUND

Several instruments are available for open and laparoscopic dissection, including electrothermal bipolar vessel sealers and ultrasonically coagulating shears. The vessel sealing ability of three devices in colorectal specimens was compared in an experimental study.

METHODS

Surgical specimens from patients scheduled for elective open or laparoscopic colorectal resection were allocated to one of the three devices. After removal of the surgical specimen, up to eight mesenteric vessels were dissected ex vivo and sealed using the allocated instrument. The vessel seal was tested for the maximum pressure at which it leaked and then assessed by a pathologist for depth of thermal tissue damage.

RESULTS

A total of 93 vessels from 18 patients were assessed ex vivo (LOTUS™ n = 33; Harmonic Ace® n = 30; LigaSure™ n = 30), a median of 6 (range 1-8) vessels per surgical specimen with a mean(s.d.) diameter of 1·06(0·70) mm and wall thickness of 0·29(0·19) mm. Mean(s.d.) bursting pressures were 1170(440), 1470(670) and 1510(740) mmHg with LOTUS(™) , Harmonic Ace® and LigaSure™ respectively. ANCOVA showed no difference in bursting pressure between the instruments (P = 0·058). The depth of thermal damage was significantly greater with LigaSure™ (3·37(1·44) mm) than with LOTUS(™) (2·18(0·99) mm; P < 0·001) or Harmonic Ace® (1·95(0·92) mm; P < 0·001).

CONCLUSION

All three instruments were equally good at sealing blood vessels, with bursting pressures well above physiological blood pressure levels.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01121614 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Collagen-elastin ratio predicts burst pressure of arterial seals created using a bipolar vessel sealing device in a porcine model

BACKGROUND

Bipolar electrosurgical devices are used to generate rapid and efficient hemostasis in a wide range of surgical procedures. Of the factors that influence seal integrity, vessel (artery) diameter has been considered the most important variable. In this study we hypothesized that the relative ratio of the components that form the seal (collagen and elastin) determine the degree of vessel distensibility and play an equally important role in defining seal strength.

METHODS

Porcine carotid, renal, iliac, and femoral arteries were sealed using a bipolar electrosurgical device in vivo. Following removal, arterial diameter was measured and vessels' seals tested for arterial burst pressure (ABPr). Samples were then analyzed histologically and biochemically for collagen and elastin content.

RESULTS

Arteries with the highest collagen-elastin ratio (C/E) (renal) consistently demonstrated significantly higher burst pressures than those arteries with lower C/E ratios (iliac and femoral) independent of artery diameter.

CONCLUSION

Using arteries of distinct anatomical origin and physiological function, we demonstrate that total collagen content, and more specifically C/E ratio, in porcine arteries is a more accurate predictor of ABPr than vessel size alone.

Surgical vein occlusion--comparison of four different methods in a rat model

BACKGROUND

Among many aspects, wound healing depends on early restoration of venous blood flow across wound margins. The type of surgical occlusion of vein stumps during operations was assumed to have an influence on the early postoperative reunion of vein stumps and thereby on wound healing. Currently, there are different methods of vein stump occlusion available: ligation (e.g., Vicryl), closure using metal clips (e.g., LigaClip), coagulation using manually controlled bipolar forceps, and the use of a computer-controlled bipolar system (e.g., BiClamp). The aim of this study was to surgically and histologically compare the healing process, including new vessel formation after vein occlusion using one of the methods listed.

METHODS

In a rat model (n = 50), both jugular and femoral veins were prepared, occluded twice with one of the methods mentioned above (i.e., 400 occlusions), and finally cut in-between. Groups of 10 animals were reoperated and evaluated surgically and histologically after 5 days, 10 days, 15 days, 30 days, and 90 days.

RESULTS

Occlusion methods using Vicryl, LigaClip, or bipolar forceps allow highly reliable vessel occlusion. Surgical evaluation showed higher occurrence of vessels in between the vein stumps after usage of Vicryl and LigaClip when compared with electrothermic occlusion methods (p = 0.017). Histologic examination showed different courses of the inflammatory reaction and varying capillary counts. Bipolar occlusion methods do cause less vessel occurrence, less inflammatory reaction, and less histologic capillary formation.

CONCLUSION

If a reconnection of the venous flow is desirable, the use of Vicryl and LigaClip might be superior to using electrothermic occlusion methods. In contrast, electrothermic methods cause less new vessel formation as well as less inflammatory reaction.

Cystic duct closure by sealing with bipolar electrocoagulation

A bipolar electrosurgical device was found to provide safe division and effective closure of the cystic duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Background:

Cystic duct leakage after cholecystectomy is not uncommon and is a potentially serious complication. The aim of this study was to assess a bipolar sealing system (LigaSure^®) for closure of the cystic duct.

Methods:

The records from consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed in 2 hospitals with closure of the cystic duct with LigaSure after informed consent were recorded and complications and morbidity registered. The records were compared with those of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with closure of the cystic duct with clips during the same period.

Results:

During the study period, 218 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed; 102 of these were performed with the LigaSure. One patient was excluded due to violation of the protocol. We experienced no cases of cystic duct leakage, but in one patient, bile leakage from the gallbladder bed was observed probably due to a small aberrant duct.

Conclusion:

The LigaSure system was safe and effective for closure and division of the cystic duct in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.