Hemodynamic consequences of high- and low-pressure capnoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Anaesthetic considerations for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Minimally invasive surgical procedures aim to minimize the trauma of the interventional process but still achieve a satisfactory therapeutic result. Tissue trauma is significantly less than that with conventional open procedures, offering the advantages of reduced post-operative pain, shorter hospital stay, more rapid return to normal activities and significant cost savings. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is now a routinely performed procedure and has replaced conventional open cholecystectomy as the procedure of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Public expectation and developments in instrumentation have fuelled this change. The physiological effects of intraperitoneal carbon dioxide insufflation combined with variations in patient positioning can have a major impact on cardiorespiratory function, particularly in elderly patients with co-morbidities. Intra-operative complications may include traumatic injuries associated with blind trocar insertion, gas embolism, pneumothorax and surgical emphysema associated with extraperitoneal insufflation. Appropriate monitoring and a high index of suspicion can result in early diagnosis of, and treatment of, complications. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has proven to be a major advance in the treatment of patients with symptomatic gallbladder disease.

Transoesophageal acoustic quantification for evaluation of cardiac function during laparoscopic surgery

Pneumoperitoneum may be poorly tolerated in patients with marginal cardiopulmonary function. Transoesophageal echocardiography is a relatively non-invasive technique that can track changes in left ventricular cavity area using acoustic quantification and has been found to provide a reliable, real-time estimation of left ventricular function. We evaluated mid-papillary fractional area change during pneumoperitoneum in 17 healthy adult patients (group 1) and 17 with hypertension and/or ischaemic heart disease (group 2) undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Peritoneal insufflation led to significant (p < 0.01) decreases in fractional area change and an increase in mean blood pressure. There was no significant change in heart rate. Patients with cardiovascular disease who had a > 30% decrease in fractional area change following carbon dioxide insufflation (group 2B) were given an intravenous infusion of glyceryl trinitrate. In groups 1 and 2A, fractional area change improved slightly with head-up tilt and continued to improve over the course of surgery. Glyceryl trinitrate led to a significant increase in fractional area change and a decrease in mean blood pressure back to baseline values. We conclude that peritoneal insufflation of carbon dioxide results in a significant increase in cardiac workload that is well tolerated in patients with no cardiovascular disease. Coexisting cardiovascular disease can result in even more pronounced impairment of cardiac function, which may not be predictable by clinical assessment or adequately determined by routine monitoring. We recommend the use of transoesophageal acoustic quantification as a monitor in these patients and the administration of glyceryl trinitrate to ameliorate myocardial stress.

Physiologic changes during laparoscopy

The short-term benefits of minimal access techniques include less pain, early mobilization, and shorter hospital stay. Nonetheless, significant data have accumulated regarding the complications associated with laparoscopic techniques, including those that are unique to laparoscopic surgery such as bile duct injury and disruption of major blood vessels. Other problems such as myocardial ischemia and respiratory acidosis are associated with the cardiopulmonary effects of pneumoperitoneum and systemic CO2 absorption. These physiologic changes, although tolerated by healthy patients, could have particular adverse consequences for infirm and critically ill patients. It would appear that minimizing IAP during insufflation decreases the risk of potentially marked cardiovascular changes and regional blood flow alterations. In turn, this could arguably decrease the risk of perioperative myocardial events, or organ dysfunction or failure. Laparoscopy in the critically ill patient is questionable because the role is not established. An ICU patient has little to gain from the benefits of early mobilization. Conversely, in the presence of raised ICP or borderline organ function, the physiologic changes associated with pneumoperitoneum and laparoscopy could have profound detrimental effects.

Applicability of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease

BACKGROUND

The advantages of laparoscopic colorectal surgery for selected patients have been well established. However, the applicability of laparoscopic surgery in the whole population of patients with colorectal disease is not well known.

METHODS

A single-institution medical records review of 269 patients subjected to colorectal surgery was made. Of these, 206 open colorectal procedures were performed, and data were reviewed retrospectively. In addition, 63 patients were subjected to laparoscopy, and their data were recorded prospectively. An analysis of the existence of factors that contraindicate laparoscopic colorectal surgery was done. These factors were of two types: absolute (urgent intervention, severe cardiopulmonary disease, advanced liver cirrhosis, tumor invasion into adjacent organs, simultaneous major surgery) and relative (midrectal tumors, tumors in the transverse colon, bulky tumors, more than two previous infraumbilical operations, previous intestinal surgery, and previous peritonitis).

RESULTS

Factors that could contraindicate the laparoscopic approach were found in 118 patients (44%). The most common were urgent intervention (40%), midrectal tumors (19%), locally advanced cancer (13%), previous intestinal surgery (13%), and tumors >10 cm (6%). We considered 25% of the contraindications to be absolute and 19% relative. Taking these exclusion criteria into consideration when selecting patients for laparoscopic surgery, the conversion rate in our initial laparoscopic series (63 cases) was 13%.

CONCLUSION

The indication for laparoscopic surgery for patients with colorectal disease is superior to 60% (absolute 56%, relative 81%). When using appropriate selection criteria, the conversion rate may be maintained below 10%. Preoperative selection of patients with colorectal disease allows optimal use of the advantages of laparoscopic surgery.

Minimizing ports to improve laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

Minimizing the number and scope of ports used to perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy attempts to build on the improvements in postoperative pain control, rapid return to activity and work, patient satisfaction, and cosmetic result achieved by the laparoscopic method.

METHODS

We studied 141 patients in two sequential studies: the first a prospective randomized trial with 41 patients, and the second an examination of the more minimal procedure in 100 patients. In the randomized trial, patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with three ports: three 5-mm ports or two 10-mm ports and one 5-mm port. The 100 patients underwent the three 5-mm port procedure.

RESULTS

In the randomized trial, differences were not statistically significant. However, on the average, the group with three 5-mm ports required less medication over less time, had less postoperative pain, and took less time to return to activity than the second group with larger ports. A statistically significant difference was found in incisional pain between the smaller group (21 patients) with two 10-mm ports and one 5-mm port and the larger group (100 patients) with three 5-mm ports, whether the measure was overall incisional pain (p = 0.014) or a comparison based on specific ports (p = 0.001). The percentage of cases requiring port enlargement to remove the gallbladder was not significantly different between the groups. There were no conversions to an open procedure, no fourth trocars added, and no complications. No patient required overnight hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

Reducing the number and size of ports in laparoscopic cholecystectomy sustains or enhances the improvements initiated by performing laparoscopic rather than open cholecystectomy. In a comparison of microlaparoscopic procedures, patients undergoing the procedure with the shorter incisions experienced significantly less pain.