The Frozen Elephant Trunk for the Treatment of Chronic Dissection of the Thoracic Aorta: A Multicenter Experience

Open stent grafting for complex diseases of the thoracic aorta: clinical utility

Open stent grafting is an alternative treatment for extensive thoracic aortic replacement. However, this procedure is associated with a high incidence of spinal cord injury, which has limited its application. Multiple factors have been suggested to explain the risk of spinal cord injury, including deep delivery of the stent graft, history of operation of the downstream aorta, and postoperative low blood pressure. Cerebrospinal fluid drainage or a hybrid operation in combination with trans-femoral thoracic stent grafting is useful for preventing spinal cord injury. Open stent grafting remains an alternative treatment for atherosclerotic aneurysms with dilatation of the ascending aorta. Open stent grafting for acute aortic dissection is effective for remodeling of the false lumen. The graft diameter for aortic dissection should be 90 % of the total diameter of the aorta, and the distal landing zone should be limited to the T7 vertebral level to prevent new intimal tears or spinal cord injury. Open stent grafting seems a feasible bailout strategy for the treatment of retrograde aortic dissection after TEVAR for type B aortic dissection. Newly designed devices for open stent grafts include the Matsui-Kitamura stent graft or branched open stent graft, which is produced in Japan. The effectiveness of open stent grafting in the treatment of Marfan syndrome remains unclear. A commercially available device for open stent grafting would be desired in Japan. In conclusion, an open stent graft remains an alternative treatment for complex thoracic aortic pathologies.

Predictors of outcome after endovascular repair for chronic type B dissection

OBJECTIVES

To assess the durability of endovascular repair (TEVAR) in chronic type B dissection (CD) and identify factors predictive of outcome.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of a prospective database.

MATERIALS

Patients undergoing TEVAR for CD at a tertiary referral centre 2000-2010.

METHODS

Analysis of pre-operative characteristics, operative outcome, false lumen thrombosis, aortic diameter and survival.

RESULTS

58 consecutive patients were included (49 elective, 9 urgent, mean age 66 years). Mean aortic diameter was 6.4 cm (Standard deviation SD 1.3 cm). Three patients died perioperatively (5%, 1 urgent, 2 elective). Complications included retrograde type A dissection (n = 3), paraplegia (1), and transient ischaemic attack (1). Estimated survival (Kaplan-Meier) was 89% (1-year) and 64% (3-years). Forty-seven patients had mid-term imaging follow-up at mean 38 months. Reintervention rate was 15% at 1-year and 29% at 3-years. Aortic diameter decreased in 24, was stable in 15 and increased in 8. Mid-term survival was higher in patients with aortic remodelling (reduction of aortic diameter >0.5 cm; 3-year 89%) than without (54%; Log Rank p = 0.005). Remodelling occurred with extensive false lumen thrombosis.

CONCLUSION

Satisfactory mid-term outcome after TEVAR for CD remains a challenge. Survival is associated with aortic remodelling, which is related to persistence of flow in the false lumen.