101
|
Chan KWY, Yu T, Qiao Y, Liu Q, Yang M, Patel H, Liu G, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Bulte JWM, van Zijl PCM, Hanes J, Zhou S, McMahon MT. A diaCEST MRI approach for monitoring liposomal accumulation in tumors. J Control Release 2014; 180:51-9. [PMID: 24548481 DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2013] [Revised: 01/30/2014] [Accepted: 02/07/2014] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Nanocarrier-based chemotherapy allows preferential delivery of therapeutics to tumors and has been found to improve the efficacy of cancer treatment. However, difficulties in tracking nanocarriers and evaluating their pharmacological fates in patients have limited judicious selection of patients to those who might most benefit from nanotherapeutics. To enable the monitoring of nanocarriers in vivo, we developed MRI-traceable diamagnetic Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (diaCEST) liposomes. The diaCEST liposomes were based on the clinical formulation of liposomal doxorubicin (i.e. DOXIL®) and were loaded with barbituric acid (BA), a small, organic, biocompatible diaCEST contrast agent. The optimized diaCEST liposomal formulation with a BA-to-lipid ratio of 25% exhibited 30% contrast enhancement at B1=4.7μT in vitro. The contrast was stable, with ~80% of the initial CEST signal sustained over 8h in vitro. We used the diaCEST liposomes to monitor the response to tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), an agent in clinical trials that increases vascular permeability and uptake of nanocarriers into tumors. After systemic administration of diaCEST liposomes to mice bearing CT26 tumors, we found an average diaCEST contrast at the BA frequency (5ppm) of 0.4% at B1=4.7μT while if TNF-α was co-administered the contrast increased to 1.5%. This novel approach provides a non-radioactive, non-metallic, biocompatible, semi-quantitative, and clinically translatable approach to evaluate the tumor targeting of stealth liposomes in vivo, which may enable personalized nanomedicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kannie W Y Chan
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Division of MR Research, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore 21287, USA; F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore 21205, USA; Center for Nanomedicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore 21287, USA; Cellular Imaging Section and Vascular Biology Program, Institute for Cell Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore 21205, USA
| | - Tao Yu
- Center for Nanomedicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore 21287, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore 21205, USA
| | - Yuan Qiao
- The Ludwig Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at the Hopkins-Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore 21287, USA
| | - Qiang Liu
- The Ludwig Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at the Hopkins-Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore 21287, USA
| | - Ming Yang
- Center for Nanomedicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore 21287, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore 21205, USA
| | - Himatkumar Patel
- Center for Nanomedicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore 21287, USA
| | - Guanshu Liu
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Division of MR Research, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore 21287, USA; F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore 21205, USA
| | - Kenneth W Kinzler
- The Ludwig Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at the Hopkins-Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore 21287, USA
| | - Bert Vogelstein
- The Ludwig Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at the Hopkins-Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore 21287, USA
| | - Jeff W M Bulte
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Division of MR Research, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore 21287, USA; F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore 21205, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore 21205, USA; Cellular Imaging Section and Vascular Biology Program, Institute for Cell Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore 21205, USA
| | - Peter C M van Zijl
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Division of MR Research, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore 21287, USA; F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore 21205, USA
| | - Justin Hanes
- Center for Nanomedicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore 21287, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore 21205, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, The Wilmer Eye Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore 21287, USA
| | - Shibin Zhou
- The Ludwig Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at the Hopkins-Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore 21287, USA
| | - Michael T McMahon
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Division of MR Research, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore 21287, USA; F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore 21205, USA; Center for Nanomedicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore 21287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
102
|
Stroka KM, Konstantopoulos K. Physical biology in cancer. 4. Physical cues guide tumor cell adhesion and migration. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2014; 306:C98-C109. [PMID: 24133064 PMCID: PMC3919991 DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00289.2013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2013] [Accepted: 10/15/2013] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
As tumor cells metastasize from the primary tumor location to a distant secondary site, they encounter an array of biologically and physically heterogeneous microenvironments. While it is well established that biochemical signals guide all stages of the metastatic cascade, mounting evidence indicates that physical cues also direct tumor cell behavior, including adhesion and migration phenotypes. Physical cues acting on tumor cells in vivo include extracellular matrix mechanical properties, dimensionality, and topography, as well as interstitial flow, hydrodynamic shear stresses, and local forces due to neighboring cells. State-of-the-art technologies have recently enabled us and other researchers to engineer cell microenvironments that mimic specific physical properties of the cellular milieu. Through integration of these engineering strategies, along with physics, molecular biology, and imaging techniques, we have acquired new insights into tumor cell adhesion and migration mechanisms. In this review, we focus on the extravasation and invasion stages of the metastatic cascade. We first discuss the physical role of the endothelium during tumor cell extravasation and invasion and how contractility of endothelial and tumor cells contributes to the ability of tumor cells to exit the vasculature. Next, we examine how matrix dimensionality and stiffness coregulate tumor cell adhesion and migration beyond the vasculature. Finally, we summarize how tumor cells translate and respond to physical cues through mechanotransduction. Because of the critical role of tumor cell mechanotransduction at various stages of the metastatic cascade, targeting signaling pathways involved in tumor cell mechanosensing of physical stimuli may prove to be an effective therapeutic strategy for cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly M Stroka
- Johns Hopkins Institute for NanoBioTechnology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | |
Collapse
|
103
|
Mehla K, Singh PK. MUC1: a novel metabolic master regulator. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2014; 1845:126-35. [PMID: 24418575 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2014.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2013] [Revised: 12/28/2013] [Accepted: 01/03/2014] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
MUC1, a type I transmembrane protein, is significantly overexpressed and aberrantly glycosylated in tumors of epithelial origin. By virtue of its aberrant signaling due to loss of apical-basal polarity in cancer, MUC1 regulates the metabolite flux at multiple levels. Serving as a transcriptional co-activator, MUC1 directly regulates expression of metabolic genes. By regulating receptor tyrosine kinase signaling, MUC1 facilitates production of biosynthetic intermediates required for cell growth. Also, via direct interactions, MUC1 modulates the activity/stability of enzymes and transcription factors that directly regulate metabolic functions. Additionally, by modulation of autophagy, levels of reactive oxygen species, and metabolite flux, MUC1 facilitates cancer cell survival under hypoxic and nutrient-deprived conditions. This article provides a comprehensive review of recent literature on novel metabolic functions of MUC1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamiya Mehla
- The Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA
| | - Pankaj K Singh
- The Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA; Department of Genetic Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA; Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA
| |
Collapse
|