Passage of erythropoietic agents across the blood-brain barrier: a comparison of human and murine erythropoietin and the analog darbepoetin alfa

Darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp®) improves recognition memory in adult rats that have sustained bilateral ventral hippocampal lesions as neonates or young adults

Recognition memory was assessed in adult rats that received bilateral injections of saline (sham lesions) or ibotenic acid (lesioned) in the ventral hippocampus as neonates (postnatal day 7, PD7) or young adult (42 days of age, PD42) using the Novel Object Recognition Test (NORT). Normal or sham-lesioned rats were able to distinguish novel from familiar objects over a 0.5 and 2 h delay between the sample and choice phases. Adult rats (PD70) lesioned as neonates performed progressively worse than sham-lesioned animals at delays of 0.5 and 2 h. A single injection of darbepoetin alfa (500 or 5000 U/kg, i.p.), given 1 h before the sample phase restored performance 0.5 or 2 h later in the choice phase to same levels as sham-lesioned rats. Adults lesioned on PD42 displayed deficits in NORT performance with a 2 h delay between the choice and sample phases that were completely reversed by administration of darbepoetin alfa (5000 U/kg, i.p.) 1 h before the sample phase. These results suggest that darbepoetin alfa may have utility in treating memory deficits associated with brain dysfunction related to developmental disorders such as schizophrenia.

The CNS as a target for peptides and peptide-based drugs

Peptides hold great potential as CNS drugs, but their delivery to the CNS is problematic. However, actual roadblocks to peptide delivery are different from those often perceived. Many peptides cross the blood-brain barrier by saturable and non-saturable mechanisms, and accumulate in brain in amounts sufficient to produce physiological effects. Peripheral factors (e.g., short half-life in blood) can be dominant factors limiting therapeutic use. Production of therapeutics that are enzymatically resistant and have long circulation times, even when the blood-brain barrier penetration is low, can result in substances with significant CNS accumulation. Surprisingly low amounts of peptide in brain can result in CNS effects, and so the dose needed for brain delivery is generally much smaller than for peripheral tissues. Brain-to-blood transporters can greatly limit CNS accumulation of a potential therapeutic. Finally, intranasal and intrathecal routes may be especially useful for substances that are rapidly degraded in blood or are large and hydrophobic, respectively.

Methods to assess drug permeability across the blood-brain barrier

Much research has focussed on the development of novel therapeutic agents to target various central nervous system disorders, however less attention has been given to determining the potential of such agents to permeate the blood-brain barrier (BBB), a factor that will ultimately govern the effectiveness of these agents in man. In order to assess the potential for novel compounds to permeate the BBB, various in-vitro, in-vivo and in-silico methods may be employed. Although in-vitro models (such as primary cell culture and immortalized cell lines) are useful as a screening method and can appropriately rank compounds in order of BBB permeability, they often correlate poorly to in-vivo brain uptake due to down-regulation of some BBB-specific transporters. In-vivo models (such as the internal carotid artery single injection or perfusion, intravenous bolus injection, brain efflux index and intracerebral microdialysis) provide more accurate information regarding brain uptake, and these can be complemented with novel imaging techniques (such as magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography), although such methods are not suited to high-throughput permeability assessment. This paper reviews current methods used for assessing BBB permeability and highlights the particular advantages and disadvantages associated with each method, with a particular focus on methods suitable for moderate- to high-throughput screening.

Palliative care in patients with brain metastases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With improvements in systemic therapy, central nervous system metastases have increased in incidence in patients with cancer. Patients with brain metastases from solid tumors often have a dismal prognosis, and supportive measures are often critical in improving patient outcome. They include treatments against vasogenic edema, seizures, symptomatic venous thrombosis, and pain, and the management of iatrogenic side effects. This article reviews all the supportive care measures in patients with brain metastases, with the exception of tumor-specific chemotherapy treatments that are also used in this patient population.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recently, improvement has been made in the management of the following complications of brain metastases: epilepsy and antiepileptic drug side effects, thromboembolic complications, fatigue and cognitive disorder of mixed (tumoral and/or iatrogenic) origin, pain, hematological side effects of chemotherapy, and steroids complications.

SUMMARY

Patients with brain metastases are particularly prone to develop severe side effects, increased fatigue, and cognitive deteriorations following apparently minor changes in symptomatic treatments. Palliative management of brain metastasis requires a multidisciplinary approach, and it is important to avoid any treatment that is useless or harmful or has a poor toxicity/efficacy ratio.

Emerging biological roles for erythropoietin in the nervous system

Erythropoietin mediates an evolutionarily conserved, ancient immune response that limits damage to the heart, the nervous system and other tissues following injury. New evidence indicates that erythropoietin specifically prevents the destruction of viable tissue surrounding the site of an injury by signalling through a non-haematopoietic receptor. Engineered derivatives of erythropoietin that have a high affinity for this receptor have been developed, and these show robust tissue-protective effects in diverse preclinical models without stimulating erythropoiesis. A recent successful proof-of-concept clinical trial that used erythropoietin to treat human patients who had suffered a stroke encourages the evaluation of both this cytokine and non-erythropoietic derivatives as therapeutic agents to limit tissue injury.