101
|
Focal laser ablation of prostate cancer: definition, needs, and future. Adv Urol 2012; 2012:589160. [PMID: 22666240 PMCID: PMC3362007 DOI: 10.1155/2012/589160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2012] [Revised: 03/13/2012] [Accepted: 03/14/2012] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Current challenges and innovations in prostate cancer management concern the development of focal therapies that allow the treatment of only the cancer areas sparing the rest of the gland to minimize the potential morbidity. Among these techniques, focal laser ablation (FLA) appears as a potential candidate to reach the goal of focusing energy delivery on the identified targets. The aim of this study is to perform an up-to-date review of this new therapeutic modality. Relevant literature was identified using MEDLINE database with no language restrictions (entries: focal therapy, laser interstitial thermotherapy, prostate cancer, FLA) and by cross-referencing from previously identified studies. Precision, real-time monitoring, MRI compatibility, and low cost of integrated system are principal advantages of FLA. Feasibility and safety of this technique have been reported in phase I assays. FLA might eventually prove to be a middle ground between active surveillance and radical treatment. In conclusion, FLA may have found a role in the management of prostate cancer. However, further trials are required to demonstrate the oncologic effectiveness in the long term.
Collapse
|
102
|
Focal therapy, differential therapy, and radiation treatment for prostate cancer. Adv Urol 2012; 2012:573193. [PMID: 22666239 PMCID: PMC3362011 DOI: 10.1155/2012/573193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2012] [Accepted: 03/14/2012] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Focal and differential therapy represent an approach to improve the therapeutic ratio of prostate cancer treatments. This concept is a shift from treating the whole gland to intensely treating the portion of the gland that contains significant tumor. However, there are many challenges in the move towards focal approaches. Defining which patients are suitable candidates for focal therapy approaches is an area of significant controversy, and it is likely that additional data from imaging or detailed biopsy methods is needed in addition to traditional risk factors. A number of methods have been suggested, and imaging with multiparametric MRI and transperineal template mapping biopsy have shown promise. The approach of differential therapy where the entire prostate is treated to a lower intensity and the tumor areas to high intensity is also discussed in detail. Radiation therapy is a well suited modality for the delivery of differential therapy. Data in the literature using external beam radiation, high dose rate brachytherapy, and low-dose rate brachytherapy for differential therapy are reviewed. Preliminary results are encouraging, and larger studies and randomized controlled trials are needed to validate this approach.
Collapse
|
103
|
Kosoglu MA, Hood RL, Rossmeisl JH, Grant DC, Xu Y, Robertson JL, Rylander MN, Rylander CG. Fiberoptic microneedles: novel optical diffusers for interstitial delivery of therapeutic light. Lasers Surg Med 2012; 43:914-20. [PMID: 22006734 DOI: 10.1002/lsm.21129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Photothermal therapies have limited efficacy and application due to the poor penetration depth of light inside tissue. In earlier work, we described the development of novel fiberoptic microneedles to provide a means to mechanically penetrate dermal tissue and deliver light directly into a localized target area.This paper presents an alternate fiberoptic microneedle design with the capability of delivering more diffuse, but therapeutically useful photothermal energy. Laser lipolysis is envisioned as a future clinical application for this design. MATERIALS AND METHODS A novel fiberoptic microneedle was developed using hydrofluoric acid etching of optical fiber to permit diffuse optical delivery. Microneedles etched for 10, 30, and 50 minutes, and an optical fiber control were compared with three techniques. First, red light delivery from the microneedles was evaluated by imaging the reflectance of the light from a white paper.Second, spatial temperature distribution of the paper in response to near-IR light (1,064 nm, 1 W CW) was recorded using infrared thermography. Third, ex vivo adipose tissue response during 1,064 nm, (5 W CW)irradiation was recorded with bright field microscopy. RESULTS Acid etching exposed a 3 mm length of the fiber core, allowing circumferential delivery of light along this length. Increasing etching time decreased microneedle diameter, resulting in increased uniformity of red and 1,064 nm light delivery along the microneedle axis. For equivalent total energy delivery, thinner microneedles reduced carbonization in the adipose tissue experiments. CONCLUSIONS We developed novel microscale optical diffusers that provided a more homogeneous light distribution from their surfaces, and compared performance to a flat-cleaved fiber, a device currently utilized in clinical practice. These fiberoptic microneedles can potentially enhance clinical laser procedures by providing direct delivery of diffuse light to target chromophores, while minimizing undesirable photothermal damage in adjacent, non-target tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet A Kosoglu
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
104
|
Schouten MG, Bomers JGR, Yakar D, Huisman H, Rothgang E, Bosboom D, Scheenen TWJ, Misra S, Fütterer JJ. Evaluation of a robotic technique for transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsies. Eur Radiol 2012; 22:476-83. [PMID: 21956697 PMCID: PMC3249030 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2259-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2011] [Accepted: 07/08/2011] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the accuracy and speed of a novel robotic technique as an aid to perform magnetic resonance image (MRI)-guided prostate biopsies on patients with cancer suspicious regions. METHODS A pneumatic controlled MR-compatible manipulator with 5 degrees of freedom was developed in-house to guide biopsies under real-time imaging. From 13 consecutive biopsy procedures, the targeting error, biopsy error and target displacement were calculated to evaluate the accuracy. The time was recorded to evaluate manipulation and procedure time. RESULTS The robotic and manual techniques demonstrated comparable results regarding mean targeting error (5.7 vs 5.8 mm, respectively) and mean target displacement (6.6 vs 6.0 mm, respectively). The mean biopsy error was larger (6.5 vs 4.4 mm) when using the robotic technique, although not significant. Mean procedure and manipulation time were 76 min and 6 min, respectively using the robotic technique and 61 and 8 min with the manual technique. CONCLUSIONS Although comparable results regarding accuracy and speed were found, the extended technical effort of the robotic technique make the manual technique - currently - more suitable to perform MRI-guided biopsies. Furthermore, this study provided a better insight in displacement of the target during in vivo biopsy procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martijn G Schouten
- Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
105
|
|
106
|
Kosoglu MA, Hood RL, Rossmeisl JH, Grant DC, Xu Y, Robertson JL, Rylander MN, Rylander CG. Erratum: Fiberoptic microneedles: Novel optical diffusers for interstitial delivery of therapeutic light. Lasers Surg Med 2011. [DOI: 10.1002/lsm.21163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
107
|
Gravas S, Tzortzis V, de la Riva SIM, Laguna P, de la Rosette J. Focal therapy for prostate cancer: patient selection and evaluation. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2011; 12:77-86. [PMID: 22149434 DOI: 10.1586/era.11.144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Recent stage migration toward low-risk prostate cancer, overtreatment of biologically insignificant tumors with radical prostatectomy at the additional expense of a non-negligible morbidity and undertreatment of patients improperly selected for active surveillance are the main reasons that have fueled the concept of focal therapy. Optimal selection of patients is the key for the successful implementation of focal therapy. Selection criteria for focal therapy vary widely and depend on clinical, histological and imaging characteristics of the patients that are highlighted in this article. In addition, the rationales, merits and limitations of the available methods for the assessment of potential candidates, the evaluation of treatment efficacy and follow-up of these patients are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stavros Gravas
- Department of Urology, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
108
|
Ahmed HU, Akin O, Coleman JA, Crane S, Emberton M, Goldenberg L, Hricak H, Kattan MW, Kurhanewicz J, Moore CM, Parker C, Polascik TJ, Scardino P, van As N, Villers A. Transatlantic Consensus Group on active surveillance and focal therapy for prostate cancer. BJU Int 2011; 109:1636-47. [PMID: 22077593 DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2011.10633.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Active surveillance for prostate cancer is gaining increasing acceptance for low risk prostate cancer. Focal therapy is an emerging tissue preservation strategy that aims for treat only areas of cancer. Early phase trials have shown that side-effects can be significantly reduced using focal therapy. There is significant uncertainty in both active surveillance and focal therapy. This consensus group paper provides a road-map for clinical practice and research for both tissue-preserving strategies in the areas of patient population, tools for risk stratification and cancer localisation, treatment interventions as well as comparators and outcome measures in future comparative trials. OBJECTIVE To reach consensus on key issues for clinical practice and future research in active surveillance and focal therapy in managing localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS A group of expert urologists, oncologists, radiologists, pathologists and computer scientists from North America and Europe met to discuss issues in patient population, interventions, comparators and outcome measures to use in both tissue-preserving strategies of active surveillance and focal therapy. Break-out sessions were formed to provide agreement or highlight areas of disagreement on individual topics which were then collated by a writing group into statements that formed the basis of this report and agreed upon by the whole Transatlantic Consensus Group. RESULTS The Transatlantic group propose that emerging diagnostic tools such as precision imaging and transperineal prostate mapping biopsy can improve prostate cancer care. These tools should be integrated into prostate cancer management and research so that better risk stratification and more effective treatment allocation can be applied. The group envisaged a process of care in which active surveillance, focal therapy, and radical treatments lie on a continuum of complementary therapies for men with a range of disease grades and burdens, rather than being applied in the mutually exclusive and competitive way they are now. CONCLUSION The changing landscape of prostate cancer epidemiology requires the medical community to re-evaluate the entire prostate cancer diagnostic and treatment pathway in order to minimize harms resulting from over-diagnosis and over-treatment. Precise risk stratification at every point in this pathway is required alongside paradigm shifts in our thinking about what constitutes cancer in the prostate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hashim U Ahmed
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
109
|
Da Rosa MR, Trachtenberg J, Chopra R, Haider MA. Early experience in MRI-guided therapies of prostate cancer: HIFU, laser and photodynamic treatment. Cancer Imaging 2011; 11 Spec No A:S3-8. [PMID: 22187023 PMCID: PMC3266567 DOI: 10.1102/1470-7330.2011.9003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer screening has resulted in earlier diagnosis with lower-grade disease, leading to over-detection and over-treatment in a significant number of patients. Current whole-gland radical treatments are associated with significant rates of morbidity. The high prevalence of low-risk disease together with an inability to accurately identify those men harboring more aggressive cancers has led to tremendous research in low-morbidity focal therapies for prostate cancer. This review summarizes the early experiences with focal therapy with emphasis on early applications of laser, high-intensity focuses ultrasound, and photodynamic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M R Da Rosa
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
110
|
Colin P, Nevoux P, Marqa M, Auger F, Leroy X, Villers A, Puech P, Mordon S, Betrouni N. Focal laser interstitial thermotherapy (LITT) at 980 nm for prostate cancer: treatment feasibility in Dunning R3327-AT2 rat prostate tumour. BJU Int 2011; 109:452-8. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2011.10406.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
111
|
Reply by Authors. J Urol 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.04.116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
112
|
Oto A. Invited commentary. Radiographics 2011; 31:704-6; discussion 706. [PMID: 21721198 DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.31.3.105223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Aytekin Oto
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
113
|
Marqa MF, Colin P, Nevoux P, Mordon SR, Betrouni N. Focal laser ablation of prostate cancer: numerical simulation of temperature and damage distribution. Biomed Eng Online 2011; 10:45. [PMID: 21635775 PMCID: PMC3117748 DOI: 10.1186/1475-925x-10-45] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2011] [Accepted: 06/02/2011] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The use of minimally invasive ablative techniques in the management of patients with low grade and localized prostate tumours could represent a treatment option between active surveillance and radical therapy. Focal laser ablation (FLA) could be one of these treatment modalities. Dosimetry planning and conformation of the treated area to the tumor remain major issues, especially when, several fibers are required. An effective method to perform pre-treatment planning of this therapy is computer simulation. In this study we present an in vivo validation of a mathematical model. Methods The simulation model is based on finite elements method (FEM) to solve the bio-heat and the thermal damage equations. Laser irradiation was performed with a 980 nm laser diode system (5 W, 75 s). Light was transmitted using a cylindrical diffusing fiber inserted inside a preclinical animal prostate cancer model induced in Copenhagen rats. Non-enhanced T2-weighted and dynamic gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging examinations were performed at baseline and 48 hours after the procedure. The model was validated by comparing the simulated necrosis volume to the results obtained in vivo on (MRI) and by histological analysis. 3 iso-damage temperatures were considered 43° C, 45° C and 50° C. Results The mean volume of the tissue necrosis, estimated from the histological analyses was 0.974 ± 0.059 cc and 0.98 ± 0.052 cc on the 48 h MR images. For the simulation model, volumes were: 1.38 cc when T = 43° C, 1.1 cc for T = 45°C and 0.99 cc when T = 50 C°. Conclusions In this study, a clear correlation was established between simulation and in vivo experiments of FLA for prostate cancer. Simulation is a promising planning technique for this therapy. It needs further more evaluation to allow to FLA to become a widely applied surgical method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamad-Feras Marqa
- Inserm (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research), U703, 152 rue du Docteur Yersin, 59120 Loos, France
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
114
|
Lindner U, Lawrentschuk N, Schatloff O, Trachtenberg J, Lindner A. Evolution from active surveillance to focal therapy in the management of prostate cancer. Future Oncol 2011; 7:775-87. [DOI: 10.2217/fon.11.51] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Organ-preserving therapies are widely accepted in many facets of medicine and, more recently, in oncology. For example, partial nephrectomy is now accepted as a preferred alternative over radical nephrectomy for small (up to 4 cm or T1) tumors. Focal therapy (FT) is another organ-preserving strategy applying energy (cryotherapy, laser ablation and/or high-intensity focused ultrasound) to destroy tumors while leaving the majority of the organ, surrounding tissue and structures unscathed and functional. Owing to the perceived multifocality of prostate cancer (PCa) technology limitations, in the past PCa was not considered suitable for FT. However, with the rise of active surveillance for the management of low-risk PCa in carefully selected patients, FT is emerging as an alternative. This is owing to technology improvements in imaging and energy-delivery systems to ablate tissue, as well as the realization that many men and clinicians still desire tumor control. With the postulated ability to ablate tumors with minimal morbidity, FT may have found a role in the management of PCa; the aim of FT a being long-term cancer control without the morbidity associated with radical therapies. Data for FT in PCa have been derived from case series and small Phase I trials, with larger cohort studies with longer follow-up having only just commenced. More data from large trials on the safety and efficacy of FT are required before this approach can be recommended in men with PCa. Importantly, studies must confirm that no viable cancer cells remain in the region of ablation. FT might eventually prove to be a ‘middle ground’ between active surveillance and radical treatment, combining minimal morbidity with cancer control and the potential for retreatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uri Lindner
- Department of Urology, Tel Hashomer Hospital (affiliated with Tel Aviv University), 52621, Israel
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, Urology Unit & Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia
| | - Oscar Schatloff
- Department of Urology, Assaf Harofe Medical Center (affiliated with Tel Aviv University), Zerifin 70300, Israel
| | - John Trachtenberg
- Department of Urology & Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, 610 University Ave., Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
| | - Arie Lindner
- Department of Urology, Assaf Harofe Medical Center (affiliated with Tel Aviv University), Zerifin 70300, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
115
|
Pros and cons of focal therapy for localised prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer 2011; 2011:584784. [PMID: 22110990 PMCID: PMC3200263 DOI: 10.1155/2011/584784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2010] [Revised: 02/13/2011] [Accepted: 03/09/2011] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In prostate cancer, an interesting and intriguing option to overcome the risks of whole-gland treatment is focal therapy, with the aim of eradicating known cancer foci and reducing collateral damages to the structures essential for maintaining normal urinary and sexual function. Ablation of all known lesions would favorably alter the natural history of the cancer without impacting health-related quality of life and allows for safe retreatment with repeated focal therapy or whole-gland approaches if necessary. Our objective is to reassess the possibilities and criticisms of such procedure: the rationale for focal therapy and the enthusiasm come from the success of conservative approaches in treating other malignancies and in the high incidence of overtreatment introduced by prostate cancer screening programs. One of the challenges in applying such an approach to the treatment of prostate cancer is the multifocal nature of the disease and current difficulties in accurate tumor mapmaking.
Collapse
|
116
|
Sooriakumaran P, Grover S, Tewari A. The success of focal therapy hinges on the success of imaging platforms. BJU Int 2011; 107:1344-6. [PMID: 21518227 DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2011.10226.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Prasanna Sooriakumaran
- Lefrak Center of Robotic Surgery and Prostate Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
117
|
Yakar D, Schouten MG, Bosboom DGH, Barentsz JO, Scheenen TWJ, Fütterer JJ. Feasibility of a pneumatically actuated MR-compatible robot for transrectal prostate biopsy guidance. Radiology 2011; 260:241-7. [PMID: 21406625 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11101106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the feasibility of using a remote-controlled, pneumatically actuated magnetic resonance (MR)-compatible robotic device to aid transrectal biopsy of the prostate performed with real-time 3-T MR imaging guidance. MATERIALS AND METHODS This prospective study was approved by the ethics review board, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Twelve consecutive men who were clinically suspected of having prostate cancer and had a history of at least one transrectal ultrasonography (US)-guided prostate biopsy with negative results underwent diagnostic multiparametric MR imaging of the prostate. Two radiologists in consensus identified cancer-suspicious regions (CSRs) in 10 patients. These regions were subsequently targeted with the robot for MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy. To direct the needle guide toward the CSRs, the MR-compatible robotic device was remote controlled at the MR console by means of a controller and a graphical user interface for real-time MR imaging guidance of the needle guide. The ability to reach the CSRs with the robot for biopsy was analyzed. RESULTS A total of 17 CSRs were detected in 10 patients at the diagnostic MR examinations. These regions were targeted for MR imaging-guided robot-assisted prostate biopsy. Thirteen (76%) of the 17 CSRs could be reached with the robot for biopsy. Biopsy of the remaining four CSRs was performed without use of the robot. CONCLUSION It is feasible to perform transrectal prostate biopsy with real-time 3-T MR imaging guidance with the aid of a remote-controlled, pneumatically actuated MR-compatible robotic device.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derya Yakar
- Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
118
|
Lawrentschuk N, Finelli A, Van der Kwast T, Ryan P, Bolton D, Fleshner N, Trachtenberg J, Klotz L, Robinette M, Woo H. Salvage Radical Prostatectomy Following Primary High Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Treatment of Prostate Cancer. J Urol 2011; 185:862-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.10.080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2010] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- N. Lawrentschuk
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Urology Unit, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - A. Finelli
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - T.H. Van der Kwast
- Department of Pathology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - P. Ryan
- Department of Pathology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - D.M. Bolton
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Urology Unit, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - N.E. Fleshner
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - J. Trachtenberg
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - L. Klotz
- Department of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - M. Robinette
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - H. Woo
- Discipline of Surgery, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney and Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
119
|
Lindner U, Lawrentschuk N, Trachtenberg J. Image guidance for focal therapy of prostate cancer. World J Urol 2010; 28:727-34. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-010-0604-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2010] [Accepted: 09/29/2010] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
|
120
|
Abstract
Focal therapy is emerging as an alternative to active surveillance for the management of low-risk prostate cancer in carefully selected patients. The aim of focal therapy is long-term cancer control without the associated morbidity that plagues all radical therapies. Different energy modalities have been used to focally ablate cancer tissue, and available techniques include cryotherapy, laser ablation, high-intensity focused ultrasound and photodynamic therapy. The majority of evidence for focal therapy has come from case series and small phase I trials, and larger cohort studies with longer follow-up are only now being commenced. More data from large trials on the safety and efficacy of focal therapy are therefore required before this approach can be recommended in men with prostate cancer; in particular, studies must confirm that no viable cells remain in the region of ablation. Focal therapy might eventually prove to be a 'middle ground' between active surveillance and radical treatment, combining minimal morbidity with cancer control and the potential for re-treatment.
Collapse
|