Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile-duct stones

Endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation following limited sphincterotomy for the removal of refractory bile duct stones: experience of 169 cases in a single Chinese center

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation (EPLBD) combined with limited endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) for the removal of large biliary duct stones (≥10 mm).

METHODS

Data of patients who underwent an attempted removal of large bile duct stones by limited EST followed by EPLBD (≥12 mm in diameter) from April 2006 to October 2011 in our center were reviewed. Clinical characteristics, endoscopic methods and outcomes of the patients were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 169 patients with a mean age of 69.3 years (range 19-97 years) underwent 171 procedures. Median stone size and balloon diameter was 15 mm and 13 mm, respectively. Complete stone removal in a single session was achieved in 163 procedures (95.3%) with mechanical lithotripsy (ML) used in 66 (38.6%). Patients with a larger stone size required more frequent use of ML with a comparable success rate (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences between patients with and without periampullary diverticula in stone clearance (97.3% vs 93.8%), ML requirement (36.5% vs 40.2%) and complications (2.7% vs 6.2%) (all P > 0.05). Seven patients had eight procedure-related complications including moderate or mild bleeding (n = 4), minor perforation (n = 1), mild pancreatitis (n = 2) and cholangitis (n = 1).

CONCLUSION

EPLBD following limited EST is an effective and safe approach for the removal of large biliary duct stones, especially for those refractory cases.

Randomized trial of endoscopic sphincterotomy with balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy alone for removal of bile duct stones

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Limited endoscopic sphincterotomy with large balloon dilation (ESBD) is an alternative to endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) for removing bile duct stones, but it is not clear which procedure is most effective. We compared the 2 techniques in removal of bile duct stones.

METHODS

Between September 2005 and September 2011, 156 consecutive patients with suspected of having, or known to have, common bile duct stones were randomly assigned to groups that underwent ES or ESBD. Patients in the ESBD group underwent limited sphincterotomy (up to half of the sphincter) followed by balloon dilation to the size of the common bile duct or 15 mm, and patients in the ES group underwent complete sphincterotomy alone. Stones were then removed using standard techniques. The primary outcome was percentage of stones cleared, and secondary outcomes included procedural time, method of stone extraction, number of procedures required for stone clearance, morbidities and mortality within 30 days, and direct cost.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between groups in percentage of stones cleared (ES vs ESBD: 88.5% vs 89.0%). More patients in the ES group (46.2%) than the ESBD group (28.8%) required mechanical lithotripsy (P = .028), particularly for stones ≥15 mm (90.9% vs 58.1%; P = .002). Morbidities developed in 10.3% of patients in the ES group and 6.8% of patients in the ESBD group (P = .46). The cost of the hospitalization was also significantly lower in the ESBD group (P = .034).

CONCLUSIONS

ESBD and ES clear bile stones with equal efficacy. However, ESBD reduces the need for mechanical lithotripsy and is less expensive; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00164853.

Large-balloon dilation of the sphincter of Oddi after sphincterotomy or infundibulotomy to extract large calculi or multiple common bile duct stones without using mechanical lithotripsy

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilatation (ESLBD) has an efficacy equal to or higher than that of endoscopic sphincterotomy alone for biliary lithiasis extractions. Our purpose was to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy and morbidity of large-balloon dilatation of the sphincter of Oddi after sphincterotomy or infundibulotomy for large or multiple common bile duct stones.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 64 ESLBD procedures were performed in 62 patients: 57 after sphincterotomy and 7 after infundibulotomy. The feasibility was 100%, and full clearance of the common bile duct was achieved in a single session without using mechanical lithotripsy in 95.3% of cases. Short-term complications were observed in 9 patients (14%). There were no perforations. The most frequent complication was delayed bleeding (7.8%). There was no significant difference of overall complications after sphincterotomy or after infundibulotomy (12.3% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.25). The incidence of acute pancreatitis was significantly higher after infundibulotomy than after sphincterotomy (28.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

ESLBD after endoscopic sphincterotomy or infundibulotomy is a simple, reproducible and effective technique, associated with a low morbidity rate and helps in avoiding mechanical lithotripsy in 95.3% of cases for the endoscopic extraction of large or multiple common bile duct stones.

Endoscopic large-balloon dilation alone versus endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilation for the treatment of large bile duct stones

Background

Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) combined with large-balloon dilation (LBD) has been proposed as an alternative to manage large bile duct stones. However, recent reports indicate that LBD without EST may be safe and effective in this setting.

Methods

One hundred thirty-one patients with large common bile duct (CBD) stones 12 mm in size or larger underwent LBD alone (n = 62) or EST plus LBD (n = 69) for lithotripsy. The therapeutic outcome and complications were reviewed and compared.

Results

There were no differences between the two groups with regard to age, size and number of stones, or bile duct diameter. The LBD alone group (mean age, 70.4 years) and the EST plus LBD group (mean age, 68.2 years) had similar outcomes in terms of overall successful stone removal (96.8% vs. 95.7%, P = 0.738) and complete stone removal without the need for mechanical lithotripsy (80.6% vs. 73.9%, P = 0.360). Complications in the LBD alone and EST plus LBD groups were as follows: pancreatitis (6.5% vs. 4.3%, P = 0.593), impaction of basket and stone (0% vs. 1.4%, P = 0.341), and perforation (0% vs. 1.4%, P = 0.341).

Conclusions

LBD alone may be a simple, safe, and effective alternative to EST plus LBD in relatively aged patients with large CBD stones, and it can simplify the procedure compared with EST plus LBD.

Endoscopic management of difficult common bile duct stones

Endoscopy is widely accepted as the first treatment option in the management of bile duct stones. In this review we focus on the alternative endoscopic modalities for the management of difficult common bile duct stones. Most biliary stones can be removed with an extraction balloon, extraction basket or mechanical lithotripsy after endoscopic sphincterotomy. Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation with or without endoscopic sphincterotomy or mechanical lithotripsy has been shown to be effective for management of difficult to remove bile duct stones in selected patients. Ductal clearance can be safely achieved with peroral cholangioscopy guided laser or electrohydraulic lithotripsy in most cases where other endoscopic treatment modalities have failed. Biliary stenting may be an alternative treatment option for frail and elderly patients or those with serious co morbidities.

Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation: guidelines for pursuing zero mortality

Since endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) is used to treat benign disease and as a substitute for conventional methods, such as endoscopic sphincterotomy plus endoscopic mechanical lithotripsy, we should aim for zero mortality. This review defines EPLBD and suggests guidelines for its use based on a review of published articles and our large-scale multicenter retrospective review.

Comparison of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for retrieval of choledocholithiasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is the most frequently used technique for removal of stones from the bile duct. In recent years, endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) has been shown to be a safe and effective technique for the removal of large or difficult common bile duct stones. However, comparison of EPLBD and EST for effectiveness in bile duct stone removal has given inconsistent results. The present meta-analysis was carried out to compare the effect of EPLBD and EST in retrieval of choledocholithiasis.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using Medline, PubMed, EMBase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for relevant articles published in English. A meta-analysis was performed on the retrieved studies.

RESULTS

Seven randomized controlled trials and 790 patients were involved. EPLBD compared with EST resulted in similar outcomes for overall successful clearance rates of bile duct stones (97.35 vs. 96.35%, OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.58-2.82, P = 0.54), stone clearance in the first ERCP session (87.87 vs. 84.15%, OR 1.31, 95% CI 0.81-2.11, P = 0.21) and removal of large sized stones (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.21-5.64, P = 0.49). EPLBD performed with either a short or a long ballooning time did not increase the bile duct stone clearance rate. EPLBD decreased overall usage of mechanical lithotripsy in the bile duct stone removal process (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.30-0.86, P = 0.01). However, no significant difference was found between EPLBD and EST in the use of mechanical lithotripsy for the removal of large sized stones (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.34-1.28, P = 0.22). Compared with EST, EPLBD did not show a short ERCP duration (WMD -0.75, 95% CI -1.57 to 0.08, P = 0.08). EPLBD was associated with fewer overall complications than EST (5.8 vs. 13.1%, OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24-0.68, P = 0.0007). Hemorrhage occurred less frequently with EPLBD than with EST (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.04-0.50, P = 0.002). There was no significant difference in post-ERCP pancreatitis, perforation and cholangitis.

CONCLUSIONS

EPLBD is an effective and safe method for the removal of large or difficult common bile stones. EPLBD should be considered as an alternative to EST for patients in whom EST could not be routinely performed. Based on EPLBD causing fewer cases of hemorrhaging, EPLBD is also recommended for removal of large or difficult common bile duct stones in patients with an underlying coagulopathy or need for anticoagulation following ERCP. The long-term prognosis of EPLBD need to be further investigated.

Endoscopic extraction of large common bile duct stones: A review article

Since therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography replaced surgery as the first approach in cases of choledocolithiasis, a plethora of endoscopic techniques and devices appeared in order to facilitate rapid, safe and effective bile duct stones extraction. Nowadays, endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with balloon catheters and/or baskets is the routine endoscopic technique for stone extraction in the great majority of patients. Large common bile duct stones are treated conventionally with mechanical lithotripsy, while the most serious complication of the procedure is “basket and stone impaction” that is predominately resolved surgically. In cases of difficult, impacted, multiple or intrahepatic stones, more sophisticated procedures have been used. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy and laser lithotripsy are performed using conventional mother-baby scope systems, ultra-thin cholangioscopes, thin endoscopes and ultimately using the novel single use, single operator SpyGlass Direct Visualization System, in order to deliver intracorporeal shock wave energy to fragment the targeted stone, with very good outcomes. Recently, large balloon dilation after endoscopic sphincterotomy confirmed its effectiveness in the extraction of large stones in a plethora of trials. When compared with mechanical lithotripsy or with balloon dilation alone, it proved to be superior. Moreover, dilation is an ideal alternative in cases of altered anatomy where access to the papilla is problematic. Endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by large balloon dilation represents the onset of a new era in large bile duct stone extraction and the management of “impaction” because it seems that is an effective, inexpensive, less traumatic, safe and easy method that does not require sophisticated apparatus and can be performed widely by skillful endoscopists. When complete extraction of large stones is unsuccessful, the drainage of the common bile duct is mandatory either for bridging to the final therapy or as a curative therapy for very elderly patients with short life expectancy. Placing of more than one plastic endoprostheses is better while the administration of Ursodiol is ineffective. The great majority of patients with large stones can be treated endoscopically. In cases of unsuccessful stone extraction using balloons, baskets, mechanical lithotripsy, electrohydraulic or laser lithotripsy and large balloon dilation, the patient should be referred for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy or a percutaneous approach and finally surgery.

Endoscopic complications--avoidance and management

The frequency of endoscopic complications is likely to rise owing to the increased number of indications for therapeutic procedures and also to the increased complexity of endoscopic techniques. Informed patient consent should be obtained as part of the procedure. Prevention of endoscopic adverse events is based on knowledge of the relevant risk factors and their mechanisms of occurrence. Thus, suitable training of future gastroenterologists and endoscopists is required for these complex procedures. When facing a complication, appropriate management is generally provided by an early diagnosis followed by prompt therapeutic care tailored to the situation. The most common complications of diagnostic and therapeutic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, retrograde cholangiopancreatography, small bowel endoscopy and colonoscopy are reviewed here. Different modalities of medical, endoscopic or surgical management are also considered.

Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation in Billroth II gastrectomy patients with bile duct stones

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Patients with Billroth II (B-II) gastrectomy present technical difficulties during endoscopic stone removal due to altered anatomy. Although endoscopic sphincterotomy alone or endoscopic balloon dilation alone has been used for removal of bile duct stones in patients with B-II gastrectomy, the results are not satisfactory. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) for removal of bile duct stones in patients with B-II gastrectomy.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients (20 men and six women; median age 72 years) with bile duct stones and a history of B-II gastrectomy were enrolled. After cannulation, limited endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed. Then, balloon dilation (balloon size, 10-15 mm) was performed and stones were removed conventionally or via mechanical lithotripsy. Successful stone removal and complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

In all cases, stones were successfully removed. The median number of sessions for complete stone removal was one (range 1-3). Stone removal by mechanical lithotripsy was achieved in three patients (11.5%). There were no significant complications, such as bleeding, pancreatitis, or perforation.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation is an effective and safe method for removal of bile duct stones. We suggest consideration of this technique for removal of bile duct stones in patients with B-II gastrectomy.

Recurrence of bile duct stones after endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation combined with limited sphincterotomy: long-term follow-up study

Background/Aims

Endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation combined with limited endoscopic sphincterotomy (EPLBD+ES) is promising for the treatment of common bile duct (CBD) stones. The aim of this study was to clarify the recurrence rate and the risk factors for CBD stones after EPLBD+ES.

Methods

In total, 100 patients who underwent EPLBD+ES from 2006 to 2007 were evaluated retrospectively. One hundred and nine patients who were treated with endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) from 2004 to 2005 were set as the historical control group. Various risk factors for the recurrence of bile duct stones were analyzed.

Results

Of the 209 patients, the duration of follow-up was 32.5±4.5 months in the EPLBD+ES group and 31.8±6.0 months in the ES group. The recurrence rate of CBD stones was 11.0% (11/100) in the EPLBD+ES group and 13.8% (15/109) in the ES group (p=0.546). The cumulative recurrence rate of stones was not significantly different between the EPLBD+ES and ES groups (log rank, p=0.537). Univariate analysis showed that the diameter of the CBD (≥22 mm) was the only predictive variable that could differentiate recurrence from nonrecurrence in the EPLBD+ES group. Multivariate analysis revealed that the diameter of the bile duct was the only risk factor for stone recurrence (p=0.022; odds ratio, 1.175; 95% confidence interval, 1.023 to 1.348).

Conclusions

The recurrence rate of CBD stones after EPLBD+ES is comparable to that of the ES group, and a dilated CBD appears to increase the risk of bile duct stone recurrence.

One-Step Transpapillary Balloon Dilation under Cap-Fitted Endoscopy without a Preceding Sphincterotomy for the Removal of Bile Duct Stones in Billroth II Gastrectomy

Background/Aims

Endoscopic sphincterotomy may be limited in Billroth II gastrectomy because of difficulty in orientating the duodenoscope and sphincterotome as a result of altered anatomy. This study was planned to investigate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic transpapillary large balloon dilation (EPBD) without preceding sphincterotomy for removal of large CBD stones in Billroth II gastrectomy.

Methods

Between March 2010 and February 2011, one-step EPBD under cap-fitted forward-viewing endoscopy was performed in patients who had undergone Billroth II gastrectomy at two tertiary referral centers. Main outcome measurements were successful duct clearance and EPBD-related complications.

Results

Successful access to major duodenal papilla was performed in 13 patients, but successful selective CBD cannulation was achieved in 12 patients (92.3%). Median maximum transverse stone size was 11.5 mm (10 to 14 mm). The mean number of stones was 2 (1-5). The median CBD diameter was 15 mm (12 to 19 mm). Mean procedure time from successful biliary access to complete stone removal was 17.8 min. Complete duct clearance was achieved in all patients. Four patients (33.3%) needed one more session of ERCP for removal of remnant stones. Asymptomatic hyperamylasemia in two patients and minor bleeding in another occurred.

Conclusions

Without preceding sphincterotomy, one-step EPBD (≥10 mm) under cap-fitted forward-viewing endoscopy may be safe and effective for the removal of large stones (≥10 mm) with CBD dilatation in Billroth II gastrectomy.

Current status of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for the treatment of bile duct stones

Background/purpose

While endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is performed worldwide for the removal of common bile duct stones, many biliary endoscopists hesitate to regard endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) as a standard procedure for treatment. Therefore, the aim of this review is to re-evaluate the status of EPBD for the treatment of common bile duct stones.

Results

A major benefit of EPBD is preservation of papillary function, which is not complete but may be greater than that after EST. The disadvantages of EPBD compared with EST are that EPBD is difficult to use for the removal of larger stones because of the smaller biliary opening, it requires more frequent use of mechanical lithotripsy, and it is associated with a higher incidence of pancreatitis, although the risks of bleeding and perforation are low. Since the biliary sphincter is easily dilated with a balloon catheter, EPBD may be effective for patients with anatomic anomalies, such as after gastric bypass surgery or in the presence of a periampullary diverticulum. No standard procedure exists to reduce the risk of acute pancreatitis with EPBD.

Conclusion

EPBD is feasible, however, we must pursue less hazardous techniques of papillary balloon dilation. Furthermore, we must understand the benefits and limitations of EPBD and determine whether it could provide clinical benefits for long-term complications.

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for pancreatic and large common bile duct stones

Extraction of large pancreatic and common bile duct (CBD) calculi has always challenged the therapeutic endoscopist. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) is an excellent tool for patients with large pancreatic and CBD calculi that are not amenable to routine endotherapy. Pancreatic calculi in the head and body are targeted by ESWL, with an aim to fragment them to < 3 mm diameter so that they can be extracted by subsequent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). In our experience, complete clearance of the pancreatic duct was achieved in 76% and partial clearance in 17% of 1006 patients. Short-term pain relief with reduction in the number of analgesics ingested was seen in 84% of these patients. For large CBD calculi, a nasobiliary tube is placed to help target the calculi, as well as bathe the calculi in saline - a simple maneuver which helps to facilitate fragmentation. The aim is to fragment calculi to < 5 mm size and clear the same during ERCP. Complete clearance of the CBD was achieved in 84.4% of and partial clearance in 12.3% of 283 patients. More than 90% of the patients with pancreatic and biliary calculi needed three or fewer sessions of ESWL with 5000 shocks being delivered at each session. The use of epidural anesthesia helped in reducing patient movement. This, together with the better focus achieved with newer third-generation lithotripters, prevents collateral tissue damage and minimizes the complications. Complications in our experience with nearly 1300 patients were minimal, and no extension of hospital stay was required. Similar rates of clearance of pancreatic and biliary calculi with minimal adverse effects have been reported from the centers where ESWL is performed regularly. In view of its high efficiency, non-invasive nature and low complication rates, ESWL can be offered as the first-line therapy for selected patients with large pancreatic and CBD calculi.

Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis

Pancreatitis is the most common complication of ERCP. It can be associated with substantial morbidity. Hence, the minimization of both the incidence and severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis is paramount. Considerable efforts have been made to identify factors that may be associated with an increased risk of this complication. In addition, both procedure- and pharmacological-related interventions have been proposed that may prevent this complication. This paper outlines these interventions and presents the evidence to support their use in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Success rate and complications of endoscopic extraction of common bile duct stones over 2 cm in diameter

BACKGROUND

Clinically, common bile duct (CBD) stones >2 cm are difficult to remove by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). To evaluate this observation, the rates of successful clearance of CBD stones and complications were compared between ERCP extraction of CBD stones of >2 cm and <2 cm in diameter.

METHODS

All patients who had undergone endoscopic extraction of CBD stones at the Endoscopy Center of Shanghai First People's Hospital from May 2004 to May 2008 were reviewed. Patients with CBD stones of >2 cm in diameter were enrolled in the >2 cm group. Two matched controls with CBD stones of <2 cm in diameter were selected for each enrolled patient (<2 cm group). Patient characteristics, success rates, and complications during and after ERCP were compared.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients constituted the >2 cm group and 144 patients were in the <2 cm group. No significant differences were found in the patient characteristics, except for stone size and CBD diameter. Both the overall success rate and the success rate in the first ERCP session were lower in the >2 cm group (77.8% and 58.3%, respectively) than in the <2 cm group (91.7% and 83.3%, P<0.01). During ERCP, the incidence of hypoxemia (30.6%) and hemorrhaging papillae (18.1%) in the >2 cm group was higher than in the <2 cm group (13.2% and 6.3%, P<0.05). After ERCP, the rates of delayed papillae hemorrhage (13.9%), hyperamylasemia (23.6%), acute pancreatitis (8.3%) and biliary infection (18.1%) were higher in the >2 cm group than in the <2 cm group (3.5%, 11.1%, 2.1%, and 2.8%, respectively, P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The success rate of endoscopic extraction of CBD stones of >2 cm in diameter was lower but the complication rate was higher than that of stones of <2 cm in diameter.

Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus endoprostheses in the treatment of large or multiple common bile duct stones

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Little information is available on the outcomes of endoscopic sphincterotomy plus biliary stent placement without stone extraction as primary therapy at initial endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the treatment of large or multiple common bile duct (CBD) stones. The aim of the present study was to study the effect of biliary stents and sphincterotomy as primary therapy for patients with choledocholithiasis.

METHODS

Patients with large (≥20 mm) or multiple (≥3) CBD stones were retrospectively studied. The patients underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy and placement of plastic stents in the bile duct without stone extraction at the initial ERCP. Three or more months later, a second ERCP was carried out and stone removal was attempted. Differences in stone size and the largest CBD diameter before and after stenting were compared. Stone clearance and complications were also evaluated.

RESULTS

52 patients were enrolled. After a median of 124 days of biliary plastic stent placement the mean maximal stone diameter decreased from 16.6 mm to 10.0 mm (P < 0.01). The mean CBD diameter also decreased from 15.3 mm to 11.5 mm (P < 0.01). The total stone clearance at second ERCP was 94.2%, only 5.7% of which needed mechanical lithotripsy.

COMPLICATIONS

pancreatitis in one (1.9%) at initial ERCP, cholangitis in two (3.8%) after 52 days and 84 days of placement of stent. No complications were recorded at second ERCP.

CONCLUSIONS

Biliary plastic stents plus endoscopic sphincterotomy without stone extraction as primary therapy at initial ERCP is a safe and effective method in the management of large or multiple CBD stones.

Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation alone without sphincterotomy for the treatment of large common bile duct stones

BACKGROUND

Lethal pancreatitis has been reported after treatment for common bile duct stones using small endoscopic papillary balloon dilation.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of using large balloon dilation alone without the use of sphincterotomy for the treatment of large common bile duct stones in Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital. Success rate of stone clearance, procedure-related adverse events and incidents, frequency of mechanical lithotripsy use, and recurrent stones were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 247 patients were reviewed in the current study. The mean age of the patients was 71.2 years. Most of them had comorbidities. Mean stone size was 16.4 mm. Among the patients, 132 (53.4%) had an intact gallbladder and 121 (49%) had a juxtapapillary diverticulum. The mean size of dilating balloon used was 13.2 mm. The mean duration of the dilating procedure was 4.7 min. There were 39 (15.8%) patients required the help of mechanical lithotripsy while retrieving the stones. The final success rate of complete retrieval of stones was 92.7%. The rate of pancreatic duct enhancement was 26.7% (66/247). There were 3 (1.2%) adverse events and 6 (2.4%) intra-procedure bleeding incidents. All patients recovered completely after conservative and endoscopic treatment respectively, and no procedure-related mortality was noted. 172 patients had a follow-up duration of more than 6 months and among these, 25 patients had recurrent common bile duct stones. It was significantly correlated to the common bile duct size (p = 0.036)

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation alone is simple, safe, and effective in dealing with large common bile duct stones in relatively aged and debilitated patients.

Can a small endoscopic sphincterotomy plus a large-balloon dilation reduce the use of mechanical lithotripsy in patients with large bile duct stones?

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is technically difficult in the patients with large extrahepaic bile duct stones. Small endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with large-balloon dilation (ESLBD) currently seems to be a promising alternative for patients with difficult bile duct stones that cannot be extracted by EST. This study compared the therapeutic benefits and complication rates of ESLBD with those of EST alone.

METHODS

This study investigated 149 patients treated for stones (≥10 mm) or multiple stones in the extrahepatic bile duct. The ESLBD group (n = 72) was compared with the conventional EST group (n = 77). Mechanical lithotripsy was performed when the stone could not be removed using a Dormia basket.

RESULTS

The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of mean bile duct diameter, common bile duct angulation, and presence of periampullary diverticulum. The ESLBD group compared with the EST-alone group had similar outcomes in terms of overall successful stone removal but showed significant differences in complete stone removal during the first session (87.5 vs. 74.0%; P = 0.036) and the use of mechanical lithotripsy for large bile duct stones (≥15 mm) (17.9 vs. 45.8%; P = 0.026). For the patients with a periampullary diverticulum, ESLBD and EST showed similar results only for efficacy and complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The ESLBD technique may be a safe, effective alternative to conventional EST for endoscopic removal of large common bile duct stones, and it can reduce the use of mechanical lithotripsy compared with EST alone.

Cost-effective treatment of patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis and possible common bile duct stones

BACKGROUND

Clinicians must choose a treatment strategy for patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis without knowing whether common bile duct (CBD) stones are present. The purpose of this study was to determine the most cost-effective treatment strategy for patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis and possible CBD stones.

STUDY DESIGN

Our decision model included 5 treatment strategies: laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) alone followed by expectant management; preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by LC; LC with intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) ± common bile duct exploration (CBDE); LC followed by postoperative ERCP; and LC with IOC ± postoperative ERCP. The rates of successful completion of diagnostic testing and therapeutic intervention, test characteristics (sensitivity and specificity), morbidity, and mortality for all procedures are from current literature. Hospitalization costs and lengths of stay are from the 2006 National Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data. The probability of CBD stones was varied from 0% to 100% and the most cost-effective strategy was determined at each probability.

RESULTS

Across the CBD stone probability range of 4% to 100%, LC with IOC ± ERCP was the most cost-effective. If the probability was 0%, LC alone was the most cost-effective. Our model was sensitive to 1 health input: specificity of IOC, and 3 costs: cost of hospitalization for LC with CBDE, cost of hospitalization for LC without CBDE, and cost of LC with IOC.

CONCLUSIONS

The most cost-effective treatment strategy for the majority of patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis is LC with routine IOC. If stones are detected, CBDE should be forgone and the patient referred for ERCP.

Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for removal of choledocholithiasis: indications, advantages, complications, and long-term follow-up results

Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) is an alternative method of endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST). Although concerns regarding post-procedure pancreatitis have been expressed, EPBD has come to be recognized as an effective and safe method for stone removal in specific cases. To analyze the proper indications, ideal methods, complications, and long-term follow-up results for EPBD, we reviewed articles about EPBD located through a search of the PubMed data base. We analyzed the ballooning methods, indications, results and complications of EPBD among the articles found and compared the results with those of EST. We considered the authors' own clinical experience and knowledge in developing recommendations for EPBD. EPBD showed similar efficacy and safety for the removal of choledocholithiasis to that of EST. Although large or multiple stones were difficult to remove by EPBD, it was safer and easier to apply in patients with coagulopathy or abnormal anatomy. To prevent severe pancreatitis, excessive ballooning and impractical cannulation should be avoided, and precut sphincterotomy or adjuvant prophylaxis should be considered. Due to its preservation of the sphincter of Oddi, EPBD is expected to have fewer long-term complications, such as stone recurrence, cholangitis and cholecystitis. In conclusion, EPBD appears to be safe and effective for the treatment of choledocholithiasis with proper selection of ballooning methods and patients.

Large balloon dilatation following endoscopic sphincterotomy using a balloon enteroscope for the bile duct stone extractions in patients with Roux-en-Y anastomosis

BACKGROUND

Extraction of bile duct stones in patients who have undergone Roux-en-Y anastomosis can be challenging. Recently, large balloon dilation following endoscopic sphincterotomy has been shown to be useful for the removal of bile duct stones.

AIM

We retrospectively evaluated the feasibility and safety of endoscopic sphincterotomy large balloon dilation for the removal of bile duct stones in patients with Roux-en-Y anastomosis.

METHODS

Large balloon papillary dilation following EST for the removal of bile duct stones was performed on the intact papilla in 15 patients with Roux-en-Y anastomosis at our institution. When we could not use the long-type accessories, a conventional forward-viewing upper endoscope passed through the over tube of the single-balloon or double-balloon enteroscope for the use of short-type accessories. Following endoscopic sphincterotomy, a large balloon catheter was positioned across the main duodenal papilla. The size of large balloon used ranged from 15mm to 20mm.

RESULTS

Complete clearance of bile duct stones was achieved in all cases in the initial session without any adverse events. A mechanical lithotriptor for crushing stones was used in one patient (6.7%).

CONCLUSION

Large balloon papillary dilation following EST appears to be an effective and safe treatment for difficult-to-remove bile duct stones in patients with Roux-en-Y anastomosis .

Large balloon dilation vs. mechanical lithotripsy for the management of large bile duct stones: a prospective randomized study

OBJECTIVES

The removal of large bile duct stones (>12 mm) after endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) remains a challenging issue in therapeutic endoscopy. The aim of this prospective, randomized, controlled trial was to compare the effectiveness and complications of EST followed by large balloon dilation (LBD) with that of EST followed by mechanical lithotripsy (ML) for the management of large bile duct stones.

METHODS

A total of 90 patients with large bile duct stones (12-20 mm) were randomized to EST followed by LBD (n=45) or EST followed by ML (n=45). Success rate was determined with a final cholangiogram, whereas type and rate of post-procedure complications were assessed prospectively.

RESULTS

Complete bile duct stone removal was accomplished in 97.7% of patients subjected to EST-LBD as compared with 91.1% of those subjected to EST-ML (P=0.36). Post-procedure complications were observed in two (4.4%) patients subjected to EST-LBD and in nine (20%) patients subjected to EST-ML (P=0.049). Rates of pancreatitis were similar between the two groups (one case in each), as was post-endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography (ERCP) hemorrhage (one case in each group). None of the patients subjected to EST-LBD developed cholangitis, while this was seen in six patients subjected to EST-ML (0.0 vs. 13.3%, P=0.026). One patient subjected to EST-ML developed perforation, which was successfully managed conservatively. None of our patients with complications died.

CONCLUSIONS

EST followed by LBD is equally effective as EST followed by ML for the removal of large bile duct stones, although it is associated with fewer complications.

The increase in balloon size to over 15 mm does not affect the development of pancreatitis after endoscopic papillary large balloon dilatation for bile duct stone removal

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilatation (EPLBD) after endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) has recently become widely used for common bile duct (CBD) stone removal, but many clinicians remain concerned about post-procedural pancreatitis with increasing the balloon size to over 15 mm.

AIMS

We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EPLBD with a relatively large balloon (15-20 mm) after EST and to evaluate the factors related to post-EPLBD pancreatitis.

METHODS

A retrospective review was undertaken of the endoscopic database of 101 patients with CBD stones who underwent EPLBD using a larger balloon size of over 15 mm (15-20 mm). Clinical parameters, endoscopic data, and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean age of the subjects was 69 years. All patients had a dilated CBD of over 11 mm (mean = 22.6 mm). The mean size of balloon used in EPLBD was 17.1 ± 1.9 mm (range 15-20 mm). Mechanical lithotripsy was required in seven patients (6.9%). The rate of complete stone removal in the first session was 92.1%. Post-procedural pancreatitis developed in five cases (5.4%), but none were graded as severe. The smaller dilatation of the CBD, longer cannulation time, and longer time for stone removal were associated with post-procedural pancreatitis, but larger size of balloon did not affect the development of post-EPLBD pancreatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

EPLBD with a large balloon of over 15 mm with EST is an effective and safe procedure with a very low probability of severe post-procedural pancreatitis. Post-EPLBD pancreatitis was not associated with larger balloon size, but was associated with longer procedure time and smaller dilatation of the CBD.

Randomized trial of 1-minute versus 5-minute endoscopic balloon dilation for extraction of bile duct stones

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) has a lower risk of hemorrhage than sphincterotomy and is easier to perform in altered/difficult anatomy. However, the sphincter of Oddi (SO) is only stretched but not cut after EPBD. Therefore, the biliary orifice is less opened, and failed stone extraction with EPBD alone occurs in up to 20% of patients. An uncut SO also may exacerbate pancreatic duct compression from edema after EPBD, and it increases the risk of pancreatitis.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a longer duration for EPBD (5-minute vs conventional 1-minute) can further weaken the SO and reduce the rates of failed stone extraction and pancreatitis.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized trial.

SETTING

Two tertiary-care referral centers.

PATIENTS

This study involved 170 consecutive patients with common bile duct stones.

INTERVENTION

EPBD for 1 minute (n = 86) or 5 minutes (n = 84).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Failed stone extraction with EPBD alone and post-ERCP pancreatitis.

RESULTS

Failed stone extraction with EPBD alone was less frequent with 5-minute EPBD (6 of 84, 7.1%) than with 1-minute EPBD (17 of 86, 19.8%), with a relative risk (RR) of 0.36 (P = .024). The risk of pancreatitis was also lower with 5-minute EPBD (4 of 84, 4.8%) than with 1-minute EPBD (13 of 86, 15.1%), with an RR of 0.32 (P = .038). Multivariable logistic regression analyses reaffirmed that 5-minute EPBD reduced the risk of failure with EPBD alone (odds ratio [OR] 0.19, P = .010) and pancreatitis (OR 0.28, P = .035).

LIMITATIONS

Endoscopists could not be blinded after the dilation durations were randomly assigned.

CONCLUSION

Compared with conventional 1-minute EPBD, 5-minute EPBD improves efficacy of stone extraction and reduces the risk of pancreatitis. (

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00451581).

New large-diameter balloon-equipped sphincterotome for removal of large bile duct stones (with videos)

BACKGROUND

Recently, endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy (EBS) followed by large-diameter balloon dilation has been used for the removal of large bile duct stones. A limitation is the need for 2 accessories: a sphincterotome and a dilating balloon.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a new device, a combination of a large-diameter dilating balloon and sphincterotome (LDDBS).

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENTS

Eighteen patients with large bile duct stones.

INTERVENTIONS

After performing EBS by using the LDDBS, the catheter was then advanced into the bile duct and balloon dilation was performed by gradual inflation with diluted contrast medium under endoscopic and fluoroscopic guidance until it reached a diameter adequate to allow stone removal.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Feasibility and efficacy of stone removal by using an LDDBS.

RESULTS

Technical success of large-diameter balloon dilation after EBS was achieved in all cases. Bile duct clearance was accomplished in 94% (17/18) of cases in the first session. Bile duct clearance was eventually completed in all patients. Mechanical lithotripsy was required in 4 patients (22%). There were no major intraprocedural or postprocedural complications.

LIMITATIONS

Single-institution study, small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

The prototype LDDBS is safe and effective to facilitate the removal of large bile duct stones by using one accessory.

Large balloon dilation for the treatment of recurrent bile duct stones in patients with previous endoscopic sphincterotomy: preliminary results

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) is an established method to treat common bile duct (CBD) stones. Inevitable sequence after ES is a substantial risk of recurrent choledocholithiasis and occasional difficulty in removal of large or multiple CBD stones after ES even when mechanical lithotripsy (ML) is employed. In turn, a new endoscopic technique, large balloon dilation (LBD) after ES, has been introduced. The objective was to analyze the efficacy and safety of LBD in patients with recurrent bile duct stones who have previously undergone ES.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From December 2007 to November 2009, 24 patients with recurrent choledocholithiasis and a history of ES were treated with LBD without additional ES. The size of the balloon for LBD was 15-20 mm and the duration of balloon dilation was 30 s.

RESULTS

Successful stone removal and complications such as perforation, pancreatitis, and bleeding were evaluated as procedure-related outcomes. Postoperative CBD stone recurrence was evaluated as the short term outcome. Complete duct clearance rate without using ML was 96% (23/24 patients) and all stone removal was achieved in one session. Failure to remove stones occurred in one (4.2%) patient. There were no procedure-related complications although one case of aspiration pneumonia occurred after the endoscopy. Recurrent choledocholithiasis after LBD was observed in 12.5% (3/24) of the cases overall.

CONCLUSIONS

LBD is an effective and safe method in patients with recurrent choledocholithiasis not only to treat large stones but also to prevent further recurrence.

Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for bile duct stone removal in patients 60 years old or younger

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes in relatively young patients (≤ 60 years old) who underwent endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) for bile duct stone removal.

METHODS

Immediate and long-term outcomes were evaluated in 311 patients who were 60 years old or younger at the time of EPBD. The stone recurrence rate was compared among four groups stratified according to gallbladder (GB) status before and after EPBD (cholecystectomy after EPBD, GB left in situ with stones, GB left in situ without stones, and cholecystectomy before EPBD).

RESULTS

Bile duct stones were completely removed via EPBD alone in 304 patients (97.7%). Post-EPBD pancreatitis occurred in 24 patients (7.7%), and was mild in 18 patients, moderate in 5 patients, and severe in 1 patient. The rate of pancreatitis was significantly higher in these patients than in patients aged more than 60 years who underwent EPBD during the same study period (4.7%). Long-term outcomes were evaluated in 217 patients who were followed for at least 1 year after complete stone removal via EPBD. During a mean follow-up period of 5.6 years (range, 1.0-13.4 years), stone recurrence was observed in 13 patients (6.0%). The cumulative stone recurrence rates at 5 and 10 years after EPBD were 5.9 and 7.1%, respectively. Patients in the cholecystectomy after EPBD group had the lowest risk of stone recurrence among the four groups (2.0%).

CONCLUSION

EPBD removes bile duct stones in the majority of younger patients without increasing the risk of severe pancreatitis. Post-EPBD pancreatitis is more likely to occur in younger patients as compared to older patients. The long-term outcomes of EPBD appear favorable, especially in patients who have undergone cholecystectomy after EPBD.

Limited endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large balloon dilation for choledocholithiasis with periampullary diverticula

AIM: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of limited endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) plus large balloon dilation (LBD) for removing choledocholithiasis in patients with periampullary diverticula (PAD).

METHODS: A total of 139 patients with common bile duct (CBD) stones were treated with LBD (10-20 mm balloon diameter) after limited EST. Of this total, 73 patients had PAD and 66 patients did not have PAD (controls). The results of stone removal and complications were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the PAD and the control groups in overall successful stone removal (94.5% vs 93.9%), stone removal in first session (69.9% vs 81.8%), mechanical lithotripsy (12.3% vs 13.6%), and complications (11.0% vs 7.6%). Clinical outcomes were also similar between the types of PAD, but the rate of stone removal in first session and the number of sessions were significantly lower and more frequent, respectively, in type B PAD (papilla located near the diverticulum) than controls [23/38 (60.5%) vs 54/66 (81.8%), P = 0.021; and 1 (1-2) vs 1 (1-3), P = 0.037, respectively] and the frequency of pancreatitis was significantly higher in type A PAD (papilla located inside or in the margin of the diverticulum) than in controls (16.1% vs 3.0%, P = 0.047).

CONCLUSION: Limited EST plus LBD was an effective and safe procedure for removing choledocholithiasis in patients with PAD. However, some types of PAD should be managed with caution.

Multimedia article. Sphincterotome stricturoplasty for long ampullary stenoses and benign biliary strictures (with video)

BACKGROUND

Long ampullary stenoses and fibrotic distal biliary strictures are not infrequently encountered during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Instead of balloon dilation and stenting, we propose that these strictures can be managed with sphincterotome stricturoplasty (SS) during the initial ERCP.

OBJECTIVE

To report our clinical experience with SS for benign distal biliary strictures.

DESIGN

Review on prospectively collected data.

PATIENTS

All (consecutive) patients who underwent ERCP and SS performed by the authors in a 12-month period. Long ampullary stenosis and/or distal biliary stricture is defined as significant narrowing of CBD from the level of duodenal wall into the common bile duct (CBD) after initial sphincterotomy. The upstream CBD is dilated. Despite adequate ES, contrast drainage is poor due to the downstream stricture. SS was performed using the same sphincterotome in slightly bowed position under endoscopic and fluoroscopic guidance. The cutting wire was placed parallel to the superior border within the stricture and incising the stenosis. In cases of relatively long strictures, during initial SS the majority of the cutting wire was inside the biliary opening. This differs from ES, where about one-third to one-half of the length of cutting wire is outside the ampulla.

MEASUREMENTS

Clinical data, hospital course, procedure-related complication rates, and outcomes were prospectively collected in a database.

RESULTS

During the study period, 308 ERCPs were performed. Benign and short (≤15 mm in length) distal biliary strictures were observed in 25 patients. Mean ± SD stricture length was 7.4 ± 3.0 mm. The presumed etiologies for these strictures were choledocholithiasis (n = 22) and postsphincterotomy stenosis (n = 3). There was no perforation, post-ERCP pancreatitis, postsphincterotomy bleeding, or cholangitis. To date, none of these patients who had SS have needed follow-up ERCP.

LIMITATIONS

Single-operator experience, limited follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with balloon stricturoplasty ± biliary stenting, SS is a simple and cost-effective alternative option in managing long ampullary stenosis and/or distal fibrotic biliary stricture during the initial ERCP.

Effects of large-balloon dilation on the major duodenal papilla and the lower bile duct: histological evaluation by using an ex vivo adult porcine model

BACKGROUND

Several articles have reported the usefulness of large-balloon dilation after endoscopic sphincterotomy in removing bile duct stones. Its histological effect on the duodenal papilla and the lower bile duct, however, is not well established.

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate the histological consequence of large-balloon dilation.

DESIGN

Animal experiment.

SETTING

A referral center.

MATERIALS AND INTERVENTIONS

After the evaluation of normal anatomy of the major duodenal papilla and the lower bile duct in resected specimens from pigs, large-balloon dilation (12-20 mm) after small sphincterotomy was performed, and serial tissue sections were assessed for morphological changes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Macroscopic and microscopic findings of the duodenal papilla and the lower bile duct after large balloon dilation, with special interest in ductal wall disruption and perforation.

RESULTS

The porcine specimens were comparable in size to humans. Balloons with diameters 12 mm or larger caused disruption of the ductal walls, and those 15 mm or larger resulted in perforation of the surrounding adipose tissue. The frequency of disruption and perforation increased in proportion to the balloon diameters.

LIMITATIONS

Other sequelae including hemorrhage, pancreatitis, acute inflammatory changes, and late fibrosis could not be investigated in our ex vivo porcine model.

CONCLUSIONS

Dilation with large balloons can tear the bile duct wall and cause potential impairment of sphincter function and overdilation of small extrahepatic bile ducts.

Alternative methods in the endoscopic management of difficult common bile duct stones

The endoscopic method is accepted as a first treatment modality in the management of extrahepatic bile duct. Most large stones can be removed with basket and mechanical lithotripsy after endoscopic sphincterotomy. Currently, in treating large extrahepatic bile duct stones, endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation with mid-incision endoscopic sphincterotomy is actively performed instead of applying mechanical lithotripsy after full endoscopic sphincterotomy. Herein, we describe the conceptions, proper indications, methods and complications of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation with regards to currently published reports. In addition, intracorporeal lithotripsy by peroral cholangioscopy with an ultra-slim upper endoscope is introduced, which is more convenient than previous conventional intracorporeal lithotripsy methods using mother-baby endoscopy or percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy. Lastly, biliary stenting with the choleretic agent administration method is briefly reviewed as an alternative treatment option for frail and elderly patients with large impacted common bile duct stones.

Endoscopic treatment of difficult common bile duct stones

Recent developments in treatment devices and advancements in technology have made endoscopic treatment the first choice for bile duct stones. In endoscopic treatment, the stones are removed after expanding the papilla with endoscopic sphincterotomy or endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation. The devices used to remove bile duct stones include basket catheters, balloon catheters and mechanical lithotripters, and their employment varies depending on the clinical situation. Stone removal by endoscopy is superior to other options, although treatment can be difficult in some cases. The reasons are mainly large stones, a history of gastric surgery, and Mirizzi syndrome. For such difficult cases, various adjuvant treatments such as extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, electrohydraulic lithotripsy and lasers are recommended rather than using just a mechanical lithotripter. Recently, large-diameter biliary orifice balloon dilation, a method in which the papilla is expanded using a large-diameter balloon, allowing the stones to be removed, has been reported and is attracting increasing attention.

Large balloon papillary dilation for removal of bile duct stones in patients who have undergone a billroth ii gastrectomy

Extraction of large bile duct stones in patients who have undergone a Billroth II (B-II) gastrectomy can be challenging. Recently, a large balloon dilation performed after endoscopic sphincterotomy (ESLBD) was useful for the removal of large bile duct stones. The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of ESLBD for removal of bile duct stones in patients who have undergone a B-II gastrectomy. ESLBD for removal of bile duct stones were performed in 11 patients with a B-II gastrectomy at Tokyo Medical University Hospital. Immediately after EST, a large balloon catheter (maximum diameter 15 mm, 18 mm, or 20 mm) was passed over the guide-wire and positioned across the main duodenal papilla. Maximum stone size (short diameter) ranged from 7 to 30 mm with a median of 13.5 mm. The number of stones was 1-26 with a median of 4.8. The common bile duct diameter was 10 mm to 30 mm with a median of 18.1 mm. A mechanical lithotripter for crushing stones was used in two patients (18%). Papillary balloon dilation using variously sized balloons was performed in addition to endoscopic sphincterotomy. Complete clearance of bile duct stones was achieved in all cases at one session. There were no procedure-related adverse events such as acute pancreatitis or retroperitoneal perforation. ESLBD appears to be an effective and safe treatment for removal of difficult bile duct stones in patients who have undergone a B-II gastrectomy.

Endoscopic management of bile duct stones

Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) and endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) are endoscopic techniques that are used for the removal of bile duct stones. Although EST and EPBD have become established techniques, occasionally the management of bile duct stones may be difficult in cases of large stones, multiple stones, and tapering or tortuosity of the distal common bile duct. In such patients, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, mechanical lithotripsy or electrohydraulic lithotripsy, laser lithotripsy, or surgical intervention may be necessary. Furthermore, recently EST plus a large papillary balloon dilation has been popular for the treatment of difficult bile duct stones. Currently, endoscopic lithotripsy for bile duct stones seems to be a promising standard technique.

Endoscopic management of biliary ductal stones

Bile duct stone management has greatly changed in the past 2 decades. Open surgical techniques have mostly been replaced by transoral endoscopic techniques. Routine common bile duct stones can be managed by standard biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy and extraction. Various advanced transoral techniques can also manage most difficult ductal stones. In skilled centers, laparoscopic ductal stone management has assumed a back-up role.

Surgical treatment of gallstones

Currently there is no evidence for prophylactic cholecystectomy to prevent gallstone formation (grade B). Cholecystectomy cannot be recommended for any group of patients having asymptomatic gallstones except in those undergoing major upper abdominal surgery for other pathologies (grade B). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the preferred treatment for all patient groups with symptomatic gallstones (grade B). Patients with gallstones along with common bile duct stones treated by endoscopic sphincterotomy should undergo cholecystectomy (grade A). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration or with intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy is the preferred treatment for obstructive jaundice caused by common bile duct stones, when the expertise and infrastructure are available (grade B).

Endoscopic removal of a bile-duct stone using sphincterotomy and a large-balloon dilator in a patient with situs inversus totalis

A 45-year-old female with known situs inversus totalis presented with colicky pain in the left upper abdominal quadrant. The laboratory parameters showed elevated neutrophils and a bilirubin level of 2 mg/dL. CT confirmed situs inversus totalis and dilatation of the intra- and extrahepatic ducts with a 10-mm common bile duct (CBD) stone and a 10-mm gallstone. She underwent papillary dilatation using a radial expansion balloon after sphincterotomy, after which the CBD stone was removed with a basket and balloon. There were no complications, such as bleeding, pancreatitis, or perforation. It might be reasonable to attempt a "partial" biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by a large-balloon dilator in patients with concomitant distal bile duct, papillary stenosis, or altered anatomy (e.g., periampullary diverticulum, Billroth II anatomy). However, when performing an "adequate" biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy this is technically difficult, or in some cases even impossible, and is associated with a higher risk of complications. This paper further expands on the application of these techniques and shows that a papillary balloon dilatation after endoscopic sphincterotomy is a safe, easy, and effective technique for removing bile-duct stones in a patient with situs inversus totalis.

Single Balloon Enteroscopy-Assisted ERCP Using Rendezvous Technique for Sharp Angulation of Roux-en-Y Limb in a Patient with Bile Duct Stones

The acute angulation of Roux-en-Y (R-Y) limb precludes endoscopic access for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) even using a balloon enteroscopy. Here, we describe a case of successful single balloon enteroscopy (SBE)-assisted ERCP using a rendezvous technique in a patient with sharply angulated R-Y limb in a 79-year-old woman who had bile duct stones. Method. At first, a guidewire was passed antegradely through the major papilla after the needle puncture using percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage technique. A hydrophilic guidewire with an ERCP catheter was antegradely advanced beyond the Roux limb. After a guidewire was firmly grasped by a snare forceps, it was pulled out of the body, resulting that the enteroscope could advance to the papilla. After papillary dilation, complete removal of bile duct stones was achieved without any procedure-related complication. In conclusion, although further study is needed, SBE-assisted ERCP using a rendezvous technique may have a potential for selected patients.

Endoscopic large-balloon sphincteroplasty without preceding sphincterotomy for the removal of large bile duct stones: a preliminary study

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) has usually been performed before large-balloon sphincteroplasty (LBS) to retrieve large bile duct stones because of the high risk of pancreatitis and some advantages of EST. However, there are no available data on the preceding EST to confirm these assertions.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the safety and efficacy of LBS without a preceding EST for the management of large bile duct stones.

DESIGN

Single-institution retrospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Thirty-eight patients with large bile duct stones.

INTERVENTIONS

Endoscopic LBS without preceding EST.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Efficacy of stone removal and complications related to the procedure.

RESULTS

The overall success rate irrespective of whether mechanical lithotripsy (ML) was used was 97.4% (37/38). Complete duct clearance by LBS alone without ML was achieved in 29 (76.3%) patients. Complete stone retrieval was achieved by LBS alone in the first session in 25 (65.8%) patients. ML was required in 8 (21.1%) patients. Failure to extract a stone occurred in 1 (2.6%) patient. There was a mild degree of postprocedure pancreatitis in only 1 (2.6%) patient and asymptomatic hyperamylasemia in 3 (7.9%) patients. The maximum diameters of the stones and the balloon/stone diameter ratio had a tendency to affect complete stone retrieval in the success and failure groups: 16.7 +/- 3.9 mm vs 20.8 +/- 6.5 mm and 0.96 +/- 0.19 mm vs 0.80 +/- 0.23 mm, respectively (results are presented as mean +/- standard deviation).

LIMITATIONS

Small-scale, single-arm study.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that LBS without EST is safe and effective in patients with large bile duct stones.

Clinical role of frequency-doubled double-pulsed yttrium aluminum garnet laser technology for removing difficult bile duct stones (with videos)

BACKGROUND

Very few clinical trials have reported on the success rate of frequency-doubled double-pulse yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) laser (FREDDY) technology for removal of difficult bile duct stones.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to evaluate the role of FREDDY technology for removing difficult bile duct stones.

DESIGN

Nonrandomized, retrospective study.

SETTING

Academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Fifty-two patients with difficult bile duct stones were treated via the transpapillary route by using a FREDDY system. The inclusion criteria were impacted or large common bile duct stones (>15 mm, mean 23.5 mm, range 15-35 mm, mean number of stones 1.7, range 1-4). Laser lithotripsy was performed with cholangioscopy guidance in 7 patients and fluoroscopic guidance alone in 45 patients.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The success rate of complete stone removal and the complication rate related to the procedure.

RESULTS

Of the 52 patients treated via the transpapillary route, complete stone removal was achieved in 48 patients (92.3%). The complete removal of stones required a mean of 1.4 (range 1-2) endoscopic sessions. The rate of complications related to laser lithotripsy was 23.0% (acute pancreatitis, 3 cases; transient hemobilia, 8 cases; acute cholangitis, 1 case).

LIMITATIONS

Nonrandomized, retrospective design.

CONCLUSION

Laser lithotripsy by using the FREDDY system seems safe and effective and allows "blind" fragmentation of bile duct stones under fluoroscopic guidance only.