101
|
Karki K, Saraiya S, Hugo GD, Mukhopadhyay N, Jan N, Schuster J, Schutzer M, Fahrner L, Groves R, Olsen KM, Ford JC, Weiss E. Variabilities of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-, Computed Tomography-, and Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography-Based Tumor and Lymph Node Delineations for Lung Cancer Radiation Therapy Planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 99:80-89. [PMID: 28816167 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2016] [Revised: 04/18/2017] [Accepted: 05/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate interobserver delineation variability for gross tumor volumes of primary lung tumors and associated pathologic lymph nodes using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to compare the results with computed tomography (CT) alone- and positron emission tomography (PET)-CT-based delineations. METHODS AND MATERIALS Seven physicians delineated the tumor volumes of 10 patients for the following scenarios: (1) CT only, (2) PET-CT fusion images registered to CT ("clinical standard"), and (3) postcontrast T1-weighted MRI registered with diffusion-weighted MRI. To compute interobserver variability, the median surface was generated from all observers' contours and used as the reference surface. A physician labeled the interface types (tumor to lung, atelectasis (collapsed lung), hilum, mediastinum, or chest wall) on the median surface. Contoured volumes and bidirectional local distances between individual observers' contours and the reference contour were analyzed. RESULTS Computed tomography- and MRI-based tumor volumes normalized relative to PET-CT-based volumes were 1.62 ± 0.76 (mean ± standard deviation) and 1.38 ± 0.44, respectively. Volume differences between the imaging modalities were not significant. Between observers, the mean normalized volumes per patient averaged over all patients varied significantly by a factor of 1.6 (MRI) and 2.0 (CT and PET-CT) (P=4.10 × 10-5 to 3.82 × 10-9). The tumor-atelectasis interface had a significantly higher variability than other interfaces for all modalities combined (P=.0006). The interfaces with the smallest uncertainties were tumor-lung (on CT) and tumor-mediastinum (on PET-CT and MRI). CONCLUSIONS Although MRI-based contouring showed overall larger variability than PET-CT, contouring variability depended on the interface type and was not significantly different between modalities, despite the limited observer experience with MRI. Multimodality imaging and combining different imaging characteristics might be the best approach to define the tumor volume most accurately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kishor Karki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Siddharth Saraiya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio
| | - Geoffrey D Hugo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Nitai Mukhopadhyay
- Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Nuzhat Jan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Jessica Schuster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Matthew Schutzer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Lester Fahrner
- Department of Radiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Robert Groves
- Department of Radiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Kathryn M Olsen
- Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado
| | - John C Ford
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - Elisabeth Weiss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
| |
Collapse
|
102
|
Beichel RR, Smith BJ, Bauer C, Ulrich EJ, Ahmadvand P, Budzevich MM, Gillies RJ, Goldgof D, Grkovski M, Hamarneh G, Huang Q, Kinahan PE, Laymon CM, Mountz JM, Muzi JP, Muzi M, Nehmeh S, Oborski MJ, Tan Y, Zhao B, Sunderland JJ, Buatti JM. Multi-site quality and variability analysis of 3D FDG PET segmentations based on phantom and clinical image data. Med Phys 2017; 44:479-496. [PMID: 28205306 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2016] [Revised: 11/15/2016] [Accepted: 11/21/2016] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiomics utilizes a large number of image-derived features for quantifying tumor characteristics that can in turn be correlated with response and prognosis. Unfortunately, extraction and analysis of such image-based features is subject to measurement variability and bias. The challenge for radiomics is particularly acute in Positron Emission Tomography (PET) where limited resolution, a high noise component related to the limited stochastic nature of the raw data, and the wide variety of reconstruction options confound quantitative feature metrics. Extracted feature quality is also affected by tumor segmentation methods used to define regions over which to calculate features, making it challenging to produce consistent radiomics analysis results across multiple institutions that use different segmentation algorithms in their PET image analysis. Understanding each element contributing to these inconsistencies in quantitative image feature and metric generation is paramount for ultimate utilization of these methods in multi-institutional trials and clinical oncology decision making. METHODS To assess segmentation quality and consistency at the multi-institutional level, we conducted a study of seven institutional members of the National Cancer Institute Quantitative Imaging Network. For the study, members were asked to segment a common set of phantom PET scans acquired over a range of imaging conditions as well as a second set of head and neck cancer (HNC) PET scans. Segmentations were generated at each institution using their preferred approach. In addition, participants were asked to repeat segmentations with a time interval between initial and repeat segmentation. This procedure resulted in overall 806 phantom insert and 641 lesion segmentations. Subsequently, the volume was computed from the segmentations and compared to the corresponding reference volume by means of statistical analysis. RESULTS On the two test sets (phantom and HNC PET scans), the performance of the seven segmentation approaches was as follows. On the phantom test set, the mean relative volume errors ranged from 29.9 to 87.8% of the ground truth reference volumes, and the repeat difference for each institution ranged between -36.4 to 39.9%. On the HNC test set, the mean relative volume error ranged between -50.5 to 701.5%, and the repeat difference for each institution ranged between -37.7 to 31.5%. In addition, performance measures per phantom insert/lesion size categories are given in the paper. On phantom data, regression analysis resulted in coefficient of variation (CV) components of 42.5% for scanners, 26.8% for institutional approaches, 21.1% for repeated segmentations, 14.3% for relative contrasts, 5.3% for count statistics (acquisition times), and 0.0% for repeated scans. Analysis showed that the CV components for approaches and repeated segmentations were significantly larger on the HNC test set with increases by 112.7% and 102.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION Analysis results underline the importance of PET scanner reconstruction harmonization and imaging protocol standardization for quantification of lesion volumes. In addition, to enable a distributed multi-site analysis of FDG PET images, harmonization of analysis approaches and operator training in combination with highly automated segmentation methods seems to be advisable. Future work will focus on quantifying the impact of segmentation variation on radiomics system performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reinhard R Beichel
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Brian J Smith
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Christian Bauer
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Ethan J Ulrich
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Payam Ahmadvand
- School of Computing Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada
| | | | | | - Dmitry Goldgof
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Milan Grkovski
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ghassan Hamarneh
- School of Computing Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada
| | - Qiao Huang
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paul E Kinahan
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Charles M Laymon
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - James M Mountz
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - John P Muzi
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Mark Muzi
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sadek Nehmeh
- National Center for Cancer Care and Research, Doha, Qatar
| | - Matthew J Oborski
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Yongqiang Tan
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Binsheng Zhao
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - John M Buatti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
103
|
Effect of different segmentation algorithms on metabolic tumor volume measured on 18F-FDG PET/CT of cervical primary squamous cell carcinoma. Nucl Med Commun 2017; 38:259-265. [PMID: 28118260 PMCID: PMC5318156 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000000641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Background and purpose It is known that fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography (CT) segmentation algorithms have an impact on the metabolic tumor volume (MTV). This leads to some uncertainties in PET/CT guidance of tumor radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of segmentation algorithms on the PET/CT-based MTV and their correlations with the gross tumor volumes (GTVs) of cervical primary squamous cell carcinoma. Materials and methods Fifty-five patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage Ia∼IIb and histologically proven cervical squamous cell carcinoma were enrolled. A fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT scan was performed before definitive surgery. GTV was measured on surgical specimens. MTVs were estimated on PET/CT scans using different segmentation algorithms, including a fixed percentage of the maximum standardized uptake value (20∼60% SUVmax) threshold and iterative adaptive algorithm. We divided all patients into four different groups according to the SUVmax within target volume. The comparisons of absolute values and percentage differences between MTVs by segmentation and GTV were performed in different SUVmax subgroups. The optimal threshold percentage was determined from MTV20%∼MTV60%, and was correlated with SUVmax. The correlation of MTViterative adaptive with GTV was also investigated. Results MTV50% and MTV60% were similar to GTV in the SUVmax up to 5 (P>0.05). MTV30%∼MTV60% were similar to GTV (P>0.05) in the 5<SUVmax≤10 group. MTV20%∼MTV60% were similar to GTV (P>0.05) in the 10<SUVmax≤15 group. MTV20% and MTV30% were similar to GTV (P>0.05) in the SUVmax of at least 15 group. MTViterative adaptive was similar to GTV in both total and different SUVmax groups (P>0.05). Significant differences were observed among the fixed percentage method and the optimal threshold percentage was inversely correlated with SUVmax. The iterative adaptive segmentation algorithm led to the highest accuracy (6.66±50.83%). A significantly positive correlation was also observed between MTViterative adaptive and GTV (Pearson’s correlation r=0.87, P<0.0001). Conclusion MTViterative adaptive is independent of SUVmax, more accurate, and correlated with GTV. Iterative adaptive algorithm segmentation may be more suitable than the fixed percentage threshold method to estimate the tumor volume of cervical primary squamous cell carcinoma.
Collapse
|
104
|
Nielsen MS, Carl J. Validating PET segmentation of thoracic lesions—is 4D PET necessary? Biomed Phys Eng Express 2017. [DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/aa5ba9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
105
|
Giri MG, Cavedon C, Mazzarotto R, Ferdeghini M. A Dirichlet process mixture model for automatic (18)F-FDG PET image segmentation: Validation study on phantoms and on lung and esophageal lesions. Med Phys 2017; 43:2491. [PMID: 27147360 DOI: 10.1118/1.4947123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to implement a Dirichlet process mixture (DPM) model for automatic tumor edge identification on (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG PET) images by optimizing the parameters on which the algorithm depends, to validate it experimentally, and to test its robustness. METHODS The DPM model belongs to the class of the Bayesian nonparametric models and uses the Dirichlet process prior for flexible nonparametric mixture modeling, without any preliminary choice of the number of mixture components. The DPM algorithm implemented in the statistical software package R was used in this work. The contouring accuracy was evaluated on several image data sets: on an IEC phantom (spherical inserts with diameter in the range 10-37 mm) acquired by a Philips Gemini Big Bore PET-CT scanner, using 9 different target-to-background ratios (TBRs) from 2.5 to 70; on a digital phantom simulating spherical/uniform lesions and tumors, irregular in shape and activity; and on 20 clinical cases (10 lung and 10 esophageal cancer patients). The influence of the DPM parameters on contour generation was studied in two steps. In the first one, only the IEC spheres having diameters of 22 and 37 mm and a sphere of the digital phantom (41.6 mm diameter) were studied by varying the main parameters until the diameter of the spheres was obtained within 0.2% of the true value. In the second step, the results obtained for this training set were applied to the entire data set to determine DPM based volumes of all available lesions. These volumes were compared to those obtained by applying already known algorithms (Gaussian mixture model and gradient-based) and to true values, when available. RESULTS Only one parameter was found able to significantly influence segmentation accuracy (ANOVA test). This parameter was linearly connected to the uptake variance of the tested region of interest (ROI). In the first step of the study, a calibration curve was determined to automatically generate the optimal parameter from the variance of the ROI. This "calibration curve" was then applied to contour the whole data set. The accuracy (mean discrepancy between DPM model-based contours and reference contours) of volume estimation was below (1 ± 7)% on the whole data set (1 SD). The overlap between true and automatically segmented contours, measured by the Dice similarity coefficient, was 0.93 with a SD of 0.03. CONCLUSIONS The proposed DPM model was able to accurately reproduce known volumes of FDG concentration, with high overlap between segmented and true volumes. For all the analyzed inserts of the IEC phantom, the algorithm proved to be robust to variations in radius and in TBR. The main advantage of this algorithm was that no setting of DPM parameters was required in advance, since the proper setting of the only parameter that could significantly influence the segmentation results was automatically related to the uptake variance of the chosen ROI. Furthermore, the algorithm did not need any preliminary choice of the optimum number of classes to describe the ROIs within PET images and no assumption about the shape of the lesion and the uptake heterogeneity of the tracer was required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Grazia Giri
- Medical Physics Unit, University Hospital of Verona, P.le Stefani 1, Verona 37126, Italy
| | - Carlo Cavedon
- Medical Physics Unit, University Hospital of Verona, P.le Stefani 1, Verona 37126, Italy
| | - Renzo Mazzarotto
- Radiation Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Verona, P.le Stefani 1, Verona 37126, Italy
| | - Marco Ferdeghini
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, University Hospital of Verona, P.le Stefani 1, Verona 37126, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
106
|
Ohri N, Bodner WR, Halmos B, Cheng H, Perez-Soler R, Keller SM, Kalnicki S, Garg M. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose/Positron Emission Tomography Predicts Patterns of Failure After Definitive Chemoradiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 97:372-380. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.10.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2016] [Revised: 10/18/2016] [Accepted: 10/19/2016] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
107
|
Wang K, Mullins BT, Falchook AD, Lian J, He K, Shen D, Dance M, Lin W, Sills TM, Das SK, Huang BY, Chera BS. Evaluation of PET/MRI for Tumor Volume Delineation for Head and Neck Cancer. Front Oncol 2017; 7:8. [PMID: 28168166 PMCID: PMC5253486 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2016] [Accepted: 01/09/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Computed tomography (CT), combined positron emitted tomography and CT (PET/CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are commonly used in head and neck radiation planning. Hybrid PET/MRI has garnered attention for potential added value in cancer staging and treatment planning. Herein, we compare PET/MRI vs. planning CT for head and neck cancer gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation. Material and methods We prospectively enrolled patients with head and neck cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation to 60–70 Gy using IMRT. We performed pretreatment contrast-enhanced planning CT and gadolinium-enhanced PET/MRI. Primary and nodal volumes were delineated on planning CT (GTV-CT) prospectively before treatment and PET/MRI (GTV-PET/MRI) retrospectively after treatment. GTV-PET/MRI was compared to GTV-CT using separate rigid registrations for each tumor volume. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) metric evaluating spatial overlap and modified Hausdorff distance (mHD) evaluating mean orthogonal distance difference were calculated. Minimum dose to 95% of GTVs (D95) was compared. Results Eleven patients were evaluable (10 oropharynx, 1 larynx). Nine patients had evaluable primary tumor GTVs and seven patients had evaluable nodal GTVs. Mean primary GTV-CT and GTV-PET/MRI size were 13.2 and 14.3 cc, with mean intersection 8.7 cc, DSC 0.63, and mHD 1.6 mm. D95 was 65.3 Gy for primary GTV-CT vs. 65.2 Gy for primary GTV-PET/MRI. Mean nodal GTV-CT and GTV-PET/MRI size were 19.0 and 23.0 cc, with mean intersection 14.4 cc, DSC 0.69, and mHD 2.3 mm. D95 was 62.3 Gy for both nodal GTV-CT and GTV-PET/MRI. Conclusion In this series of patients with head and neck (primarily oropharynx) cancer, PET/MRI and CT-GTVs had similar volumes (though there were individual cases with larger differences) with overall small discrepancies in spatial overlap, small mean orthogonal distance differences, and similar radiation doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina Hospitals , Chapel Hill, NC , USA
| | - Brandon T Mullins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina Hospitals , Chapel Hill, NC , USA
| | - Aaron D Falchook
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina Hospitals , Chapel Hill, NC , USA
| | - Jun Lian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina Hospitals , Chapel Hill, NC , USA
| | - Kelei He
- State Key Laboratory for Novel Software Technology, Nanjing University , Nanjing , China
| | - Dinggang Shen
- Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina Hospitals , Chapel Hill, NC , USA
| | - Michael Dance
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina Hospitals , Chapel Hill, NC , USA
| | - Weili Lin
- Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina Hospitals , Chapel Hill, NC , USA
| | - Tiffany M Sills
- Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina Hospitals , Chapel Hill, NC , USA
| | - Shiva K Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina Hospitals , Chapel Hill, NC , USA
| | - Benjamin Y Huang
- Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina Hospitals , Chapel Hill, NC , USA
| | - Bhishamjit S Chera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina Hospitals , Chapel Hill, NC , USA
| |
Collapse
|
108
|
T Thomas HM, Devakumar D, Sasidharan B, Bowen SR, Heck DK, James Jebaseelan Samuel E. Hybrid positron emission tomography segmentation of heterogeneous lung tumors using 3D Slicer: improved GrowCut algorithm with threshold initialization. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2017; 4:011009. [PMID: 28149920 DOI: 10.1117/1.jmi.4.1.011009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2016] [Accepted: 12/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper presents an improved GrowCut (IGC), a positron emission tomography-based segmentation algorithm, and tests its clinical applicability. Contrary to the traditional method that requires the user to provide the initial seeds, the IGC algorithm starts with a threshold-based estimate of the tumor and a three-dimensional morphologically grown shell around the tumor as the foreground and background seeds, respectively. The repeatability of IGC from the same observer at multiple time points was compared with the traditional GrowCut algorithm. The algorithm was tested in 11 nonsmall cell lung cancer lesions and validated against the clinician-defined manual contour and compared against the clinically used 25% of the maximum standardized uptake value [SUV-(max)], 40% [Formula: see text], and adaptive threshold methods. The time to edit IGC-defined functional volume to arrive at the gross tumor volume (GTV) was compared with that of manual contouring. The repeatability of the IGC algorithm was very high compared with the traditional GrowCut ([Formula: see text]) and demonstrated higher agreement with the manual contour with respect to threshold-based methods. Compared with manual contouring, editing the IGC achieved the GTV in significantly less time ([Formula: see text]). The IGC algorithm offers a highly repeatable functional volume and serves as an effective initial guess that can well minimize the time spent on labor-intensive manual contouring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Mary T Thomas
- VIT University , School of Advanced Sciences, Department of Physics, Vellore, Tamil Nadu 632004, India
| | - Devadhas Devakumar
- Christian Medical College , Department of Nuclear Medicine, Vellore, Tamil Nadu 632004, India
| | - Balukrishna Sasidharan
- Christian Medical College , Department of Radiation Oncology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu 632004, India
| | - Stephen R Bowen
- University of Washington , School of Medicine, Departments of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States
| | - Danie Kingslin Heck
- Christian Medical College , Department of Nuclear Medicine, Vellore, Tamil Nadu 632004, India
| | - E James Jebaseelan Samuel
- VIT University , School of Advanced Sciences, Department of Physics, Vellore, Tamil Nadu 632004, India
| |
Collapse
|
109
|
Kitajima K, Doi H, Kuribayashi K, Hashimoto M, Tsuchitani T, Tanooka M, Fukushima K, Nakano T, Hasegawa S, Hirota S. Prognostic value of pretreatment volume-based quantitative 18 F-FDG PET/CT parameters in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Eur J Radiol 2017; 86:176-183. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2016] [Revised: 11/03/2016] [Accepted: 11/14/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
110
|
van Rossum PSN, Fried DV, Zhang L, Hofstetter WL, Ho L, Meijer GJ, Carter BW, Court LE, Lin SH. The value of 18F-FDG PET before and after induction chemotherapy for the early prediction of a poor pathologic response to subsequent preoperative chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017; 44:71-80. [PMID: 27511188 PMCID: PMC5121174 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-016-3478-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2016] [Accepted: 07/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of our study was to determine the value of 18F-FDG PET before and after induction chemotherapy in patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma for the early prediction of a poor pathologic response to subsequent preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). METHODS In 70 consecutive patients receiving a three-step treatment strategy of induction chemotherapy and preoperative chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal adenocarcinoma, 18F-FDG PET scans were performed before and after induction chemotherapy (before preoperative CRT). SUVmax, SUVmean, metabolic tumour volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were determined at these two time points. The predictive potential of (the change in) these parameters for a poor pathologic response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed. RESULTS A poor pathologic response after induction chemotherapy and preoperative CRT was found in 27 patients (39 %). Patients with a poor pathologic response experienced less of a reduction in TLG after induction chemotherapy (p < 0.01). The change in TLG was predictive for a poor pathologic response at a threshold of -26 % (sensitivity 67 %, specificity 84 %, accuracy 77 %, PPV 72 %, NPV 80 %), yielding an area-under-the-curve of 0.74 in ROC analysis. Also, patients with a decrease in TLG lower than 26 % had a significantly worse PFS (p = 0.02), but not OS (p = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS 18F-FDG PET appears useful to predict a poor pathologic response as well as PFS early after induction chemotherapy in patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma undergoing a three-step treatment strategy. As such, the early 18F-FDG PET response after induction chemotherapy could aid in individualizing treatment by modification or withdrawal of subsequent preoperative CRT in poor responders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter S N van Rossum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, Q00.3.11, 3508GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - David V Fried
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lifei Zhang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wayne L Hofstetter
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Linus Ho
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gert J Meijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, Q00.3.11, 3508GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Brett W Carter
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Laurence E Court
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven H Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
111
|
Kim TH, Yoon JK, Kang DK, Kang SY, Jung YS, Han S, Kim JY, Yim H, An YS. Value of volume-based metabolic parameters for predicting survival in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95:e4605. [PMID: 27741099 PMCID: PMC5072926 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000004605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
We evaluated the role of metabolic parameters in the prediction of disease recurrence in operable invasive ductal breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).We retrospectively evaluated 139 female patients (mean age, 46.5 years; range: 27-72 years) with invasive ductal breast cancer, treated with NAC followed by surgery. All patients underwent F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging at baseline and after completion of NAC before surgery. The prognostic significance of clinicopathological and imaging parameters for disease-free survival (DFS) was evaluated.Recurrence of cancer was detected in 31 of 139 patients (22.3%; follow-up period: 6-82 months). Baseline maximum standardized uptake value, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and reduction rate (RR) of MTV after NAC were significant independent prognostic factors for DFS in a multivariate analysis (all P < 0.05). The survival functions differed significantly between low and high histological grades (P < 0.001). DFS of the patients with high baseline MTV (≥5.23 cm) was significantly poorer than that of low MTV patients (P = 0.019). The survival function of the group with low RR of MTV after NAC (≤90.72%) was poorer than the higher RR of the MTV group (P = 0.008).Our findings suggest that breast cancer patients who have a high histological grade, large baseline MTV, or a small RR of MTV after NAC should receive great attention to check for possible recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joon-Kee Yoon
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Hyunee Yim
- Department of Pathology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Young-Sil An
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
- Correspondence: Young-Sil An, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, School of Medicine, Ajou University, Woncheon-dong, Yeongtong-gu, Gyeonggi-do, Suwon 443-749, Korea (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
112
|
Lodge MA, Holdhoff M, Leal JP, Bag AK, Nabors LB, Mintz A, Lesser GJ, Mankoff DA, Desai AS, Mountz JM, Lieberman FS, Fisher JD, Desideri S, Ye X, Grossman SA, Schiff D, Wahl RL. Repeatability of 18F-FLT PET in a Multicenter Study of Patients with High-Grade Glioma. J Nucl Med 2016; 58:393-398. [PMID: 27688473 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.178434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2016] [Accepted: 08/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Quantitative 3'-deoxy-3'-18F-fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) PET has potential as a noninvasive tumor biomarker for the objective assessment of response to treatment. To guide interpretation of these quantitative data, we evaluated the repeatability of 18F-FLT PET as part of a multicenter trial involving patients with high-grade glioma. Methods:18F-FLT PET was performed on 10 patients with recurrent high-grade glioma at 5 different institutions within the Adult Brain Tumor Consortium trial ABTC1101. Data were acquired according to a double baseline protocol in which PET examinations were repeated within 2 d of each other with no intervening treatment. On each of the 2 imaging days, dedicated brain PET was performed at 2 time points, 1 and 3 h after 18F-FLT administration. Tumor SUVs and related parameters were measured at a central laboratory using various volumes of interest: isocontour at 30% of the maximum pixel (SUVmean_30%), gradient-based segmentation (SUVmean_gradient), the maximum pixel (SUVmax), and a 1-mL sphere at the region of highest uptake (SUVpeak). Repeatability coefficients (RCs) were calculated from the relative differences between corresponding SUV measurements obtained on the 2 d. Results: RCs for tumor SUVs were 22.5% (SUVmean_30%), 23.8% (SUVmean_gradient), 23.2% (SUVmax), and 18.5% (SUVpeak) at 1 h after injection. Corresponding data at 3 h were 22.4%, 25.0%, 27.3%, and 23.6%. Normalizing the tumor SUV data with reference to a background region improved repeatability, and the most stable parameter was the tumor-to-background ratio derived using SUVpeak (RC, 16.5%). Conclusion: SUV quantification of 18F-FLT uptake in glioma had an RC in the range of 18%-24% when imaging began 1 h after 18F-FLT administration. The volume-of-interest methodology had a small but not negligible influence on repeatability, with the best performance obtained using SUVpeak Although changes in 18F-FLT SUV after treatment cannot be directly interpreted as a change in tumor proliferation, we have established ranges beyond which SUV differences are likely due to legitimate biologic effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin A Lodge
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Matthias Holdhoff
- Brain Cancer Program, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jeffrey P Leal
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Asim K Bag
- University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama
| | | | - Akiva Mintz
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina
| | - Glenn J Lesser
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina
| | | | - Arati S Desai
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - James M Mountz
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Frank S Lieberman
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Joy D Fisher
- Brain Cancer Program, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Serena Desideri
- Brain Cancer Program, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Xiaobu Ye
- Brain Cancer Program, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Stuart A Grossman
- Brain Cancer Program, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - David Schiff
- University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Richard L Wahl
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Brain Cancer Program, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
113
|
Multiple training interventions significantly improve reproducibility of PET/CT-based lung cancer radiotherapy target volume delineation using an IAEA study protocol. Radiother Oncol 2016; 121:39-45. [PMID: 27663950 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2016] [Revised: 09/01/2016] [Accepted: 09/04/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To assess the impact of a standardized delineation protocol and training interventions on PET/CT-based target volume delineation (TVD) in NSCLC in a multicenter setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS Over a one-year period, 11 pairs, comprised each of a radiation oncologist and nuclear medicine physician with limited experience in PET/CT-based TVD for NSCLC from nine different countries took part in a training program through an International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) study (NCT02247713). Teams delineated gross tumor volume of the primary tumor, during and after training interventions, according to a provided delineation protocol. In-house developed software recorded the performed delineations, to allow visual inspection of strategies and to assess delineation accuracy. RESULTS Following the first training, overall concordance indices for 3 repetitive cases increased from 0.57±0.07 to 0.66±0.07. The overall mean surface distance between observer and expert contours decreased from -0.40±0.03cm to -0.01±0.33cm. After further training overall concordance indices for another 3 repetitive cases further increased from 0.64±0.06 to 0.80±0.05 (p=0.01). Mean surface distances decreased from -0.34±0.16cm to -0.05±0.20cm (p=0.01). CONCLUSION Multiple training interventions improve PET/CT-based TVD delineation accuracy in NSCLC and reduce interobserver variation.
Collapse
|
114
|
Consistency of metabolic tumor volume of non-small-cell lung cancer primary tumor measured using 18F-FDG PET/CT at two different tracer uptake times. Nucl Med Commun 2016; 37:50-6. [PMID: 26426969 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000000396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that the metabolic tumor volume (MTV) of primary non-small-cell lung cancer is not sensitive to differences in F-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) uptake time, and to compare this consistency of MTV measurements with that of standardized uptake value (SUV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). METHODS Under Institutional Review Board approval, 134 consecutive patients with histologically proven non-small-cell lung cancer underwent F-FDG PET/computed tomography scanning at about 1 h (early) and 2 h (delayed) after intravenous injection of F-FDG. MTV, SUV, and TLG of the primary tumor were all measured. Student's t-test and Wilcoxon's signed-rank test for paired data were used to compare MTV, SUV, and TLG between the two scans. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess agreement in PET parameters between the two scans and between the measurements made by two observers. RESULTS MTV was not significantly different (P=0.17) between the two scans. However, SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak, and TLG increased significantly from the early to the delayed scans (P<0.0001 for all). The median percentage change between the two scans in MTV (1.65%) was smaller than in SUVmax (11.76%), SUVmean(10.57%), SUVpeak(13.51%), and TLG (14.34%); the ICC of MTV (0.996) was greater than that of SUVmax (0.933), SUVmean (0.952), SUVpeak (0.928), and TLG (0.982). Interobserver agreement between the two radiologists was excellent for MTV, SUV, and TLG on both scans (ICC: 0.934-0.999). CONCLUSION MTV is not sensitive to common clinical variations in F-FDG uptake time, its consistency is greater than that of SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak, and TLG, and it has excellent interobserver agreement.
Collapse
|
115
|
Berberoğlu K. Use of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Radiation Treatment Planning for Lung Cancer. Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther 2016; 25:50-62. [PMID: 27277321 PMCID: PMC5096621 DOI: 10.4274/mirt.19870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) plays an important role in the treatment of lung cancer. Accurate diagnosis and staging are crucial in the delivery of RT with curative intent. Target miss can be prevented by accurate determination of tumor contours during RT planning. Currently, tumor contours are determined manually by computed tomography (CT) during RT planning. This method leads to differences in delineation of tumor volume between users. Given the change in RT tools and methods due to rapidly developing technology, it is now more significant to accurately delineate the tumor tissue. F18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT (F18 FDG PET/CT) has been established as an accurate method in correctly staging and detecting tumor dissemination in lung cancer. Since it provides both anatomic and biologic information, F18 FDG PET decreases inter-user variability in tumor delineation. For instance, tumor volumes may be decreased as atelectasis and malignant tissue can be more accurately differentiated, as well as better evaluation of benign and malignant lymph nodes given the difference in FDG uptake. Using F18 FDG PET/CT, the radiation dose can be escalated without serious adverse effects in lung cancer. In this study, we evaluated the contribution of F18 FDG PET/CT for RT planning in lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kezban Berberoğlu
- Anadolu Medical Center, Clinic of Nuclear Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey, Phone: +90 532 584 62 56 E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
116
|
van Rossum PSN, Xu C, Fried DV, Goense L, Court LE, Lin SH. The emerging field of radiomics in esophageal cancer: current evidence and future potential. Transl Cancer Res 2016; 5:410-423. [PMID: 30687593 DOI: 10.21037/tcr.2016.06.19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
'Radiomics' is the name given to the emerging field of extracting additional information from standard medical images using advanced feature analysis. This innovative form of quantitative image analysis appears to have future potential for clinical practice in patients with esophageal cancer by providing an additional layer of information to the standard imaging assessment. There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that radiomics may provide incremental value for staging, predicting treatment response, and predicting survival in esophageal cancer, for which the current work-up has substantial limitations. This review outlines the available evidence and future potential for the application of radiomics in the management of patients with esophageal cancer. In addition, an overview of the current evidence on the importance of reproducibility of image features and the substantial influence of varying smoothing scales, quantization levels, and segmentation methods is provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter S N van Rossum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Texas), USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cai Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Texas), USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital & Institute, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing 100021, China
| | - David V Fried
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (North Carolina), USA
| | - Lucas Goense
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Laurence E Court
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Texas), USA
| | - Steven H Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Texas), USA
| |
Collapse
|
117
|
Functional volumetric analysis of striatum using F-18 FP-CIT PET in patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease and normal subjects. Ann Nucl Med 2016; 30:572-8. [PMID: 27283185 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-016-1096-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2016] [Accepted: 06/03/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We applied a simple isocontour volume-of-interest (VOI) method to analyze the whole striatum in an F-18 FP-CIT PET image and to investigate the usefulness of the method in differentiating healthy subjects from idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD) patients and the correlation of the value of functional volume parameters with the motor symptoms in patients with IPD. METHODS Forty-three IPD patients and 23 age-matched healthy controls underwent F-18 FP-CIT PET. Using a dedicated workstation, VOIs for the whole striatum were drawn automatically with the gradient delineation method. The SUVmax, SUVmean, functional volume (FV), striatal volume activity (SVA), striatal-specific binding (SSB), and volume-specific uptake ratio (VSUR) were compared between the IPD patients and the normal subjects. In the IPD patients, the correlation between the clinical factor and the functional parameters was assessed. RESULTS The SUVmax, SUVmean, FV, SVA, SSB, and VSUR were significantly lower in the IPD patients than in the normal subjects. In the receiver operating characteristic analysis, those parameters had significant and good-to-excellent accuracy. In the patients with IPD, a moderate negative correlation was revealed between the SUVmax and H&Y stage, the SUVmean and H&Y stage, SVA and H&Y stage, the VSUR and H&Y stage, the FV and bradykinesia, and the SVA and bradykinesia. CONCLUSION The functional volumetric analysis of the striatum based on simple isocontour VOI was a useful method of analyzing the F-18 FP-CIT PET image. Not only can it be easily applied in daily clinical practice, but it can also be used as a clinical parameter to discriminate IPD and to correlate it with the disease severity.
Collapse
|
118
|
Quantification of metabolic tumor activity and burden in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: Is manual adjustment of semiautomatic gradient-based measurements necessary? Nucl Med Commun 2016; 36:782-9. [PMID: 25888358 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000000317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Metabolic tumor burden (MTB) measurements including metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis have been shown to have prognostic value in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The calculation of MTB typically utilizes software to semiautomatically draw volumes of interest around the tumor, which are subsequently manually adjusted by the radiologist to include the entire tumor. The manual adjustment step can be time-consuming and observer-dependent. We compared the agreement of MTB values obtained using the semiautomatic method with and without manual adjustment in NSCLC patients. METHODS This IRB-approved prospective study included 134 patients with histologically proven NSCLC who underwent fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography. The MTB of the primary tumor was measured with a semiautomatic gradient-based method without manual adjustment (the semiautomatic gradient method) and with manual adjustment (the manually adjusted semiautomatic gradient method) by two radiologists using the MIM PETedge tool. The paired t-test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) were calculated to evaluate the agreement between MTB measures obtained with these two methods, as well as agreement between the two radiologists for each method. RESULTS Maximum standardized uptake value was identical between the two methods. No statistically significant difference was present for peak standardized uptake value, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis values between the two methods (P=0.23, 0.45, and 0.37, respectively). Excellent agreement between the two methods was found in terms of CCC (CCC>0.98 for all measures). Interobserver reliability was excellent for all measures (CCC>0.90). CONCLUSION The semiautomatic gradient-based tumor-segmentation method can be used without the additional manual adjustment step for MTB quantification of primary NSCLC tumors.
Collapse
|
119
|
Impact of point spread function reconstruction on quantitative 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging parameters and inter-reader reproducibility in solid tumors. Nucl Med Commun 2016; 37:288-96. [DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000000445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
|
120
|
Update on F-18-fluoro-deoxy-glucose-PET/computed tomography in nonsmall cell lung cancer. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2016; 21:314-21. [PMID: 25978629 DOI: 10.1097/mcp.0000000000000182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The aim of this review is to provide an outline of current evidence for the use of F-18-fluoro-deoxy-glucose PET computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for diagnosis, staging, radiotherapy planning, response assessment and response monitoring. RECENT FINDINGS Management of patients with NSCLC requires a multimodality approach to accurately diagnose and stage patients. In this approach, FDG-PET/CT has become a standard staging instrument in lung cancer. FDG-PET/CT is, in addition to staging, also valuable for the characterization of the solitary pulmonary nodule. An increased uptake in the nodule as compared with mediastinal blood pool is suspected for malignancy. In radiotherapy planning, FDG-PET/CT can assist the radiation oncologist for optimal dose delivery to the tumour, while sparing healthy tissues. Evidence of the prognostic and predictive implications of FDG-PET/CT is accumulating. Volumetric parameters of PET, such as metabolic active tumour volume and total lesion glycolysis, are promising predictive and prognostic biomarkers. However, for implementation of metabolic response parameters in clinical practice, more randomized, PET-based, multicentre trials are necessary. The introduction of integrated PET and MRI scanners did not change the pivotal role of standard FDG-PET/CT yet, as with current technology, PET/MRI did not show superior performance in thoracic staging. SUMMARY The role of PET is described for diagnosis, staging and response assessment.
Collapse
|
121
|
Intratumoral heterogeneity of (18)F-FDG uptake predicts survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2016; 43:1461-8. [PMID: 26872788 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-016-3316-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2015] [Accepted: 01/12/2016] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess whether intratumoral heterogeneity measured by (18)F-FDG PET texture analysis has potential as a prognostic imaging biomarker in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS We evaluated a cohort of 137 patients with newly diagnosed PDAC who underwent pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT from January 2008 to December 2010. First-order (histogram indices) and higher-order (grey-level run length, difference, size zone matrices) textural features of primary tumours were extracted by PET texture analysis. Conventional PET parameters including metabolic tumour volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and standardized uptake value (SUV) were also measured. To assess and compare the predictive performance of imaging biomarkers, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for censored survival data and areas under the ROC curve (AUC) at 2 years after diagnosis were used. Associations between imaging biomarkers and overall survival were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS The best imaging biomarker for overall survival prediction was first-order entropy (AUC = 0.720), followed by TLG (AUC = 0.697), MTV (AUC = 0.692), and maximum SUV (AUC = 0.625). After adjusting for age, sex, clinical stage, tumour size and serum CA19-9 level, multivariable Cox analysis demonstrated that higher entropy (hazard ratio, HR, 5.59; P = 0.028) was independently associated with worse survival, whereas TLG (HR 0.98; P = 0.875) was not an independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSION Intratumoral heterogeneity of (18)F-FDG uptake measured by PET texture analysis is an independent predictor of survival along with tumour stage and serum CA19-9 level in patients with PDAC. In addition, first-order entropy as a measure of intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity is a better quantitative imaging biomarker of prognosis than conventional PET parameters.
Collapse
|
122
|
Ohri N, Duan F, Snyder BS, Wei B, Machtay M, Alavi A, Siegel BA, Johnson DW, Bradley JD, DeNittis A, Werner-Wasik M, El Naqa I. Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET Textural Features in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Secondary Analysis of ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235. J Nucl Med 2016; 57:842-8. [PMID: 26912429 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.166934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2015] [Accepted: 01/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED In a secondary analysis of American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) 6668/RTOG 0235, high pretreatment metabolic tumor volume (MTV) on (18)F-FDG PET was found to be a poor prognostic factor for patients treated with chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here we utilize the same dataset to explore whether heterogeneity metrics based on PET textural features can provide additional prognostic information. METHODS Patients with locally advanced NSCLC underwent (18)F-FDG PET prior to treatment. A gradient-based segmentation tool was used to contour each patient's primary tumor. MTV, maximum SUV, and 43 textural features were extracted for each tumor. To address overfitting and high collinearity among PET features, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method was applied to identify features that were independent predictors of overall survival (OS) after adjusting for MTV. Recursive binary partitioning in a conditional inference framework was utilized to identify optimal thresholds. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank testing were used to compare outcomes among patient groups. RESULTS Two hundred one patients met inclusion criteria. The LASSO procedure identified 1 textural feature (SumMean) as an independent predictor of OS. The optimal cutpoint for MTV was 93.3 cm(3), and the optimal SumMean cutpoint for tumors above 93.3 cm(3) was 0.018. This grouped patients into three categories: low tumor MTV (n = 155; median OS, 22.6 mo), high tumor MTV and high SumMean (n = 23; median OS, 20.0 mo), and high tumor MTV and low SumMean (n = 23; median OS, 6.2 mo; log-rank P < 0.001). CONCLUSION We have described an appropriate methodology to evaluate the prognostic value of textural PET features in the context of established prognostic factors. We have also identified a promising feature that may have prognostic value in locally advanced NSCLC patients with large tumors who are treated with chemoradiotherapy. Validation studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nitin Ohri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Fenghai Duan
- Department of Biostatistics and Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Bradley S Snyder
- Department of Biostatistics and Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Bo Wei
- Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Mitchell Machtay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Abass Alavi
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Barry A Siegel
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology and the Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Douglas W Johnson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baptist Cancer Institute, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Jeffrey D Bradley
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology and the Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Albert DeNittis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lankenau Hospital and Lankenau Institute for Medical Research, Lower Merion, Pennsylvania
| | - Maria Werner-Wasik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Issam El Naqa
- University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
123
|
Minamimoto R, Fayad L, Advani R, Vose J, Macapinlac H, Meza J, Hankins J, Mottaghy F, Juweid M, Quon A. Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Prospective Multicenter Comparison of Early Interim FLT PET/CT versus FDG PET/CT with IHP, EORTC, Deauville, and PERCIST Criteria for Early Therapeutic Monitoring. Radiology 2016; 280:220-9. [PMID: 26854705 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015150689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To compare the performance characteristics of interim fluorine 18 ((18)F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) (after two cycles of chemotherapy) by using the most prominent standardized interpretive criteria (including International Harmonization Project [IHP] criteria, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] criteria, and PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) versus those of interim (18)F fluorothymidine (FLT) PET/CT and simple visual interpretation. Materials and Methods This HIPAA-compliant prospective study was approved by the institutional review boards, and written informed consent was obtained. Patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) underwent both FLT and FDG PET/CT 18-24 days after two cycles of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone or rituximab, etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin. For FDG PET/CT interpretation, IHP criteria, EORTC criteria, PERCIST, Deauville criteria, standardized uptake value, total lesion glycolysis, and metabolic tumor volume were used. FLT PET/CT images were interpreted with visual assessment by two reviewers in consensus. The interim (after cycle 2) FDG and FLT PET/CT studies were then compared with the end-of-treatment FDG PET/CT studies to determine which interim examination and/or criteria best predicted the result after six cycles of chemotherapy. Results From November 2011 to May 2014, there were 60 potential patients for inclusion, of whom 46 patients (24 men [mean age, 60.9 years ± 13.7; range, 28-78 years] and 22 women [mean age, 57.2 years ± 13.4; range, 25-76 years]) fulfilled the criteria. Thirty-four patients had complete response, and 12 had residual disease at the end of treatment. FLT PET/CT had a significantly higher positive predictive value (PPV) (91%) in predicting residual disease than did any FDG PET/CT interpretation method (42%-46%). No difference in negative predictive value (NPV) was found between FLT PET/CT (94%) and FDG PET/CT (82%-95%), regardless of the interpretive criteria used. FLT PET/CT showed statistically higher (P < .001-.008) or similar NPVs than did FDG PET/CT. Conclusion Early interim FLT PET/CT had a significantly higher PPV than standardized FDG PET/CT-based interpretation for therapeutic response assessment in DLBCL. (©) RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryogo Minamimoto
- From the Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, and Department of Medical Oncology (R.A.), Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305-5281 (R.M., A.Q.); Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (R.M.); Departments of Lymphoma/Myeloma (L.F.) and Nuclear Medicine (H.M.), the University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Oncology/Hematology Section (J.V.) and Department of Radiology (J.H.), University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Neb; Department of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Public Health, Omaha, Neb (J.M.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Aachen, Aachen, Germany (F.M.); and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan (M.J.)
| | - Luis Fayad
- From the Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, and Department of Medical Oncology (R.A.), Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305-5281 (R.M., A.Q.); Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (R.M.); Departments of Lymphoma/Myeloma (L.F.) and Nuclear Medicine (H.M.), the University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Oncology/Hematology Section (J.V.) and Department of Radiology (J.H.), University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Neb; Department of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Public Health, Omaha, Neb (J.M.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Aachen, Aachen, Germany (F.M.); and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan (M.J.)
| | - Ranjana Advani
- From the Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, and Department of Medical Oncology (R.A.), Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305-5281 (R.M., A.Q.); Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (R.M.); Departments of Lymphoma/Myeloma (L.F.) and Nuclear Medicine (H.M.), the University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Oncology/Hematology Section (J.V.) and Department of Radiology (J.H.), University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Neb; Department of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Public Health, Omaha, Neb (J.M.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Aachen, Aachen, Germany (F.M.); and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan (M.J.)
| | - Julie Vose
- From the Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, and Department of Medical Oncology (R.A.), Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305-5281 (R.M., A.Q.); Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (R.M.); Departments of Lymphoma/Myeloma (L.F.) and Nuclear Medicine (H.M.), the University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Oncology/Hematology Section (J.V.) and Department of Radiology (J.H.), University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Neb; Department of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Public Health, Omaha, Neb (J.M.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Aachen, Aachen, Germany (F.M.); and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan (M.J.)
| | - Homer Macapinlac
- From the Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, and Department of Medical Oncology (R.A.), Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305-5281 (R.M., A.Q.); Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (R.M.); Departments of Lymphoma/Myeloma (L.F.) and Nuclear Medicine (H.M.), the University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Oncology/Hematology Section (J.V.) and Department of Radiology (J.H.), University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Neb; Department of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Public Health, Omaha, Neb (J.M.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Aachen, Aachen, Germany (F.M.); and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan (M.J.)
| | - Jane Meza
- From the Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, and Department of Medical Oncology (R.A.), Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305-5281 (R.M., A.Q.); Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (R.M.); Departments of Lymphoma/Myeloma (L.F.) and Nuclear Medicine (H.M.), the University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Oncology/Hematology Section (J.V.) and Department of Radiology (J.H.), University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Neb; Department of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Public Health, Omaha, Neb (J.M.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Aachen, Aachen, Germany (F.M.); and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan (M.J.)
| | - Jordan Hankins
- From the Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, and Department of Medical Oncology (R.A.), Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305-5281 (R.M., A.Q.); Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (R.M.); Departments of Lymphoma/Myeloma (L.F.) and Nuclear Medicine (H.M.), the University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Oncology/Hematology Section (J.V.) and Department of Radiology (J.H.), University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Neb; Department of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Public Health, Omaha, Neb (J.M.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Aachen, Aachen, Germany (F.M.); and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan (M.J.)
| | - Felix Mottaghy
- From the Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, and Department of Medical Oncology (R.A.), Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305-5281 (R.M., A.Q.); Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (R.M.); Departments of Lymphoma/Myeloma (L.F.) and Nuclear Medicine (H.M.), the University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Oncology/Hematology Section (J.V.) and Department of Radiology (J.H.), University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Neb; Department of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Public Health, Omaha, Neb (J.M.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Aachen, Aachen, Germany (F.M.); and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan (M.J.)
| | - Malik Juweid
- From the Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, and Department of Medical Oncology (R.A.), Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305-5281 (R.M., A.Q.); Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (R.M.); Departments of Lymphoma/Myeloma (L.F.) and Nuclear Medicine (H.M.), the University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Oncology/Hematology Section (J.V.) and Department of Radiology (J.H.), University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Neb; Department of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Public Health, Omaha, Neb (J.M.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Aachen, Aachen, Germany (F.M.); and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan (M.J.)
| | - Andrew Quon
- From the Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, and Department of Medical Oncology (R.A.), Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305-5281 (R.M., A.Q.); Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (R.M.); Departments of Lymphoma/Myeloma (L.F.) and Nuclear Medicine (H.M.), the University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Oncology/Hematology Section (J.V.) and Department of Radiology (J.H.), University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Neb; Department of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Public Health, Omaha, Neb (J.M.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Aachen, Aachen, Germany (F.M.); and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan (M.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
124
|
van Rossum PSN, Fried DV, Zhang L, Hofstetter WL, van Vulpen M, Meijer GJ, Court LE, Lin SH. The Incremental Value of Subjective and Quantitative Assessment of 18F-FDG PET for the Prediction of Pathologic Complete Response to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer. J Nucl Med 2016; 57:691-700. [PMID: 26795288 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.163766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2015] [Accepted: 12/07/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED A reliable prediction of a pathologic complete response (pathCR) to chemoradiotherapy before surgery for esophageal cancer would enable investigators to study the feasibility and outcome of an organ-preserving strategy after chemoradiotherapy. So far no clinical parameters or diagnostic studies are able to accurately predict which patients will achieve a pathCR. The aim of this study was to determine whether subjective and quantitative assessment of baseline and postchemoradiation (18)F-FDG PET can improve the accuracy of predicting pathCR to preoperative chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer beyond clinical predictors. METHODS This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and the need for written informed consent was waived. Clinical parameters along with subjective and quantitative parameters from baseline and postchemoradiation (18)F-FDG PET were derived from 217 esophageal adenocarcinoma patients who underwent chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. The associations between these parameters and pathCR were studied in univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis. Four prediction models were constructed and internally validated using bootstrapping to study the incremental predictive values of subjective assessment of (18)F-FDG PET, conventional quantitative metabolic features, and comprehensive (18)F-FDG PET texture/geometry features, respectively. The clinical benefit of (18)F-FDG PET was determined using decision-curve analysis. RESULTS A pathCR was found in 59 (27%) patients. A clinical prediction model (corrected c-index, 0.67) was improved by adding (18)F-FDG PET-based subjective assessment of response (corrected c-index, 0.72). This latter model was slightly improved by the addition of 1 conventional quantitative metabolic feature only (i.e., postchemoradiation total lesion glycolysis; corrected c-index, 0.73), and even more by subsequently adding 4 comprehensive (18)F-FDG PET texture/geometry features (corrected c-index, 0.77). However, at a decision threshold of 0.9 or higher, representing a clinically relevant predictive value for pathCR at which one may be willing to omit surgery, there was no clear incremental value. CONCLUSION Subjective and quantitative assessment of (18)F-FDG PET provides statistical incremental value for predicting pathCR after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer. However, the discriminatory improvement beyond clinical predictors does not translate into a clinically relevant benefit that could change decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter S N van Rossum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - David V Fried
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston, Houston, Texas; and
| | - Lifei Zhang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Wayne L Hofstetter
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Marco van Vulpen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Gert J Meijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Laurence E Court
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Steven H Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
125
|
Jun S, Kim H, Nam HY. A new method for segmentation of FDG PET metabolic tumour volume using the peritumoural halo layer and a 10-step colour scale. A study in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma. Nuklearmedizin 2015; 54:272-85. [PMID: 26429587 DOI: 10.3413/nukmed-0749-15-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2015] [Accepted: 09/22/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
AIM We observed a layer between tumour activity and background on FDG PET/CT with the 10-step colour scale and the window level set properly. We named the layer peritumoral halo layer (PHL). We performed this study to establish the reliability of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) segmentation using PHL (MTV(PHL)) in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma. PATIENTS, METHODS Of a total of 140 papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) patients, 70 (50.0%) had FDG-avid PTC. In these patients, MTV(PHL), MTV segmented according to fixed 50% SUVmax (MTV(50%)), and fixed SUV with 2.5 to 4.0 (MTV(2.5) to MTV(4.0)) were compared with pathologic tumour volume (PTV). The absolute percentage difference between MTV(PHL) and PTV was compared in micropapillary carcinoma (MPTC) and non-micropapillary carcinoma (non-MPTC) subgroups. The % SUVmax and SUV thresholds of MTV(PHL) were compared with tumour SUVmax. RESULTS Among the MTVs, MTV(50%) was not correlated with PTV (r = -0.16, p = 0.182) and was not reliable according to the Bland-Altman plot. Although MTV(2.5), MTV(3.0), MTV(3.5), and MTV(4.0) correlated with PTV (r = 0.85, 0.86, 0.87, and 0.87, respectively; p < 0.001), these MTVs were not reliable on Bland-Altman analyses. MTV(PHL) was significantly correlated with PTV (r = 0.80, p < 0.001), and the Bland-Altman plot did not show systemic error. The MTV(PHL) was more accurate in non-MPTC than in MPTC (p < 0.001), and the absolute % difference was smaller as PTV became larger (σ = -0.65, p < 0.001). The MTV(PHL) thresholds had correlations with SUVmax (% SUVmax threshold: σ = -0.87, p < 0.001; SUV threshold: r = 0.88, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS MTV(PHL) was more reliable than MTV(%SUVmax) or MTV(SUV). The reliability of MTV(PHL) improved with larger PTVs. The threshold of the MTV(PHL) was naturally altered by PHL according to SUVmax.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - H-Y Nam
- Hyun-Yeol Nam, M.D., Samsung Changwon Hospital, 158, Paryong-ro, Masan Hoewon-gu, Changwon-si, Korea, 630-723, Tel. +82/55/290-65 93; Fax -55 98,
| |
Collapse
|
126
|
Tumour delineation in oesophageal cancer - A prospective study of delineation in PET and CT with and without endoscopically placed clip markers. Radiother Oncol 2015; 116:269-75. [PMID: 26364886 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2014] [Revised: 06/12/2015] [Accepted: 07/16/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective was to analyse the value of F-18-fluorodesoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for delineation of the Gross Tumour Volumes (GTVs) in primary radiotherapy of oesophageal cancer. METHOD 20 consecutive and prospective patients (13 men, 7 women) underwent FDG-PET/CT for initial staging and radiation treatment planning. After endoscopy-guided clipping of the tumour another CT study was acquired. The CT and the FDG-PET/CT were registered with a rigid and a non-rigid registration algorithm to compare the overlap between GTV contours defined with the following methods: manual GTV definition in (1) the CT image of the FDG-PET/CT, (2) the PET image of the FDG-PET/CT, (3) the CT study based on endoscopic clips (CT clip), and (4) in the PET-data using different semi-automatic PET segmentation algorithms including a gradient-based algorithm. The absolute tumour volumes, tumour length in cranio-caudal direction, as well as the overlap with the reference volume (CT-clip) were compared for all lesions and separately for proximal/distal tumours. RESULTS In 6 of the patients, FDG-PET/CT discovered previously unknown tumour locations, which resulted in either altered target volumes (n=3) or altered intent of treatment from curative to palliative (n=3) by upstaging to stage IV. For tumour segmentation a large variability between all algorithms was found. For the absolute tumour volumes with CT-clip as reference, no single PET-based segmentation algorithm performed better compared to using the manual CT delineation alone. The best correlation was found between the CT-clip and the gradient based segmentation algorithm (PET-edge, R(2)=0.84) as well as the manual CT-delineation (CT-manual R(2)=0.89). Non-rigid registration between CT and image FDG-PET/CT did not decrease variability between segmentation methods compared to rigid registration statistically significant. For the analysis of tumour length no homogeneous correlation was found. CONCLUSION Whereas FDG-PET was highly relevant for staging purposes, CT imaging with clipping of the tumour extension remains the gold standard for GTV delineation.
Collapse
|
127
|
Fried DV, Mawlawi O, Zhang L, Fave X, Zhou S, Ibbott G, Liao Z, Court LE. Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Prognostic Value of FDG PET Quantitative Imaging Features Combined with Clinical Prognostic Factors. Radiology 2015; 278:214-22. [PMID: 26176655 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015142920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine whether quantitative imaging features from pretreatment positron emission tomography (PET) can enhance patient overall survival risk stratification beyond what can be achieved with conventional prognostic factors in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS The institutional review board approved this retrospective chart review study and waived the requirement to obtain informed consent. The authors retrospectively identified 195 patients with stage III NSCLC treated definitively with radiation therapy between January 2008 and January 2013. All patients underwent pretreatment PET/computed tomography before treatment. Conventional PET metrics, along with histogram, shape and volume, and co-occurrence matrix features, were extracted. Linear predictors of overall survival were developed from leave-one-out cross-validation. Predictive Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare the linear predictors with both quantitative imaging features and conventional prognostic factors to those generated with conventional prognostic factors alone. The Harrell concordance index was used to quantify the discriminatory power of the linear predictors for survival differences of at least 0, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Models were generated with features present in more than 50% of the cross-validation folds. RESULTS Linear predictors of overall survival generated with both quantitative imaging features and conventional prognostic factors demonstrated improved risk stratification compared with those generated with conventional prognostic factors alone in terms of log-rank statistic (P = .18 vs P = .0001, respectively) and concordance index (0.62 vs 0.58, respectively). The use of quantitative imaging features selected during cross-validation improved the model using conventional prognostic factors alone (P = .007). Disease solidity and primary tumor energy from the co-occurrence matrix were found to be selected in all folds of cross-validation. CONCLUSION Pretreatment PET features were associated with overall survival when adjusting for conventional prognostic factors in patients with stage III NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David V Fried
- From the Departments of Radiation Physics (D.V.F., O.M., L.Z., X.F., G.I., L.E.C.), Imaging Physics (O.M.), Biostatistics (S.Z.), and Radiation Oncology (Z.L.), the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030; and Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex (D.V.F., X.F., G.I., L.E.C.)
| | - Osama Mawlawi
- From the Departments of Radiation Physics (D.V.F., O.M., L.Z., X.F., G.I., L.E.C.), Imaging Physics (O.M.), Biostatistics (S.Z.), and Radiation Oncology (Z.L.), the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030; and Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex (D.V.F., X.F., G.I., L.E.C.)
| | - Lifei Zhang
- From the Departments of Radiation Physics (D.V.F., O.M., L.Z., X.F., G.I., L.E.C.), Imaging Physics (O.M.), Biostatistics (S.Z.), and Radiation Oncology (Z.L.), the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030; and Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex (D.V.F., X.F., G.I., L.E.C.)
| | - Xenia Fave
- From the Departments of Radiation Physics (D.V.F., O.M., L.Z., X.F., G.I., L.E.C.), Imaging Physics (O.M.), Biostatistics (S.Z.), and Radiation Oncology (Z.L.), the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030; and Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex (D.V.F., X.F., G.I., L.E.C.)
| | - Shouhao Zhou
- From the Departments of Radiation Physics (D.V.F., O.M., L.Z., X.F., G.I., L.E.C.), Imaging Physics (O.M.), Biostatistics (S.Z.), and Radiation Oncology (Z.L.), the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030; and Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex (D.V.F., X.F., G.I., L.E.C.)
| | - Geoffrey Ibbott
- From the Departments of Radiation Physics (D.V.F., O.M., L.Z., X.F., G.I., L.E.C.), Imaging Physics (O.M.), Biostatistics (S.Z.), and Radiation Oncology (Z.L.), the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030; and Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex (D.V.F., X.F., G.I., L.E.C.)
| | - Zhongxing Liao
- From the Departments of Radiation Physics (D.V.F., O.M., L.Z., X.F., G.I., L.E.C.), Imaging Physics (O.M.), Biostatistics (S.Z.), and Radiation Oncology (Z.L.), the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030; and Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex (D.V.F., X.F., G.I., L.E.C.)
| | - Laurence E Court
- From the Departments of Radiation Physics (D.V.F., O.M., L.Z., X.F., G.I., L.E.C.), Imaging Physics (O.M.), Biostatistics (S.Z.), and Radiation Oncology (Z.L.), the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030; and Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex (D.V.F., X.F., G.I., L.E.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
128
|
Abstract
PET imaging has contributed substantially in oncology by allowing improved clinical staging and guiding appropriate cancer management. Integration with radiotherapy planning via PET/computed tomography (CT) simulation enables improved target delineation, which is paramount for conformal radiotherapy techniques. This article reviews the present literature regarding implications of PET/CT for radiotherapy planning and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beant S Gill
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, 5230 Centre Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA
| | - Sarah S Pai
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - Stacey McKenzie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, 5230 Centre Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA
| | - Sushil Beriwal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, 5230 Centre Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
129
|
PET/CT imaging for target volume delineation in curative intent radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer: IAEA consensus report 2014. Radiother Oncol 2015; 116:27-34. [PMID: 25869338 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2014] [Revised: 03/09/2015] [Accepted: 03/15/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
This document describes best practice and evidence based recommendations for the use of FDG-PET/CT for the purposes of radiotherapy target volume delineation (TVD) for curative intent treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These recommendations have been written by an expert advisory group, convened by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to facilitate a Coordinated Research Project (CRP) aiming to improve the applications of PET based radiation treatment planning (RTP) in low and middle income countries. These guidelines can be applied in routine clinical practice of radiotherapy TVD, for NSCLC patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation or radiotherapy alone, where FDG is used, and where a calibrated PET camera system equipped for RTP patient positioning is available. Recommendations are provided for PET and CT image visualization and interpretation, and for tumor delineation using planning CT with and without breathing motion compensation.
Collapse
|
130
|
Thorwarth D. Functional imaging for radiotherapy treatment planning: current status and future directions-a review. Br J Radiol 2015; 88:20150056. [PMID: 25827209 PMCID: PMC4628531 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent years, radiotherapy (RT) has been subject to a number of technological innovations. Today, RT is extremely flexible, allowing irradiation of tumours with high doses, whilst also sparing normal tissues from doses. To make use of these additional degrees of freedom, integration of functional image information may play a key role (i) for better staging and tumour detection, (ii) for more accurate RT target volume delineation, (iii) to assess functional information about biological characteristics and individual radiation resistance and (iv) to apply personalized dose prescriptions. In this article, we discuss the current status and future directions of different clinically available functional imaging modalities; CT, MRI, positron emission tomography (PET) as well as the hybrid imaging techniques PET/CT and PET/MRI and their potential for individualized RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Thorwarth
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
131
|
Ohri N, Duan F, Machtay M, Gorelick JJ, Snyder BS, Alavi A, Siegel BA, Johnson DW, Bradley JD, DeNittis A, Werner-Wasik M. Pretreatment FDG-PET metrics in stage III non-small cell lung cancer: ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015; 107:djv004. [PMID: 25688115 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djv004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235 evaluated the prognostic value of positron emission tomography with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) uptake before and after definitive, concurrent, platinum-based chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this secondary analysis, we evaluate volumetric pretreatment PET measures as predictors of clinical outcomes. METHODS Patients with stage III NSCLC underwent FDG-PET prior to treatment. A commercially available gradient-based segmentation tool was used to contour all visible hypermetabolic lesions on each scan. For each patient, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total glycolytic activity (TGA) for all contoured lesions were recorded. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate clinical variables and PET metrics as predictors of overall survival (OS) and locoregional control (LRC). Time-dependent covariables were added to the models when necessary to address nonproportional hazards. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS Complete data were available for 214 patients in the OS analysis and 189 subjects in the LRC analysis. In multivariable analysis incorporating clinical and imaging data available prior to treatment, MTV was an independent predictor of OS (HR = 1.04 per 10 cm(3) increase, 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.06, P < .001). High MTV was also associated with increased risk of locoregional failure at baseline (HR = 1.16 per 10 cm(3) increase, 95% CI = 1.08 to 1.23, P < .001) and at six months (HR = 1.05 per 10 cm(3) increase, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.07, P < .001) but not at 12 months or later time points. CONCLUSION Pretreatment MTV is a predictor of clinical outcomes for NSCLC patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. Quantitative PET measures may serve as stratification factors in clinical trials for this patient population and may help guide novel trial designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nitin Ohri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (NO); Department of Biostatistics and Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI (FD, JJG, BSS); Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (MM); Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (AA); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (BAS); Baptist Cancer Institute, Jacksonville, FL (DWJ); Department of Radiation Oncology and the Alvin J Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (JDB); Lankenau Medical Center and Lankenau Institute for Medical Research, Lower Merion, PA (AD); Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (MWW).
| | - Fenghai Duan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (NO); Department of Biostatistics and Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI (FD, JJG, BSS); Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (MM); Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (AA); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (BAS); Baptist Cancer Institute, Jacksonville, FL (DWJ); Department of Radiation Oncology and the Alvin J Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (JDB); Lankenau Medical Center and Lankenau Institute for Medical Research, Lower Merion, PA (AD); Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (MWW)
| | - Mitchell Machtay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (NO); Department of Biostatistics and Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI (FD, JJG, BSS); Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (MM); Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (AA); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (BAS); Baptist Cancer Institute, Jacksonville, FL (DWJ); Department of Radiation Oncology and the Alvin J Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (JDB); Lankenau Medical Center and Lankenau Institute for Medical Research, Lower Merion, PA (AD); Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (MWW)
| | - Jeremy J Gorelick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (NO); Department of Biostatistics and Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI (FD, JJG, BSS); Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (MM); Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (AA); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (BAS); Baptist Cancer Institute, Jacksonville, FL (DWJ); Department of Radiation Oncology and the Alvin J Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (JDB); Lankenau Medical Center and Lankenau Institute for Medical Research, Lower Merion, PA (AD); Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (MWW)
| | - Bradley S Snyder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (NO); Department of Biostatistics and Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI (FD, JJG, BSS); Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (MM); Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (AA); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (BAS); Baptist Cancer Institute, Jacksonville, FL (DWJ); Department of Radiation Oncology and the Alvin J Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (JDB); Lankenau Medical Center and Lankenau Institute for Medical Research, Lower Merion, PA (AD); Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (MWW)
| | - Abass Alavi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (NO); Department of Biostatistics and Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI (FD, JJG, BSS); Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (MM); Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (AA); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (BAS); Baptist Cancer Institute, Jacksonville, FL (DWJ); Department of Radiation Oncology and the Alvin J Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (JDB); Lankenau Medical Center and Lankenau Institute for Medical Research, Lower Merion, PA (AD); Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (MWW)
| | - Barry A Siegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (NO); Department of Biostatistics and Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI (FD, JJG, BSS); Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (MM); Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (AA); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (BAS); Baptist Cancer Institute, Jacksonville, FL (DWJ); Department of Radiation Oncology and the Alvin J Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (JDB); Lankenau Medical Center and Lankenau Institute for Medical Research, Lower Merion, PA (AD); Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (MWW)
| | - Douglas W Johnson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (NO); Department of Biostatistics and Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI (FD, JJG, BSS); Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (MM); Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (AA); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (BAS); Baptist Cancer Institute, Jacksonville, FL (DWJ); Department of Radiation Oncology and the Alvin J Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (JDB); Lankenau Medical Center and Lankenau Institute for Medical Research, Lower Merion, PA (AD); Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (MWW)
| | - Jeffrey D Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (NO); Department of Biostatistics and Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI (FD, JJG, BSS); Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (MM); Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (AA); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (BAS); Baptist Cancer Institute, Jacksonville, FL (DWJ); Department of Radiation Oncology and the Alvin J Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (JDB); Lankenau Medical Center and Lankenau Institute for Medical Research, Lower Merion, PA (AD); Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (MWW)
| | - Albert DeNittis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (NO); Department of Biostatistics and Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI (FD, JJG, BSS); Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (MM); Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (AA); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (BAS); Baptist Cancer Institute, Jacksonville, FL (DWJ); Department of Radiation Oncology and the Alvin J Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (JDB); Lankenau Medical Center and Lankenau Institute for Medical Research, Lower Merion, PA (AD); Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (MWW)
| | - Maria Werner-Wasik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (NO); Department of Biostatistics and Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI (FD, JJG, BSS); Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (MM); Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (AA); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (BAS); Baptist Cancer Institute, Jacksonville, FL (DWJ); Department of Radiation Oncology and the Alvin J Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (JDB); Lankenau Medical Center and Lankenau Institute for Medical Research, Lower Merion, PA (AD); Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (MWW)
| |
Collapse
|
132
|
Zhang G, Han D, Ma C, Lu J, Sun T, Liu T, Zhu J, Zhou J, Yin Y. Gradient-based delineation of the primary GTV on FLT PET in squamous cell cancer of the thoracic esophagus and impact on radiotherapy planning. Radiat Oncol 2015; 10:11. [PMID: 25572431 PMCID: PMC4331414 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-014-0304-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2013] [Accepted: 12/15/2014] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background To validate a gradient-based segmentation method for gross tumor volume(GTV) delineation on 8F-fluorothymidine (FLT)positron emission tomography (PET)/ computer tomography (CT) in esophageal squamous cell cancer through pathologic specimen, in comparison with standardized uptake values (SUV) threshold-based methods and CT. The corresponding impact of this GTV delineation method on treatment planning was evaluated. Methods and materials Ten patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer were enrolled. Before radical surgery, all patients underwent FLT-PET/CT. GTVs were delineated by using four methods. GTVGRAD, GTV1.4 and GTV30%max were segmented on FLT PET using a gradient-based method, a fixed threshold of 1.4 SUV and 30% of SUVmax, respectively. GTVCT was based on CT data alone. The maximum longitudinal tumor length of each segmented GTV was compared with the measured tumor length of the pathologic gross tumor length (LPath). GTVGRAD, GTV1.4 and GTV30%max were compared with GTVCT by overlap index. Two radiotherapy plannings (planGRAD) and (planCT) were designed for each patient based on GTVGRAD and GTVCT. The dose-volume parameters for target volume and normal tissues, CI and HI of planGRAD and planCT were compared. Results The mean ± standard deviation of LPath was 6.47 ± 2.70 cm. The mean ± standard deviation of LGRAD,L1.4, L30%max and LCT were 6.22 ± 2.61, 6.23 ± 2.80, 5.95 ± 2.50,7.17 ± 2.28 cm, respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficients between LPath and each segmentation method were 0.989, 0.920, 0.920 and 0.862, respectively. The overlap indices of GTVGRAD, GTV1.4, GTV30%max when compared with GTVCT were 0.75 ± 0.12, 0.71 ± 0.12, 0.57 ± 0.10, respectively. The V5, V10, V20, V30 and mean dose of total-lung,V30 and mean dose of heart of planGRAD were significantly lower than planCT. Conclusions The gradient-based method provided the closest estimation of target length. The radiotherapy plannings based on the gradient-based segmentation method reduced the irradiated volume of lung, heart in comparison to CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guifang Zhang
- Department of Radiation Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong's Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Jiyan Road 440, Jinan, 250117, Shandong Province, P. R. China.
| | - Dali Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong's Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Jinan, China.
| | - Changsheng Ma
- Department of Radiation Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong's Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Jiyan Road 440, Jinan, 250117, Shandong Province, P. R. China.
| | - Jie Lu
- Department of Radiation Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong's Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Jiyan Road 440, Jinan, 250117, Shandong Province, P. R. China.
| | - Tao Sun
- Department of Radiation Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong's Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Jiyan Road 440, Jinan, 250117, Shandong Province, P. R. China.
| | - Tonghai Liu
- Department of Radiation Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong's Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Jiyan Road 440, Jinan, 250117, Shandong Province, P. R. China.
| | - Jian Zhu
- Department of Radiation Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong's Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Jiyan Road 440, Jinan, 250117, Shandong Province, P. R. China.
| | - Jingwei Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, 250117, Shandong Province, P. R. China.
| | - Yong Yin
- Department of Radiation Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong's Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Jiyan Road 440, Jinan, 250117, Shandong Province, P. R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
133
|
Gallamini A, Hutchings M, Borra A. Functional Imaging in Hodgkin Lymphoma. HODGKIN LYMPHOMA 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-12505-3_7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
134
|
Prognostic value of FDG PET metabolic tumor volume in human papillomavirus-positive stage III and IV oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 203:897-903. [PMID: 25247958 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.14.12497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to establish the prognostic utility in human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive stage III and IV oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the (18)F-FDG parameters maximal, mean, and peak standardized uptake value (SUVmax, SUVmean, and SUVpeak, respectively); metabolic tumor volume (MTV); and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). MATERIALS AND METHODS We included 70 patients in the present study who had a biopsy-proven HPV-positive (by in situ hybridization) stage III and IV oropharyngeal SCC and had a baseline PET/CT examination at our institution. Outcome endpoint was event-free survival (EFS), which included recurrence-free and overall survival. Cox proportional hazards multivariate regression analyses were performed. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. RESULTS In Cox regression proportional hazard univariate analysis, total MTV (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02; p = 0.008), primary-tumor MTV (HR, 1.02; p = 0.024), neck nodal MTV (HR, 1.03; p = 0.006), neck nodal TLG (HR, 1.01; p = 0.006), and neck node status (HR, 4.45; p = 0.03) showed a statistically significant association with EFS. There was no statistically significant association of EFS with SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak, and primary-tumor or overall TLG. In Cox regression proportional hazard multivariate model I, total MTV remained an independent prognostic marker for EFS when adjusted for every other variable individually in the model; in model II, primary-tumor MTV, neck node status, and SUVpeak are independent prognostic markers for EFS. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves using optimum cut point of 41 mL of total MTV were not significant (p = 0.09). CONCLUSION Total MTV and primary-tumor MTV are associated with survival outcomes in patients with HPV-positive stage III and IV oropharyngeal SCC.
Collapse
|
135
|
Ohri N, Piperdi B, Garg MK, Bodner WR, Gucalp R, Perez-Soler R, Keller SM, Guha C. Pre-treatment FDG-PET predicts the site of in-field progression following concurrent chemoradiotherapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2014; 87:23-7. [PMID: 25468149 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2014] [Revised: 10/02/2014] [Accepted: 10/27/2014] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Locoregional progression following definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is common. In this study, we explore the utility of pre-treatment PET for predicting sites of disease progression following CRT. METHODS We identified patients treated at our institution with definitive, concurrent CRT for stage III NSCLC in the years 2007-2010 who underwent staging FDG-PET/CT. Using a semiautomatic gradient-based tool, visible thoracic hypermetabolic lesions were contoured on each patient's pre-treatment PET. Post-treatment imaging was reviewed to identify specific locations of disease progression. Patients' maximum SUV (SUVmax_pat) and metabolic tumor volume (MTV_pat) were evaluated as predictors of clinical outcomes using logrank testing. Competing risks analysis was performed to examine the relationship between lesion (tumor or lymph node) MTV (MTV_les) and the risk of local disease progression. Patient death and progression in other sites were treated as competing risks. RESULTS 28 patients with 82 hypermetabolic lesions (27 pulmonary tumors, 55 lymph nodes) met inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 39.0 months for living patients. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.4 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 31.8 months. Low MTV_pat was associated with improved PFS (median 14.3 months for MTV<60 cc vs. 9.7 months for MTV>60 cc, p=0.039). MTV_les was strongly associated with the risk of local disease progression. The 2-year cumulative incidence rate (CIR) for progression in lesions larger than 25 cc was 45%, compared to 5% for lesions under 25 cc (p<0.001). CONCLUSION Pre-treatment PET can be used to identify specific lesions at high risk for treatment failure following definitive CRT for locally advanced NSCLC. Selective treatment intensification to high-risk lesions should be studied as a strategy to improve clinical outcomes in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nitin Ohri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 East 210th Street, Bronx, NY 10467, United States.
| | - Bilal Piperdi
- Department of Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 East 210th Street, Bronx, NY 10467, United States.
| | - Madhur K Garg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 East 210th Street, Bronx, NY 10467, United States.
| | - William R Bodner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 East 210th Street, Bronx, NY 10467, United States.
| | - Rasim Gucalp
- Department of Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 East 210th Street, Bronx, NY 10467, United States.
| | - Roman Perez-Soler
- Department of Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 East 210th Street, Bronx, NY 10467, United States.
| | - Steven M Keller
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 East 210th Street, Bronx, NY 10467-2490, United States.
| | - Chandan Guha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 East 210th Street, Bronx, NY 10467, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
136
|
Chi A, Nguyen NP. The utility of positron emission tomography in the treatment planning of image-guided radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Front Oncol 2014; 4:273. [PMID: 25340040 PMCID: PMC4187610 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2014.00273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2014] [Accepted: 09/20/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
In the thorax, the extent of tumor may be more accurately defined with the addition of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) to computed tomography (CT). This led to the increased utility of FDG-PET or PET/CT in the treatment planning of radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The inclusion of FDG-PET information in target volume delineation not only improves tumor localization but also decreases the amount of normal tissue included in the planning target volume (PTV) in selected patients. Therefore, it has a critical role in image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) for NSCLC. In this review, the impact of FDG-PET on target volume delineation in radiotherapy for NSCLC, which may increase the possibility of safe dose escalation with IGRT, the commonly used methods for tumor target volume delineation FDG-PET for NSCLC, and its impact on clinical outcome will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Chi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, West Virginia University , Morgantown, WV , USA
| | - Nam P Nguyen
- International Geriatric Radiotherapy Group , Tucson, AZ , USA
| |
Collapse
|
137
|
Marti-Fuster B, Esteban O, Thielemans K, Setoain X, Santos A, Ros D, Pavia J. Including anatomical and functional information in MC simulation of PET and SPECT brain studies. Brain-VISET: a voxel-based iterative method. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING 2014; 33:1931-1938. [PMID: 24876110 DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2014.2326041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Monte Carlo (MC) simulation provides a flexible and robust framework to efficiently evaluate and optimize image processing methods in emission tomography. In this work we present Brain-VISET (Voxel-based Iterative Simulation for Emission Tomography), a method that aims to simulate realistic [ (99m) Tc]-SPECT and [ (18) F]-PET brain databases by including anatomical and functional information. To this end, activity and attenuation maps generated using high-resolution anatomical images from patients were used as input maps in a MC projector to simulate SPECT or PET sinograms. The reconstructed images were compared with the corresponding real SPECT or PET studies in an iterative process where the activity inputs maps were being modified at each iteration. Datasets of 30 refractory epileptic patients were used to assess the new method. Each set consisted of structural images (MRI and CT) and functional studies (SPECT and PET), thereby allowing the inclusion of anatomical and functional variability in the simulation input models. SPECT and PET sinograms were obtained using the SimSET package and were reconstructed with the same protocols as those employed for the clinical studies. The convergence of Brain-VISET was evaluated by studying the behavior throughout iterations of the correlation coefficient, the quotient image histogram and a ROI analysis comparing simulated with real studies. The realism of generated maps was also evaluated. Our findings show that Brain-VISET is able to generate realistic SPECT and PET studies and that four iterations is a suitable number of iterations to guarantee a good agreement between simulated and real studies.
Collapse
|
138
|
|
139
|
Gallamini A, Zwarthoed C, Borra A. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology. Cancers (Basel) 2014; 6:1821-89. [PMID: 25268160 PMCID: PMC4276948 DOI: 10.3390/cancers6041821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 208] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2014] [Revised: 07/25/2014] [Accepted: 08/07/2014] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Since its introduction in the early nineties as a promising functional imaging technique in the management of neoplastic disorders, FDG-PET, and subsequently FDG-PET/CT, has become a cornerstone in several oncologic procedures such as tumor staging and restaging, treatment efficacy assessment during or after treatment end and radiotherapy planning. Moreover, the continuous technological progress of image generation and the introduction of sophisticated software to use PET scan as a biomarker paved the way to calculate new prognostic markers such as the metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and the total amount of tumor glycolysis (TLG). FDG-PET/CT proved more sensitive than contrast-enhanced CT scan in staging of several type of lymphoma or in detecting widespread tumor dissemination in several solid cancers, such as breast, lung, colon, ovary and head and neck carcinoma. As a consequence the stage of patients was upgraded, with a change of treatment in 10%-15% of them. One of the most evident advantages of FDG-PET was its ability to detect, very early during treatment, significant changes in glucose metabolism or even complete shutoff of the neoplastic cell metabolism as a surrogate of tumor chemosensitivity assessment. This could enable clinicians to detect much earlier the effectiveness of a given antineoplastic treatment, as compared to the traditional radiological detection of tumor shrinkage, which usually takes time and occurs much later.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Gallamini
- Department of Research and Medical Innovation, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, Nice University, Nice Cedex 2-06189 Nice, France.
| | - Colette Zwarthoed
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, Nice University, Nice Cedex 2-06189 Nice, France.
| | - Anna Borra
- Hematology Department S. Croce Hospital, Via M. Coppino 26, Cuneo 12100, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
140
|
Withofs N, Bernard C, Van der Rest C, Martinive P, Hatt M, Jodogne S, Visvikis D, Lee JA, Coucke PA, Hustinx R. FDG PET/CT for rectal carcinoma radiotherapy treatment planning: comparison of functional volume delineation algorithms and clinical challenges. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2014; 15:4696. [PMID: 25207560 PMCID: PMC5711099 DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i5.4696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2013] [Revised: 05/02/2014] [Accepted: 04/25/2014] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
PET/CT imaging could improve delineation of rectal carcinoma gross tumor volume (GTV) and reduce interobserver variability. The objective of this work was to compare various functional volume delineation algorithms. We enrolled 31 consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma. The FDG PET/CT and the high dose CT (CTRT) were performed in the radiation treatment position. For each patient, the anatomical GTVRT was delineated based on the CTRT and compared to six different functional/metabolic GTVPET derived from two automatic segmentation approaches (FLAB and a gradient-based method); a relative threshold (45% of the SUVmax) and an absolute threshold (SUV > 2.5), using two different commercially available software (Philips EBW4 and Segami OASIS). The spatial sizes and shapes of all volumes were compared using the conformity index (CI). All the delineated metabolic tumor volumes (MTVs) were significantly different. The MTVs were as follows (mean ± SD): GTVRT (40.6 ± 31.28ml); FLAB (21.36± 16.34 ml); the gradient-based method (18.97± 16.83ml); OASIS 45% (15.89 ± 12.68 ml); Philips 45% (14.52 ± 10.91 ml); OASIS 2.5 (41.6 2 ± 33.26 ml); Philips 2.5 (40 ± 31.27 ml). CI between these various volumes ranged from 0.40 to 0.90. The mean CI between the different MTVs and the GTVCT was < 0.4. Finally, the DICOM transfer of MTVs led to additional volume variations. In conclusion, we observed large and statistically significant variations in tumor volume delineation according to the segmentation algorithms and the software products. The manipulation of PET/CT images and MTVs, such as the DICOM transfer to the Radiation Oncology Department, induced additional volume variations.
Collapse
|
141
|
Thomas HMT, Balukrishna S, Devakumar D, Muthuswamy P, Samuel EJJ. Can positron emission tomography be more than a diagnostic tool? A survey on clinical practice among radiation oncologists in India. Indian J Cancer 2014; 51:145-9. [PMID: 25104197 DOI: 10.4103/0019-509x.138247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
AIM The purpose of the survey was to understand the role of positron emission tomography (PET) in clinical radiotherapy practice among the radiation oncologists' in India. SETTINGS AND DESIGN An online questionnaire was developed to survey the oncologists on their use of PET, viewing protocols, contouring techniques practiced, the barriers on the use of PET and the need for training in use of PET in radiotherapy. The questionnaire was sent to about 500 oncologists and 76 completed responses were received. RESULTS The survey shows that radiation oncologists use PET largely to assess treatment response and staging but limitedly use it for radiotherapy treatment planning. Only manual contouring and fixed threshold based delineation techniques (e.g. 40% maximum standard uptake value [SUV max ] or SUV 2.5) are used. Cost is the major barrier in the wider use of PET, followed by limited availability of FDG radionuclide tracer. Limited or no training was available for the use of PET. CONCLUSIONS Our survey revealed the vast difference between literature suggestions and actual clinical practice on the use of PET in radiotherapy. Additional training and standardization of protocols for use of PET in radiotherapy is essential for fully utilizing the capability of PET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H M T Thomas
- Photonics, Nuclear and Medical Physics Division, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
142
|
Shang C, Kasper M, Kathriarachchi V, Benda R, Kleinman J, Cole J, Williams T. Can an alternative backround-corrected [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) standard uptake value (SUV) be used for monitoring tumor local control following lung cancer stereotactic body radiosurgery? INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER THERAPY AND ONCOLOGY 2014. [DOI: 10.14319/ijcto.0203.17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
143
|
Altunbas C, Howells C, Proper M, Reddy K, Gan G, DeWitt P, Kavanagh B, Schefter T, Miften M. Evaluation of threshold and gradient based 18F-fluoro-deoxy-2-glucose hybrid positron emission tomographic image segmentation methods for liver tumor delineation. Pract Radiat Oncol 2014; 4:217-25. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2013.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2013] [Revised: 07/15/2013] [Accepted: 08/05/2013] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
144
|
van Elmpt W, Zegers CML, Das M, De Ruysscher D. Imaging techniques for tumour delineation and heterogeneity quantification of lung cancer: overview of current possibilities. J Thorac Dis 2014; 6:319-27. [PMID: 24688776 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.08.62] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2013] [Accepted: 08/21/2013] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Imaging techniques for the characterization and delineation of primary lung tumours and lymph nodes are a prerequisite for adequate radiotherapy. Numerous imaging modalities have been proposed for this purpose, but only computed tomography (CT) and FDG-PET have been implemented in clinical routine. Hypoxia PET, dynamic contrast-enhanced CT (DCE-CT), dual energy CT (DECT) and (functional) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) hold promise for the future. Besides information on the primary tumour, these techniques can be used for quantification of tissue heterogeneity and response. In the future, treatment strategies may be designed which are based on imaging techniques to optimize individual treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wouter van Elmpt
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), 2 Department of Radiology, GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands ; 3 Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Catharina M L Zegers
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), 2 Department of Radiology, GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands ; 3 Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marco Das
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), 2 Department of Radiology, GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands ; 3 Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dirk De Ruysscher
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), 2 Department of Radiology, GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands ; 3 Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
145
|
Obara P, Pu Y. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden in lung cancer. Chin J Cancer Res 2014; 25:615-22. [PMID: 24385688 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2013.11.10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2013] [Accepted: 11/29/2013] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Accurate prognosis in patients with lung cancer is important for clinical decision making and treatment selection. The TNM staging system is currently the main method for establishing prognosis. Using this system, patients are grouped into one of four stages based on primary tumor extent, nodal disease, and distant metastases. However, each stage represents a range of disease extent and may not on its own be the best reflection of individual patient prognosis. (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG-PET) can be used to evaluate the metabolic tumor burden affecting the whole body with measures such as metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). MTV and TLG have been shown to be significant prognostic factors in patients with lung cancer, independent of TNM stage. These metabolic tumor burden measures have the potential to make lung cancer staging and prognostication more accurate and quantitative, with the goal of optimizing treatment choices and outcome predictions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr Obara
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago 60637, USA
| | - Yonglin Pu
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago 60637, USA
| |
Collapse
|
146
|
FDG PET Metabolic Tumor Volume Segmentation and Pathologic Volume of Primary Human Solid Tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 202:1114-9. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.13.11456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
147
|
Foster B, Bagci U, Mansoor A, Xu Z, Mollura DJ. A review on segmentation of positron emission tomography images. Comput Biol Med 2014; 50:76-96. [PMID: 24845019 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 222] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2013] [Revised: 03/19/2014] [Accepted: 04/16/2014] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Positron Emission Tomography (PET), a non-invasive functional imaging method at the molecular level, images the distribution of biologically targeted radiotracers with high sensitivity. PET imaging provides detailed quantitative information about many diseases and is often used to evaluate inflammation, infection, and cancer by detecting emitted photons from a radiotracer localized to abnormal cells. In order to differentiate abnormal tissue from surrounding areas in PET images, image segmentation methods play a vital role; therefore, accurate image segmentation is often necessary for proper disease detection, diagnosis, treatment planning, and follow-ups. In this review paper, we present state-of-the-art PET image segmentation methods, as well as the recent advances in image segmentation techniques. In order to make this manuscript self-contained, we also briefly explain the fundamentals of PET imaging, the challenges of diagnostic PET image analysis, and the effects of these challenges on the segmentation results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brent Foster
- Center for Infectious Disease Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, United States
| | - Ulas Bagci
- Center for Infectious Disease Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, United States.
| | - Awais Mansoor
- Center for Infectious Disease Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, United States
| | - Ziyue Xu
- Center for Infectious Disease Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, United States
| | - Daniel J Mollura
- Center for Infectious Disease Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, United States
| |
Collapse
|
148
|
Langer NH, Christensen TN, Langer SW, Kjaer A, Fischer BM. PET/CT in therapy evaluation of patients with lung cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2014; 14:595-620. [PMID: 24702537 DOI: 10.1586/14737140.2014.883280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
FDG-PET/CT is a well documented and widespread used imaging modality for the diagnosis and staging of patient with lung cancer. FDG-PET/CT is increasingly used for the assessment of treatment effects during and after chemotherapy. However, PET is not an accepted surrogate end-point for assessment of response rate in clinical trials. The aim of this review is to present current evidence on the use of PET in response evaluation of patients with lung cancer and to introduce the pearls and pitfalls of the PET-technology relating to response assessment. Based on this and relating to validation criteria, including stable technology, standardization, reproducibility and broad availability, the review discusses why, despite numerous studies on response assessment indicating a possible role for FDG-PET/CT, PET still has no place in guidelines relating to response evaluation in lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha Hemicke Langer
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
149
|
Kostakoglu L, Cheson BD. Current role of FDG PET/CT in lymphoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2014; 41:1004-27. [PMID: 24519556 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-013-2686-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2013] [Accepted: 12/27/2013] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
The management approach in Hodgkin's (HL) and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL) has shifted towards reducing the toxicity and long-term adverse effects associated with treatment while maintaining favorable outcomes in low-risk patients. The success of an individualized treatment strategy depends largely on accurate diagnostic tests both at staging and during therapy. In this regard, positron emission tomography (PET) using fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) with computed tomography (CT) has proved effective as a metabolic imaging tool with compelling evidence supporting its superiority over conventional modalities, particularly in staging and early evaluation of response. Eventually, this modality was integrated into the routine staging and restaging algorithm of lymphomas. This review will summarize the data on the proven and potential utility of PET/CT imaging for staging, response assessment, and restaging, describing current limitations of this imaging modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lale Kostakoglu
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave Levy Place, Box 1141, New York, NY, 10029, USA,
| | | |
Collapse
|
150
|
Shim SH, Kim DY, Lee DY, Lee SW, Park JY, Lee JJ, Kim JH, Kim YM, Kim YT, Nam JH. Metabolic tumour volume and total lesion glycolysis, measured using preoperative18F-FDG PET/CT, predict the recurrence of endometrial cancer. BJOG 2014; 121:1097-106; discussion 1106. [DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/24/2013] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S-H Shim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; School of Medicine; Konkuk University; Seoul Korea
| | - D-Y Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; University of Ulsan College of Medicine; Asan Medical Centre; Seoul Korea
| | - D-Y Lee
- Department of Nuclear Medicine; University of Ulsan College of Medicine; Asan Medical Centre; Seoul Korea
| | - S-W Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; University of Ulsan College of Medicine; Asan Medical Centre; Seoul Korea
| | - J-Y Park
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; University of Ulsan College of Medicine; Asan Medical Centre; Seoul Korea
| | - JJ Lee
- Department of Nuclear Medicine; University of Ulsan College of Medicine; Asan Medical Centre; Seoul Korea
| | - J-H Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; University of Ulsan College of Medicine; Asan Medical Centre; Seoul Korea
| | - Y-M Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; University of Ulsan College of Medicine; Asan Medical Centre; Seoul Korea
| | - Y-T Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; University of Ulsan College of Medicine; Asan Medical Centre; Seoul Korea
| | - J-H Nam
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; University of Ulsan College of Medicine; Asan Medical Centre; Seoul Korea
| |
Collapse
|