Changing bone patterns with progression of chronic kidney disease

Turning over renal osteodystrophy dogma: direct actions of FGF23 on osteoblast β-catenin pathway

Although recognized as a major complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD), the pathophysiology of the CKD-related mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) is not completely understood. Recently, the inhibition of Wnt/β-catenin pathway in osteocytes by sclerostin has been shown to play a role in CKD-MBD. The study by Carrilo-Lopez et al. confirms this inhibition in an experimental model of CKD. Moreover, they describe direct actions of FGF23-Klotho on osteoblasts, increasing the expression of DKK1, another Wnt/β-catenin pathway inhibitor.

Hope for CKD-MBD Patients: New Diagnostic Approaches for Better Treatment of CKD-MBD

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) patients have a huge morbidity and mortality. Only relatively minor progress in therapeutic strategies has been made in the past decades. This is at least partially due to a lack of predictive diagnostic tools allowing personalized treatment of CKD-MBD patients.

SUMMARY

In this review we describe recent progress in the diagnosis of disturbances of calcium and phosphate metabolism in patients with CKD-MBD, measuring biological active nonoxidized parathyroid hormone as well as the overall likelihood of a patient to get calcified.

KEY MESSAGE

There is hope. The new tools have the potential of allowing personalized therapy for the treatment of CKD-MBD and hence improving outcome.

Uremic Toxicity and Bone in CKD

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), especially those on dialysis treatment, are at high risk of bone fracture. In CKD-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD), secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients with advanced CKD induces bone abnormalities, and skeletal resistance to parathyroid hormone (PTH) starts in the early stages of kidney disease. Uremic toxins such as indoxyl sulfate and p-cresyl sulfate reduce the expression of PTH receptor as well as PTH-induced cyclic adenosine 3',5' monophosphate production in osteoblasts. CKD also impairs bone strength, especially quality. In a rat model, kidney damage reduces the bone-storage modulus and changes the cortical bone chemical composition with or without hyperparathyroidism. The oral charcoal adsorbent AST-120 improves CKD-induced bone abnormalities as blood levels of indoxyl sulfate decrease. Uremic osteoporosis, a new concept of CKD-related bone fragility, is a main cause of CKD-induced bone abnormalities, particularly impaired bone quality. There is limited information about the effect and safety of anti-osteoporotic drugs for patients with CKD, especially those on dialysis, but the use of AST-120 and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors may modulate bone quality and decrease the incidence of fracture. Thus, the management of CKD-MBD plus use of other therapeutic interventions for uremic osteoporosis is necessary to prevent bone fragility in patients with CKD.

Renal Osteodystrophy-Time for Common Nomenclature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The term renal osteodystrophy has been used to describe a wide variety of bone problems facing patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Here, we review the history of the use of this term.

RECENT FINDINGS

Bone disease resulting from CKD was first noticed in 1890. The term "renal osteodystrophy" was used to define the bone disease in 1942. Since then, important discoveries have increased our knowledge of the complexities of bone physiology in these patients. At the same time, secular changes in the disease have occurred. The terms used to describe the bone histological findings have changed as well, reflecting new understanding of the physiological processes. However, since different investigators used the terms in different ways, the need to standardize the nomenclature has become increasingly important. Ongoing international collaboration about nosography will allow more optimal communication among scientists and clinicians as we continue to make new discoveries.

Opportunities for Engaging Patients in Kidney Research

Purpose:

The purpose of this review is to provide a summary of the rationale for engaging patients in research as well as to review the established and envisioned advantages and strategies for patient-researcher partnerships. The authors of this article, which include a patient and 4 researchers in kidney disease, discuss the expected benefits and opportunities for patient engagement in their respective research programs. The 4 research programs span the spectrum of kidney disease and focus on enhancing bone health, increasing living donor kidney transplants, improving medication adherence, and preventing kidney transplant rejection.

Sources of Information:

The sources of information for this review include published studies on the topics of patient engagement and the 4 research programs of the new investigators.

Key Findings:

(1) Patient, health care provider, and researcher partnerships can contribute useful insights capable of enhancing research in kidney disease. (2) Regardless of the research program, there are various strategies and opportunities for engagement of patients with lived experience across the various stages of research in kidney disease. (3) Envisioned advantages of patient-researcher partnerships include: targeting patient-identified research priorities, integrating patients’ experiential knowledge, improving study design and feasibility through patient-researcher input, facilitating dissemination of research findings to other patients, effectively responding to patient concerns about studies, and inspiring researchers to conduct their research.

Limitations:

The limitations of the current review include the relative scarcity of literature on patient engagement within the field of kidney disease.

Implications:

The findings of the current review suggest that it will be important for future studies to identify optimal strategies for patient engagement in setting research priorities, study design, participant recruitment, execution of research projects, and knowledge dissemination and translation.

Comment on Indoxyl Sulfate-Review of Toxicity and Therapeutic Strategies. Toxins 2016, 8, 358

Recently, the clinical and experimental evidences that support the toxic effects of indoxyl sulfate, a protein-bound uremic toxin in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, has been discussed. In this panorama, the authors described several in vitro and in vivo studies, suggesting that indoxyl sulfate may play a part in the pathogenesis of low turnover bone disease. However, the discussion claims the need for relevant clinical studies in CKD patients whose bone turnover biomarkers and bone histomorphometry were assessed in order to demonstrate the association between serum levels of indoxyl sulfate and bone turnover. We would like to underline the availability of this clinical data to support the concept that indoxyl sulfate may play a part in the pathogenesis of low turnover bone disease in CKD patients.

Bone mineral density is associated with vitamin D related rs6013897 and estrogen receptor polymorphism rs4870044: The Tromsø study

Background

Bone mineral density (BMD) is determined by bone remodeling processes regulated by endocrine, autocrine and genetic mechanisms. Thus, some studies have reported that BMD is associated with single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with vitamin D receptor (VDR), serum 25(OH)D levels and estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1), but without consensus. Therefore, we aimed to map and compare the risk genotypes for forearm and total hip low BMD.

Methods and findings

Data were derived from a population-based study in northern Norway; the Tromsø Study. Distal forearm BMD was measured with a single x-ray absorptiometric device, while total hip BMD was measured with a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometric device. There were 7,317 and 4,082 successful analyses of distal forearm and total hip BMD, respectively, and at least one SNP of interest. We evaluated plausible BMD modulating factors and associations of BMD and SNPs related to vitamin D metabolism (FokI, Cdx2, BsmI, rs2298850, rs10741657, rs3794060, rs6013897), ApaI-BsmI-TaqI haplotypes and ESR1 SNP rs4870044.

Results

Age, BMI, physical activity and smoking were significantly associated with BMD. In a linear regression model with adjustment for age and gender and with the major homozygote as reference, rs6013897 had a standardized beta coefficient (β) of –0.031 (P = 0.024) for total hip BMD. β for ESR1 SNP rs4870044 was –0.016 (P = 0.036) for forearm BMD and –0.034 (P = 0.015) for total hip BMD. The other SNPs nor serum 25(OH)D were significantly associated with BMD.

Conclusions

Both forearm and total hip BMD were associated with ESR1 SNP rs4870044. Of the vitamin D–related genes, only CYP24A1 gene rs6013897 was associated with total hip BMD, but the association was weak and needs confirmation in other studies. Serum 25(OH)D was not associated with BMD in our population, probably due to the generally sufficient vitamin D levels in the population.

Osteoporosis in patients with diabetes after kidney transplantation

Preexisting diabetes increases risk of fractures after kidney transplantation (KT). However, little is known about mechanisms and prevention of increased fragility in these patients. Pathophysiology of osteoporosis after KT is complex and characterized by high prevalence of adynamic bone disease. Despite high prevalence of preexisting diabetes in KT recipients, diabetes patients were underrepresented in the studies that explored mechanisms and treatments of osteoporosis after KT. Therefore, caution should be exercised before considering conventional fracture prevention strategies in this unique group of patients. Many traditional osteoporosis medications reduce bone turnover and, hence, can be ineffective or even harmful in diabetic patients after KT. Contrary to predictions, evidence from the studies conducted in mostly non-diabetic subjects demonstrated that bisphosphonates failed to reduce fracture rates after KT. Therefore, bisphosphonates use should be limited in diabetic patients until more evidence supporting their post-transplant efficacy is available. We recommend the following strategies that may help reduce fracture risk in diabetes subjects after KT such as adequate management of calcium, parathyroid hormone, and vitamin D levels, optimization of glycemic control, use of steroid-sparing immunosuppressive regimens, and fall prevention.

Parathyroid hormone metabolism and signaling in health and chronic kidney disease

Circulating parathyroid hormone (PTH) shows a complex relationship with hard outcomes in subjects with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Moreover, intervention studies directly targeting PTH failed to yield unequivocal results. Disturbed PTH metabolism, posttranslational modifications of PTH, and end-organ hyporesponsiveness to PTH may explain the poor performance of PTH as an outcome biomarker and precise target of therapy in the setting of CKD, at least in the gray middle target zone. PTH fragments accumulate in CKD patients and may exert effects that are distinct from, if not opposite to biointact (1-84)PTH. Posttranslational modification of PTH and especially oxidation may alter the interaction of PTH with its receptor. Its clinical relevance, however, remains a matter of ongoing debate. Less controversial is the issue of end-organ hyporesponsiveness to PTH. This phenomenon, formally referred to as PTH resistance, has long been recognized in CKD, but factors and mechanisms contributing to it remain poorly defined. Subsequent evidence identified downregulation of the PTH receptor and competing downstream signals as underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms. End-organ hyporesponsiveness to PTH in CKD, along with important analytical and biological variability, renders defining the PTH target range in CKD challenging. Although this may still be accomplished at the population level, it may prove to be very difficult at the individual level. This is a disillusioning thought in an era of personalized medicine. Parallel to the search of a functional and readily available assay quantifying PTH signaling tone or sensitivity, additional biomarkers (or a panel of biomarkers) should be formally evaluated.