Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer: results of the prospective study GORTEC 2004-03

[Intensity modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancers: ethics and patients selection]

PURPOSE

Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) allows a better coverage of the target volume and a better saving of organs at risk with a decrease of toxicity in head and neck cancers. It requires more human labor and materials compared to conformational radiotherapy. If they are insufficient, a selection of the patients receiving IMRT may be necessary, raising an ethical problem.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We collected the motives guiding the choice of the technique of radiotherapy for head and neck cancers during a month of physicists' shortage.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients received IMRT and eight conformational radiotherapy. Conformational irradiation was chosen in palliative and postsurgery treatments, to reduce delay, in laryngeal tumors and re-irradiation. IMRT was preferred for complex target volumes and the localizations at risk of important xerostomia following conformational radiotherapy. These choices were confronted with the bioethics criteria of Beauchamp and Childress. The beneficence justified the use of IMRT or conformational radiotherapy depending on the circumstances. The non-maleficence attempted to decrease the toxicity with IMRT. Justice was questioned by the selection. The autonomy of patients was not totally respected in the choice.

CONCLUSION

To help in the choice of the patients receiving an IMRT in a crisis situation, we proposed a hierarchical organization of selection criteria: complex volumes close to critical organs at risk, localization with high risk of xerostomia, long life expectancy and postoperative delay constraints.

Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) versus intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

To compare three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in curative-intent irradiation of head-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

METHODS

Previously untreated patients with biopsy-proven squamous carcinoma of oropharynx, larynx, or hypopharynx (T1-3, N0-2b) were randomly assigned using computer-generated permuted-block design to either 3D-CRT or IMRT, with incidence of physician-rated Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grade 2 or worse acute salivary gland toxicity as primary end-point.

RESULTS

Between 2005 and 2008, 60 patients randomly allocated to either 3D-CRT (n=28 patients) or IMRT (n=32) were included and analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. The proportion [95% confidence intervals (CI)] of patients with RTOG grade 2 or worse acute salivary gland toxicity was significantly lesser in the IMRT arm [19 of 32 patients (59%, 95%CI: 42-75%)] as compared to 3D-CRT [25 of 28 patients (89%, 95%CI: 72-97%; p=0.009)]. Late xerostomia and subcutaneous fibrosis were also significantly lesser with IMRT. There was significant recovery of salivary function over time in patients treated with IMRT (p-value for trend=0.0036). At 3-years, there were no significant differences in loco-regional control or survival between the two arms.

CONCLUSION

IMRT significantly reduces the incidence and severity of xerostomia compared to 3D-CRT in curative-intent irradiation of HNSCC.

Prospective evaluation of patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes following SBRT ± cetuximab for locally-recurrent, previously-irradiated head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a promising salvage strategy for unresectable, previously-irradiated recurrent squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (rSCCHN). Here-in, we report the first prospective evaluation of patient-reported quality-of-life (PR-QoL) following re-irradiation with SBRT±cetuximab for rSCCHN.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From November 2004 to May 2011, 150 patients with unresectable, rSCCHN in a previously-irradiated field receiving >40 Gy were treated with SBRT to 40-50 Gy in 5 fractions ± concurrent cetuximab. PR-QoL was prospectively acquired using the University of Washington Quality-of-Life Revised (UW-QoL-R).

RESULTS

Overall PR-QoL, health-related PR-QoL, and select domains commonly affected by re-irradiation progressively increase following an initial 1-month decline with statistically significant improvements noted in swallowing (p=0.025), speech (p=0.017), saliva (p=0.041), activity (p=0.032) and recreation (p=0.039).

CONCLUSIONS

Especially for patients surviving >1-year, improved tumor control associated with SBRT re-irradiation may ameliorate decreased PR-QoL resulting from rSCCHN. These improvements in PR-QoL transcend all measured domains in a validated PR-QoL assessment tool independent of age, use of cetuximab, tumor volume, and interval since prior irradiation.