Influence of previous corticosteroid therapy on temporal artery biopsy yield in giant cell arteritis

Isolated superficial temporal artery dissection masquerading as giant cell arteritis

A 79-year-old male presented with symptoms suggesting giant cell arteritis (GCA) and elevation of acute-phase reactants. Bilateral superficial temporal artery (STA) biopsies were negative for GCA. However, the right-sided biopsy showed a STA dissection. Spontaneous isolated STA dissection has never been reported previously. The pertinent available literature is also discussed.

Analysis of temporal artery biopsies in an 18-year period at a community hospital

OBJECTIVE

To identify analytical and clinical variables that may improve the effectiveness of temporal artery biopsy (TAB) for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of TABs conducted between 1989 and 2007 at the 450-bed Hospital Parc Taulí, Sabadell. Demographic data, clinical manifestations, analytical data prior to the biopsy and final diagnoses were recorded, including only those cases in which these data were reflected in the clinical history.

RESULTS

In this period, 278 TABs were conducted in 181 women (65.1%) and 97 men (mean age 74 years). Seventy-nine (28.4%) were positive (GCA+) and 199 (71.5%) negative (TAB-). The most frequent final diagnoses in the TAB- group were: polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) (18.6%), giant cell arteritis plus negative TAB (GCA-) (13.6%), tension headache (7.5%), infection (7.5%), other vasculitis (7.5%), and neoplasm (6.0%). The GCA+ group was compared with the TAB- group, the GCA- group and the PMR group. In the multivariate analysis only headache (RR 3.6), jaw claudication (RR 2.9) and abnormal temporal artery on palpation (RR 2.5) revealed statistical differences between the GCA+ and TAB- groups.

CONCLUSION

One third of the biopsies performed at our centre were positive for GCA. The clinical variables that best predicted a positive TAB in our series were headache, jaw claudication, and abnormal temporal artery on palpation.

Giant cell arteritis: an updated review

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common primary vasculitis of adults. The incidence of this disease is practically nil in the population under the age of 50 years, then rises dramatically with each passing decade. The median age of onset of the disease is about 75 years. As the ageing population expands, it is increasingly important for ophthalmologists to be familiar with GCA and its various manifestations, ophthalmic and non-ophthalmic. A heightened awareness of this condition can avoid delays in diagnosis and treatment. It is well known that prompt initiation of steroids remains the most effective means for preventing potentially devastating ischaemic complications. This review summarizes the current concepts regarding the immunopathogenetic pathways that lead to arteritis and the major phenotypic subtypes of GCA with emphasis on large vessel vasculitis, novel modalities for disease detection and investigative trials using alternative, non-steroid therapies.

Suspected giant cell arteritis: a study of referrals for temporal artery biopsy

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to describe the nature of cases undergoing temporal artery biopsy (TAB) for suspected giant cell arteritis (GCA).

METHODS

A retrospective review of case notes was undertaken for all patients on whom ophthalmologists had performed TAB in 2 teaching hospitals between 1995 and 2001. Presenting symptoms, referring specialty, TAB result, treatment, and discharge diagnosis were recorded.

RESULTS

Ophthalmologists performed TAB on 110 patients for suspected GCA. A variety of specialties referred patients to ophthalmology for TAB; presenting symptoms varied with referral source. Of the 110 TABs, 21 (19%) were reported as positive for GCA, 84 (76%) were negative, and 5 (4.5%) were reported as inadequate. The symptoms most commonly associated with a positive TAB were visual disturbance (15/21) and headache (15/21). The odds ratios for having a positive TAB result rather than a negative result were 1.0 for the presence of headache, 4.1 for visual disturbance, and 6.7 for jaw claudication.

INTERPRETATION

Physicians were faced with a different population of GCA suspects than ophthalmologists. While physicians should be alert to the significance of visual symptoms or jaw claudication, ophthalmologists should be ready to facilitate prompt TABs when appropriate. TAB should be performed promptly and an adequate length of artery taken for biopsy. An argument can be made that TAB is not needed in cases of suspected GCA. However, a positive result provides firm justification for the use of steroids. We feel that TAB has a useful role and we make reference to methods to maximize its usefulness.