European public acceptance of euthanasia: Socio-demographic and cultural factors associated with the acceptance of euthanasia in 33 European countries

[Tuition in palliative medicine. Does it have an impact on future physicians' attitudes toward active euthanasia?]

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to examine the attitude of medical students with or without tuition in palliative medicine towards active euthanasia and whether this changes during the course of the study period.

METHODS

A questionnaire was developed with 13 items (focus groups, preliminary tests) which takes knowledge and attitude into consideration. Students in the 2nd (2CS) and 6th (6CS) clinical semesters at 2 universities with (U1) and without (U2) palliative medicine as a compulsory subject were included.

RESULTS

The initial approval rate for active euthanasia was high for students in 2CS at both universities (U1 and U2), remained stable for U2 and sank clearly for U1. At U1 the number of students who would consider active euthanasia for themselves was greatly reduced but only slightly for U2. Of all the students, 40.9% of U2 and 22.5% of U1 were of the opinion that they could practice active euthanasia on patients. The majority admitted to being frightened to have responsibility for incurable patients. Of the students in 6CS, only 12.2% from U1 and 7.1% from U2 considered themselves sufficiently prepared to be responsible for terminally ill patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this questionnaire demonstrated a clear influence of tuition in palliative medicine on the rejection attitude of students towards active euthanasia, however, the attitude proactive euthanasia was still high. The results indicate that tuition in palliative medicine must be modified and substantially intensified.

A comparison of physicians' end-of-life decision making for non-western migrants and Dutch natives in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND

Non-western migrants have a different cultural background that influences their attitudes towards healthcare. As the first wave of this relatively young group is growing older, we investigated, for the first time, whether end-of-life decision-making practices for non-western migrants differ from Dutch natives.

METHODS

In 2005, we sent questionnaires to physicians who attended deaths identified from the central death registry of Statistics Netherlands (n = 9651; non-western migrants: n = 627, total response: 78%). We performed multivariate logistic regression analyses adjusted for age, sex and cause of death.

RESULTS

Of all deaths of non-western origin, 54% were non-sudden, whereas 67% of all deaths with a Dutch origin were non-sudden (P = 0.00). A relatively large number of non-suddenly deceased persons of non-western origin had died under the age of 65 (53%) as compared to Dutch natives (15%). Euthanasia was performed in 2.4% of all non-suddenly deceased persons in the non-western migrant group as compared to 2.7% in the native Dutch group (adjusted odds ratio = 0.82, P = 0.63). Alleviation of symptoms with a potential life-shortening effect was somewhat lower for non-western migrants (30% vs. 38%; adjusted odds ratio = 0.78, P = 0.07). Physicians decided to forgo potentially life-prolonging treatment in comparable rates (26% vs. 23%; adjusted odds ratio = 1.1, P = 0.73). Yet, the type of treatments forgone and underlying reasons differed.

CONCLUSION

Euthanasia was not less common among non-suddenly deceased non-western migrants as compared to Dutch natives. However, intensive symptom alleviation was used less frequently and forgoing potentially life-prolonging treatment involved different characteristics. These findings suggest that cultural factors may affect end-of-life decision making.

How do hospitals deal with euthanasia requests in Flanders (Belgium)? A content analysis of policy documents

OBJECTIVE

To describe the form and content of ethics policies on euthanasia in Flemish hospitals and the possible influence of religious affiliation on policy content.

METHODS

Content analysis of policy documents.

RESULTS

Forty-two documents were analyzed. All policies contained procedures; 57% included the position paper on which the hospital's stance on euthanasia was based. All policies described their hospital's stance on euthanasia in competent terminally ill patients (n=42); 10 and 4 policies, respectively, did not describe their stance in incompetent terminally and non-terminally ill patients. Catholic hospitals restrictively applied the euthanasia law with palliative procedures and interdisciplinary deliberations. The policies described several phases of the euthanasia care process--confrontation with euthanasia request (93%), decision-making process (95%), care process in cases of no-euthanasia decision (38%), preparation and performance of euthanasia (79%), and aftercare (81%)--as well as involvement of caregivers, patients, and relatives; ethical issues; support for caregivers; reporting; and practical examples of professional attitudes and communication skills.

CONCLUSION

Euthanasia policies go beyond summarizing the euthanasia law by addressing the importance of the euthanasia care process, in which palliative care and interdisciplinary cooperation are important factors.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Euthanasia policies provide tangible guidance for physicians and nurses on handling euthanasia requests.

Attitudes toward active euthanasia among medical students at two German universities

AIM

There has been an ongoing debate about a legalisation of active euthanasia (AE) in Germany. Palliative care education in German medical schools seeks to foster and cultivate a negative attitude toward AE, but little is known about its effectiveness in this respect. The aim of this study was to assess attitudes toward AE among students with and without palliative medicine tuition (PMT).

METHODS

The link to an anonymised online questionnaire was sent out to 1,092 third, fifth and sixth year medical students (YMS) in August-November 2006 at two German universities: university one (U1) with compulsory and additional optional PMT and university two (U2) without any PMT. Thirteen questions addressed active, passive or indirect euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (statistic: mean +/- SD (range), Wilcoxon, Whitney U Test, significance p < 0.05).

RESULTS

Response rate was 17.5%; 59.2% of the questionnaires were returned from U1 and 40.8% from U2; 28.3% of the students were male. Whereas 50% of third YMS at U1 and 36.7% at U2 favoured a legalisation of AE, this was true for 22.4% sixth YMS at U1 and 35.7% at U2. At U1, the number of students who would want to make use of AE for themselves decreased considerably (70%-44.9%) but less at U2; main reasons were 'unbearable suffering' and 'circumstances that lack dignity'. Of all students, 21.1% at U1 and 37.2% at U2 could imagine to perform AE in patients, even though 72.6% at U1 and 78.2% at U2 think its legalisation would promote misuse.

CONCLUSIONS

The high proportion of pro-AE attitudes gives reason to reconsider both 'standard' and palliative medicine tuition for medical students.

Ethics policies on euthanasia in hospitals—A survey in Flanders (Belgium)

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence, development, stance, and communication of written institutional ethics policies on euthanasia in Flemish hospitals.

METHODS

Cross-sectional mail survey of general directors of all hospitals (n=81) in Flanders, Belgium.

RESULTS

Of the 81 hospitals invited to participate, 71 (88%) completed the questionnaire. Of these, 45 (63%) had a written ethics policy on euthanasia. The Belgian Act on Euthanasia and centrally developed guidelines of professional organisations were the most frequently mentioned reasons for and sources used in developing ethics policies on euthanasia in hospitals. Up to one-third of hospitals reported that they developed the policy upon request from physicians or nurses, or after being confronted with a euthanasia request. Development and approval of institutional ethics policies occurred within a multidisciplinary context involving clinicians, ethicists, and hospital administrators. The majority of hospitals restrictively applied the euthanasia law by introducing palliative procedures in addition to legal due care criteria. Private Catholic hospitals, in particular, were more likely to be restrictive: euthanasia is not permitted or is permitted only in exceptional cases (in accordance with legal due care criteria and additional palliative care procedures). The majority of hospitals took the initiative to communicate the policy to hospital physicians and nurses.

CONCLUSIONS

Since the enactment of the Belgian Act on Euthanasia in 2002, the debate on how to deal with euthanasia requests has intensified in Flemish hospitals. The high prevalence of written institutional ethics policies on euthanasia and other medical end-of-life decisions is one possible outcome of this debate.

Attitudes toward euthanasia among Swedish medical students

Attitudes toward euthanasia differ between individuals and populations, and in many studies the medical profession is more reluctant than the general public. Our goal was to explore medical students' attitude toward euthanasia. A questionnaire containing open-ended questions was answered anonymously by 165 first- and fifth-year medical students. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis with no predetermined categories. The students' arguments opposing euthanasia were based on opinions of 1. euthanasia being morally wrong, 2. fear of possible negative effects on society, 3. euthanasia causing strain on physicians and 4. doubts about the true meaning of requests of euthanasia from patients. Arguments supporting euthanasia were based on 1. patients' autonomy and 2. the relief of suffering, which could be caused by severe illnesses, reduced integrity, hopelessness, social factors and old age. There are several contradictions in the students' arguments and the results indicate a possible need for education focusing on the possibility of symptom control in palliative care and patients' perceived quality of life.

Health professionals’ opposition to euthanasia and assisted suicide: a personal view

This commentary evaluates the motives of health professionals’ opposition to the legislation of assisted dying. We argue that there are no rational or justifiable grounds for such opposition in the case of patients who are suffering unbearably and whose request to be helped to die is competent, enduring and voluntary.

We then engage in plausible speculation about what other, more hidden motives of health professionals might lead to them reject the legislation of assisted dying. We assert that, while these hidden motives are understandable from a psychological perspective, they also suffocate the self-determination of palliative patients. Therefore, the challenge is for health professionals to reconsider extending their own limits in order to fully support their patients’ needs.

Finally we discuss the consequences of NOT legalising assisted dying, and conclude that this position might be more detrimental than legalising it.

Institutional ethics policies on medical end-of-life decisions: a literature review

OBJECTIVES

The responsibility of healthcare administrators for handling ethically sensitive medical practices, such as medical end-of-life decisions (MELDs), within an institutional setting has been receiving more attention. The overall aim of this paper is to thoroughly examine the prevalence, content, communication, and implementation of written institutional ethics policies on MELDs by means of a literature review.

METHODS

Major databases (Pubmed, Cinahl, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, FRANCIS, and Philosopher's Index) and reference lists were systematically searched for all relevant papers. Inclusion criteria for relevance were that the study was empirically based and that it focused on the prevalence, content, communication, or implementation of written institutional ethics policies concerning MELDs.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 19 studies of American, Canadian, Dutch and Belgian origin. The majority of studies dealt with do-not-resuscitate (DNR) policies (prevalence: 10-89%). Only Dutch and Belgian studies dealt with policies on pain and symptom control (prevalence: 15-19%) and policies on euthanasia (prevalence: 30-79%). Procedural and technical aspects were a prime focus, while the defining of the specific roles of involved parties was unclear. Little attention was given to exploring ethical principles that question the ethical function of policies. In ethics policies on euthanasia, significant consideration was given to procedures that dealt with conscientious objections of physicians and nurses. Empirical studies about the implementation of ethics policies are scarce.

CONCLUSIONS

With regard to providing support for physicians and nurses, DNR and euthanasia policies expressed support by primarily providing technical and procedural guidelines. Further research is needed whether and in which way written institutional ethics policies on MELDs could contribute to better end-of-life care.