The outcomes of 27,063 women with unstaged endometrioid uterine cancer

Current and future surgical approaches in the management of endometrial carcinoma

The surgical approach to endometrial carcinoma has been and continues to be inconsistent. It ranges from hysterectomy alone for all patients, hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy based on the surgeon’s criteria for risk of nodal metastasis based on preoperative grading and/or intraoperative assessments, and hysterectomy with limited lymphadenectomy, to hysterectomy with full pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for all patients. Recent evidence has clearly described the very poor correlation of pre- and/or intraoperative assessments with final hysterectomy pathologic findings. Lymphadenectomy has also been found to be therapeutic in high-risk groups. Despite this, many surgeons have not adopted a policy of comprehensive staging for all patients with endometrial carcinoma. All patients with endometrial carcinoma diagnosed on preoperative endometrial sampling should undergo comprehensive surgical staging if technically and medically possible. Surgical cytoreduction of metastatic disease is also associated with improved outcomes.

Controversies surrounding lymphadenectomy and postoperative radiotherapy in the treatment of carcinoma of the endometrium

Hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy have long been acknowledged to be the centerpiece of therapy for carcinoma of the endometrium. However, 30 years ago, realization of the metastatic potential of this disease, particularly to regional lymph nodes, led many clinicians to include lymphadenectomy in the surgical management of uterine cancer. Retrospective studies have since demonstrated that lymphadenectomy is associated with an acceptably low level of surgical morbidity. The incorporation of lymphadenectomy into the surgical management of uterine cancer has accompanied a dramatic reduction in the use of peri-operative radiotherapy. Though not confirmed by prospective data, retrospective series have associated complete lymphadenectomy with an improvement in survival, even in node-negative patients. Contributing to a reduction in the use of postoperative radiation in endometrial cancer have been several randomized trials demonstrating a reduction in locoregional recurrence, but at the cost of significant radiation-induced toxicity and no improvement in overall survival.

Role of complete lymphadenectomy in endometrioid uterine cancer

Although surgical pathological staging is the standard of care for uterine carcinoma, the benefits of a complete lymphadenectomy remain controversial. Evidence suggests that this procedure provides prognostic information and directs the use of appropriate adjuvant treatment in patients who are node-positive. Furthermore, it eliminates the need for adjuvant treatment in low-risk patients with negative nodes and no extrauterine spread of disease. Although the complications associated with this procedure raise the question as to whether all low-risk patients need a complete lymphadenectomy, the limitations of preoperative and intraoperative pathological analyses mean that lymphadenectomy in low-risk patients might still have merit. Future advances are warranted to enhance preoperative radiological and intraoperative pathological assessment to establish the risk of nodal disease. In this review, we assess the evidence on the prognostic and therapeutic benefits of a complete versus selective lymphadenectomy. Moreover, we discuss the complications associated with lymphadenectomy and identify subsets of low-risk patients who might not need to undergo this procedure.