Use of harmonic imaging without echocardiographic contrast to improve two-dimensional image quality

Clinical impact of second harmonic imaging and left heart contrast in echocardiographic stress testing

Second harmonic imaging and left heart contrast agents are recent echocardiographic advancements that enhance the assessment of wall motion. Because little information exists concerning their clinical impact on echocardiographic stress testing in daily practice, this was determined for 9-month periods before (1997) and after (1998) their introduction. Harmonic imaging was used in all patients after its introduction. A second generation intravenous left heart contrast agent (Optison) was used at the discretion of the sonographer and physician team. Both exercise and dobutamine stress tests were included. At the time of study interpretation, diagnostic confidence was assigned as high, medium, or low. For all patients who underwent coronary angiography < or = 6 months after stress testing, the diagnostic accuracy was determined (true positive plus true negative/total studies). There were 574 studies before and 746 studies after implementation. Optison was used in 28% of the harmonic imaging studies. Study cancellations due to uninterpretable images fell from 6.4% to 1.2% (p <0.001) despite a more obese population completing testing (body mass index: 29 +/- 7 to 31 +/- 8 kg/m2, p = 0.02), whereas high diagnostic confidence increased from 55% to 64% (p <0.001). For the 7% of patients who underwent cardiac catheterization, the diagnostic accuracy remained unchanged (74 vs 73%) although a prior negative stress test was less common (40% to 20% p = 0.04). Thus, these new technologies had a favorable clinical impact.

Non-contrast second harmonic imaging improves interobserver agreement and accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with impaired image quality

OBJECTIVE

To examine the influence of second harmonic imaging during dobutamine echocardiography on regional endocardial visibility, interobserver agreement in the interpretation of wall motion abnormalities, and diagnostic accuracy in patients with reduced image quality.

DESIGN

Blinded comparison.

SETTING

Tertiary care centre.

PATIENTS

103 consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease and impaired transthoracic image quality (>/= 2 segments with poor endocardial delineation).

METHODS

Fundamental and second harmonic imaging were performed at each stage of a dobutamine stress echocardiography. Coronary angiography was undertaken within three weeks of dobutamine echocardiography in 75 patients.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Evaluation of regional endocardial visibility (scoring from 0 = poor to 2 = good) and of segmental wall motion abnormalities for both modalities separately. A second blinded examiner analysed 70 studies to determine interobserver agreement.

RESULTS

Mean (SD) visibility score for all segments was 1.2 (0.4) using fundamental imaging and 1.7 (0.2) using second harmonic imaging at rest (p < 0.001), and 1.1 (0.4) v 1.6 (0.3), respectively, at peak dobutamine dose (p < 0.001). The average number of segments with poor endocardial visibility was lower for second harmonic than for fundamental imaging (0.6 (1.1) v 3.8 (2.6) at rest, p < 0.001; 0.9 (1.3) v 4.3 (2.9) at peak dose, p < 0.001). Improvement was most pronounced in all lateral and anterior segments. The kappa value for identical study interpretation increased from 0. 40 to 0.69 (p < 0.05). Sensitivity for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease was 64% using fundamental imaging versus 92% using harmonic imaging (p < 0.001), while specificity remained unchanged at 75% for both imaging modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Second harmonic imaging enhances endocardial visibility during dobutamine echocardiography. Consequently, interobserver agreement on stress echocardiography interpretation and diagnostic accuracy are significantly improved compared to fundamental imaging. Thus, in difficult to image patients, dobutamine echocardiography should be performed using second harmonic imaging.

The role of echocardiographic harmonic imaging and contrast enhancement for improvement of endocardial border delineation

Despite advances in imaging technology, many myocardial segments remain poorly visualized with echocardiography; however, both contrast enhancement and harmonic imaging have shown promise for improving endocardial definition. Fifty subjects with technically limited echocardiograms were studied with fundamental and harmonic imaging as well as during echocardiographic contrast injection. Overall endocardial visualization scores improved with both techniques compared with fundamental imaging. Harmonic imaging improved endocardial visualization in 43% of all segments and in 57% of segments nonvisualized with fundamental imaging. The benefit of harmonic imaging was seen in all segments. Contrast echocardiography had similar overall improvements in visualization (42% of all segments, 67% of segments nonvisualized with fundamental imaging) but was not helpful in all regions. Harmonic imaging outperformed contrast in 9 of 22 segments, whereas contrast was superior in 4 of 22. In a subgroup of patients with very poor images, contrast enhancement was superior, with a greater increase in overall score and a higher salvage rate than harmonic (68% vs 40%).

Improved echocardiographic delineation of left ventricular thrombus with the use of intravenous second-generation contrast image enhancement

Transthoracic echocardiography is the most widely used diagnostic test for left ventricular (LV) thrombus, which must be distinguished from other intraventricular structures and image artifacts. To determine whether second-generation intravenous echocardiographic contrast agents provide better delineation of LV thrombus, we reviewed the results of 2-dimensional echocardiographic studies that were performed in 409 patients over a 1-year period to detect LV thrombus. Studies of 190 (46%) patients were interpreted as nondiagnostic for this purpose, of which 48 patients underwent an additional study after intravenous injection of 0.5 to 2 mL of human albumin microspheres within 1 to 4 days. In 43 (90%) of these 48 patients the contrast-enhanced study was definitive and diagnostic for either the presence or absence of an LV thrombus (P <.0001). Of the initial total of 409 patients, 81 had been studied at the bedside in intensive care units. The bedside studies were nondiagnostic for LV thrombus in 51 (63%) of these 81 patients. Of these 51 patients, 14 underwent additional imaging with contrast enhancement, and the contrast-enhanced images became diagnostic (P =. 004) in 11 (79%) of them. Thus intravenous contrast image enhancement improves the diagnostic yield of echocardiography in patients in whom initial images are nondiagnostic for LV thrombus.

Effect of harmonic imaging without contrast on image quality of transesophageal echocardiography

Harmonic imaging improves endocardial border delineation during transesophageal echocardiography when compared with conventional imaging (26% improvement vs 2% worsening; p <0.001). This allows better assessment of left ventricular function during cardiac surgery, and suggests a role of harmonic imaging for transesophageal echocardiography.

Dobutamine stress echocardiography: improved endocardial border definition and wall motion analysis with tissue harmonic imaging

BACKGROUND

We performed a study to determine whether tissue harmonic imaging (THI) facilitates wall motion analysis at rest and whether these benefits extend through the stages of a dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) study. We also assessed the impact of THI on the feasibility of DSE in technically difficult patients. Finally we tested the hypothesis that THI by improving endocardial border definition (EBD) could enhance the interobserver agreement between trainees and experienced operators for interpreting DSE studies.

METHODS

Twenty unselected patients underwent DSE by standard protocol. Parasternal and apical views were obtained with the use of fundamental mode (FND) and THI at baseline, low dose, and peak stress. Segmental EBD was characterized as 1 to 4 (1 = excellent) and segmental wall motion was characterized as 1 to 4/x (1 = normal, x = unable to interpret) by a consensus of 2 experienced observers. A trainee in stress echocardiography independently scored all segments, and these results were compared with the consensus of the experienced readers.

RESULTS

EBD improved with THI in 26 +/- 6.7 of 48 segments per patient (54%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40 to 0.68) and deteriorated with THI in only 2 +/- 2.7 (4%, 95% CI 0 to 0.09). Of the total of 48 segments per patient, a mean of 10 +/- 5.7 (21%, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.31) were of inadequate quality to be interpreted for wall motion on FND, and this changed to 4 +/- 3.4 (6%, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.12) on THI (P <.001). EBD improved in a similar degree in all DSE stages 53%, 54%, and 53% for rest, low dose, and peak stress, respectively. Six of the 20 study patients were deemed unsuitable for DSE on FND, and all were changed to suitable subjects on THI. Of the 205 segments deemed unsuitable for interpretation on FND, 140 (68%) were of the anterior and lateral walls of the LV. Improvement with THI was also more prominent on these walls. The mean coefficient of agreement (kappa) for wall motion analysis was 0.82 +/- 0.14 on FND and improved to 0. 92 +/- 0.09 on THI (P <.001).

CONCLUSIONS

THI dramatically improves EBD and the ability to confidently score segmental wall motion. Interobserver agreement is also significantly enhanced. These benefits extend to the peak stage of a DSE study. Routine use of THI may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of DSE and extend its application to technically difficult patients previously deemed unsuitable.

Exercise echocardiography. Principles, methods, and clinical use

Stress echocardiography is composed of a family of examinations in which various forms of cardiovascular stress are combined with echocardiographic imaging to assist in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Exercise cardiography has evolved over the past 20 years into a routinely available clinical tool employed in both university and community hospital settings. This article discusses advantages and disadvantages of using exercise echocardiography.

Three-dimensional echocardiographic analysis of valve anatomy as a determinant of mitral regurgitation after surgery for atrioventricular septal defects

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a significant complication after atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD) surgery. The relation of the valve leaflet morphology and the MR mechanism remains a conundrum. Two-dimensional echocardiography depicts leaflet edges, whereas volume-rendered 3-dimensional echocardiography provides direct visualization of the surface areas of the mitral valve leaflets. This study examines the relation of mitral valve anatomy as determined by 3-dimensional echocardiography with MR origins in patients after AVSD repair. Twenty-seven patients with AVSD surgery and Doppler color MR were prospectively enrolled (median age was 5 years and 16 patients had Down syndrome). Doppler color flow imaging of the MR jet and 3-dimensional echocardiography of the mitral valve were performed with a probe in the transthoracic or transesophageal position. Enface 3-dimensional views of the mitral valve from the left atrium were reconstructed. Analysis of the 3-dimensional data was possible in 21 of the 27 patients. Mean area ratios of the 3 mitral leaflets were calculated (superior 40 +/- 7%, inferior 35 +/- 5%, mural 25 +/- 6%). Both intra and interobserver variability on the area measurements were <5%. In 12 patients (group 1) the jet appeared to emanate medially from the region of coaptation of the superior and inferior components of the anterior leaflet. In 9 patients (group 2) the jet emanated more laterally from the region toward the mural leaflet. The area ratios of the inferior leaflet were 32 +/- 4% in group 1 and 38 +/- 6% in group 2 (p = 0.02). The area ratios of the mural leaflet were 28 +/- 5% in group 1 and 21 +/- 5% in group 2 (p = 0.007). The superior leaflet area ratio was not different in groups 1 and 2, 40 +/- 9% and 41 +/- 6%, respectively. Three-dimensional echocardiography provides new insight into the anatomic determinants of MR following AVSD surgery.

Color Kinesis: New Technique or Just Another Display of Acoustic Quantification?

Color kinesis is a relatively new echocardiographic technique that allows color encoding of endocardial motion in real time. We briefly review the literature on the current clinical uses and limitations of this technique, as well as its potential future applications based on some of our results. The major advantage of this modality is that it provides the basis for objective and automated evaluation of regional systolic and diastolic function, which may have a direct impact on the diagnosis of various myocardial disease states and, in particular, coronary artery disease.

Acoustic Quantification Today and Its Future Horizons

We briefly review previously published work based on the uses of acoustic quantification (AQ) or validation of this technology. We also discuss the limitations of AQ in a critical review of the literature, including operator dependency, signal noise, and low temporal resolution. We describe some enhancements made to AQ software to address these limitations and improve the accuracy of this technique, including digital beam processing, harmonic imaging, and signal averaging. Several anticipated applications are also briefly described for those interested in the future development of this technology. These future applications include noninvasive long-term monitoring of ventricular function and objective assessment of regional ventricular wall motion in two and three dimensions.

Load-Independent Indices of Left Ventricular Function Using Automated Border Detection

Echocardiographic automated border detection is the ability to assess left ventricular (LV) cross-sectional cavity areas and volumes on line. This capability has enabled the use of LV pressure-volume relationships as a means to determine LV function in a manner relatively independent of loading conditions. This discussion reviews previous validation studies in animal models and humans using LV cross-sectional area as a surrogate for LV volume and the clinical applications of LV pressure-area relations. Applications of arterial pressure as a substitute for LV ejection pressure to assess pressure-area relations are also reviewed, along with the use of pressure-area relations to assess right ventricular performance. Last, preload-adjusted maximal power as an alternative load-insensitive means to determine LV performance is discussed.