Factors associated with endodontic interappointment emergencies of teeth with necrotic pulps

[Clinical and radiographic assessment of single-appointment endodontic treatment in teeth with chronic periapical lesions]

The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of postoperative pain and the type of periapical repair, after one-appointment endodontic treatment in asymptomatic patients who presented with pulpal necrosis and radiographically visible chronic periapical lesions. For that, after biomechanical preparation through the step down followed by the step back technique, aided by copious irrigation with 5.0% sodium hypochlorite solution, the filling of the root canals was carried out through the conventional technique, with gutta-percha cones and zinc oxide-eugenol cement. In the immediate postoperative period, 16.6% of all patients presented with spontaneous pain, although the incidence of severe pain--flare-ups--was 3.3%. After twelve months, all patients were asymptomatic and free of fistula, nevertheless only 46.4% exhibited complete resolution of the radiolucent periapical areas. Therefore, in a medium term, the one-appointment endodontic treatment showed 100% of clinical success, but showed a reduced rate of radiographic success.

The standardized-taper root canal preparation--Part 4. GT file technique in large root canals with large apical diameters

AIM

To describe the GT file shaping steps required to create apical resistance in the presence of a wide root apex.

SUMMARY

Canals are occasionally encountered with apices wider than 0.25 mm. These can be some of the most difficult to manage with conventional instruments, and overfills are common. Shaping such canals with GT files requires a paradigm shift of thinking, extending tapered files through the apex to create linear resistance in the apical few mm of the canal. GT standard and accessory files allow canals with apices up to around 0.7 mm to be prepared for tapered gutta percha cone-fit. Apices larger than this should be considered too large for further shaping, and repaired with MTA before filling.

KEY LEARNING POINTS

Tapered apical preparations offer optimal resistance form for obturation. Tapered apical preparations can be prepared in most roots with wide apices by extending GT files and GT accessory files to or through the apex. Apices wider than 0.7 mm should be repaired with MTA prior to filling.

Effect of penicillin on postoperative endodontic pain and swelling in symptomatic necrotic teeth

The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to determine the effect of penicillin on postoperative pain and swelling in symptomatic necrotic teeth. Forty-one emergency patients participated and each had a clinical diagnosis of a symptomatic necrotic tooth with associated periapical radiolucency. After endodontic treatment patients randomly received a 7-day oral dose (twenty-eight 500 mg capsules to be taken every 6 h) of either penicillin or a placebo control in a double-blind manner. Patients also received ibuprofen; acetaminophen with codeine (30 mg); and a 7-day diary to record pain, percussion pain, swelling, and number and type of pain medication taken. The majority of patients with symptomatic necrotic teeth had significant postoperative pain and require analgesic medication to manage this pain. The administration of penicillin postoperatively did not significantly (p > 0.05) reduce pain, percussion pain, swelling, or the number of analgesic medications taken for symptomatic necrotic teeth with periapical radiolucencies.

Effect of prophylactic amoxicillin on endodontic flare-up in asymptomatic, necrotic teeth

The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to determine the effect of prophylactic amoxicillin on the occurrence of endodontic flare-up in asymptomatic, necrotic teeth. Seventy patients participated and had a clinical diagnosis of an asymptomatic, necrotic tooth with associated periapical radiolucency. One hour before endodontic treatment, patients randomly received either 3 g of amoxicillin or 3 g of a placebo control in a double-blind manner. After endodontic treatment, each patient received: ibuprofen; acetaminophen with codeine (30 mg); and a 5 1/2-day diary to record pain, swelling, percussion pain, and number and type of pain medication taken. The results demonstrated 10% of the 70 patients had a flare-up characterized by moderate-to-severe postoperative pain or swelling that began approximately 30 h after endodontic treatment and persisted for an average of 74 h. Of the seven patients who had flare-ups, 4 were in the amoxicillin group and 3 were not. Prophylactic amoxicillin did not significantly (p = 0.80) influence the endodontic flare-up. We concluded that a prophylactic dose of amoxicillin before endodontic treatment of asymptomatic, necrotic teeth had no effect on the endodontic flare-up.

Effect of trephination on postoperative pain and swelling in symptomatic necrotic teeth

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this prospective, randomized, blinded study was to determine the effect of trephination on postoperative pain and swelling in symptomatic necrotic teeth.

STUDY DESIGN

Fifty emergency patients participated, and each had a clinical diagnosis of a symptomatic necrotic tooth with associated periapical radiolucency. After endodontic treatment, patients randomly received either a trephination or mock trephination procedure. The trephination procedure used an intraosseous perforator to provide an initial opening in the cortical bone that was enlarged with files (No. 25 through No. 70) and an endodontic spoon. After surgery, each patient received ibuprofen; acetaminophen with codeine (30 mg); and a 7-day diary to record pain, percussion pain, swelling, and number and type of pain medication taken.

RESULTS

The majority of patients with symptomatic necrotic teeth had significant postoperative pain and required analgesics to manage this pain. The use of a trephination procedure with an intraosseous perforator, files, and a spoon excavator did not significantly reduce pain, percussion pain, swelling, or the number of analgesic medications taken in symptomatic necrotic teeth with periapical radiolucencies (P >.05).

CONCLUSION

We cannot recommend the routine use of a trephination procedure, as used in this study, for relief of pain in symptomatic necrotic teeth with radiolucencies.

A comparison of pulpectomy alone versus pulpectomy with trephination for the relief of pain

Patients who when initially seen have pain of endodontic origin have a higher incidence of posttreatment pain than those who are pain-free pretreatment. The purpose of this study was to compare two methods of treatment--pulpectomy alone or pulpectomy with trephination--for the reduction of posttreatment pain in patients presenting with acute periradicular pain of pulpal origin. Seventeen patients with pretreatment pain were studied. Eleven received a pulpectomy to the radiographically determined working length. Six patients received a pulpectomy and trephination using a #4 round bur through a vertical incision. Visual analog scales were used preoperatively to measure pain intensity and unpleasantness, and postoperatively to measure intensity, unpleasantness, and pain relief at 4, 8, 16, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h. Analysis of preoperative data showed no difference between control and experimental groups. Posttreatment, at 4 h, the trephination group reported significantly more pain intensity and unpleasantness and less pain relief than the control group. Pulpectomy alone provided significantly better postoperative pain relief at 4 h compared with pulpectomy with trephination. At no time interval did the trephination group have less pain than the group without trephination.

Factors associated with endodontic flare-ups: a prospective study

The purpose of this prospective study was to assess the incidence of flare-ups (a severe problem requiring an unscheduled visit and treatment) among patients who received endodontic treatment by the two authors in their respective practices during a period of one year, and also to examine the correlation with pre-operative and operative variables. The results showed an incidence of 1.58% for flare-ups from 1012 endodontically treated teeth. Statistical analysis using the chi-square test (P<0.05) indicated that flare-ups were found to be positively correlated with multiple appointments, retreatment cases, periradicular pain prior to treatment, presence of radiolucent lesions, and patients taking analgesic or anti-inflammatory drugs. In contrast, there was no correlation between flare-up, and age, sex, different arch/tooth groups and the status of the pulp.

Effectiveness of various medications on postoperative pain following root canal obturation

This prospective study compared the effectiveness of nine medications and a placebo in controlling pain following obturation. A total of 588 patients who required root canal obturation were included. After obturation of root canals, each patient took one of the medications, salicylic acid (2 x 250 mg), acetaminophen (2 x 250 mg), ibuprofen (2 x 250 mg), ketoprofen (2 x 250 mg), acetaminophen (2 x 250 mg) plus codeine (2 x 250 mg), penicillin (2 x 250 mg), erythromycin base (2 x 250 mg), penicillin plus ibuprofen (2 x 250 mg), methylprednisolone (2 x 250 mg) plus penicillin (2 x 250 mg), or a placebo, every 6 h for 72 h. All medications were encapsulated in identical capsules. The patients registered their degree of discomfort on a visual analogue scale of 0 to 9. Statistical analysis of the data showed that the incidence of postoperative pain after obturation is lower than that following complete cleaning and shaping (5.83% versus 21.76%). In addition, there was no significant difference between the effectiveness of the various medications and placebo tablets in controlling postoperative pain following obturation.

Effectiveness of various medications on postoperative pain following complete instrumentation

The root canals of 588 consecutive nonsurgical patients with varying levels of pain were completely instrumented in 10 endodontic practices and 4 endodontic graduate programs. The participants were sequentially assigned to one of nine medications and a placebo. The severity of pain was assessed by the visual analog scale for 72 h following instrumentation. Among all of the parameters studied, three factors (preoperative pain, apprehension, and types of medication) were found to be significant in determining postinstrumentation pain. An association was found between the intensity of pre-and postoperative pain. As the intensity of preoperative pain increased, the chances for more severe postoperative pain increased (p < 0.0001). In addition, an association between the presence of apprehension before any treatment and postoperative pain was also noted (between 0.012 < p < 0.047). Examination of the time-effect curves for various medications in patients with no mild pain showed no statistical significant difference between the effectiveness of different medications and placebo. However, a multiple comparison of the effectiveness of various medications and placebo on patients in moderate and severe preoperative pain showed that ibuprofen, ketoprofen, erythromycin base, penicillin, and methylprednisolone plus penicillin were more effective than placebo within the first 48 h following complete instrumentation.

Factors associated with continuing pain in endodontics

A survey of 100 patients referred to a specialist endodontic practice was undertaken to determine the frequency of various factors associated with continuing pain after endodontic treatment had been commenced by the patient's general dental practitioner. Information was obtained by questioning the patient, examining the tooth, reviewing information supplied by the referring dentist and by observation during subsequent treatment. There were 23 different factors associated with continuing pain--all patients had more than one factor; most (78 per cent) had four, five or six factors; the highest was 9 factors (2 per cent). The most commonly occurring factors were: lack of use of rubber dam (87 per cent), unsatisfactory temporary restorations (80 per cent), and inappropriate use of intracanal medicaments (71 per cent). The other factors were related to diagnostic or treatment errors that could have been avoided in most cases. This survey suggests that dentists need to pay more attention to basic treatment recommendations in order to predictably relieve pain when carrying out emergency endodontics.

Prophylactic penicillin: effect on posttreatment symptoms following root canal treatment of asymptomatic periapical pathosis

It has been reported that administration of prophylactic penicillin may prevent flare-ups or other undesirable posttreatment sequelae following root canal treatment. To test this hypothesis in a prospective study, 80 patients with a diagnosis of pulp necrosis and chronic apical periodontitis were divided into three groups: group A (prophylactic penicillin, AHA recommendation), group B (placebo, same regimen), and group C (no medication). Medications and evaluations were double-blinded. Patients reported their posttreatment events including incidence of flare-ups, incidence and severity of pain/swelling, and occurrence of adverse side effects. Differences in the three groups were determined statistically using chi-square tests. The outcome showed no significant difference (p = 0.68) among the three groups. That is, administration/nonadministration of penicillin prophylactically was unrelated to posttreatment signs and symptoms following canal preparation. Incidence of flare-ups was very low (1 of 80). Occurrence of pain in the mild-moderate levels was fairly high (approximately 70% overall), but was primarily in the mild category. Overall incidence of side effects was also very low (2 of 80). Severe levels of pain/swelling and flare-up incidence were low with no difference between administration or nonadministration of antibiotics. Based on our data, using penicillin (a potentially dangerous drug) prophylactically to control posttreatment symptoms is not recommended in cases of pulp necrosis and asymptomatic periapical pathosis.

Delayed root canal therapy: an analysis of treatment over time

A retrospective study of 898 teeth receiving root canal therapy was performed to document the sequelae of delayed completion of root canal treatment. Teeth were categorized into a prompt treatment group and a delayed treatment group. Comparisons of prompt and delayed treatment groups were made with regard to preoperative pain, interappointment emergencies, postobturation pain, and final treatment. Findings from this study show that a palliative endodontic procedure is an extremely effective treatment. However, 56% of teeth with incomplete root canal therapy eventually were extracted compared with 2 to 3% for the root canal filling treatment groups. By emphasizing the potential loss of the tooth rather than the potential of interappointment emergencies, the clinician may be more effective in achieving compliance among patients receiving delayed treatment.

Endodontic interappointment flare-ups: a prospective study of incidence and related factors

Severe pain and/or swelling following a root canal treatment appointment are serious sequelae. Information varies or is incomplete as to the incidence of these conditions and related factors. In this study, data were collected at root canal treatment appointments on demographics, pulp/periapical diagnoses, presenting symptoms, treatment procedures, and number of appointments. Patients that then experienced a flare-up (a severe problem requiring an unscheduled visit and treatment) had the correlating factors examined. Statistical determinations were by chi-square analysis with significance at 0.05 or less. Nine hundred forty-six visits resulted in an incidence of 3.17% flare-ups. Flare-ups were positively correlated with more severe presenting symptoms, pulp necrosis with painful apical pathosis, and patients on analgesics. Fewer flare-ups occurred in undergraduate patients and following obturation procedures. There was no correlation between patient demographics or systemic conditions, number of appointments, treatment procedures, or taking antibiotics.

Postoperative pain incidence related to the type of emergency treatment of symptomatic pulpitis

Some endodontic emergencies occur as a result of attempts to relieve symptoms of pulpitis. The aim of this study was to identify any predictor of postoperative pain in a patient population treated by dental students. Patients who reported for treatment of symptomatic pulpitis were subjected to three different emergency treatment regimens. Clinical data was collected on those patients who reported in the emergency service with severe postoperative pain within 24 hours of emergency endodontic treatment. Statistical analysis of these data suggested that the type of endodontic emergency procedure carried out was a significant predictor of severe postoperative pain.

The role of intracanal medication in root canal treatment

The role of intracanal medication as a root canal dressing is re-examined. In pulpectomy and some root canal treatments, where the root canal contains vital pulp tissue, it is doubtful whether a routine intracanal medicament is needed. In infected root canals, intracanal medication has been advocated for many purposes. An intracanal medicament is used to: (i) eliminate any remaining bacteria after canal instrumentation; (ii) reduce inflammation of periapical tissues and pulp remnants; (iii) render canal contents inert and neutralize tissue debris; (iv) act as a barrier against leakage from the temporary filling; (v) help to dry persistently wet canals. However, most of the indications for intracanal medicaments are questionable. Intracanal medicaments should only be used for root canal disinfection as part of controlled asepsis in infected root canals, and their role is secondary to cleaning and shaping of the root canal. Thorough canal debridement and adequate canal preparation are more pertinent, and their importance is emphasized. Bacteriological sampling may be necessary if a tooth does not respond to treatment, to help in the choice of intracanal medicament.

A clarification on endodontic flare-ups

In an article on endodontic flare-ups by Robert J. Matusow, our research and publications are discussed. Since we found what we consider to be distortions and misinterpretations of our work, it was decided to clarify the apparent discrepancies found in Matusow's article.

Treatment of the endodontic emergency: a decade later

A questionnaire was sent to diplomates of the American Board of Endodontics to determine changing trends in the treatment of endodontic emergencies since Dorn's survey 10 yr ago. There is a definitely greater trend toward complete instrumentation of the root canals to the apex regardless of the emergency condition than there was a decade ago. The number of respondents who leave teeth open when the pulp is nonvital has dropped dramatically in the past decade. When there is no periapical involvement, over one third of the respondents are completing treatment in one visit. A decrease in the use of classic phenolic medicaments was noted with a corresponding increase in calcium hydroxide or no medication at all.

A comparison of erythromycin and cefadroxil in the prevention of flare-ups from asymptomatic teeth with pulpal necrosis and associated periapical pathosis

In a previous study by our group with patients having asymptomatic teeth with pulpal necrosis and an associated periapical radiolucent lesion (PN/PL), it was shown that prophylactic administration of penicillin V or erythromycin (high-dose, 1-day regimen) resulted in a low incidence of flare-up (mean = 2.2%) and a low incidence of swelling and pain not associated with flare-up. No hypersensitivity responses occurred, and gastrointestinal side effects were found primarily with the erythromycins. To ascertain whether a single-dose administration of a long-acting 1-gm tablet of the cephalosporin antibiotic cefadroxil would result in a similar outcome, the present study was undertaken with 200 patients having quiescent PN/PL. The patients were randomly given either cefadroxil or erythromycin (base or stearate). Evaluations of flare-up were done 1 day, 1 week, and 2 months after endodontic treatment. A 2.0% flare-up incidence was found, with no statistically significant differences for cefadroxil (1.0%), stearate (2.0%), or base (4.0%). No hypersensitivity responses occurred. Gastrointestinal side effects were found primarily with the erythromycins (19.0%). The results showed that a 1-gm, single-dose regimen of cefadroxil was as effective as erythromycin and penicillin in preventing flare-ups and serious sequelae. A comparative analysis of the data from our first study (no peritreatment antibiotics) and the pooled data from our last three investigations (including the current trial) showed that peritreatment antibiotic coverage significantly reduced flare-ups and serious sequelae after endodontic treatment of asymptomatic PN/PL (p less than 0.001).