Clinical outcomes, quality of life, and costs in the North Thames Dialysis Study of elderly people on dialysis: a prospective cohort study

Prognosis and management of chronic kidney disease (CKD) at the end of life

The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) increases with age. As people are living longer, nephrologists are responsible for a progressively older cohort of patients with substantial comorbidities. Patients with CKD have a significant symptom burden and can benefit from intervention and symptom control from an early stage in the illness. It is also increasingly recognised that renal replacement therapy may not always offer an improvement in symptoms or a survival advantage to older patients with high levels of comorbidity. For these reasons, non-dialytic (conservative) management and end-of-life care is becoming part of routine nephrology practice. Such patients will also frequently be encountered in other specialities, requiring generalists to have some renal-specific skills and knowledge. Although there have been significant advances in this field in recent years, the optimum model of care and some of the care preferences of patients remain challenges that need to be addressed.

Clinical outcomes in elderly patients on chronic peritoneal dialysis: a retrospective study from a single center in china

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes and identify the predictors of mortality in elderly patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included all incident CAPD patients treated at our center from 2006 to 2009. Demographic and clinical data on initiation of CAPD and clinical events during the study period were collected. Survival probabilities were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and risk factors for mortality were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Of 805 patients on CAPD, the elderly group (≥65 years; mean age: 71.3 ± 4.3 years) consisted of 148 patients, and the younger group (<65 years; mean age: 43.1 ± 12.2years) consisted of 657 patients. The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year patient survival rates were 97%, 92%, 88%, and 73% for the younger group, and 79%, 67%, 56%, and 30% for elderly group. The patient survival rates were significantly lower for the elderly group than for the younger group (p = 0.000). However, technique survival did not significantly differ between the groups (p = 0.559). In the patients overall, the independent predictors of death were old age (p = 0.003), diabetes (p = 0.000), cardiovascular disease (p = 0.006), lower hemoglobin (p = 0.010), and lower serum albumin (p = 0.024). Mortality in the elderly patients was associated with advanced age [relative risk (RR): 1.088; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.027 to 1.153; p = 0.004], diabetes (RR: 2.064; 95% CI: 1.236 to 3.445; p = 0.006), and lower serum albumin (RR: 0.940; 95% CI: 0.897 to 0.985; p = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

The elderly patients on CAPD experienced technique survival comparable with that of younger patients, but their patient survival was lower. In elderly patients, mortality was determined predominantly by greater age, diabetes, and lower serum albumin. Our results indicate that chronic peritoneal dialysis is a viable dialysis option for elderly patients with end-stage renal disease. Better management of hypoalbuminemia and comorbid conditions might improve survival in elderly PD patients.

Quality of life in dialysis: A Malaysian perspective

There is a growing interest to use quality of life as one of the dialysis outcome measurement. Based on the Malaysian National Renal Registry data on 15 participating sites, 1569 adult subjects who were alive at December 31, 2012, aged 18 years old and above were screened. Demographic and medical data of 1332 eligible subjects were collected during the administration of the short form of World Health Organization Quality of Life questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF) in Malay, English, and Chinese language, respectively. The primary objective is to evaluate the quality of life among dialysis patients using WHOQOL-BREF. The secondary objective is to examine significant factors that affect quality of life score. Mean (SD) transformed quality of life scores were 56.2 (15.8), 59.8 (16.8), 58.2 (18.5), 59.5 (14.6), 61.0 (18.5) for (1) physical, (2) psychological, (3) social relations, (4) environment domains, and (5) combined overall quality of life and general health, respectively. Peritoneal dialysis group scored significantly higher than hemodialysis group in the mean combined overall quality of life and general health score (63.0 vs. 60.0, P < 0.001). Independent factors that were associated significantly with quality of life score in different domains include gender, body mass index, religion, education, marital status, occupation, income, mode of dialysis, hemoglobin, diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, cerebral vascular accident and leg amputation. Subjects on peritoneal dialysis modality achieved higher combined overall quality of life and general health score than those on hemodialysis. Religion and cerebral vascular accident were significantly associated with all domains and combined overall quality of life and general health.

Survival after dialysis discontinuation and hospice enrollment for ESRD

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Textbooks report that patients with ESRD survive for 7-10 days after discontinuation of dialysis. Studies describing actual survival are limited, however, and research has not defined patient characteristics that may be associated with longer or shorter survival times. The goals of this study were to determine the mean life expectancy of patients admitted to hospice after discontinuation of dialysis, and to identify independent predictors of survival time.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Data for demographics, clinical characteristics, and survival were obtained from 10 hospices for patients with ESRD who discontinued dialysis before hospice admission. Data were collected for patients admitted between January 1, 2008 and May 15, 2012. All hospices were members of the Coalition of Hospices Organized to Investigate Comparative Effectiveness network, which obtains de-identified data from an electronic medical record.

RESULTS

Of 1947 patients who discontinued dialysis, the mean survival after hospice enrollment was 7.4 days (range, 0-40 days). Patients who discontinued dialysis had significantly shorter survival compared with other patients (n=124,673) with nonrenal hospice diagnoses (mean survival 54.4 days; hazard ratio, 2.96; 95% confidence interval, 2.82 to 3.09; P<0.001). A Cox proportional hazards model identified seven independent predictors of earlier mortality after dialysis discontinuation, including male sex, referral from a hospital, lower functional status (Palliative Performance Scale score), and the presence of peripheral edema.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who discontinue dialysis have significantly shorter survival than other hospice patients. Individual survival time varies greatly, but several variables can be used to predict survival and tailor a patient's care plan based on estimated prognosis.

Prognosis of elderly Japanese patients aged ≥80 years undergoing hemodialysis

Although the number of elderly patients requiring dialysis has increased, data regarding the prognosis of elderly patients undergoing hemodialysis are limited. In the present study, prognosis in Japanese hemodialysis patients aged ≥80 years was evaluated. From January 1988 to July 2013, 1144 consecutive patients with end-stage renal disease required renal replacement therapy at our institution; of these, 141 were aged ≥80 years. These patients' charts were retrospectively reviewed for relevant clinical variables and survival time. The life expectancies table from the National Vital Statistics database was used, and prognostic factors were assessed by multivariate analysis. In total, 107 deaths (76%) were recorded during the study period. The median survival time and estimated life-shortening period in the patients were 2.6 years and -5.3 years, respectively. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status and hemoglobin level were revealed as prognostic factors in the multivariate analysis. Estimates of prognosis and prognostic factors may provide useful information for physicians as well as elderly patients with end-stage kidney disease.

Causes of death in peritoneal dialysis patients with different kidney diseases and comorbidities: a retrospective clinical analysis in a Chinese center

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study is to identify and compare the different causes of death among peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients varying in baseline characteristics, including gender, age, primary diseases, and comorbidities and to assess risk factors for first-year death.

METHODS

The clinical data of 179 PD patients who were regularly followed up in our hospital and died between January 2006 and February 2011 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Median age at PD catheter implantation was 73 years. The most common primary diseases leading to ESRD were diabetic nephropathy (DN; 26.3 %), chronic glomerulonephritis (CGN; 24.6 %), and hypertensive nephropathy (HN; 21.8 %). The main causes of death in the DN and CGN groups were infections (42.6 %) and cardiocerebrovascular accidents (34.1 %), respectively. Patients with systemic vasculitis (SV) had the highest mortality rate from infection (71.4 %). Cox regression model showed that, compared with patients with CGN, those who had primary disease of DN, renal amyloidosis, multiple myeloma, or vasculitis were at higher risk of first-year death. Cerebrovascular disease, chronic heart failure, and/or lower serum albumin at baseline were also risk factors for first-year death.

CONCLUSIONS

The main causes of death in PD patients with DN and CGN were infections and cardiocerebrovascular accidents, respectively. Risk factors for first-year death included the primary diseases, cerebrovascular diseases, chronic heart failure, and lower serum albumin at baseline.

Impact of living environment on 2-year mortality in elderly maintenance hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Studies on risk factors of mortality in elderly patients with hemodialysis usually focus on comorbidities, nutrition, and inflammation. Discussion on the correlation between living environment and mortality of these patients is limited.

METHODS

A total of 256 elderly hemodialysis patients participated in this 2-year prospective observational study. The subjects were divided into 2 subgroups based on whether they were living in Taipei Basin (n = 63) or not (n = 193). Demographic, hematological, nutritional, inflammatory, biochemical, and dialysis-related data were obtained for cross-sectional analysis. Causes of death and mortality rates were also analyzed for each subgroup.

RESULTS

Patients in the basin group had a higher incidence of combined protein-energy wasting and inflammation than those in the around basin group. At the end of the 2-year follow-up, 68 patients had died. Univariate binary logistic regression analysis revealed that a very advanced age, basin group, serum albumin levels, serum creatinine levels, non-anuria, and the complications of stroke and CAD were associated with 2-year mortality. Meanwhile, log high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels were not associated with 2-year mortality. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that basin group, serum albumin levels, and the complications of stroke and CAD were significant risk factors for 2-year mortality in these patients.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate that factors such as living in the Taipei Basin with higher air pollutant levels in elderly hemodialysis patients is associated with protein-energy wasting and inflammation, as well as 2-year mortality. These findings suggest that among this population, living environment is as important as comorbidities and nutrition. Furthermore, air pollution should be getting more attention especially in the overcrowding Basin topography.

The impact of nutritional status, physical function, comorbidity and early versus late start in dialysis on quality of life in older dialysis patients

BACKGROUND

For the majority of the older patients in dialysis, the treatment will be lifelong. Thus, quality of life (QoL) is a crucial outcome. Our aim was to assess the QoL of older Norwegian dialysis patients and to investigate the impact of early (estimated glomerular filtration rate, eGFR ≥10 mL/min) versus late (eGFR <10 mL/min) start in dialysis, comorbidity, nutritional status and physical capacity.

METHODS

A self-report questionnaire including SF-36 (QoL) and the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA; nutritional status) was mailed to all patients (n = 320) ≥75 years registered in the Norwegian Renal Registry (NRR) as being in dialysis by September 2009. Reply was received from 233 patients (73%). Medical data including comorbidities and eGFR at dialysis start (obtained for 194 patients) were retrieved from the NRR. Functional capacity was determined from the SGA.

RESULTS

Compared to reports from younger dialysis patients, our patients scored poorer on all SF-36 subscales. Early start in dialysis was registered for 52 patients, 142 patients started late, 51.4% were well nourished (SGA A), 32.3% moderately malnourished (SGA B) and 16.4% were severely malnourished (SGA C). No significant association between any SF-36 scores and early versus late start, nutritional status or comorbidity was found. Better physical function was significantly associated with better scores on all SF-36 scales.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that physical function is important to all QoL aspects. Increased focus on physical rehabilitation seems pertinent. Early start of dialysis treatment was not associated with better long term QoL scores.

High cost and low survival rate in high comorbidity incident elderly hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

The comorbidity index is a predictor of mortality in dialysis patients but there are few reports for predicting elderly dialysis mortality and national population-based cost studies on elderly dialysis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term mortality of incident elderly dialysis patients using the Deyo-Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and to assess the inpatient and outpatient visits along with non-dialysis costs.

METHODS

Data were obtained from catastrophic illness registration of the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Incident elderly dialysis patients (age ≥75 years) receiving hemodialysis for more than 90 days between Jan 1, 1998, and Dec 31, 2007, were included. Baseline comorbidities were determined one year prior to the first dialysis day according to ICD-9 CM codes. Survival time, mortality rate, hospitalization time, outpatient visit frequency, and costs were calculated for different age and CCI groups.

RESULTS

In 10,759 incident elderly hemodialysis patients, hazard ratios for all-cause mortality were significantly increased in the different age groups (p < 0.001) and CCI patients (p < 0.001). Death rates increased with both increasing age and CCI score. High comorbidity incident hemodialysis and elderly patients were found to have increased length of hospital stay and total hospitalization costs.

CONCLUSIONS

This population-based cohort study indicated that both age and higher CCI values were predictors of survival in incident elderly hemodialysis. Increased costs and mortality rates were evident in the oldest patients and in those with high CCI scores. Conservative treatment might be considered in high comorbidity and low-survival rate end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients.

Dialysis outcomes in those aged ≥65 years

Background

The number of elderly people over the age of 65 commencing dialysis in NZ has increased by almost 400% in the past decade. Few data are available about health related outcomes and survival on dialysis in the elderly to help the individual, their family, clinicians and health planners with decision-making.

Methods/design

This study will provide the first comprehensive longitudinal survey of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and other patient centred outcomes for individuals aged ≥65 years on, or eligible for, dialysis therapy and will link these data to survival outcomes. Data collected by yearly structured interviews with participants will be linked to co-morbidity data, health service use, and laboratory information collected from health records, and analysed with respect to HRQOL and survival. The information obtained will inform the delivery of dialysis services in New Zealand and facilitate improved decision-making by individuals, their family and clinicians, about the appropriateness and impact of dialysis therapy on subsequent health and survival.

Discussion

Results from this study will make possible more informed decision-making by future elderly patients and their families as they contemplate renal replacement therapy. Results will also allow health professionals to more accurately describe the impact of dialysis therapy on quality of life and outcomes for patients.

Trial registration

ACTRN12611000024943.

The new comorbidity index for predicting survival in elderly dialysis patients: a long-term population-based study

Background

The worldwide elderly (≥65 years old) dialysis population has grown significantly. This population is expected to have more comorbid conditions and shorter life expectancies than the general elderly population. Predicting outcomes for this population is important for decision-making. Recently, a new comorbidity index (nCI) with good predictive value for patient outcomes was developed and validated in chronic dialysis patients regardless of age. Our study examined the nCI outcome predictability in elderly dialysis patients.

Methods and Findings

For this population-based cohort study, we used Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database of enrolled elderly patients, who began maintenance dialysis between January 1999 and December 2005. A total of 21,043 incident dialysis patients were divided into 4 groups by nCI score (intervals ≤3, 4–6, 7–9, ≥10) and followed nearly for 10 years. All-cause mortality and life expectancy were analyzed. During the follow-up period, 11272 (53.55%) patients died. Kaplan-Meier curves showed significant group difference in survival (log-rank: P<0.001). After stratification by age, life expectancy was found to be significantly longer in groups with lower nCI scores.

Conclusion

The nCI, even without the age component, is a strong predictor of mortality in elderly dialysis patients. Because patients with lower nCI scores may predict better survival, more attention should paid to adequate dialysis rather than palliative care, especially in those without obvious functional impairments.

[Assisted peritoneal dialysis: home-based renal replacement therapy for the elderly patient]

The number of elderly patients with end stage renal disease is constantly increasing. Conventional hämodiaylsis as the mainstay of renal replacement therapy is often poorly tolerated by frail eldery patients with multiple comorbidities. Although many of these patients would prefer a home based dialysis treatment, the number of elderly patients using peritoneal dialysis (PD) is still low. Impaired physical and cognitive function often generates insurmountable barriers for self care peritoneal dialysis. Assisted peritoneal dialysis can overcome many of these barriers and give elderly patients the ability of a renal replacement therapy in their own homes respecting their needs.

The clinical status and survival in elderly dialysis: example of the oldest region of France

BACKGROUND

The number of elderly (≥75 years) patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has increased markedly, including in the Limousin region, which has the oldest population in France. We retrospectively compared outcomes in elderly and non-elderly ESRD patients who started dialysis during two time periods.

METHODS

Baseline clinical characteristics, care, and survival rates were assessed in 557 ESRD patients aged ≥75 and <75 years who started dialysis in 2002-2004 and 2005-2007. Survival curves and Cox proportional hazards model were used to assess survival and factors associated with survival.

RESULTS

Of the 557 patients, 343 and 214 were <75 years and ≥75 years, respectively. Dialysis was started in 2002-2004 and 2005-2007 by 197 and 146 patients <75 years, respectively, and by 96 and 118 patients ≥75 years, respectively. Median age (73.4 years [interquartile range [IQR] 61.7-79.5 years] vs 69.5 years [IQR 57.4-77.4 years] p = 0.001) and the proportion aged ≥75 years (44.7% vs 32.8%, p = 0.004) were significantly higher in 2005-2007 than in 2002-2004. Improved initial status during 2005-2007 was observed only in patients ≥75 years, with a decrease in some co-morbidities, improved walking and better preparation for dialysis. Mortality rates were significantly lower in 2005-2007 than in 2002-2004 (hazard ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.69-0.95; p = 0.008), with the difference due to factors associated with clinical status and care.

CONCLUSIONS

Improved initial clinical status and better preparation for dialysis, accompanied by increased survival, were observed for patients ≥75 years who started dialysis more recently, perhaps because of early referral to a nephrologist.

Re-envisioning Fistula First in a patient-centered culture

The main options for vascular access in hemodialysis patients are arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs), arteriovenous grafts, and tunneled cuffed central venous catheters. AVFs have the lowest complication rate and require the fewest interventions and lowest cost to maintain. There has been a dramatic national increase in prevalent AVFs among patients with ESRD in the United States driven, in part, by the Fistula First Breakthrough Initiative. The Fistula First Breakthrough Initiative has engaged stakeholders in the dialysis community to disseminate best practices and quality improvement activities to increase AVF prevalence in suitable candidates. In the pursuit of maximizing AVF placement and prevalence, less emphasis has been placed on the individual patient context. An AVF may not be the best access choice in a subset of patients, particularly those with poor long-term prognoses or comorbid chronic diseases with a short life expectancy, those patients more likely to die than to have their CKD progress to ESRD requiring dialysis, and those with vascular anatomy not amenable to successful AVF placement. Placement of an AVF in these patients subjects them to uncomfortable and likely unnecessary and/or unsuccessful surgeries at an expense, while doing little to improve their clinical outcome or their individual experience of care. AVF prevalence as a pay-for-performance measure without the appropriate case-mix adjustment may penalize providers for accepting higher-risk patients. Although a functioning AVF that provides reliable hemodialysis remains the gold standard for vascular access for most patients, it may not be the most suitable option for every patient.

Intensive hemodialysis in the (nursing) home: the bright side of geriatric ESRD care?

Elderly ESRD patients often lose functionality when they start dialysis, which may be due to a variety of clinical problems. We recently postulated that intensive (longer and/or more frequent) hemodialysis (HD) may be the ideal strategy to try to prevent these ESRD- and dialysis-related complications, including dialysis-induced hypotension, cardiac and cerebral events, malnutrition, infections, sleep problems, and psychological issues. The feasibility of home dialysis therapies has been demonstrated in observational studies. As self-care dialysis is often a challenge in the elderly patient, assisted intensive home HD may facilitate the long-term continuation of this modality. Intensive nursing home HD seems to be an attractive goal for the future because many elderly ESRD patients reside in an extended care facility. Combination with rehabilitation and support by social worker and psychologist remains crucial in the holistic approach toward the elderly ESRD patient. Further studies are required to test the potential protective effects of intensive HD on functionality and quality of life in elderly ESRD patients, and to elucidate the mechanisms underlying frailty and other geriatric syndromes in this highly vulnerable patient population.

Aging and ESRD demographics: consequences for the practice of dialysis

The disproportionate increase in the prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the elderly is now recognized as a national and global reality. Among the major contributing factors are the aging of the population, a growing prevalence of CKD, greater access to care, and increased comorbidities. The utilization of renal replacement therapy in the geriatric population has concomitantly increased. It is imposing enormous challenges to the practice of ESRD care, the largest of which may be to determine the best application of clinical performance targets to a population with limitations in life expectancy. Concurrently, increased focus on quality of life will be required. The effective dialysis practitioner will need to adapt to the aging ESRD demographics with an increased focus on physical and mental well-being of the geriatric patient.

Complications observed in older new haemodialysis patients in Taiwan

AIM

We aimed to evaluate the impacts of heomodialysis (HD) in older patients, and potential consequences of adverse events for health insurance costs.

METHODS

Two hundred and fifty-five new patients (130 were younger than 65 years and 125 were older than 65 years) who had received conventional HD for at least 1 year were reviewed.

RESULTS

Older patients had significantly more arteriovenous (AV) shunt failures (0.7 ± 0.1 vs 0.4 ± 0.07, P = 0.006) and hospitalisations (0.8 ± 0.1 vs 0.4 ± 0.09, P = 0.03) than younger ones. Stepwise multivariate linear regression analysis showed that AV shunt failure was an independent risk factor for hospitalisation.

CONCLUSIONS

The relatively high risk of AV shunt failures and hospitalisation in older patients highlights the additional expenditure on HD required in terms of health insurance.

Higher mortality among remote compared to rural or urban dwelling hemodialysis patients in the United States

Living far away from specialized care centers is a potential barrier to the delivery of quality health care and has been associated with adverse outcomes. To assess mortality as a function of distance from the closest hemodialysis unit, and as a function of rural rather than urban residence, we analyzed prospectively collected data on 726,347 adults initiating chronic hemodialysis in the United States over a 13-year period. Participants were classified into categories of 0-10 (referent), 11-25, 26-45, 46-100, and remote living over 100 miles from the closest hemodialysis unit. After a median follow-up of 2.7 years (range 0 to 12.7 years), 368,569 patients died. Compared to the referent group, the adjusted hazard ratio of death was 1.01, 0.99, 0.96, and 1.21, respectively. When residence location was classified using rural-urban commuter areas, 16.5, 66.8, and 16.7% of patients lived in urban, micropolitan, and metropolitan areas, respectively. Compared with those living in metropolitan areas, the adjusted hazard ratio of mortality among patients residing in micropolitan and rural communities was 1.02 and 1.01, respectively. Thus, remote but not rural residence was associated with increased mortality among patients initiating chronic hemodialysis treatment in the United States.

Systematic review of noncancer presentations with a median survival of 6 months or less

PURPOSE

We report on clinical indicators of 6-month mortality in advanced noncancer illnesses and the effect of treatment on survival.

METHODS

The MEDLINE database was searched comprehensively to find studies evaluating survival for common advanced noncancer illnesses. We retrieved and evaluated studies that reported a median survival of ≤1 year and evaluated prognostic factors or effect of treatment on survival. We extracted data on presentations with median survivals of ≤6 months for heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, geriatric failure to thrive, cirrhosis, and end-stage renal failure. Independent risk factors for survival were combined and included if their combination was associated with a 6-month mortality of ≥50%.

RESULTS

The search identified 1000 potentially relevant studies, of which 475 were retrieved and evaluated, and 74 were included. We report the common clinical presentations that are consistently associated with a 6-month median survival. Even though advanced noncancer syndromes differ clinically, a universal set of prognostic factors signals progression to terminal disease, including poor performance status, advanced age, malnutrition, comorbid illness, organ dysfunction, and hospitalization for acute decompensation. Generally, a 6-month median survival is associated with the presence of 2-4 of these factors. With few exceptions, these terminal presentations are quite refractory to treatment.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review summarizes prognostic factors common to advanced noncancer illness. There is little evidence at present that treatment prolongs survival at these terminal stages.

Renal replacement therapy in the elderly population

ESRD has become an important problem for elderly patients. The segment of the ESRD population age 65 years or older has grown considerably, and this growth is expected to accelerate in coming years. Nephrologists caring for the elderly with advanced kidney disease will encounter patients with comorbid conditions common in younger patients, as well as physical, psychological, and social challenges that occur with increased frequency in the aging population. These challenging factors must be addressed to help inform decisions regarding the option to initiate dialysis, the choice of dialysis modality, whether to pursue kidney transplantation, and end-of-life care. This article will highlight some common problems encountered by elderly patients with ESRD and review data on the clinical outcomes of elderly patients treated with different modalities of dialysis, outcomes of kidney transplantation in the elderly, and nondialytic management of CKD stage 5.

End-Stage Renal Disease and Renal Replacement Therapy in older Patients

As the world’s population continues to age, practitioners encounter increasing numbers of older patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who require renal replacement therapy (RRT). Conservative management may be considered in older patients and has been shown to offer comparable survival rates and hospital-free days to RRT patients. At present, for those who choose RRT, hemodialysis is the most commonly used modality. Many practitioners believe that peritoneal dialysis (PD), including assisted peritoneal dialysis, can be used safely in this population. Age is not a contra-indication to peritoneal dialysis, and a choice of modality should be offered to older patients. Assisted peritoneal dialysis has been used successfully in multiple regions without an increase in complication rates. Quality of life is an important issue for older patients with ESRD, and studies such as Broadening options for long-term Dialysis in the Elderly support the use of PD in older patients as it is associated with fewer fluctuations in symptoms of ESRD and less intrusion into people’s lives. This review discusses the appropriateness of initiating RRT in older patients, choices of modality, underutilization of PD in older patients, use of assisted PD, complication rates, and quality of life in these patients. overall, PD seems to be a safe and effective modality of RRT in older patients, and assisted PD can be used in patients with limited functional impairment.

Conservative management of end-stage renal disease without dialysis: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To summarize evidence on conservative, nondialytic management of end-stage renal disease regarding 1) prognosis and 2) symptom burden and quality of life (QOL).

METHODS

Medline, Cinahl, and Cochrane were searched for records indexed prior to March 1, 2011. Bibliographies of articles and abstracts from recent meetings were reviewed. Authors and nephrologists were contacted to identify additional studies. Articles were reviewed by two authors and selected if they described stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients managed without dialysis, including one or more of the following outcomes: prognosis, symptoms, or QOL. Levels of evidence ratings were assigned using the SORT (Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy) system. Data was abstracted independently by two authors for descriptive analysis.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included. In studies of prognosis, conservative management resulted in median survival of at least six months (range 6.3 to 23.4 months). Findings are mixed as to whether dialysis prolongs survival in the elderly versus conservative, nondialytic management. Any survival benefit from dialysis decreases with comorbidities, especially ischemic heart disease. Patients managed conservatively report a high symptom burden, underscoring the need for concurrent palliative care. Additional head-to-head studies are needed to compare the symptoms of age-matched dialysis patients, but preliminary studies suggest that QOL is similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Conservative management is an important alternative to discuss when counseling patients and families about dialysis. Unlike withdrawal of dialysis in which imminent death is expected, patients who decline dialysis initiation can live for months to years with appropriate supportive care.

Conservative management of end-stage renal disease without dialysis: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To summarize evidence on conservative, nondialytic management of end-stage renal disease regarding 1) prognosis and 2) symptom burden and quality of life (QOL).

METHODS

Medline, Cinahl, and Cochrane were searched for records indexed prior to March 1, 2011. Bibliographies of articles and abstracts from recent meetings were reviewed. Authors and nephrologists were contacted to identify additional studies. Articles were reviewed by two authors and selected if they described stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients managed without dialysis, including one or more of the following outcomes: prognosis, symptoms, or QOL. Levels of evidence ratings were assigned using the SORT (Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy) system. Data was abstracted independently by two authors for descriptive analysis.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included. In studies of prognosis, conservative management resulted in median survival of at least six months (range 6.3 to 23.4 months). Findings are mixed as to whether dialysis prolongs survival in the elderly versus conservative, nondialytic management. Any survival benefit from dialysis decreases with comorbidities, especially ischemic heart disease. Patients managed conservatively report a high symptom burden, underscoring the need for concurrent palliative care. Additional head-to-head studies are needed to compare the symptoms of age-matched dialysis patients, but preliminary studies suggest that QOL is similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Conservative management is an important alternative to discuss when counseling patients and families about dialysis. Unlike withdrawal of dialysis in which imminent death is expected, patients who decline dialysis initiation can live for months to years with appropriate supportive care.

Differences between dialysis modality selection and initiation

BACKGROUND

Although dialysis modality education is associated with higher rates of peritoneal dialysis (PD) use, some patients start hemodialysis (HD) therapy despite initially selecting PD as their modality of choice. This study seeks to identify predictors of this discrepancy.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

217 patients who received dialysis modality education at the University of Rochester between January 2004 and September 2009 and subsequently started dialysis therapy.

PREDICTORS

Demographic (age, race, sex, and timing of education), social (education, income, insurance, marital, employment, and smoking status), and clinical data (estimated glomerular filtration rate, cause of end-stage renal disease [ESRD], number of comorbid conditions, and number of nephrology visits).

OUTCOME

HD use at initiation and day 91 of dialysis therapy in patients initially selecting PD.

RESULTS

Of 217 patients receiving education and starting dialysis therapy, at the time of education, 124 chose PD, 52 were undecided, and 41 chose HD. Modality distribution at the time of dialysis therapy initiation was 150 with HD and 67 with PD. Of 124 patients who chose PD at the time of education, 59 started dialysis therapy with PD and 65 started with HD. On day 91, a total of 60 patients were on PD therapy and 55 were on HD therapy. Nine patients had either died, undergone transplant, or not yet reached 91 days of dialysis therapy. On multivariable analysis, nonglomerular cause of ESRD, age older than 75 years, and not being employed predicted starting with HD therapy, whereas age older than 75 years, nonwhite race, and nonglomerular cause of ESRD predicted HD use at day 91.

LIMITATIONS

Single-center observational study.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that patients choosing PD after dialysis education may not start with this modality and identifies several predictors of this mismatch. Further investigation into predictors of this discrepancy and strategies promoting a PD start in patients selecting this modality are warranted.

How to address barriers to peritoneal dialysis in the elderly

Older patients on dialysis have unique needs and characteristics and their outcomes vary from that of their younger counterparts. Comparatively fewer will start or be maintained on peritoneal dialysis (PD) compared to younger patients, despite the fact that hemodialysis is often poorly tolerated. Barriers to PD for older patients include poor vision, frailty, cognitive dysfunction, accommodation issues, and a bias from renal teams that older patients cannot do PD. The development of assisted PD can overcome many of these barriers. The ability of older patients to use PD as their dialysis modality should not be determined by whether they live in an area where the nephrologist is a PD enthusiast. All patients should be given nonbiased information so they can choose the dialysis modality that gives them the best quality of life and suits their and their family's lifestyle.

Management of chronic kidney disease in the elderly

Both chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease are strongly age related. Although the morbidity and mortality of CKD have significantly improved in recent years because of a greater understanding of its pathophysiology and evidence-based approach to management, the application of this evidence to the elderly CKD patients is often fraught with difficulty. This is because, besides age, the clinical and biological variables that are widely prevalent in the elderly, such as multiple co-morbidities, functional impairments and polypharmacy, and quality of life and functional outcome measures, which are pertinent to this age group, have generally not been incorporated into the available evidence. This paper reviews the current evidence with a view to providing a framework for diagnosing and managing CKD in the elderly. Special references are made to age-related physiological changes in the renal system, assessment of renal function, and management of metabolic complications and end-stage renal disease.

Dialysis options for end-stage renal disease in older people

The numbers of older patients requiring dialysis therapy is rising, reflecting the ageing of the general population. Older dialysis patients have a tendency to present later for dialysis, have a higher number of comorbid conditions, are at higher risk of cognitive dysfunction and have increased levels of frailty. These are all barriers to home dialysis therapy so hospital haemodialysis (HD) is the predominant dialysis modality for older patients. Evidence suggests, however, that home treatment with peritoneal dialysis (PD) intrudes less into the life of older patients than hospital HD. Assisted PD is available in some countries and this enables more older patients to be treated in their own homes. Adjustments to patient education also need to be made to accommodate the barriers to learning and decision-making that often exist in older people.

Peritoneal dialysis in an ageing population: a 10-year experience

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is becoming increasingly prevalent and there are increasing numbers of older patients with advanced CKD. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a potential treatment. This study aims to compare PD outcomes in age-defined populations in the largest PD centre in the Republic of Ireland over 10 years.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified all adult patients, over the age of 50 years, who commenced PD as their first modality of renal replacement therapy (RRT) between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 2008 at our institution. Primary outcome was patient survival; secondary outcomes were technique failure, peritonitis-free survival, transplantation and hospitalisations.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-eight patients with a mean age of 63 years were included. Twenty-two patients were on assisted PD, the majority of whom were aged 70 years or over (P = 0.001). There were no differences in patient survival or technique failure by age group, Charlson Co-Morbidity Index (CCI), modified-CCI or adjusted CCI. Renal transplantation occurred predominantly in younger patients (P = 0.001) with lower m-CCI (P = 0.001) and a-CCI (P = 0.002) who performed PD independently (P = 0.004). Older patients required longer hospital stays to initiate PD (P = 0.004). Assisted PD was not associated with an increase in early complications or technique failure but death rates were higher (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

This study shows PD to be an acceptable modality of renal replacement therapy in elderly patients, with no observed differences in survival, technique survival or complication rates. Co-morbidities appear to play a stronger role in predicting survival than age alone. Assisted PD is a viable option in those unable to undergo PD independently.

Impairment of kidney function and reduced quality-of-life in older people: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

to assess the association of kidney function with quality-of-life in community-dwelling older adults aged 75 years or more in the UK.

DESIGN

cross-sectional study.

SETTING

primary care; 12 UK general practices participating in a cluster trial of health screening.

SUBJECTS

estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, ml/min/1.73 m(2)) using the four-variable modified diet in renal disease equation was derived in 1,195 men and 1,772 women with available bloods, these were 92% of 3,211 study participants who consented to interviews and 73% of those invited into the original cluster trial of health screening.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

interviews by trained fieldworker using the Sickness Impact Profile (home management, mobility, self-care, social interaction), and the Philadelphia Geriatric Morale Scale. Higher scores imply worse quality-of-life in a given domain.

RESULTS

in age- and co-morbidity-adjusted analyses there was an association of eGFR <45 and the highest scores (defined as ≥median) of mobility (men: odds ratio (OR) 2.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.56-5.41; women: OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.02-2.94), home management (men: OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.09-2.04; women: OR 3.50, 95% CI 1.18-10.35), social interaction (men: OR 3.34, 95% CI 1.73-6.45; women: 2.64, 95% CI 1.61-4.33) when compared with those with eGFR ≥60 and who reported no problems. Men with eGFR <45 had low morale (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.02-5.87) but this was not found for women (OR 1.40, 95% CI 0.65-3.04), whereas women (but not men) with eGFR <45 reported problems with body care (women: OR 1.68; 95% CI 1.25-2.27: men: OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.55-1.46).

CONCLUSIONS

an eGFR <45 is associated with poorer quality-of-life at older age. More research is needed to identify modifiable causes to improve quality-of-life in older people with such a degree of kidney function impairment.

Should there be an expanded role for palliative care in end-stage renal disease?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we outline the rationale for expanding the role of palliative care in end-stage renal disease (ESRD), describe the components of a palliative care model, and identify potential barriers in implementation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients receiving chronic dialysis have reduced life expectancy and high rates of chronic pain, depression, cognitive impairment, and physical disability. Delivery of prognostic information and advance care planning are desired by patients, but occur infrequently. Furthermore, although hospice care is associated with improved symptom control and lower healthcare costs at the end of life, it is underutilized by the ESRD population, even among patients who withdraw from dialysis. A palliative care model incorporating communication of prognosis, advance care planning, symptom assessment and management, and timely hospice referral may improve quality of life and quality of dying. Resources and clinical practice guidelines are available to assist practitioners with incorporating palliative care into ESRD management.

SUMMARY

There is a large unmet need to alleviate the physical, psychosocial, and existential suffering of patients with ESRD. More fully integrating palliative care into ESRD management by improving end-of-life care training, eliminating structural and financial barriers to hospice use, and identifying optimal methods to deliver palliative care are necessary if we are to successfully address the needs of an aging ESRD population.