Whole brain radiation therapy with or without stereotactic radiosurgery boost for patients with one to three brain metastases: phase III results of the RTOG 9508 randomised trial

Single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy provide equal prognosis with overall survival in patients with brain metastases at diagnosis without surgery at primary site

Background and purpose

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) are both treatments shown to be effective in treating brain metastases (BMs). However, it is unknown how these treatments compare in effectiveness and safety in cancer patients with BMs regardless of the primary cancer. The main objective of this study is to investigate the SRS and SRT treatments' associations with the overall survival (OS) of patients diagnosed with BMs using the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

Materials and methods

Patients in the NCDB with breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, small cell lung cancer, other lung cancers, melanoma, colorectal cancer, or kidney cancer who had BMs at the time of their primary cancer diagnosis and received either SRS or SRT as treatment for their BMs were included in the study. We analyzed OS with a Cox proportional hazard analysis that adjusted variables associated with improved OS during univariable analysis.

Results

Of the total 6,961 patients that fit the criteria for the study, 5,423 (77.9%) received SRS and 1,538 (22.1%) received SRT. Patients who received SRS treatment had a median survival time of 10.9 (95% CI [10.5-11.3]), and those who received SRT treatment had a median survival time of 11.3 (95% CI [10.4-12.3]) months. This difference was not found to be significant (Log-rank P = 0.31). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis did not yield a significant difference between the treatments' associations with OS (Hazard Ratio: 0.942, CI 95% [0.882-1.006]; P = .08) or SRS vs. SRT.

Conclusions

In this analysis, SRS and SRT did not show a significant difference in their associations with OS. Future studies investigating the neurotoxicity risks of SRS as compared to SRT are warranted.

Efficacy of Stereotactic Radiosurgery as Single or Combined Therapy for Brain Metastasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

To determine the efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in treating patients with brain metastases (BMs), a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and a direct comparison of cohort studies were performed. Relevant literature regarding the effectiveness of SRS alone and in combination with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and surgery was retrieved using systematic database searches up to April 2019. The patterns of overall survival (OS), one-year OS, progression-free survival (PFS), one-year local brain control (LBC), one-year distant brain control (DBC), neurological death (ND), and complication rate were analyzed. A total of 18 RCTs and 37 cohorts were included in the meta-analysis. Our data revealed that SRS carried a better OS than SRS+WBRT (p= 0.048) and WBRT (p= 0.041). Also, SRS+WBRT demonstrated a significantly improved PFS, LBC, and DBC compared to WBRT alone and SRS alone. Finally, SRS achieved the same LBC as high as surgery, but intracranial relapse occurred considerably more frequently in the absence of WBRT. However, there were not any significant differences in ND and toxicities between SRS and other groups. Therefore, SRS alone may be a better alternative since increased patient survival may outweigh the increased risk of brain tumor recurrence associated with it.

The First Survival Score for Patients Treated with Whole-Brain Radiotherapy Plus Simultaneous Integrated Boost for Brain Metastases

A modern approach for brain metastases includes whole-brain radiotherapy plus simultaneous boost (WBRT+SIB). We developed a survival score in 128 patients treated with WBRT+SIB. Three models, each including three prognostic groups, were created. Positive predictive values (PPVs) for death ≤6 and survival ≥6 months were calculated. On multivariate analyses, performance score (KPS) and the number of brain metastases were significantly associated with survival. On univariate analyses, age showed a strong trend, and extra-cerebral cranial metastases a trend. In Model 1 (KPS, number of lesions), compared groups had 6-month survival rates of 15%, 38% and 57%. In Model 2 (KPS, lesions, age), rates were 17%, 33% and 75%, and in Model 3 (KPS, lesions, age, extra-cerebral metastases), 14%, 34% and 78%. PPVs for death ≤6 and survival ≥6 months were 85% and 57% (Model 1), 83% and 75% (Model 2), and 86% and 78% (Model 3). Thus, all models were accurate in predicting death ≤ 6 months; poor-prognosis patients may not benefit from SIB. Models 2 and 3 were superior in predicting survival ≥ 6 months. Given that Model 3 requires more data (including extensive staging), Model 2 is considered favorable for many patients. If extra-cerebral metastases are already known or extensive staging has been performed, Model 3 can also be used.

Unravelling oligometastatic disease from the perspective of radiation and medical oncology. Part II: prostate cancer and colorectal cancer

Oligometastatic disease (OMD) defines a status of cancer that is intermediate between localized and widely spread metastatic disease, and can be treated with curative intent. While imaging diagnostic tools have considerably improved in recent years, unidentified micrometastases can still escape from current detection techniques allowing disease to progress. The variety of OMD scenarios are mainly defined by the number of metastases, the biological and molecular tumour profiles, and the timing of the development of metastases. Increasing knowledge has contributed to the earlier and improved detection of OMD, underlining the importance of an early disease control. Based on increasing detection rates of OMD in the current real clinical practice and the lack of standardized evidence-based guidelines to treat this cancer status, a board of experts from the Spanish Societies of Radiation Oncology (SEOR) and Medical Oncology (SEOM) organized a series of sessions to update the current state-of-the-art on OMD from a multidisciplinary perspective, and to discuss how results from clinical studies may translate into promising treatment options. This experts' review series summarizes what is known and what it is pending clarification in the context of OMD in the scenarios of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Breast Cancer (Part I), and Prostate Cancer and Colorectal Cancer (Part II), aiming to offer specialists a pragmatic framework that might contribute to the improved management of patients.

Advances in Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases

Radiotherapy remains a cornerstone treatment of brain metastases. With new treatment advances, patients with brain metastases are living longer, and finding solutions for mitigating treatment-related neurotoxicity and improving quality of life is important. Historically, whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) was widely used but treatment options such as hippocampal sparing WBRT and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) have emerged as promising alternatives. Herein, we discuss the recent advances in radiotherapy for brain metastases including the sparing of critical structures that may improve long-term neurocognitive outcomes (eg, hippocampus, fornix) that may improve long-term neurocognitive outcome, evidence supporting preoperative and fractionated-SRS, and treatment strategies for managing radiation necrosis.

Unravelling oligometastatic disease from the perspective of radiation and medical oncology. Part I: non-small cell lung cancer and breast cancer

Oligometastatic disease (OMD) defines a cancer status that is intermediate between localized and widely spread metastatic disease, and can be treated with curative intent. While diagnostic imaging tools have considerably improved in recent years, unidentified micrometastases can still evade current detection techniques, allowing the disease to progress. The various OMD scenarios are mainly defined by the number of metastases, the biological and molecular tumour profiles, and the timing of the development of metastases. Increasing knowledge has contributed to the earlier and improved detection of OMD, underlining the importance of early disease control. In view of increasing OMD detection rates in current real-world clinical practice and the lack of standardized evidence-based guidelines to treat this cancer status, a board of experts from the Spanish Societies of Radiation Oncology (SEOR) and Medical Oncology (SEOM) organized a series of sessions to update the current state-of-the-art on OMD from a multidisciplinary perspective, and to discuss how results from clinical studies might translate into promising treatment options. This expert review series summarizes what is known and what it is pending clarification in the context of OMD in the scenarios of non-small cell lung cancer and breast cancer (Part I), and prostate cancer and colorectal cancer (Part II), aiming to offer specialists a pragmatic framework to help improve patient management.

Precision Radiation for Brain Metastases With a Focus on Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery

There are multiple published randomized controlled trials supporting single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SF-SRS) for patients presenting with 1 to 4 brain metastases, with the benefit of minimizing radiation-induced neurocognitive sequelae as compared to whole brain radiotherapy . More recently, the dogma of SF-SRS as the only means of delivering an SRS treatment has been challenged by hypofractionated SRS (HF-SRS). The ability to deliver 25-35 Gy in 3-5 HF-SRS fractions is a direct consequence of the evolution of radiation technologies to allow image guidance, specialized treatment planning, robotic delivery and/or patient positioning corrections in all 6 degrees-of-freedom, and frameless head immobilization. The intent is to mitigate the potentially devastating complication of radiation necrosis and improve rates of local control for larger metastases. This narrative review provides an overview of outcomes specific to HF-SRS in addition to the more recent developments of staged SRS, preoperative SRS, and hippocampal avoidance-whole brain radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost.

Development and validation of a unifying pre-treatment decision tool for intracranial and extracranial metastasis-directed radiotherapy

Background

Though metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) has the potential to improve overall survival (OS), appropriate patient selection remains challenging. We aimed to develop a model predictive of OS to refine patient selection for clinical trials and MDT.

Patients and methods

We assembled a multi-institutional cohort of patients treated with MDT (stereotactic body radiation therapy, radiosurgery, and whole brain radiation therapy). Candidate variables for recursive partitioning analysis were selected per prior studies: ECOG performance status, time from primary diagnosis, number of additional non-target organ systems involved (NOS), and intracranial metastases.

Results

A database of 1,362 patients was assembled with 424 intracranial, 352 lung, and 607 spinal treatments (n=1,383). Treatments were split into training (TC) (70%, n=968) and internal validation (IVC) (30%, n=415) cohorts. The TC had median ECOG of 0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 0-1), NOS of 1 (IQR: 0-1), and OS of 18 months (IQR: 7-35). The resulting model components and weights were: ECOG = 0, 1, and > 1 (0, 1, and 2); 0, 1, and > 1 NOS (0, 1, and 2); and intracranial target (2), with lower scores indicating more favorable OS. The model demonstrated high concordance in the TC (0.72) and IVC (0.72). The score also demonstrated high concordance for each target site (spine, brain, and lung).

Conclusion

This pre-treatment decision tool represents a unifying model for both intracranial and extracranial disease and identifies patients with the longest survival after MDT who may benefit most from aggressive local therapy. Carefully selected patients may benefit from MDT even in the presence of intracranial disease, and this model may help guide patient selection for MDT.

The oligometastatic setting in HNSCC: A critical review by the Rete Oncologica Piemonte e Valle d'Aosta multidisciplinary team

INTRODUCTION

The oligometastatic disease is a low burden metastatic disease that might still benefit from curable treatment. Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) is a complex group of malignancies, with high rates of loco-regional recurrences. Distant metastases are less frequent, and a single or few deposits are often observed (oligometastatic disease). The optimal management of oligometastatic HNSCC remains to be defined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Key references were derived from a PubMed query. Hand searching and clinicaltrials.gov were also used.

RESULTS

This paper contains a narrative report and a critical discussion of the available evidence on the management of oligometastatic HNSCC patients, with a focus on metastasis-directed therapy (MDT), particularly stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR).

CONCLUSIONS

in line with literature data, the multidisciplinary evaluation emerged as the key element in the management of oligometastatic HNSCC patients.

Impressive reduction of brain metastasis radionecrosis after cabozantinib therapy in metastatic renal carcinoma: A case report and review of the literature

Introduction

Radionecrosis is a consequence of SRS (stereotactic radiosurgery) for brain metastases in 34% of cases, and if symptomatic (8%-16%), it requires therapy with corticosteroids and bevacizumab and, less frequently, surgery. Oncological indications are increasing and appropriate stereotactic adapted LINACs (linear accelerators) are becoming more widely available worldwide. Efforts are being made to treat brain radionecrosis in order to relieve symptoms and spare the use of active therapies.

Case presentation

Herein, we describe a 65-year-old female patient presenting with brain radionecrosis 6 months after stereotactic radiotherapy for two brain metastatic lesions. Being symptomatic with headache and slow cognitive-motor function, the patient received corticosteroids. Because of later lung progression, the patient took cabozantinib. An impressive reduction of the two brain radionecrosis areas was seen at the brain MRI 2 months after the initiation of the angiogenic drug.

Discussion

The high incidence of radionecrosis (2/2 treated lesions) can be interpreted by the combination of SRS and previous ipilimumab that is associated with increased risk of radionecrosis. The molecular mechanisms of brain radionecrosis, and its exact duration in time, are poorly understood. We hypothesize that the antiangiogenic effect of cabozantinib may have had a strong effect in reducing brain radionecrosis areas.

Conclusion

In this clinical case, cabozantinib is associated with a fast and significant volume reduction of brain radionecrosis appearing after SRS and concomitant immunotherapy. This drug seems to show, like bevacizumab, clinical implications not only for its efficacy in systemic disease control but also in reducing brain radionecrosis. More research is needed to evaluate all molecular mechanisms of brain radionecrosis and their interaction with systemic therapies like third-generation TKIs.

Imaging of brain metastasis in non-small-cell lung cancer: indications, protocols, diagnosis, post-therapy imaging, and implications regarding management

Increased survival (due to the use of targeted therapies based on genomic profiling) has resulted in the increased incidence of brain metastasis during the course of disease, and thus, made it essential to have proper imaging guidelines in place for brain metastasis from non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Brain parenchymal metastases can have varied imaging appearances, and it is pertinent to be aware of the various molecular risk factors for brain metastasis from NSCLC along with their suggestive imaging appearances, so as to identify them early. Leptomeningeal metastasis requires additional imaging of the spine and an early cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis. Differentiation of post-therapy change from recurrence on imaging has a bearing on the management, hence the need for its awareness. This article will provide in-depth literature review of the epidemiology, aetiopathogenesis, screening, detection, diagnosis, post-therapy imaging, and implications regarding the management of brain metastasis from NSCLC. In addition, we will also briefly highlight the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in brain metastasis screening.

Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for the Treatment of Primary and Metastatic Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive treatment option for intracranial tumors that are challenging to treat via traditional methods; however, its safety and efficacy are not yet well validated in the literature. The objectives of the study were to assess the available evidence of the indications and adverse events (AEs) of LITT and 1-year progression-free survival and 1-year overall survival in the treatment of primary and secondary brain tumors.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted through the databases PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library until October 2021. Comparative and descriptive studies, except for case reports, were included in the meta-analysis. Separate analyses by tumor type (high-grade gliomas, including World Health Organization grade 4 astrocytomas [which include glioblastomas] as a specific subgroup; low-grade gliomas; and brain metastases) were conducted. Pooled effect sizes and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were generated via random-effects models.

RESULTS

Forty-five studies met the inclusion criteria, yielding 826 patients for meta-analysis. There were 829 lesions in total, of which 361 were classified as high-grade gliomas, 116 as low-grade gliomas, 337 as metastatic brain tumors, and 15 as nonglial tumors. Indications for offering LITT included deep/inaccessible tumor (12 studies), salvage therapy after failed radiosurgery (9), failures of ≥2 treatment options (3), in pediatric patients (4), patient preference (1); indications were nonspecific in 12 studies. Pooled incidence of all (minor or major) procedure-related AEs was 30% (95% CI, 27%-40%) for all tumors. Pooled incidence of neurologic deficits (minor or major) was 16% (12%-22%); postprocedural edema 14% (8%-22%); seizure 6% (4%-9%); hematoma 20% (14%-29%); deep vein thrombosis 19% (11%-30%); hydrocephalus 8% (5%-12%); and wound infection 5% (3%-7%). One-year progression-free survival was 18.6% (11.3%-29.0%) in high-grade gliomas, 16.9% (11.6%-24.0%) among the grade 4 astrocytomas; and 51.2% (36.7%-65.5%) in brain metastases. One-year overall survival was 43.0% (36.0%-50.0%) in high-grade glioma, 45.9% (95% CI, 37.9%-54%) in grade 4 astrocytomas; 93.0% (42.3%-100%) in low-grade gliomas, and 56.3% (47.0%-65.3%) in brain metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

New neurologic deficits and postprocedural edema were the most reported AEs after LITT, albeit mostly transient. This meta-analysis provides the best statistical estimates of progression and survival outcomes based on the available information. LITT is generally a safe procedure for selected patients, and future well-designed comparative studies on its outcomes versus the current standard of care should be performed.

Treatment Outcome of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Brain Metastasis from Thyroid Cancer: Favorable Local Control but Poor Survival

BACKGROUND

Brain metastasis from thyroid cancer (TCBM) is extremely rare; thus, despite a good treatment outcome for thyroid cancer, TCBM has shown poor clinical outcomes. Considering the short survival and poor general condition of patients with TCBM, stereotactic radiosurgery may be preferred to achieve local control.

METHODS

A total of 25 patients with TCBM who underwent Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKS) were initially included in this study; however, 3 patients were excluded because of a lack of data.

RESULTS

There were 7 men (31.8%) and 15 women (68.2%) and the mean age was 63.7 years. The most common type of thyroid cancer histology was papillary carcinoma. Fourteen patients (63.6%) harbored single brain metastatic tumor and 8 (36.3%) had multiple brain metastatic tumors. The mean duration from thyroid cancer diagnosis to detection of brain metastasis was 7.7 years (range, 0-23 years). The median dose of radiation of GKS was 22 Gy (range, 18-25 Gy). There was no radiation-induced complication after GKS. The median overall survival (OS) was 15 months and the 1-year OS of patients with TCBM was 63%, the 2-year OS was 38%, and the 5-year OS was 28%. The 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) for local recurrence of TCBM was 90.4%, the 1-year PFS was 84%, and the 3-year PFS was 84%.

CONCLUSIONS

GKS showed favorable local control for TCBM. However, the rate of distant brain metastasis was high and median survival of patients with TCBM was only 15 months.

Heterogeneity and Clinical Effect of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in Primary Lung and Brain Metastases of Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to analyze the heterogeneity in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutation and its impact on clinical outcomes in primary tumor and corresponding brain metastasis (BM) in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Primary pulmonary tumors and paired BMs of 27 NSCLC patients were surgically removed. All brain lesions were histologically confirmed as metastatic NSCLC. EGFR gene mutation status was detected by using amplification refraction mutation system. McNemar test was performed to compare EGFR mutation status between lung primary tumors and metastatic brain tumors and Kappa test was performed to quantify the agreement between the two.

RESULTS

Of the 27 patients, nine cases were found to have EGFR mutations in BMs and 10 had a positive EGFR mutation status in primary lung tumor tissue. The rate of consistency of the matched tumor was 24/27 (88.9%). Among the three cases presenting EGFR mutational heterogeneity, two patients harbored an EGFR mutation in the primary tumor but not in the BMs; meanwhile, the last patient demonstrated the opposite pattern. Compared to patients with consistent EGFR mutations, patients with inconsistent mutations showed better outcomes. Further analysis revealed that the two patients whose EGFR mutant-type primary tumor progressed to wild-type cerebral metastatic tumor had longer overall survival than the patient whose EGFR wild-type primary tumor progressed to mutant-type brain metastatic tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

Heterogeneity of EGFR mutation status was observed between primary NSCLC and paired BM. Patients possessing a wild-type EGFR mutation in BM might have better outcomes, especially those with transition from mutant to wild-type.

Brain Metastasis Growth Kinetics: A Novel Prognosticator for Stereotactic Radiotherapy

AIMS

The rate of size change in brain metastasis may have clinical implications on tumour biology and prognosis for patients who receive stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). We analysed the prognostic value of brain metastasis size kinetics and propose a model for patients with brain metastases treated with linac-based SRT in predicting overall survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analysed the patients receiving linac-based SRT between 2010 and 2020. Patient and oncological factors, including the changes in sizes of brain metastasis between the diagnostic and stereotactic magnetic resonance imaging, were collected. The associations between prognostic factors and overall survival were assessed using Cox regression with least absolute selection and shrinkage operator (LASSO) checked by 500 bootstrap replications. Our prognostic score was calculated by evaluating the most statistically significant factors. Patients were grouped and compared according to our proposed score, Score Index for Radiosurgery in Brain Metastases (SIR) and Basic Score for Brain Metastases (BS-BM).

RESULTS

In total, 85 patients were included. We developed the prognostic model based on the most important predictors of overall survival: growth kinetics, i.e. percentage change in brain metastasis size per day between the diagnostic and stereotactic magnetic resonance imaging (hazard ratio per 1% increase, 1.32; 95% confidence interval 1.06-1.65), extracranial oligometastatic diseases (≤5 involvements) (hazard ratio 0.28; 95% confidence interval 0.16-0.52) and the presence of neurological symptoms (hazard ratio 2.99; 95% confidence interval 1.54-5.81). Patients with scores 0, 1, 2 and 3 had a median overall survival of 44.4 (95% confidence interval 9.6-not reached), 20.4 (95% confidence interval 15.6-40.8), 12.0 (95% confidence interval 7.2-22.8) and 2.4 (95% confidence interval 1.2-not reached) years, respectively. The optimism-corrected c-indices for our proposed model, SIR and BS-BM were 0.65, 0.58 and 0.54, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Brain metastasis growth kinetics is a valuable metric for survival outcomes of SRT. Our model is useful in identifying patients with brain metastasis treated with SRT with different overall survival.

Comparison between the HyperArc™ technique and the CyberKnife® technique for stereotactic treatment of brain metastases

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the planimetric capacities between HyperArc™-based stereotactic radiosurgery and robotic radiosurgery system-based planning using CyberKnife® M6 for single and multiple cranial metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated 51 treatment plans for cranial metastases, including 30 patients with a single lesion and 21 patients with multiple lesions, treated with the CyberKnife® M6. These treatment plans were optimized using the HyperArc™ (HA) system with the TrueBeam. The comparison of the quality of the treatment plans between the two treatment techniques (CyberKnife and HyperArc) was performed using the Eclipse treatment planning system. Dosimetric parameters were compared for target volumes and organs at risk.

RESULTS

Coverage of the target volumes was equivalent between the two techniques, whereas median Paddick conformity index and median gradient index for all target volumes were 0.9 and 3.4, respectively for HyperArc plans, and 0.8 and 4.5 for CyberKnife plans (P<0.001). The median dose of gross tumor volume (GTV) for HyperArc and CyberKnife plans were 28.4 and 28.8, respectively. Total brain V18Gy and V12Gy-GTVs were 11cm³ and 20.2cm³ for HyperArc plans versus 18cm³ and 34.1cm³ for CyberKnife plans (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The HyperArc provided better brain sparing, with a significant reduction in V12Gy and V18Gy, associated with a lower gradient index, whereas the CyberKnife gave a higher median GTV dose. The HyperArc technique seems to be more appropriate for multiple cranial metastases and for large single metastatic lesions.

A new prognostic model for brain metastases of specific primary tumors with stereotactic radiotherapy

PURPOSE

Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) was widely used in brain metastases (BM), especially in oligometastases. It is imperative to develop a new prognostic score to predict the overall survival (OS) of brain metastases based on prognostic factors for specific primary tumors.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

One hundred and ninety-seven patients were involved in the training cohort to develop a new prognostic score to predict the overall survival (OS) of brain metastases for specific primary tumors. Independent prognostic factors were confirmed using a Cox regression model. The score was developed based on clinical prognostic factors of OS with Cox proportional hazards model. The result was validated in another cohort with 56 participants to evaluate the performance of the score.

RESULTS

One hundred and ninety-seven patients with 329 brain metastases received SRT. For NSCLC, the significant prognostic factors were extracranial metastases, target therapy and number of brain metastases. For gastrointestinal cancer, the significant prognostic factors were target therapy and number of brain metastases.

CONCLUSION

The prognostic factors scores were varied by the histologic types which can be used to efficiently stratify for selected patients with brain-metastasis.

Radiosurgery of limited brain metastases from primary solid tumor: results of the randomized phase III trial (NCT02355613) comparing treatments executed with a specialized or a C-arm linac-based platform

BACKGROUND

Comparative prospective data regarding different radiosurgery (SRS) modalities for treating brain metastases (BMs) from solid tumors are not available. To investigate with a single institute phase III randomized trial whether SRS executed with linac (Arm-B) is superior to a dedicated multi-source gamma-ray stereotactic platform (Arm-A).

METHODS

Adults patients with 1-4 BMs from solid tumors up to 30 mm in maximum diameter were randomly assigned to arms A and B. The primary endpoint was cumulative incidence of symptomatic (grade 2-3) radionecrosis (CIRN). Secondary endpoints were local progression cumulative incidence (CILP), distant brain failure, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 251 patients were randomly assigned to Arm-A (121) or Arm-B (130). The 1-year RN cumulative incidence was 6.7% in whole cohort, 3.8% (95% CI 1.9-7.4%) in Arm-B, and 9.3% (95% CI 6.2-13.8%) in the Arm-A (p = 0.43). CIRN was influenced by target volume irradiated only for the Arm-A (p << 0.001; HR 1.36 [95% CI 1.25-1.48]). Symptomatic RN occurred in 56 cases at a median time of 10.3 months (range 1.15-54.8 months), 27 in the Arm-B at a median time of 15.9 months (range 4.9-54.8 months), and 29 in the Arm-A at a median time of 6.9 months (1.2-32.3 months), without statistically significant differences between the two arms. No statistically significant differences were recorded between the two arms in CILP, BDF, DFS or OS. The mean beam-on time to deliver SRS was 49.0 ± 36.2 min in Arm-A, and 3.1 ± 1.6 min in Arm-B.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the technical differences between the treatment platforms investigated in this single-institution study, linac-based SRS (Arm-B) did not lead to significantly lower grade 2-3 RN rates versus the multi-source gamma-ray system (Arm-A) in a population of patients with limited brain metastases of small volume. No significant difference in local control was observed between both arms. For Arm-B, the treatment delivery time was significantly lower than for Arm-A.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02355613.

Radionecrosis (RN) in patients with brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and immunotherapy

OBJECTIVES

Limited data exist regarding radionecrosis (RN) rates when patients receive immunotherapy (IT) and SRS for brain metastases. This study assesses the influence of such treatments on the rate of RN.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 352 lesions from 105 patients with metastatic melanoma or NSCLC treated with SRS and IT from 2012 to 2018. Lesions were excluded from analysis if patients had received WBRT or prior GK to the same lesion, if RN occurred before IT, or if IT had been discontinued >6 months pre-SRS or initiated >1 year post-SRS. IT was delivered concurrently (±30 days of SRS) or sequentially. Overall survival and RN rates were assessed with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis were performed to identify characteristics predicting RN.

RESULTS

Of 195 lesions from 63 patients included in analysis, the median prescription dose, IDL, lesion volume, and maximum tumor dimension (MTD) were 19 Gy, 50%, 0.15 cc and 0.8 cm, respectively. RN rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 7.3%, 10.4% and 10.4%. On UVA, RN risk increased with, isodose volume (IDV), MTD, and tumor volume (TV) whereas conformity index was associated with a trend toward decreased RN risk. Two-year RN rates increased with TV ≥ 0.3 cc (16% vs 1.1% p = 0.001), MTD ≥ 1.3 cm (19.1% vs 1.8% p < 0.003), and IDV ≥ 1.5 cc (19.6% vs 1.7% p = 0.001). Concurrent vs sequential timing of IT did not predict for RN.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who received IT and SRS had acceptably low rates of RN. Timing of IT did not predict for RN. Further investigation is warranted to define RN risk with combined SRS and IT.

Stereotactic radiosurgery versus whole-brain radiotherapy after resection of solitary brain metastasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

The standard of care in patients with solitary brain metastasis involves surgical resection and postoperative whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). However, WBRT is associated with adverse effects, mainly neurocognitive deterioration. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a more targeted form of radiation therapy that could be as effective as WBRT without the detrimental neurocognitive decline.

Methods

We performed the first systematic review and meta-analysis comparing postoperative SRS versus postoperative WBRT in patients with one resected brain metastasis. PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane library were systematically searched for studies comparing the efficacy of the two radiation modalities in terms of local and distant brain control, leptomeningeal disease control, and overall survival. Additionally, we extracted patients' neurocognitive function and quality of life after each postoperative radiation form.

Results

Four studies with 248 patients (128: WBRT, 120: SRS) were included in our analysis. There was no difference between SRS and WBRT in the risk of local recurrence (RR = 0.92, CI = 0.51-1.66, p = 0.78, I2 = 0%) and leptomeningeal disease (RR = 1.21, CI = 0.49-2.98, p = 0.67, I2 = 18%), neither in the patients' overall survival (HR = 1.06, CI = 0.61-1.85, p = 0.83, I2 = 63%). Nevertheless, SRS appeared to increase the risk of distant brain failure (RR = 2.03, CI = 0.94-4.40, p = 0.07, I2 = 61%). Neurocognitive function and quality of life in the SRS group were equal or superior to the WBRT group.

Conclusions

Although SRS may increase the risk of distant brain failure, it appears to be as effective as WBRT in terms of local control, risk of leptomeningeal disease, and overall survival while sparing the patients of the detrimental, WBRT-associated cognitive deterioration.

Association of Brain Metastases With Survival in Patients With Limited or Stable Extracranial Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

Intracranial metastatic disease (IMD) is a severe complication of cancer with profound prognostic implications. Patients with IMD in the setting of limited or stable extracranial disease (IMD-SE) may represent a unique and understudied subset of patients with IMD with superior prognosis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and intracranial PFS (iPFS) in patients with IMD-SE secondary to any primary cancer.

DATA SOURCES

Records were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and gray literature sources from inception to June 21, 2021.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies in English reporting OS, PFS, or iPFS in patients with IMD-SE (defined as IMD and ≤2 extracranial metastatic sites) and no prior second-line chemotherapy or brain-directed therapy were selected.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Author, year of publication, type of study, type of primary cancer, and outcome measures were extracted. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate effect sizes, and subgroup meta-analysis and metaregression were conducted to measure between-study differences in February 2022.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary end point was OS described as hazard ratios (HRs) and medians for comparative and single-group studies, respectively. Secondary end points were PFS and iPFS.

RESULTS

Overall, 68 studies (5325 patients) were included. IMD-SE was associated with longer OS (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.39-0.70) and iPFS (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.52-0.76) compared with IMD in the setting of progressive extracranial disease. The weighted median OS estimate for patients with IMD-SE was 17.9 months (95% CI, 16.4-22.0 months), and for patients with IMD-PE it was 8.0 months (95% CI, 7.2-12.8 months). Pooled median OS for all patients with IMD-SE was 20.9 months (95% CI, 16.35-25.98 months); for the subgroup with breast cancer it was 20.2 months (95% CI, 10.43-38.20 months), and for non-small cell lung cancer it was 27.5 months (95% CI, 18.27-49.66 months). Between-study heterogeneity for OS and iPFS were moderate (I2 = 56.5%) and low (I2 = 0%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this systematic review and meta-analysis of patients with IMD-SE, limited systemic disease was associated with improved OS and iPFS. Future prospective trials should aim to collect granular information on the extent of extracranial disease to identify drivers of mortality and optimal treatment strategies in patients with brain metastases.

Dosimetric Impact of Lesion Number, Size, and Volume on Mean Brain Dose with Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Multiple Brain Metastases

We evaluated the effect of lesion number and volume for brain metastasis treated with SRS using GammaKnife^® ICON™ (GK) and CyberKnife^® M6™ (CK). Four sets of lesion sizes (<5 mm, 5-10 mm, >10-15 mm, and >15 mm) were contoured and prescribed a dose of 20 Gy/1 fraction. The number of lesions was increased until a threshold mean brain dose of 8 Gy was reached; then individually optimized to achieve maximum conformity. Across GK plans, mean brain dose was linearly proportional to the number of lesions and total GTV for all sizes. The numbers of lesions needed to reach this threshold for GK were 177, 57, 29, and 10 for each size group, respectively; corresponding total GTVs were 3.62 cc, 20.37 cc, 30.25 cc, and 57.96 cc, respectively. For CK, the threshold numbers of lesions were 135, 35, 18, and 8, with corresponding total GTVs of 2.32 cc, 12.09 cc, 18.24 cc, and 41.52 cc respectively. Mean brain dose increased linearly with number of lesions and total GTV while V8 Gy, V10 Gy, and V12 Gy showed quadratic correlations to the number of lesions and total GTV. Modern dedicated intracranial SRS systems allow for treatment of numerous brain metastases especially for ≤10 mm; clinical evidence to support this practice is critical to expansion in the clinic.

Outcomes of single brain metastasis treated with gamma knife stereotaxic radiosurgery(GKSR). Our experience on 103 cases

Background

Brain metastases (BM) occur in the natural course of malignant tumors in 18-40% of cases. Their management has changed considerably over the past decade thanks to the advent of Gamma knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery (GKSR).

Objective

We report our experience on Single Brain metastasis treated with (GKSR).

Methods

Patients treated by Gamma Knife stereotaxic radiosurgery (GKSR) in our institution between 2009 and 2021 for Single BM were recorded retrospectively.

Results

A total of 103 patients (n = 52; 50.5% females) were included, with a mean age of 56.33 ± 11.33. Breast (n = 39, 37.9%) and lung (n = 36, 35%) were the common original location for the primary tumors. GKSR alone without prior surgery, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy was achieved in 81.5% (n = 84). Thirteen patients (15.1%) progressed in BM volume while finding the appearance of de novo BM in 5 (5.8%) patients. The median percentage of tumor control after radiosurgery treatment was 70% (IQR: 65-78) and only 26.2% (n = 27) of patients had > 80% tumor control and stability over the median follow-up time of 5 (95% CI, 4-6) months. We found only two cases of radionecrosis (1.9%). The median survival time was 5.21 (IQR, 3-8) months. Retreatment, recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class, and tumor stability influenced the overall survival of BM respectively (Hazard Ratio adjust (HRa)= 5.610,p = 0.045; HRa= 6.133,p = 0.031; HRa= 22.463, p = 0.036).

Conclusion

Stereotaxic Radiosurgery provides good results in terms of Overall survival with fewer neurocognitive disorders.RPA class and tumor control (stability) influenced the overall survival of single BM.

Dosimetric Parameters in Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases: Do Flattening Filter-Free Beams Bring Benefits? A Preliminary Study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the dosimetric results of flattening filter-free (FFF) vs. flattened (FF) treatment plans for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT), with the goal to highlight potential advantages of FFF beams.

METHODS

A group of 18 patients with brain metastases treated with fSRT (30 Gy delivered in 5 fractions) were included. The dosimetric parameters evaluated were: (1) physical dosimetric parameters (number of monitor units (MUs), conformity index (CI), dose gradient index (DGI), beam on time (BOT)); (2) clinical dosimetric parameters pertaining to target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs). Two treatment plans were performed for all patients: one used 6 MV FFF beams and the other used 6 MV flattened beams.

RESULTS

A slight increase in MUs was observed for the FFF mode (+23.3 MUs). The CI showed a difference of -2.7% for the FF plans (p = 0.28), correlated with a poorer coverage of the PTV. DGI values reported in terms of PTV are in line with international recommendations and showed a +1.9% difference for FFF plans. An average BOT of 90.3 s was reported for FFF plans, which was 2.3 times shorter than that required for FF plans delivery (p ≤ 0.001). A slight decrease of PTV coverage (-1.26%, p = 0.036) for FF plans can be considered relevant, but no other significant differences were observed between the two optimizations. No statistically significant benefit of using FFF beams to reduce V₂₀ for normal brain could be demonstrated.

CONCLUSION

These dosimetric results encourage the implementation of fSRT with standard flattened beams in centers where FFF linacs are not available.

Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Irradiation of Surgical Cavity of Brain Metastases: Factor Analysis and Gene Mutations

(1) Background: Surgical resection for the removal of brain metastases often fails to prevent tumor recurrence within the surgical cavity; hence, researchers are divided as to the benefits of radiation treatment following surgical resection. This retrospective study assessed the effects of post-operative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) on local tumor control and overall survival. (2) Methods: This study examined the demographics, original tumor characteristics, and surgical outcomes of 97 patients who underwent Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKRS) treatment (103 brain metastases). Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox regression were used to correlate clinical features to tumor control and overall survival. (3) Results: The overall tumor control rate was 75.0% and overall 12-month survival was 89.6%. Tumor control rates in the radiation group versus the non-radiation group were as follows: 12 months (83.1% vs. 57.7%) and 24 months (66.1% vs. 50.5%). During the 2-year follow-up period after SRS, the intracranial response rate was higher in the post-craniotomy radiation group than in the non-radiation group (p = 0.027). Cox regression multivariate analysis determined that post-craniotomy irradiation of the surgical cavity is predictive of tumor control (p = 0.035). However, EGFR mutation was not predictive of overall survival or tumor control. (4) Conclusions: Irradiating the surgical cavity after surgery can enhance local tumor control; however, it does not have a significant effect on overall survival.

Geometric and dosimetric consequences of intra-fractional movement in single isocenter non-coplanar stereotactic radiosurgery

PURPOSE

To investigate the geometric and dosimetric impacts of intra-fractional movement for patients with single or multiple brain metastasis treated using Varian Hyperarc™ mono-isocentric radiosurgery.

METHODS

A total of 50 single or hypo-fractionated Hyperarc™ treatment courses (118 lesions) were included in the analysis. Intra-fractional translational and rotational movements were quantified according to the post-treatment cone-beam CT (CBCT). Geometric displacements of all targets were calculated individually based on the assessed head movement in each treatment fraction and their relationships with treatment time and target-to-isocenter distances were studied. For dosimetric analysis, only single-fraction treatments (56 lesions) were included. Re-planning was performed with 0, 1, and 2 mm planning target volume (PTV) margins. Doses were then re-calculated on rotated CT images with isocenter shifted which emulate the change in patient treatment position. Target coverage, target and normal brain doses before and after intra-fractional movement were compared.

RESULTS

The mean 3D target displacements was 0.6 ± 0.3 (SD) mm. Target shifts for patients treated within 10 min were significantly smaller than those treated in longer sessions. No correlation was found between target shift and target-to-isocenter distance as the origin of head rotation was not located at the isocenter. Loss of target coverage and minimum Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) dose due to intra-fractional movement were apparent only when no margin was used, leading to an extra 23% of the targets violating the dose acceptance criteria, in contrast, the effects on normal brain V12Gy were negligible regardless of the margin used. The use of 1 mm PTV margin can compensate clinically significant geographical miss caused by intra-fractional movements while limiting V12Gy to within dose criteria for 88% of the cases. The plan acceptance rate (fulfillment of both target and normal brain dose criteria) after intra-fractional movement was also the highest with the 1 mm margin.

CONCLUSION

Although intra-fractional movements during Hyperarc™ treatments were small, there were substantial dosimetric effects due to the sharp dose fall-off near target boundaries. These effects could be mitigated by using a 1 mm PTV margin and maintaining the effective treatment time to within 10 min.

Stereotactic radiosurgery in brain metastasis: treatment outcomes and patterns of failure

Introduction:

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become a preferred treatment in the initial management of brain metastases (BM). This study reported treatment outcomes and identified the patient, tumour, and treatment-related factors that predict failure, survival, and brain necrosis (BN).

Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of all BM patients treated with SRS. Patient, tumour characteristics and treatment details data were collected. All recurrences and BN were defined in the neurooncological tumour board.

Results:

From December 2016 to April 2020, 148 patients were analysed. The median follow-up was 14·8 months (range 6–51). At the time of analyses, 72·3% of the patients were alive. Presence of initial neurological deficit (HR; 2·71 (1·07–6·9); p = 0·036) and prior RT (HR; 2·55 (1·28–5·09); p = 0·008) is associated with worse overall survival. The local recurrence rate was 11·5 %. The distant brain metastasis rate was 53·4 %. Leptomeningeal metastasis was seen in 11 patients (7·4%). Symptomatic BN was seen in 19 patients (12·8 %). Bigger lesions (13 versus 23 mm diameter; p = 0·034) and cavity radiosurgery are associated with more BN (63·2 % versus 36·8%; p: 0·004).

Conclusions:

Distant BM is the leading cause of CNS recurrences and, salvage SRS is possible. Due to the increasing risk of developing BN routine metastasectomy should be made with caution.

Natural history of lung squamous cell brain metastases in patients treated with radiosurgery: a thirty-year experience at a tertiary medical center

PURPOSE

In this study we report our 30-year experience in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment of lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) brain metastases (BMs). It will serve to provide detailed longitudinal outcomes and predictors of efficacy in treating LUSC-BMs with SRS.

METHOD

We retrospectively reviewed 51 patients and 109 tumors treated with SRS at our center between 1993 and 2022. Patient demographics, PDL1 genotype, immunotherapy use and mortality cause were recorded. Radiological and clinical outcomes were followed at 1-3-month intervals post-SRS. Cox-regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were performed in statistical analysis.

RESULTS

We included 37 male and 14 female patients (median age 62.7 years at BM diagnosis). Median overall survival (OS) time was 6.9 months, 6-month OS rate was 62.1%, and Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) was the only independent predictor. Median time for local control maintenance was 7.6 months, 6-month local control rate was 69.1%, with TKI as the only independent predictor. Median time to distant failure was 5.13 months, 6-month distant failure rate was 51.1%, and factors with significant impact included gender (p = 0.002), presence of extracranial metastases (p < 0.001), use of immunotherapy(p < 0.001), PDL1 genotype (p = 0.034), and total intracranial metastases number (p = 0.008). However, no definitive benefits of immunotherapy were identified in patients with higher PDL1 mutational tumors.

CONCLUSION

In this study we defined the natural history of disease progression and outcomes in SRS-treated LUSC-BM patients. We also identified predictors of OS and tumor control among these patients. The findings of this study will serve as a guide when counseling these patients for SRS.

Current treatment approaches for brain metastases in ALK/ROS1/NTRK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients present a high incidence of CNS metastases either at diagnosis or during the course of the disease. In this case, patients present with worse prognosis and are often excluded from clinical trials unless brain metastases are pre-treated or clinically stable.

AREAS COVERED

As a result of the discovery of several oncogenic drivers in ALK/ROS1/NTRK-positive NSCLC, targeted agents have been tested in several trials. We evaluate and compare the intracranial efficacy of available targeted agents in ALK/ROS1/NTRK-positive NSCLC based on subgroup analysis from pivotal trials.

EXPERT OPINION

Last-generation ALK inhibitors have shown slightly superior intracranial activity but pivotal trials do not consider the same endpoints for intracranial efficacy, therefore data are not comparable. Local treatments for BM including surgical resection, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and WBRT, should be integrated with systemic therapies basing on specific criteria like presence of oligoprogression or symptomatic progression.

A simplified non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy for the whole brain radiotherapy with hippocampus avoidance

Purpose

To evaluate the feasibility of using a simplified non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (NC-VMAT) and investigate its dosimetric advantages compared with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (C-VMAT) for hippocampal-avoidance whole brain radiation therapy (HA-WBRT).

Methods

Ten patients with brain metastase (BM) were included for HA-WBRT. Three treatment plans were generated for each case using IMRT, C-VMAT, and NC-VMAT, respectively.

Results

The dosimetric results of the three techniques complied roughly with the RTOG 0933 criteria. After dose normalization, the V_30Gy of whole brain planned target volume (WB-PTV) in all the plans was controlled at 95%. Homogeneity index (HI) of WB-PTV was significantly reduced in NC-VMAT (0.249 ± 0.017) over IMRT (0.265 ± 0.020, p=0.005) and C-VMAT (0.261 ± 0.014, p=0.020). In terms of conformity index (CI), NC-VMAT could provide a value of 0.821 ± 0.010, which was significantly superior to IMRT (0.788 ± 0.019, p<0.001). According to D_2% of WB-PTV, NC-VMAT could provide a value of 35.62 ± 0.37Gy, significantly superior to IMRT (36.43 ± 0.65Gy, p<0.001). According to D_50% of WB-PTV, NC-VMAT can achieve the lowest value of 33.18 ± 0.29Gy, significantly different from IMRT (33.47 ± 0.43, p=0.034) and C-VMAT (33.58 ± 0.37, p=0.006). Regarding D_2%, D_98%, and D_mean of hippocampus, NC-VMAT could control them at 15.57 ± 0.18Gy, 8.37 ± 0.26Gy and 11.71 ± 0.48Gy, respectively. D_2% and D_mean of hippocampus for NC-VMAT was significantly lower than IMRT (D_2%: 16.07 ± 0.29Gy, p=0.001 D_mean: 12.18 ± 0.33Gy, p<0.001) and C-VMAT (D_2%: 15.92 ± 0.37Gy, p=0.009 D_mean: 12.21 ± 0.54Gy, p<0.001). For other organs-at-risk (OARs), according to D_2% of the right optic nerves and the right lenses, NC-VMAT had the lowest values of 31.86 ± 1.11Gy and 7.15 ± 0.31Gy, respectively, which were statistically different from the other two techniques. For other organs including eyes and optic chiasm, NC-VMAT could achieve the lowest doses, different from IMRT statistically.

Conclusion

The dosimetry of the three techniques for HA-WBRT could roughly comply with the proposals from RTOG 0933. After dose normalization (D_95%=30Gy), NC-VMAT could significantly improve dose homogeneity and reduce the D_50% in the brain. Besides, it can reduce the D_2% of the hippocampus, optic nerves, and lens. With this approach, an efficient and straightforward plan was accomplished.

Growth dynamics of brain metastases differentiate radiation necrosis from recurrence

Background

Radiation necrosis (RN) is a frequent adverse event after fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) or single-session stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment of brain metastases (BMs). It is difficult to distinguish RN from progressive disease (PD) due to their similarities in the magnetic resonance images. Previous theoretical studies have hypothesized that RN could have faster, although transient, growth dynamics after FSRT/SRS, but no study has proven that hypothesis using patient data. Thus, we hypothesized that lesion size time dynamics obtained from growth laws fitted with data from sequential volumetric measurements on magnetic resonance images may help in discriminating recurrent BMs from RN events.

Methods

A total of 101 BMs from different institutions, growing after FSRT/SRS (60 PDs and 41 RNs) in 86 patients, displaying growth for at least 3 consecutive MRI follow-ups were selected for the study from a database of 1031 BMs. The 3 parameters of the Von Bertalanffy growth law were determined for each BM and used to discriminate statistically PDs from RNs.

Results

Growth exponents in patients with RNs were found to be substantially larger than those of PD, due to the faster, although transient, dynamics of inflammatory processes. Statistically significant differences (P < .001) were found between both groups. The receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC = 0.76) supported the ability of the growth law exponent to classify the events.

Conclusions

Growth law exponents obtained from sequential longitudinal magnetic resonance images after FSRT/SRS can be used as a complementary tool in the differential diagnosis between RN and PD.

Association of Long-term Outcomes With Stereotactic Radiosurgery vs Whole-Brain Radiotherapy for Resected Brain Metastasis: A Secondary Analysis of The N107C/CEC.3 (Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology/Canadian Cancer Trials Group) Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Long-term outcomes of radiotherapy are important in understanding the risks and benefits of therapies for patients with brain metastases.

Objective

To determine how the use of postoperative whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is associated with quality of life (QOL), cognitive function, and intracranial tumor control in long-term survivors with 1 to 4 brain metastases.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This secondary analysis of a randomized phase 3 clinical trial included 48 institutions in the US and Canada. Adult patients with 1 resected brain metastases but limited to those with 1 to 4 brain metastasis were eligible. Unresected metastases were treated with SRS. Long-term survivors were defined as evaluable patients who lived longer than 1 year from randomization. Patients were recruited between July 2011 and December 2015, and data were first analyzed in February 2017. For the present study, intracranial tumor control, cognitive deterioration, QOL, and cognitive outcomes were measured in evaluable patients who were alive at 12 months from randomization and reanalyzed in June 2017.

Interventions

Stereotactic radiosurgery or WBRT.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Intracranial tumor control, toxic effects, cognitive deterioration, and QOL.

Results

Fifty-four patients (27 SRS arm, 27 WBRT arm; female to male ratio, 65% vs 35%) were included for analysis with a median follow-up of 23.8 months. Cognitive deterioration was less frequent with SRS (37%-60%) compared with WBRT (75%-91%) at all time points. More patients declined by 2 or more standard deviations (SDs) in 1 or more cognitive tests for WBRT compared with SRS at 3, 6, and 9 months (70% vs 22%, 46% vs 19%, and 50% vs 20%, respectively). A 2 SD decline in at least 2 cognitive tests was associated with worse 12-month QOL in emotional well-being, functional well-being, general, additional concerns, and total scores. Overall QOL and functional independence favored SRS alone for categorical change at all time points. Total intracranial control for SRS alone vs WBRT at 12 months was 40.7% vs 81.5% (difference, -40.7; 95% CI, -68.1% to -13.4%), respectively. Data were first analyzed in February 2017.

Conclusions and Relevance

The use of SRS alone compared with WBRT resulted in less cognitive deterioration among long-term survivors. The association of late cognitive deterioration with WBRT was clinically meaningful. A significant decline in cognition (2 SD) was associated with overall QOL. However, intracranial tumor control was improved with WBRT. This study provides detailed insight into cognitive function over time in this patient population.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01372774; ALLIANCE/CCTG: N107C/CEC.3 (Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology/Canadian Cancer Trials Group).

Incidence of Brain Metastases in Women Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Implications for Screening

PURPOSE

Patients with metastatic breast cancer may develop brain metastases. Our study identified high-risk patients to refine selection criteria for BM screening approaches.

PATIENTS

We reviewed breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) at a single university center between 2005 and 2019.

METHODS

Competing risks analysis was performed with the Fine and Gray model to analyze the cumulative incidence of BM and loco-regional recurrence. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. Multivariable analysis was performed with Cox proportional hazards regression to identify factors predictive for development of BM. Statistical significance was determined as a 2-sided P value of <.05.

RESULTS

In total, 112 patients experienced distant failure (DF) and 49 patients developed BM. Twenty patients with BM (41%) presented with symptoms requiring craniotomy +/- whole brain radiation treatment. Patients with BM were significantly more likely to have local (P < .01) and regional (P < .01) failure. On multivariable analysis, age <40 years (P = .011), presence of lung metastases (P < .0001), and residual nodal disease with >4 lymph nodes positive after NAC (P = .024) all predicted for increased likelihood of BM. Patients with these criteria had higher likelihoods of having BM (P = .013) and worse PFS (P = .044). On multivariable analysis for OS, presence of lung metastases was the most significant predictor of poor outcome (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

We propose a study of screening brain MRI for young (<40 years) patients with breast cancer receiving NAC and patients who develop metastatic disease post-NAC, especially those with lung involvement.

A simplified and effective off-axis Winston-Lutz for single-isocenter multi-target SRS

PURPOSE

To safely perform single-iso multi-target (SIMT) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), clinics must demonstrate SRS delivery accuracy for off-axis targets. The traditional Winston-Lutz (W-L) was widely adopted because it provides a simple and accurate solution for testing radiation-isocenter coincidence that uses a static target, enables testing arbitrary treatment angles, and does not require expensive commercial phantoms. The current noncommercial tests are cumbersome and insufficiently accurate. For an off-axis Winston-Lutz (OAWL) test, one must design MLC fields centered on off-axis targets. Unfortunately, because MLC leaf-interfaces are often misaligned with the target center, accomplishing this presents a nontrivial geometry problem that has not been previously solved in the literature. We present a solution for evaluating SIMT SRS accuracy that provides a straightforward method for creating OAWL test fields and offers all the benefits of the standard W-L test.

METHODS

We have developed a method to use any gantry, table, and initial collimator angles to create OAWL fields. This method calculates a series of nested coordinate transformations that produce a small collimator angle adjustment to align the MLC and create a symmetric field around an off-axis target.

RESULTS

For an 8 cm off-axis target, the described method yields OAWL results within 0.07 mm of standard isocentric W-L results. Our six most recent isocentric W-L tests show max and mean errors of 0.59 and 0.37 mm, respectively. For six runs of our proposed OAWL test, the average max and mean errors are 0.66 and 0.40 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This method accurately evaluates SRS delivery accuracy for off-axis distances that span the majority of a typical human brain for a centered SIMT arc. We have made this method publicly available, so that physicists can employ it within their clinics, foregoing the need for expensive phantoms and improving access to the state-of-the-art SIMT SRS technique.

The Use of Palliative Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Lung Cancer

There have been significant advances in the systemic treatment of stage IV lung cancer, which is now recommended first line in patients with adequate fitness. This includes some patients with brain metastases due to the increased understanding of the central nervous system penetration of targeted therapies. The trials evidence base for palliative radiotherapy pre-dated this routine use of systemic therapy in our practice, which means that the sequence and role of palliative radiotherapy are not currently well defined in the first-line treatment setting. However, due to its efficacy in symptom control, radiotherapy remains a core component in the palliative management of lung cancer, particularly in the second-line setting and those unsuited to primary systemic treatment. This overview focuses on the evidence behind palliative radiotherapy to the thorax and brain for non-small cell and small cell lung cancer and the potential for future studies, including the TOURIST Trial Platform, to guide the future direction of these treatments.

Prognostic Model for Intracranial Progression after Stereotactic Radiosurgery: A Multicenter Validation Study

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a standard of care for many patients with brain metastases. To optimize post-SRS surveillance, this study aimed to validate a previously published nomogram predicting post-SRS intracranial progression (IP). We identified consecutive patients completing an initial course of SRS across two institutions between July 2017 and December 2020. Patients were classified as low- or high-risk for post-SRS IP per a previously published nomogram. Overall survival (OS) and freedom from IP (FFIP) were assessed via the Kaplan−Meier method. Assessment of parameters impacting FFIP was performed with univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. Among 890 patients, median follow-up was 9.8 months (95% CI 9.1−11.2 months). In total, 47% had NSCLC primary tumors, and 47% had oligometastatic disease (defined as ≤5 metastastic foci) at the time of SRS. Per the IP nomogram, 53% of patients were deemed high-risk. For low- and high-risk patients, median FFIP was 13.9 months (95% CI 11.1−17.1 months) and 7.6 months (95% CI 6.4−9.3 months), respectively, and FFIP was superior in low-risk patients (p < 0.0001). This large multisite BM cohort supports the use of an IP nomogram as a quick and simple means of stratifying patients into low- and high-risk groups for post-SRS IP.

Advances in the Management of Central Nervous System Metastases from Breast Cancer

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases are common in breast cancer (BC) patients and are particularly relevant as new treatments for BC are prolonging survival. Here, we review advances in the treatment of CNS metastases from BC, including radiotherapy, systemic therapies, and the evolving role of immunotherapy. The use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy is the cornerstone of treatment for CNS metastases. However, new targeted therapies have recently been developed, including anti-HER2 agents and antibody-drug conjugates that have presented promising results for the treatment of these patients.

Anti-Hormonal Therapy in Breast Cancer and Its Effect on the Blood-Brain Barrier

The molecular receptor status of breast cancer has implications for prognosis and long-term metastasis. Although metastatic luminal B-like, hormone-receptor-positive, HER2−negative, breast cancer causes brain metastases less frequently than other subtypes, though tumor metastases in the brain are increasingly being detected of this patient group. Despite the many years of tried and tested use of a wide variety of anti-hormonal therapeutic agents, there is insufficient data on their intracerebral effectiveness and their ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. In this review, we therefore summarize the current state of knowledge on anti-hormonal therapy and its intracerebral impact and effects on the blood-brain barrier in breast cancer.

Brain metastases: A Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) consensus review on current management and future directions

Brain metastases occur commonly in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Yet, less is known about brain metastases than cancer-related entities of similar incidence. Advances in oncologic care have heightened the importance of intracranial management. Here, in this consensus review supported by the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO), we review the landscape of brain metastases with particular attention to management approaches and ongoing efforts with potential to shape future paradigms of care. Each coauthor carried an area of expertise within the field of brain metastases and initially composed, edited, or reviewed their specific subsection of interest. After each subsection was accordingly written, multiple drafts of the manuscript were circulated to the entire list of authors for group discussion and feedback. The hope is that the these consensus guidelines will accelerate progress in the understanding and management of patients with brain metastases, and highlight key areas in need of further exploration that will lead to dedicated trials and other research investigations designed to advance the field.

Single isocenter stereotactic irradiation for multiple brain metastases: current situation and prospects

The prognosis of patients with brain metastases has dramatically improved, and long-term tumor control and reduction of the risk of late toxicities, including neurocognitive dysfunction, are important for patient quality of life. Stereotactic irradiation for multiple brain metastases, rather than whole-brain radiotherapy, can result in high local control rate with low incidence of neurocognitive deterioration and leukoencephalopathy. Recent advances in radiotherapy devices, treatment-planning systems, and image-guided radiotherapy can realize single isocenter stereotactic irradiation for multiple brain metastases (SI-STI-MBM), in which only one isocenter is sufficient to treat multiple brain metastases simultaneously. SI-STI-MBM has expanded the indications for linear accelerator-based stereotactic irradiation and considerably reduced patient burden. This review summarizes the background, methods, clinical outcomes, and specific consideration points of SI-STI-MBM. In addition, the prospects of SI-STI-MBM are addressed.

Update on the Management of Brain Metastasis

Brain metastases occur in almost one-third of adult patients with solid tumor malignancies and lead to considerable patient morbidity and mortality. The rising incidence of brain metastases has been ascribed to the development of better imaging and screening techniques and the formulation of better systemic therapies. Until recently, the multimodal management of brain metastases focused primarily on the utilization of neurosurgical techniques, with varying combinations of whole-brain radiation therapy and stereotactic radio-surgical procedures. Over the past 2 decades, in particular, the increment in knowledge pertaining to molecular genetics and the pathogenesis of brain metastases has led to significant developments in targeted therapies and immunotherapies. This review article highlights the recent updates in the management of brain metastases with an emphasis on novel systemic therapies.

Radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases using volumetric modulated arc therapy: a single institutional series

Background

Patients with brain metastases (BM) live longer due to improved diagnosis and oncologic treatments. The association of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) with brain radiosurgery (SRS) allows complex dose distributions and faster treatment delivery to multiple lesions.

Materials and methods

This study is a retrospective analysis of SRS for brain metastasis using VMAT. The primary endpoints were local disease-free survival (LDFS) and overall survival (OS). The secondary outcomes were intracranial disease-free survival (IDFS) and meningeal disease-free survival (MDFS).

Results

The average number of treated lesions was 5.79 (range: 2-20) per treatment in a total of 113 patients. The mean prescribed dose was 18 Gy (range: 12-24 Gy). The median LDFS was 46 months. The LDFS in 6, 12, and 24 months was for 86%, 79%, and 63%, respectively. Moreover, brain progression occurred in 50 patients. The median overall survival was 47 months. The OS in 75%, 69%, and 61% patients was 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. IDFS was 6 and 24 months in 35% and 14% patients, respectively. The mean MDFS was 62 months; it was 6 and 24 months for 87% and 83% of patients. Acute severe toxicity was relatively rare. During follow-up, the rates of radionecrosis and neurocognitive impairment were low (10%).

Conclusion

The use of VMAT-SRS for multiple BM was feasible, effective, and associated with low treatment-related toxicity rates. Thus, treatment with VMAT is a safe technique to plan to achieve local control without toxicity.

Added value of delayed post-contrast FLAIR in diagnosis of metastatic brain lesions

Background

One of the drawbacks in contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (CE-T1WI) is the enhancing cortical vessels which can be confused with meningeal enhancement. Previous studies reported that post-contrast FLAIR could be better for diagnosing the superficial brain abnormalities. So the purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of delayed post-contrast FLAIR, in comparison with post-contrast T1, in the detection and evaluation of brain metastases.

Results

The study was conducted on 40 patients with suspected/known brain metastases scanned in order to detect and evaluate brain metastases. All patients were subjected to the following: full history taking, review of clinical examination reports, and other imaging modalities whenever available, followed by brain MRI examination using 1.5 T closed magnet including pre-contrast series, axial and sagittal T1-weighted spin echo (SE), axial and coronal T2-weighted turbo spin echo (TSE) and axial FLAIR, while post-contrast series included axial, coronal and sagittal T1-weighted spin echo (SE) and lastly DPC-FLAIR sequence 10 min after contrast administration. This study included 18 males and 22 females, ranging in age from 26 to 75 years. Six out of a total of 40 patients had brain metastases of unknown origin, while 34 of them were presented with different types of known primary tumors. The detected lesions were subdivided into five groups according to their detectability by DPC-FLAIR and contrast-enhanced T1WI: Group (I): lesions detected only by DPC-FLAIR: 16 lesions; Group (II): lesions detected only by CE-T1WI: 1 lesion; Group (III): lesions detected by both DPC-FLAIR and CE-T1WI with equal conspicuity by both: 28 lesions; Group (IV): lesions detected by both, showing more obvious enhancement with DPC-FLAIR: 43 lesions; and Group (V): lesions detected by both, showing more obvious enhancement with CE-T1WI: 11 lesions. DPC-FLAIR had a sensitivity of 98.98% and a specificity of 100% for the detection of metastatic brain lesions and for CE-T1WI; sensitivity of 83.83%; and a specificity of 50%.

Conclusions

Delayed post-contrast FLAIR is a reliable sequence for the detection of metastatic brain lesions as it can detect more metastatic brain lesions compared to contrast-enhanced T1WI.

LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy for brain metastases in patients with breast cancer

Background:

Brain metastases (BM) are common in patients with HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer. In this study we aim to report clinical outcomes with LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) for BM in patients of breast cancer.

Methods:

Clinical and dosimetric records of breast cancer patients treated for BM at our institute between May, 2015 and December, 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients of previously treated or newly diagnosed breast cancer with at least a radiological diagnosis of BM; 1–4 in number, ≤3·5 cm in maximum dimension, with a Karnofsky Performance Score of ≥60 were taken up for treatment with SRS. SRT was generally considered if a tumour was >3·5 cm in diameter, near a critical or eloquent structure, or if the proximity of moderately sized tumours would lead to dose bridging in a single-fraction SRS plan. The median prescribed SRS dose was 15 Gy (range 7–24 Gy) and SRT dose was 27 Gy in 3 fractions.

Clinical assessment and MR imaging was done at 6 weeks post-SRS and then every 3 months thereafter. Intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan–Meier method and subgroups were compared using log rank test.

Results:

Total, 40 tumours were treated in 31 patients. The median tumour diameter was 2·3 cm (range 1·0–4·6 cm). SRS and SRT were delivered in 27 and 4 patients, respectively. SRS/SRT was given as a boost to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in four patients and as salvage for progression after WBRT in six patients. In general, nine patients underwent prior surgery. The median follow-up was 7·9 months (0·2–34 months). Twenty (64·5%) patients developed local recurrence, 10 (32·3%) patients developed distant intracranial relapse and 7 patients had both local and distant intracranial relapse. The estimated local control at 6 months and 1 year was 48 and 35%, respectively. Median intracranial progression free survival (PFS) was 3·73 months (range 0·2–25 months). Median intracranial PFS was 3·02 months in patients who received SRS alone or as boost after WBRT, while it was 4·27 months in those who received SRS as salvage after WBRT (p = 0·793). No difference in intracranial PFS was observed with or without prior surgery (p = 0·410). Median overall survival (OS) was 21·7 months (range 0·2–34 months) for the entire cohort. Patients who received prior WBRT had a poor OS (13·31 months) as compared to SRS alone (21·4 months; p = 0·699).

Conclusion:

In patients with BM after breast cancer SRS alone, WBRT + SRS and surgery + SRS had comparable PFS and OS.

Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) for Patients With Lung Cancer and Brain Metastases: Initial Report of the Small Cell Lung Cancer GPA and Update of the Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer GPA Including the Effect of Programmed Death Ligand 1 and Other Prognostic Factors

PURPOSE

Patients with lung cancer and brain metastases represent a markedly heterogeneous population. Accurate prognosis is essential to optimally individualize care. In prior publications, we described the graded prognostic assessment (GPA), but a GPA for patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has never been reported, and in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the effect of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) was unknown. The 3-fold purpose of this work is to provide the initial report of an SCLC GPA, to evaluate the effect of PD-L1 on survival in patients with NSCLC, and to update the Lung GPA accordingly.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A multivariable analysis of prognostic factors and treatments associated with survival was performed on 4183 patients with lung cancer (3002 adenocarcinoma, 611 nonadenocarcinoma, 570 SCLC) with newly diagnosed brain metastases between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020, using a multi-institutional retrospective database. Significant variables were used to update the Lung GPA.

RESULTS

Overall median survival for lung adenocarcinoma, SCLC, and nonadenocarcinoma was 17, 10, and 8 months, respectively, but varied widely by GPA from 2 to 52 months. In SCLC, the significant prognostic factors were age, performance status, extracranial metastases, and number of brain metastases. In NSCLC, the distribution of molecular markers among patients with lung adenocarcinoma and known primary tumor molecular status revealed alterations/expression in PD-L1 50% to 100%, PD-L1 1% to 49%, epidermal growth factor receptor, and anaplastic lymphoma kinase in 32%, 31%, 30%, and 7%, respectively. Median survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma and brain metastases with 0, 1% to 49%, and ≥50% PD-L1 expression was 17, 19, and 24 months, respectively (P < .01), confirming PD-L1 is a prognostic factor. Previously identified prognostic factors for NSCLC (epidermal growth factor receptor and anaplastic lymphoma kinase status, performance status, age, number of brain metastases, and extracranial metastases) were reaffirmed. These factors were incorporated into the updated Lung GPA with robust separation between subgroups for all histologies.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival for patients with lung cancer and brain metastases has improved but varies widely. The initial report of a GPA for SCLC is presented. For patients with NSCLC-adenocarcinoma and brain metastases, PD-L1 is a newly identified significant prognostic factor, and the previously identified factors were reaffirmed. The updated indices establish unique criteria for SCLC, NSCLC-nonadenocarcinoma, and NSCLC-adenocarcinoma (incorporating PD-L1). The updated Lung GPA, available for free at brainmetgpa.com, provides an accurate tool to estimate survival, individualize treatment, and stratify clinical trials.

Radiation therapy for melanoma brain metastases: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Radiation therapy (RT) for melanoma brain metastases, delivered either as whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) or as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), is an established component of treatment for this condition. However, evidence allowing comparison of the outcomes, advantages and disadvantages of the two RT modalities is scant, with very few randomised controlled trials having been conducted. This has led to considerable uncertainty and inconsistent guideline recommendations. The present systematic review identified 112 studies reporting outcomes for patients with melanoma brain metastases treated with RT. Three were randomised controlled trials but only one was of sufficient size to be considered informative. Most of the evidence was from non-randomised studies, either specific treatment series or disease cohorts. Criteria for determining treatment choice were reported in only 32 studies and the quality of these studies was variable. From the time of diagnosis of brain metastasis, the median survival after WBRT alone was 3.5 months (IQR 2.4-4.0 months) and for SRS alone it was 7.5 months (IQR 6.7-9.0 months). Overall patient survival increased over time (pre-1989 to 2015) but this was not apparent within specific treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These survival estimates provide a baseline for determining the incremental benefits of recently introduced systemic treatments using targeted therapy or immunotherapy for melanoma brain metastases.

The Management and Outcomes of Patients with Extra-Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms and Brain Metastases

Background: Brain metastases (BMs) in patients with extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms (EP–NENs) are rare, and limited clinical information is available. The aim of this study was to detail the clinicopathological features, management and outcomes in patients with EP–NENs who developed BMs. Methods: A retrospective single-centre analysis of consecutive patients with EP–NENs (August 2004–February 2020) was conducted. Median overall survival (OS)/survival from BMs diagnosis was estimated (Kaplan–Meier). Results: Of 730 patients, 17 (1.9%) had BMs, median age 61 years (range 15–77); 8 (53%) male, unknown primary NEN site: 40%. Patients with BMs had grade 3 (G3) EP–NENs 11 (73%), G2: 3 (20%), G1: 1 (7%). Eight (53%) had poorly differentiated NENs, 6 were well-differentiated and 1 was not recorded. Additionally, 2 (13%) patients had synchronous BMs at diagnosis, whilst 13 (87%) developed BMs metachronously. The relative risk of developing BMs was 7.48 in patients with G3 disease vs. G1 + G2 disease (p = 0.0001). Median time to the development of BMs after NEN diagnosis: 15.9 months (range 2.5–139.5). Five patients had a solitary BM, 12 had multiple BMs. Treatment of BMs were surgery (n = 3); radiotherapy (n = 5); 4: whole brain radiotherapy, 1: conformal radiotherapy (orbit). Nine (53%) had best supportive care. Median OS from NEN diagnosis was 23.6 months [95% CI 15.2–31.3]; median time to death from BMs diagnosis was 3.0 months [95% CI 0.0–8.3]. Conclusion: BMs in patients with EP–NENs are rare and of increased risk in G3 vs. G1 + G2 EP–NENs. Survival outcomes are poor, and a greater understanding is needed to improve therapeutic outcomes.

Tumor Control Probability following Radiosurgery of Brain Metastases with and without Retreatment

PURPOSE

To develop and compare tumor-control-probability (TCP) models for single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastasis (BMs) with and without retreatment.

METHODS

We developed three different schemas to model TCP of BMs treated with LINAC-based SRS. Dose to 99% of each planning-target-volume (PTV D₉₉) and six-month local-control was fit using linear-quadratic-linear (LQ-L) models based on equivalent-dose conversions in 2Gy (EQD2). The M1 schema had separate LQ-L TCP models for initial dose (M1-initial) and retreatment dose (M1-retreat), and the M2 schema had an LQ-L model using the sum of 50% of the initial SRS dose plus the retreatment SRS dose. The M1-initial and M1-retreat schema modeled local control following 1^st SRS to 48 lesions (patients=22) and 2^nd SRS to 46 lesions (patients=21). The M0 schema included a whole dataset of 349 lesions (patients=136) receiving first SRS (no retreatment and M1-initial).

RESULTS

LQ-L models fitted the data well (Chi-2=0.059-0.525 and p=0.999-1.000). For M0 and M1-retreat, the fitted models EQD2₅₀ and γ₅₀ parameters, were similar. The LQ-L fitted EQD2₅₀ was ∼8.0Gy for M0 and M1-retreat, ∼24Gy for M1-initial, and ∼19Gy for M2. The model fitted γ₅₀ was 0.1Gy for M0, M1-retreat, and M2 and 0.5 for M1-initial. For the PTV D₉₉ of 10Gy and 20Gy, the steepest to shallowest dose-response or largest change in TCP, i.e., TCP_20Gy - TCP_10Gy was observed in M1-initial (0.49) and M2 (0.17). M0 and M1-retreat showed a similar change in TCP of 0.21.

CONCLUSION

The model fitted parameters predict the recurrent BMs required a higher threshold dose and had a steeper dose-response for 1^st SRS vs. 2^nd SRS and M0. Alternatively, the recurrent BMs required ∼2Gy higher predicted PTV D₉₉ dose for 1^st SRS to achieve the same TCP of 0.75 when compared to 2^nd SRS and M0. Further investigations on larger patient cohorts are needed for validating our findings in predictive modeling of recurrent brain metastases.