Inhibitory effect of oxytocin on corticotrope function in humans: are vasopressin and oxytocin ying-yang neurohormones?

Seeing the unexpected: how sex differences in stress responses may provide a new perspective on the manifestation of psychiatric disorders

In this report, the authors propose that underlying sex differences in the biobehavioral response to stress may contribute to the variance in prevalence of some psychiatric disorders based on sex. The authors begin with a discussion of stress physiology and review a new theory on sex differences in stress responses (ie, the "tend-and-befriend" response), which may provide a recent framework for considering sex differences in the manifestation of some psychiatric illnesses. The authors then move to a discussion of major depression and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder as examples of how sex differences in stress responses may influence the behavioral symptoms of psychiatric disorders that are more often diagnosed in one sex compared with another. The authors conclude with a brief discussion of the implications of this new perspective on treatment approaches and encourage further inquiry into the importance of sex-based differences in the behavioral manifestation of some psychiatric illnesses.

Involvement of medullary A2 noradrenergic neurons in the activation of oxytocin neurons after conditioned fear stimuli

Fear-related stimuli activate oxytocin neurons in the hypothalamus and facilitate oxytocin release from the pituitary. Oxytocin neurons in the supraoptic nucleus receive direct noradrenergic innervations from the A1 and A2 cell groups in the medulla oblongata. In the present study, we investigated the role of hypothalamic-projecting noradrenergic neurons in controlling oxytocin cell activity following fear-related stimuli in rats. An unconditioned fear stimulus (intermittently applied footshock) or conditioned fear stimulus induced expression of Fos protein, a protein product of an immediate-early gene, in magnocellular oxytocin neurons in the supraoptic or paraventricular nucleus. A neurotoxin, 5-amino-2,4-dihydroxy-alpha-methylphenylethylamine, microinjected into the vicinity of the supraoptic nucleus, selectively depleted the noradrenaline contents of the nucleus and blocked the Fos expression in the supraoptic nucleus after the unconditioned or conditioned fear stimulus. In the medulla oblongata, the unconditioned fear stimulus induced expression of Fos protein in both A2/C2 and A1/C1 catecholaminergic neurons. On the other hand, the conditioned fear stimulus induced expression of Fos protein preferentially in the A2/C2 neurons. Furthermore, the unconditioned fear stimulus induced Fos expression in the A1/C1 and A2/C2 catecholaminergic neurons labelled with retrograde tracers previously injected into the supraoptic nucleus. The conditioned fear stimulus induced Fos expression preferentially in the A2/C2 catecholaminergic neurons labelled with the retrograde tracers. These data suggest that the conditioned fear-induced oxytocin cell activity is mediated by the A2 noradrenergic neurons projecting to oxytocin neurons, while the unconditioned fear response is mediated by both A2 and A1 noradrenergic neurons.

Vasopressin from hypothalamic magnocellular neurons has opposite actions at the adenohypophysis and in the supraoptic nucleus on ACTH secretion

Magnocellular vasopressinergic and oxytocinergic neurons of the hypothalamic supraoptic (SON) and paraventricular nuclei comprise the hypothalamic-neurohypophysial system, which is crucially involved in the regulation of body fluid and electrolyte homeostasis. However, still controversial is to what extent the same system influences the secretion of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) from the adenohypophysis. Therefore, we selectively stimulated magnocellular neurons of the SON of conscious male Wistar rats via retrodialysis. As expected, dialysis of the SON with hypertonic medium increased both the release of vasopressin within the SON and the secretion of vasopressin and oxytocin into the systemic blood circulation. This activation of the hypothalamic-neurohypophysial system was accompanied by a fivefold increase in plasma ACTH concentration. This effect was observed only if the tip of the microdialysis probe was within the SON. Intravenous infusion of the vasopressin V1 receptor antagonist d(CH2)5Tyr(Me)AVP significantly attenuated the effects of local osmotic stimulation of the SON on ACTH secretion. In contrast, administration of the same antagonist directly into the SON significantly enhanced the osmotically stimulated secretion of ACTH and corticosterone, primarily by delaying the restoration of the hormone secretion to prestimulation levels. We conclude from these findings that vasopressin from the hypothalamic-neurohypophysial system participates in the regulation of the hormonal stress response in a counterbalanced manner at the level of the SON and the adenohypophysis.

The molecular neurobiology of stress--evidence from genetic and epigenetic models

Knowledge of the genetic and molecular events underlying the neuroendocrine and behavioural sequelae of the response to stress has advanced rapidly over recent years. The response of an individual to a stressful experience is a polygenic trait, but also involves non-genetic sources of variance. Using a combination of top-down (quantitative trait locus [QTL] and microarray analysis) and bottom-up (gene targeting, transgenesis, antisense technology and random mutagenesis) strategies, we are beginning to dissect the molecular players in the mediation of the stress response. Given the wealth of the data obtained from mouse mutants, this review will primarily focus on the contributions made by transgenesis and knockout studies, but the relative contribution of QTL studies and microarray studies will also be briefly addressed. From these studies it is evident that several neuroendocrine and behavioural alterations induced by stress can be modelled in mouse mutants with alterations in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity or other, extrahypothalamic, neurotransmitter systems known to be involved in the stress response. The relative contribution of these models to understanding the stress response and their limitations will be discussed.