Homophilic adhesion by cadherins

INP, a novel N-cadherin antagonist targeted to the amino acids that flank the HAV motif

The classical cadherins are homophilic binding molecules that play fundamental roles in several biological processes, including axonal growth and synaptic plasticity. The structures of the amino-terminal homophilic binding domains of N-cadherin and E-cadherin have been resolved. However, the mechanisms that govern cadherin binding and specificity remain contentious. In the present study we have used a peptide competition approach to probe for small linear determinants of cadherin binding. We demonstrate that a linear peptide mimetic of a short sequence in ECD1 of N-cadherin (INPISGQ) functions as a highly specific and potent antagonist of N-cadherin function with an IC(50) value of approximately 15 microM. Peptide mimetics of the corresponding motif in chick R-cadherin also inhibited N-cadherin function, albeit with lower efficacy. In contrast, peptide mimetics of the corresponding motif in E- or P-cadherin failed to inhibit N-cadherin function. A short cyclic peptide that contained only the INP motif from N-cadherin was also a potent N-cadherin antagonist (IC(50) approximately 15 microM). Analysis of existing crystal structures suggests that the peptides are likely to antagonize N-cadherin function by binding to the region that flanks the HAV motif at the adhesion dimer interface.

Cadherin interaction probed by atomic force microscopy

Single molecule atomic force microscopy was used to characterize structure, binding strength (unbinding force), and binding kinetics of a classical cadherin, vascular endothelial (VE)-cadherin, secreted by transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells as cis-dimerized full-length external domain fused to Fc-portion of human IgG. In physiological buffer, the external domain of VE-cadherin dimers is a approximately 20-nm-long rod-shaped molecule that collapses and dissociates into monomers (V-shaped structures) in the absence of Ca(2+). Trans-interaction of dimers is a low-affinity reaction (K(D) = 10(-3)-10(-5) M, k(off) = 1.8 s(-1), k(on) = 10(3)-10(5) M(-1) x s(-1)) with relatively low unbinding force (35-55 pN at retrace velocities of 200-4,000 nm x s(-1)). Higher order unbinding forces, that increase with interaction time, indicate association of cadherins into complexes with cumulative binding strength. These observations favor a model by which the inherently weak unit binding strength and affinity of cadherin trans-interaction requires clustering and cytoskeletal immobilization for amplification. Binding is regulated by low-affinity Ca(2+) binding sites (K(D) = 1.15 mM) with high cooperativity (Hill coefficient of 5.04). Local changes of free extracellular Ca(2+) in the narrow intercellular space may be of physiological importance to facilitate rapid remodeling of intercellular adhesion and communication.

A novel family of cyclic peptide antagonists suggests that N-cadherin specificity is determined by amino acids that flank the HAV motif

The classical cadherins (e.g. N-, E-, and P- cadherin) are well established homophilic adhesion molecules; however, the mechanism that governs cadherin specificity remains contentious. The classical cadherins contain an evolutionarily conserved His-Ala-Val (HAV) sequence, and linear peptides harboring this motif are capable of inhibiting a variety of cadherin-dependent processes. We now demonstrate that short cyclic HAV peptides can inhibit N-cadherin function. Interestingly, the nature of the amino acids that flank the HAV motif determine both the activity and specificity of the peptides. For example, when the HAV motif is flanked by a single aspartic acid, which mimics the natural HAVD sequence of N-cadherin, the peptide becomes a much more effective inhibitor of N-cadherin function. In contrast, when the HAV motif is flanked by a single serine, which mimics the natural HAVS sequence of E-cadherin, it loses its ability to inhibit the N-cadherin response. Our results demonstrate that subtle changes in the amino acids that flank the HAV motif can account for cadherin specificity and that small cyclic peptides can inhibit cadherin function. An emerging role for cadherins in a number of pathological processes suggests that the cyclic peptides reported in this study might be developed as therapeutic agents.

Molecular mechanisms that control endothelial cell contacts

Endothelial cell contacts control the permeability of the blood vessel wall. This allows the endothelium to form a barrier for solutes, macromolecules, and leukocytes between the vessel lumen and the interstitial space. Loss of this barrier function in pathophysiological situations can lead to extracellular oedema. The ability of leukocytes to enter tissue at sites of inflammation is dependent on molecular mechanisms that allow leukocytes to adhere to the endothelium and to migrate through the endothelial cell layer and the underlying basal lamina. It is a commonly accepted working hypothesis that inter-endothelial cell contacts are actively opened and closed during this process. Angiogenesis is another important process that requires well-controlled regulation of inter-endothelial cell contacts. The formation of new blood vessels by sprouting from pre-existing vessels depends on the loosening of established endothelial cell contacts and the migration of endothelial cells that form the outgrowing sprouts. This review focuses on the molecular composition of endothelial cell surface proteins and proteins of the cytoskeletal undercoat of the plasma membrane at sites of inter-endothelial cell contacts and discusses the current knowledge about the potential role of such molecules in the regulation of endothelial cell contacts.

Mechanism of cell-cell adhesion complex assembly

Cell-cell adhesion complexes play an important role in the organization and behavior of cells in tissues. An important step in the formation of such complexes is the clustering of the adhesion receptors; this is critical for proper adhesion, for anchorage of the cytoskeleton to the plasma membrane, and for generation of different intracellular signals. Recent advances reveal that several interconnected mechanisms are responsible for clustering of the different adhesion receptors.