Terminating eukaryote translation: domain 1 of release factor eRF1 functions in stop codon recognition

Discrimination between defects in elongation fidelity and termination efficiency provides mechanistic insights into translational readthrough

The suppression of stop codons (termed translational readthrough) can be caused by a decreased accuracy of translation elongation or a reduced efficiency of translation termination. In previous studies, the inability to determine the extent to which each of these distinct processes contributes to a readthrough phenotype has limited our ability to evaluate how defects in the translational machinery influence the overall termination process. Here, we describe the combined use of misincorporation and readthrough reporter systems to determine which of these mechanisms contributes to translational readthrough in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The misincorporation reporter system was generated by introducing a series of near-cognate mutations into functionally important residues in the firefly luciferase gene. These constructs allowed us to monitor the incidence of elongation errors by monitoring the level of firefly luciferase activity from a mutant allele inactivated by a single missense mutation. In this system, an increase in luciferase activity should reflect an increased level of misincorporation of the wild-type amino acid that provides an estimate of the overall fidelity of translation elongation. Surprisingly, we found that growth in the presence of paromomycin stimulated luciferase activity for only a small subset of the mutant proteins examined. This suggests that the ability of this aminoglycoside to induce elongation errors is limited to a subset of near-cognate mismatches. We also found that a similar bias in near-cognate misreading could be induced by the expression of a mutant form of ribosomal protein (r-protein) S9B or by depletion of r-protein L12. We used this misincorporation reporter in conjunction with a readthrough reporter system to show that alterations at different regions of the ribosome influence elongation fidelity and termination efficiency to different extents.

Downregulation of eRF1 by RNA interference increases mis-acylated tRNA suppression efficiency in human cells

The site-specific incorporation of non-natural amino acids into proteins by nonsense suppression has been widely used to investigate protein structure and function. Usually this technique exhibits low incorporation efficiencies of non-natural amino acids into proteins. We describe for the first time an approach for achieving an increased level of nonsense codon suppression with synthetic suppressor tRNAs in cultured human cells. We find that the intracellular concentration of the eukaryotic release factor 1 (eRF1) is a critical parameter influencing the efficiency of amino acid incorporation by nonsense suppression. Using RNA interference we were able to lower eRF1 gene expression significantly. We achieved a five times higher level of amino acid incorporation as compared with non-treated control cells, as demonstrated by enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) fluorescence recovery after importing a mutated reporter mRNA together with an artificial amber suppressor tRNA.

Translation termination factors function outside of translation: yeast eRF1 interacts with myosin light chain, Mlc1p, to effect cytokinesis

The translation termination factor eRF1 recognizes stop codons at the A site of the ribosome and induces peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis at the peptidyl transferase centre. Recent data show that, besides translation, yeast eRF1 is also involved in cell cycle regulation. To clarify the mechanisms of non-translational functions of eRF1, we performed a genetic screen for its novel partner proteins. This screen revealed the gene for myosin light chain, Mlc1p, acting as a dosage suppressor of a temperature-sensitive mutation in the SUP45 gene encoding eRF1. eRF1 and Mlc1p are able to interact with each other and, similarly to depletion of Mlc1p, mutations in the SUP45 gene may affect cytokinesis. Immunofluorescent staining performed to determine localization of Mlc1p has shown that the sup45 mutation, which arrests cytokinesis, redistributed Mlc1p, causing its disappearance from the bud tip and the bud neck. The data obtained demonstrate that yeast eRF1 has an important non-translational function effecting cytokinesis via interaction with Mlc1p.

Newly sequenced eRF1s from ciliates: the diversity of stop codon usage and the molecular surfaces that are important for stop codon interactions

The genetic code of nuclear genes in some ciliates was found to differ from that of other organisms in the assignment of UGA, UAG, and UAA codons, which are normally assigned as stop codons. In some ciliate species, the universal stop codons UAA and UAG instead encode glutamine. In some other ciliates, the universal stop codon UGA appears to be translated as cysteine or tryptophan. Eukaryotic release factor 1 (eRF1) is a key protein in stop codon recognition, thus, the protein is believed to play an important role in the stop codon reassignment in ciliates. We have cloned, sequenced, and analyzed the cDNA of eRF1 from four ciliate species of three different classes: Karyorelictea (Loxodes striatus), Heterotrichea (Blepharisma musculus), and Litostomatea (Didinium nasutum, Dileptus margaritifer). Phylogenetic analysis of these eRF1s supports the hypothesis that the genetic code in ciliates has deviated independently several times from the universal genetic code, and that different ciliate eRF1s may have undergone different processes to change the codon specificity. Using computational methods, we have also suggested areas on the surface of eRF1s that are important for stop codon recognition in ciliate eRF1s.

Translation termination in Arabidopsis thaliana: characterisation of three versions of release factor 1

Translation termination is mediated in all eukaryotes by the two release factors eRF1 and eRF3. Most organisms have a single eRF1 gene, however, three isogenes of eRF1 are found in Arabidopsis thaliana. They have no introns in the coding region which may indicate that some are pseudogenes. However, each was expressed and able to rescue a temperature sensitive eRF1-mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae indicating functional redundancy in A. thaliana. While normally a highly accurate process, translation termination can be directed to fail by sequence elements within an messenger RNA (mRNA). Interestingly, a well-characterised readthrough element follows the stop codon in one of these three isogenes (designated eRF1-1). This element was shown to be capable of inducing readthrough in an in vitro assay using a dual luciferase reporter, but surprisingly readthrough could not be detected using the complete gene context. The results highlight the diversity and duplication of genes within plant genomes, but also emphasize the conservation of the translation process across kingdoms.

GTP hydrolysis by eRF3 facilitates stop codon decoding during eukaryotic translation termination

Translation termination in eukaryotes is mediated by two release factors, eRF1 and eRF3. eRF1 recognizes each of the three stop codons (UAG, UAA, and UGA) and facilitates release of the nascent polypeptide chain. eRF3 is a GTPase that stimulates the translation termination process by a poorly characterized mechanism. In this study, we examined the functional importance of GTP hydrolysis by eRF3 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We found that mutations that reduced the rate of GTP hydrolysis also reduced the efficiency of translation termination at some termination signals but not others. As much as a 17-fold decrease in the termination efficiency was observed at some tetranucleotide termination signals (characterized by the stop codon and the first following nucleotide), while no effect was observed at other termination signals. To determine whether this stop signal-dependent decrease in the efficiency of translation termination was due to a defect in either eRF1 or eRF3 recycling, we reduced the level of eRF1 or eRF3 in cells by expressing them individually from the CUP1 promoter. We found that the limitation of either factor resulted in a general decrease in the efficiency of translation termination rather than a decrease at a subset of termination signals as observed with the eRF3 GTPase mutants. We also found that overproduction of eRF1 was unable to increase the efficiency of translation termination at any termination signals. Together, these results suggest that the GTPase activity of eRF3 is required to couple the recognition of translation termination signals by eRF1 to efficient polypeptide chain release.

The Molecular Mechanics of Eukaryotic Translation

Great advances have been made in the past three decades in understanding the molecular mechanics underlying protein synthesis in bacteria, but our understanding of the corresponding events in eukaryotic organisms is only beginning to catch up. In this review we describe the current state of our knowledge and ignorance of the molecular mechanics underlying eukaryotic translation. We discuss the mechanisms conserved across the three kingdoms of life as well as the important divergences that have taken place in the pathway.

Antizyme frameshifting as a functional probe of eukaryotic translational termination

Translation termination in eukaryotes is mediated by the release factors eRF1 and eRF3, but mechanisms of the interplay between these factors are not fully understood, due partly to the difficulty of measuring termination on eukaryotic mRNAs. Here, we describe an in vitro system for the assay of termination using competition with programmed frameshifting at the recoding signal of mammalian antizyme. The efficiency of antizyme frameshifting in rabbit reticulocyte lysates was reduced by addition of recombinant rabbit eRF1 and eRF3 in a synergistic manner. Addition of suppressor tRNA to this assay system revealed competition with a third event, stop codon readthrough. Using these assays, we demonstrated that an eRF3 mutation at the GTPase domain repressed termination in a dominant negative fashion probably by binding to eRF1. The effect of the release factors and the suppressor tRNA showed that the stop codon at the antizyme frameshift site is relatively inefficient compared to either the natural termination signals at the end of protein coding sequences or the readthrough signal from a plant virus. The system affords a convenient assay for release factor activity and has provided some novel views of the mechanism of antizyme frameshifting.

Promoter analysis of the human translation termination factor 1 gene

The human translation termination factor 1 (ETF1) gene encodes a class-1 release factor, eRF1, which catalyses termination of protein synthesis at all three stop codons. In this report, we describe the functional organization of the 5'-region of the gene. Primer extension and ribonuclease protection mapping revealed three transcription start sites clustered within approximately 10 bp. DNase I-hypersensitive site analysis identified five hypersensitive sites, one of which was located downstream of the initiation start sites. We used transient expression assays to define the 5'-regulating regions and in vivo and in vitro footprinting analysis to identify potential cis-acting regulatory elements. A basal promoter, spanning nucleotides -210/+117, contained no TATA box but a putative initiator element (Inr) and multiple potential Sp1/Sp3 binding sites, and thus displayed some of the features of a housekeeping gene. An additional upstream promoter containing positive and negative regulatory elements also regulated ETF1 gene expression. Real-time quantitative RT-PCR analysis showed tissue-specific expression of ETF1 transcripts in mouse tissues. Our results are suggestive of a constitutive expression of the human ETF1 gene but with possible cell- and tissue-specific regulation.

Reverse Transcriptase of Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus Binds to Eukaryotic Release Factor 1 to Modulate Suppression of Translational Termination

The pol (for polymerase) gene of the murine leukemia viruses (MuLVs) is expressed in the form of a large Gag-Pol precursor protein by the suppression of translational termination, or enhanced readthrough, of a UAG stop codon at the end of gag. A search for cellular proteins that interact with the reverse transcriptase of Moloney MuLV resulted in the identification of eRF1, the eukaryotic translation release factor 1. The proteins bound strongly in vitro, and the overexpression of eRF1 resulted in the RT-dependent incorporation of the protein into assembling virion particles. The overexpression of RT in trans enhanced the translational readthrough of a reporter construct containing the Gag-Pol boundary region. Noninteracting mutants of RT failed to synthesize adequate levels of Gag-Pol and could not replicate. These results suggest that RT enhances suppression of termination and that the interaction of RT with eRF1 is required for an appropriate level of translational readthrough.

Stop codons and UGG promote efficient binding of the polypeptide release factor eRF1 to the ribosomal A site

To investigate the codon dependence of human eRF1 binding to the mRNA-ribosome complex, we examined the formation of photocrosslinks between ribosomal components and mRNAs bearing a photoactivable 4-thiouridine probe in the first position of the codon located in the A site. Addition of eRF1 to the phased mRNA-ribosome complexes triggers a codon-dependent quenching of crosslink formation. The concentration of eRF1 triggering half quenching ranges from low for the three stop codons, to intermediate for s4UGG and high for other near-cognate triplets. A theoretical analysis of the photochemical processes occurring in a two-state bimolecular model raises a number of stringent conditions, fulfilled by the system studied here, and shows that in any case sound KD values can be extracted if the ratio mT/KD<<1 (mT is total concentration of mRNA added). Considering the KD values obtained for the stop, s4UGG and sense codons (approximately 0.06 microM, 0.45 microM and 2.3 microM, respectively) and our previous finding that only the stop and s4UGG codons are able to promote formation of an eRF1-mRNA crosslink, implying a role for the NIKS loop at the tip of the N domain, we propose a two-step model for eRF1 binding to the A site: a codon-independent bimolecular step is followed by an isomerisation step observed solely with stop and s4UGG codons. Full recognition of the stop codons by the N domain of eRF1 triggers a rearrangement of bound eRF1 from an open to a closed conformation, allowing the universally conserved GGQ loop at the tip of the M domain to come into close proximity of the peptidyl transferase center of the ribosome. UGG is expected to behave as a cryptic stop codon, which, owing to imperfect eRF1-codon recognition, does not allow full reorientation of the M domain of eRF1. As far as the physical steps of eRF1 binding to the ribosome are considered, they appear to closely mimic the behaviour of the tRNA/EF-Tu/GTP complex, but clearly eRF1 is endowed with a greater conformational flexibility than tRNA.

Stop codon selection in eukaryotic translation termination: comparison of the discriminating potential between human and ciliate eRF1s

During eukaryotic translation termination, eRF1 responds to three stop codons. However, in ciliates with variant genetic codes, only one or two codons function as a stop signal. To localize the region of ciliate eRF1 implicated in stop codon discrimination, we have constructed ciliate-human hybrid eRF1s by swapping regions of human eRF1 for the equivalent region of ciliate Euplotes eRF1. We have examined the formation of a cross-link between recombinant eRF1s and mRNA analogs containing the photoactivable 4-thiouridine (s(4)U) at the first position of stop and control sense codons. With human eRF1, this cross-link can be detected only when either stop or UGG codons are located in the ribosomal A site. Here we show that the cross-link of the Euplotes-human hybrid eRF1 is restricted to mRNAs containing UAG and UAA codons, and that the entire N-terminal domain of Euplotes eRF1 is involved in discriminating against UGA and UGG. On the basis of these results, we discuss the steps of the selection process that determine the accuracy of stop codon recognition in eukaryotes.

Viable nonsense mutants for the essential gene SUP45 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

BACKGROUND

Termination of protein synthesis in eukaryotes involves at least two polypeptide release factors (eRFs) - eRF1 and eRF3. The highly conserved translation termination factor eRF1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is encoded by the essential gene SUP45.

RESULTS

We have isolated five sup45-n (n from nonsense) mutations that cause nonsense substitutions in the following amino acid positions of eRF1: Y53 --> UAA, E266 --> UAA, L283 --> UAA, L317 --> UGA, E385 --> UAA. We found that full-length eRF1 protein is present in all mutants, although in decreased amounts. All mutations are situated in a weak termination context. All these sup45-n mutations are viable in different genetic backgrounds, however their viability increases after growth in the absence of wild-type allele. Any of sup45-n mutations result in temperature sensitivity (37 degrees C). Most of the sup45-n mutations lead to decreased spore viability and spores bearing sup45-n mutations are characterized by limited budding after germination leading to formation of microcolonies of 4-20 cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonsense mutations in the essential gene SUP45 can be isolated in the absence of tRNA nonsense suppressors.

Making sense of mimic in translation termination

The mechanism of translation termination has long been a puzzle. Recent crystallographic evidence suggests that the eukaryotic release factor (eRF1), the bacterial release factor (RF2) and the ribosome recycling factor (RRF) all mimic a tRNA structure, whereas biochemical and genetic evidence supports the idea of a tripeptide 'anticodon' in bacterial release factors RF1 and RF2. However, the suggested structural mimicry of RF2 is not in agreement with the tripeptide 'anticodon' hypothesis and, furthermore, recently determined structures using cryo-electron microscopy show that, when bound to the ribosome, RF2 has a conformation that is distinct from the RF2 crystal structure. In addition, hydroxyl-radical probings of RRF on the ribosome are not in agreement with the simple idea that RRF mimics tRNA in the ribosome A-site. All of this evidence seriously questions the simple concept of structural mimicry between proteins and RNA and, thus, leaves only functional mimicry of protein factors of translation to be investigated.

Termination of translation: interplay of mRNA, rRNAs and release factors?

Termination of translation in eukaryotes has focused recently on functional anatomy of polypeptide chain release factor, eRF1, by using a variety of different approaches. The tight correlation between the domain structure and different functions of eRF1 has been revealed. Independently, the role of prokaryotic RF1/2 in GTPase activity of RF3 has been deciphered, as well as RF3 function itself.

Structure of the Escherichia coli ribosomal termination complex with release factor 2

Termination of protein synthesis occurs when the messenger RNA presents a stop codon in the ribosomal aminoacyl (A) site. Class I release factor proteins (RF1 or RF2) are believed to recognize stop codons via tripeptide motifs, leading to release of the completed polypeptide chain from its covalent attachment to transfer RNA in the ribosomal peptidyl (P) site. Class I RFs possess a conserved GGQ amino-acid motif that is thought to be involved directly in protein-transfer-RNA bond hydrolysis. Crystal structures of bacterial and eukaryotic class I RFs have been determined, but the mechanism of stop codon recognition and peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis remains unclear. Here we present the structure of the Escherichia coli ribosome in a post-termination complex with RF2, obtained by single-particle cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM). Fitting the known 70S and RF2 structures into the electron density map reveals that RF2 adopts a different conformation on the ribosome when compared with the crystal structure of the isolated protein. The amino-terminal helical domain of RF2 contacts the factor-binding site of the ribosome, the 'SPF' loop of the protein is situated close to the mRNA, and the GGQ-containing domain of RF2 interacts with the peptidyl-transferase centre (PTC). By connecting the ribosomal decoding centre with the PTC, RF2 functionally mimics a tRNA molecule in the A site. Translational termination in eukaryotes is likely to be based on a similar mechanism.

Molecular Mimicry in the Decoding of Translational Stop Signals

Molecular mimicry was a concept that was revived as we understood more about the ligands that bound to the active center of the ribosome, and the characteristics of the active center itself. It has been particularly useful for the termination phase of protein synthesis, because for many years this major process seemed not only to be out of step) with the initiation and elongation phases but also there were no common features of the process between eubacteria and eukaryotes. As the facts that supported molecular mimicry emerged, it was seen that the protein factors that facilitated polypeptide chain release when the decoding of an mRNA was complete had common features with the ligands involved in the other phases. Moreover, now common features and mechanisms began to emerge between the eubacterial and eukaryotic RFs and suddenly there seemed to be remarkable synergy between the external ligands and commonality in at least some features of the mechanistic prnciples. Almost 10 years after molecular mimicry took hold as a framework concept, we can now see that this idea is probably too simple. For example, structural mimicry can be apparent if there are extensive conformational changes either in the ribosome active center or in the ligand itself or, most likely, both. Early indications are that the bacterial RF may indeed undergo extensive conformational changes from its solution structure to achieve this accommodation. Thus, as important if not more important than structural and functional mimicry among the ligands, might be their accomodation of a common single active center made up of at least three parts to carry out a complex series of reactions. One part of the ribosomal active center is committed to decoding, a second is committed to the chemistry of putting the protein together and releasing it, and a third part, perhaps residing in the subdomains, is committed to binding ligands so that they can perform their respective single or multiple functions. It might be more accurate to regard the decoding RF as the cuckoo taking over the nest that was crafted and honed through evolution by another, the tRNA. A somewhat ungainly RF, perhaps bigger in dimensions than the tRNA, is able, nevertheless, like the cuckoo, to maneuvre into the nest. Perhaps it pushes the nest a little out of shape, but is still able to use the site for its own functions of stop signal decoding and for facilitating the release of the polypeptide. The term molecular mimicry has been dominant in the literature for a period of important advances in the understanding of protein synthesis. When the first structures of the ribosome appeared, the concept survived and was seen to be valid still. Now, we are at the stage of understanding the more detailed molecular interactions between ligands and the rRNA in particular, and how subtle changes in localized spatial orientations of atoms occur within these interactions. The simplicity of the original concept of mimicry will inevitably be blurred by this more detailed analysis. Nevertheless, it has provided a significant set of principles that allowed development of experimental programs to enhance our understanding of the dynamic events at this remarkable active site at the interface between the two subunits of this fascinating cell organelle, the ribosome.

Inhibition of translation termination mediated by an interaction of eukaryotic release factor 1 with a nascent peptidyl-tRNA

Expression of the human cytomegalovirus UL4 gene is inhibited by translation of a 22-codon-upstream open reading frame (uORF2). The peptide product of uORF2 acts in a sequence-dependent manner to inhibit its own translation termination, resulting in persistence of the uORF2 peptidyl-tRNA linkage. Consequently, ribosomes stall at the uORF2 termination codon and obstruct downstream translation. Since termination appears to be the critical step affected by translation of uORF2, we examined the role of eukaryotic release factors 1 and 3 (eRF1 and eRF3) in the inhibitory mechanism. In support of the hypothesis that an interaction between eRF1 and uORF2 contributes to uORF2 inhibitory activity, specific residues in each protein, glycines 183 and 184 of the eRF1 GGQ motif and prolines 21 and 22 of the uORF2 peptide, were found to be necessary for full inhibition of downstream translation. Immunoblot analyses revealed that eRF1, but not eRF3, accumulated in the uORF2-stalled ribosome complex. Finally, increased puromycin sensitivity was observed after depletion of eRF1 from the stalled ribosome complex, consistent with inhibition of peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis resulting from an eRF1-uORF2 peptidyl-tRNA interaction. These results reveal the paradoxical potential for interactions between a nascent peptide and eRF1 to obstruct the translation termination cascade.

Comprehensive sequence analysis of translation termination sites in various eukaryotes

Recent investigations into the translation termination sites of various organisms have revealed that not only stop codons but also sequences around stop codons have an effect on translation termination. To investigate the relationship between these sequence patterns and translation as well as its termination efficiency, we analysed the correlation between strength of consensus and translation efficiency, as predicted according to Codon Adaptation Index (CAI) value. We used RIKEN full-length mouse cDNA sequences and ten other eukaryotic UniGene datasets from NCBI for the analyses. First, we conducted sequence profile analyses following translation termination sites. We found base G and A at position +1 as a strong consensus for mouse cDNA. A similar consensus was found for other mammals, such as Homo sapiens, Rattus norvegicus and Bos taurus. However, some plants had different consensus sequences. We then analysed the correlation between the strength of consensus at each position and the codon biases of whole coding regions, using information content and CAI value. The results showed that in mouse cDNA, CAI value had a positive correlation with information content at positions +1. We also found that, for positions with strong consensus, the strength of the consensus is likely to have a positive correlation with CAI value in some other eukaryotes. Along with these observations, biological insights into the relationship between gene expression level, codon biases and consensus sequence around stop codons will be discussed.

The invariant uridine of stop codons contacts the conserved NIKSR loop of human eRF1 in the ribosome

To unravel the region of human eukaryotic release factor 1 (eRF1) that is close to stop codons within the ribosome, we used mRNAs containing a single photoactivatable 4-thiouridine (s(4)U) residue in the first position of stop or control sense codons. Accurate phasing of these mRNAs onto the ribosome was achieved by the addition of tRNA(Asp). Under these conditions, eRF1 was shown to crosslink exclusively to mRNAs containing a stop or s(4)UGG codon. A procedure that yielded (32)P-labeled eRF1 deprived of the mRNA chain was developed; analysis of the labeled peptides generated after specific cleavage of both wild-type and mutant eRF1s maps the crosslink in the tripeptide KSR (positions 63-65 of human eRF1) and points to K63 located in the conserved NIKS loop as the main crosslinking site. These data directly show the interaction of the N-terminal (N) domain of eRF1 with stop codons within the 40S ribosomal subunit and provide strong support for the positioning of the eRF1 middle (M) domain on the 60S subunit. Thus, the N and M domains mimic the tRNA anticodon and acceptor arms, respectively.

Conversion of omnipotent translation termination factor eRF1 into ciliate-like UGA-only unipotent eRF1

In eukaryotic ribosomes, termination of translation is triggered by class 1 polypeptide release factor, eRF1. In organisms with a universal code, eRF1 responds to three stop codons, whereas, in ciliates with variant codes, only one or two codon(s) remain(s) as stop signals. By mutagenesis of the Y-C-F minidomain of the N domain, we converted an omnipotent human eRF1 recognizing all three stop codons into a unipotent 'ciliate-like' UGA-only eRF1. The conserved Cys127 located in the Y-C-F minidomain plays a critical role in stop codon recognition. The UGA-only response has also been achieved by concomitant substitutions of four other amino acids located at the Y-C-F and NIKS minidomains of eRF1. We suggest that for eRF1 the stop codon decoding is of a non-linear (non-protein-anticodon) type and explores a combination of positive and negative determinants. We assume that stop codon recognition is profoundly different by eukaryotic and prokaryotic class 1 RFs.

Isolation and expression of two genes encoding eukaryotic release factor 1 from Paramecium tetraurelia

Paramecium tetraurelia, like some other ciliate species, uses an alternative nuclear genetic code where UAA and UAG are translated as glutamine and UGA is the only stop codon. It has been postulated that the use of stop codons as sense codons is dependent on the presence of specific tRNAs and on modification of eukaryotic release factor one (eRF1), a factor involved in stop codon recognition during translation termination. We describe here the isolation and characterisation of two genes, eRF1-a and eRF1 b, coding for eRF1 in P. tetraurelia. The two genes are very similar, both in genomic organization and in sequence, and might result from a recent duplication event. The two coding sequences are 1,314 nucleotides long, and encode two putative proteins of 437 amino acids with 98.5% identity. Interestingly, when compared with the eRF1 sequences either of ciliates having the same variant genetic code, or of other eukaryotes, the eRF1 of P. tetraurelia exhibits significant differences in the N-terminal region, which is thought to interact with stop codons. We discuss here the consequences of these changes in the light of recent models proposed to explain the mechanism of stop codon recognition in eukaryotes. Besides, analysis of the expression of the two genes by Northern blotting and primer extension reveals that these genes exhibit a differential expression during vegetative growth and autogamy.

Omnipotent decoding potential resides in eukaryotic translation termination factor eRF1 of variant-code organisms and is modulated by the interactions of amino acid sequences within domain 1

In eukaryotes, a single translational release factor, eRF1, deciphers three stop codons, although its decoding mechanism remains puzzling. In the ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila, UAA and UAG codons are reassigned to Gln codons. A yeast eRF1-domain swap containing Tetrahymena domain 1 responded only to UGA in vitro and failed to complement a defect in yeast eRF1 in vivo at 37 degrees C. This finding demonstrates that decoding specificity of eRF1 from variant code organisms resides at domain 1. However, the wild-type eRF1 hybrid fully restored the growth of eRF1-deficient yeast at 30 degrees C. Tetrahymena eRF1 contains a variant sequence, KATNIKD, at the tip of domain 1. The TASNIKD variant of hybrid eRF1 rendered the eRF1-nullified yeast viable, although in an in vitro assay, the same hybrid eRF1 responded only to UGA. Nevertheless, the yeast eRF1 bearing the KATNIKD motif instead of the TASNIKS heptapeptide present in higher eukaryotes remains omnipotent in vivo. Collectively, these data suggest that variant genetic code organisms like Tetrahymena have an intrinsic potential to decode three stop codons in vivo, and that interaction within domain 1 between the KAT tripeptide and other sequences modulates the decoding specificity of Tetrahymena eRF1.

Positioning of the mRNA stop signal with respect to polypeptide chain release factors and ribosomal proteins in 80S ribosomes

To study positioning of the mRNA stop signal with respect to polypeptide chain release factors (RFs) and ribosomal components within human 80S ribosomes, photoreactive mRNA analogs were applied. Derivatives of the UUCUAAA heptaribonucleotide containing the UUC codon for Phe and the stop signal UAAA, which bore a perfluoroaryl azido group at either the fourth nucleotide or the 3'-terminal phosphate, were synthesized. The UUC codon was directed to the ribosomal P site by the cognate tRNA(Phe), targeting the UAA stop codon to the A site. Mild UV irradiation of the ternary complexes consisting of the 80S ribosome, the mRNA analog and tRNA resulted in tRNA-dependent crosslinking of the mRNA analogs to the 40S ribosomal proteins and the 18S rRNA. mRNA analogs with the photoreactive group at the fourth uridine (the first base of the stop codon) crosslinked mainly to protein S15 (and much less to S2). For the 3'-modified mRNA analog, the major crosslinking target was protein S2, while protein S15 was much less crosslinked. Crosslinking of eukaryotic (e) RF1 was entirely dependent on the presence of a stop signal in the mRNA analog. eRF3 in the presence of eRF1 did not crosslink, but decreased the yield of eRF1 crosslinking. We conclude that (i) proteins S15 and S2 of the 40S ribosomal subunit are located near the A site-bound codon; (ii) eRF1 can induce spatial rearrangement of the 80S ribosome leading to movement of protein L4 of the 60S ribosomal subunit closer to the codon located at the A site; (iii) within the 80S ribosome, eRF3 in the presence of eRF1 does not contact the stop codon at the A site and is probably located mostly (if not entirely) on the 60S subunit.

Highly conserved NIKS tetrapeptide is functionally essential in eukaryotic translation termination factor eRF1

Class-1 polypeptide chain release factors (RFs) play a key role in translation termination. Eukaryotic (eRF1) and archaeal class-1 RFs possess a highly conserved Asn-Ile-Lys-Ser (NIKS) tetrapeptide located at the N-terminal domain of human eRF1. In the three-dimensional structure, NIKS forms a loop between helices. The universal occurrence and exposed nature of this motif provoke the appearance of hypotheses postulating an essential role of this tetrapeptide in stop codon recognition and ribosome binding. To approach this problem experimentally, site-directed mutagenesis of the NIKS (positions 61-64) in human eRF1 and adjacent amino acids has been applied followed by determination of release activity and ribosome-binding capacity of mutants. Substitutions of Asn61 and Ile62 residues of the NIKS cause a decrease in the ability of eRF1 mutants to promote termination reaction in vitro, but to a different extent depending on the stop codon specificity, position, and nature of the substituting residues. This observation points to a possibility that Asn-Ile dipeptide modulates the specific recognition of the stop codons by eRF1. Some replacements at positions 60, 63, and 64 cause a negligible (if any) effect in contrast to what has been deduced from some current hypotheses predicting the structure of the termination codon recognition site in eRF1. Reduction in ribosome binding revealed for Ile62, Ser64, Arg65, and Arg68 mutants argues in favor of the essential role played by the right part of the NIKS loop in interaction with the ribosome, most probably with ribosomal RNA.

Convergence and constraint in eukaryotic release factor 1 (eRF1) domain 1: the evolution of stop codon specificity

Class 1 release factor in eukaryotes (eRF1) recognizes stop codons and promotes peptide release from the ribosome. The 'molecular mimicry' hypothesis suggests that domain 1 of eRF1 is analogous to the tRNA anticodon stem-loop. Recent studies strongly support this hypothesis and several models for specific interactions between stop codons and residues in domain 1 have been proposed. In this study we have sequenced and identified novel eRF1 sequences across a wide diversity of eukaryotes and re-evaluated the codon-binding site by bioinformatic analyses of a large eRF1 dataset. Analyses of the eRF1 structure combined with estimates of evolutionary rates at amino acid sites allow us to define the residues that are under structural (i.e. those involved in intramolecular interactions) versus non-structural selective constraints. Furthermore, we have re-assessed convergent substitutions in the ciliate variant code eRF1s using maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic approaches. Our results favor the model proposed by Bertram et al. that stop codons bind to three 'cavities' on the protein surface, although we suggest that the stop codon may bind in the opposite orientation to the original model. We assess the feasibility of this alternative binding orientation with a triplet stop codon and the eRF1 domain 1 structures using molecular modeling techniques.

Polypeptide release factors in prokaryotes and eukaryotes: same function, different structure

Although the eukaryotic (eRF1) and prokaryotic (RF2) polypeptide release (translation termination) factors are functionally similar, they turn out to be very different in overall shape and architecture and in the location of key functional elements.

Class-1 translation termination factors: invariant GGQ minidomain is essential for release activity and ribosome binding but not for stop codon recognition

Previously, we have shown that all class-1 polypeptide release factors (RFs) share a common glycine-glycine-glutamine (GGQ) motif, which is critical for RF activity. Here, we subjected to site-directed mutagenesis two invariant amino acids, Gln185 and Arg189, situated in the GGQ minidomain of human eRF1, followed by determination of RF activity and the ribosome binding capacity for mutant eRF1. We show that replacement of Gln185 with polar amino acid residues causes partial inactivation of RF activity; Gln185Ile, Arg189Ala and Arg189Gln mutants are completely inactive; all mutants that retain partial RF activity respond similarly to three stop codons. We suggest that loss of RF activity for Gln185 and Arg189 mutants is caused by distortion of the conformation of the GGQ minidomain but not by damage of the stop codon recognition site of eRF1. Our data are inconsistent with the model postulating direct involvement of Gln185 side chain in orientation of water molecule toward peptidyl-tRNA ester bond at the ribosomal peptidyl transferase centre. Most of the Gln185 mutants exhibit reduced ability to bind to the ribosome, probably, to rRNA and/or (peptidyl)-tRNA(s). The data suggest that the GGQ motif is implicated both in promoting peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis and binding to the ribosome.

Stop codon recognition in ciliates: Euplotes release factor does not respond to reassigned UGA codon

In eukaryotes, the polypeptide release factor 1 (eRF1) is involved in translation termination at all three stop codons. However, the mechanism for decoding stop codons remains unknown. A direct interaction of eRF1 with the stop codons has been postulated. Recent studies focus on eRF1 from ciliates in which some stop codons are reassigned to sense codons. Using an in vitro assay based on mammalian ribosomes, we show that eRF1 from the ciliate Euplotes aediculatus responds to UAA and UAG as stop codons and lacks the capacity to decipher the UGA codon, which encodes cysteine in this organism. This result strongly suggests that in ciliates with variant genetic codes eRF1 does not recognize the reassigned codons. Recent hypotheses describing stop codon discrimination by eRF1 are not fully consistent with the set of eRF1 sequences available so far and require direct experimental testing.

The polypeptide chain release factor eRF1 specifically contacts the s(4)UGA stop codon located in the A site of eukaryotic ribosomes

It has been shown previously [Brown, C.M. & Tate, W.P. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 33164-33170.] that the polypeptide chain release factor RF2 involved in translation termination in prokaryotes was able to photocrossreact with mini-messenger RNAs containing stop signals in which U was replaced by 4-thiouridine (s4U). Here, using the same strategy we have monitored photocrosslinking to eukaryotic ribosomal components of 14-mer mRNA in the presence of tRNA(f)(Met), and 42-mer mRNA in the presence of tRNA(Asp) (tRNA(Asp) gene transcript). We show that: (a) both 14-mer and 42-mer mRNAs crossreact with ribosomal RNA and ribosomal proteins. The patterns of the crosslinked ribosomal proteins are similar with both mRNAs and sensitive to ionic conditions; (b) the crosslinking patterns obtained with 42-mer mRNAs show characteristic modification upon addition of tRNA(Asp) providing evidence for appropriate mRNA phasing onto the ribosome. Similar changes are not detected with the 14-mer mRNA.tRNA(f)(Met) pairs; (c) when eukaryotic polypeptide chain release factor 1 (eRF1) is added to the ribosome.tRNA(Asp) complex it crossreacts with the 42-mer mRNA containing the s(4)UGA stop codon located in the A site, but not with the s(4)UCA sense codon; this crosslink involves the N-terminal and middle domains of eRF1 but not the C domain which interacts with eukaryotic polypeptide chain release factor 3 (eRF3); (d) addition of eRF3 has no effect on the yield of eRF1-42-mer mRNA crosslinking and eRF3 does not crossreact with 42-mer mRNA. These experiments delineate the in vitro conditions allowing optimal phasing of mRNA on the eukaryotic ribosome and demonstrate a direct and specific contact of 'core' eRF1 and s(4)UGA stop codon within the ribosomal A site.

Class I release factors in ciliates with variant genetic codes

In eukaryotes with the universal genetic code a single class I release factor (eRF1) most probably recognizes all stop codons (UAA, UAG and UGA) and is essential for termination of nascent peptide synthesis. It is well established that stop codons have been reassigned to amino acid codons at least three times among ciliates. The codon specificities of ciliate eRF1s must have been modified to accommodate the variant codes. In this study we have amplified, cloned and sequenced eRF1 genes of two hypotrichous ciliates, Oxytricha trifallax (UAA and UAG for Gln) and Euplotes aediculatus (UGA for Cys). We also sequenced/identified three protist and two archaeal class I RF genes to enlarge the database of eRF1/aRF1s with the universal code. Extensive comparisons between universal code eRF1s and those of Oxytricha, Euplotes, and Tetrahymena which represent three lineages that acquired variant codes independently, provide important clues to identify stop codon-binding regions in eRF1. Domain 1 in the five ciliate eRF1s, particularly the TASNIKS heptapeptide and its adjacent region, differs significantly from domain 1 in universal code eRF1s. This observation suggests that domain 1 contains the codon recognition site, but that the mechanism of eRF1 codon recognition may be more complex than proposed by Nakamura et al. or Knight and Landweber.

Genetic interaction between yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae release factors and the decoding region of 18 S rRNA

Functional and structural similarities between tRNA and eukaryotic class 1 release factors (eRF1) described previously, provide evidence for the molecular mimicry concept. This concept is supported here by the demonstration of a genetic interaction between eRF1 and the decoding region of the ribosomal RNA, the site of tRNA-mRNA interaction. We show that the conditional lethality caused by a mutation in domain 1 of yeast eRF1 (P86A), that mimics the tRNA anticodon stem-loop, is rescued by compensatory mutations A1491G (rdn15) and U1495C (hyg1) in helix 44 of the decoding region and by U912C (rdn4) and G886A (rdn8) mutations in helix 27 of the 18 S rRNA. The rdn15 mutation creates a C1409-G1491 base-pair in yeast rRNA that is analogous to that in prokaryotic rRNA known to be important for high-affinity paromomycin binding to the ribosome. Indeed, rdn15 makes yeast cells extremely sensitive to paromomycin, indicating that the natural high resistance of the yeast ribosome to paromomycin is, in large part, due to the absence of the 1409-1491 base-pair. The rdn15 and hyg1 mutations also partially compensate for inactivation of the eukaryotic release factor 3 (eRF3) resulting from the formation of the [PSI+] prion, a self-reproducible termination-deficient conformation of eRF3. However, rdn15, but not hyg1, rescues the conditional cell lethality caused by a GTPase domain mutation (R419G) in eRF3. Other antisuppressor rRNA mutations, rdn2(G517A), rdn1T(C1054T) and rdn12A(C526A), strongly inhibit [PSI+]-mediated stop codon read-through but do not cure cells of the [PSI+] prion. Interestingly, cells bearing hyg1 seem to enable [PSI+] strains to accumulate larger Sup35p aggregates upon Sup35p overproduction, suggesting a lower toxicity of overproduced Sup35p when the termination defect, caused by [PSI+], is partly relieved.

The molecular basis of nuclear genetic code change in ciliates

BACKGROUND

The nuclear genetic code has changed in several lineages of ciliates. These changes, UAR to glutamine and UGA to cysteine, imply that eukaryotic release factor 1 (eRF1), the protein that recognizes stop codons and terminates translation, changes specificity. Here we test whether changes in eRF1 drive genetic code evolution.

RESULTS

Database sequence analysis reveals numerous genetic code alterations in ciliates, including UGA --> tryptophan in Blepharisma americanum and the distantly related Colpoda. We sequenced eRF1 from four ciliates: B. americanum, a heterotrich that independently derived the same eRF1 specificity as Euplotes, and three spirotrichs, Stylonychia lemnae, S. mytilus, and Oxytricha trifallax, that independently derived the same genetic code as Tetrahymena (UAR --> glutamine). Distantly related ciliates with similar codes show characteristic changes in eRF1. We used a sliding window analysis to test associations between changes in specific eRF1 residues and changes in the genetic code. The regions of eRF1 that display convergent substitutions are identical to those identified in a recently reported nonsense suppression mutant screen in yeast.

CONCLUSIONS

Genetic code change by stop codon reassignment is surprisingly frequent in ciliates, with UGA --> tryptophan occurring twice independently. This is the first description of this code, previously found only in bacteria and mitochondria, in a eukaryotic nuclear genome. eRF1 has evolved strikingly convergently in lineages with variant genetic codes. The strong concordance with biochemical data indicates that our methodology may be generally useful for detecting molecular determinants of biochemical changes in evolution.

Molecular evolution: Please release me, genetic code

The genetic code is no longer universal, even in non-mitochondrial genomes. Recent studies have implicated the eukaryotic release factor eRF1 in mediating coding changes that are not as inconceivable as once thought. Specific residues in eRF1 proteins can be correlated with specific code changes in a wide variety of taxa.

Molecular mechanism of stop codon recognition by eRF1: a wobble hypothesis for peptide anticodons

We propose that the amino acid residues 57/58 and 60/61 of eukaryotic release factors (eRF1s) (counted from the N-terminal Met of human eRF1) are responsible for stop codon recognition in protein synthesis. The proposal is based on amino acid exchanges in these positions in the eRF1s of two ciliates that reassigned one or two stop codons to sense codons in evolution and on the crystal structure of human eRF1. The proposed mechanism of stop codon recognition assumes that the amino acid residues 57/58 interact with the second and the residues 60/61 with the third position of a stop codon. The fact that conventional eRF1s recognize all three stop codons but not the codon for tryptophan is attributed to the flexibility of the helix containing these residues. We suggest that the helix is able to assume a partly relaxed or tight conformation depending on the stop codon recognized. The restricted codon recognition observed in organisms with unconventional eRF1s is attributed mainly to the loss of flexibility of the helix due to exchanged amino acids.

Translational termination comes of age

Translational termination has been a largely ignored aspect of protein synthesis for many years. However, the recent identification of new release-factor genes, the mapping of release-factor functional sites and in vitro reconstitution experiments have provided a deeper understanding of the termination mechanism. In addition, protein-protein interactions among release factors and with other proteins have been revealed. The three-dimensional structures of a prokaryotic ribosome recycling factor and eukaryotic release factor 1 (eRF1) mimic the shape of transfer RNA, indicating that they bind to the same ribosomal site. Post-termination events in bacteria have been clarified, linking termination, ribosomal recycling and translation initiation.