Specificity of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assays designed for the detection of circulating cancer cells is influenced by cytokines in vivo and in vitro

Comparison of progenitor cell collection on day 4 or day 5 after steady-state stimulation with G-CSF alone in breast cancer patients: influence on CD34+ cell yield, subpopulation, and breast cancer cell contamination

To determine the influence of apheresis timing on CD34+ cell yield, subpopulation, and breast cancer cell contamination, 48 women with breast cancer were stimulated from steady-state hematopoiesis in a prospective but nonrandomized study with 2 x 5 microg/kg G-CSF s.c. alone, and apheresis was started either on day 4 (n = 24) or day 5 (n = 24). Forty-eight women with breast cancer (stage II/III, n = 30; stage IV; n = 12; inflammatory, n = 6) and a median age of 44 years were well balanced between the two groups. In group I, aphersis was started on day 4 and additionally performed on day 5 after G-CSF stimulation, and in group II, apheresis was started on day 5. CD34+ cell count and CD34+ cell subpopulation were determined according to international criteria. Breast cancer cell contamination was detected by immunocytology. The median CD34+ cell harvest on day 4 was 3.3 x 10(6)/kg body weight (range 0.5-12.8) and 6 x 10(6)/kg BW (range 0.3-30) for patients starting on day 5 (p = 0.01). Those patients starting on day 4 achieved a median CD34+ cell count of 4 x 10(6)/kg (range 0.7-13) on day 5 (NS). Twenty-one percent of group I and 71% of group II achieved >5 x 10(6)/kg BW CD34+ cells in the first apheresis, whereas <2.5 x 10(6)/kg BW CD34+ cells in the first apheresis were observed in 38% of group I and 16% of group II. No differences were observed between the CD34+ cell subpopulations, CD34+/CD38+ (10.5% versus 10.5%) and CD34+/Thyl+ (1.5% versus 1.8%). The CD34+ cell harvest from consecutive collecting on days 4 and 5 was nearly identical to the harvest starting on day 5 (6.4 versus 6 x 10(6)/kg). Collecting CD34+ progenitor cells after stimulation with G-CSF alone on day 5 results in a significantly higher cell yield than starting collecting on day 4. No differences in respect to breast cancer cell contamination and CD34+ cell subpopulation were observed.

Detection and clinical relevance of micrometastatic cancer cells

The failure to reduce mortality of epithelial cancer patients is probably a result of the early dissemination of cancer cells to secondary sites, which is usually missed by conventional diagnostic procedures used for tumor staging. Individual carcinoma cells present in regional lymph nodes, blood, or distant organs (eg, bone marrow) can be detected by sensitive immunologic or molecular methods. Because the goal of adjuvant therapy is the eradication of occult micrometastatic tumor cells before metastatic disease becomes clinically evident, the early detection of micrometastases could identify those patients who might benefit from adjuvant therapy. In addition, more sensitive methods for detecting such cells should increase knowledge about the biologic mechanisms of metastasis, which might improve the diagnosis and treatment of micrometastatic disease. In this article, the recent developments in sensitive assays used for the detection of individual micrometastatic cancer cells in patients with epithelial tumors are reviewed.

Detection of micrometastasis by cytokeratin 20 RT-PCR is limited due to stable background transcription in granulocytes

The reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) amplification of cytokeratin 20 (CK20) mRNA is considered a promising candidate method for the detection of circulating tumour cells in bone marrow and peripheral blood of cancer patients. In this study we have investigated the diagnostic specificity of the CK20 mRNA detection in samples from healthy donors (HD; n = 33), intensive care units patients (ICU; n = 20) and bone marrow obtained from patients suffering from chronic inflammatory diseases (CID; n = 14). RNAs purified from stabilized lysates showed positive results in 24% of the HD group (8/33), 35% of the ICU group (8/20) and in 40% of the CID group (5/14). The use of Ficoll gradients to separate nucleated cells completely restored the specificity of this CK20 RT-PCR assay. The CK20-expressing cells are positively identified to belong to the granulocyte fraction of leucocytes, which appear to express the gene on a background level. Our results demonstrate for the first time that CK20 mRNA expression is not limited to epithelium. Its occurrence in normal granulocytes has to be considered in tests designed to detect circulating cancer cells or micrometastases.

Detection and clinical importance of micrometastatic disease

Metastatic relapse in patients with solid tumors is caused by systemic preoperative or perioperative dissemination of tumor cells. The presence of individual tumor cells in bone marrow and in peripheral blood can be detected by immunologic or molecular methods and is being regarded increasingly as a clinically relevant prognostic factor. Because the goal of adjuvant therapy is the eradication of occult micrometastatic tumor cells before metastatic disease becomes clinically evident, the early detection of micrometastases could identify the patients who are most (and least) likely to benefit from adjuvant therapy. In addition, more sensitive methods for detecting such cells should increase knowledge about the biologic mechanisms of metastasis and improve the diagnosis and treatment of micrometastatic disease. In contrast to solid metastatic tumors, micrometastatic tumor cells are appropriate targets for intravenously applied agents because macromolecules and immunocompetent effector cells should have access to the tumor cells. Because the majority of micrometastatic tumor cells may be nonproliferative (G0 phase), standard cytotoxic chemotherapies aimed at proliferating cells may be less effective, which might explain, in part, the failure of chemotherapy. Thus, adjuvant therapies that are aimed at dividing and quiescent cells, such as antibody-based therapies, are of considerable interest. From a literature search that used the databases MEDLINE(R), CANCERLIT(R), Biosis(R), Embase(R), and SciSearch(R), we discuss the current state of research on minimal residual cancer in patients with epithelial tumors and the diagnostic and clinical implications of these findings.

Tumour cell detection in G-CSF mobilised stem cell harvests of patients with breast cancer

Peripheral blood stem cells were mobilised with G-CSF from steady-state haemopoiesis after previous anthracyclin-containing standard dose chemotherapy in patients with high-risk breast cancer. 48 samples were obtained from patients with stage II-III breast cancer and > or = 10 lymph nodes, 15 samples from patients with chemotherapy sensitive metastatic disease, and 13 samples from women with inflammatory breast cancer. 44 samples were first or single leukaphereses and 32 samples were second or third harvests. Aliquots were searched for contaminating tumour cells by immunocytochemistry (IC) and cytokeratin-19 reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction rtPCR). The median count of MNCs examined by IC was 2 x 10(6); cDNA prepared from 2 x 10(7) cells was subjected to PCR. Fifty-nine samples were examined by immunocytochemistry, 36 samples by rtPCR, and 19 samples by both techniques. Samples investigated by IC and rtPCR were judged as positive if there was at least one positive test. On the whole, 42/79 (55.3%) of the samples were positive with an insignificant trend to a higher positivity rate in second or subsequent leukaphereses (52.3% vs 59.3%). The median tumour cell load per 10(6) MNCs was low with 0.5 (0-7) cells in all, and a total of 2.2 (0.5-7) cells in positive specimen. Differences in the cancer cell load of first and subsequent leukaphereses and between subgroups of patients were not found. PCR and IC gave consistent results in 63.2%. This phenomenon can be explained by the greater sensitivity of the molecular method and by a Poisson distribution of coharvested tumour cells in samples. Tumour cell contamination in G-CSF mobilised stem cells from patients with breast cancer from steady state haemopoiesis after preceding anthacyclin-containing chemotherapy is frequent, but the tumour cell load is low. To allow a comparison of different studies dealing with cancer cell contamination in stem cells, standardisation of assays is necessary.