Allogeneic hemopoietic SCT for patients with primary myelofibrosis: a predictive transplant score based on transfusion requirement, spleen size and donor type

Spleen deflation and beyond: the pros and cons of Janus kinase 2 inhibitor therapy for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms

The myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), and primary myelofibrosis (MF) are malignancies that frequently harbor the recurrent somatic point mutation JAK2(V617F). The discovery of this mutation has fueled the development of Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitors. Available results have indicated that JAK2 inhibitors are particularly effective at reducing spleen size. However, the activity of these agents is multifaceted and also involves a marked improvement of systemic symptoms and, for those agents with dual JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitory activity, a marked reduction in the levels of circulating cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of the disease. Because JAK2 inhibitors are not specific for JAK2(V617F), responses have also been observed in JAK2(V617F) -negative MPNs because of the inhibition of wild-type JAK2, which is also likely responsible for the induction of cytopenias in patients with MF and for the normalization of peripheral blood counts observed in patients with ET or PV. Given the distinct mortality and morbidity associated with ET, PV, and MF, the use of JAK2 inhibitors appears reasonable for patients with MF as well as for those with ET or PV who have become resistant or intolerant to hydroxyurea. Ongoing randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials will further delineate the role of these agents in the management of patients with MPNs. The pros and cons of JAK2 kinase inhibitor therapy are herein discussed.

Risk models predicting survival after reduced-intensity transplantation for myelofibrosis

To define a prognostic model for predicting outcome of reduced-intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation (RIC-ASCT) for myelofibrosis we evaluated 150 homogeneously treated patients and developed a new risk score for overall survival (OS). In a multivariate Cox model for OS, only JAK2 V617F wild-type, age ≥57 years and constitutional symptoms were independently predictive for OS (Hazard Ratio: 2·02; 2·43 and 2·80 respectively). Depending on the presence of one, two or all of these factors, HR of death was 3·08; 4·70 and 16·61 respectively (P < 0·001). This score was compared to the Lille, Cervantes, International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), dynamic IPSS (DIPSS) and modified European Blood and Marrow Transplantation Group (EBMT) scores. Lille score correlated significantly with OS but discriminated poorly between the intermediate and high-risk groups (5-year OS 56% and 51% respectively). IPSS and DIPSS correlated significantly with OS but differences between intermediate-1 and intermediate-2 groups were not significant (5-year OS 78% vs. 78% and 70%, 60% respectively). Modified EBMT and Cervantes models did not predict OS post-ASCT. In conclusion, a simple model which includes: age, JAK2 V617F-status and constitutional symptoms can clearly separate distinct risk groups and can be used in addition to the Lille model to predict OS after RIC-ASCT for myelofibrosis.

Predictors of greater than 80% 2-year mortality in primary myelofibrosis: a Mayo Clinic study of 884 karyotypically annotated patients

DIPSS-plus (the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System-plus) includes 8 risk factors for survival in primary myelofibrosis. In the present study of 884 karyotypically annotated patients with primary myelofibrosis, we sought to identify 1 or 2 parameters that can reliably predict death in the first 2 years of disease. After a median of 8.2 years from time of referral to the Mayo Clinic, 564 deaths (64% of patients in the study) had been recorded. Risk factors associated with > 80% 2-year mortality included monosomal karyotype, inv(3)/i(17q) abnormalities, or any 2 of the following: circulating blasts > 9%, leukocytes ≥ 40 × 10(9)/L, or other unfavorable karyotype. Patients with any 1 of these risk profiles (n = 52) displayed significantly shorter overall survival than those otherwise belonging to a high-risk category per DIPSS-plus (n = 298); respective median survivals were 9 and 23 months (hazard ratio 2.2, 95% confidence interval 1.6-3.1; P < .01). The present information complements DIPSS-plus in the selection of primary myelofibrosis patients for high-risk treatment approaches.

New JAK2 inhibitors for myeloproliferative neoplasms

INTRODUCTION

The discovery of the JAK(V617F) kinase established a common pathogenetic link to the most important types of Philadelphia-chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs): polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). More importantly, the demonstration of constitutive kinase activity emanating from the JAK2 protein provided the rationale for the development of small-molecule JAK2 kinase inhibitors.

AREAS COVERED

Several JAK2 kinase inhibitors are being tested in clinical trials for patients with MPNs. In PMF trials, JAK2 inhibitors have been shown to produce rapid reductions in spleen size and marked improvements in constitutional symptoms and quality of life. In ET and/or PV, JAK2 inhibitors normalize hematocrit, platelets and WBC, and spleen size in a large number of patients that are resistant or intolerant to hydroxyurea. JAK2 inhibitors are not specific for the JAK2V617F mutant protein. Rather, they inhibit the JAK2- signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway and therefore any patient with MPN may benefit from therapy regardless of JAK2 mutational status.

EXPERT OPINION

JAK2 inhibitors induce clinically relevant responses in a large proportion of patients with MPNs. Because JAK kinase activation underlies the pathogenesis of other disorders, such as autoimmune and rheumatological disorders, the paradigm of JAK inhibition may translate into novel therapies for a variety of human diseases.

Experimental therapeutics for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasias

Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are characterized by stem cell-derived, unrestrained clonal myeloproliferation. The World Health Organization classification system, proposed in 2008, identifies 7 distinct categories of Ph-negative MPNs including essential thrombocythemia (ET); polycythemia vera (PV); primary myelofibrosis (PMF); mastocytosis; chronic eosinophilic leukemia; chronic neutrophilic leukemia; and MPN, unclassifiable. For many years, the treatment of ET, PV, and PMF, the most frequently diagnosed Ph-negative MPNs, has been largely supportive. In recent years, that paradigm has been challenged because of the discovery of a recurrent point mutation in the Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) gene (JAK2(V617F)). This mutation can be detected in the vast majority of patients with PV and approximately half of patients with ET or PMF and serves as both a diagnostic marker as well as representing a putative molecular target for drug development. Several putative targeted agents with significant in vitro JAK2 inhibitory activity and various degrees of JAK2 specificity are currently undergoing clinical evaluation. Furthermore, other investigational non-tyrosine kinase inhibitor approaches such as immunomodulatory agents and pegylated interferon- have also shown promising results in MPNs.

Janus kinase inhibitors for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasias and beyond

Recent advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis of the Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms, polycythaemia vera, essential thrombocythaemia and myelofibrosis have led to the identification of the mutation V617F in Janus kinase (JAK) as a potential therapeutic target. This information has prompted the development of ATP-competitive JAK2 inhibitors. Therapy with JAK2 inhibitors may induce rapid and marked reductions in spleen size and can lead to remarkable improvements in constitutional symptoms and overall quality of life. Because JAKs are involved in the pathogenesis of inflammatory and immune-mediated disorders, JAK inhibitors are also being tested in clinical trials in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis, as well as for the treatment of other autoimmune diseases and for the prevention of allograft rejection. Preliminary results indicate that these agents hold great promise for the treatment of JAK-driven disorders.

Philadelphia-negative classical myeloproliferative neoplasms: critical concepts and management recommendations from European LeukemiaNet

We present a review of critical concepts and produce recommendations on the management of Philadelphia-negative classical myeloproliferative neoplasms, including monitoring, response definition, first- and second-line therapy, and therapy for special issues. Key questions were selected according the criterion of clinical relevance. Statements were produced using a Delphi process, and two consensus conferences involving a panel of 21 experts appointed by the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) were convened. Patients with polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) should be defined as high risk if age is greater than 60 years or there is a history of previous thrombosis. Risk stratification in primary myelofibrosis (PMF) should start with the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) for newly diagnosed patients and dynamic IPSS for patients being seen during their disease course, with the addition of cytogenetics evaluation and transfusion status. High-risk patients with PV should be managed with phlebotomy, low-dose aspirin, and cytoreduction, with either hydroxyurea or interferon at any age. High-risk patients with ET should be managed with cytoreduction, using hydroxyurea at any age. Monitoring response in PV and ET should use the ELN clinicohematologic criteria. Corticosteroids, androgens, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, and immunomodulators are recommended to treat anemia of PMF, whereas hydroxyurea is the first-line treatment of PMF-associated splenomegaly. Indications for splenectomy include symptomatic portal hypertension, drug-refractory painful splenomegaly, and frequent RBC transfusions. The risk of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation-related complications is justified in transplantation-eligible patients whose median survival time is expected to be less than 5 years.

Management of myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis (MF), either primary or arising from previous polycythemia vera (PV) or essential thrombocythemia (ET), is the worst among the chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms in terms of survival and quality of life. Patients with MF have to face several clinical issues that, because of the poor effectiveness of medical therapy, surgery or radiotherapy, represent largely unmet clinical needs. Powerful risk stratification systems, applicable either at diagnosis using the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) or during the variable course of illness using the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) and DIPSS Plus, allow recognition of categories of patients with survival times ranging from decades to < 2 years. These scores are especially important for therapeutic decisions that include allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allogeneic SCT), the only curative approach that still carries a nonnegligible risk of morbidity and mortality even with newest reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens. Discovery of JAK2V617F mutation prompted the development of clinical trials using JAK2 inhibitors; these agents overall have resulted in meaningful symptomatic improvement and reduction of splenomegaly that were otherwise not achievable with conventional therapy. Intriguing differences in the efficacy and tolerability of JAK2 inhibitors are being recognized, which could lead to a nonoverlapping spectrum of activity/safety. Other agents that do not directly target JAK2 and have shown symptomatic efficacy in MF are represented by inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and histone deacetylases (HDACs). Pomalidomide appears to be particularly active against MF-associated anemia. However, because these agents are all poorly effective in reducing the burden of mutated cells, further advancements are needed to move from enhancing our ability to palliate the disease to arriving at an actual cure for MF.

Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis: a report of the Société Française de Greffe de Moelle et de Thérapie Cellulaire (SFGM-TC)

Allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative treatment for myelofibrosis. We report an analysis of the Société Française de Greffe de Moelle et de Thérapie Cellulaire (SFGM-TC) registry including patients with myelofibrosis transplanted between 1997 and 2008. Potential risk factors affecting engraftment, non-relapse mortality (NRM), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analysed. One hundred and forty-seven patients, aged 20-68 (median 53) years, diagnosed with primary (53%) or secondary myelofibrosis underwent HSCT; 59% of patients were transplanted from a matched sibling donor. The conditioning regimen was myeloablative in 31% of patients. Ninety percent of the patients engrafted. Factors affecting favourably engraftment were splenectomy before HSCT, human leucocyte antigen (HLA) matched sibling donor, peripheral stem cell use as source of stem cells and absence of pre-transplant thrombocytopenia. Four-year OS, PFS and NRM survival were 39% (95%confidence interval [CI]: 31-50), 32% (95%CI: 24-43) and 39% (95%CI 30-48), respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that HLA-identical sibling donor, chronic phase disease and splenectomy in men had favourable impact on OS.

Reduced-intensity conditioning followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in myelofibrosis

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation offers a curative therapy for patients with myelofibrosis. Because of toxicity, allografting following myeloablative regimens is mainly applicable to young patients. With the introduction of dose-reduced conditioning using busulfan or melphalan with fludarabine, transplantation has become tolerable also for older patients. Implementation of antithymocyte globulin in the conditioning has resulted in effective prevention of graft-versus-host disease and an increased use of alternative donors. Through the discovery of new disease-specific mutations, close monitoring of residual disease became feasible in many patients and the outcome of posttransplant strategies improved. Still challenging is the achievement of new, transplant-derived models to estimate risk status and possible outcome for every individual patient, to help in therapeutic decision making and the determination of the optimal timing of stem cell transplantation. Such a tool may optimally include not only clinicomorphologic characteristics but also other potentially relevant factors such as cytogenetics and novel molecular markers.

Chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms: a collaborative approach

The classic chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) include different entities that pose significant challenges for their optimal diagnosis, treatment and overall management. Polycythemia Vera and Essential Thrombocythemia are the most common among chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs); major causes of morbidity and mortality are represented by arterial and venous thrombosis, as well as evolution to myelofibrosis or transformation to acute leukemia. However, survival is only minimally affected. Therapy aims at reducing the rate of thrombosis without increasing the risk of hematologic transformation which could be caused by exposure to cytotoxic drugs. On the other hand, survival is significantly reduced in primary myelofibrosis, and the clinical manifestations may be disabling. In the absence of therapies with the potential of curing the disease, a careful risk-oriented approach is employed for stratifying patients to the most appropriate, currently available, therapeutic options. In this brief review, we will discuss some of the key issues that can arise along the clinical course of MPNs and require an integrated, strictly patient-oriented, approach.

Outcome of allogeneic stem cell transplantation following reduced-intensity conditioninig regimen in patients with idiopathic myelofibrosis: the g.I.T.m.o. Experience

Background:

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is a potentially curative treatment for myelofibrosis (MI), though limited by a high rate of transplant-related mortality (TRM). In the present study we evaluate the outcome of MI patients undergoing an allogenic SCT after reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens, and the impact of prognostic factors.

Design and methods:

Fifty two patients were transplanted in 26 Italian centres between 1998 and 2006. We analyzed the influence of patient and disease clinical features before SCT and of transplant procedures on TRM and overall survival (OS) by means of univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results:

At SCT, median age was 52,5 years (32–68) and 89% of the patients had an intermediate or high Dupriez score. Conditioning regimens were based on fludarabine plus busulphan in 27% of patients, thiotepa plus cyclophosphamide in 46% and miscellaneous drug combinations in the other 27% of cases. Stem cells came from matched sibling donors for 75% of the patients and mismatched sibling or unrelated donors for the remaining 25%. The cumulative incidence of engraftment at day 90 after transplant was 83% (95% CI, 0.87–0.97). The estimated 1-year TRM was 30%. The estimated 3-year event-free-survival (EFS) and OS after hematopoietic SCT was 44% and 38% respectively. In multivariate analysis, an higher leukocyte count and circulating blasts in the peripheral blood before SCT significantly reduced EFS and OS respectively.

Interpretation and conclusions:

We conclude that the extension of the disease before transplantation based on the presence of circulating blasts and high leukocyte counts significantly affected the outcome after HSCT

Therapy of myelofibrosis (excluding JAK2 inhibitors)

Myelofibrosis shows a progressive clinical course and usually a poor, lethal prognosis. Allogeneic transplantation is an effective, potentially curable treatment approach although only a minority of patients may currently benefit from it. New effective treatment strategies are becoming available for this disease, including not only JAK2 inhibitors, but also other innovative drugs, targeting more general oncogenic mechanisms and the epigenetic control of cell proliferation and differentiation.

Assessing new therapies and their overall impact in myelofibrosis

Clinical management of myelofibrosis (MF)--whether primary or arising from an antecedent myeloproliferative neoplasm (post-essential thrombocythemia/polycythemia vera MF)--is currently in a period of transition that began with the discovery of the JAK2-V617F mutation 5 years ago. Selective JAK2 inhibitors have been developed, and clinical trials thus far have demonstrated that several of these agents meaningfully reduce MF-associated splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms. JAK2 inhibitors have durable benefits, act across the spectrum of MF subtypes, and provide a level of symptomatic benefit not seen with previous generations of nontargeted therapies. However, the JAK2 inhibitors can cause anemia and/or gastrointestinal disturbance, and their impact on JAK2 allele burden and the natural history is not yet fully defined. Several additional therapies that do not directly target JAK2 (eg, immunomodulatory drugs, histone deacetylase inhibitors, and inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin [mTOR]) may ameliorate MF-associated anemia and morbidity-inducing symptoms. Balancing the potential benefits of these new agents against the risks and benefits of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (which can be curative, but carries a high risk of treatment-associated morbidity and mortality) requires an accurate estimation of the prognosis for an individual patient. Enhanced prognostic modeling systems are helping us to better characterize prognosis in MF patients not only at diagnosis, but also along the dynamic and variable course of the illness. Future advancements in the efficacy of MF-targeted therapy will likely arise from new pathogenetic insights and from combining JAK2 inhibitors with other agents.