Strongly coupled binuclear uranium-oxo complexes from uranyl oxo rearrangement and reductive silylation

Structural/electronic properties and reaction energies of a series of mono- and bis-uranyl dihalides equatorially coordinated by N/O ligands

Monometallic (UO2)(X)2(L)3 (L = pyridine (py), X = F (1), Cl (2), Br (3) and I (4); L = tetrahydrofuran (thf), X = Cl (5); L = pyrrole (pl), X = Cl (6)) as well as bimetallic [(UO2)(μ2-X)(X)(L)2]2 (L = py, X = F (7), Cl (8), Br (9) and I (10); L = thf, X = Cl (11); L = pl, X = Cl (12); μ 2 = doubly bridged) were examined using relativistic density functional theory. With changing from F, Cl, Br to I irregardless of in mono- or bis-uranyl complexes, bond lengths of U = O were calculated to be decreasing, resulting from strengthening of axial U = O bonds while weakening equatorial X → U coordination. This is further evidenced by calculated bond orders of U = O and stretching vibrational frequencies. A similar situation was is found in 2, 5 and 6 as well as in 8, 11 and 12, where N/O ligands are varied but the chlorine atoms are retained. The present study reveals that all these complexes have U(f)-character low-lying unoccupied orbitals, and their π*(U = O) antibonds are located on higher-energy orbitals. Complex 1 was calculated to show σ(U = O) bonding character for HOMO, and pyridine-character for other occupied orbitals; the fluorine ligand occurs in a relatively low-energy region. In contrast, the π(p) characters of heavier halogen atoms significantly contribute to most frontier molecular orbitals of 2, 3 and 4. Unlike this electronic feature of 2, complexes 5 and 6 exhibit mainly thf and pyrrole characters, respectively, for their high-lying occupied orbitals. Electronic structures of bisuranyl complexes 7-12, albeit a little more complicated, are revealed to be similar to those of the corresponding monouranyl complexes. Finally, energies of formation reactions of the above complexes were calculated and compared with available experimental results.

Promising density functional theory methods for predicting the structures of uranyl complexes

By examining the overall accuracy of different theoretical methods in predicting the U–X bond distances (of a series uranyl complexes), we found that both the global-hybrid meta-GGA functional of BB1K and the range-seperated LC-BLYP functional are fairly good (even better than the popular B3LYP method).

Dimethylsilyl bis(amidinate)actinide complexes: synthesis and reactivity towards oxygen containing substrates

Ligand1reacts with ThCl₄and UCl₄yielding complexes2and4, respectively. Complex3is obtained from complex2displaying extremely short Th–OH bond distances.

Uranyl-oxo coordination directed by non-covalent interactions

Directed coordination of weakly Lewis acidic K⁺ ions to weakly Lewis basic uranyl oxo ligands is accomplished through non-covalent cation–π and cation–F interactions for the first time.

Oxo-group-14-element bond formation in binuclear uranium(V) Pacman complexes

Simple and versatile routes to the functionalization of uranyl-derived U(V)-oxo groups are presented. The oxo-lithiated, binuclear uranium(V)-oxo complexes [{(py)3LiOUO}2(L)] and [{(py)3LiOUO}(OUOSiMe3)(L)] were prepared by the direct combination of the uranyl(VI) silylamide "ate" complex [Li(py)2][(OUO)(N")3] (N" = N(SiMe3)2) with the polypyrrolic macrocycle H4L or the mononuclear uranyl (VI) Pacman complex [UO2(py)(H2L)], respectively. These oxo-metalated complexes display distinct U-O single and multiple bonding patterns and an axial/equatorial arrangement of oxo ligands. Their ready availability allows the direct functionalization of the uranyl oxo group leading to the binuclear uranium(V) oxo-stannylated complexes [{(R3Sn)OUO}2(L)] (R = nBu, Ph), which represent rare examples of mixed uranium/tin complexes. Also, uranium-oxo-group exchange occurred in reactions with [TiCl(OiPr)3] to form U-O-C bonds [{(py)3LiOUO}(OUOiPr)(L)] and [(iPrOUO)2(L)]. Overall, these represent the first family of uranium(V) complexes that are oxo-functionalised by Group 14 elements.

Oxo-functionalization and reduction of the uranyl ion through lanthanide-element bond homolysis: synthetic, structural, and bonding analysis of a series of singly reduced uranyl-rare earth 5f1-4f(n) complexes

The heterobimetallic complexes [{UO2Ln(py)2(L)}2], combining a singly reduced uranyl cation and a rare-earth trication in a binucleating polypyrrole Schiff-base macrocycle (Pacman) and bridged through a uranyl oxo-group, have been prepared for Ln = Sc, Y, Ce, Sm, Eu, Gd, Dy, Er, Yb, and Lu. These compounds are formed by the single-electron reduction of the Pacman uranyl complex [UO2(py)(H2L)] by the rare-earth complexes Ln(III)(A)3 (A = N(SiMe3)2, OC6H3Bu(t)2-2,6) via homolysis of a Ln-A bond. The complexes are dimeric through mutual uranyl exo-oxo coordination but can be cleaved to form the trimetallic, monouranyl "ate" complexes [(py)3LiOUO(μ-X)Ln(py)(L)] by the addition of lithium halides. X-ray crystallographic structural characterization of many examples reveals very similar features for monomeric and dimeric series, the dimers containing an asymmetric U2O2 diamond core with shorter uranyl U═O distances than in the monomeric complexes. The synthesis by Ln(III)-A homolysis allows [5f(1)-4f(n)]2 and Li[5f(1)-4f(n)] complexes with oxo-bridged metal cations to be made for all possible 4f(n) configurations. Variable-temperature SQUID magnetometry and IR, NIR, and EPR spectroscopies on the complexes are utilized to provide a basis for the better understanding of the electronic structure of f-block complexes and their f-electron exchange interactions. Furthermore, the structures, calculated by restricted-core or all-electron methods, are compared along with the proposed mechanism of formation of the complexes. A strong antiferromagnetic coupling between the metal centers, mediated by the oxo groups, exists in the U(V)Sm(III) monomer, whereas the dimeric U(V)Dy(III) complex was found to show magnetic bistability at 3 K, a property required for the development of single-molecule magnets.

Controlled deprotection and reorganization of uranyl oxo groups in a binuclear macrocyclic environment

Switching on uranium(V) reactivity: The silylated uranium(V) dioxo complex [(Me(3)SiOUO)(2)(L)(2)] (A) is inert to oxidation, but after two-electron reduction to [(Me(3)SiOUO)(2)(L)](2-) (1), it can be desilylated to form [OU(μ-O)(2)UO(L)(2)](2-) (2) with reinstated uranyl character. Removal of the silyl group uncovers new redox and oxo rearrangement chemistry for uranium, thus reforming the uranyl motif and involving the U(VI/V) couple in dioxygen reduction.

Co-linear, double-uranyl coordination by an expanded Schiff-base polypyrrole macrocycle

Expansion of a Schiff-base polypyrrolic macrocycle allows the formation of a binuclear uranyl complex with co-linear uranyl ions and a very short oxo-oxo distance.