CYFRA 21-1 is a prognostic determinant in non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a meta-analysis in 2063 patients

Plasma nucleosome levels might predict response to therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Recent progress in the field of anticancer drug discovery has created many options for improving the survival of patients with cancer. However, more effective diagnostic tools indicating early therapeutic efficacy or disease progression are still needed to improve the management of patients with inoperable cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Plasma nucleosome levels were quantified in 134 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer before the first cycle of chemotherapy. It was also evaluated before the second and third cycles of chemotherapy in 42 patients receiving first-line chemotherapy. Nucleosomes were correlated with response to therapy as assessed by computed tomography after the third therapy cycle.

RESULTS

Patients who went into remission had significantly lower nucleosome levels before therapy cycles 2 and 3 than patients with no change or progression. High levels and insufficient decreases in nucleosome levels during the course of chemotherapy indicated poor outcome. Nucleosome levels before the second cycle detected poor response to therapy with a sensitivity and specificity of 69.2% and 75%, respectively (area under the receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve, 0.816). Early prediction of disease progression was achieved with a sensitivity and specificity of 85.7% and 92.9%, respectively, for nucleosome levels before cycle 2 (area under the ROC curve, 0.930).

CONCLUSION

The monitoring of plasma nucleosome levels during the course of first-line chemotherapy could identify patients who are likely to have insufficient response to therapy and disease progression at an early stage. This might help in individualizing treatment and could lead to better management of advanced-stage lung cancer.

Establishment of a multi-analyte serum biomarker panel to identify lymph node metastases in non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the presence of locoregional lymph node metastases remains the most important prognostic factor and significantly guides treatment regimens. Unfortunately, currently-available noninvasive staging modalities have limited accuracy. The objective of this study was to create a multianalyte blood test capable of discriminating a patient's true (pathologic) nodal status preoperatively.

METHODS

Pretreatment serum specimens collected from 107 NSCLC patients with localized disease were screened with 47 biomarkers implicated in disease presence or progression. Multivariate statistical algorithms were then used to identify the optimal combination of biomarkers for accurately discerning each patient's nodal status.

RESULTS

We identified 15 candidate biomarkers that met our criteria for statistical relevance in discerning a patient's preoperative nodal status. A 'random forest' classification algorithm was used with these parameters to define a 6-analyte panel, consisting of macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha, carcinoembryonic antigen, stem cell factor, tumor necrosis factor-receptor I, interferon-gamma, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha, that was the optimum combination of biomarkers for identifying a patient's pathologic nodal status. A Classification and Regression Tree analysis was then created with this panel that was capable of correctly classifying 88% of the patients tested, relative to the pathologic assessments. This value is in contrast to our observed 85% classification rate using conventional clinical methods.

CONCLUSIONS

This study establishes a serum biomarker panel with efficacy in discerning preoperative nodal status. With further validation, this blood test may be useful for assessing nodal status (including occult disease) in NSCLC patients facing tumor resection therapy.

Nucleosomes, ProGRP, NSE, CYFRA 21-1, and CEA in monitoring first-line chemotherapy of small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Besides new therapeutic drugs, effective diagnostic tools indicating early the efficacy of therapy are required to improve the individual management of patients with nonoperable cancer diseases.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In prospectively collected sera of 128 patients with newly diagnosed small cell lung cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy, the courses of nucleosomes, progastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), cytokeratin-19 fragments (CYFRA 21-1), and carcinoembryonic antigen were investigated and correlated with therapy response objectified by computed tomography before start of the third treatment course.

RESULTS

In univariate analyses, high levels and insufficient decreases of nucleosomes, ProGRP, NSE, and CYFRA 21-1 during the first and second cycles of therapy correlated with poor outcome. Insufficient response to therapy was most efficiently indicated by the baseline values of nucleosomes, ProGRP, and CYFRA 21-1 before the second therapy cycle reaching areas under the curve (AUC) of 81.8%, 71.3%, and 74.9% in receiver operating characteristic curves, respectively. Combinations of nucleosomes with ProGRP (AUC 84.1%), CYFRA 21-1 (AUC 82.5%), and NSE (AUC 83.6%) further improved the diagnostic power in the high specificity range and yielded sensitivities of 47.1%, 35.3%, and 35.3% at 95% specificity, respectively. In multivariate analyses, including clinical and biochemical variables, only performance score and nucleosomes before cycle 2 were found to independently indicate therapy response.

CONCLUSIONS

Biochemical markers specifically identified patients with insufficient therapy response at the early treatment phase and showed to be valuable for diseases management of small cell lung cancer.

Nucleosomes and CYFRA 21-1 indicate tumor response after one cycle of chemotherapy in recurrent non-small cell lung cancer

The increasing panel of systemic therapies enables the individual management of cancer patients, even in advanced stages. However, diagnostic tools indicating early the efficacy of therapy are still needed. In prospectively collected sera of 161 patients with recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving second-line chemotherapy, the courses of nucleosomes, cytokeratin-19 fragments (CYFRA 21-1), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), and progastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP) were investigated and correlated with therapy response. At high specificity for detection of progressive disease, most sensitive biomarkers were identified and included in a combination model. High levels and insufficient decreases of nucleosomes and CYFRA 21-1 during the first cycle of therapy indicated poor outcome. Combination of nucleosome concentrations at day 8 and CYFRA 21-1 before start of the second cycle enabled the early detection of progressive disease with a sensitivity of 34.4% at 95% specificity (AUC 0.79) prior to imaging techniques. When cutoffs were fixed at the 90th percentile of responding patients, the combination model achieved sensitivities of 19% at 100% specificity and of 52% at 88% specificity. Thus, nucleosomes and CYFRA 21-1 showed to be valuable for the individual management of patients with recurrent NSCLC.

A follow-up report on a new method of segmental resection for small-sized early lung cancer

We previously reported a new method of segmentectomy, pulmonary artery-guided segmentectomy as a surgical alternative for small-sized early lung cancer with favorable results, but the follow-up time was too short for definitive conclusion. To examine the efficacy of the segmentectomy, and to determine the appropriate surgical procedure for early lung cancer, we conducted a retrospective follow-up study, and examined the influences of tumor size and preoperative serum tumor marker levels on the prognosis. We reviewed the records of 91 patients who underwent the segmentectomy for pathological T1N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer from 1993 to 2002. In 85 patients, carcinoembryonic antigen, squamous cell carcinoma-related antigen, and a fragment of cytokeratin were measured preoperatively. The overall 5-year survival rate was 83%. Indication (intentional, n=47; compromised, n=44) and tumor size (20mm or less, n=68; 21 to 30 mm, n=23) had no significant impact on survival. The 5-year survival rate for 49 patients with normal tumor marker levels was 93%, and significantly higher than 36 patients with at least one elevated tumor marker level (68%, p<0.01). Median follow-up time of 72.0 months revealed 11 locoregional recurrences. The incidence of locoregional recurrence was significantly higher in the patients with tumors of 21-30 mm, and elevated tumor marker (p<0.01). The follow-up study demonstrated that the segmentectomy could be an acceptable surgical treatment for early lung cancer patients with tumors of 20mm or smaller and normal tumor marker levels.

Usefulness of monitoring the circulating Krebs von den Lungen-6 levels to predict the clinical outcome of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer treated with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) is a high molecular weight glycoprotein classified in the category of human MUC1 mucin. KL-6 has been reported to serve as a sensitive marker for interstitial pneumonia; however, recent studies have suggested that it can also be used as a tumor marker as its origin shows. To further elucidate the clinicopathological significance of circulating KL-6 in lung cancer, we monitored the circulating KL-6 levels in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and analyzed the association between these levels and the clinical outcome of EGFR-TKI treatment. The pretreatment levels of circulating KL-6 were found to be significantly higher in progressive disease (PD) patients than disease-controlled (partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD)) patients. Multivariate analyses revealed the circulating KL-6 level to be an independent prognostic factor for overall survival as well as progression-free survival. In addition to these observations, we found that changes in circulating KL-6 levels at 2 weeks after the start of EGFR-TKI treatment from the baseline could quite precisely discriminate PD cases from PR or SD patients and the clinical outcome of EGFR-TKI in NSCLC patients. These results indicate that the monitoring of circulating KL-6 levels in NSCLC patients is effective for both selecting patients to be treated with EGFR-TKI and predicting the clinical outcome of EGFR-TKI. In addition, the findings suggest that the circulating KL-6 level could be used as a clinically relevant biomarker in patients with NSCLC, particularly those who are candidates for EGFR-TKI treatment.

Cytokeratin fragments in the serum: their utility for the management of oral cancer

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the sixth most common malignancy and is a major cause of cancer morbidity and mortality worldwide. Oral cancer is the most predominant malignancy in the Indian subcontinent due to the widespread habits of chewing tobacco and related products. Patients with oral tumours have a high risk of early locoregional relapse. Early detection of disease progression remains a challenging task mainly due to the lack of adequate early prognostic markers. CEA, SCC Ag, CA-125, serum cytokeratin (CK) fragments, Cyfra 21-1 (CK 19), TPS (CK 18), TPA (CK 8, 18, and 19) etc. are being used as serum markers for the prediction of prognosis of various malignancies. This review presents the available literature on serum CK markers in different malignancies evaluates their utility in the management of oral cancer, and identifies the lacunae which need to be addressed to develop sensitive and specific assays for early detection of recurrence, prognosis, and treatment monitoring.

Prognostic role of serum cytokeratin 19 fragments in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: association of marker changes after two chemotherapy cycles with different measures of clinical response and survival

Prognostic implication of serum cytokeratin 19 fragments (CYFRA 21-1) was explored in 60 advanced NSCLC patients, whereas in 45 patients assessable for serological response a ⩾35% CYFRA 21-1 decline after two chemotherapy cycles was strongly associated with non-progression (NP), defined as a sum of objective response (OR)+stable disease (P<0.0001) and survival (P=0.0002). Association of OR with survival was not significant. In multivariate survival analysis, ⩾35% marker decline and radiological NP status were found as major determinants of prolonged survival with RR: 0.37 (P=0.01) and 0.63 (P=0.01), respectively. In advanced NSCLC patients, NP reflects therapeutic efficacy better than traditional OR. CYFRA 21-1 ⩾35% decline seems to be a reliable surrogate marker of treatment efficacy in terms of survival.

Serum cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21-1) as a prognostic factor in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

A high serum cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21-1) concentration in patients with various cancers is associated with poor prognosis. This study aimed to establish the clinical significance of preoperative serum CYFRA21-1 in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

CYFRA21-1, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 concentrations were measured in sera from 71 patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The prognostic significance of serum CYFRA21-1 levels was assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Analysis of the areas under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves clearly showed better discrimination between intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and benign liver diseases for CYFRA 21-1 than for CEA or CA 19-9. Based on the maximization of the Youden's index, the optimal cut-off value was 2.7 ng ml(-1) for CYFRA 21-1 (sensitivity, 74.7%; specificity, 92.2%). The serum CYFRA21-1 concentration was related to tumor stage, since the CYFRA21-1 concentrations varied according to tumor size, vascular invasion, and number of tumors. The 3-year recurrence-free survival rates for patients with high and low concentrations of CYFRA21-1 were 25.0% and 76.2%, respectively (log-rank test, p < 0.01). The 3-year overall survival rates for patients with high and low concentrations of CYFRA21-1 were 39.4% and 63.6%, respectively (p = 0.01). On multivariate analysis, a high concentration of CYFRA21-1, nodal metastases, and a microscopic resection margin involvement were independent prognostic factors associated with both tumor recurrence and postoperative death.

CONCLUSIONS

A high serum CYFRA21-1 concentration is associated with tumor progression and poor postoperative outcomes in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Potentially useful biomarkers for the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of lung cancer

Lung cancer ranks top in both incidence and mortality in most part of the world. Scientists strive to explore biomarkers and their possible role in the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of lung cancer. The ultimate goal is to discover biomarkers that can be tested in clinical trials and finally applied to patient care. Highly elevated concentrations of cytokeratin 19 fragment, tissue polypeptide antigen and squamous cell carcinoma antigen in non-small cell lung cancer particularly for squamous cell carcinoma, carcinoembryonic antigen and cancer antigen 125 in adenocarcinoma or non-small cell lung cancer, as well as progastrin-releasing peptide and neuron specific enolase in small cell lung cancer are suggestive biomarkers for the malignancy. Despite extensive studies, most results still remain controversial. Even with the report of high percent sensitivity and specificity, validation by clinical trials in large cohorts of patients is necessary before the cancer-related phenotypes can be translated into the clinic as reliable biomarkers. Nevertheless, identifications of biomarkers are leading to more understanding of the molecular pathways involved in lung cancer. It is hoped that understanding the connections between cellular pathways will help to reduce the suffering and loss of life caused by the lethal disease. This article summarizes the pre-clinical and translational researches against lung cancer in relation to biomarker discovery and validation. It is intended for policy makers, researchers, clinicians and other health professionals, offering a variety of useful biomarkers and updated data of clinical trials for lung cancer.

Predicting Risk of Radiation-Induced Lung Injury

Radiation-induced lung injury (RILI) is the most common, dose-limiting complication of thoracic radio- and radiochemotherapy. Unfortunately, predicting which patients will suffer from this complication is extremely difficult. Ideally, individual phenotype- and genotype-based risk profiles should be able to identify patients who are resistant to RILI and who could benefit from dose escalation in chemoradiotherapy. This could result in better local control and overall survival. We review the risk predictors that are currently in clinical use--dosimetric parameters of radiotherapy such as normal tissue complication probability, mean lung dose, V20 and V30--as well as biomarkers that might individualize risk profiles. These biomarkers comprise a variety of proinflammatory and profibrotic cytokines and molecules including transforming growth factor beta1 that are implicated in development and persistence of RILI. Dosimetric parameters of radiotherapy show a low negative predictive value of 60% to 80%. Depending on the studied molecule, negative predictive value of biomarkers is approximately 50%. The predictive power of biomarkers might be increased if they are coupled with radiogenomics, e.g., genotyping analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms in transforming growth factor beta1, transforming growth factor beta1 pathway genes, and other cytokines. Genetic variability and the complexity of RILI and its underlying molecular mechanisms make identification of biological risk predictors challenging. Further investigations are needed to develop more effective risk predictors of RILI.

Prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen and CYFRA21-1 in patients with pathological stage I non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the prognostic value of serum tumor markers (carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CYFRA21-1) in patients with pathologic (p-) stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing complete resection.

METHODS

Two hundred and seventy-five patients (163 males, 112 females, mean age 67.1 years) with p-stage I NSCLC who underwent complete resection at our institution between April 1999 and October 2004 were examined. Patients who had received preoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy were excluded, as were patients who had multiple malignancies including multiple lung cancer. The serum levels of tumor markers were measured using commercially available immunoassays within 1 month before surgical resection. Serum levels of CEA and CYFRA21-1 higher than 5.0 and 2.8 ng/ml, respectively, were considered as positive according to the manufacture's instructions.

RESULTS

The histological classification was adenocarcinoma in 193 patients, squamous cell carcinoma in 71, large cell carcinoma in 5, and other histological type in 6. One hundred and fifty-seven patients had T1 disease and 118 patients had T2 disease. The positive ratio of CEA and CYFRA21-1 was 25.7% and 13.7%, respectively, and in relation to histological type was 27.8% and 7.8% in adenocarcinoma, and 20.6% and 28.4% in squamous cell carcinoma. The overall 5-year survival rate was 79.3%. With a median follow-up of 35.5 month for surviving patients, those with initial CYFRA21-1 serum levels higher than 2.8 ng/ml had a significantly worse prognosis (p=0.0041). Patients with an elevated preoperative CEA level exceeding 5.0 ng/ml had a shorter disease-free survival period (p=0.0003). In patients with adenocarcinoma, a CEA level above 5.0 ng/ml was associated with shorter survival and early recurrence, whereas CYFRA21-1 showed no such association. In patients with squamous cell carcinoma, elevated preoperative CEA was not related to survival and recurrence. In these patients, preoperative CYFRA21-1 level exceeding 2.8 ng/ml was associated with a poorer outcome, whereas preoperative CYFRA21-1 level was not associated with cancer recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The patients with p-stage I adenocarcinoma whose preoperative CEA level was high might be considered as good candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy. The prognostic value of CYFRA21-1 could not be confirmed for stage I NSCLC, and preoperative CYFRA21-1 level was not useful in selecting the candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy.

Serum Sialyl Lewis x and cytokeratin 19 fragment as predictive factors for recurrence in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer

This study aimed to establish the clinical significance of preoperative serum cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21-1) and Sialyl Lewis(x) (SLX) in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The study involved 137 patients (87 male, 50 female; median age 69 years) with completely resected stage I NSCLC. SLX, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC), and CYFRA21-1 were examined. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine prognostic cut-off values. Among the 137 patients, we identified 30 with recurrence within 3 years. The 5-year survival rates in patients with (n=30) and without (n=107) recurrence were 14% and 81%, respectively. The serum concentrations of SLX, CEA, and CYFRA21-1 in the recurrence group were significantly higher than those in the non-recurrence group. The areas under the ROC curve (AUC) were 0.72, 0.65, 0.53, and 0.64 for SLX, CEA, SCC, and CYFRA21-1, respectively. The prognostic cut-off values were 36U/ml, 7.8ng/ml, 1.5ng/ml, and 3.2ng/ml for SLX, CEA, SCC, and CYFRA21-1, respectively. A log-rank test revealed that age, performance status, T factor, lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion, SLX, CEA, SCC, and CYFRA21-1 were all significantly associated with survival. By multivariate analysis, age, performance status, lymphatic invasion, SLX (risk ratio, 4.11) and CYFRA21-1 (risk ratio, 3.47) were independent prognostic factors. For patients positive for both CYFRA21-1 and SLX, the relative risk was 5.32 compared with patients who were negative for both markers. The 5-year survival rates were 80% in the group negative for both markers (n=86); 52% in the group positive for one of the markers (n=43); and 13% for the group positive for both markers (n=8) (p<0.001). We concluded that serum SLX and CYFRA21-1 were prognostic markers for stage I NSCLC. Their combination should contribute to the classification of stage I NSCLC patients. There is a need to consider adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies to improve prognosis in patients positive for both tumor markers.

Role of tumor markers in patients with solid cancers: A critical review

The measurement of tumor markers is currently one of the most rapidly growing areas in laboratory medicine. Lack of sensitivity and specificity preclude the use of most existing markers for the early detection of malignancy. For patients with diagnosed malignancy, however, markers are potentially useful in determining prognosis, predicting therapeutic response, maintaining surveillance following curative surgery and monitoring therapy in advanced disease. Clinically useful markers include CEA in the surveillance of patients with diagnosed colorectal cancer, AFP and HCG in the management of patients with non-seminomatous germ cell tumors, HCG in the management of patients with trophoblastic disease, CA 125 for monitoring therapy in patients with ovarian cancer, estrogen receptors for predicting response to hormone therapy in breast cancer and HER-2 for the identification of women with breast cancer likely to respond to trastuzumab (Herceptin). Although widely used, the impact of PSA screening in reducing mortality from prostate cancer remains to be shown.

Decline in serum carcinoembryonic antigen and cytokeratin 19 fragment during chemotherapy predicts objective response and survival in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The authors assessed the predictive and prognostic role of decline in the serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1) during chemotherapy in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Changes in serum levels of CEA and CYFRA 21-1 during first-line, conventional chemotherapy were studied prospectively with an immunometric assay at baseline and every 2 courses in 117 patients with advanced NSCLC. Data were correlated with radiologic objective response (OR) and survival.

RESULTS

One hundred seven patients were evaluable for radiologic and serologic response assessment after 2 chemotherapy courses. The radiologic OR rate was 44% overall. The CEA and CYFRA 21-1 responses (> or =20% reduction over baseline level; assessed after the second course of chemotherapy) were 38% and 61%, respectively. Statistically significant correlations were observed between CEA and CYFRA 21-1 responses and OR (P = .01 and P = .004, respectively). The median survival from response assessment (landmark analysis) was 9 months. In a univariate analysis, disease stage, performance status, baseline lactate dehydrogenase level (LDH), OR, CEA response, and CYFRA 21-1 response were correlated significantly with survival. In particular, the median survival was 13 months for patients who had a CEA response and 11 months for patients who had a CYFRA 21-1 response compared with 8 months and 6 months for patients who did not respond, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, performance status (P = .005), baseline LDH level (P = .02), CEA response (P = .03) and CYFRA 21-1 response (P = .01) were confirmed as independent prognostic factors for survival.

CONCLUSIONS

CEA and CYFRA 21-1 responses appeared to be reliable surrogate markers of chemotherapy efficacy in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Early and specific prediction of the therapeutic efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer patients by nucleosomal DNA and cytokeratin-19 fragments

Facing an era of promising new antitumor therapies, predictors of therapy response are needed for the individual management of treatment. In sera collected prospectively from 311 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy, changes in nucleosomal DNA fragments, cytokeratin-19 fragments (CYFRA 21-1), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), and progastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP) were investigated and correlated with therapy response. In univariate analysis, high levels, slower and incomplete decline in nucleosomal DNA, CYFRA 21-1, and CEA predicted poor outcome. DNA concentrations at day 8 of the first therapeutic cycle and CYFRA 21-1 before start of the second cycle were identified as best predictive variables. In multivariate analysis, they predicted progression with a specificity of 100% in 29% of the cases earlier than imaging techniques. Thus, nucleosomal DNA and CYFRA 21-1 specifically identify a subgroup of patients with insufficient therapy response at the early treatment phase and showed to be valuable for disease management.

Clinical Value of Serum Cytokeratin 19 Fragment and Sialyl-Lewis X in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to establish the clinical significance of preoperative serum cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21-1) and sialyl-Lewis x (SLex) as prognostic markers.

METHODS

The study involved 272 patients (181 male, 91 female; median age 69 years; range, 32 to 92) with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent pulmonary resection with mediastinal lymph node dissection. Tumor markers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC), CYFRA21-1, and SLex were examined.

RESULTS

A log-rank test revealed that age, gender, performance status, CEA, SCC, CYFRA21-1, and SLex were associated with the survival rate. By multivariate analysis, age, gender, performance status, CYFRA21-1 (risk ratio, 2.42) and SLex (risk ratio, 6.18) were independent prognostic factors. For patients positive for both markers, the relative risk was 6.10 compared with patients negative for both markers. The patients were divided into three groups: negative for both CYFRA21-1 and SLex (n = 97); positive for either marker (n = 136); and positive for both markers (n = 39). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were the following: 98%, 82%, and 75% in the first group; 90%, 63%, and 49% in the second group; and 62%, 31%, and 25% in the third group (p < 0.001). Sixty-four percent of patients positive for both markers were histologic stage III/IV, and 68% of patients negative for both markers were stage I.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum CYFRA21-1 and SLex were prognostic markers for NSCLC. Their combination should contribute to the classification of NSCLC patients. Preoperative staging should be carefully performed in patients positive for both tumor markers.

Lung Cancer - Clinical Implications

Karcinom pluća je najčešće maligno oboljenje kod muškog pola, a u žena na drugom mestu (nakon raka dojke). Klinička podela na nemikrocelularni (NSCLC) i mikrocelularni (SCLC) odražava različito biološko ponašanje i sledstveno razlike u terapijskom pristupu. Od velike važnosti bi bilo postojanje biomarkera koji bi omogućili razlikovanje ova dva tipa karcinoma pluća, naročito u slučajeva kada nije izvodljiva invazivna dijagnostika kao i u praćenju efekata terapije i ranom otkrivanju relapsa bolesti. Rezultati velikih retrospektivnih ili prospektivnih studija ukazuju na izvesnu vrednost specifičnih markera ili kombinacija ovih markera za dijagnostičke i diferencijalno dijagnostičke svrhe. Merenje četiri serum tumor markera, CYFRA 21-1, CEA, NSE i ProGRP ima opravdanja da bi se identifikovao vodeći marker i na taj način predpostavio verovatni histološki tip tumora. Serijska određivanja odgovarajućeg tumor markera može takođe biti od pomoći da se utvrdi kompletnost uklanjanja tumora i utvrdi relaps bolesti u okultnom kliničkom stadijumu.

Tumor markers in detection of lung cancer

The expression of biomarkers by lung cancers is useful in the diagnosis and clinical management of patients with lung cancer. Biomarkers provide insight into histogenesis, interrelationships, and biological behavior of lung tumors. This chapter presents data on lung cancer detection, involving some of the most studied and interesting lung cancer biomarkers to date-CYFRA 21-1, NSE, ProGRP, SCC, CEA, Tumor M2-PK, as well as markers in clinical application such as CRP, LDH, tumor-suppressor genes and oncogenes, CA125, CgA, NCAM, and TPA. Biomarker profiles in combination with fuzzy logic techniques have also been addressed. Serum markers used alone or in combination with other indices might play an important role in monitoring response to therapy in early detection of tumor reactivation in new treatment strategies as well as in secondary prevention.

Clinical significance of serum cytokeratin-19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1) in hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

CYFRA 21-1, a soluble fragment of cytokeratin 19, is increased in serum in some patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, but the clinical significance of this increase is still unknown.

METHODS

Serum concentrations of CYFRA 21-1 were measured in 240 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma prior to hepatic resection. The relationships between serum CYFRA 21-1 concentrations and clinicopathologic features were analyzed.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of CYFRA 21-1 as a test for hepatocellular carcinoma was 18.8%. Serum CYFRA 21-1 was significantly higher in patients with portal vein tumor thrombus, and serum CYFRA 21-1 increased with the progression of portal vein tumor thrombus. Tumor size was related to serum CYFRA 21-1, but there were no significant correlations between serum CYFRA 21-1 concentrations and tumor differentiation or number of tumors. Although patients with stage IV tumor had significantly higher CYFRA 21-1 concentrations than those with stages I, II, and III, CYFRA 21-1 was not associated with postoperative prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Although high concentrations of CYFRA 21-1 were often detected in patients with a tumor diameter greater than 5 cm or tumor thrombus in the major portal vein, CYFRA 21-1 is not a useful diagnostic tool for hepatocellular carcinoma because of its low sensitivity.

A critical appraisal of prognostic and predictive factors for common lung cancers

The outlook for patients with lung cancer remains poor despite advances in the understanding of the pathology and biology of this disease. To optimize treatment protocols prognostic data are essential. The current era with molecular research on mRNA expression analysis and proteomics will lead to a plethora of new molecular markers, which are likely to be correlated, at least in part, with each other and with disease activity, progression and survival. However, although the number of prognostic factors analysed in published systematic reviews on lung cancer is large, the scope of these factors in individual studies is often narrow. In daily practice prognostic factors other than general TNM staging are not implemented. To assess the efficacy of new prognostic factors for the management of individual patients with non-small cell lung cancer, studies with clinically relevant modelling are required. In this review arguments are provided to use a model combining radiological and histopathological growth rate, histopathological diagnosis and molecular characteristics as markers for metastatic capacity, tumour volume doubling time and expected response to targeted therapy. This may reveal time-related predictive information useful for treatment guidance of the individual patient.

High serum concentrations of Sialyl Lewisx predict multilevel N2 disease in non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical significance of serum Sialyl Lewisx (SLX) concentrations as a predictor of N2 disease in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

The study included 272 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer who underwent pulmonary resection in our institution between January 1998 and December 2003. Of 272 patients, the serum concentrations of SLX were measured by using a commercially available radioimmunoassay kit.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival rates of patients with concentrations of SLX > 38 U/mL and those with lower concentrations were 32% and 69%, respectively (P < .0001). The median serum concentration of SLX in patients with multilevel N2 or N3, single-level N2, and N0/1 disease were 44, 30, and 27 U/mL, respectively. The concentrations of serum SLX in patients with multilevel N2 disease were significantly higher than those in patients with single-level N2 or those with N0/1 disease (Mann-Whitney U-test; P < .0001). Although the sensitivity of SLX for identifying patients with non-small-cell lung cancer was only 24% in all patients, the sensitivity of SLX increased as the N-factor increased; the sensitivity of N0/1 disease was 15%, that of single-level N2 disease was 22%, and that of multilevel N2 or N3 disease was 71%.

CONCLUSIONS

High serum concentrations of SLX predicted multilevel N2 disease and the associated poor outcome. Although the sensitivity of serum SLX is not acceptable for use as a screening tumor marker, we suggest that the serum concentration of SLX is useful as a staging marker to determine the strategy of treatment.

Conflict between guideline methodologic quality and recommendation validity: a potential problem for practitioners

BACKGROUND

It is not clear if good methodologic quality in current practice guidelines necessarily leads to more valid recommendations, i.e., those that are supported with consistent research evidence or, when evidence is conflicting or lacking, with sufficient consensus among the guideline development team. To help clarify this issue, we assessed whether there is a link between methodologic quality and recommendation validity in practice guidelines for the use of laboratory tests in the management of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of data on laboratory tests in NSCLC published in English or in French within the last 10 years and retrieved 11 practice guidelines for the use of these tests. The guidelines were critically appraised and scored for methodologic quality and recommendation validity based on the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) criteria and on the systematic review.

RESULTS

Overall, these 11 guidelines had considerable shortcomings in methodologic quality and, to a lesser extent, in recommendation validity. Practice guidelines with the best methodologic quality were not necessarily the most valid in their recommendations, and conversely.

CONCLUSIONS

Poor methodologic quality and lack of recommendation validity in laboratory medicine call for methodologic standards of guideline development and for international collaboration of guideline development agencies. We advise readers of guidelines to critically evaluate the methods used as well as the content of the recommendations before adopting them for use in practice.

Nuclear galectin-3 expression is an independent predictive factor of recurrence for adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the lung

The tumor stage is the most powerful prognostic tool for predicting the survival rates of lung carcinoma patients. However, prognosis of individual patients is difficult in part because of the marked clinical heterogeneity among such patients. Galectins are involved in cell growth, apoptosis and cell migration features, and their diagnostic and prognostic values have already been demonstrated in various types of cancers. In the present paper we analyze the potential prognostic value of immunohistochemical galectin-3 expression in lung adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas. In all, 165 squamous cell carcinomas and 121 adenocarcinomas were immunostained for galectin-3. In each case the immunohistochemical analyses consisted of an evaluation of the percentage of tumor cells stained and the intensity of staining. An IP score (ie Intensity x Percentage) was thus determined for each lung carcinoma. A large majority of cases displayed galectin-3 expression. While the cytoplasmic staining in the squamous cell carcinomas was focal and moderately intense, the staining in the adenocarcinomas was diffuse and intense. The IP scores were significantly (P=0.0001) higher in the adenocarcinomas than in the squamous cell carcinomas. The difference in nuclear expression profiles between the two cancer types was statistically significant (P=0.0005). Cox multivariate analysis carried out on the patients' genders, the TNM classification and the galectin-3-related variables showed that of the galectin-3-related variables, only the nuclear location of galectin-3 was identified as a prognostic indicator of recurrence independent of the clinicopathological features characterizing the patients (P=0.02). The prognostic contribution of this latter variable was enhanced when the patients with relapse-free follow-ups longer than 8 months were considered (P=0.005). Galectin-3 immunohistochemical expression differs between squamous cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas, but the nuclear expression of galectin-3 behaves as a significant prognostic predictor for all the cases as a group.

CYFRA 21-1 level predicts survival in non-small-cell lung cancer patients receiving gefitinib as third-line therapy

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) as gefitinib emerged as an accepted treatment in second- or third-line setting in NSCLC. However, clinical surrogate markers of EGFR-TKI activity in NSCLC patients remain to be identified and we studied the prognostic value of CYFRA 21-1 in this setting. Serum samples from 53 patients with NSCLC receiving gefitinib after failure of at least a platinum-containing regimen were prospectively collected from January 2002 to December 2003. Multivariate analysis demonstrated an independent negative impact on survival for a level of CYFRA 21-1 higher than 3.5 ng ml⁻¹ (HR=2.45, 95% CI 1.13–5.29; P=0.02). In conclusion, CYFRA 21-1 is a tool available to predict the survival of NSCLC patients receiving gefitinib as third-line therapy in an independent manner. In case of a CYFRA 21-1 level higher than 3.5 ng ml⁻¹, treatment with gefitinib needs further evaluation giving its relative poor effect on survival.

Real-time RT-PCR detection of CK19, CK7 and MUC1 mRNA for diagnosis of lymph node micrometastases in non small cell lung carcinoma

Metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) are the major prognostic factor in resected non small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). However, almost 50% of pN0 patients relapse, suggesting metastatic cells undetected by current staging procedures. A combination of markers [cytokeratins 19 and 7 (CK19, CK7) and mucin type 1 (MUC1) mRNAs] was therefore evaluated by real-time RT-PCR in order to detect occult cancer cells. Forty-three NSCLC tumor samples, 4 micrometastatic, 6 metastatic and 84 histologically negative mediastinal LNs from 19 patients with NSCLC were evaluated as well as blood mononuclear cells from 29 healthy volunteers and 17 benign LNs. When tested on cell lines, RT-PCR was particularly efficient for evaluation of CK19, CK7 and MUC1 mRNA expression. All tumor samples were positive for at least 1 marker and 74% of samples were positive for all 3 markers. CK7 and CK19 mRNA were not detected in benign LN and blood cells from healthy donors in contrast with MUC1 mRNA. Only CK7 and CK19 mRNA were therefore used for evaluation of mediastinal LNs: the 6 histologically metastatic and the 4 micrometastatic LNs were positive for at least one marker. Among the 84 histologically negative LNs, 6 (7%) were positive for at least one marker, potentially changing the stage of 2 out of 19 patients. In conclusion, in our feasibility study, parallel molecular detection of CK19 and CK7 mRNA can be considered a specific diagnostic tool for the assessment of microscopic lymphatic spread. Its prognostic impact remains to be evaluated in a prospective study.

The Prospect of Biologic Staging of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

The reductionistic approach to cancer research has led to an enormous amount of information and publications regarding the molecular biologic processes that take place in cancer tissue. However, the specific influence of this information on clinical practice has been limited. With the advent of new reductionistic tools like the transcriptomic and proteomic technologies, many would argue that further advances in the field of lung cancer research will be dominated by advances on the technical level. However, we anticipate that the most revolutionary advances will be those at a conceptual level. Medical science has always been reductionistic in essence, reducing and analyzing the composing elements of our complex biologic machinery, overlooking the fact that the interrelation among a set of simple determinants creates a new dimension of characteristics and functions. Problems emerging from a reductionistic approach are heterogeneity and variability. This review addresses the current conceptual problems in the field of lung cancer biology and provides a new conceptual model based on recent publications.