Determination of minimal residual disease in leukaemia patients

Clinical significance of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia after first relapse

Using flow cytometric techniques capable of detecting 0.01% leukemic cells, we prospectively studied minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) after first relapse. At the end of remission reinduction, 41 patients had a bone marrow sample adequate for MRD studies; 35 of these were in morphologic remission. Of the 35 patients, 19 (54%) had MRD >/=0.01%, a finding that was associated with subsequent leukemia relapse. The 2-year cumulative incidence of second leukemia relapse was 70.2+/-12.3% for the 19 MRD-positive patients and 27.9+/-12.4% for the 16 MRD-negative patients (P=0.008). Among patients with a first relapse off therapy, 2-year second relapse rates were 49.1+/-17.8% in the 12 MRD-positive and 0% in the 11 MRD-negative patients (P=0.014); among those who received only chemotherapy after first relapse, the 2-year second relapse rates were 81.5+/-14.4% (n=12) and 25.0+/-13.1% (n=13), respectively (P=0.004). Time of first relapse and MRD were the only two significant predictors of outcome in a multivariate analysis. We conclude that MRD assays should be used to guide the selection of postremission therapy in patients with ALL in first relapse.

Comparative analysis of flow cytometry and polymerase chain reaction for the detection of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Minimal residual disease (MRD) is an independent prognostic factor in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The most widely applied MRD assays in ALL are flow cytometric identification of leukemia immunophenotypes and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of antigen-receptor genes. We measured MRD by both assays in 227 patients with childhood B-lineage ALL. Of 1375 samples (736 bone marrow and 639 peripheral blood) examined, MRD was <0.01% in 1200, and > or =0.01% in 129 by both assays; MRD levels measured by the two methods correlated well. Of the remaining 46 samples, 28 had MRD > or =0.01% by flow cytometry but <0.01% by PCR. However, PCR (which had a consistent sensitivity of 0.001%) detected leukemic gene rearrangements in 26 of these 28 samples. Conversely, in 18 samples, MRD was > or =0.01% by PCR but <0.01% by flow cytometry. In nine of these samples, flow cytometry had a sensitivity of 0.001%, and detected aberrant immunophenotypes in eight samples. Therefore, the two most widely used methods for MRD detection in ALL yield concordant results in the vast majority of cases, although the estimated levels of MRD may vary in some. The use of the two methods in tandem ensures MRD monitoring in all patients.

Stability of leukemia-associated aberrant immunophenotypes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia between diagnosis and relapse: Comparison with cytomorphologic, cytogenetic, and molecular genetic findings

BACKGROUND

Multiparameter flow cytometry is increasingly used to monitor minimal residual disease in patients with acute myeloid leukemia to identify leukemic cells by leukemia-associated aberrant immunophenotypes (LAIPs). Changes in LAIPs during the course of the disease may be a limitation for this approach.

METHODS

We analyzed 49 patients at diagnosis and relapse by flow cytometry, cytomorphology, cytogenetics, and molecular genetics.

RESULTS

In 37 patients (76%), at least one LAIP detectable at diagnosis was present at relapse; in 12 patients (24%), none of the original LAIPs were present in at least 1% of bone marrow cells. Three groups were identified: no change in LAIPs, partial changes in LAIPs, and complete change in LAIPs. There were significant differences across these groups with regard to changes in cytomorphology (11%, 40%, and 58% of all cases, respectively; P = 0.007), cytogenetics (15%, 20%, and 25%; not significant), and molecular genetics (18%, 0, and 86%; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that, in a subset of patients with acute myeloid leukemia, the disease is biologically different at relapse; therefore, monitoring of minimal residual disease is difficult to accomplish. In most patients with acute myeloid leukemia, multiparameter flow cytometry may be used to monitor minimal residual disease.

Clinical significance of residual disease during treatment in childhood acute myeloid leukaemia

In children with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), morphological and karyotypic studies cannot precisely assess response to treatment, and less than one-third of patients have genetic markers for molecular studies of residual disease. We determined the usefulness of a four-colour flow cytometric strategy developed in our laboratory to study residual disease. We first compared the immunophenotypes of AML cells obtained from 54 children at diagnosis with those of cells from 59 normal or regenerating bone marrow samples. Forty-six of the 54 AML cases (85.2%) had immunophenotypes that allowed detection of 0.1-0.01% residual leukaemic cells. Of 230 bone marrow samples obtained from those 46 patients during and off treatment, 61 (26.5%) had >/= 0.1% AML cells by flow cytometry. We found that core binding factor-associated AML had a significantly better early treatment response. Mean (+/- standard error) 2-year survival estimate was 33.1 +/- 19.1% for patients with >/= 0.1% AML cells by flow cytometry after induction therapy, but 72.1 +/- 11.5% for those with < 0.1% AML cells (P = 0.022); overt recurrence of AML within the subsequent 6 months was significantly more likely in the former group. The assay described here holds promise for guiding the choice of post-remission treatment options in children with AML.