Outcomes of kidney transplantation from older living donors to older recipients

With respect to elderly patients: finding kidneys in the context of new allocation concepts

The elderly have benefited from increased access to renal transplantation in recent years. New allocation concepts would shift distribution of kidneys to younger recipients, making expanded criteria and living donor kidneys more relevant for seniors. Current issues impacting expanded criteria donor kidney availability and living donor transplant opportunities for the elderly are explored. It is hoped that the kidney donor profile index will improve risk assessment and utilization of marginal kidneys. The usefulness of procurement biopsy remains controversial. Dual kidney transplantation and machine perfusion appear to be effective mechanisms to increase organ availability. "Old-for-old" allocation systems, donation service area variation and regulatory and reimbursement issues highlight disparities and disincentives affecting expanded criteria donor organ utilization, and considerations for the way forward are discussed. Living donor transplantation, even with older donors, may provide the best option for elderly recipients, and careful expansion of the living donor pool appears appropriate. In light of new allocation concepts, it will be important to understand issues pertinent to seniors and develop effective strategies to maintain or improve their access to the benefits of transplantation.

Age and the associations of living donor and expanded criteria donor kidneys with kidney transplant outcomes

BACKGROUND

Recent studies show a survival advantage with kidney transplant in elderly patients compared with those on dialysis therapy.

STUDY DESIGN

In our present study, we examined and compared the association of expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidney and living kidney donation with the outcome of kidney transplant across different ages, including elderly recipients.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we identified 145,470 adult kidney transplant patients. Mortality and death-censored transplant failure risks were estimated by Cox proportional regression analyses during follow-up with a median of 3.9 years.

PREDICTORS

ECD kidney and living kidney donation and age compared with others.

OUTCOMES

Mortality and death-censored transplant failure risk.

RESULTS

Patients were aged 45 ± 16 years and included 40% women and 19% patients with diabetes. Compared with transplant recipients 55 to younger than 65 years, the fully adjusted death-censored transplant failure risk was higher in patients 75 years and older (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.09-1.56), 35 to younger than 55 years (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.08-1.17), and 18 to younger than 35 years (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.57-1.71). Compared with non-ECD kidneys, ECD kidneys were significant predictors of mortality in nonelderly patients (18-<35 years: HR, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.19-1.77]; 35-<55 years: HR, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.14-1.32]; and 55-<65 years: HR, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.15-1.38]) and patients 65 to younger than 70 years (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.05-1.36), but not in other groups of elderly patients (HRs of 1.12 [95% CI, 0.93-1.36] for 70-<75 years and 1.04 [95% CI, 0.74-1.47] for ≥75 years). Similar results were found for risk of transplant loss. Compared with deceased donor kidneys, a living donor kidney was associated with better survival in all age groups and lower transplant loss risk in patients younger than 70 years.

LIMITATIONS

Unmeasured confounders cannot be adjusted for.

CONCLUSIONS

For deceased donors, ECD kidneys are not associated with increased mortality or transplant failure in recipients older than 70 years. For all types of donors, the persistent association between living donor kidneys and lower all-cause mortality across all ages suggests that, if possible, elderly patients gain longevity from living donor kidney transplant.

Quality of life in kidney transplantation from marginal donors

OBJECTIVE

Enhancement of the subjective components, recognition of overall needs, and careful consideration of subjectively perceived quality of life among dialysis and/or transplanted patients appear to be key objectives to promote optimized adherence to treatment and active cooperation of the patient. This study explores the relationship between self-rated health among recipients of kidney transplantations from deceased marginal donors (age older than 55 years) in relation to gender, age, time on dialysis, years after transplantation, and donor age.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Posttransplant quality of life was assessed with the Complete Form Health Survey (SF-36) in 70 recipients of kidney transplantations from marginal deceased donors.

RESULTS

Donor age did not negatively influence health status perceived by the subjects. The vitality and mental health seemed to increase with greater donor ages, but the status of perceived health, vitality, social activities, and mental health were negatively influenced by the age of the transplant.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that good general health and social well-functioning can be achieved also among recipients of organs from older donors. Thus, age alone should not be a barrier to organ donation, providing that the organ function is normal and that specific disease is absent in the organ.

The elderly as recipients of living donor kidneys, how old is too old?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Transplantation of the elderly often invokes strong and sometimes passionate arguments both in support and in opposition. Age alone has not been an absolute contraindication to a life-sustaining organ transplant for several decades. A comprehensive evaluation of the risks associated with surgery and suppression of the immune system in this often comorbid population becomes the focus. Risk for the recipient, however, must continually be evaluated and frequently updated in the context of that for the donor.

RECENT FINDINGS

Following careful and critical evaluation, elderly patients appreciate the increase in life expectancy and improvements in quality of life as demonstrated in their younger counterparts. The outcome of recipients receiving kidneys from living donors has demonstrated superior graft and patient survival compared to deceased donors. Careful monitoring of medication levels for prevention of rejection while avoiding over immunosuppression and infection is critical to ensure such benefit.

SUMMARY

Transplantation of the elderly via living donation is not only justified but in the appropriately chosen patient, with informed consent of both donor and recipient, is ethically sound. The expectations of both parties must be clearly stated and donor safety must remain the top priority. Living donors must be fully cognizant of the potential risk both in patient and graft survival prior to making such a life-changing decision to donate.

Topics in transplantation medicine for general nephrologists

Before transplantation, the general nephrologist is the primary resource for potential kidney transplantation recipients. After transplantation, the general nephrologist is increasingly managing transplant medications and complications. We provide evidence-based management strategies for common clinical issues. Linking our approach with the data allows the clinician to explore each subject in greater depth to tailor care to individual patients.

Kidney transplantation in the elderly

There is an increase in the older incident end-stage renal disease population that is associated with an increasing prevalence of end-stage renal disease in the United States. This trend is paralleled by an increasing rate of kidney transplantation in the elderly. Although patient survival is lower in older versus younger kidney recipients, the elderly benefit from a reduction in mortality rate and improved quality of life with transplantation compared with dialysis. Immunologic, physiologic, and psychosocial factors influence transplant outcomes and should be recognized in the care of the elderly transplant patient. In this review, we discuss transplantation in the elderly patient, particularly the topics of access to transplantation, patient and graft survival, the impact of donor quality on transplant outcomes, immunology and immunosuppression of aging, and ethical considerations in the development of an equitable organ allocation scheme.

Pathology: donor biopsy evaluation at time of renal grafting

How can we improve the diagnostic value of donor kidney graft biopsies and the management of renal transplant recipients? A recent study developed a morphologic scoring system -- the Maryland Aggregate Pathology Index -- to help predict long-term renal graft survival from preimplantation donor organ biopsy findings.

Kidneys from deceased donors more than 75 years perform acceptably after transplantation

BACKGROUND

Organ shortage has resulted in an increased use of expanded criteria donors for transplantation, in particular kidneys from older donors. There is limited data on the impact of donor age more than 75 years on kidney transplant outcome.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center analysis on deceased donors more than 75 years and kidney transplant outcome in an old for old setting was performed. Histologic findings (global kidney score) in graft biopsies and deceased-donor scores were evaluated to observe if this information could be helpful in predicting outcome.

RESULTS

Evaluation of data from 54 single kidney transplantations from 29 donors more than 75 years (median 77.5, range 75.2-86.1) were assessed. Ninety-three percent of the donors died of intracranial bleeding, and 69% had a history of hypertension or cardiovascular event(s). Median recipient age was 70.1 (range 50.6-82.4). Fifty-two grafts (96%) had posttransplant function. Death censored graft survival at 1, 3, and 5 years were 87%, 83%, and 83%, respectively. Patient survival was 81%, 75%, and 59% at the same time points. At follow-up at median 23 months (range 6-144 months), thirty-five recipients were alive with a median serum creatinine of 163 micromol/ L (range 103-348). Global kidney score and deceased donor score did not predict graft outcome.

CONCLUSION

Kidney transplants from deceased donors more than 75 years perform acceptable as single transplants and should be considered for use in older recipients.

Deceased-donor renal transplantation in the geriatric population demonstrates equal graft survival compared with younger recipients

BACKGROUND

Renal transplantation (RTx) in the geriatric population (age >65 years) accounts for 14% of all RTx performed nationally in 2007.

METHODS

We reviewed 3297 RTx recipients from our database over a 15-year period to evaluate recipient and donor age, date of transplant and graft loss, cause of graft loss, and cold ischemic time in the geriatric population.

RESULTS

Since 1991, we have performed 468 living donor RTx (LDRTx) and deceased donor RTx (DDRTx) in patients more than 65 years: 280 (65-69 years), 128 (70-74 years), and 60 (>75 years). Geriatric recipients of DDRTx demonstrated 83.0%, 74.1%, and 64.1% uncensored graft survival at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Interestingly, these rates were similar compared with DDRTx in adults (18-64 years, P=0.49). Geriatric recipients of LDRTx demonstrated 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year graft survival rates of 94.3%, 88.8%, and 72.3%, respectively. Although better than geriatric DDRTx recipients, these results were not equal to the success of adult LDRTx recipients, potentially because of poorer graft survival in LDRTx recipients more than 75 years (P=0.004). Death-censored graft survivals were similar between adult and geriatric recipients of LDRTx (P=0.28). Graft loss secondary to death was twice as great in geriatric versus adult recipients (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

DDRTx geriatric recipients of each group showed similar uncensored graft survivals to adult DDRTx recipients. LDRTx had better outcomes than DDRTx in geriatric recipients. Death-censored outcomes were similar between adult and geriatric LDRTx recipients. These data support the equivalent outcomes of RTx in appropriately selected geriatric recipients.