Liver transplantation for hepatitis C: recurrence and disease progression in 300 patients

Poor survival after liver retransplantation: is hepatitis C to blame?

Data from 1990 to 1996 suggest that the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in repeated orthotopic liver transplantation (re-OLT) is increasing, and patient survival may be worse. Aims of the study are to: (1) assess the prevalence of HCV in re-OLT, (2) compare survival between primary OLT and re-OLT for HCV versus non-HCV diseases, and (3) evaluate Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores in re-OLT. The United Network for Organ Sharing database for adult patients undergoing primary OLT or re-OLT from January 1996 to June 2002 was analyzed. Patients with malignancy or those who underwent re-OLT within 30 days of primary OLT were excluded. A total of 22,120 primary OLTs and 2,129 re-OLTs were performed. HCV was noted in 9,564 primary OLTs (43.2%) and 899 re-OLTs (42.2%). Overall 1, 3, and 5-year patient survival rates were 86%, 79%, and 73% for primary OLT, but 67%, 56%, and 52% for re-OLT (P <.001). Survival rates of patients with HCV at 1, 3, and 5 years were 86%, 76%, and 68% for primary OLT and 61%, 50%, and 45% for re-OLT (P <.001). Survival was less for patients with HCV compared with those with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and hepatitis B for re-OLT (P <.01). However, survival after re-OLT was no different for those with HCV than for those with all other causes. MELD scores between 11 and 20 were the most common for re-OLT. A marked decreased in survival was noted in all patients who underwent re-OLT with MELD scores greater than 25. HCV prevalence in OLT has reached a plateau in recent years. Survival after re-OLT is inferior to that for primary OLT, but re-OLT survival appears to have improved. Survival after re-OLT is lower in patients with HCV compared with those with AIH and hepatitis B, but no different than for those with most other liver diseases. Survival appeared worse in patients who underwent re-OLT with a MELD score greater than 25.

Increased risk of cholestatic hepatitis C in recipients of grafts from living versus cadaveric liver donors

Histologic injury caused by recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been reported in up to 90% of HCV-infected patients who undergo liver transplantation with a cadaveric graft. However, the natural history of HCV after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is not well described. We performed a retrospective analysis of 68 consecutive HCV-infected adult patients: 45 recipients of cadaveric grafts (CAD) were compared with 23 LDLT patients. Elevated serum transaminases, positive HCV RNA, and liver biopsy consistent with histologic evidence of HCV defined recurrence. When comparing CAD with LDLT, both the incidence of HCV recurrence and time to recurrence were not different. The overall incidence of severe sequelae of HCV recurrence, either cholestatic hepatitis, grade III-IV inflammation, and/or HCV-induced graft failure requiring retransplantation, was also not different when comparing CAD with LDLT. However, when comparing CAD versus LDLT, no CAD patient developed cholestatic hepatitis C, compared with 17% of LDLT who developed this complication (P =.001). Thus, in this patient population, the timing and incidence of HCV recurrence were not different when comparing CAD versus LDLT, but the incidence of cholestatic hepatitis was significantly greater in patients with HCV who underwent LDLT.

To transplant or not to transplant recurrent hepatitis C and liver failure

In summary, re-OLT accounts for 10% of all OLTs performed and is associated with significantly increased resource use, and decreased survival compared with primary OLT. After transplantation into an HCV-infected recipient, infection of the allograft by HCV is invariable. As patients survive longer after liver transplantation, it is likely that allograft failure related to HCV recurrence will occur. Results of re-OLT for HCV are inferior to those of primary grafting, paralleling the results for retransplantation for other indications. Many studies have demonstrated that HCV infection significantly impairs patient and allograft survival after liver retransplantation, regardless of etiology of allograft failure. Patient survival rates with HCV infection are 57% to 65% at 1 year, as compared with 65% to 82% among patients without HCV infection. Experience with retransplantation is limited, however, and studies are difficult to interpret because of small sample sizes and lack of uniform definitions of survival, HCV recurrence, and allograft failure. Similar to outcomes after retransplantation for non-HCV related indications, the most common causes of death are sepsis and multi-organ failure. The high mortality associated with retransplantation has not universally been caused by recurrent disease, however recent studies have demonstrated that re-recurrent HCV occurs and the natural history is similar, if not more accelerated, after the second transplant. HCV infection may, in fact, increase mortality in a group of patients already predisposed to an inferior outcome. Preoperative serum creatinine and bilirubin have been consistently associated with survival after retransplantation and favorable results are attainable with strict selection criteria. The increasing use of expanded donor criteria, in particular, LRLT, raises important practical and ethical issues with regards to the HCV-positive transplant recipient and will become a challenge to the transplant community as a whole. With the donor morbidity and mortality associated with LRLT currently estimated at 32% and 0.3%, respectively, one must determine how much risk is acceptable to the donor in relation to the outcome in the recipient. This is especially true in HCV-infected recipients, in whom HCV re-recurrence may occur in the second allograft and lead to accelerated failure. LRLT, however, would not deplete the organ pool and would lead to the use of scarce cadaveric organs to patients who are awaiting primary liver transplantation. Despite inferior outcomes, a better tactic may be to consider retransplantation for recurrent HCV in those whose primary transplant was a LDLT, as the initial allograft did not deplete the donor pool. Given the shortage of donor organs and the increasing number of patients with HCV-induced allograft cirrhosis, identifying ways to improve allograft survival in HCV-infected patients represents an important focus for further research. Additional studies are needed to further explore the mechanisms underlying the reduction in survival and to identify which HCV-positive individuals are at greatest risk for poor survival. Studies are beginning to emerge that demonstrate that HCV recurrence can be modified with combination antiviral therapy and that the HCV virus can be eliminated. Additional longitudinal prospective studies are needed to assess the exact impact of HCV on survival after retransplantation, the effects of the newer immunosuppressive agents such as sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil on HCV, the use of preemptive antiviral therapy on HCV eradication and fibrosis modification, and the appropriateness of expanded donor criteria. Until we have longer follow-up and greater experience with the HCV-positive recipient with allograft failure, retransplantation should be considered a viable option for highly selected patients, particularly in patients in whom renal failure and severe hyperbilirubinemia have not occurred.

Treatment strategies for hepatitis C: intervention prior to liver transplant, pre-emptively or after established disease

Cirrhosis secondary to chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection accounts for most liver transplants performed in the United States and European transplant centers. Given the high prevalence of HCV infection in the general population, the lack of consistently effective antiviral therapy, and the eventual progression to cirrhosis of a subset of those infected, predictions for the future are that the number of patients in need of transplantation will increase in the coming decade. In addition, viral infection recurs nearly universally leading to the development of chronic HCV in most recipients and progression to cirrhosis after a median of 9 to 12 years in a significant proportion of these recipients.

Recurrent hepatitis C following liver transplant: diagnosis, natural history, and therapeutic options

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) related cirrhosis is the most common indication for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Updated data suggest worse long-term outcomes for those transplanted with HCV than those transplanted for other indications. Re-infection with HCV post-OLT is universal, therefore diagnosis of recurrence should be based on histological findings in the setting of persistent viremia. Variables associated with worse outcome of recurrent disease include early recurrence, degree of immunosuppression, and donor age. Antiviral therapy has been used in the prevention and treatment of recurrent disease, and can be initiated prior to transplantation, prophylactically after transplantation, and during recurrence. Preliminary studies of pre-transplantation treatment demonstrate virological responses, but tolerance is common. Higher efficacy has been associated with combination therapy for recurrent disease. Adverse effects limit its widespread use.

Outcome of liver transplantation for patients infected by hepatitis C, including those infected by genotype 4

Predictors of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease posttransplantation are still unclear. The impact of HCV genotype on outcome of transplantation has been studied, but conclusions are not in agreement. The role of HCV genotype 4 on the result of liver transplantation requires further study. The aim of this study is to examine the outcome of liver transplantation for patients with HCV genotype-4 infection. The study group included 128 patients who underwent transplantation for HCV infection: 28 patients, genotype 1; 11 patients, genotype 2; 19 patients, genotype 3; and 32 patients, genotype 4. For 64 of 128 patients, genotype was known and an assessable histological specimen was available. Median interval from transplantation to biopsy was 1.92 years (range, 0.24 to 11.48 years). Twenty-six percent of HCV genotype-4 patients developed either severe fibrosis or cirrhosis versus 6.7% in the genotype non-4 group (P =.04). A statistically significant greater fibrosis progression rate was observed in genotype-4 than genotype non-4 patients. In univariate and multivariate analysis, rapid liver fibrosis was associated with the presence of HCV genotype-4 infection. In addition, donor and recipient age and graft warm ischemic time also were associated with rate of fibrosis progression. Five-year cumulative rates for the development of cirrhosis or severe liver fibrosis were 84% in genotype-4 and 24% in genotype non-4 patients (P =.02). Five-year survival rates for patients with genotypes 1, 2/3, and 4 were 72%, 80%, and 79%, respectively (P =.8). In conclusion, 5-year survival for patients who underwent transplantation for HCV genotype-4 infection was similar to that of genotype non-4 patients; however, more severe fibrosis and rapid fibrosis progression was observed after transplantation in patients with genotype-4 infection.

A model to predict severe HCV-related disease following liver transplantation

Post-transplantation recurrence is increasing in patients with HCV. Early antiviral therapy may be of benefit in this setting. Thus, accurate and early prediction of progression may help select candidates for treatment. We developed a model based on pre- and/or early post-transplantation variables, which may predict progression to severe disease. Clinical and histologic outcomes were assessed in 554 liver recipients. A total of 1,353 biopsy specimens obtained after 1 year (median of 2 biopsies per patient; range, 1-8) were scored. Two outcome measures were used: cumulative probability of developing severe disease (fibrosis 3 and 4) within 5 years and actual progression to severe disease in 2 years. We used Cox proportional hazard survival analysis for the whole cohort. Predictors analyzed included HCV genotype and recipient, donor, and transplant-related variables. The cumulative risk of progressing to fibrosis 3 and 4 was significantly greater in patients transplanted recently (P <.001) and was present in all centers. Factors increasing this risk were genotype, induction with mycophenolate, donor age, short course of azathioprine, and prednisone (<12 months). To create a model of prediction, 285 patients with 2-year follow-up were used to create a logistic regression analysis. The estimated probability of being at high risk for severe disease was calculated from a formula that included donor age and recipient therapy as critical variables. In conclusion, we have developed a model that uses early post-transplantation variables to predict severe HCV recurrence. Accuracy of the model is not perfect (c-statistic 0.80), probably reflecting the complexity of HCV in the liver transplant setting.

All liver recipients benefit from the protocol 10-year liver biopsies

The value of late protocol biopsies after liver transplantation remains to be evaluated to highlight the therapeutic policies. The study population was composed of patients who survived with the initial graft and with an available 10-year protocol biopsy (n = 143). The long-term histologic outcome of the graft, particularly the rate of ductopenia in cases with chronic rejection (CR), and Metavir scoring of fibrosis in cases with viral chronic hepatitis (VCH), were assessed. Fibrosis progression (FP) rates were compared over 3 periods (0-5, 5-10, and 0-10 years). At 10 years, histologic abnormalities present in 80% of the patients were not identifiable from liver function tests (LFTs), which were strictly normal in 52% of the patients. Histologic CR occurred in 24% at 10 years, with a mean rate of ductopenia higher at 10 years than at 5 years (49% vs. 34%, P <.001). In cases of VCH, fibrosis worsened, with a median FP rate of 0.20 fibrosis units/year. During the first 5 years, FP was as follows; hepatitis B virus infection was greater than recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, which was greater than acquired HCV infection (P =.029). In patients with HCV, FP was higher during the second 5-year period than during the first one (P =.042). In conclusion, given the high prevalence of histologic abnormalities and the lack of sensitivity and specificity of LFTs, late protocol biopsies clearly are justified to adjust treatments, not only in HCV-infected patients in whom FP was fast and not linear, but also in the whole population of recipients.

Pretransplant MELD score as a predictor of outcome after liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis C

The Model of End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, an accurate predictor of mortality in patients awaiting liver transplantation (OLTX), did not predict graft or patient survival in the post-transplant setting. Our aim was to test the model in patients who underwent OLTX for chronic hepatitis C. Two hundred and eighty-seven adult patients who underwent primary OLTX for chronic hepatitis C between December 1993 and September 1999 were studied from a prospectively maintained database. The group was stratified by MELD scores of less than 15, 15-24, and greater than 24. Patient survival, graft survival, and interval liver biopsy pathology were reviewed. Both patient and graft survival at 3, 6, and 12 months were significantly lower in the higher MELD score groups, as was patient survival at 24 months (p-values, 0.01-0.05). The difference in survival between the low, medium, and high MELD score groups increases in time. The survival without bridging fibrosis in the allograft at 1 year post-transplant was significantly lower with higher MELD scores (p = 0.037). The decrease in survival seen in hepatitis C patients with MELD scores greater than 24 raises questions of transplant suitability for these patients. Therapeutic modalities to decrease post-transplant graft injury in these patients should be explored.

Critical analysis of the allocation policy for liver transplantation in Brazil

Liver transplantation is now the standard treatment for end-stage liver disease. Given the shortage of liver donors and the progressively higher number of patients waiting for transplantation, improvements in patient selection and optimization of timing for transplantation are needed. Several solutions have been suggested, including increasing the donor pool; a fair policy for allocation, not permitting variables such as age, gender, and race, or third-party payer status to play any role; and knowledge of the natural history of each liver disease for which transplantation is offered. To observe ethical rules and distributive justice (guarantee to every citizen the same opportunity to get an organ), the "sickest first" policy must be used. Studies have demonstrated that death has no relationship with waiting time, but rather with the severity of liver disease at the time of inclusion. Thus, waiting time is no longer part of the United Network for Organ Sharing distribution criteria. Waiting time only differentiates between equally severely diseased patients. The authors have analyzed the waiting list mortality and 1-year survival for patients of the State of S o Paulo, from July 1997 through January 2001. Only the chronological criterion was used. According to "Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo" data, among all waiting list deaths, 82.2% occurred within the first year, and 37.6% within the first 3 months following inclusion. The allocation of livers based on waiting time is neither fair nor ethical, impairs distributive justice and human rights, and does not occur in any other part of the world.

Severe recurrent hepatitis C after liver retransplantation for hepatitis C virus-related graft cirrhosis

An increase in the number of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected transplant recipients at need for repeated liver transplantation is anticipated. To date, there is a certain reluctance to accept these patients because of an increased organ shortage, early reports suggesting a poor outcome, and uncertainty regarding the natural history of recurrent hepatitis C in the second graft. The aim of this study is to determine the outcome of patients undergoing retransplantation for HCV-related graft cirrhosis. Of 49 transplant recipients with HCV-related allograft cirrhosis, 31 patients developed decompensation with criteria for retransplantation. Thirteen patients were denied this option. Of the 18 patients accepted, 6 patients died while on the waiting list (5 patients died of graft cirrhosis at a median of 3.2 months of listing), and 12 patients have undergone retransplantation (median, 10 months since HCV cirrhosis). After retransplantation, 8 patients (67%) died at a median of 8 months, and 4 patients (33%) remain alive after 1.9 years of follow-up. Causes and times of death from retransplantation were: surgical complications, n = 3 (perioperative period); HCV cirrhosis of the second graft, n = 2 (at 9 and 54 months); fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis, n = 1 (at 2 years); lymphoproliferative disorder, n = 1 (at 7 months); and endocarditis, n = 1 (at 3.5 years, with underlying cirrhosis). Of the 4 patients alive, fibrosis stages in the last biopsy specimens are stage 1 (n = 1), stage 3 (n = 1), and stage 4 or cirrhosis (n = 1; one patient has not undergone biopsy), despite antiviral therapy. The outcome of retransplantation for HCV cirrhosis of the first graft is very poor because of multiple complications. The severity of recurrent HCV disease in the second graft seems to be related to that observed in the first graft.

Discordance between ALT values and fibrosis in liver transplant recipients treated with ribavirin for recurrent hepatitis C

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence is a serious problem after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The role of ribavirin as a single agent to treat recurrent HCV is controversial. Our aim was to evaluate the correlation between alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels and histological findings in OLT recipients treated with ribavirin monotherapy for recurrent HCV. The mean [+/- standard error (SE)] age of 11 patients was 50.1 (SE +/- 8.6) years. The estimated mean dose and duration of ribavirin treatment (+/- SE) was 661.5 (+/- 52.5) mg and 20.4 (+/- 1.7) months, respectively. Five patients required either dose reduction or erythropoietin. We found a significant decrease of mean (+/- SE) ALT value from 246 +/- 44.8 U/L to 109.4 +/- 49.1 U/L (p = 0.002) in patients treated with ribavirin. However, there was also significant worsening of interface activity (p = 0.03) and fibrosis (p = 0.02). No significant association was found between ALT values and (i) stage of hepatic fibrosis, (ii) interface activity, (iii) lobular activity and (iv) HCV RNA values. Our results suggest that HCV disease can progress despite a significant decrease in ALT values. ALT values are inadequate markers of the ribavirin monotherapy and can lead to erroneous conclusions of efficacy.

Technique of bile duct reconstruction and management of biliary complications in right lobe living donor liver transplantation

From December 1999 to January 2002, 50 right lobe living donor liver transplantations were performed. The donor operations included an intraoperative cholangiography to elicit variations in bile duct anatomy. The biliary reconstruction was done whenever possible as an end-to-end microanastomosis of the donor right hepatic duct with the recipient's bile duct. As a result of the early segmental branching of the donor biliary tree, two segment bile ducts had to be anastomosed in 20 patients and three segment bile ducts in three patients. In 12 patients, a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy was performed. All anastomoses were drained externally. We observed two leakages at the resection surface which could be treated successfully by an external drainage. Six leaks occurred at the site of end-to-end biliary anastomoses. Twice the problem could be conservatively solved placing a stent percutaneously. In two patients a hepaticojejunostomy was performed after a bile duct necrosis. In two patients with an anastomotic leak, occurring 3 d, respectively, 3 month after the original transplantation, the bile duct could be directly reconstructed over a T-tube. Two anastomotic stenoses were observed, one in combination with a leak treated by percutaneous stent implantation and the second, 3 month after transplantation which was treated surgically. Biliary reconstruction after living donor liver transplantation requires microsurgical techniques and can be performed as a direct end-to-end anastomosis in most cases. Biliary complications were treated by percutaneous drainage or surgical revision in all cases.

Recent advances in liver transplantation

Advances in liver transplantation continue to evolve but are hampered by continued increasing shortages in donor organs. This has resulted in a high incidence of patients dying while on the United Network for Organ Sharing waiting list. Indeed, we continue to assess ways of expanding the donor pool by using marginal donors, living donor liver transplantation, split liver transplantation, domino transplantation, and hepatic support systems to prolong survival long enough for the patient to undergo liver transplantation. Changes in the liver allocation policy to reduce the number of people dying while waiting for an organ are discussed. Implementation of the model for end-stage liver disease allocation system should help alleviate the problem of increasing deaths of patients while on the waiting list. Recurrent disease, particularly recurrent hepatitis C, continues to be a major problem, and effective therapy is needed to prevent both progression of hepatitis C and recurrence in the graft and avoid retransplantation. The use of pegylated interferon in combination with ribavirin holds promise for improving the success in overcoming recurrent hepatitis C. Finally, advances in immunosuppression have reduced the incidence of acute cellular rejection and chronic rejection. However, these therapies have been fraught with metabolic complications that are now affecting quality of life and long-term survival. Tailoring immunosuppressive regimens to the individual patient is discussed.

Hepatic immunohistochemical staining with a monoclonal antibody against HCV-E2 to evaluate antiviral therapy and reinfection of liver grafts in hepatitis C viral infection

BACKGROUND/AIMS

A simple and reproducible hepatic immunohistochemical staining (IHS) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) is not available. We aimed to validate hepatic IHS with monoclonal antibody (Mab) IG222, directed against the HCV-envelope 2 (E2) protein.

METHODS

A three-step indirect immunoperoxidase method was used for frozen sections and a two-step indirect EnVision technique was used for paraffin-embedded sections.

RESULTS

Naturally or in vitro HCV infected primary human hepatocytes were immunoreactive to HCV-E2. In the patient study (n=253), IHS had a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 91%. Six patients who showed positivity in the liver with Mab IG222, but remained anti-HCV and HCV-RNA negative, had hepatitis C-like changes in their liver biopsy. In one patient HCV-RNA could be detected in the liver biopsy. We confirmed early graft reinfection in patients transplanted for HCV-related disease (34 patients with serial biopsies). Treatment for acute cellular rejection with steroids was associated with an increase in staining intensity. In nine patients with clearance of HCV-RNA during antiviral therapy, seven achieved negativation of immunoreactivity and two a marked reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

The IHS with Mab IG222 is an accurate tool for diagnosis and clinical management of chronic hepatitis C.

Late acute rejection after liver transplantation: the Western Canada experience

Acute rejection usually occurs within 3 months posttransplantation. Most centers reduce immunosuppression over 6 to 12 months to minimize opportunistic infection, malignancy, and drug toxicity. Pretransplant disease and low immunosuppression have been reported in association with late acute rejection (LAR). The objective of this study was to determine the incidence, predictive factors, and outcomes of LAR via retrospective review of adult liver transplant recipients in Western Canada from 1989 to 2000. LAR was defined as biopsy-proven acute rejection occurring more than 180 days posttransplantation. Patient characteristics, immunosuppression, and outcome were determined. Both a univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis were performed. LAR occurred in 97 (23%) of 415 patients more than 180 days posttransplantation. Median follow-up was 402 days (range, 180 to 3137 days); 79% of LAR episodes were graded mild. At the time of LAR, 33% were on a steroid taper. A total of 73% of LAR episodes were treated with pulse intravenous steroids, and 5% were steroid-resistant. In the univariate analysis, patients undergoing transplantation for viral etiologies and older age were associated with less LAR. Immunosuppression was significant in a multiple logistic regression model, but not with a proportional hazards model. On multivariate analysis, only patients undergoing transplantation for viral etiologies remained resistant to LAR (hazard ratio, 0.52; range, 0.34 to 0.93, P = .02). There was a trend toward increased chronic rejection in patients who developed LAR (P = .04). LAR is common and occurs after more than 1 year posttransplantation. Patients undergoing transplantation for viral etiologies seem to have a lower risk of LAR. There may be an increased risk of chronic rejection in those developing LAR.

Impact of immunosuppressive therapy on recurrence of hepatitis C

1. Approximately 10% to 25% of hepatitis C virus-infected recipients of liver allografts will develop cirrhosis within 5 years of transplantation; this acceleration of the natural history of hepatitis C is caused in part by immunosuppression. 2. Risk factors for aggressive recurrence, graft loss, and death are treated acute cellular rejection, methylprednisolone pulse therapy, and use of OKT3. There appears to be no consistent difference between cyclosporine and tacrolimus in their effects on hepatitis C. 3. The benefit of steroid withdrawal, although commonly practiced in transplant recipients with hepatitis C, has not been proven. 4. Mycophenolate mofetil may show synergistic antiviral properties when used with interferon; however, posttransplantation use has not been associated with consistent beneficial or deleterious effects. 5. Effects of other agents, such as sirolimus or interleukin-2-receptor antibodies, have not been adequately defined. Early reports suggest that disease activity may be more aggressive when these agents are constituents of the immunosuppressive regimen.

Natural history of recurrent hepatitis C

1. After liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related cirrhosis, recurrence of infection is universal, with development of histological hepatitis in the majority of patients. 2. The natural history of recurrent hepatitis C is highly variable. Although 30% to 50% of patients develop posttransplantation viremia with minimal liver injury, 10% to 30% progress to cirrhosis after a median of 5 years. 3. Progression of hepatitis C is accelerated in immunocompromised liver transplant recipients compared with immunocompetent patients, both before and after the development of compensated cirrhosis. 4. HCV-related disease progression is faster in patients who underwent transplantation in recent years compared with those who underwent transplantation earlier. 5. HCV infection significantly impairs patient and allo-graft survival after liver transplantation. 6. Several variables, including donor age, degree of immunosuppression, viral load either pretransplantation or early posttransplantation, timing of recurrence, and early histological findings, are implicated in the outcome of hepatitis C posttransplantation.

Retransplantation for recurrent hepatitis C

1. Primary orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatitis C is performed with good results. 2. Re-OLT in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected transplant recipients is performed mostly for indications other than recurrent disease in the short-term after primary OLT. 3. Progressive allograft injury and loss caused by recurrent disease predict an increased need for re-OLT for HCV recurrence in the long term. 4. Outcomes of re-OLT for recurrent hepatitis C are equivalent to results for other indications of re-OLT. 5. Good outcomes are obtained in selected patients when re-OLT is performed early in the course of recurrent disease before transplant recipients become critically ill.

Advancing donor liver age and rapid fibrosis progression following transplantation for hepatitis C

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Cirrhosis with liver failure due to hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the most common indication for liver transplantation (LT). Reinfection of the transplanted liver by HCV is inevitable, and aggressive hepatitis with accelerated progression to graft cirrhosis may be observed. Of concern, recent reports suggest that the outcome of LT for HCV may have deteriorated in recent years. Determinants of rate of progression to cirrhosis in the immunocompetent non-transplant patient are well defined, and the most powerful determinant is patient age at the time of infection. Following LT for HCV, recipient age does not affect outcome of HCV reinfection. However, the impact of donor age on graft fibrosis progression rate following LT has not been examined.

METHODS

We have examined post-transplant biopsies to assess histological activity, including fibrosis stage (scored 0-6 units, 6 representing established cirrhosis), and to calculate fibrosis progression rates in 101 post-transplant specimens from 56 HCV infected LT patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses examined the impact of parameters including recipient and donor age and sex on fibrosis progression rate, and on predicted time to cirrhosis.

RESULTS

For the cohort, median fibrosis progression rate was 0.78 units/year, and median interval from transplantation to development of cirrhosis was 7.7 years. In multivariate analysis, donor age (not recipient age) was a powerful determinant (p=0.02) of fibrosis progression rate. When the liver donor was younger than 40 years, median progression rate was 0.6 units/year and interval to cirrhosis was 10 years. When the donor was aged 50 years or more, median progression rate was 2.7 units/year and interval to cirrhosis only 2.2 years. During the observation period there has been a significant increase in donor age (p=0.01) but date of transplantation per se is not a determinant of progression rate when included in multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor age has a major influence on graft outcome following transplantation for HCV. The changing organ donor profile will affect the long term results of LT for HCV. These observations have important implications for donor liver allocation.

Liver transplantation in the UK

INTRODUCTION

This paper provides a review of the practice of liver transplantation with the main emphasis on UK practice and indications for transplantation.

REFERRAL AND ASSESSMENT

This section reviews the process of referral and assessment of patients with liver disease with reference to UK practice.

DONOR ORGANS

The practice of brainstem death and cadaveric organ donation is peculiar to individual countries and rates of donation and potential areas of improvement are addressed.

OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE

The technical innovations that have led to liver transplantation becoming a semi-elective procedure are reviewed. Specific emphasis is made to the role of liver reduction and splitting and living related liver transplantation and how this impacts on UK practice are reviewed. The complications of liver transplan-tation are also reviewed with reference to our own unit. Immunosuppression:The evolution of immunosuppression and its impact on liver transplantation are reviewed with some reference to future protocols.

RETRANSPLANTATION

The role of retransplantation is reviewed.

OUTCOME AND SURVIVAL

The results of liver transplantation are reviewed with specific emphasis on our own experience.

FUTURE

The future of liver transplantation is addressed.

Current status of liver transplantation for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma accounts for more than 5% of all malignancies with a continuous increase worldwide. The most important risk factor is liver cirrhosis, frequently associated with hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus infection. Liver resection is the only treatment that can potentially achieve cure. In carefully selected patients with a tumor smaller than 5 cm the 5-year survival is around 50%. The presence of liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension limits the feasibility of hepatic resection. Child-Pugh A patients without major associated risk factors may be considered as the ideal target group for resection. A significant local disease recurrence rate of more than 70% at 5 years is the main problem of hepatic resection. Orthotopic liver transplantation offers the possibility of removing a potentially multicentric tumor and the underlying end-stage liver disease. Due to pure selection of suitable candidates the initial reports on the efficacy of liver replacement in a cohort of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were disappointing. Taking the shortness of donor organs and the high posttransplant tumor recurrence rate into account, several groups developed criteria qualifying transplantation. A tumor size of >6 cm and gross intrahepatic portal vein involvement seem to be of significant prognostic importance. Patients with smaller solitary tumors or less than 3 tumors with a total tumor diameter of <8 cm have the same survival after transplantation as those with benign liver disease. Living donor liver transplantation offers a new approach to overcome the organ shortage and to theoretically extend the indication for transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Is it cost-effective to treat recurrent hepatitis C infection in orthotopic liver transplantation patients?

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurs in the allograft almost universally after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), with a variable course ranging from mild hepatitis to frank cirrhosis. The uncertain prognosis after OLT has lead to widely increased use of antiviral therapy in the post-OLT setting. We compared two scenarios (antiviral therapy versus no antiviral therapy) using a Markov-based decision analytic model to simulate costs and health outcomes for recurrent HCV in three age and sex cohorts of post-OLT patients. Efficacy outcomes included total costs, cases of cirrhosis prevented, cases of death prevented, life-years gained, and cost per life-year saved. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed for sustained viral response; annual drug cost, discount rate, compliance, cirrhosis rate, decompensation rate, and cost of dying. Two-way sensitivity analyses were performed to compare effects of (1) changing sustained viral response and antiviral therapy costs, and (2) changing the sustained viral response and cirrhosis rate. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the reference patient cohort of 1,000 men aged 55 years was $29,100 per life-year saved. The model was sensitive to drug costs, cirrhosis rate, and sustained viral response. The two-way sensitivity analysis showed that antiviral therapy remained cost-effective even if drug costs increased, as long as these increases were associated with higher sustained viral responses. The cost-effectiveness ratio also was sensitive to age and sex of cohort. The decision to treat HCV after OLT with antiviral therapy usually is based on many considerations. Such treatment can be cost-effective if baseline assumptions are met. Our model was sensitive to antiviral drug costs, cirrhosis rate, and sustained viral response. Patients with a progressive course of recurrent HCV are likely to have the greatest gain from antiviral therapy.

Liver transplantation for chronic liver disease: advances and controversies in an era of organ shortages

Since liver transplantation was first performed in 1968 by Starzl et al, advances in case selection, liver surgery, anaesthetics, and immunotherapy have significantly increased the indications for and success of this operation. Liver transplantation is now a standard therapy for many end stage liver disorders as well as acute liver failure. However, while demand for cadaveric organ grafts has increased, in recent years the supply of organs has fallen. This review addresses current controversies resulting from this mismatch. In particular, methods for increasing graft availability and difficulties arising from transplantation in the context of alcohol related cirrhosis, primary liver tumours, and hepatitis C are reviewed. Together these three indications accounted for 42% of liver transplants performed for chronic liver disease in the UK in 2000. Ethical frameworks for making decisions on patients' suitability for liver transplantation have been developed in both the USA and the UK and these are also reviewed.

Liver transplantation in the UK

INTRODUCTION

This paper provides a review of the practice of liver transplantation with the main emphasis on UK practice and indications for transplantation.

REFERRAL AND ASSESSMENT

This section reviews the process of referral and assessment of patients with liver disease with reference to UK practice.

DONOR ORGANS

The practice of brainstem death and cadaveric organ donation is peculiar to individual countries and rates of donation and potential areas of improvement are addressed.

OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE

The technical innovations that have led to liver transplantation becoming a semi-elective procedure are reviewed. Specific emphasis is made to the role of liver reduction and splitting and living related liver transplantation and how this impacts on UK practice are reviewed. The complications of liver transplan-tation are also reviewed with reference to our own unit. Immunosuppression:The evolution of immunosuppression and its impact on liver transplantation are reviewed with some reference to future protocols.

RETRANSPLANTATION

The role of retransplantation is reviewed.

OUTCOME AND SURVIVAL

The results of liver transplantation are reviewed with specific emphasis on our own experience.

FUTURE

The future of liver transplantation is addressed.

Functional and morphological graft monitoring after liver transplantation

The development of effective immunosuppressive drugs and the refinement of surgical procedures have led to remarkable improvements in the long-term success of liver transplantation. This procedure is now widely recognised as an effective, preferable therapeutic option for the treatment of end-stage liver disease. The early diagnosis of dysfunction is an indispensable tool for the successful management of the hepatic allograft recipient. Liver function is usually assessed by biochemical and morphological examinations, usually based on coagulation factors (fibrinogen, fibrinogen degradation peptide, factor V, prothrombin time and prolonged thromboplastin time), transaminases, gamma-GT, ALP, bilirubin and lactic acid, and histology. Liver biopsy is usually performed before the implantation of the graft to assess the viability of the liver and following liver transplantation, whenever clinical events warrant it or as part of a routine biopsy schedule.

Pathology of the liver

Traditional anatomic pathology studies and molecular investigations both contributed to the breadth of current information in the field of liver pathology this year. Techniques such as reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction can identify recurrence of hepatitis C virus infection in the liver as early as 5 days after transplantation. Chronic rejection after transplantation may be characterized not only by ductopenia but also by loss of portal tract hepatic artery branches. There are many diseases of small bile ducts in adults, and idiopathic adulthood ductopenia has been identified in extended family members. Adverse reactions to drugs may precipitate their removal from the pharmacopoeia, such as the many cases reported of severe bridging and submassive necrosis due to troglitazone (a thiazolidinedione antidiabetic agent). Several publications highlighted the association of hepatitis C virus infection with lymphoproliferative diseases and, newly, with cholangiocarcinoma.

Liver transplantation

Continued discussion over organ allocation and distribution remained a focal point in the field of liver transplantation in the year 2000. Despite the ongoing debate, no significant changes were implemented in the current allocation system. By far, the most widely discussed topic in liver transplantation this year was live donor adult-to-adult liver transplantation. Several authors reported on their initial experience, with both recipient and donor outcomes appearing excellent. As the number of transplant centers performing this procedure increases we look forward to further studies regarding the safety and long-term outcome of this innovative procedure. Studies on viral hepatitis after liver transplantation again focused on the problem of recurrent hepatitis B and hepatitis C. Several small studies found benefit in patients with hepatitis B treated with intramuscular hepatitis B immunoglobulin and lamivudine after transplantation. Although breakthrough replication remains a problem in some patients, these studies offer hope that combination therapy for hepatitis B may provide improved long-term graft survival in these patients. In patients with hepatitis C, several studies focused on identifying risk factors to predict graft recurrence of the virus after liver transplantation. Both cellular rejection and level of viral replication may be important predictors of recurrent hepatitis C virus in the graft. Early treatment reports using interferon and ribavirin suggest that some patients may have a viral response during therapy; however, it is short lived, and tolerance of medication is difficult. Certainly, we look forward to further studies looking at means of prevention and treatment of viral hepatitis in patients undergoing liver transplantation.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To analyze patient and tumor characteristics that influence patient survival to select patients who would most benefit from liver transplantation.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The selection of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for liver transplantation remains controversial.

METHODS

One hundred twelve patients with nonfibrolamellar HCC who underwent a liver transplant from 1985 to 2000 were reviewed. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with differences in outcome assessed using the log-rank procedure. Multivariate analysis was then performed using a Cox regression model.

RESULTS

Overall patient survival rates were 78%, 63%, and 57% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Patients infected with the hepatitis B virus had a worse 5-year survival than those who were not (43% vs. 64%), with most deaths being attributed to recurrent hepatitis B. However, patients with hepatitis B virus who underwent more recent transplants using antiviral therapy fared as well as those who were negative for the virus, showing a 5-year survival rate of 77%. Patients with vascular invasion by tumor had a worse 5-year survival than patients without vascular invasion (33% vs. 68%). Vascular invasion, tumor size greater than 5 cm, and poorly differentiated tumor grade were predictors of tumor recurrence by univariate analysis; however, only vascular invasion remained significant on multivariate analysis: the rate of tumor recurrence at 5 years was 65% in patients with vascular invasion and only 4% for patients without vascular invasion.

CONCLUSIONS

For well-selected patients with HCC, liver transplantation in the current era can achieve equivalent results to transplantation for nonmalignant indications. Vascular invasion is an indicator of high risk of tumor recurrence but is difficult to detect before transplantation.