Three-year follow-up after implantation of metallic coronary-artery stents

Ambulatory blood pressure variability is associated with restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in normotensive patients

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have showed that BP variability is associated with cardiovascular events. However, no data were available regarding binary restenosis as an end-point after percutenous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

This multicenter study included 100 consecutive normotensive patients with stable coronary artery disease who were planned for PCI. Before the index procedure, office BP and 24-h ambulatory BP measurements were performed. BP variability indices including systolic and diastolic 24-h average, the day and the night values of standard deviation (SD) and variation coefficient (VC) were measured and calculated. All patients underwent repeat coronary angiography at 6-month. According to angiographic results, 2 groups were formed; a restenosis group (n=30) with binary restenosis of the stented segment and a control group (n=70) with a stenosis diameter of <50% in stented segment. Systolic SD and VC values for 24-h average (14.0±2.8mmHg vs. 9.5±1.6mmHg, p<0.001 and 16%±3 vs. 11%±2, p<0.001, respectively), the day (15.2±3.9mmHg vs. 10.6±1.7mmHg, p<0.001 and 17%±4 vs. 12%±2, p<0.001, respectively), and the night (12.8±4.1mmHg vs. 8.4±2.4mmHg, p<0.001 and 14%±5 vs. 11%±3, p=0.004, respectively) values were significantly higher in restenosis group compared to control group. Similarly, diastolic SD and VC values for 24-h average (10.6±2.5mmHg vs. 8.1±1.5mmHg, p<0.001 and 12%±3 vs. 9%±2, p=0.001, respectively), the day (11.1±2.9mmHg vs. 9.0±1.8mmHg, p=0.003 and 12%±3 vs. 10%±2, p=0.006, respectively), and the night (10.0±3.6mmHg vs. 7.2±2.0mmHg, p=0.001 and 11%±5 vs. 9%±3, p=0.059, respectively) values were significantly higher in restenosis group compared to no restenosis group except for diastolic VC night. All systolic and diastolic BP variability indices except diastolic VC night were found to be independent predictors of risk of restenosis in multivariate analysis. In addition, the cut-off values of 11.4mmHg and 13% for 24-h systolic SD and VC, respectively, were found to be highly sensitive (93% for both) and specific (94% and 91%, respectively) for predicting binary restenosis at 6-month after PCI.

CONCLUSIONS

BP variability indices are significantly and independently associated with binary restenosis and higher values can predict restenosis after PCI sensitively and specifically.

Optical coherence tomographic analysis of in-stent neoatherosclerosis after drug-eluting stent implantation

BACKGROUND

We report findings from optical coherence tomography (OCT) of in-stent neoatherosclerosis as a cause of drug-eluting stent (DES) failure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Optical coherence tomography and grayscale and virtual histology intravascular ultrasound were performed in 50 patients (30 stable, 20 unstable angina) with 50 DES in-stent restenosis lesions and intimal hyperplasia >50% of stent area. Median follow-up time was 32.2 months. Overall, 26 lesions (52%) had at least 1 OCT-defined in-stent thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA)-containing neointima and 29 (58%) had at least 1 in-stent neointimal rupture. Patients presenting with unstable angina showed a thinner fibrous cap (55 μm [interquartile range 42 to 105 μm] versus 100 μm [interquartile range 60 to 205 μm], P=0.006) and higher incidence of OCT-defined TCFA-containing neointima (75% versus 37%, P=0.008), intimal rupture (75% versus 47%, P=0.044), thrombi (80% versus 43%, P=0.010), and red thrombi (30% versus 3%, P=0.012) than stable patients. Fibrous cap thickness negatively correlated with follow-up time (r=-0.318, P=0.024). Compared with DES <20 months after implantation (the best cut-off to predict TCFA-containing neointima), DES ≥20 months after implantation had a higher incidence of TCFA-containing neointima (69% versus 33%, P=0.012) and red thrombi (27% versus 0%, P=0.007). Patients with unstable (versus stable) angina had an increasing number of unstable OCT findings including TCFA-containing neointima, neointima rupture, and thrombus (P=0.027). The rate of agreement between grayscale intravascular ultrasound and OCT for detecting intimal rupture was 50% and for detecting thrombus was 44%. The agreement between virtual histology intravascular ultrasound and OCT for identifying TCFA-containing neointima was 78%.

CONCLUSIONS

In-stent neoatherosclerosis may be an important mechanism of DES failure, especially late after implantation.

Five-year clinical and angiographic outcomes of a randomized comparison of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents: results of the Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization LATE trial

BACKGROUND

Long-term comparative data of first-generation drug-eluting stents are scarce. We investigated clinical and angiographic outcomes of sirolimus-eluting (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) at 5 years as part of the Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization (SIRTAX) LATE study.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 1012 patients were randomly assigned to SES or PES. Repeat angiography was completed in 444 of 1012 patients (43.8%) at 5 years. Major adverse cardiac events occurred in 19.7% of SES- and 21.4% of PES-treated patients (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.68 to 1.17; P=0.39) at 5 years. There were no differences between SES and PES in terms of cardiac death (5.8% versus 5.7%; P=0.35), myocardial infarction (6.6% versus 6.9%; P=0.51), and target lesion revascularization (13.1% versus 15.1%; P=0.29). Between 1 and 5 years, the annual rate of target lesion revascularization was 2.0% (95% confidence interval, 1.4% to 2.6%) for SES and 1.4% (95% confidence interval, 0.9% to 2.0%) for PES. Among patients undergoing paired angiography at 8 months and 5 years, delayed lumen loss amounted to 0.37 ± 0.73 mm for SES and 0.29 ± 0.59 mm for PES (P=0.32). The overall rate of definite stent thrombosis was 4.6% for SES and 4.1% for PES (P=0.74), and very late definite stent thrombosis occurred at an annual rate of 0.65% (95% confidence interval, 0.40% to 0.90%).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term follow-up of first-generation drug-eluting stents shows no significant differences in clinical and angiographic outcomes between SES and PES. The continuous increase in late lumen loss in conjunction with the ongoing risk of very late stent thrombosis suggests that vascular healing remains incomplete up to 5 years after implantation of first-generation drug-eluting stents.

U.S. Wingspan Registry: 12-month follow-up results

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to present 12-month follow-up results for a series of patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting with the Gateway-Wingspan stenting system (Boston Scientific) for the treatment of symptomatic intracranial atherostenosis.

METHODS

Clinical and angiographic follow-up results were recorded for patients from 5 participating institutions. Primary end points were stroke or death within 30 days of the stenting procedure or ipsilateral stroke after 30 days.

RESULTS

During a 21-month study period, 158 patients with 168 intracranial atherostenotic lesions (50% to 99%) were treated with the Gateway-Wingspan system. The average follow-up duration was 14.2 months with 143 patients having at least 3 months of clinical follow-up and 110 having at least 12 months. The cumulative rate of the primary end point was 15.7% for all patients and 13.9% for patients with high-grade (70% to 99%) stenosis. Of 13 ipsilateral strokes occurring after 30 days, 3 resulted in death. Of these strokes, 76.9% (10 of 13) occurred within the first 6 months of the stenting procedure and no events were recorded after 12 months. An additional 9 patients experienced ipsilateral transient ischemic attack after 30 days. Most postprocedural events (86%) could be attributed to interruption of antiplatelet medications (n=6), in-stent restenosis (n=12), or both (n=1). In 3 patients, the events were of uncertain etiology.

CONCLUSIONS

After successful Wingspan percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting, some patients continued to experience ipsilateral ischemic events. Most of these ischemic events occurred within 6 months of the procedure and were associated with the interruption of antiplatelet therapy or in-stent restenosis.

Restenosis after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stent begins suddenly, shows short term progression, and stops suddenly

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The peak of restenosis in patients implanted with bare metal stents (BMS) is thought to be 6 months after BMS implantation, but the development of restenosis with respect to time and the peak of restenosis in patients implanted with drug-eluting stents (DES) is not known. This study aims to reveal the rate of development of restenosis with respect to time in patients implanted with DES.

METHODS

A total of 282 patients who underwent sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation in native coronary arteries at our hospital were evaluated by serial quantitative angiography at 3 and 6 months, and based on the latter results, at 1 and 2 years after SES implantation. Clinical data were collected for up to 3 years.

RESULTS

Three-year follow-up data were obtained for 261 patients. The 3-year incidence of clinically driven target-lesion revascularization (TLR) was 6.1% (16/261); of the 16 cases, 5 occurred at 3-month follow-up, 7 at 6-month angiographic follow-up, and 1 at 1-year follow up, respectively. While minimum lumen diameter (MLD) of these vessels that underwent TLR at 6 months decreased rapidly after the 3-month angiographic follow-up, MLD of the vessels with 50-70% stenosis at 6-month angiographic follow-up was almost unchanged at 1-year angiographic follow-up; however, 3 lesions required late (i.e. beyond 1 year) revascularization.

CONCLUSIONS

It is difficult to predict SES restenosis by angiography. SES restenosis begins suddenly, shows short-term progression, and stops suddenly. However, treatment of de novo coronary stenosis with SES is associated with a sustained clinical benefit and a very low incidence of TLR.

Serial angioscopic evaluation of neointimal coverage and incidence of thrombus formation after Paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation: comparison between 6- and 18-month follow-up

BACKGROUND

Long-term serial angioscopic follow-up data after paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) implantation has not previously been published. The aim of this study is to compare the angioscopic parameters such as neointimal coverage grade and prevalence of red mural thrombus at 6- and 18-month follow-up after PES implantation.

HYPOTHESIS

Neointimal formation continues to grow and prevalence of angioscopic thrombus formation becomes low over time after PES implantation.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 17 patients with 19 stents who underwent both 6- and 18-month follow-up coronary angioscopy after PES implantation. We evaluated the minimum and maximum neointimal coverage grade within 1 stent using coronary angioscopy by classifying neointimal coverage grade into 4 categories. Neointimal coverage grade and incidence of angioscopic red mural thrombus were compared between 6- and 18-month follow-up groups.

RESULTS

Minimum neointimal coverage grade at 18 months become lower than that at the 6-month follow-up (0.95 ± 0.62 at 6 mo vs 0.58 ± 0.51 at 18 mo, P = 0.035), whereas maximum grade was not significantly different (2.16 ± 0.83 at 6 mo vs 2.37 ± 0.76 at 18 mo, P = 0.248). High incidence of angioscopic red mural thrombus at 6 months was maintained even at 18-month follow-up (68% at 6 mo vs 84% at 18 mo, P = 0.224).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term serial angioscopic follow-up demonstrated persistent high incidence of red mural thrombus formation at 18 months after PES implantation.

Coronary responses and differential mechanisms of late stent thrombosis attributed to first-generation sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess the mechanism(s) of late stent thrombosis (LST) and vascular healing responses in first-generation polymeric drug-eluting stents (DES).

BACKGROUND

Recent clinical trials have reported variations in late lumen loss between first-generation sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES). Little is known, however, about the vascular responses, time course of healing, and underlying mechanism(s) of complications of LST between platforms in human coronary implants.

METHODS

The overall analysis included 174 cases (230 DES lesions) from the CVPath Institute's stent registry. Histomorphometry was performed on coronary stents from 127 patients (171 lesions) who died ≥ 30 days after receiving stent implants in which fibrin deposition, endothelial strut coverage, inflammatory response, and mechanism(s) of in-stent thrombosis were assessed.

RESULTS

Both platforms demonstrated increased neointimal thickness over time where values were greater in PES (mean 0.13 mm; range 0.03 to 0.20 mm) than SES (mean 0.10 mm; range 0.04 to 0.15 mm; p = 0.04). The percentage of uncovered struts was similar between SES and PES including stents with LST (SES = 21% vs. PES = 27%; p = 0.47). The underlying mechanism(s) of LST, however, was strikingly different between platforms; localized strut hypersensitivity was exclusive to SES, whereas malapposition secondary to excessive fibrin deposition was the underlying cause in PES. Moreover, although both PES and SES showed nearly complete strut coverage after 12 months for on-label use, the majority of stents placed for off-label indications remained unhealed after 12 months in both types of DES.

CONCLUSIONS

Differential mechanisms of LST involving either hypersensitivity or excessive fibrin were identified between first-generation DES in which overall stent healing was further delayed in DES placed for off-label indications.

Late regression of Cypher in-stent restenosis

We encountered a case of late regression after sirolimus-eluting stent restenosis. We report this case with intravascular ultrasound imaging demonstrating an intraluminal echolucent tissue, which looks like a black hole.

Late restenosis following sirolimus-eluting stent implantation

OBJECTIVES

This serial angiographic study evaluated the incidence and predictors of late restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation.

BACKGROUND

Previous studies showed late restenosis (i.e., late catch-up phenomenon) after implantation of 7-hexanoyltaxol-eluting stents and nonpolymeric, paclitaxel-eluting stents.

METHODS

Between August 2004 and December 2006, SES implantation was performed in 1,393 patients with 2,008 lesions, in whom 8-month and 2-year follow-up coronary angiography were planned.

RESULTS

Of 2,008 lesions, 1,659 (83%) underwent 8-month follow-up angiography (8.3 ± 2.2 months). Restenosis was observed in 122 lesions (7.4%). Coronary angiography 2 years (1.9 ± 0.4 years) after SES deployment was performed in 1,168 lesions (74% of lesions without restenosis at 8-month follow-up angiography). Late restenosis was observed in 83 lesions (7.1%). There was significant decrease in minimum luminal diameter (MLD) between 8-month and 2-year follow-up (2.56 ± 0.56 mm vs. 2.35 ± 0.71 mm, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed in-stent restenosis before SES implantation and MLD at 8-month follow-up as independent predictors of late restenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Between 8-month and 2-year follow-up after SES implantation, MLD decreases, which results in late restenosis in some lesions. In-stent restenosis before SES implantation and MLD at 8-month follow-up are independent predictors of late restenosis.

Eight-year clinical outcome after radioactive stent implantation: a treatment failure without irreversible long-term clinical sequelae

AIMS

To assess the long-term outcome of patients who underwent radioactive stent (RS) implantation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The RS study population consisted of 133 consecutive patients who underwent RS implantation between November 1997 and July 2000. They were matched using the propensity score method with 266 patients who underwent bare metal stenting (BMS) in the same span. Long-term survival status and information on MACE (death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or any re-intervention) was retrospectively obtained. Eight-year cumulative survival (90.2% vs. 87.4%, p = 0.57) was similar between the RS and BMS group respectively, while 8-year cumulative MACE-free survival was significantly lower in RS patients (42.1% vs. 64.3%, p < 0.001) due to the difference in events (mainly target lesion revascularisations [TLRs]) during the first year of follow-up (cumulative 1-year MACE-free survival: 59.4% vs. 86.7%, p < 0.001); there was no difference in the MACE rate after the first year (p = 0.71). The TLR rate at six months in the RS group was 29.3%, mainly due to edge restenosis and at one year 36.2% (control group: 9.5%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A high incidence of MACE and re-intervention was observed during the first year following RS implantation, mainly related to TLR for edge restenosis. After the first year, the clinical outcome of RS patients was similar to the control group indicating that there are no late adverse effects related to low dose-rate intracoronary radiation therapy.

Very late stent thrombosis after primary percutaneous coronary intervention with bare-metal and drug-eluting stents for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a 15-year single-center experience

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess the frequency of very late stent thrombosis (VLST) after stenting with bare-metal stents (BMS) and drug-eluting stents (DES) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

BACKGROUND

Stent thrombosis occurs more frequently after stenting for STEMI than after elective stenting, but there are little data regarding VLST.

METHODS

Consecutive patients (n = 1,463) who underwent stenting for STEMI were prospectively enrolled in our database. BMS were implanted exclusively from 1995 to 2002, and DES and BMS were implanted from 2003 to 2009. Follow-up was obtained at 1 to 15 years.

RESULTS

BMS patients (n = 1,095) were older and had more shock, whereas DES patients (n = 368) had more diabetes and smaller vessels. Stent thrombosis occurred in 107 patients, of which 42 were VLST (>1 year). Stent thrombosis continued to increase to at least 11 years with BMS and to at least 4.5 years with DES. Stent thrombosis rates with BMS versus DES were similar at 1 year (5.1% and 4.0%, respectively) but increased more with DES after the first year (1.9%/year vs. 0.6%/year, respectively). Landmark analysis (>1 year) found DES had a higher frequency of VLST (p < 0.001) and reinfarction (p = 0.003). DES was the only significant independent predictor of VLST (hazard ratio: 3.79, 95% confidence interval: 1.64 to 8.79, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

VLST after primary PCI for STEMI occurs with relatively high frequency to at least 11 years with BMS and to at least 4.5 years with DES. Very late stent thrombosis and reinfarction (>1 year) were more frequent with DES. New strategies are needed to manage this problem.

Very late thrombosis of a pipeline embolization device construct: case report

BACKGROUND

The Pipeline embolization device (PED) is a new endoluminal construct designed to exclude aneurysms from the parent cerebrovasculature. We report the very late (>1 year) thrombosis of a PED construct placed for the treatment of a left vertebral aneurysm.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

A patient with an occluded right vertebral artery and a large, fusiform intracranial left vertebral artery aneurysm was treated with PED and coil reconstruction. A durable, complete occlusion of the aneurysm was confirmed with control angiography at 1 year. The patient remained neurologically normal for 23 months until he experienced a transient visual disturbance followed weeks later by a minor brainstem stroke.

INTERVENTION

Imaging evaluation showed thrombosis of the PED construct with complete occlusion of the left vertebral artery. After this stroke, he was initially treated with dual antiplatelet therapy and was then converted to warfarin. The patient remained neurologically stable for 5 months until he experienced progressive basilar thrombosis that ultimately resulted in a fatal stroke.

CONCLUSION

The PED represents a promising new endovascular technology for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms; however, as an investigational device, long-term follow-up data are sparse at this point. The etiology of the very late thrombosis of the PED construct in this case remains unknown; however, this report underscores the need for a continued, careful systematic evaluation and close long-term follow-up of treated patients.

The pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Endoluminal reconstruction with flow diverting devices represents a novel constructive technique for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms. We present the results of the first prospective multicenter trial of a flow-diverting construct for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with unruptured aneurysms that were wide-necked (> 4 mm), had unfavorable dome/neck ratios (<1.5), or had failed previous therapy were enrolled in the PITA trial between January and May 2007 at 4 (3 European and 1 South American) centers. Aneurysms were treated with the PED with or without adjunctive coil embolization. All patients underwent clinical evaluation at 30 and 180 days and conventional angiography 180 days after treatment. Angiographic results were adjudicated by an experienced neuroradiologist at a nonparticipating site.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients with 31 intracranial aneurysms (6 men; 42-76 years of age; average age, 54.6 years) were treated during the study period. Twenty-eight aneurysms arose from the ICA (5 cavernous, 15 parophthalmic, 4 superior hypophyseal, and 4 posterior communicating segments), 1 from the MCA, 1 from the vertebral artery, and 1 from the vertebrobasilar junction. Mean aneurysm size was 11.5 mm, and mean neck size was 5.8 mm. Twelve (38.7%) aneurysms had failed (or recurred after) a previous endovascular treatment. PED placement was technically successful in 30 of 31 patients (96.8%). Most aneurysms were treated with either 1 (n = 18) or 2 (n = 11) PEDs. Fifteen aneurysms (48.4%) were treated with a PED alone, while 16 were treated with both PED and embolization coils. Two patients experienced major periprocedural stroke. Follow-up angiography demonstrated complete aneurysm occlusion in 28 (93.3%) of the 30 patients who underwent angiographic follow-up. No significant in-construct stenosis (≥ 50%) was identified at follow-up angiography.

CONCLUSIONS

Intracranial aneurysm treatment with the PED is technically feasible and can be achieved with a safety profile analogous to that reported for stent-supported coil embolization. PED treatment elicited a very high rate (93%) of complete angiographic occlusion at 6 months in a population of the most challenging anatomic subtypes of cerebral aneurysms.

Tissue characterization of in-stent neointima using intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis

Using virtual histology and intravascular ultrasound (VH-IVUS), tissue characterization of restenotic in-stent neointima after drug-eluting stent (DES) and bare metal stent (BMS) implantation was assessed. VH-IVUS was performed in 117 lesions (70 treated with DESs and 47 treated with BMSs) with angiographic in-stent restenosis and intimal hyperplasia (IH) > 50% of the stent area. The region of interest was placed between the luminal border and the inner border of the struts and tissue composition was reported as percentages of IH area (percent fibrous, percent fibrofatty, percent necrotic core, percent dense calcium) at the 2 sites of maximal percent IH and maximal percent necrotic core. Mean follow-up times between stent implantation and VH-IVUS study were 43.5 ± 33.8 months for BMS-treated lesions and 11.1 ± 7.8 months for DES-treated lesions (p < 0.001). The 2 groups had greater percent necrotic core and percent dense calcium at maximal percent IH and maximal percent necrotic core sites, especially in stents that had been implanted for longer periods. In conclusion, this VH-IVUS analysis showed that BMS- and DES-treated lesions develop in-stent necrotic core and dense calcium, suggesting the development of in-stent neoatherosclerosis.

Very Long-Term (15 to 20 Years) Clinical and Angiographic Outcome After Coronary Bare Metal Stent Implantation

Background—

We previously reported that the long-term luminal response after coronary bare metal stenting is triphasic, with an early restenosis phase spanning the 6 months after the index procedure, an intermediate-term regression phase from 6 months to 3 years, and a late renarrowing phase beyond 4 years. However, the clinical significance of late luminal renarrowing remains unknown.

Methods and Results—

Angiographic and clinical follow-up of the same cohort of 405 patients with successful Palmaz-Schatz stent placement was extended beyond 15 years. Clinical follow-up was completed in 98% of patients at 5 years and in 81% at 15 years. The incidence of death and cardiac death at 15 years was 45.4% and 20.6%, respectively. Paired long-term (4 to 10 years) and very long-term (>10 years) angiographic studies without intercurrent target lesion revascularization were performed in 55 lesions, and minimal luminal diameter further decreased from 1.88±0.50 mm to 1.60±0.73 mm ( P =0.002). Late target lesion revascularization after initial stabilization of the stented segments occurred rarely within 4 years. Beyond 4 years, however, the incidence of late target lesion revascularization increased steadily from 3.3% at 4 years to 24.7% at 15 years. The incidence of definite very late stent thrombosis was low (1.5% at 15 years).

Conclusions—

Luminal renarrowing of the stented segment beyond 4 years was a progressive process extending beyond 10 years. The angiographic observation of late in-stent restenosis was clinically relevant because a corresponding progressive increase in the incidence of late target lesion revascularization was observed beyond 4 years and up to 15 to 20 years after bare metal stent implantation.

Serial angiographic findings and prognosis of stent fracture site without early restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation

BACKGROUND

Stent fracture is one of the possible causes of in-stent restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation. However, long-term prognosis including late restenosis in stent fracture site without early restenosis remains unknown. The aim of this study is to investigate the risk of late restenosis at the stent fracture site without early restenosis after SES implantation.

METHODS

We divided 366 patients with 490 lesions into 2 groups with or without stent fracture based on the first scheduled follow-up coronary angiography (fracture group, 21 lesions; nonfracture group, 469 lesions). The second scheduled follow-up coronary angiography (>15 months after SES implantation) was performed in 83 patients with 124 lesions.

RESULTS

Target lesion revascularization due to late restenosis at the stent fracture site did not occur in the fracture group, but occurred in 5 lesions in the nonfracture group. At the first follow-up, minimal luminal diameter was significantly smaller and percentage diameter stenosis was significantly larger in the fracture group (1.98 ± 0.41 vs 2.52 ± 0.49 mm, P = .001 and 30.5% ± 13.1% vs 13.0% ± 8.8%, P < .0001, respectively). These differences were also present at the second follow-up (P = .01 and P = .007, respectively). In each group, there were no significant changes in minimal luminal diameter, percentage diameter stenosis, and late lumen loss between the first and second follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Late restenosis was not observed in stent fracture sites without early restenosis during the midterm follow-up after SES implantation.

Incidence and risk factors of late target lesion revascularization after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation (3-year follow-up of the j-Cypher Registry)

It yet has not been clarified whether there is a late catch-up phenomenon in target lesion revascularization (TLR) after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) compared to bare metal stent (BMS) implantation. In 12,824 patients enrolled in the j-Cypher Registry, incidences of early (within first year) and late (1 year to 3 years) TLR were compared between 17,050 lesions treated with SESs and 1,259 lesions treated with BMSs. Incidences of TLR in SES-treated lesions were 5.7% at 1 year, 8.1% at 2 years, and 10.0% at 3 years, whereas those in BMS-treated lesions were 14.2%, 15.5%, and 15.5%, respectively (p <0.0001, log-rank test). Incidences of late TLR were significantly higher with SESs compared to BMSs (2.6% vs 1.4% at 2 years and 4.5% vs 1.4% at 3 years, p = 0.0007, log-rank test). A multivariable logistic regression model identified 7 independent risk factors for late TLR at 3 years after SES implantation: hemodialysis, low estimated glomerular filtration rate, ostial right coronary artery, lesion length >or=30 mm, 2 stents for bifurcation, American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology type B2/C, and vessel size <2.5 mm. Of these, 5 factors were common to those for early TLR. In conclusion, a late catch-up phenomenon was observed as indicated by the increasing incidence of late TLR after SES, but not after BMS, implantation. Risk factors for late TLR were generally common to those for early TLR.

Coronary microvascular endothelial function deteriorates late (12 months) after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation

BACKGROUND

Coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) may reflect coronary microvascular endothelial function in the absence of significant epicardial coronary artery stenosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate coronary microvascular endothelial function late (6 and 12 months) after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation using transthoracic Doppler echocardiography.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 21 lesions from 21 patients with significant left anterior descending artery stenosis who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with SES were enrolled and studied. As a control group, 10 patients who were treated with bare metal stent (BMS) were also studied. CFVR was measured at 6 and 12 months after PCI. Coronary angiography was also performed at 6 and 12 months (SES only) after stenting. Between 6 and 12 months after SES implantation, there was no significant difference in angiographical diameter stenosis. On the other hand, CFVR significantly decreased between 6 and 12 months in the SES group (2.5±0.5 vs. 2.2±0.5, p<0.01), but not in the BMS group (2.3±0.4 vs. 2.5±0.3, p=0.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary microvascular endothelial function may deteriorate between 6 and 12 months after SES implantation.

High incidence of thrombus formation at 18 months after paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation: angioscopic comparison with sirolimus-eluting stent

BACKGROUND

Difference of neointimal formational pattern and incidence of thrombus formation between sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) at 18 months after stent implantation has not previously been reported.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 35 event-free patients who received SES (15 patients, 18 stents) or PES (20 patients, 23 stents) implantation with 18-month follow-up coronary angioscopy. We divided our patients into SES or PES groups and compared neointimal coverage pattern and incidence of red mural thrombus formation between the 2 groups. Neointimal coverage grades were classified into 4 categories. Minimum neointimal coverage grade, maximum grade, and heterogeneity score were assessed in each stent. Heterogeneity score was calculated by subtracting minimum from maximum grade within one stent.

RESULTS

Minimum neointimal coverage grade of PES was significantly lower than that of SES (0.70 +/- 0.64 vs 1.33 +/- 0.69, P = .005), whereas maximum grade was not significantly different (2.48 +/- 0.73 vs 2.22 +/- 0.73, P = .218). Heterogeneity score and incidence of red mural thrombus of PES were higher than those of SES (1.78 +/- 0.80 vs 0.89 +/- 0.76, P = .002 and 70% vs 11%, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study revealed that PES shows more heterogeneous neointimal coverage and higher incidence of thrombus formation as compared with SES at 18 months after stent implantation.

Does "late catch-up" exist in drug-eluting stents: insights from a serial quantitative coronary angiography analysis of sirolimus versus paclitaxel-eluting stents

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have suggested the possibility of late catch-up after drug-eluting stent implantation. There are limited data on whether late catch-up exists in sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PESs).

METHODS

Consecutive patients were routinely recommended 2 serial angiographic follow-ups (at 6-9 and 18-24 months post-percutaneous coronary intervention). A serial quantitative coronary angiographic analysis was performed in lesions not receiving target lesion revascularization at first follow-up. Early luminal loss (LL) was defined as the difference in minimal luminal diameter between the first angiographic follow-up and immediate post-percutaneous coronary intervention, and delayed LL was defined as the difference in minimal luminal diameter between the second and first angiographic follow-up.

RESULTS

Four hundred twelve lesions in the main cohort (PES 128, SES 284) and 47 lesions in the secondary hybrid cohort (PES 23, SES 24), which received serial angiographic follow-ups without target lesion revascularization, were included. In the main cohort, early LL was higher in PES compared with SES (0.56 vs 0.20 mm, P < .01), whereas delayed LL occurring after the first angiographic follow-up was higher in SES (0.10 vs 0.28 mm, P < .01), suggesting more prominent late catch-up in SES. Early LL showed better correlation with total LL (correlation coefficient 0.82 vs 0.30) in PES, whereas delayed LL showed better correlation with total LL (correlation coefficient 0.42 vs 0.91) in SES. Such observations were reproducible in the hybrid cohort, where both SES and PES were implanted at index procedure.

CONCLUSION

Late catch-up occurs in both PES and SES with greater delayed late loss in SES. Our data suggest that the process of neointima formation after SES and PES implantation may follow a slightly different timeline.

Outcomes with drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in saphenous vein graft intervention results from the STENT (strategic transcatheter evaluation of new therapies) group

OBJECTIVES

This study compares outcomes of drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) in patients undergoing saphenous vein graft (SVG) intervention.

BACKGROUND

The safety and efficacy of DES in patients undergoing SVG intervention is controversial.

METHODS

The STENT (Strategic Transcatheter Evaluation of New Therapies) registry is a multicenter U.S. registry evaluating outcomes with DES. Our study population includes patients undergoing PCI of SVG lesions with DES (n = 785) or BMS (n = 343) who completed 9-month or 2-year follow-up. Outcomes were adjusted with propensity analyses.

RESULTS

The DES patients had fewer emergent procedures but had smaller vessels and longer lesions. The DES patients had less death or myocardial infarction at 9 months (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.33 to 0.83, p = 0.006) and less death at 2 years (HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.36 to 0.98, p = 0.041). Target vessel revascularization (TVR) was less with DES at 9 months (7.2% vs. 10.0%, HR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.61, p < 0.001) but was no different by 2 years (18.3% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.86), although adjusted TVR rates were lower (HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.40 to 0.90, p = 0.014). The DES reduced TVR at 9 months in SVG lesions with diameter <3.5 mm (8.0% vs. 17.2%, p = 0.013) but not >or=3.5 mm (6.0% vs. 6.6%, p = 0.74).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of SVG lesions with DES vs. BMS is effective in reducing TVR at 9 months, although most of this advantage is lost at 2 years. The DES seem safe with less death or myocardial infarction, although selection bias might have affected these results. Our data suggest that DES might have short-term advantages over BMS in SVG lesions with diameter <3.5 mm.

Durability of antirestenotic efficacy in drug-eluting stents with and without permanent polymer

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess changes in antirestenotic efficacy of drug-eluting stents (DES) by restudying subjects at 2 time points after coronary stenting (6 to 8 months and 2 years) and to compare differences in time courses of late luminal loss (LLL) between 3 different DES platforms in use at our institution.

BACKGROUND

DES therapy is associated with low levels of LLL at 6 to 8 months. The temporal course of neointimal formation after this time point remains unclear.

METHODS

This prospective, observational, systematic angiographic follow-up study was conducted at 2 centers in Munich, Germany. Patients underwent stenting with permanent-polymer rapamycin-eluting stents (RES), polymer-free RES, or permanent-polymer paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES). The primary end point was delayed LLL (the difference in in-stent LLL between 6 to 8 months and 2 years).

RESULTS

Of 2,588 patients undergoing stenting, 2,030 patients (78.4%) had 6- to 8-month angiographic follow-up and were enrolled in the study. Target lesion revascularization was performed in 259 patients; these patients were not considered for further angiographic analysis. Of 1,771 remaining patients, 1,331 had available 2-year reangiographic data (75.2%). Overall mean (SD) delayed LLL was 0.12 +/- 0.49 mm (0.17 +/- 0.50 mm, 0.01 +/- 0.42 mm, and 0.13 +/- 0.50 mm in permanent-polymer RES, polymer-free RES, and permanent-polymer PES groups, respectively [p < 0.001]). In multivariate analysis, only stent type (in favor of polymer-free RES) predicted delayed LLL.

CONCLUSIONS

Ongoing erosion of luminal caliber beyond 6 to 8 months after the index procedure is observed following DES implantation. Absence of permanent polymer from the DES platform seems to militate against this effect.

Very late changes in the dilated lesion following coronary balloon angioplasty: a 17 year serial quantitative angiographic study

AIMS

Limited data are available on the changes that occur at the dilated site many years after coronary balloon angioplasty. The development of bioabsorbable stents may increase the importance of understanding the long term changes that occur in an unscaffolded coronary artery following balloon-mediated injury.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study evaluated, by serial quantitative angiography, the natural history of changes that occurred in the dilated segment between early (mean seven months), late (mean 4.5 years) and very late (mean 17 years) follow-up after balloon angioplasty. Of 127 consecutive patients (174 lesions) with successful coronary angioplasty, 125 underwent early, 84 late and 47 very late angiographic follow-up (75% of eligible survivors). The mean lesion diameter stenosis decreased from 36+/-11% at early to 26+/-15% at late follow-up (p<0.0001), and then increased again to 35+/-25% by very late follow-up (p=0.003). Although stenosis severity at early follow-up angiography predicted lesion regression at late follow-up, there was no significant correlation between late and very late follow-up lesion severity.

CONCLUSIONS

After coronary angioplasty, lesion regression at the dilated site from 7 months to 4.5 years is followed by slow lesion progression over the next 12 years.

Extended follow-up by serial angioscopic observation for bare-metal stents in native coronary arteries: from healing response to atherosclerotic transformation of neointima

BACKGROUND

Although coronary angiograms after bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation show late luminal narrowing beyond 4 years, the detailed changes inside the BMS have not yet been fully elucidated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Serial angiographic and angioscopic examinations were performed immediately (baseline), 6 to 12 months (first follow-up), and >or=4 years (second follow-up) after stenting without target lesion revascularization in 26 segments of 26 patients who received BMS deployment for their native coronary arteries. Angioscopic observation showed atherosclerotic yellow plaque crushed out by stent struts in 22 patients (85%) and mural thrombus in 21 patients (81%) at baseline. At first follow-up, white neointimal hyperplasia was almost completely buried inside the struts, and both yellow plaque and thrombus had decreased in comparison with baseline (12% and 4%, respectively; P<0.001). The frequencies of yellow plaque and thrombus increased from the first to second follow-ups (58% and 31%, respectively; P<0.05). All of the yellow plaques in the second follow-up were located not exterior to the struts but protruding from the vessel wall into the lumen. Late luminal narrowing, defined as an increasing of percent diameter stenosis between the first and second follow-ups, was greater in segments with yellow plaque than in those without yellow plaque (18.4+/-17.3% versus 3.6+/-4.2%, respectively; P=0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

This angiographic and angioscopic study suggests that white neointima of the BMS may often change into yellow plaque over an extended period of time, and atherosclerotic progression inside the BMS may contribute to late luminal narrowing.

Detection of stent fractures: a comparison of 64-slice CT, conventional cine-angiography, and intravascular ultrasonography

RATIONAL AND OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the ability of 64-slice computed tomography (CT), conventional cine-angiography, and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to detect stent fractures under ideal conditions. Coronary stent fracture has been implicated as one of the mechanisms of stent thrombosis and, perhaps, in-stent restenosis. However, the preferred imaging modality in detecting fractures in coronary stents has not been well established.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four different types of commonly used coronary stents (Cypher, Taxus, Vision, Hepacoat) each with three strut fractures (Cypher, 5; Taxus, 5; Vision, 4; Hepacoat, 5) were nominally deployed in polyurethane tubes and imaged with 64-slice CT, conventional cine-angiography, and IVUS. For each stent type, an unfractured control stent was also imaged.

RESULTS

Overall accuracy (84.1% vs. 73.9%), sensitivity (80.7 vs. 77.2%), and specificity (100% vs. 58.3%) for stent fracture detection was higher with 64 multislice CT compared to conventional cine-angiography. Stent fractures were not accurately detected by IVUS. Fracture detection by multislice CT was best when the stents were imaged at 45 degrees to the z-axis.

CONCLUSIONS

Under ideal in vitro conditions, CT has a high accuracy when used to evaluate coronary stent fractures. The overall accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of detecting stent fractures are lower by conventional cine-angiography. Stent fractures were not detected using IVUS.

Long-term follow-up after deferring angioplasty in asymptomatic patients with moderate noncritical in-stent restenosis

BACKGROUND

Many patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) are angina-free, but the optimal treatment for these patients remains uncertain.

HYPOTHESIS

In cases with asymptomatic moderate noncritical ISR. deferral of the intervention may be safe and associated with favorable clinical outcome.

METHODS

We evaluated the long-term clinical outcome of asymptomatic patients (Group 1, n = 98) with moderate noncritical ISR (< 70% diameter stenosis) after intervention was deferred, and compared it with that of patients (Group 2, n = 655) without restenosis. After repeat angioplasty was deferred, all patients were treated medically and later underwent angioplasty only in the case of clinical recurrence.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Clinical follow-up was available in all patients at 26.3+/-15.9 months. Twenty patients died during the follow-up: 1 in Group 1 and 19 in Group 2. Target lesion revascularization was performed in 3 patients in Group 1 and 11 patients in Group 2 during follow-up (p = NS), and new lesion revascularization in 2 patients in Group 1 and 27 patients in Group 2 (p = NS). Event-free survival rate (cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization) was 86.7+/-6.1% in Group 1 and 84.8+/-2.2% in Group 2 at the end of follow-up (p = NS). Major adverse cardiac events were only associated with the presence of diabetic mellitus (hazards ratio 2.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48-4.73, p<0.01). The percentage of patients receiving antianginal medication was similar between the two groups at the end of the study (p = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Asymptomatic patients with moderate noncritical ISR have a good prognosis and similar clinical outcome as those without ISR, suggesting that it may be safe to defer repeat angioplasty in these patients until angina recurrence.

Coronary stent deployment in a young adult with Kawasaki disease and recurrent myocardial infarction

A 19-year-old man developed a huge coronary aneurysm and stenosis in the right coronary artery as a sequela of Kawasaki disease (KD) that resulted in recurrent episodes of myocardial infarction. Coronary ischemic events were successfully prevented after balloon angioplasty followed by coronary stent implantation into the stenotic lesion. The stent deployment may have an advantage compared with balloon angioplasty and other new devices for the treatment for patients with KD showing stenotic lesions without dense calcification.

Long-term angiographic follow-up after successful repeat balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis

BACKGROUND

Coronary stent implantation is associated with improved angiographic short-term and mid-term clinical outcome. However, restenosis rate still remains between 20 and 30%.

HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of the study, performed as a prospective angiographic follow-up to detect restenosis, was to evaluate the immediate and the 6-month angiographic results of repeat balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis.

METHODS

From April 1996 to September 1997, 335 stenting procedures performed in 327 patients underwent prospectively 6-month control angiography. Of the 96 lesions that showed in-stent restenosis (> 50% diameter stenosis) (29%), 72 underwent balloon angioplasty.

RESULTS

The primary success rate was 100%. Follow-up angiogram at a mean of 6.9 +/- 2.4 months was obtained in 54 patients. Recurrent restenosis was observed in 24 of the 55 stents (44%). Repeat intervention for diffuse and body location in-stent restenosis before repeat intervention was associated with significantly higher rates of recurrent restenosis (p < 0.001 and p < 0.05, respectively). Of the 19 patients who underwent further balloon angioplasty (100% success rate), coronary angiography was performed in 18 (95%) at a mean of 8.2 +/- 2.0 months and showed recurrent restenosis in 12 patients (67%). Further repeat intervention for diffuse and severe in-stent restenosis before the second repeat intervention was associated with significantly higher rates of further recurrent restenosis (p < 0.05 and p < 0.005, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Although balloon angioplasty can be safely, successfully, and repeatedly performed after stent restenosis, it carries a progressively high recurrence of angiographic restenosis rate during repeat 6-month follow-ups. The subgroup of patients with diffuse, severe, and/or body location in-stent restenosis proved to be at higher risk of recurrent restenosis.

Long-term outcomes of patients receiving drug-eluting stents

BACKGROUND

We sought to establish the long-term safety of drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents in a usual care setting.

METHODS

Using data from a prospective multicentre registry, we compared rates of death and of death or repeat revascularization during 3 years of follow-up of 6440 consecutive patients who underwent angioplasty with either drug-eluting or bare-metal stents between Apr. 1, 2003, and Mar. 31, 2006.

RESULTS

Drug-eluting stents were inserted in 1120 patients and bare-metal stents in 5320. The drug-eluting stents were selected for patients who had a greater burden of comorbid illness, including diabetes mellitus (32.8% v. 20.8% in the bare-metal group, p < 0.001) and renal disease (7.4% v. 5.0%, p = 0.001). At 1-year follow-up, the drug-eluting stents were associated with a mortality of 3.0%, as compared with 3.7% with the bare-metal stents (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46-0.83). The rate of the composite outcome of death or repeat revascularization was 12.0% for the drug-eluting stents and 15.8% for the bare-metal stents (adjusted OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.33-0.49). In the subgroup of patients who had acute coronary syndromes, the adjusted OR for this composite outcome was 0.46 (95% CI 0.35-0.61). During the 3 years of observation, the relative risks for death and repeat revascularization varied over time. In year 1, there was an initial period of lower risk in the group with drug-eluting stents than in the group with bare-metal stents; this was followed by a shift toward outcome rates favouring bare-metal stents in years 2 and 3. The adjusted relative risk of the composite outcome of death or repeat revascularization associated with drug-eluting stents relative to bare-metal stents was 0.73 early in the first year of follow-up; it then rose gradually over time, to a peak of 2.24 at 3 years.

INTERPRETATION

Drug-eluting stents are safe and effective in the first year following insertion. Thereafter, the possibility of longer term adverse events cannot be ruled out.

The evaluation of primary stenting of sirolimus-eluting versus bare-metal stents in the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions of crural arteries

A comparison was made of sirolimus-eluting stents and bare stents as an effective means of treatment of stenosis in crural arteries. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: (1) patients treated with sirolimus-eluting stents and (2) patients treated with bare stents. Each group consisted of 25 patients, and every patient had one stent implanted. All patients showed symptoms of ischemia of the peripheral arteries, classified according to the Rutherford scale into categories 3, 4, and 5. All patients were examined 24 h before and 24 h and 6 months after the intervention. The results were analyzed according to clinical, hemodynamic, and angiographic criteria. Technically, the procedure was successful in 100% of cases, and both groups presented an equal improvement in clinical and hemodynamic parameters. The follow-up angiographic examination demonstrated a significantly lower rate of restenosis among the sirolimus-eluting stent group (4, 16%) versus the bare stent group (19, 76%) (p < 0.001), with lower target lesion revascularization in 3 (12%) versus 14 (56%) (p < 0.05), respectively. Quantitative angiography demonstrated that all variables used to assess restenosis were superior for sirolimus-eluting stents 6 months after intervention: late lumen loss 0.46 +/- 0.72 versus 1.70 +/- 0.94 (p < 0.001) and minimal lumen diameter 2.25 +/- 0.82 versus 0.99 +/- 1.08 (p < 0.001). Results of this study reveal that the use of sirolimus-eluting stents decreases the risk of restenosis in comparison to standard stents.

Restenosis in coronary bare metal stents. Importance of time to follow-up: a comparison of coronary angiograms 6 months and 4 years after implantation

OBJECTIVES

Angiographic late lumen loss measured 6 to 9 month after bare metal stent implantation in the coronary arteries is a validated restenosis parameter.

DESIGN

We performed a second angiographic follow-up after 4 years in event free survivors from the DANSTENT trial cohort.

RESULTS

Quantitative comparison of paired coronary angiograms at 6 months and 4 years showed a reduction of late loss from 0.68+/-0.52 mm to 0.42 (+/-0.52) (mean difference 0.26 (0.17 to 0.36), p<0.0001). Minimal instent lumen diameter had increased from 2.39+/-0.62 mm to 2.64+/-0.56 mm (mean difference: -0.24 mm, 95% confidence interval: -0.34 mm to -0.14 mm, p<0.0001). Instent diameter stenosis decreased from 24.8+/-14.2% to 18.6+/-9.3% (mean difference 6.16%, 95% confidence interval: 2.82 to 9.48%, p=0.0006). This observed spontaneous decrease of instent restenosis corresponds to a 19% increase of minimal cross-sectional vessel area and a 39% reduction of the binary restenosis rate over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Instent late lumen loss in bare metal stents decreases spontaneously over time. Maturation of early hyperplastic tissue reaction after stent implantation with subsequent thinning of fibrotic tissue might explain this phenomenon.