101
|
Parsons SK, Kelly MJ, Cohen JT, Castellino SM, Henderson TO, Kelly KM, Keller FG, Henzer TJ, Kumar AJ, Johnson P, Meyer RM, Radford J, Raemaekers J, Hodgson DC, Evens AM. Early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma in the modern era: simulation modelling to delineate long-term patient outcomes. Br J Haematol 2018; 182:212-221. [PMID: 29707774 PMCID: PMC6055753 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.15255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2017] [Accepted: 03/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
We developed a novel simulation model integrating multiple data sets to project long-term outcomes with contemporary therapy for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (ESHL), namely combined modality therapy (CMT) versus chemotherapy alone (CA) via 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography response-adaption. The model incorporated 3-year progression-free survival (PFS), probability of cure with/without relapse, frequency of severe late effects (LEs), and 35-year probability of LEs. Furthermore, we generated estimates for quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and unadjusted survival (life years, LY) and used model projections to compare outcomes for CMTversusCA for two index patients. Patient 1: a 25-year-old male with favourable ESHL (stage IA); Patient 2: a 25-year-old female with unfavourable ESHL (stage IIB). Sensitivity analyses assessed the impact of alternative assumptions for LE probabilities. For Patient 1, CMT was superior to CA (CMT incremental gain = 0·11 QALYs, 0·21 LYs). For Patient 2, CA was superior to CMT (CA incremental gain = 0·37 QALYs, 0·92 LYs). For Patient 1, the advantage of CMT changed minimally when the proportion of severe LEs was reduced from 20% to 5% (0·15 QALYs, 0·43 LYs), whereas increasing the severity proportion for Patient 2's LEs from 20% to 80% enhanced the advantage of CA (1·1 QALYs, 6·5 LYs). Collectively, this detailed simulation model quantified the long-term impact that varied host factors and alternative contemporary treatments have in ESHL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan K Parsons
- Department of Pediatrics, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.,Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts MC, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Hematology/Oncology, Tufts MC, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael J Kelly
- Department of Pediatrics, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, The Floating Hospital for Children at Tufts Medical Center (MC), Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joshua T Cohen
- Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.,Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts MC, Boston, MA, USA.,Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts MC, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sharon M Castellino
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Tara O Henderson
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kara M Kelly
- Department of Pediatrics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, University of Buffalo School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Frank G Keller
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Tobi J Henzer
- Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts MC, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anita J Kumar
- Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.,Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts MC, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Hematology/Oncology, Tufts MC, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Ralph M Meyer
- Department of Oncology, Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre and McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - John Radford
- University of Manchester and the Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - John Raemaekers
- Department of Haematology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - David C Hodgson
- Radiation Medicine Programme, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew M Evens
- Division of Blood Disorders, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| |
Collapse
|
102
|
Balancing risk and benefit in early-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 2018; 131:1666-1678. [DOI: 10.1182/blood-2017-10-772665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2017] [Accepted: 02/07/2018] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
With defined chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT) and risk-adapted treatment, early-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) has become curable in a majority of patients. Hence, a major current goal is to reduce treatment-related toxicity while maintaining long-term disease control. Patients with early-stage favorable disease (ie, limited stage without risk factors [RFs]) are frequently treated with 2 cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (2×ABVD) followed by 20-Gy involved-field or involved-site RT (IF/ISRT). In patients with early-stage unfavorable disease (ie, limited stage with RFs), 4 cycles of chemotherapy are usually consolidated with 30-Gy IF/ISRT. Compared with 4×ABVD, 2 cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (2×BEACOPPescalated) followed by 2×ABVD improved 5-year progression-free survival (PFS), with similar 5-year overall survival. Recently, treatment strategies based on [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) response were evaluated. In early-stage unfavorable HL, a majority of patients achieved a negative interim PET after 2×ABVD and an excellent outcome after 4×ABVD, whereas in those with a positive interim PET, 2×BEACOPPescalated improved 5-year PFS. Furthermore, a PET-guided RT approach was evaluated to decrease long-term toxicity. Although both the RAPID and H10 trials reported poorer disease control without RT, PET-guided omission of RT can constitute a valid therapeutic option in patients with an increased risk of RT-associated toxicity (eg, because of sex, age, or disease localization). Implementation of drugs such as the anti-CD30 antibody-drug conjugate brentuximab vedotin or the anti–programmed death 1 antibodies nivolumab or pembrolizumab might allow further reduction of overall mortality and improve quality of life in affected patients.
Collapse
|
103
|
Shanbhag S, Ambinder RF. Hodgkin lymphoma: A review and update on recent progress. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68:116-132. [PMID: 29194581 PMCID: PMC5842098 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 290] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2017] [Revised: 09/18/2017] [Accepted: 09/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a unique hematopoietic neoplasm characterized by cancerous Reed-Sternberg cells in an inflammatory background. Patients are commonly diagnosed with HL in their 20s and 30s, and they present with supradiaphragmatic lymphadenopathy, often with systemic B symptoms. Even in advanced-stage disease, HL is highly curable with combination chemotherapy, radiation, or combined-modality treatment. Although the same doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine chemotherapeutic regimen has been the mainstay of therapy over the last 30 years, risk-adapted approaches have helped de-escalate therapy in low-risk patients while intensifying treatment for higher risk patients. Even patients who are not cured with initial therapy can often be salvaged with alternate chemotherapy combinations, the novel antibody-drug conjugate brentuximab, or high-dose autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The programmed death-1 inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab have both demonstrated high response rates and durable remissions in patients with relapsed/refractory HL. Alternate donor sources and reduced-intensity conditioning have made allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation a viable option for more patients. Future research will look to integrate novel strategies into earlier lines of therapy to improve the HL cure rate and minimize long-term treatment toxicities. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:116-132. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satish Shanbhag
- Assistant Professor of Medicine, Departments of Medicine and Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Richard F Ambinder
- Director, Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Professor of Oncology, Departments of Medicine and Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
104
|
Pierdominici M, Maselli A, Locatelli SL, Ciarlo L, Careddu G, Patrizio M, Ascione B, Tinari A, Carlo-Stella C, Malorni W, Matarrese P, Ortona E. Estrogen receptor β ligation inhibits Hodgkin lymphoma growth by inducing autophagy. Oncotarget 2018; 8:8522-8535. [PMID: 28052027 PMCID: PMC5352419 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.14338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2016] [Accepted: 12/05/2016] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Although Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is curable with current therapy, at least 20% of patients relapse or fail to make complete remission. In addition, patients who achieve long-term disease-free survival frequently undergo infertility, secondary malignancies, and cardiac failure, which are related to chemotherapeutic agents and radiation therapies. Hence, new therapeutic strategies able to counteract the HL disease in this important patient population are still a matter of study. Estrogens, in particular 17β-estradiol (E2), have been suggested to play a role in lymphoma cell homeostasis by estrogen receptors (ER) β activation. On these bases, we investigated whether the ligation of ERβ by a selective agonist, the 2,3-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)-propionitrile (DPN), could impact HL tumor growth. We found that DPN-mediated ERβ activation led to a reduction of in vitro cell proliferation and cell cycle progression by inducing autophagy. In nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient (NOD/SCID) mice engrafted with HL cells, ERβ activation by DPN was able to reduce lymphoma growth up to 60% and this associated with the induction of tumor cell autophagy. Molecular characterization of ERβ-induced autophagy revealed an overexpression of damage-regulated autophagy modulator 2 (DRAM2) molecule, whose role in autophagy modulation is still debated. After ERβ activation, both DRAM2 and protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3), a key actor in the autophagosome formation, strictly interacted each other and localized at mitochondrial level. Altogether these results suggest that targeting ERβ with selective agonists might affect HL cell proliferation and tumor growth via a mechanism that brings into play DRAM2-dependent autophagic cascade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Pierdominici
- Department of Cell Biology and Neurosciences, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Angela Maselli
- Department of Therapeutic Research and Medicine Evaluation, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia L Locatelli
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Humanitas Cancer Center - Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milano, Italy
| | - Laura Ciarlo
- Department of Therapeutic Research and Medicine Evaluation, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppa Careddu
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Humanitas Cancer Center - Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milano, Italy
| | - Mario Patrizio
- Department of Therapeutic Research and Medicine Evaluation, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Barbara Ascione
- Department of Therapeutic Research and Medicine Evaluation, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonella Tinari
- Department of Technology and Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Carmelo Carlo-Stella
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Humanitas Cancer Center - Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milano, Italy
| | - Walter Malorni
- Department of Therapeutic Research and Medicine Evaluation, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Paola Matarrese
- Department of Therapeutic Research and Medicine Evaluation, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Elena Ortona
- Department of Cell Biology and Neurosciences, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
105
|
Burnelli R, Rinieri S, Rondelli R, Todesco A, Bianchi M, Garaventa A, Zecca M, Indolfi P, Conter V, Santoro N, Aricò M, Cesaro S, D’amico S, Farruggia P, De Santis R, Locatelli F, Pileri SA, Scarzello G, Mascarin M, Vecchi V. Long-term results of the AIEOP MH’96 childhood Hodgkin’s lymphoma trial and focus on significance of response to chemotherapy and its implication in low risk patients to avoid radiotherapy. Leuk Lymphoma 2018; 59:2612-2621. [DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2018.1435872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Burnelli
- Pediatric Oncology Hematology “Lalla Seragnoli”, Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - Simona Rinieri
- Pediatric Onco-Hematology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Sant’Anna di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Roberto Rondelli
- Pediatric Oncology Hematology “Lalla Seragnoli”, Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandra Todesco
- Clinic of Pediatric Hemato-Oncology, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Maurizio Bianchi
- Division of Pediatric Onco-Hematology, Regina Margherita Children’s Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | | | - Marco Zecca
- Pediatric Haematology/Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico “San Matteo”, Pavia, Italy
| | - Paolo Indolfi
- Pediatric Oncology Service, Pediatric Department, Second University of Naples, Napoli, Italy
| | - Valentino Conter
- Clinica Pediatrica, Università di Milano-Bicocca, Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo, Monza, Italy
| | - Nicola Santoro
- Division of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Bari, Italy
| | - Maurizio Aricò
- Department of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria A. Meyer Children Hospital, Firenze, Italy
| | - Simone Cesaro
- Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Salvatore D’amico
- Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, - Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele, Catania, Italy
| | - Piero Farruggia
- Department of Oncology, Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Unit, A.R.N.A.S. Ospedali Civico Di Cristina e Benfratelli, Palermo, Italy
| | - Raffaela De Santis
- Unit of Pediatrics, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy
| | - Franco Locatelli
- Dipartimento di Oncoematologia Pediatrica, Ospedale Bambino Gesù, IRCCS Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano A. Pileri
- Chair of Pathology and Unit of Haematopathology, Department of Haematology and Oncological Sciences “L. and A. Seràgnoli”, Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Maurizio Mascarin
- S.S. Radioterapia Pediatrica e Area Giovani, IRCCS, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico Aviano, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Vico Vecchi
- Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Oncology Unit, “Infermi” Hospital, Rimini, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
106
|
|
107
|
Reduced-Intensity Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma: Updated Results of the Open-Label, International, Randomised Phase 3 HD15 Trial by the German Hodgkin Study Group. Hemasphere 2017; 1:e5. [PMID: 31723734 PMCID: PMC6745969 DOI: 10.1097/hs9.0000000000000005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2017] [Accepted: 10/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
The international, randomized phase 3 HD15 trial established 6xeBEACOPP as standard therapy for patients with newly diagnosed advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) within the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG). We performed a follow-up analysis to assess long-term efficacy and safety of this approach. Between 2003 and 2008, 2182 patients aged 18 to 60 years were recruited and randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio between 8 or 6 cycles of eBEACOPP or 8 cycles of the dose-dense BEACOPP-14 regimen, each followed by 30 Gy radiotherapy in case of positron emission tomography (PET)-positive residual lesions ≥2.5 cm. The study aimed at demonstrating non-inferiority regarding efficacy of the 2 experimental arms on a significance level of 2.5% each. The intention-to-treat analysis comprised 2126 patients with a median follow-up of 102 months. Ten-year progression-free survival was 81% (97.5% CI 77–85) with 8xeBEACOPP, 84% (80–87) with 6xeBEACOPP, and 84% (80–87) with 8xBEACOPP-14; the non-inferiority margin of 1.51 for the hazard ratio (HR) could be excluded for both comparisons (6xeBEACOPP, HR = 0.7, 97.5% CI 0.5–1.0; 8xBEACOPP-14, HR = 0.9, 97.5% CI 0.7–1.2). Overall survival at 10 years was 88% (85–91), 90% (88–93), and 92% (89–94), respectively. A total of 142 second malignancies corresponding to 10-year cumulative incidences of 10%, 7%, and 7% and standardized incidence ratios of 4.3, 2.5, and 2.8 were reported for 8xeBEACOPP, 6xeBEACOPP, and 8xBEACOPP-14, respectively. This updated analysis of the HD15 trial thus confirms the efficacy and reports on the long-term safety of a shortened first-line chemotherapy consisting of 6xeBEACOPP followed by PET-guided radiotherapy in advanced-stage HL.
Collapse
|
108
|
Adolescent and young adult lymphoma: collaborative efforts toward optimizing care and improving outcomes. Blood Adv 2017; 1:1945-1958. [PMID: 29296842 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2017008748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2017] [Accepted: 08/12/2017] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Lymphomas are responsible for approximately 20% to 25% of annual cancer diagnoses in the adolescent and young adult (AYA) population. In 2006, the National Cancer Institute and the Lance Armstrong Foundation developed a joint Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology Progress Review Group (AYAO-PRG) to formally address the unique cancer burden of patients age 15 to 39 years. As part of their recommendations, the AYAO-PRG identified 5 imperatives for improving outcomes of AYAs with cancer. Broadly, the recommended areas of focus included research, awareness and education, investigational infrastructure, care delivery, and advocacy. In response to the challenges highlighted by the AYAO-PRG, the Lymphoma Research Foundation held the first AYA Lymphoma Research Foundation Symposium on 2 October 2015. At this symposium, clinicians and basic scientists from both pediatric and adult disciplines gave presentations describing the state of the science and proposed a collaborative research agenda built on the imperatives proposed by the AYAO-PRG. The following review presents an in-depth discussion of lymphoma management across pediatric and adult oncologic disciplines, focusing on Hodgkin lymphoma, mature B-cell lymphomas, and anaplastic large cell lymphoma.
Collapse
|
109
|
Allen PB, Gordon LI. Frontline Therapy for Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma by Stage and Prognostic Factors. Clin Med Insights Oncol 2017; 11:1179554917731072. [PMID: 28989291 PMCID: PMC5624347 DOI: 10.1177/1179554917731072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2017] [Accepted: 06/20/2017] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Hodgkin lymphoma is a highly curable malignancy in early and advanced stages. Most patients are diagnosed in their teens or twenties and are expected to live decades beyond their treatment. Therefore, the toxicity of treatment must be balanced with the goal of cure. Thus, treatment has been refined through prognostic models and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT)-directed therapy. Stratification by prognostic models defines groups of patients with favorable characteristics who may be treated with less intensive therapy upfront, including fewer cycles of chemotherapy, lower doses of radiation, or omission of radiation altogether. Alternatively, high-risk patients may be assigned to a more aggressive initial approach. The modern use of interim PET-CT allows further tailoring of treatment by response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela B Allen
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center and Division of Hematology and Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Leo I Gordon
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
110
|
Westin GF, Dias AL, Go RS. Exploring Big Data in Hematological Malignancies: Challenges and Opportunities. Curr Hematol Malig Rep 2017; 11:271-9. [PMID: 27177742 DOI: 10.1007/s11899-016-0331-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Secondary analysis of large datasets has become a useful alternative to address research questions outside the reach of clinical trials. It is increasingly utilized in hematology and oncology. In this review, we provided an overview of some examples of commonly used large datasets in the USA and described common research themes that can be pursued using such a methodology. We selected a sample of 14 articles on adult hematologic malignancies published in 2015 and highlighted their contributions as well as limitations.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
- Databases, Factual
- Hematologic Neoplasms/diagnosis
- Hematologic Neoplasms/economics
- Hematologic Neoplasms/pathology
- Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy
- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
- Hodgkin Disease/diagnosis
- Hodgkin Disease/economics
- Hodgkin Disease/pathology
- Hodgkin Disease/therapy
- Humans
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/diagnosis
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/economics
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/pathology
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy
- Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/diagnosis
- Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/economics
- Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/pathology
- Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/therapy
- Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis
- Multiple Myeloma/economics
- Multiple Myeloma/pathology
- Multiple Myeloma/therapy
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo F Westin
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Ajoy L Dias
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Ronald S Go
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
111
|
Odei B, Boothe D, Frandsen J, Poppe MM, Gaffney DK. The Role of Radiation in All Stages of Nodular Lymphocytic Predominant Hodgkin Lymphoma. CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA 2017; 17:819-824. [PMID: 29051078 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2017.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2016] [Revised: 09/07/2017] [Accepted: 09/15/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The goal of this study was to assess the survival differences seen in early-stage and advanced-stage nodular lymphocytic predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) based on treatment modality. PATIENTS AND METHODS The National Cancer Database was queried to identify patients diagnosed with NLPHL between 2004 and 2012. Overall survival (OS) was determined using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analysis were used to estimate differences in OS between treatment groups. RESULTS A total of 1968 patients were identified for analysis, consisting of stage I (40.4%), stage II (29.3%), stage III (22.3%), and stage IV (8.0%) disease. The median age of patients was 46 years. The following factors were predictive of radiotherapy (RT) omission in treatment: increasing age, black race, Medicare insurance, chemotherapy use, stage II to IV disease, and the presence of B-symptoms. On survival analysis, RT was associated with prolonged OS in all stages of NLPHL (50.1 vs. 42.4 months; P < .01). The OS benefit of RT persisted on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 0.37; P < .01). On subset analysis, RT was associated with prolonged OS in early disease (49.8 vs. 45.5 months; P < .01), whereas a trend towards an OS benefit was observed in advanced-stage (54.1 vs. 39.6 months; P = .06) NLPHL. Radiotherapy was also associated with prolonged OS among patients with B-symptoms (49.0 vs. 42.6 months; P < .01). CONCLUSION The use of RT in NLPHL is less likely among those with advanced-stage disease and B-symptoms. However, we found RT to be associated with prolonged OS in all stages of NLPHL, including those with B-symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bismarck Odei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Dustin Boothe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Jonathan Frandsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Matthew M Poppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - David K Gaffney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
| |
Collapse
|
112
|
Franklin J, Eichenauer DA, Becker I, Monsef I, Engert A, Cochrane Haematological Malignancies Group. Optimisation of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for untreated Hodgkin lymphoma patients with respect to second malignant neoplasms, overall and progression-free survival: individual participant data analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 9:CD008814. [PMID: 28901021 PMCID: PMC6483617 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008814.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Efficacy and the risk of severe late effects have to be well-balanced in treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Late adverse effects include secondary malignancies which often have a poor prognosis. To synthesise evidence on the risk of secondary malignancies after current treatment approaches comprising chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, we performed a meta-analysis based on individual patient data (IPD) from patients treated for newly diagnosed HL. OBJECTIVES We investigated several questions concerning possible changes in the risk of secondary malignancies when modifying chemotherapy or radiotherapy (omission of radiotherapy, reduction of the radiation field, reduction of the radiation dose, use of fewer chemotherapy cycles, intensification of chemotherapy). We also analysed whether these modifications affect progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE and Cochrane CENTRAL trials databases comprehensively in June 2010 for all randomised trials in HL since 1984. Key international trials registries were also searched. The search was updated in March 2015 without collecting further IPD (one further eligible study found) and again in July 2017 (no further eligible studies). SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for untreated HL patients which enrolled at least 50 patients per arm, completed recruitment by 2007 and performed a treatment comparison relevant to our objectives. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Study groups submitted IPD, including age, sex, stage and the outcomes secondary malignant neoplasm (SMN), OS and PFS as time-to-event data. We meta-analysed these data using Petos method (SMN) and Cox regression with inverse-variance pooling (OS, PFS) for each of the five study questions, and performed subgroup and sensitivity analyses to assess the applicability and robustness of the results. MAIN RESULTS We identified 21 eligible trials and obtained IPD for 16. For four studies no data were supplied despite repeated efforts, while one study was only identified in 2015 and IPD were not sought. For each study question, between three and six trials with between 1101 and 2996 participants in total and median follow-up between 6.7 and 10.8 years were analysed. All participants were adults and mainly under 60 years. Risk of bias was assessed as low for the majority of studies and outcomes. Chemotherapy alone versus same chemotherapy plus radiotherapy. Omitting additional radiotherapy probably reduces secondary malignancy incidence (Peto odds ratio (OR) 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.23 to 0.82, low quality of evidence), corresponding to an estimated reduction of eight-year SMN risk from 8% to 4%. This decrease was particularly true for secondary acute leukemias. However, we had insufficient evidence to determine whether OS rates differ between patients treated with chemotherapy alone versus combined-modality (hazard ratio (HR) 0.71, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.11, moderate quality of evidence). There was a slightly higher rate of PFS with combined modality, but our confidence in the results was limited by high levels of statistical heterogeneity between studies (HR 1.31, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.73, moderate quality of evidence). Chemotherapy plus involved-field radiation versus same chemotherapy plus extended-field radiation (early stages) . There is insufficient evidence to determine whether smaller radiation field reduces SMN risk (Peto OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.16, low quality of evidence), OS (HR 0.89, 95% C: 0.70 to 1.12, high quality of evidence) or PFS (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.21, high quality of evidence). Chemotherapy plus lower-dose radiation versus same chemotherapy plus higher-dose radiation (early stages). There is insufficient evidence to determine the effect of lower-radiation dose on SMN risk (Peto OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.50, low quality of evidence), OS (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.28, high quality of evidence) or PFS (HR 1.20, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.48, high quality of evidence). Fewer versus more courses of chemotherapy (each with or without radiotherapy; early stages). Fewer chemotherapy courses probably has little or no effect on SMN risk (Peto OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.62), OS (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.73 to1.34) or PFS (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.45).Outcomes had a moderate (SMN) or high (OS, PFS) quality of evidence. Dose-intensified versus ABVD-like chemotherapy (with or without radiotherapy in each case). In the mainly advanced-stage patients who were treated with intensified chemotherapy, the rate of secondary malignancies was low. There was insufficient evidence to determine the effect of chemotherapy intensification (Peto OR 1.37, CI 0.89 to 2.10, low quality of evidence). The rate of secondary acute leukemias (and for younger patients, all secondary malignancies) was probably higher than among those who had treatment with standard-dose ABVD-like protocols. In contrast, the intensified chemotherapy protocols probably improved PFS (eight-year PFS 75% versus 69% for ABVD-like treatment, HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.7 to 0.95, moderate quality of evidence). Evidence suggesting improved survival with intensified chemotherapy was not conclusive (HR: 0.85, CI 0.70 to 1.04), although escalated-dose BEACOPP appeared to lengthen survival compared to ABVD-like chemotherapy (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.79, moderate quality of evidence).Generally, we could draw valid conclusions only in terms of secondary haematological malignancies, which usually occur less than 10 years after initial treatment, while follow-up within the present analysis was too short to record all solid tumours. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The risk of secondary acute myeloid leukaemia and myelodysplastic syndrome (AML/MDS) is increased but efficacy is improved among patients treated with intensified chemotherapy protocols. Treatment decisions must be tailored for individual patients. Consolidating radiotherapy is associated with an increased rate of secondary malignancies; therefore it appears important to define which patients can safely be treated without radiotherapy after chemotherapy, both for early and advanced stages. For early stages, treatment optimisation methods such as use of fewer chemotherapy cycles and reduced field or reduced-dose radiotherapy did not appear to markedly affect efficacy or secondary malignancy risk. Due to the limited amount of long-term follow-up in this meta-analysis, further long-term investigations of late events are needed, particularly with respect to secondary solid tumours. Since many older studies have been included, possible improvement of radiotherapy techniques must be considered when interpreting these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy Franklin
- University Hospital of CologneInstitute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and EpidemiologyKerpener Str. 62CologneGermany50937
| | - Dennis A. Eichenauer
- University Hospital of CologneDepartment I of Internal Medicine, Center of Integrated Oncology Köln BonnCologneGermany50924
| | - Ingrid Becker
- University Hospital of CologneInstitute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and EpidemiologyKerpener Str. 62CologneGermany50937
| | - Ina Monsef
- University Hospital of CologneCochrane Haematological Malignancies Group, Department I of Internal MedicineKerpener Str. 62CologneGermany50924
| | - Andreas Engert
- University Hospital of CologneDepartment I of Internal MedicineKerpener Str. 62CologneGermany50924
| | | |
Collapse
|
113
|
Jiang T, Wang F, Hu L, Cheng X, Zheng Y, Liu T, Jia Y. Chidamide and decitabine can synergistically induce apoptosis of Hodgkin lymphoma cells by up-regulating the expression of PU.1 and KLF4. Oncotarget 2017; 8:77586-77594. [PMID: 29100410 PMCID: PMC5652801 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.20659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2017] [Accepted: 07/25/2017] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Epigenetic abnormalities play important roles in the pathogenesis of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Highly expressed class I histone acetyltransferase (HDAC) and hyper-methylation of the promoter region of tumor suppressor genes have been demonstrated in Hodgkin lymphoma. In this paper, we investigated the synergistic effects of combination treatment of chidamide, a selective HDAC inhibitor, and decitabine, a demethylation agent, for HL cell lines and explored a new strategy for treating HL. The apoptosis rates, cell cycle, mitochondrial transmembrane potentials, epigenetic changes and gene expression of HL cell lines treated with chidamide as a single agent and in combination with decitabine were tested. We found that chidamide inhibited the proliferation of HL cells through increased apoptosis. Interestingly, after combined with decitabine, the inhibition rate and apoptotic death in HL cells were significantly increased. Further studies demonstrated that when combined with decitabine the expression of acetylated histone H3 and H3K9 induced by chidamide in HL cells increased, and also the expression of tumor suppressor genes PU.1 and KLF4, which exert inhibition through apoptosis pathway. Therefore, we could come to a conclusion that chidamide and decitabine can synergistically induce apoptosis of Hodgkin lymphoma cells by up-regulating the expression of PU.1 and KLF4. These results provide a new sight in combining two different epigenetic regulatory agents for treating HL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Jiang
- Department of Hematology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China.,Department of Hematology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu 610072, Sichuan, China
| | - Fujue Wang
- Department of Hematology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China.,Laboratory of Hematology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Tianfu Life Science Park, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Lianjie Hu
- Department of Hematology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China.,Laboratory of Hematology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Tianfu Life Science Park, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Xiaomin Cheng
- Department of Hematology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China.,Department of Hematology, Chengdu Military General Hospital, Chengdu 610083, Sichuan, China
| | - Yuhuan Zheng
- Department of Hematology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China.,Laboratory of Hematology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Tianfu Life Science Park, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Ting Liu
- Department of Hematology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China.,Laboratory of Hematology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Tianfu Life Science Park, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Yongqian Jia
- Department of Hematology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China.,Laboratory of Hematology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Tianfu Life Science Park, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
114
|
Abstract
This topic addresses the treatment of newly diagnosed patients with favorable prognosis stage I and II Hodgkin lymphoma. In most cases, combined modality therapy (chemotherapy followed by involved site radiation therapy) constitutes the current standard of care. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. By combining the most recent medical literature and expert opinion, this revised guideline can aid clinicians in the appropriate use of combined modality therapy for favorable prognosis stage I and II Hodgkin lymphoma. Increasing information about the late effects of treatment has led to attempts to decrease toxicity by using less chemotherapy (decreased duration and/or intensity or different agents) and less radiation therapy (reduced volume and/or dose) while maintaining excellent efficacy.
Collapse
|
115
|
Bates JE, Dhakal S, Mazloom A, Casulo C, Constine LS. Benefit from the inclusion of radiation therapy in the treatment of patients with stage III classical Hodgkin lymphoma: A propensity matched analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Radiother Oncol 2017; 124:325-330. [PMID: 28778348 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2017] [Revised: 07/13/2017] [Accepted: 07/15/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While stage III and IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients are often combined and defined as "advanced stage," there are significant differences in disease distribution and burden between the two stages. This may obscure advantages of radiotherapy (RT) in a combined modality therapy strategy in stage III disease due to the relative lack of benefit in stage IV patients. METHODS We queried the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, restricting our search to patients with stage III classical HL diagnosed from 2004 to 2012, to examine the difference in overall and cause-specific survival (OS and CSS) between patients who did or did not receive RT. RESULTS Patients treated with RT had improved OS and CSS relative to those treated without RT (5-year OS 91.6% with RT compared to 71.4% without RT, HR=0.34, p<0.001) and CSS (5-year OS 95.4% with RT compared to 84.7% without RT, HR=0.32, p<0.001). A benefit in OS and/or CSS was seen in all patient subgroups except for older adults (>64years). CONCLUSION These data support at least a cautionary approach to omitting RT from treatment strategies for patients with advanced stage HL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James E Bates
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Sughosh Dhakal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, USA
| | - Ali Mazloom
- Tacoma Valley Radiation Oncology Center, USA
| | - Carla Casulo
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, USA
| | - Louis S Constine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
116
|
Infradiaphragmatic Hodgkin lymphoma: a large series of patients staged with PET-CT. Oncotarget 2017; 8:85110-85119. [PMID: 29156707 PMCID: PMC5689597 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.19389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2017] [Accepted: 06/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Infradiaphragmatic Hodgkin Lymphoma (IDHL) accounts for 3-11% of adult cases of stage I-II Hodgkin Lymphoma and the treatment strategy in IDHL is still heterogeneous. All previous published studies were conducted before the PET-CT era. PET may provide a more accurate evaluation of IDHL stage. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical and biological characteristics of IDHL patients staged by CT scan or PET-CT in eight French hematology departments and their impact on outcomes in these patients. Methods Baseline clinical and biological data and outcomes in patients with a first diagnosis of stage I-II IDHL treated with ABVD +/- radiotherapy were retrospectively collected. Results Among the 99 patients included, 65 (66%) were staged with PET-CT. These patients were older (53 years vs 46 years, p=0.043), had lower ESR (27 vs 58mm, p=0.022), higher hemoglobin level (13.6 vs 12.8g/dL, p=0.015), less frequent Ann Arbor stage II (74% vs 91%) and less central adenopathy involvement (60% vs 82%, p=0.024). Treatment was chemotherapy alone in 55% of patients and the remaining patients received chemo-radiotherapy (CRT). Five-year PFS and OS rates in PET-CT-staged patients were 78% (95% CI 64-87) and 88% (95% CI 73-95), respectively, compared with 65% (p=0.225) and 82% (p=0.352) in CT-staged patients. The CRT strategy was associated with fewer relapses (p=0.027). Conclusion This study showed that the characteristics of CT-staged IDHL patients were less favorable than those of PET-CT-staged patients and indicated that CRT provided better PFS than did chemotherapy alone.
Collapse
|
117
|
Abstract
18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is currently the most valuable imaging technique in Hodgkin lymphoma. Since its first use in lymphomas in the 1990s, it has become the gold standard in the staging and end-of-treatment remission assessment in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma. The possibility of using early (interim) PET during first-line therapy to evaluate chemosensitivity and thus personalize treatment at this stage holds great promise, and much attention is now being directed toward this goal. With high probability, it is believed that in the near future, the result of interim PET-CT would serve as a compass to optimize treatment. Also the role of PET in pre-transplant assessment is currently evolving. Much controversy surrounds the possibility of detecting relapse after completed treatment with the use of PET in surveillance in the absence of symptoms suggestive of recurrence and the results of published studies are rather discouraging because of low positive predictive value. This review presents current knowledge about the role of 18-FDG-PET/CT imaging at each point of management of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma.
Collapse
|
118
|
Sasse S, Bröckelmann PJ, Goergen H, Plütschow A, Müller H, Kreissl S, Buerkle C, Borchmann S, Fuchs M, Borchmann P, Diehl V, Engert A. Long-Term Follow-Up of Contemporary Treatment in Early-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma: Updated Analyses of the German Hodgkin Study Group HD7, HD8, HD10, and HD11 Trials. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:1999-2007. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.70.9410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Combined-modality treatment is widely considered the standard of care in early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), and treatment intensity has been reduced over the last years. Long-term follow-up is important to judge both efficacy and safety of the different therapies used. Patients and Methods We analyzed updated follow-up data on 4,276 patients treated within the German Hodgkin Study Group trials HD7 and HD10 for early-stage favorable HL and HD8 and HD11 for early-stage unfavorable HL between 1993 and 2003. Results In HD7 (N = 627; median follow-up, 120 months), combined-modality treatment was superior to extended-field radiotherapy (RT), with 15-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 73% versus 52% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3 to 0.6; P < .001), without differences in overall survival (OS). In HD10 (N = 1,190; median follow-up, 98 months), noninferiority of two cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (ABVD) plus 20 Gy involved-field (IF)–RT to more intensive four cycles of ABVD plus 30 Gy IF-RT was confirmed with 10-year PFS of 87% each (HR, 1.0; 95%, 0.6 to 1.5) and OS of 94% each (HR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.5 to 1.6), respectively. In both trials, no differences in second neoplasias were observed. In HD8 (N = 1,064; median follow-up, 153 months), noninferiority of involved-field RT to extended-field RT regarding PFS was confirmed (HR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.8 to 1.2). In HD11 (N = 1,395; median follow-up, 106 months), superiority of bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone at baseline over ABVD was not observed. After BEACOPPbaseline, 20 Gy IF-RT was noninferior to 30 Gy (10-year PFS, 84% v 84%; HR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.7 to 1.5). In contrast, PFS was inferior in ABVD-treated patients receiving 20 Gy instead of 30 Gy IF-RT (10-year PFS, 76% v 84%; HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0 to 2.1). No differences in OS or second neoplasias were observed in in both trials. Conclusion Long-term follow-up data of the four randomized trials largely support the current risk-adapted therapeutic strategies in early-stage HL. Nevertheless, continued follow-up is necessary to assess the long-term safety of currently applied therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Sasse
- All authors: German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Paul J. Bröckelmann
- All authors: German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Helen Goergen
- All authors: German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Annette Plütschow
- All authors: German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Horst Müller
- All authors: German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stefanie Kreissl
- All authors: German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Carolin Buerkle
- All authors: German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sven Borchmann
- All authors: German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Michael Fuchs
- All authors: German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Peter Borchmann
- All authors: German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Volker Diehl
- All authors: German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Andreas Engert
- All authors: German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
119
|
Evolution of lymphoma staging and response evaluation: current limitations and future directions. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2017; 14:631-645. [DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.78] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
|
120
|
André MP, Girinsky T, Federico M, Reman O, Fortpied C, Gotti M, Casasnovas O, Brice P, van der Maazen R, Re A, Edeline V, Fermé C, van Imhoff G, Merli F, Bouabdallah R, Sebban C, Specht L, Stamatoullas A, Delarue R, Fiaccadori V, Bellei M, Raveloarivahy T, Versari A, Hutchings M, Meignan M, Raemaekers J. Early Positron Emission Tomography Response–Adapted Treatment in Stage I and II Hodgkin Lymphoma: Final Results of the Randomized EORTC/LYSA/FIL H10 Trial. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:1786-1794. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.68.6394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 321] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Patients who receive combined modality treatment for stage I and II Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) have an excellent outcome. Early response evaluation with positron emission tomography (PET) scan may improve selection of patients who need reduced or more intensive treatments. Methods We performed a randomized trial to evaluate treatment adaptation on the basis of early PET (ePET) after two cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) in previously untreated—according to European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria favorable (F) and unfavorable (U)—stage I and II HL. The standard arm consisted of ABVD followed by involved-node radiotherapy (INRT), regardless of ePET result. In the experimental arm, ePET-negative patients received ABVD only (noninferiority design), whereas ePET-positive patients switched to two cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPPesc) and INRT (superiority design). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results Of 1,950 randomly assigned patients, 1,925 received an ePET—361 patients (18.8%) were positive. In ePET-positive patients, 5-year PFS improved from 77.4% for standard ABVD + INRT to 90.6% for intensification to BEACOPPesc + INRT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.74; P = .002). In ePET-negative patients, 5-year PFS rates in the F group were 99.0% versus 87.1% (HR, 15.8; 95% CI, 3.8 to 66.1) in favor of ABVD + INRT; the U group, 92.1% versus 89.6% (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 0.8 to 2.5) in favor of ABVD + INRT. For both F and U groups, noninferiority of ABVD only compared with combined modality treatment could not be demonstrated. Conclusion In stage I and II HL, PET response after two cycles of ABVD allows for early treatment adaptation. When ePET is positive after two cycles of ABVD, switching to BEACOPPesc + INRT significantly improved 5-year PFS. In ePET-negative patients, noninferiority of ABVD only could not be demonstrated: risk of relapse is increased when INRT is omitted, especially in patients in the F group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc P.E. André
- Marc P.E. André, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir; Catherine Fortpied, Valeria Fiaccadori, and Tiana Raveloarivahy, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Théodore Girinsky and Christophe Fermé, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Oumédaly Reman, Institut d’Hématologie de Basse Normandie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Caen; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris Hôpital Saint-Louis; Richard Delarue, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de
| | - Théodore Girinsky
- Marc P.E. André, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir; Catherine Fortpied, Valeria Fiaccadori, and Tiana Raveloarivahy, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Théodore Girinsky and Christophe Fermé, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Oumédaly Reman, Institut d’Hématologie de Basse Normandie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Caen; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris Hôpital Saint-Louis; Richard Delarue, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de
| | - Massimo Federico
- Marc P.E. André, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir; Catherine Fortpied, Valeria Fiaccadori, and Tiana Raveloarivahy, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Théodore Girinsky and Christophe Fermé, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Oumédaly Reman, Institut d’Hématologie de Basse Normandie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Caen; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris Hôpital Saint-Louis; Richard Delarue, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de
| | - Oumédaly Reman
- Marc P.E. André, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir; Catherine Fortpied, Valeria Fiaccadori, and Tiana Raveloarivahy, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Théodore Girinsky and Christophe Fermé, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Oumédaly Reman, Institut d’Hématologie de Basse Normandie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Caen; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris Hôpital Saint-Louis; Richard Delarue, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de
| | - Catherine Fortpied
- Marc P.E. André, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir; Catherine Fortpied, Valeria Fiaccadori, and Tiana Raveloarivahy, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Théodore Girinsky and Christophe Fermé, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Oumédaly Reman, Institut d’Hématologie de Basse Normandie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Caen; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris Hôpital Saint-Louis; Richard Delarue, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de
| | - Manuel Gotti
- Marc P.E. André, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir; Catherine Fortpied, Valeria Fiaccadori, and Tiana Raveloarivahy, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Théodore Girinsky and Christophe Fermé, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Oumédaly Reman, Institut d’Hématologie de Basse Normandie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Caen; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris Hôpital Saint-Louis; Richard Delarue, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de
| | - Olivier Casasnovas
- Marc P.E. André, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir; Catherine Fortpied, Valeria Fiaccadori, and Tiana Raveloarivahy, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Théodore Girinsky and Christophe Fermé, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Oumédaly Reman, Institut d’Hématologie de Basse Normandie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Caen; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris Hôpital Saint-Louis; Richard Delarue, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de
| | - Pauline Brice
- Marc P.E. André, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir; Catherine Fortpied, Valeria Fiaccadori, and Tiana Raveloarivahy, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Théodore Girinsky and Christophe Fermé, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Oumédaly Reman, Institut d’Hématologie de Basse Normandie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Caen; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris Hôpital Saint-Louis; Richard Delarue, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de
| | - Richard van der Maazen
- Marc P.E. André, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir; Catherine Fortpied, Valeria Fiaccadori, and Tiana Raveloarivahy, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Théodore Girinsky and Christophe Fermé, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Oumédaly Reman, Institut d’Hématologie de Basse Normandie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Caen; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris Hôpital Saint-Louis; Richard Delarue, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de
| | - Alessandro Re
- Marc P.E. André, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir; Catherine Fortpied, Valeria Fiaccadori, and Tiana Raveloarivahy, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Théodore Girinsky and Christophe Fermé, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Oumédaly Reman, Institut d’Hématologie de Basse Normandie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Caen; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris Hôpital Saint-Louis; Richard Delarue, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de
| | - Véronique Edeline
- Marc P.E. André, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir; Catherine Fortpied, Valeria Fiaccadori, and Tiana Raveloarivahy, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Théodore Girinsky and Christophe Fermé, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Oumédaly Reman, Institut d’Hématologie de Basse Normandie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Caen; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris Hôpital Saint-Louis; Richard Delarue, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de
| | - Christophe Fermé
- Marc P.E. André, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir; Catherine Fortpied, Valeria Fiaccadori, and Tiana Raveloarivahy, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Théodore Girinsky and Christophe Fermé, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Oumédaly Reman, Institut d’Hématologie de Basse Normandie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Caen; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris Hôpital Saint-Louis; Richard Delarue, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de
| | - Gustaaf van Imhoff
- Marc P.E. André, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir; Catherine Fortpied, Valeria Fiaccadori, and Tiana Raveloarivahy, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Théodore Girinsky and Christophe Fermé, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Oumédaly Reman, Institut d’Hématologie de Basse Normandie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Caen; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris Hôpital Saint-Louis; Richard Delarue, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de
| | - Francesco Merli
- Marc P.E. André, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir; Catherine Fortpied, Valeria Fiaccadori, and Tiana Raveloarivahy, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Théodore Girinsky and Christophe Fermé, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Oumédaly Reman, Institut d’Hématologie de Basse Normandie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Caen; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris Hôpital Saint-Louis; Richard Delarue, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de
| | - Réda Bouabdallah
- Marc P.E. André, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir; Catherine Fortpied, Valeria Fiaccadori, and Tiana Raveloarivahy, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Théodore Girinsky and Christophe Fermé, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Oumédaly Reman, Institut d’Hématologie de Basse Normandie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Caen; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris Hôpital Saint-Louis; Richard Delarue, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de
| | - Catherine Sebban
- Marc P.E. André, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir; Catherine Fortpied, Valeria Fiaccadori, and Tiana Raveloarivahy, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Théodore Girinsky and Christophe Fermé, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Oumédaly Reman, Institut d’Hématologie de Basse Normandie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Caen; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris Hôpital Saint-Louis; Richard Delarue, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de
| | - Lena Specht
- Marc P.E. André, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir; Catherine Fortpied, Valeria Fiaccadori, and Tiana Raveloarivahy, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Théodore Girinsky and Christophe Fermé, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Oumédaly Reman, Institut d’Hématologie de Basse Normandie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Caen; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris Hôpital Saint-Louis; Richard Delarue, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de
| | - Aspasia Stamatoullas
- Marc P.E. André, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir; Catherine Fortpied, Valeria Fiaccadori, and Tiana Raveloarivahy, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Théodore Girinsky and Christophe Fermé, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Oumédaly Reman, Institut d’Hématologie de Basse Normandie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Caen; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris Hôpital Saint-Louis; Richard Delarue, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de
| | - Richard Delarue
- Marc P.E. André, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir; Catherine Fortpied, Valeria Fiaccadori, and Tiana Raveloarivahy, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Théodore Girinsky and Christophe Fermé, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Oumédaly Reman, Institut d’Hématologie de Basse Normandie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Caen; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris Hôpital Saint-Louis; Richard Delarue, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de
| | - Valeria Fiaccadori
- Marc P.E. André, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir; Catherine Fortpied, Valeria Fiaccadori, and Tiana Raveloarivahy, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Théodore Girinsky and Christophe Fermé, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Oumédaly Reman, Institut d’Hématologie de Basse Normandie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Caen; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris Hôpital Saint-Louis; Richard Delarue, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de
| | - Monica Bellei
- Marc P.E. André, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir; Catherine Fortpied, Valeria Fiaccadori, and Tiana Raveloarivahy, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Théodore Girinsky and Christophe Fermé, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Oumédaly Reman, Institut d’Hématologie de Basse Normandie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Caen; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris Hôpital Saint-Louis; Richard Delarue, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de
| | - Tiana Raveloarivahy
- Marc P.E. André, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir; Catherine Fortpied, Valeria Fiaccadori, and Tiana Raveloarivahy, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Théodore Girinsky and Christophe Fermé, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Oumédaly Reman, Institut d’Hématologie de Basse Normandie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Caen; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris Hôpital Saint-Louis; Richard Delarue, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de
| | - Annibale Versari
- Marc P.E. André, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir; Catherine Fortpied, Valeria Fiaccadori, and Tiana Raveloarivahy, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Théodore Girinsky and Christophe Fermé, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Oumédaly Reman, Institut d’Hématologie de Basse Normandie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Caen; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris Hôpital Saint-Louis; Richard Delarue, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de
| | - Martin Hutchings
- Marc P.E. André, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir; Catherine Fortpied, Valeria Fiaccadori, and Tiana Raveloarivahy, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Théodore Girinsky and Christophe Fermé, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Oumédaly Reman, Institut d’Hématologie de Basse Normandie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Caen; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris Hôpital Saint-Louis; Richard Delarue, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de
| | - Michel Meignan
- Marc P.E. André, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir; Catherine Fortpied, Valeria Fiaccadori, and Tiana Raveloarivahy, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Théodore Girinsky and Christophe Fermé, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Oumédaly Reman, Institut d’Hématologie de Basse Normandie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Caen; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris Hôpital Saint-Louis; Richard Delarue, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de
| | - John Raemaekers
- Marc P.E. André, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir; Catherine Fortpied, Valeria Fiaccadori, and Tiana Raveloarivahy, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium; Théodore Girinsky and Christophe Fermé, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Oumédaly Reman, Institut d’Hématologie de Basse Normandie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Caen; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris Hôpital Saint-Louis; Richard Delarue, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de
| |
Collapse
|
121
|
Affiliation(s)
- Ralph M. Meyer
- Ralph M. Meyer, McMaster University and Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
122
|
Gonzalez VJ. Role of Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Hodgkin Lymphoma. Curr Hematol Malig Rep 2017; 12:244-250. [DOI: 10.1007/s11899-017-0385-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
123
|
Marr KC, Connors JM, Savage KJ, Goddard KJ, Deyell RJ. ABVD chemotherapy with reduced radiation therapy rates in children, adolescents and young adults with all stages of Hodgkin lymphoma. Ann Oncol 2017; 28:849-854. [PMID: 28327925 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We adopted ABVD chemotherapy with risk-adapted radiation therapy (RT) as first-line therapy for children, adolescents and young adults with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) in British Columbia in 2004. Patients and methods Patients ≤ 25 years diagnosed from 2004 to 2013 with all stages of HL who received ABVD as initial therapy were included. Results Among 55 children (age < 18 year) and 154 young adults (18-25 year), there were no significant differences among age groups for sex, histologic subtype, tumour bulk, B symptoms, prognostic risk groups or treatment received. The rates of complete response, partial response and progressive disease were 84%, 7% and 10% for children and 95%, 4% and 1% for young adults (P=0.01), respectively. Treatment failures in children all occurred within one year of completion, while 8/21 (38%) relapses in young adults occurred later (P=0.04). With a median follow-up of 66 months the 5-year progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 85 ± 3% and 97 ± 1%, respectively. For limited stage disease, PFS was 90 ± 7% for children and 93 ± 3% for young adults (P=0.65); OS was 100% for both. For advanced stage patients, PFS and OS were also similar for the children and young adults (77 ± 7% versus 81 ± 4%; P=0.38 and OS 90 ± 6% versus 97 ± 2%; P=0.17). The rate of consolidative RT was low (21%) and did not differ between age groups. Conclusion ABVD is an effective treatment in children, adolescents and young adults with HL. Children were less likely to achieve complete response and demonstrated earlier relapses compared to young adults. RT may be omitted for the majority of patients while maintaining excellent 5-year OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K C Marr
- Division of Paediatric Hematology/Oncology/Bone Marrow Transplantation, British Columbia Children's Hospital
| | - J M Connors
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, Centre for Lymphoid Cancer
| | - K J Savage
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, Centre for Lymphoid Cancer
| | - K J Goddard
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - R J Deyell
- Division of Paediatric Hematology/Oncology/Bone Marrow Transplantation, British Columbia Children's Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
124
|
Blank O, von Tresckow B, Monsef I, Specht L, Engert A, Skoetz N, Cochrane Haematological Malignancies Group. Chemotherapy alone versus chemotherapy plus radiotherapy for adults with early stage Hodgkin lymphoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 4:CD007110. [PMID: 28447341 PMCID: PMC6478261 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007110.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Combined modality treatment consisting of chemotherapy followed by localised radiotherapy is the standard treatment for patients with early stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). However, due to long- term adverse effects such as secondary malignancies the role of radiotherapy has been questioned recently and some clinical study groups advocate chemotherapy only for this indication. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of chemotherapy alone compared to chemotherapy plus radiotherapy in adults with early stage HL . SEARCH METHODS For the or i ginal version of this review, we searched MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL as well as conference proceedings (American Society of Hematology, American Society of Clinical Oncology and International Symposium of Hodgkin Lymphoma) from January 1980 to November 2010 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing chemotherapy alone versus chemotherapy regimens plus radiotherapy. For the updated review we searched MEDLINE, CENTRAL and conference proceedings to December 2016. SELECTION CRITERIA We included RCTs comparing chemotherapy alone with chemotherapy plus radiotherapy in patients with early stage HL. We excluded trials with more than 20% of patients in advanced stage. As the value of radiotherapy in addition to chemotherapy is still not clear, we also compared to more cycles of chemotherapy in the control arm. In this updated review, we also included a second comparison evaluating trials with varying numbers of cycles of chemotherapy between intervention and control arms, same chemotherapy regimen in both arms assumed. We excluded trials evaluating children only, therefore only trials involving adults are included in this updated review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the quality of trials. We contacted study authors to obtain missing information. As effect measures we used hazard ratios (HR) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and risk ratios (RR) for response rates. Since not all trials reported PFS according to our definitions, we evaluated all similar outcomes (e.g. event-free survival) as PFS/tumour control. MAIN RESULTS Our search led to 5518 potentially relevant references. From these, we included seven RCTs in the analyses involving 2564 patients. In contrast to the first version of this review including five trials, we excluded trials randomising children. As a result, we excluded one trial from the former analyses and we identified three new trials.Five trials with 1388 patients compared the combination of chemotherapy alone and chemotherapy plus radiotherapy, with the same number of chemotherapy cycles in both arms. The addition of radiotherapy to chemotherapy has probably little or no difference on OS (HR 0.48; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22 to 1.06; P = 0.07, moderate- quality evidence), however two included trials had potential other high risk of bias due to a high number of patients not receiving planned radiotherapy. After excluding these trials in a sensitivity analysis, the results showed that the combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy improved OS compared to chemotherapy alone (HR 0.31; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.52; P <0.00001, moderate- quality evidence). In contrast to chemotherapy alone the use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy improved PFS (HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.25 to 0.72; P = 0.001; moderate- quality evidence). Regarding infection- related mortality (RR 0.33; 95% CI 0.01 to 8.06; P = 0.5; low- quality evidence), second cancer- related mortality (RR 0.53; 95% CI 0.07 to 4.29; P = 0.55; low- quality evidence) and cardiac disease- related mortality (RR 2.94; 95% CI 0.31 to 27.55; P = 0.35;low- quality evidence), there is no evidence for a difference between the use of chemotherapy alone and chemotherapy plus radiotherapy. For complete response rate (CRR) (RR 1.08; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.25; P = 0.33; low- quality evidence), there is also no evidence for a difference between treatment groups.Two trials with 1176 patients compared the combination of chemotherapy alone and chemotherapy plus radiotherapy, with different numbers of chemotherapy cycles in both arms. OS is reported in one trial only, the use of chemotherapy alone (more chemotherapy cycles) may improve OS compared to chemotherapy plus radiotherapy (HR 2.12; 95% CI 1.03 to 4.37; P = 0.04; low- quality evidence). This trial also had a potential other high risk of bias due to a high number of patients not receiving planned therapy. There is no evidence for a difference between chemotherapy alone and chemotherapy plus radiotherapy regarding PFS (HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.14 to 1.24; P = 0.12; low- quality evidence). After excluding the trial with patients not receiving the planned therapy in a sensitivity analysis, the results showed that the combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy improved PFS compared to chemotherapy alone (HR 0.24; 95% CI 0.070 to 0.88; P = 0.03, based on one trial). For infection- related mortality (RR 6.90; 95% CI 0.36 to 132.34; P = 0.2; low- quality evidence), second cancer- related mortality (RR 2.22; 95% CI 0.7 to 7.03; P = 0.18; low- quality evidence) and cardiac disease-related mortality (RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.14 to 6.90; P = 0.99; low-quality evidence), there is no evidence for a difference between the use of chemotherapy alone and chemotherapy plus radiotherapy. CRR rate was not reported. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This systematic review compared the effects of chemotherapy alone and chemotherapy plus radiotherapy in adults with early stage HL .For the comparison with same numbers of chemotherapy cycles in both arms, we found moderate- quality evidence that PFS is superior in patients receiving chemotherapy plus radiotherapy than in those receiving chemotherapy alone. The addition of radiotherapy to chemotherapy has probably little or no difference on OS . The sensitivity analysis without the trials with potential other high risk of bias showed that chemotherapy plus radiotherapy improves OS compared to chemotherapy alone.For the comparison with different numbers of chemotherapy cycles between the arms there are no implications for OS and PFS possible, because of the low quality of evidence of the results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Blank
- University Hospital of CologneCochrane Haematological Malignancies Group, Department I of Internal MedicineKerpener Str. 62CologneGermany50937
| | - Bastian von Tresckow
- University Hospital of CologneDepartment I of Internal MedicineCologneGermany50931
| | - Ina Monsef
- University Hospital of CologneCochrane Haematological Malignancies Group, Department I of Internal MedicineKerpener Str. 62CologneGermany50937
| | - Lena Specht
- Rigshospitalet, University of CopenhagenDepts. of Oncology and HaematologyThe Finsen Centre9 BlegdamsvejCopenhagenDenmarkDK‐2100
| | - Andreas Engert
- University Hospital of CologneDepartment I of Internal MedicineCologneGermany50931
| | - Nicole Skoetz
- University Hospital of CologneCochrane Haematological Malignancies Group, Department I of Internal MedicineKerpener Str. 62CologneGermany50937
| | | |
Collapse
|
125
|
Pingali SR, Saliba RM, Anderlini P, Hosing C, Khouri I, Alousi AM, Nieto Y, Qazilbash MH, Champlin R, Popat UR. Age over Fifty-Five Years at Diagnosis Increases Risk of Second Malignancies after Autologous Transplantation for Patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2017; 23:1059-1063. [PMID: 28389254 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.03.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2016] [Accepted: 03/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The impact of age at diagnosis on outcomes of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) undergoing autologous hematopoietic transplantation (auto-HCT) is unclear. We retrospectively evaluated the impact of age on outcomes of 310 consecutive patients with relapsed/refractory HL who underwent auto-HCT between January 1996 and December 2010 with carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan conditioning therapy. Patients were stratified into ≤ 55 and >55-year-age groups based on age at diagnosis. At a median follow-up of 80 (range, 1 to 180) months, progression-free survival was similar between both age groups. However, age older than 55 years at diagnosis was associated with significantly poor overall survival with a hazard ratio [HR] of 2.3 (P = .003) from higher rate of second malignancies (HR, 3.8; P = .015) compared with patients 55 years or younger. In conclusion age > 55 years at diagnosis increases risk of second malignancies after auto-HCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rima M Saliba
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Houston, Texas
| | - Paolo Anderlini
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Houston, Texas
| | - Chitra Hosing
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Houston, Texas
| | - Issa Khouri
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Houston, Texas
| | - Amin M Alousi
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Houston, Texas
| | - Yago Nieto
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Houston, Texas
| | - Muzaffar H Qazilbash
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Houston, Texas
| | - Richard Champlin
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Houston, Texas
| | - Uday R Popat
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
126
|
Tadic M, Cuspidi C, Hering D, Venneri L, Grozdic-Milojevic I. Radiotherapy-induced right ventricular remodelling: The missing piece of the puzzle. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2017; 110:116-123. [DOI: 10.1016/j.acvd.2016.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2016] [Revised: 10/15/2016] [Accepted: 10/18/2016] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
127
|
Kwan A, Chadwick N, Hancock B. Improving Survival of Patients With Hodgkin Lymphoma Over 4 Decades: Experience of the British National Lymphoma Investigation (BNLI) With 6834 Patients. CLINICAL LYMPHOMA, MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA 2017; 17:108-119. [PMID: 28027894 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2016.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2016] [Revised: 10/30/2016] [Accepted: 11/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The management of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) has changed markedly over the last 50 years. This is due to the expanding understanding about the biology of the disease, the development of increasingly efficacious multimodal treatment, and the recognition of how to reduce late effects. The British National Lymphoma Investigation (BNLI) was formed in the 1970s to coordinate UK research in the diagnosis and treatment of lymphoma. We describe the improvement in trial patient survival over 4 decades. PATIENTS AND METHODS This analysis is of data on 6834 patients with a de novo diagnosis of HL registered onto studies with BNLI oversight from January 1, 1970, to December 31, 2009. Patients were subdivided in 4 groups according to their decade of registration; 1970s, 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s. Because of the lengthy data collection period, there is a difference in duration of follow-up between decade groups, with median follow-up in the 1970s group of 28.2 years, 18.0 years in the 1980s group, 9.4 years in the 1990s group, and 5.4 years in the 2000s group. Comparison between data in all 4 groups is not possible beyond 13.4 years (maximum duration of follow-up in the 2000s group), and so a cutoff has been applied at 14 years. Data on overall survival, cause of death, primary treatment modality, and incidence of secondary malignancy were collected. RESULTS Clear and statistically significant improvements in survival curves between the decades were present, with 10-year overall survival increasing from 62.4% in the 1970s to 89.6% in the 2000s. There was a suggestion that second malignancy and cardiac-related deaths have been reducing over time, but longer follow-up is needed for the later decades to confirm this trend. CONCLUSION Results support existing registry data demonstrating that survival for HL has improved over the 4 decades analyzed. This data set is robust and validated, and it adds valuable understanding to the reasons behind the survival curves, which are a balance between efficacious therapies and decreased death related to cardiac conditions and second malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Kwan
- Academic Unit of Clinical Oncology, University of Sheffield, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - Nick Chadwick
- Cancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | - Barry Hancock
- Academic Unit of Clinical Oncology, University of Sheffield, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
128
|
Herst J, Crump M, Baldassarre F, MacEachern J, Sussman J, Hodgson D, Cheung M. Management of Early-stage Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Practice Guideline. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2017; 29:e5-e12. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2016.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2016] [Revised: 07/28/2016] [Accepted: 08/02/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
129
|
McLaughlin M, Kelsey TW, Wallace WHB, Anderson RA, Telfer EE. Non-growing follicle density is increased following adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (ABVD) chemotherapy in the adult human ovary. Hum Reprod 2017; 32:165-174. [PMID: 27923859 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2016] [Revised: 08/23/2016] [Accepted: 09/19/2016] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Do the chemotherapeutic regimens of ABVD (adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine) or OEPA-COPDAC (combined vincristine, etoposide, prednisone, doxorubicin (OEPA) and cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, dacarbazine (COPDAC)) used to treat Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), affect the density, morphology and in vitro developmental potential of human ovarian follicles? SUMMARY ANSWER Ovarian tissue from women treated with ABVD contained a higher density of non-growing follicles (NGFs) per cubic millimetre and increased numbers of multiovular follicles but showed reduced in vitro growth compared with patients with lymphoma who had not received chemotherapy, patients treated with OEPA-COPDAC, age-matched healthy women and age-related model-predicted values. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Chemotherapy regimens can cause a loss of follicles within the ovary, which depends on the drugs given. Early stage HL is commonly treated by ABVD, a non-alkylating regimen that apparently has ovarian sparing qualities; thus it is important to investigate the histological appearance and distribution of follicles within ABVD-treated ovarian tissue. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Thirteen ovarian biopsies were obtained from HL patients (six adolescents and seven adults) and one biopsy from a non-HL patient. Two HL patients and the non-HL patient had received no treatment prior to biopsy collection. The remaining 11 HL patients received one of two regimens: ABVD or OEPA-COPDAC. Tissue was analysed histologically and compared to biopsies from healthy women, and in a subgroup of patients, tissue was cultured for 6 days in vitro. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Ovarian biopsies were obtained from patients undergoing ovarian cryopreservation for fertility preservation and from healthy women at the time of Caesarian section ('obstetric tissue'). Follicle number and maturity were evaluated in sections of ovarian cortical tissue, and compared to an age-related model of mean follicle density and to age-matched contemporaneous biopsies. The developmental potential of follicles was investigated after 6 days of tissue culture. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE A total of 6877 follicles were analysed. ABVD-treated tissue contained a higher density of NGFs per cubic millimetre (230 ± 17) (mean ± SEM) than untreated (110 ± 54), OEPA-COPDAC-treated (50 ± 27) and obstetric (20 ± 4) tissue (P < 0.01), with follicle density 9-21 SD higher than predicted by an age-related model. Biovular and binucleated NGFs occurred frequently in ABVD-treated and in adolescent-untreated tissue but were not observed in OEPA-COPDAC-treated or obstetric tissue, although OEPA-COPDAC-treated tissue contained a high proportion of morphologically abnormal oocytes (52% versus 23% in untreated, 22% in ABVD-treated and 25% in obstetric tissue; P < 0.001). Activation of follicle growth in vitro occurred in all groups, but in ABVD-treated samples there was very limited development to the secondary stage, whereas in untreated samples from lymphoma patients growth was similar to that observed in obstetric tissue (untreated; P < 0.01 versus ABVD-treated, NS versus obstetric). LARGE SCALE DATA N/A LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Although a large number of follicles were analysed, these data were derived from a small number of biopsies. The mechanisms underpinning these observations have yet to be determined and it is unclear how they relate to future fertility. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS This study confirms that the number of NGFs is not depleted following ABVD treatment, consistent with clinical data that female fertility is preserved. Our findings demonstrate that immature follicle density can increase as well as decrease following at least one chemotherapy treatment. This is the first report of morphological and follicle developmental similarities between ABVD-treated tissue and the immature human ovary. Further experiments will investigate the basis for the marked increase in follicle density in ABVD-treated tissue. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS Funded by UK Medical Research Council Grants G0901839 and MR/L00299X/1. The authors have no competing interests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M McLaughlin
- Centre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9XD, UK
- Institute of Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3BF, UK
| | - T W Kelsey
- School of Computer Science, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews KY16 9SX, UK
| | - W H B Wallace
- Department of Haematology/Oncology, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh EH9 1LF, UK
| | - R A Anderson
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK
| | - E E Telfer
- Centre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9XD, UK
- Institute of Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3BF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
130
|
Diefenbach CS, Connors JM, Friedberg JW, Leonard JP, Kahl BS, Little RF, Baizer L, Evens AM, Hoppe RT, Kelly KM, Persky DO, Younes A, Kostakaglu L, Bartlett NL. Hodgkin Lymphoma: Current Status and Clinical Trial Recommendations. J Natl Cancer Inst 2016; 109:2742050. [PMID: 28040700 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djw249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2016] [Revised: 06/24/2016] [Accepted: 09/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The National Clinical Trials Network lymphoid malignancies Clinical Trials Planning Meeting (CTPM) occurred in November of 2014. The scope of the CTPM was to prioritize across the lymphoid tumors clinically significant questions and to foster strategies leading to biologically informed and potentially practice changing clinical trials. This review from the Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) subcommittee of the CTPM discusses the ongoing clinical challenges in HL, outlines the current standard of care for HL patients from early to advanced stage, and surveys the current science with respect to biomarkers and the landscape of ongoing clinical trials. Finally, we suggest areas of unmet need in HL and elucidate promising therapeutic strategies to guide future HL clinical trials planning across the NCTN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine S Diefenbach
- Affiliations of authors: NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY (CSD); BC Cancer Agency Centre for Lymphoid Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada (JMC); Wilmot Cancer Center and Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (JWF); Department of Medicine, Weil Cornell University, New York, NY (JPL); Oncology Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO (BSK, NLB); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (RFL) and Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials (LB), Tufts Cancer Center and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (AME); Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University Medical School, Stanford, CA (RTH); Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/Stem Cell Transplant, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (KMK); Department of Medicine, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ (DOP); Lymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (AY); Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY (LK)
| | - Joseph M Connors
- Affiliations of authors: NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY (CSD); BC Cancer Agency Centre for Lymphoid Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada (JMC); Wilmot Cancer Center and Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (JWF); Department of Medicine, Weil Cornell University, New York, NY (JPL); Oncology Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO (BSK, NLB); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (RFL) and Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials (LB), Tufts Cancer Center and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (AME); Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University Medical School, Stanford, CA (RTH); Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/Stem Cell Transplant, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (KMK); Department of Medicine, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ (DOP); Lymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (AY); Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY (LK)
| | - Jonathan W Friedberg
- Affiliations of authors: NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY (CSD); BC Cancer Agency Centre for Lymphoid Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada (JMC); Wilmot Cancer Center and Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (JWF); Department of Medicine, Weil Cornell University, New York, NY (JPL); Oncology Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO (BSK, NLB); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (RFL) and Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials (LB), Tufts Cancer Center and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (AME); Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University Medical School, Stanford, CA (RTH); Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/Stem Cell Transplant, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (KMK); Department of Medicine, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ (DOP); Lymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (AY); Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY (LK)
| | - John P Leonard
- Affiliations of authors: NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY (CSD); BC Cancer Agency Centre for Lymphoid Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada (JMC); Wilmot Cancer Center and Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (JWF); Department of Medicine, Weil Cornell University, New York, NY (JPL); Oncology Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO (BSK, NLB); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (RFL) and Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials (LB), Tufts Cancer Center and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (AME); Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University Medical School, Stanford, CA (RTH); Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/Stem Cell Transplant, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (KMK); Department of Medicine, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ (DOP); Lymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (AY); Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY (LK)
| | - Brad S Kahl
- Affiliations of authors: NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY (CSD); BC Cancer Agency Centre for Lymphoid Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada (JMC); Wilmot Cancer Center and Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (JWF); Department of Medicine, Weil Cornell University, New York, NY (JPL); Oncology Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO (BSK, NLB); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (RFL) and Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials (LB), Tufts Cancer Center and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (AME); Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University Medical School, Stanford, CA (RTH); Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/Stem Cell Transplant, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (KMK); Department of Medicine, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ (DOP); Lymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (AY); Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY (LK)
| | - Richard F Little
- Affiliations of authors: NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY (CSD); BC Cancer Agency Centre for Lymphoid Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada (JMC); Wilmot Cancer Center and Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (JWF); Department of Medicine, Weil Cornell University, New York, NY (JPL); Oncology Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO (BSK, NLB); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (RFL) and Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials (LB), Tufts Cancer Center and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (AME); Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University Medical School, Stanford, CA (RTH); Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/Stem Cell Transplant, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (KMK); Department of Medicine, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ (DOP); Lymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (AY); Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY (LK)
| | - Lawrence Baizer
- Affiliations of authors: NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY (CSD); BC Cancer Agency Centre for Lymphoid Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada (JMC); Wilmot Cancer Center and Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (JWF); Department of Medicine, Weil Cornell University, New York, NY (JPL); Oncology Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO (BSK, NLB); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (RFL) and Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials (LB), Tufts Cancer Center and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (AME); Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University Medical School, Stanford, CA (RTH); Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/Stem Cell Transplant, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (KMK); Department of Medicine, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ (DOP); Lymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (AY); Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY (LK)
| | - Andrew M Evens
- Affiliations of authors: NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY (CSD); BC Cancer Agency Centre for Lymphoid Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada (JMC); Wilmot Cancer Center and Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (JWF); Department of Medicine, Weil Cornell University, New York, NY (JPL); Oncology Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO (BSK, NLB); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (RFL) and Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials (LB), Tufts Cancer Center and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (AME); Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University Medical School, Stanford, CA (RTH); Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/Stem Cell Transplant, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (KMK); Department of Medicine, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ (DOP); Lymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (AY); Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY (LK)
| | - Richard T Hoppe
- Affiliations of authors: NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY (CSD); BC Cancer Agency Centre for Lymphoid Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada (JMC); Wilmot Cancer Center and Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (JWF); Department of Medicine, Weil Cornell University, New York, NY (JPL); Oncology Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO (BSK, NLB); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (RFL) and Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials (LB), Tufts Cancer Center and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (AME); Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University Medical School, Stanford, CA (RTH); Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/Stem Cell Transplant, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (KMK); Department of Medicine, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ (DOP); Lymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (AY); Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY (LK)
| | - Kara M Kelly
- Affiliations of authors: NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY (CSD); BC Cancer Agency Centre for Lymphoid Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada (JMC); Wilmot Cancer Center and Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (JWF); Department of Medicine, Weil Cornell University, New York, NY (JPL); Oncology Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO (BSK, NLB); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (RFL) and Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials (LB), Tufts Cancer Center and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (AME); Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University Medical School, Stanford, CA (RTH); Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/Stem Cell Transplant, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (KMK); Department of Medicine, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ (DOP); Lymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (AY); Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY (LK)
| | - Daniel O Persky
- Affiliations of authors: NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY (CSD); BC Cancer Agency Centre for Lymphoid Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada (JMC); Wilmot Cancer Center and Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (JWF); Department of Medicine, Weil Cornell University, New York, NY (JPL); Oncology Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO (BSK, NLB); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (RFL) and Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials (LB), Tufts Cancer Center and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (AME); Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University Medical School, Stanford, CA (RTH); Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/Stem Cell Transplant, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (KMK); Department of Medicine, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ (DOP); Lymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (AY); Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY (LK)
| | - Anas Younes
- Affiliations of authors: NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY (CSD); BC Cancer Agency Centre for Lymphoid Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada (JMC); Wilmot Cancer Center and Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (JWF); Department of Medicine, Weil Cornell University, New York, NY (JPL); Oncology Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO (BSK, NLB); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (RFL) and Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials (LB), Tufts Cancer Center and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (AME); Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University Medical School, Stanford, CA (RTH); Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/Stem Cell Transplant, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (KMK); Department of Medicine, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ (DOP); Lymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (AY); Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY (LK)
| | - Lale Kostakaglu
- Affiliations of authors: NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY (CSD); BC Cancer Agency Centre for Lymphoid Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada (JMC); Wilmot Cancer Center and Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (JWF); Department of Medicine, Weil Cornell University, New York, NY (JPL); Oncology Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO (BSK, NLB); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (RFL) and Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials (LB), Tufts Cancer Center and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (AME); Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University Medical School, Stanford, CA (RTH); Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/Stem Cell Transplant, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (KMK); Department of Medicine, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ (DOP); Lymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (AY); Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY (LK)
| | - Nancy L Bartlett
- Affiliations of authors: NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY (CSD); BC Cancer Agency Centre for Lymphoid Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada (JMC); Wilmot Cancer Center and Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (JWF); Department of Medicine, Weil Cornell University, New York, NY (JPL); Oncology Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO (BSK, NLB); Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (RFL) and Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials (LB), Tufts Cancer Center and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (AME); Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University Medical School, Stanford, CA (RTH); Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/Stem Cell Transplant, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (KMK); Department of Medicine, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ (DOP); Lymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (AY); Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY (LK)
| |
Collapse
|
131
|
Zijlstra JM, Burggraaff CN, Kersten MJ, Barrington SF. FDG-PET as a biomarker for early response in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma as well as in Hodgkin lymphoma? Ready for implementation in clinical practice? Haematologica 2016; 101:1279-1283. [PMID: 27799345 PMCID: PMC5394882 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2016.142752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Josée M Zijlstra
- Department of Hematology, VU University medical center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
132
|
Ali S, Basit A, Kazmi AS, Sidhu A, Badar F, Hameed A. Chemotherapy alone or combined chemotherapy and involved field radiotherapy in favorable risk early-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma-a 10 years experience. Pak J Med Sci 2016; 32:1408-1413. [PMID: 28083035 PMCID: PMC5216291 DOI: 10.12669/pjms.326.11080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2016] [Accepted: 10/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the outcome of patients with early-stage (stage I-II) favorable risk classical Hodgkin lymphoma treated with chemotherapy alone or combined modality treatment (CMT) utilizing chemotherapy and involved field radiotherapy. METHODS This retrospective study was done at Department of Medical oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan from January 2004 to December 2013. RESULTS There were 101 patients, with male predominance (71.3%). Mean age was 34 years. Sixty three (62.4%) patients received CMT and 38 (37.6%) patients had chemotherapy alone. Ninety eight percent patients had ABVD chemotherapy. Dose of radiotherapy ranged from 20 to 36 gray. Difference between baseline characteristics and major toxicities among the two groups was insignificant. Patients treated with CMT had better overall survival compared to chemotherapy alone: 100% versus 91% at five years and 96% versus 81% at 10 years, respectively (p=0.03). Progression free survival was also better with CMT against chemotherapy alone at five years (98% versus 81%) and 10 years (82% versus 71%) (p=0.01). CONCLUSION Favorable risk classical Hodgkin lymphoma patients had better overall survival and progression free survival when treated with CMT against chemotherapy alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheeraz Ali
- Dr. Sheeraz Ali, MBBS, FCPS (Medicine), Fellow Medical Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Abdul Basit
- Dr. Abdul Basit, MBBS, FCPS (Medicine), Fellow Medical Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Ather S. Kazmi
- Dr. Ather Saeed Kazmi, MBBS, MRCP FRCR. Clinical Oncologist, Department of Medical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Armughan Sidhu
- Dr. Farhana Badar, Sr. Biostatistician & Cancer Epidemiologist Cancer Registry, & Clinical Data Management, Department of Cancer Registry and Clinical Data Management, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Farhana Badar
- Dr. Armughan Sidhu, MBBS. Resident Medical Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Abdul Hameed
- Dr. Abdul Hameed MBBS, MD, FRCP (Edin). Consultant Hematologist, Department of Medical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
133
|
Wright CL, Maly JJ, Zhang J, Knopp MV. Advancing Precision Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging for Lymphoma. PET Clin 2016; 12:63-82. [PMID: 27863567 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2016.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PET with fluorodeoxyglucose F 18 (18F FDG-PET) is a meaningful biomarker for the detection, targeted biopsy, and treatment of lymphoma. This article reviews the evolution of 18F FDG-PET as a putative biomarker for lymphoma and addresses the current capabilities, challenges, and opportunities to enable precision medicine practices for lymphoma. Precision nuclear medicine is driven by new imaging technologies and methodologies to more accurately detect malignant disease. Although quantitative assessment of response is limited, such technologies will enable a more precise metabolic mapping with much higher definition image detail and thus may make it a robust and valid quantitative response assessment methodology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chadwick L Wright
- Wright Center of Innovation in Biomedical Imaging, Division of Imaging Science, Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 West 12th Avenue, Room 430, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Joseph J Maly
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Starling Loving Hall 406C, 320 West 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Jun Zhang
- Wright Center of Innovation in Biomedical Imaging, Division of Imaging Science, Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 West 12th Avenue, Room 430, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Michael V Knopp
- Wright Center of Innovation in Biomedical Imaging, Division of Imaging Science, Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 West 12th Avenue, Room 430, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
134
|
|
135
|
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Hodgkin Lymphoma—Unfavorable Clinical Stage I and II. Am J Clin Oncol 2016; 39:384-95. [DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
136
|
Hapgood G, Zheng Y, Sehn LH, Villa D, Klasa R, Gerrie AS, Shenkier T, Scott DW, Gascoyne RD, Slack GW, Parsons C, Morris J, Pickles T, Connors JM, Savage KJ. Evaluation of the Risk of Relapse in Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma at Event-Free Survival Time Points and Survival Comparison With the General Population in British Columbia. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:2493-500. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.65.4194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Studies in classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) typically measure the time to events from diagnosis. We evaluated the risk of relapse at event-free survival time points in cHL and compared the risk of death to expected mortality rates in British Columbia (BC). Methods The BC Cancer Agency Lymphoid Cancer Database was screened to identify all patients age 16 to 69 years diagnosed with cHL between 1989 and 2012 treated with the chemotherapy regimen of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (or equivalent). We compared the observed mortality to the general population using age-, sex-, and calendar period–generated expected mortality rates from BC life-tables. Relative survival was calculated using a conditional approach and expressed as a standardized mortality ratio of observed-to-expected deaths. Results One thousand four hundred two patients were identified; 749 patients were male (53%), the median age was 32 years, and 68% had advanced-stage disease. The median follow-up time was 8.4 years. Seventy-two percent of relapses occurred within the first 2 years of diagnosis. For all patients, the 5-year risk of relapse from diagnosis was 18.1% but diminished to 5.6% for patients remaining event free at 2 years. For advanced-stage patients who were event free at 2 years, the 5-year risk of relapse was only 7.6%, and for those who were event free at 3 years, it was comparable to that of limited-stage patients (4.1% v 2.5%, respectively; P = .07). Furthermore, international prognostic score ≥ 4 and bulky disease were no longer prognostic in patients who were event free at 1 year. Although the relative survival improved as patients remained in remission, it did not normalize compared with the general population. Conclusion Patients with cHL who are event free at 2 years have an excellent outcome regardless of baseline prognostic factors. All patients with cHL had an enduring increased risk of death compared with the general population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greg Hapgood
- Greg Hapgood, Laurie H. Sehn, Diego Villa, Richard Klasa, Alina S. Gerrie, Tamara Shenkier, David W. Scott, Randy D. Gascoyne, Graham W. Slack, Joseph M. Connors, and Kerry J. Savage, British Columbia Cancer Agency Centre for Lymphoid Cancer; Yvonne Zheng, Cancer Surveillance and Outcomes, Population Oncology; Christina Parsons, James Morris, and Tom Pickles, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Yvonne Zheng
- Greg Hapgood, Laurie H. Sehn, Diego Villa, Richard Klasa, Alina S. Gerrie, Tamara Shenkier, David W. Scott, Randy D. Gascoyne, Graham W. Slack, Joseph M. Connors, and Kerry J. Savage, British Columbia Cancer Agency Centre for Lymphoid Cancer; Yvonne Zheng, Cancer Surveillance and Outcomes, Population Oncology; Christina Parsons, James Morris, and Tom Pickles, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Laurie H. Sehn
- Greg Hapgood, Laurie H. Sehn, Diego Villa, Richard Klasa, Alina S. Gerrie, Tamara Shenkier, David W. Scott, Randy D. Gascoyne, Graham W. Slack, Joseph M. Connors, and Kerry J. Savage, British Columbia Cancer Agency Centre for Lymphoid Cancer; Yvonne Zheng, Cancer Surveillance and Outcomes, Population Oncology; Christina Parsons, James Morris, and Tom Pickles, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Diego Villa
- Greg Hapgood, Laurie H. Sehn, Diego Villa, Richard Klasa, Alina S. Gerrie, Tamara Shenkier, David W. Scott, Randy D. Gascoyne, Graham W. Slack, Joseph M. Connors, and Kerry J. Savage, British Columbia Cancer Agency Centre for Lymphoid Cancer; Yvonne Zheng, Cancer Surveillance and Outcomes, Population Oncology; Christina Parsons, James Morris, and Tom Pickles, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Richard Klasa
- Greg Hapgood, Laurie H. Sehn, Diego Villa, Richard Klasa, Alina S. Gerrie, Tamara Shenkier, David W. Scott, Randy D. Gascoyne, Graham W. Slack, Joseph M. Connors, and Kerry J. Savage, British Columbia Cancer Agency Centre for Lymphoid Cancer; Yvonne Zheng, Cancer Surveillance and Outcomes, Population Oncology; Christina Parsons, James Morris, and Tom Pickles, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alina S. Gerrie
- Greg Hapgood, Laurie H. Sehn, Diego Villa, Richard Klasa, Alina S. Gerrie, Tamara Shenkier, David W. Scott, Randy D. Gascoyne, Graham W. Slack, Joseph M. Connors, and Kerry J. Savage, British Columbia Cancer Agency Centre for Lymphoid Cancer; Yvonne Zheng, Cancer Surveillance and Outcomes, Population Oncology; Christina Parsons, James Morris, and Tom Pickles, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Tamara Shenkier
- Greg Hapgood, Laurie H. Sehn, Diego Villa, Richard Klasa, Alina S. Gerrie, Tamara Shenkier, David W. Scott, Randy D. Gascoyne, Graham W. Slack, Joseph M. Connors, and Kerry J. Savage, British Columbia Cancer Agency Centre for Lymphoid Cancer; Yvonne Zheng, Cancer Surveillance and Outcomes, Population Oncology; Christina Parsons, James Morris, and Tom Pickles, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - David W. Scott
- Greg Hapgood, Laurie H. Sehn, Diego Villa, Richard Klasa, Alina S. Gerrie, Tamara Shenkier, David W. Scott, Randy D. Gascoyne, Graham W. Slack, Joseph M. Connors, and Kerry J. Savage, British Columbia Cancer Agency Centre for Lymphoid Cancer; Yvonne Zheng, Cancer Surveillance and Outcomes, Population Oncology; Christina Parsons, James Morris, and Tom Pickles, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Randy D. Gascoyne
- Greg Hapgood, Laurie H. Sehn, Diego Villa, Richard Klasa, Alina S. Gerrie, Tamara Shenkier, David W. Scott, Randy D. Gascoyne, Graham W. Slack, Joseph M. Connors, and Kerry J. Savage, British Columbia Cancer Agency Centre for Lymphoid Cancer; Yvonne Zheng, Cancer Surveillance and Outcomes, Population Oncology; Christina Parsons, James Morris, and Tom Pickles, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Graham W. Slack
- Greg Hapgood, Laurie H. Sehn, Diego Villa, Richard Klasa, Alina S. Gerrie, Tamara Shenkier, David W. Scott, Randy D. Gascoyne, Graham W. Slack, Joseph M. Connors, and Kerry J. Savage, British Columbia Cancer Agency Centre for Lymphoid Cancer; Yvonne Zheng, Cancer Surveillance and Outcomes, Population Oncology; Christina Parsons, James Morris, and Tom Pickles, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Christina Parsons
- Greg Hapgood, Laurie H. Sehn, Diego Villa, Richard Klasa, Alina S. Gerrie, Tamara Shenkier, David W. Scott, Randy D. Gascoyne, Graham W. Slack, Joseph M. Connors, and Kerry J. Savage, British Columbia Cancer Agency Centre for Lymphoid Cancer; Yvonne Zheng, Cancer Surveillance and Outcomes, Population Oncology; Christina Parsons, James Morris, and Tom Pickles, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - James Morris
- Greg Hapgood, Laurie H. Sehn, Diego Villa, Richard Klasa, Alina S. Gerrie, Tamara Shenkier, David W. Scott, Randy D. Gascoyne, Graham W. Slack, Joseph M. Connors, and Kerry J. Savage, British Columbia Cancer Agency Centre for Lymphoid Cancer; Yvonne Zheng, Cancer Surveillance and Outcomes, Population Oncology; Christina Parsons, James Morris, and Tom Pickles, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Tom Pickles
- Greg Hapgood, Laurie H. Sehn, Diego Villa, Richard Klasa, Alina S. Gerrie, Tamara Shenkier, David W. Scott, Randy D. Gascoyne, Graham W. Slack, Joseph M. Connors, and Kerry J. Savage, British Columbia Cancer Agency Centre for Lymphoid Cancer; Yvonne Zheng, Cancer Surveillance and Outcomes, Population Oncology; Christina Parsons, James Morris, and Tom Pickles, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Joseph M. Connors
- Greg Hapgood, Laurie H. Sehn, Diego Villa, Richard Klasa, Alina S. Gerrie, Tamara Shenkier, David W. Scott, Randy D. Gascoyne, Graham W. Slack, Joseph M. Connors, and Kerry J. Savage, British Columbia Cancer Agency Centre for Lymphoid Cancer; Yvonne Zheng, Cancer Surveillance and Outcomes, Population Oncology; Christina Parsons, James Morris, and Tom Pickles, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kerry J. Savage
- Greg Hapgood, Laurie H. Sehn, Diego Villa, Richard Klasa, Alina S. Gerrie, Tamara Shenkier, David W. Scott, Randy D. Gascoyne, Graham W. Slack, Joseph M. Connors, and Kerry J. Savage, British Columbia Cancer Agency Centre for Lymphoid Cancer; Yvonne Zheng, Cancer Surveillance and Outcomes, Population Oncology; Christina Parsons, James Morris, and Tom Pickles, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
137
|
Kumar A, Burger IA, Zhang Z, Drill EN, Migliacci JC, Ng A, LaCasce A, Wall D, Witzig TE, Ristow K, Yahalom J, Moskowitz CH, Zelenetz AD. Definition of bulky disease in early stage Hodgkin lymphoma in computed tomography era: prognostic significance of measurements in the coronal and transverse planes. Haematologica 2016; 101:1237-1243. [PMID: 27390360 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2016.141846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2016] [Accepted: 07/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Disease bulk is an important prognostic factor in early stage Hodgkin lymphoma, but its definition is unclear in the computed tomography era. This retrospective analysis investigated the prognostic significance of bulky disease measured in transverse and coronal planes on computed tomography imaging. Early stage Hodgkin lymphoma patients (n=185) treated with chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy from 2000-2010 were included. The longest diameter of the largest lymph node mass was measured in transverse and coronal axes on pre-treatment imaging. The optimal cut off for disease bulk was maximal diameter greater than 7 cm measured in either the transverse or coronal plane. Thirty patients with maximal transverse diameter of 7 cm or under were found to have bulk in coronal axis. The 4-year overall survival was 96.5% (CI: 93.3%, 100%) and 4-year relapse-free survival was 86.8% (CI: 81.9%, 92.1%) for all patients. Relapse-free survival at four years for bulky patients was 80.5% (CI: 73%, 88.9%) compared to 94.4% (CI: 89.1%, 100%) for non-bulky; Cox HR 4.21 (CI: 1.43, 12.38) (P=0.004). In bulky patients, relapse-free survival was not impacted in patients treated with chemoradiotherapy; however, it was significantly lower in patients treated with chemotherapy alone. In an independent validation cohort of 38 patients treated with chemotherapy alone, patients with bulky disease had an inferior relapse-free survival [at 4 years, 71.1% (CI: 52.1%, 97%) vs 94.1% (CI: 83.6%, 100%), Cox HR 5.27 (CI: 0.62, 45.16); P=0.09]. Presence of bulky disease on multidimensional computed tomography imaging is a significant prognostic factor in early stage Hodgkin lymphoma. Coronal reformations may be included for routine Hodgkin lymphoma staging evaluation. In future, our definition of disease bulk may be useful in identifying patients who are most appropriate for chemotherapy alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita Kumar
- Lymphoma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Irene A Burger
- Department Medical Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Zhigang Zhang
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Esther N Drill
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jocelyn C Migliacci
- Lymphoma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrea Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ann LaCasce
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Darci Wall
- Department of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Kay Ristow
- Department of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Joachim Yahalom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Craig H Moskowitz
- Lymphoma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew D Zelenetz
- Lymphoma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
138
|
Bröckelmann PJ, Angelopoulou MK, Vassilakopoulos TP. Prognostic factors in Hodgkin lymphoma. Semin Hematol 2016; 53:155-64. [DOI: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2016.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
139
|
Bhatt VR, Giri S, Verma V, Dahal S, Shah BK, Pathak R, Bociek RG, Vose JM, Armitage JO. Secondary acute myeloid leukemia in survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma. Future Oncol 2016; 12:1565-75. [DOI: 10.2217/fon-2016-0048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
|
140
|
Ansell SM. Hodgkin lymphoma: 2016 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol 2016; 91:434-42. [PMID: 27001163 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.24272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2015] [Accepted: 12/03/2015] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
DISEASE OVERVIEW Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is an uncommon B-cell lymphoid malignancy affecting 9,050 new patients annually and representing approximately 11.2% of all lymphomas in the United States. DIAGNOSIS HL is composed of two distinct disease entities; the more commonly diagnosed classical HL and the rare nodular lymphocyte predominant HL. Nodular sclerosis, mixed cellularity, lymphocyte depletion, and lymphocyte-rich HL are subgroups under the designation of classical HL. RISK STRATIFICATION An accurate assessment of the stage of disease in patients with HL is critical for the selection of the appropriate therapy. Prognostic models that identify patients at low or high risk for recurrence, as well as the response to therapy as determined by positron emission tomography (PET) scan, are used to optimize therapy. RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY Initial therapy for HL patients is based on the histology of the disease, the anatomical stage and the presence of poor prognostic features. Patients with early stage disease are typically treated with combined modality strategies utilizing abbreviated courses of combination chemotherapy followed by involved-field radiation therapy, while those with advanced stage disease receive a longer course of chemotherapy often without radiation therapy. Management of relapsed/refractory disease: High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by an autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is the standard of care for most patients who relapse following initial therapy. For patients who fail HDCT with ASCT, brentuximab vedotin, PD-1 blockade, nonmyeloablative allogeneic transplant or participation in a clinical trial should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen M. Ansell
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905
| |
Collapse
|
141
|
Abstract
Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) is a relatively rare disease accounting for 15 % of all lymphoma. This disease has developed from an incurable disease to the adult malignancy with the most favorable prognosis. With current therapeutic approaches consisting of polychemo- and small-field radiotherapy, up to 80 % of all patients can be cured long term. In refractory or relapsed HL, intensified treatment including high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is associated with progression-free survival (PFS) of 50 %. Evaluation of novel drugs in multiple relapsed or refractory cases, better treatment options for elderly patients and reducing treatment-related side effects are the main focus of current research. Recent clinical developments and future approaches in the treatment of HL will be discussed in this review.
Collapse
|
142
|
Hodgkin Lymphoma: the Changing Role of Radiation Therapy in Early-Stage Disease—the Role of Functional Imaging. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2016; 16:45. [PMID: 26187795 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-015-0360-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Early-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL) is a highly curable malignancy. Historically, extended-field radiotherapy (EFRT) alone showed excellent cure rates, but the risk of radiotherapy (RT)-associated toxicities led to combined modality therapy (CMT) replacing RT alone. RT has subsequently evolved further with significant reductions of dose and field size, and is currently restricted to involved sites only (ISRT). Contemporary CMT yields cure rates in excess of 85%, and most studies do not have adequate follow-up required to evaluate the risk reduction in late effects. In an effort to avoid RT altogether, response-adapted treatment approaches utilizing results of interim [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography with fused computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging have been studied. Results from two studies in favorable-risk (UK RAPID and EORTC H10F) and one in unfavorable-risk patients (EORTC H10U) suggest that omission of RT in patients with a negative interim PET/CT response (Deauville score ≤2) yields slightly inferior progression-free survival (PFS) compared to conventional CMT, but with no difference in overall survival (OS) albeit with short-term follow-up. In order to extrapolate results to daily practice, it is critical to understand the selection of patients entered on trials since definitions of favorable and unfavorable disease vary between study groups. Currently, CMT continues to be the standard of care for the vast majority of patients with early-stage CHL and RT is an integral part of therapy in patients with bulky disease. However, for selected patients with favorable characteristics, emerging data suggest that a chemotherapy-alone approach is reasonable.
Collapse
|
143
|
Merli F, Luminari S, Gobbi PG, Cascavilla N, Mammi C, Ilariucci F, Stelitano C, Musso M, Baldini L, Galimberti S, Angrilli F, Polimeno G, Scalzulli PR, Ferrari A, Marcheselli L, Federico M. Long-Term Results of the HD2000 Trial Comparing ABVD Versus BEACOPP Versus COPP-EBV-CAD in Untreated Patients With Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Study by Fondazione Italiana Linfomi. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:1175-81. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.62.4817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The randomized HD2000 trial compared six cycles of ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine), four escalated plus two standard cycles of BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone), and six cycles of COPP-EBV-CAD (cyclophosphamide, lomustine, vindesine, melphalan, prednisone, epidoxorubicin, vincristine, procarbazine, vinblastine, and bleomycin; CEC) in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. After a median follow-up of 42 months, patients who received BEACOPP were reported to have experienced better progression-free survival (PFS) but not better overall survival (OS) results than those receiving ABVD. We here report a post hoc analysis of this trial after a median follow-up of 10 years. Patients and Methods Three hundred seven patients were enrolled, 295 of whom were evaluable. At the time of our analysis, the median follow-up for the entire group was 120 months (range, 4 to 169 months). Results The 10-year PFS results for the ABVD, BEACOPP, and CEC arms were 69%, 75%, and 76%, respectively; corresponding OS results were 85%, 84%, and 86%. Overall, 13 second malignancies were reported: one in the ABVD arm and six each in the BEACOPP and CEC arms. The cumulative risk of developing second malignancies at 10 years was 0.9%, 6.6%, and 6% with ABVD, BEACOPP, and CEC, respectively; the risk with either BEACOPP or CEC was significantly higher than that reported with ABVD (P = .027 and .02, respectively). Conclusion With these mature results, we confirm that patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma have similar OS results when treated with ABVD, BEACOPP, or CEC. However, with longer follow-up, we were not able to confirm the superiority of BEACOPP over ABVD in terms of PFS, mainly because of higher mortality rates resulting from second malignancies observed after treatment with BEACOPP and CEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Merli
- Francesco Merli, Caterina Mammi, Fiorella Ilariucci, and Angela Ferrari, Azienda Ospedaliera Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS); Reggio Emilia; Stefano Luminari, Luigi Marcheselli, and Massimo Federico, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena; Paolo G. Gobbi, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia; Nicola Cascavilla and Potito Rosario Scalzulli, IRCCS “Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza” Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo
| | - Stefano Luminari
- Francesco Merli, Caterina Mammi, Fiorella Ilariucci, and Angela Ferrari, Azienda Ospedaliera Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS); Reggio Emilia; Stefano Luminari, Luigi Marcheselli, and Massimo Federico, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena; Paolo G. Gobbi, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia; Nicola Cascavilla and Potito Rosario Scalzulli, IRCCS “Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza” Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo
| | - Paolo G. Gobbi
- Francesco Merli, Caterina Mammi, Fiorella Ilariucci, and Angela Ferrari, Azienda Ospedaliera Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS); Reggio Emilia; Stefano Luminari, Luigi Marcheselli, and Massimo Federico, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena; Paolo G. Gobbi, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia; Nicola Cascavilla and Potito Rosario Scalzulli, IRCCS “Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza” Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo
| | - Nicola Cascavilla
- Francesco Merli, Caterina Mammi, Fiorella Ilariucci, and Angela Ferrari, Azienda Ospedaliera Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS); Reggio Emilia; Stefano Luminari, Luigi Marcheselli, and Massimo Federico, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena; Paolo G. Gobbi, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia; Nicola Cascavilla and Potito Rosario Scalzulli, IRCCS “Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza” Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo
| | - Caterina Mammi
- Francesco Merli, Caterina Mammi, Fiorella Ilariucci, and Angela Ferrari, Azienda Ospedaliera Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS); Reggio Emilia; Stefano Luminari, Luigi Marcheselli, and Massimo Federico, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena; Paolo G. Gobbi, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia; Nicola Cascavilla and Potito Rosario Scalzulli, IRCCS “Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza” Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo
| | - Fiorella Ilariucci
- Francesco Merli, Caterina Mammi, Fiorella Ilariucci, and Angela Ferrari, Azienda Ospedaliera Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS); Reggio Emilia; Stefano Luminari, Luigi Marcheselli, and Massimo Federico, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena; Paolo G. Gobbi, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia; Nicola Cascavilla and Potito Rosario Scalzulli, IRCCS “Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza” Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo
| | - Caterina Stelitano
- Francesco Merli, Caterina Mammi, Fiorella Ilariucci, and Angela Ferrari, Azienda Ospedaliera Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS); Reggio Emilia; Stefano Luminari, Luigi Marcheselli, and Massimo Federico, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena; Paolo G. Gobbi, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia; Nicola Cascavilla and Potito Rosario Scalzulli, IRCCS “Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza” Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo
| | - Maurizio Musso
- Francesco Merli, Caterina Mammi, Fiorella Ilariucci, and Angela Ferrari, Azienda Ospedaliera Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS); Reggio Emilia; Stefano Luminari, Luigi Marcheselli, and Massimo Federico, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena; Paolo G. Gobbi, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia; Nicola Cascavilla and Potito Rosario Scalzulli, IRCCS “Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza” Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo
| | - Luca Baldini
- Francesco Merli, Caterina Mammi, Fiorella Ilariucci, and Angela Ferrari, Azienda Ospedaliera Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS); Reggio Emilia; Stefano Luminari, Luigi Marcheselli, and Massimo Federico, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena; Paolo G. Gobbi, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia; Nicola Cascavilla and Potito Rosario Scalzulli, IRCCS “Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza” Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo
| | - Sara Galimberti
- Francesco Merli, Caterina Mammi, Fiorella Ilariucci, and Angela Ferrari, Azienda Ospedaliera Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS); Reggio Emilia; Stefano Luminari, Luigi Marcheselli, and Massimo Federico, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena; Paolo G. Gobbi, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia; Nicola Cascavilla and Potito Rosario Scalzulli, IRCCS “Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza” Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo
| | - Francesco Angrilli
- Francesco Merli, Caterina Mammi, Fiorella Ilariucci, and Angela Ferrari, Azienda Ospedaliera Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS); Reggio Emilia; Stefano Luminari, Luigi Marcheselli, and Massimo Federico, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena; Paolo G. Gobbi, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia; Nicola Cascavilla and Potito Rosario Scalzulli, IRCCS “Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza” Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo
| | - Giuseppe Polimeno
- Francesco Merli, Caterina Mammi, Fiorella Ilariucci, and Angela Ferrari, Azienda Ospedaliera Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS); Reggio Emilia; Stefano Luminari, Luigi Marcheselli, and Massimo Federico, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena; Paolo G. Gobbi, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia; Nicola Cascavilla and Potito Rosario Scalzulli, IRCCS “Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza” Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo
| | - Potito Rosario Scalzulli
- Francesco Merli, Caterina Mammi, Fiorella Ilariucci, and Angela Ferrari, Azienda Ospedaliera Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS); Reggio Emilia; Stefano Luminari, Luigi Marcheselli, and Massimo Federico, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena; Paolo G. Gobbi, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia; Nicola Cascavilla and Potito Rosario Scalzulli, IRCCS “Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza” Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo
| | - Angela Ferrari
- Francesco Merli, Caterina Mammi, Fiorella Ilariucci, and Angela Ferrari, Azienda Ospedaliera Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS); Reggio Emilia; Stefano Luminari, Luigi Marcheselli, and Massimo Federico, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena; Paolo G. Gobbi, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia; Nicola Cascavilla and Potito Rosario Scalzulli, IRCCS “Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza” Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo
| | - Luigi Marcheselli
- Francesco Merli, Caterina Mammi, Fiorella Ilariucci, and Angela Ferrari, Azienda Ospedaliera Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS); Reggio Emilia; Stefano Luminari, Luigi Marcheselli, and Massimo Federico, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena; Paolo G. Gobbi, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia; Nicola Cascavilla and Potito Rosario Scalzulli, IRCCS “Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza” Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo
| | - Massimo Federico
- Francesco Merli, Caterina Mammi, Fiorella Ilariucci, and Angela Ferrari, Azienda Ospedaliera Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS); Reggio Emilia; Stefano Luminari, Luigi Marcheselli, and Massimo Federico, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena; Paolo G. Gobbi, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia; Nicola Cascavilla and Potito Rosario Scalzulli, IRCCS “Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza” Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo
| |
Collapse
|
144
|
Coyle M, Kostakoglu L, Evens AM. The evolving role of response-adapted PET imaging in Hodgkin lymphoma. Ther Adv Hematol 2016; 7:108-25. [PMID: 27054026 DOI: 10.1177/2040620715625615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
(18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with (FDG-PET) has a well-established role in the pre- and post-treatment staging of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), however its use as a predictive therapeutic tool via responded-adapted therapy continues to evolve. There have been a multitude of retrospective and noncontrolled clinical studies showing that early (or interim) FDG-PET is highly prognostic in HL, particularly in the advanced-stage setting. Response-adapted treatment approaches in HL are attempting to diminish toxicity for low-risk patients by minimizing therapy, and conversely, intensify treatment for high-risk patients. Results from phase III noninferiority studies in early-stage HL with negative interim FDG-PET that randomized patients to chemotherapy alone versus combined modality therapy showed a continued small improvement in progression-free survival for patients who did not receive radiation. Preliminary reports of data escalating therapy for positive interim FDG-PET in early-stage HL and for de-escalation of therapy [i.e. bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine and prednisone (BEACOPP)] for negative interim FDG-PET in advanced stage HL (i.e. deletion of bleomycin) have demonstrated improved outcomes. Maturation of these studies and continued follow up of all response-adapted studies are needed. Altogether, the treatment of HL remains an individualized clinical management choice for physicians and patients. Continued refinement and optimization of FDG-PET is needed, including within the context of targeted therapeutic agents. In addition, a number of new and novel techniques of functional imaging, including metabolic tumor volume and tumor proliferation, are being explored in order to enhance staging, characterization, prognostication and ultimately patient outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lale Kostakoglu
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York, New York, USA
| | - Andrew M Evens
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Director, Tufts Cancer Center, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street, Box #245, Boston, MA 02111, USA
| |
Collapse
|
145
|
Rosa GM, Gigli L, Tagliasacchi MI, Di Iorio C, Carbone F, Nencioni A, Montecucco F, Brunelli C. Update on cardiotoxicity of anti-cancer treatments. Eur J Clin Invest 2016; 46:264-284. [PMID: 26728634 DOI: 10.1111/eci.12589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2015] [Accepted: 12/30/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Anti-cancer treatments markedly improved the prognosis of patients, but unfortunately might be hampered by cardiotoxicity. Both symptomatic and asymptomatic clinical forms of heart failure have been reported, which may be reversible or irreversible. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the antineoplastic agents associated with cardiac toxicity and of the available diagnostic techniques. METHODS AND METHODS This narrative review is based on material from MEDLINE and PUBMED up to November 2015. We looked at the terms antineoplastic drugs and cardiac toxicity in combination with echocardiography, troponins, cardiac magnetic resonance, and positron emission tomography. RESULTS Anthracyclines, monoclonal antibodies, fluoropyrimidines, taxanes, alkylating agents, vinka alkaloids were reported to induce different clinical manifestations of cardioxicity. Chest radiotherapy is also associated with various forms of cardiac damage, which are indistinguishable from those found in patients with heart disease of other aetiologies and that may even appear several years after administration. Among diagnostic techniques, echocardiography is a noninvasive, cost-effective, and widely available imaging tool. Nuclear imaging and cardiac magnetic resonance may be used but are not so widely available and are more difficult to perform. Finally, some biomarkers, such as troponins, may be used to evaluate cardiac damage, but establishing the optimal timing of troponin assessment remains unclear and defining the cut-off point for positivity is still an important goal. CONCLUSIONS Cardiotoxicity of anti-cancer treatments is associated with development of heart failure. Novel diagnostic tools might be relevant to early recognize irreversible forms cardiac diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gian Marco Rosa
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa - IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino - IST Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Gigli
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa - IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino - IST Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa, Italy
| | - Maria Isabella Tagliasacchi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa - IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino - IST Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa, Italy
| | - Cecilia Di Iorio
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa - IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino - IST Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa, Italy
| | - Federico Carbone
- Division of Cardiology, Foundation for Medical Researches, Department of Medical Specialties, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alessio Nencioni
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino-IST, Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca Sul Cancro, Genoa, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Montecucco
- Division of Cardiology, Foundation for Medical Researches, Department of Medical Specialties, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
- First Clinic of Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa - IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino-IST Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa, Italy
| | - Claudio Brunelli
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa - IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino - IST Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
146
|
Hodgkin lymphoma: an Australian experience of ABVD chemotherapy in the modern era. Ann Hematol 2016; 95:809-16. [DOI: 10.1007/s00277-016-2611-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2015] [Accepted: 02/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
147
|
Maraldo MV, Ng AK. Minimizing Cardiac Risks With Contemporary Radiation Therapy for Hodgkin Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:208-10. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.64.6588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrea K. Ng
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
148
|
Bhuller KS, Zhang Y, Li D, Sehn LH, Goddard K, McBride ML, Rogers PC. Late mortality, secondary malignancy and hospitalisation in teenage and young adult survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma: report of the Childhood/Adolescent/Young Adult Cancer Survivors Research Program and the BC Cancer Agency Centre for Lymphoid Cancer. Br J Haematol 2016; 172:757-68. [PMID: 26727959 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.13903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2015] [Accepted: 10/30/2015] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Late complications affecting Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors are well described in paediatric and adult-based publications. This study determined the late morbidity and mortality risk for 442 teenage and young adult (TYAs) 5-year HL survivors, diagnosed at 15-24 years of age between 1970 and 1999, identified from the British Columbia Cancer Registry. Treatment details were abstracted from charts. Survivors and a matched comparison cohort were linked to provincial administrative health datasets until December 2006 and regression analysis was performed, providing risk ratios regarding mortality, secondary malignancy and morbidity causing hospitalisation. Sixty (13·6%) survivors experienced late mortality with excess deaths from secondary cancer [standardised mortality ratio (SMR) 18·6; 95% confidence interval (CI) 11-29·4] and non-malignant disease (SMR 3·6; 95% CI 2·2-5·5). Excess secondary cancers (standardised incidence ratio 7·8; 95% CI 5·6-10·5) were associated with radiotherapy [Hazard ratio (HR) 2·7; 95% CI 1-7·7] and female gender (HR 1·8; 95% CI 1-3·4). Of 281 survivors treated between 1981 and 1999, 143 (51%) had morbidity resulting in hospitalisation (relative risk 1·45; 95% CI 1·22-1·73). Hospitalisation significantly increased with combined modality therapy, chemotherapy alone and recent treatment era. TYA HL survivors have excess risk of mortality and secondary malignancy continuing 30 years from diagnosis. Radiotherapy is associated with secondary malignancy and current response-adapted protocols attempt to minimise exposure, but late morbidity causing hospitalisation remains significant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaljit S Bhuller
- Paediatric, Teenage & Young Adult (TYA) Haematology, Leicester Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.,Division of Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplant, British Columbia Children's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Yang Zhang
- Cancer Control Research Program, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Dongdong Li
- Cancer Control Research Program, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Laurie H Sehn
- Division of Medical Oncology and Centre for Lymphoid Cancer, British Columbia Cancer Agency and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Karen Goddard
- Division of Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Mary L McBride
- Cancer Control Research Program, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,School of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Paul C Rogers
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplant, British Columbia Children's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
149
|
Trends in Use of Radiation Therapy for Hodgkin Lymphoma From 2000 to 2012 on the Basis of the National Cancer Data Base. CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA 2016; 16:12-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2015.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2015] [Accepted: 11/12/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
150
|
|