Reduced postoperative blood loss and transfusion requirement after beating-heart coronary operations: a prospective randomized study

Side Effects of Cardiopulmonary Bypass:. What Is the Reality?

Despite many years of clinical and experimental research, the contribution of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cardioplegic arrest to morbidity and mortality following cardiac surgery remains unclear. This is due, in part, to lack of suitable control group against which bypass and cardioplegic arrest can be compared. The recent success of beating heart coronary artery bypass grafting has, however, for the first time, provided an opportunity to compare the same operation, in similar patient groups, with, or without CPB and cardioplegic arrest. CPB is associated with an acute phase reaction of protease cascades, leucocyte, and platelet activation that result in tissue injury. This is largely manifest as subclinical organ dysfunction that produces a clinical effect in those patients that generate an excessive inflammatory response or in those with limited functional reserve. The contribution of myocardial ischemia/reperfusion, secondary to aortic cross-clamping, and cardioplegic arrest, to the systemic inflammatory response and wider organ dysfunction is unknown, and requires further evaluation in clinical trials.

On-Pump Versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Diabetic Patients: A Propensity Score Analysis

BACKGROUND

Diabetic patients are recognized as being at high risk for adverse outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting. We evaluated our outcomes in diabetic patients to compare the effect of off-pump with on-pump coronary revascularization.

METHODS

Between April 1997 and September 2002, 951 consecutive diabetic patients underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. A total of 186 (19.6%) of these patients had off-pump coronary procedures. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the effect of off-pump coronary procedures on adverse in-hospital outcomes, while adjusting for patient and disease characteristics by constructing a propensity score from core patient characteristics. The propensity score was the probability of receiving off-pump coronary operation, with a C-statistic of 0.81, and was included along with the comparison variable in a multivariable analysis of outcome. All analysis was performed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Off-pump patients were more likely to be obese (p = 0.032), have left main stem stenosis (p = 0.034), and have undergone prior cardiac operation (p = 0.027). The off-pump group had fewer patients with three-vessel disease compared with the on-pump group. After risk adjusting with propensity score, off-pump patients had a significantly lower incidence of stroke (adjusted odds ratio 0.15; p = 0.039) and renal failure (adjusted odds ratio 0.38; p = 0.036). Off-pump patients also required less blood transfusion (p < 0.001) and had shorter lengths of stay (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Off-pump coronary operation in diabetic patients significantly reduced postoperative morbidity and length of stay compared with on-pump coronary operation, although no in-hospital survival difference was noted between the two groups.

Total Arterial Revascularization for Multiple Vessel Coronary Artery Disease: With or without Cardiopulmonary Bypass

BACKGROUND

To assess the usefulness of off-pump technique for more technically demanding coronary artery bypass procedures using exclusively arterial conduits.

METHODS

Analysis of perioperative data of 324 consecutive patients in whom total arterial revascularization for multiple- vessel coronary artery disease was performed--181 cases on-pump and 143 cases off-pump.

RESULTS

On average in the on-pump group 2.7 +/- 0.8 (range, 2-5) grafts per patient were constructed versus 2.4 +/- 0.7 (range, 2-4) grafts per patient in the off-pump group (P < .001). Of the total number of 490 anastomoses performed on-pump, 83 (17%) were side-to-side and of 349 anastomoses performed off-pump, 51(15%) were side-to-side, a nonsignificant difference (P = .4). The aorta was used as a site for proximal anastomosis of 1 or more arterial conduits in 105 patients (58%) who underwent on-pump surgery and in 57 patients (40%) who underwent off-pump surgery (P = .002). In the off-pump group, the right internal thoracic artery (RITA) was rarely (12%) routed through the transverse sinus to circumflex branches compared with the on-pump group (34%) (P = .017). RITA in off-pump patients was more often used to revascularize the anterior wall (47% versus 29%; P = .08). We observed no difference in mortality (1.7% versus 0%; P = .3), incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction (8.8% versus 7.7%; P = .8), stroke (1.7% versus 1.4%; P = .8), or atrial fibrillation (24% versus 19%; P = .3). We observed less inotropic support and less blood-product use in off-pump patients.

CONCLUSION

Total arterial revascularization for multiple-vessel coronary artery disease may be safely performed off-pump. We observed tendency to somewhat smoother postoperative course in the off-pump group.

Activation of Hemostasis After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting With or Without Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Activation of coagulation, fibrinolysis, and the vascular endothelium occurs after heart surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), but the effects of eliminating CPB in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are unknown. Therefore, we compared the hemostatic profiles of off-pump and on-pump CABG patients. Two groups of consecutive patients participating in a larger trial (the Octopus Trial) were randomly allocated to undergo CABG with (n = 20) or without (n = 20) CPB. Platelet numbers and plasma concentrations of P-selectin, prothrombin fragment 1.2 (F1.2), soluble fibrin, d-dimers, and von Willebrand factor (as a marker of endothelial cell activation) were measured and corrected for hemodilution. Compared with the on-pump CABG group, F1.2 and d-dimer levels were significantly lower (P = 0.004 and P = 0.03, respectively) in patients having CABG surgery performed off-pump. In the CPB group, F1.2 (median [interquartile range], 450% of baseline [233%-847%]) and d-dimer (538% [318%-1192%]) peaked in the immediate postoperative period and remained increased until Day 4, whereas in the off-pump group, F1.2 and d-dimer levels increased more gradually and peaked on Day 4 (342% [248%-515%] and 555% [387%-882%], respectively). In both groups, von Willebrand factor concentrations were increased until Day 4 (CPB, 308% [228%-405%]; off-pump, 288% [167%-334%]). Despite heparinization, CABG surgery with CPB was associated with excessive thrombin generation and fibrinolytic activity immediately after surgery. The off-pump group demonstrated a delayed postoperative response that became equal in magnitude to the CPB in the later (20-96 h) postoperative period.

Effects of tranexamic acid on postoperative bleeding and related hematochemical variables in coronary surgery: Comparison between on-pump and off-pump techniques

OBJECTIVES

Bleeding and inflammation are major complications of extracorporeal circulation. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting may reduce the rate of complications, but it can only be applied in selected cases. Pilot studies have shown a potential benefit from the use of antifibrinolytic drugs, but efficacy in randomized double-blind studies evaluating off- and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting has not been proved.

METHODS

We enrolled 102 patients scheduled for on-pump (n = 51) or off-pump (n = 51) coronary artery bypass grafting. Patients were separately double-blind randomly assigned to treatment with tranexamic acid (1 g as 20-minute bolus before skin incision, followed by continuous infusion of 400 mg/h, with 500 mg added to priming in patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting) or placebo (saline solution of equivalent volume). Bleeding in the first 24 postoperative hours was the primary outcome. Requirement for allogeneic transfusions, thrombotic complications, outcomes, and monitoring of coagulation, fibrinolysis, and inflammation were also recorded.

RESULTS

Tranexamic acid reduced total postoperative bleeding by 43% in patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and by 27% in those undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (P <.0001), with 80% reduction in bleeding exceeding 600 mL (P <.001), 58% reduction in the requirement for all allogeneic transfusions (P =.07), and no apparent effect on thrombotic complications or outcome. This was associated with a reduction in plasma D-dimer levels (P <.0001), to a greater degree in patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (P <.0001), and interleukin 6 levels (P <.0001), to a greater degree in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (P <.001).

CONCLUSIONS

By affecting fibrinolysis, tranexamic acid significantly reduces bleeding both in off- and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and may modulate inflammation in these surgical settings.

Trainees operating on high-risk patients without cardiopulmonary bypass: a high-risk strategy?

BACKGROUND

The safety of teaching off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting to trainees is best tested in high-risk patients, who are more likely to experience significant morbidity after surgery. This study compared outcomes of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting operations performed by consultants and trainees in high-risk patients.

METHODS

Data for consecutive patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting were collected prospectively. Patients satisfying at least one of the following criteria were classified as high-risk: age older than 75 years, ejection fraction less than 0.30, myocardial infarction in the previous month, current congestive heart failure, previous cerebrovascular accident, creatinine greater than 150 micromol/L, respiratory impairment, peripheral vascular disease, previous cardiac surgery, and left main stem stenosis greater than 50%. Early morbidity, 30-day mortality, and late survival were compared.

RESULTS

From April 1996 to December 2002, 686 high-risk patients underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting revascularization. Operations by five consultants (416; 61%) and four trainees (239; 35%) were the focus of subsequent analyses. Nine visiting or research fellows performed the other 31 operations. Prognostic factors were more favorable in trainee-led operations. On average, consultants and trainees grafted the same number of vessels. There were 18 (4.3%) and 5 (1.9%) deaths within 30 days, and 14 (3.4%) and 5 (1.9%) myocardial infarctions in consultant and trainee groups, respectively. After adjusting for imbalances in prognostic factors, odd ratios for almost all adverse outcomes implied no increased risk with trainee operators, although patients operated on by trainees had longer postoperative stays and were more likely to have a red blood cell transfusion. Kaplan-Meier cumulative mortality estimates at 24-month follow-up were 10.5% (95% confidence interval, 7.7% to 14.2%) and 6.4% (95% confidence interval, 3.8% to 10.9%) in consultant and trainee groups, respectively (hazard ratio = 0.60 [95% confidence interval, 0.37 to 0.99]; p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in high-risk patients can be safely performed by trainees.

Platelet Function Changes as Monitored by Cone and Plate(let) Analyzer during Beating Heart Surgery

BACKGROUND

Off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) is believed to reduce cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)-related complications, including platelet damage. A hypercoagulable state instead of coagulopathy has been reported following OPCAB surgeries due to CPB. Whether platelet function is changed when the injurious effect of CPB is eliminated was investigated.

METHODS

Platelet function was determined with the cone and plate(let) analyzer (CPA) method. The 2 parameters, average size (AS) and surface coverage (SC) of platelet aggregates, were measured with the CPA method to assess platelet aggregation and adhesion. These parameters were evaluated, and their values were compared at several stages of OPCAB surgery. The correlations of postoperative bleeding with platelet function at different stages of the surgery and with other factors, such as platelet count, hematocrit, and transfusions, were studied.

RESULTS

Both AS and SC increased during several stages of the operation, and postoperative values (mean +/- SD) were significantly higher than preoperative values (30.4 +/- 8.1 microm 2 versus 23.3 +/- 6.9 microm 2 for AS [ P =.02] and 7.6% +/- 3.6% versus 5.2% +/- 1.8% for SC [ P =.04]). The mean total bleeding volume was 875 micro 415 mL. Preoperative AS and SC were the only parameters significantly ( P =.01) and linearly ( r = 0.7) related to postoperative bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

An increased platelet function, as determined by the CPA method, is found following OPCAB surgery. This phenomenon is probably at least partially responsible for the thrombogenic state after OPCAB surgery. Lack of platelet injury attributed to CPB may divert the system toward a more thrombogenic state. Preoperative platelet function, as evaluated by the CPA method, is an independent risk factor determining postoperative bleeding.

Off-Pump coronary artery bypass operation does not increase procoagulant and fibrinolytic activity: preliminary results

BACKGROUND

This study analyzes the effects on coagulation and fibrinolysis comparing off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) and on-pump CABG operations.

METHODS

In a prospective, nonrandomized, comparative evaluation, patients scheduled for elective myocardial revascularization were studied. Due to possible confounding factors patients with postoperative retransfusion of mediastinal shed blood were excluded. Nine patients underwent OPCAB operation and 16 underwent on-pump CABG. Activated clotting time (ACT) was adjusted to 250 seconds in OPCAB (81 +/- 18 [mean +/- SD] IU/kg heparin) and to more than 480 seconds in on-pump CABG (400 IU/kg heparin, additional 10,000 IU in pump prime). Perioperatively blood samples were collected and hematologic and hemostatic variables including fibrinopeptide A (FPA), fibrin monomer (FM), thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), and D-dimer were analyzed.

RESULTS

Both groups showed comparable demographic variables. Number of grafts per patient was slightly higher in the on-pump group (3.6 +/- 0.6 versus 3.0 +/- 1.1, p = 0.23). The FPA levels did not differ significantly between the groups. The FM, TAT, and D-dimer values were significantly higher in on-pump CABG (p < 0.0001, p < 0.01, and p < 0.0001, respectively), reflecting increased coagulant and fibrinolytic activity. This was also the case when values were corrected for hemodilution.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite lower systemic anticoagulation activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis is reduced in OPCAB compared with on-pump CABG. Reduced thrombin generation and reduced fibrinolytic activity in OPCAB indicates better preservation of hemostasis. We suggest the term "preserved hemostasis" instead of "hypercoagulant activity" with respect to OPCAB.

Intraoperative Moderate Acute Normovolemic Hemodilution Associated with a Comprehensive Blood-Sparing Protocol in Off-Pump Coronary Surgery

We evaluated the blood-sparing effects of intraoperative moderate acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH) combined with intraoperative tranexamic acid treatment and shed blood reinfusion in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB). One-hundred consecutive OPCAB patients (baseline hematocrit >34%) were prospectively randomized to tranexamic acid treatment (control group; 50 patients) or to tranexamic acid treatment plus normovolemic (1:1 replacement with colloids) withdrawal of 17% +/- 2% of the circulating blood volume (ANH group; 50 patients). All patients had shed blood reinfused with intraoperative bleeding in excess of 250 mL. The requirement for allogeneic transfusions, based on strict a priori defined criteria, was the primary end point of the study. Hematochemical evaluations, bleeding, major complications, and other outcomes were also recorded. Demographics, baseline hematochemical data, and operative characteristics were similar in the two groups. Patients in the ANH group had a median of 850 mL of blood withdrawn and showed a lower intraoperative minimum hematocrit (31% vs 37%; P < 0.0001). Two patients in the ANH group versus 10 patients in the control group (odds ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.89; P = 0.028) required transfusion of a significantly smaller number of packed red blood cell units (5 vs 24; P < 0.001). Postoperative hematochemical variables, bleeding, and outcomes were similar in the two groups of patients. Moderate ANH, combined with tranexamic acid administration and on-demand shed blood reinfusion, may reduce allogeneic transfusion requirements in OPCAB patients.

IMPLICATIONS

We studied the blood-sparing effects of moderate acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH) in 100 patients undergoing off-pump coronary surgery (OPCAB). Combined with tranexamic acid administration and shed blood reinfusion when the intraoperative bleeding exceeded 250 mL, ANH was effective in reducing the number of OPCAB patients who required allogeneic transfusions and the number of packed red blood cell units transfused.

Coronary artery bypass grafting in an immune thrombocytopenic purpura patient using off-pump techniques

We performed an off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) procedure on a 60-year-old woman with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) whose platelet count was 42 x 10(3) per microliter on admission. She was treated with immunoglobulin G (IgG) (0.5 g.kg(-1).d(-1)) for 4 days, resulting in a platelet count rise to 187 x 10(3) per microliter. She subsequently underwent an uneventful OPCABG procedure without requiring any blood transfusions. The combination of OPCABG and preoperative IgG therapy appears to be an ideal strategy for ITP patients requiring coronary revascularization.

Off-pump myocardial revascularization is associated with less incidence of stroke in elderly patients

Several recent studies have highlighted the potential benefits of using off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery, particularly in high-risk patients. The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the effect of OPCAB on the incidence of stroke compared with coronary artery bypass grafting using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in elderly patients. We performed a meta-analysis of all observational studies, published in MEDLINE between 1999 and 2002 and a comparison between the OPCAB and CPB techniques in elderly patients was performed with the outcome of interest being the incidence of stroke. Elderly patients were defined as those aged 70 years or older. Nine studies are included in the meta-analysis. The total number of subjects included was 4,475 patients, of which, 1,253 underwent OPCAB (28%) and 3,222 (72%) underwent CPB. The meta-analysis showed that the OPCAB technique was associated with significantly lower incidence of stroke in elderly patients compared with the CPB technique (1% vs 3%), with an odds ratio of 0.38% to 95% (CI, 0.22 to 0.65). We did not identify any significant heterogeneity and funnel plot asymmetry between the studies included in the meta-analysis. Meta-regression analysis including variables predicting stroke, mortality, and study characteristics did not show any associations affecting the calculated odds ratio of stroke. Despite the fact that this is a meta-analysis of observational studies and adjustment for differences in baseline risk factors between OPCAB and CPB patients was not possible, we believe that this study suggests that the OPCAB technique might be associated with reduced incidence of stroke in the elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: physiology and anaesthetic management †

Increasing interest is being shown in beating heart (off-pump) coronary artery surgery (OPCAB) because, compared with operations performed with cardiopulmonary bypass, OPCAB surgery may be associated with decreased postoperative morbidity and reduced total costs. Its appears to produce better results than conventional surgery in high-risk patient populations, elderly patients, and those with compromised cardiac function or coagulation disorders. Recent improvements in the technique have resulted in the possibility of multiple-vessel grafting in all coronary territories, with a graft patency comparable with conventional surgery. During beating-heart surgery, anaesthetists face two problems: first, the maintenance of haemodynamic stability during heart enucleation necessary for accessing each coronary artery; and second, the management of intraoperative myocardial ischaemia when coronary flow must be interrupted during grafting. The anaesthetic technique is less important than adequate management of these two major constraints. However, experimental and recent clinical data suggest that volatile anaesthetics have a marked cardioprotective effect against ischaemia, and might be specifically indicated. OPCAB surgery requires team work between anaesthetists and surgeons, who must be aware of each other's constraints. Some surgical aspects of the operation are reviewed along with physiological and anaesthetic data.

Coronary Bypass Surgery Performed off Pump Does Not Result in Lower In-Hospital Morbidity Than Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Performed on Pump

BACKGROUND

There is increasing evidence that cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) may be responsible for the morbidity associated with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. Recent developments in cardiac stabilization devices have made CABG without CPB feasible. However, there is conflicting evidence to date from published trials comparing outcomes between CABG performed with and without CPB, with some trials indicating an advantage to the avoidance of CPB and others showing little benefit.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a single-center randomized trial, 300 patients requiring CABG surgery at a single institution were prospectively randomized to have the procedure performed with CPB (n=150) or on the beating heart (n=150). Exclusion criteria for the trial included emergency procedure, concomitant major cardiac procedures, ejection fraction <30%, and reoperation. In-hospital outcomes were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. A mean of 3.0+/-0.9 grafts were performed in the CPB group compared with 2.8+/-0.9 grafts in the beating-heart group (P=0.06). There were no significant differences between the CPB group and the beating-heart group in mortality (0.7% versus 1.3%; P=1.0), transfusion (8.7% versus 9.3%), perioperative myocardial infarction (0.7% versus 2.7%; P=0.37), permanent stroke (0% versus 1.3%; P=0.50), new atrial fibrillation (32% versus 25%; P=0.20), and deep sternal wound infection (0.7% versus 0%; P=1.0). The mean time to extubation was 4 hours, the mean stay in the intensive care unit was 22 hours, and the median length of hospitalization was 5 days in both groups (P=NS).

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to published trials, we were unable to demonstrate any advantage with CABG performed without CPB in terms of patient morbidity. Excellent results can be obtained with either surgical approach.

High risk coronary artery bypass patient: incidence, surgical strategies, and results

BACKGROUND

To describe our experience in the treatment of high risk coronary artery bypass patients and compare patients assigned to on-pump or off-pump surgery.

METHODS

During a 42-month period 306 high risk (Euroscore > 5) coronary artery bypass patients were consecutively treated at our institution. On the basis of the coronary anatomy and possibility of achieving a complete revascularization, 197 patients were assigned to off-pump and 109 to on-pump operation. Overall mortality was 6.2% (19 of 306 patients).

RESULTS

Although patients treated off-pump had a better cardiac status, no clinical advantages related to the avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass were found in the overall population. Off-pump patients had more early and late cardiac complications, whereas patients operated on-pump exhibited an higher incidence of postoperative systemic organ dysfunction. Off-pump surgery improved in-hospital outcome only in the subset of patients at highest risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass does not confer significant clinical advantages in all high risk coronary patients; instead, there are particular subsets of patients in whom beating heart surgery can be particularly indicated and others for whom on-pump revascularization appears a better solution. Adaptation of the operation to the single patient is probably the way to improve outcome.

A comparison of short- and long-term outcomes after off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery with sternotomy

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to compare in-hospital mortality and complications and three-year mortality and revascularization for off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery after adjusting for patient risk.

BACKGROUND

The use of off-pump CABG surgery has increased tremendously in recent years, but little is known about its long-term outcomes relative to on-pump CABG surgery, and most studies have been very small.

METHODS

Short- and long-term outcomes (inpatient mortality and complications, three-year risk-adjusted mortality, and mortality/revascularization) were explored for patients who underwent off-pump CABG surgery (9135 patients) and on-pump CABG surgery (59044 patients) with median sternotomy from 1997 to 2000 in the state of New York.

RESULTS

Risk-adjusted inpatient mortality was 2.02% for off-pump versus 2.16% for on-pump (p = 0.390). Off-pump patients had lower rates of perioperative stroke (1.6% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.003) and bleeding requiring reoperation (1.6% vs. 2.2%, p < 0.001) and higher rates of gastrointestinal bleeding, perforation, or infarction (1.2% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.003). Off-pump patients had lower postoperative lengths of stay (median 5 days vs. 6 days, p < 0.001). On-pump patients had higher three-year survival (adjusted risk ratio [RR] =1.086, p = 0.045) and higher freedom from death or revascularization (adjusted RR = 1.232, p < 0.001). When analyses were limited to 1999 to 2000, the two-year adjusted hazard ratio for survival was not significant (adjusted RR = 0.99, p = 0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

On-pump patients experience better long-term survival and freedom from revascularization than off-pump patients. However, the survival benefit from on-pump procedures was no longer present in the last two years of the study.

Innovative surgical strategies: Minimally invasive CABG and off-pump CABG

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) have made up a significant facet of the recent attempts of surgical myocardial revascularization to evolve. Driven by an effort to limit the deleterious effects of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), along with a response to both the growing interests in performing procedures through smaller incisions and the successes of catheter-based therapies, these therapeutic options have found themselves moving into the future by resurrecting their past. Minimally invasive CABG is the procedure by which coronary grafting is performed through a small anterior thoracotomy, without the use of CPB. Although feasible, the inability to offer a more thorough degree of revascularization has limited the applicability of this procedure and, therefore, accounts for its overall minor contribution to the number of coronary revascularizations performed annually. Conversely, as the technical feasibility of performing complete revascularization without CPB has been achieved with OPCAB, its place as a mode of therapy remains uncertain. Several clinical trials have been performed to date with only a few being done in a prospective, randomized fashion. From this data has come a mix of information regarding either improvements or, at a minimum, no change in the rate of complications between CABG with, and without, CPB, while at the same time maintaining equivalent short-term graft patencies. The question remains, however, to which patient population is this approach to CABG optimal? Our practice has largely reserved OPCAB for those patients in whom manipulation of the aorta is considered not feasible due to severe calcification or in "high-risk" patients who are felt to be unable to tolerate the adverse physiologic effects of CPB. This makes up approximately 15% of our CABG population, roughly equal to the national average, with the remaining patients being revascularized with the assistance of CPB.

Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass (OPCAB) surgery reduces risk-stratified morbidity and mortality: a United Kingdom Multi-Center Comparative Analysis of Early Clinical Outcome

OBJECTIVE

Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass (OPCAB) surgery is gaining more popularity worldwide. The aim of this United Kingdom (UK) multi-center study was to assess the early clinical outcome of the OPCAB technique and perform a risk-stratified comparison with the conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) using the Cardio-Pulmonary Bypass (CPB) technique.

METHODS

Data were collected on 5,163 CPB patients from the database of the National Heart and Lung institute, Imperial College, University of London, and on 2,223 OPCAB patients from eight UK cardiac surgical centers, which run established OPCAB surgery programs. All patients had undergone primary isolated CABG for multi-vessel disease through a midline sternotomy approach, between January 1997 and April 2001. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were compared between the CPB and OPCAB patients after adjusting for case-mix. The mortality of the OPCAB patients was also compared, using risk stratification, to the mortality figures reported by the Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (SCTS) based on 28,018 patients in the national database who were operated on between January 1996 and December 1999.

RESULTS

Morbidity and mortality were significantly lower in the OPCAB patients compared with the CPB patients and the UK national database of CABG patients, over the same period of time, after adjusting for case-mix.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that risk stratified morbidity and mortality are significantly lower in OPCAB patients than CPB patients and patients in the UK national database.

Early and midterm clinical outcome in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction undergoing coronary artery surgery

BACKGROUND

Patients presenting with severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction undergoing coronary artery surgery are at increased risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality. The present study investigated early and midterm outcomes in a consecutive series of patients with severe LV dysfunction undergoing coronary surgery at our institution.

METHODS

Data on 5,195 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) alone (in-hospital mortality 1.35%) from April 1996 to August 2002 were prospectively recorded in the Patient Analysis and Tracking System. Two hundred and fifty patients (median age 65 years [interquartile range, 57 to 70]) with preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction less than 30% (74 off pump; 29.6%) were identified and early and midterm clinical outcomes analyzed. Propensity scores were used to take account of the imbalance in the distribution of prognostic factors between the on-pump and off-pump groups.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing on-pump surgery were less likely to have current congestive heart failure, insulin-dependent diabetes, a history of hypertension, have had gastrointestinal tract surgery or an ulcer, or unstable angina. They had on average lower Parsonnet scores and New York Heart Association and Canadian Cardiovascular Score ratings. However they were more likely to have more extensive coronary artery heart disease and to require more grafts than those undergoing off-pump surgery. After adjustment for consultant team and propensity scores no differences between groups with regard to in-hospital mortality and morbidity were found. The only in-hospital outcome to show a significant difference after adjustment was the need for intraoperative inotropic support, which was higher in the on-pump group (odds ratio 5.1; 95% confidence interval 2.55 to 10.2; p < 0.001)). The median follow-up times for the on- and off-pump groups were 3.4 years and 1.4 years respectively. Three-year survival was higher with on-pump surgery (87% on-pump versus 73% off-pump) but this difference did not reach statistical significance after adjustment for prognostic variables (hazard ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.22 to 1.26, p = 0.16).

CONCLUSIONS

In-hospital mortality and morbidity in patients presenting with severe LV dysfunction is low with comparable results with both on- and off-pump coronary artery surgery. Midterm clinical outcome is encouraging and seems to justify surgical revascularization for this high-risk group of patients.

Effect of body mass index on early outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to quantify the effect of body mass index (BMI) on early clinical outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

BACKGROUND

Obesity is considered a risk factor for postoperative morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery, although existing evidence is contradictory.

METHODS

A concurrent cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing CABG from April 1996 to September 2001 was carried out. Main outcomes were early death; perioperative myocardial infarction; infective, respiratory, renal, and neurological complications; transfusion; duration of ventilation, intensive care unit, and hospital stay. Multivariable analyses compared the risk of outcomes between five different BMI groups after adjusting for case-mix.

RESULTS

Out of 4,372 patients, 3.0% were underweight (BMI <20 kg/m(2)), 26.7% had a normal weight (BMI >or=20 and <25 kg/m(2)), 49.7% were overweight (BMI >or=25 and <30 kg/m(2)), 17.1% obese (BMI >or=30 and <35 kg/m(2)) and 3.6% severely obese (BMI >or=35 kg/m(2)). Compared with the normal weight group, the overweight and obese groups included more women, diabetics, and hypertensives, but fewer patients with severe ischemic heart disease and poor ventricular function. Underweight patients were more likely than normal weight patients to die in hospital (odds ratio [OR] = 4.0, 95% CI 1.4 to 11.1), have a renal complication (OR = 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0 to 3.7), or stay in hospital longer (>7 days) (OR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.5). Overweight, obese, and severely obese patients were not at higher risk of adverse outcomes than normal weight patients, and were less likely than normal weight patients to require transfusion (ORs from 0.42 to 0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

Underweight patients undergoing CABG have a higher risk of death or complications than normal weight patients. Obesity does not affect the risk of perioperative death and other adverse outcomes compared to normal weight, yet obese patients appear less likely to be selected for surgery than normal weight patients.

A comparison of bleeding and transfusion in patients who undergo coronary artery bypass grafting via sternotomy with and without cardiopulmonary bypass

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether there is a difference between on-pump cardiopulmonary bypass (CABG) and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) without heparin reversal with regard to bleeding, transfusion requirements, and incidence of surgical re-exploration of the mediastinum.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

A large academic medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

One hundred CABG patients were compared with 100 OPCAB patients. Statistical significance was measured with P values of <or=0.05. The heparin was not reversed in the OPCAB patients. CABG patients received more intraoperative allogeneic red blood cells (median 250 mL v 0 mL, p = 0.002), intraoperative autotransfusion (IAT) (550 mL v 425 mL, p = 0.001), platelets (9% v 1%, p = 0.009), and less albumin (0 mL v 250 mL, p = 0.001) than OPCAB patients. Postoperatively, CABG patients were more likely to receive fresh-frozen plasma (19% v 8%, p = 0.03) and less likely to receive IAT than the OPCAB group. During the initial 4-hour postoperative period, OPCAB patients exhibited greater blood loss via chest tube (290 mL v 385 mL, p = 0.003); however, at 12 hours and 24 hours postoperatively, there was no statistical difference in blood loss between the 2 groups. There were no statistically significant differences in surgical re-exploration of the mediastinum between the CABG and OPCAB groups.

CONCLUSION

Despite not reversing the heparin at the end of the OPCAB surgery, OPCAB surgery was associated with an overall reduction in allogeneic transfusion requirements.

Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass: meta-analysis of currently available randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) challenges the conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) as the standard of surgical therapy for coronary disease. The aim of this study is to assess the differences in clinical outcomes between CABG and OPCAB by meta-analysis of data published in randomized trials.

METHODS

A literature search (Medline, Pubmed, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and the Cochrane Medical Editors Trial Amnesty of unpublished clinical trials) was done for the period starting from January 1990 until May 2002 and was supplemented with a manual bibliographic review for all peer-reviewed English language publications. A systematic overview (meta-analysis) of the randomized trials was done to define the risk of the composite end point (death, stroke, or myocardial infarction) in CABG versus OPCAB.

RESULTS

A literature search yielded nine comparable randomized studies, for a total of 1090 patients, of whom 558 and 532 were randomly assigned to CABG and OPCAB, respectively. Meta-analysis of these studies showed a trend, albeit not statistically significant, toward reduction in the risk of the composite end point for patients who had OPCAB (odds ratio 0.48; 95% confidence interval 0.21 to 1.09; p = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Cumulative analysis of the few prospective randomized studies currently available found a potential clinical benefit of OPCAB, indicating that the avoidance of extracorporeal circulation might result in improved clinical outcomes. Further evidence, however, from large randomized trials is needed to assess potential advantages of OPCAB in terms of early outcomes.

Is the female gender an independent predictor of adverse outcome after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting?

BACKGROUND

The female gender is an independent predictor of adverse outcome after conventional coronary artery bypass grafting using cardiopulmonary bypass. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of the female gender on the outcome after off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective review of 413 consecutive patients (181 women and 232 men) who underwent OPCAB between January 1999 and May 2001. Adverse outcomes were divided into minor adverse outcomes (MINAO), major adverse outcomes (MAJAO), and prolonged length of stay (PLOS) more than 7 days. MINAO included atrial fibrillation, respiratory complications except adult respiratory distress syndrome, and any wound infection except mediastinitis. MAJAO included stroke, myocardial infarction, renal failure, adult respiratory distress syndrome, mediastinitis, low cardiac output, mechanical ventilation more than 24 hours, intensive therapy unit stay more than 24 hours, gastrointestinal complications, cardiorespiratory arrest, and mortality within 30 days. Preoperative and intraoperative variables were evaluated as predictors of MINAO, MAJAO, and PLOS by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The groups were matched for age and Parsonnet score-predicted mortality. However, the women had a higher incidence of chronic obstructive airway disease (p = 0.04), diabetes (p = 0.01), obesity (p = 0.000), peripheral vascular disease (p = 0.000), hypertension (p = 0.000), unstable angina (p = 0.005), history of previous failed nonsurgical intervention (p = 0.02), and nonelective operation (p = 0.000). There were a fewer number of grafts performed in the female group (2.8 vs 3.4, p = 0.000), with the circumflex territory being revascularised less frequently (p = 0.001). Univariate analysis identified the female gender to be a predictor of only MINAO (p = 0.001) and PLOS (p = 0.000). However, with multivariate analysis, female gender was not found to be an independent predictor of MINAO, MAJAO, or PLOS.

CONCLUSIONS

In OPCAB, the female gender is not an independent predictor of MINAO, MAJAO, or PLOS.

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides complete revascularization with reduced myocardial injury, transfusion requirements, and length of stay: a prospective randomized comparison of two hundred unselected patients undergoing off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting

OBJECTIVE

Retrospective comparisons of selected patients undergoing off-pump versus conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting have yielded inconsistent results and raised concerns about completeness of revascularization in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

METHODS

Two hundred unselected patients referred for elective primary coronary artery bypass grafting were randomly assigned to undergo off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with an Octopus tissue stabilizer (Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) or conventional coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass by a single surgeon. Revascularization intent determined before random assignment was compared with the revascularization performed. All management followed strict, unbiased, criteria-driven protocols. Patients and nonoperative care providers were blinded to surgical group.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar. The number of grafts performed per patient (mean +/- SD 3.39 +/- 1.04 for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, 3.40 +/- 1.08 for conventional coronary artery bypass grafting) and the index of completeness of revascularization (number of grafts performed/number of grafts intended, 1.00 +/- 0.18 for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, 1.01 +/- 0.09 for conventional coronary artery bypass grafting) were similar. Likewise, the index of completeness of revascularization was similar between groups for the lateral wall. Combined hospital and 30-day mortalities and stroke rates were similar. Postoperative myocardial serum enzyme measures were significantly lower after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, suggesting less myocardial injury. Adjusted postoperative thromboelastogram indices, fibrinogen, international normalized ratio, and platelet levels all showed significantly less coagulopathy after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting received fewer units of blood, were more likely to avoid transfusion altogether, and had a higher hematocrit at discharge. Cardiopulmonary bypass was an independent predictor of transfusion (odds ratio 2.42, P =.0073) by multivariate analysis. More patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting were extubated in the operating room and within 4 hours. Postoperative length of stay (in days) was shorter for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (5.1 +/- 6.5 for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, 6.1 +/- 8.2 for conventional coronary artery bypass grafting, P =.005 by Wilcoxon test). One patient (in the conventional coronary artery bypass grafting group) required angioplasty for graft closure within 30 days.

CONCLUSIONS

When compared with conventional coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass, off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting achieved similar completeness of revascularization, similar in-hospital and 30-day outcomes, shorter length of stay, reduced transfusion requirement, and less myocardial injury.

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: not a flash in the pan

During the past decade, technical improvements have made off-pump coronary artery bypass operations a routine procedure. During this time, off-pump coronary artery bypass has been audited against conventional techniques by many observational, case-matched, and prospective randomized studies. There is evidence in the literature suggesting that off-pump coronary artery bypass operations reduce postoperative morbidity, organ dysfunction, and costs, without compromising midterm outcome compared with conventional coronary operations. The available evidence also supports the view that high-risk patients might benefit the most from revascularization on the beating heart. High quality follow-up data are still needed to assess the impact of off-pump coronary artery bypass operations on long-term clinical outcome.

Complications related to off-pump bypass grafting

Surgical myocardial revascularization is a technique undergoing critical reevaluation in an attempt to reduce operative morbidity and mortality. As the age and number of comorbidities in the surgical population presenting for bypass increases, improved strategies to lessen operative risk have evolved. The use of off-pump bypass grafting to avoid the detrimental effects of extracorporeal circulation demonstrates great promise in reducing operative complications. However, with new techniques come new challenges. Avoidance of the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit has been linked to the development of a hypercoagulable state postoperatively. Complications related to the unique management of the ascending aorta and target vessels during the performance of beating heart surgery are also being reported. Moreover, despite increasing experience in a number of centers, hemodynamic collapse does occur during off-pump bypass, thereby requiring rapid institution of cardiopulmonary bypass. Continued scientific investigation and research should provide the tools to manage the unique obstacles encountered with off-pump coronary artery bypass.

Effect of off-pump coronary surgery with right ventricular assist device on organ function and inflammatory response: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Right ventricular assist devices (RVADs) have been proposed to improve exposure of the coronary arteries in off-pump surgery. In this study we investigated the impact of the A-Med RVAD on inflammatory response and organ function in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

METHODS

Sixty patients were prospectively randomized to conventional surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cardioplegic arrest, beating heart surgery (off-pump), or beating heart surgery with the RVAD. Serial blood samples were collected postoperatively, for analysis of inflammatory markers, troponin I, protein S100, and free hemoglobin. Renal tubular function was assessed by measuring urine N-acetyl-glucosaminidase activity.

RESULTS

No hospital deaths or major postoperative complications occurred in the study population. Interleukin-6, interleukin-8, C3a, and troponin I levels after surgery were significantly higher in the CPB group compared with the off-pump and RVAD groups. Free hemoglobin levels immediately after the operation, peak and total S100 levels, and N-acetyl-glucosaminidase activity were also significantly higher in the CPB group.

CONCLUSIONS

Off-pump coronary revascularization, with or without RVAD, reduces inflammatory response, myocardial, neurologic, and renal injury, and decreases hemolysis when compared with conventional surgery with CPB and cardioplegic arrest.

Does off-pump coronary surgery reduce morbidity and mortality?

OBJECTIVE

To compare hospital outcomes of on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.

METHODS

From 1997 to 2000, primary coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 481 patients off pump and in 3231 patients on pump. Hospital outcomes were compared between propensity-matched pairs of 406 on-pump and 406 off-pump patients. The 2 groups were similar in age (P =.9), left ventricular function (P =.7), extent of coronary artery disease (P =.5), carotid artery disease (P =.4), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P =.5). However, off-pump patients had more previous strokes (P =.05) and peripheral vascular disease (P =.02); on-pump patients had a higher preoperative New York Heart Association class (P =.01).

RESULTS

In the matched pairs the mean number of bypass grafts was 2.8 +/- 1.0 in off-pump patients and 3.5 +/- 1.1 in on-pump patients (P <.001). Fewer grafts were performed to the circumflex (P <.001) and right coronary (P =.006) artery systems in the off-pump patients. Postoperative mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, and reoperation for bleeding were similar in the 2 groups. There was more encephalopathy (P =.02), sternal wound infection (P =.04), red blood cell use (P =.002), and renal failure requiring dialysis (P =.03) in the on-pump patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Both off- and on-pump procedures produced excellent early clinical results with low mortality. An advantage of an off-pump operation was less postoperative morbidity; however, less complete revascularization introduced uncertainty about late results. A disadvantage of on-pump bypass was higher morbidity that seemed attributable to cardiopulmonary bypass.

The evolution of training in off-pump coronary surgery in a single institution

BACKGROUND

This study analyses the development of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery training at a single institution, and compares the early and midterm clinical outcomes of OPCAB and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedures performed by trainees with or without direct consultant cardiothoracic surgeon supervision.

METHODS

Analysis was undertaken on data prospectively recorded on a computer database (Patient Analysis and Tracking System). Of the 2,422 CABG operations performed between January 1999 and December 2001, 969 (40%) were carried out by trainees either off pump (422) or on pump (547).

RESULTS

Although the total number of CABG operations performed by trainees remained constant, there was a significant increase in the number of OPCAB operations during the study period compared with conventional CABG, as well as an increase in the average number of grafts per patient in the OPCAB group (both p < 0.05). Furthermore, a significant trend towards using two or more arterial conduits in the OPCAB group was observed in the study period. The number of OPCAB operations performed by trainees as independent operators without direct consultant supervision also increased significantly (p < 0.05). Early and midterm clinical outcomes were similar between patients operated by trainees on pump or off pump as independent operators versus under direct consultant supervision.

CONCLUSIONS

The significant increase in OPCAB operations performed by trainees as independent operators or under direct consultant supervision, as well as the increase in the number of grafts per patient and arterial conduits used for myocardial revascularization, demonstrate a progression of training in beating heart surgery for cardiothoracic trainees. Improvements in the techniques have made it safe to teach trainees off-pump multivessel coronary artery revascularization.

Effectiveness of coronary artery bypass grafting with or without cardiopulmonary bypass in overweight patients

BACKGROUND

Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery has been demonstrated to reduce morbidity in elective patients. However, high-risk patients might benefit the most from this surgical procedure. Our goal was to investigate the effectiveness of on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery on early clinical outcome in a consecutive series of overweight patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From April 1996 to April 2001, data on 4321 patients undergoing coronary surgery (mortality 1.4%) were prospectively entered into the Patient Analysis and Tracking System. Data were extracted for all patients with a body mass index > or =25 kg/m(2). A risk-adjusted analysis was performed to assess the effect of surgical technique in the whole overweight cohort. 2844 patients were identified (2261 male, median age 63, interquartile range 56 to 68). Patients undergoing on-pump surgery (2170, 76.3%) were less likely than those undergoing off-pump surgery to have hypercholesterolemia or left main stem disease and were, on average, less obese. However, they were more likely to have unstable angina and to have had a previous myocardial infarction, and they had more extensive coronary disease and received more grafts (all P<0.05). Unadjusted analyses, taking account only of consultant team, showed significant benefits of off-pump surgery in terms of hospital deaths, arrhythmias, inotropic use, use of intra-aortic balloon pump, blood loss, transfusion requirement, postoperative hemoglobin, chest infections, neurological complications, intensive care unit and hospital stay (all P<0.05). After adjustment for confounding prognostic factors, the benefits of off-pump surgery were still significant for death in hospital, transfusion requirement, postoperative hemoglobin, neurological complications, intensive care unit and hospital stay (ORs 0.35 to 0.79, P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that off-pump surgery is safe and effective and is associated with a reduced in-hospital mortality and morbidity in overweight patients when compared with conventional coronary surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest.

Impact of cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass on course of chronic lymphatic leukemia: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

Chronic lymphatic leukemia (CLL) is a common disease among elderly individuals. The number of older patients undergoing operations with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is increasing. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of cardiac surgery using CPB on the long-term course of CLL.

METHODS

From 1992 to 2000, a total of 28 patients with CLL underwent heart surgery using CPB at our institution (group I). These patients were compared with 25 patients from the CLL register who were retrospectively matched with regard to preoperative administration of chemotherapy, Binet classification, age, and sex (group II). A time-point was selected for each patient in group II so that the variables for the two groups corresponded in relation to the time of operation of the patients in group I. Midterm follow-up data in both groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were no differences between groups regarding matched variables. The mean follow-up time was similar in both groups (2.6 +/- 2.2 vs 2.3 +/- 1.3 years, p > 0.5). The 30-day mortality in group I was 14.3%. The mean stay in the intensive care unit was 4.2 +/- 7.5 days; the median number of units of packed red blood cells transfused was three (range 0 to 17). Compared with group II, in group I significantly fewer patients (11 vs 17, p = 0.049) required chemotherapy significantly later (1.98 +/- 2.06 vs 0.84 +/- 1.18 years, p = 0.018). During follow-up, no difference was found between groups regarding severe infections (10 vs 14, p = 0.14). Despite postoperative mortality in group I, the long-term mortality was similar in both groups (p = 0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac surgery using CPB did not have a negative impact on the natural course of CLL. Moreover, this procedure seems to be associated with a decrease in the number of postoperative chemotherapy administrations and with an increase of chemotherapy-free survival time. Although CLL may be a risk factor in the early postoperative period, it is not a contraindication for cardiac surgery using CPB.

Subsystem organ function during coronary surgery

Conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) carries a mortality rate of 1% to 2% in elective patients. However, despite advances in perfusion, anaesthetic, and surgical techniques cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is still associated with subsystem dysfunction. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) has recently gained popularity as a potentially more physiological method to maintain the functional integrity of major organ systems. The review of observational reports, case-matched studies and prospective randomized trials seems to suggest that OPCAB surgery reduces postoperative subsystem organ dysfunction when compared with conventional coronary revascularisation.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in high-risk patients: an observational study

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery bypass grafting in high-risk patients carries substantial morbidity. We compared the effectiveness of off-pump revascularization with that of conventional coronary artery bypass grafting using cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest in consecutive high-risk patients.

METHODS

From April 1996 to December 2000, clinical data for consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery revascularization were prospectively entered into a database. Data were extracted for all patients considered to be high risk, defined as the presence of one or more of ten adverse prognostic factors. Hospital mortality and early morbidity were compared between two groups of patients, the on-pump and off-pump groups.

RESULTS

The study group comprised 1,570 consecutive high-risk patients, 332 (21.1%) of whom underwent an off-pump operation. Patients in the on-pump group had fewer high-risk factors and lower Parsonnet scores and were less likely to be 75 years of age or older, to have peripheral vascular disease or hypercholesterolemia, or to have sustained a previous transient ischemic attack. However, they were more likely to be assigned to a higher Canadian Cardiovascular Society class and had more extensive coronary artery disease and were more likely to have unstable angina, to require urgent or emergency operations, and to receive more grafts than those undergoing off-pump procedures. Unadjusted odds ratios for intensive care unit or high-dependency unit stay, total length of stay, blood loss of more than 1,000 mL, postoperative hemoglobin and transfusion requirement all showed a highly significant benefit for the off-pump group (p < or = 0.005; odds ratios, 0.33 to 0.65). After adjustment for prognostic variables, odds ratios remained essentially unaltered (adjusted odds ratio estimates 0.36 to p < 0.05) except for blood loss of more than 1,000 mL (adjusted odds ratio estimate, 0.82; p = 0.22). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting is safe, effective, and associated with reduced morbidity in high-risk patients compared with conventional coronary artery revascularization.

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: new developments but a better outcome?

Off-pump coronary artery surgery is now performed safely and effectively without cardiopulmonary bypass. This review includes indications, approaches, anaesthetic and haemodynamic management, and compares the occurrence of postoperative complications and multiorgan dysfunction with conventional cardiac surgery.

Coronary revascularization with or without cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with preoperative nondialysis-dependent renal insufficiency

BACKGROUND

Preoperative renal insufficiency is a predictor of acute renal failure in patients undergoing conventional coronary artery bypass grafting. Off-pump coronary artery bypass operations have been shown to reduce renal dysfunction in patients with normal renal function, but the effect of this technique in patients with preoperative nondialysis-dependent renal insufficiency is unknown.

METHODS

From June 1996 to December 1999, data of 3,250 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were prospectively entered into the Patient Analysis & Tracking Systems (PATS, Dendrite Clinical Systems, London, UK). Two hundred and fifty-three patients with preoperative serum creatinine more than 150 micromol/L were identified (202 patients on-pump, 51 patients off-pump), and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Serum creatinine and urea, in-hospital mortality, and morbidity were compared between groups. The association of perioperative factors with acute renal failure was investigated by multiple logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Preoperative characteristics were similar between the groups. Mean number of grafts was 2.9 +/- 0.8 and 2.3 +/- 0.8 in the on-pump and off-pump groups, respectively (p < 0.0001). Comparison between groups showed a significantly higher incidence of stroke, inotropic requirement, blood loss, and transfusion of red packed cell and platelets in the on-pump group (all p < 0.05). Postoperative serum creatinine and urea were higher in the on-pump group with a significant difference at 12 hours postoperatively (p < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis identified cardiopulmonary bypass, serum creatinine level 60 hours postoperatively, inotropic requirement, need for intraaortic balloon pump, transfusion of red packed cell, and hours of ventilation as predictors of postoperative acute renal failure.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that off-pump coronary artery bypass operations reduce in-hospital morbidity and the likelihood of acute renal failure in patients with preoperative nondialysis-dependent renal insufficiency undergoing myocardial revascularization.