Pneumococcal macrolide resistance--myth or reality?

Ribosomal Resistance: Emerging Problems and Potential Solutions

Many systemic antibiotics use ribosomal inhibition to suppress the replication of bacteria. Current research suggests that resistance to macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin B (MLS(B)) antibiotics is emerging among clinical isolates of Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Erythromycin methylases, encoded by erm genes, modify an essential adenine residue in 23S rRNA and confer cross-resistance to MLS(B) antibiotics. More recently, macrolide efflux (mef) genes were identified in isolates of S. pyogenes and S. pneumoniae that show resistance to 14- and 15-membered macrolides (M phenotype). Resistance to MLSB has been associated with the increased use of erythromycin, and the recent emergence of the M phenotype has coincided with the marketing of newer macrolides. However, despite increasing macrolide resistance among clinical isolates of S. pneumoniae, convincing data on treatment failures directly attributable to MLS(B) or M phenotypes are limited. Possible solutions to emerging MLS(B) and M phenotype resistance include the introduction of alternative antibiotics, the more prudent use of antibiotics, combination therapy, molecular diagnostics, enhanced understanding of pharmacodynamic variables, and redefined resistance breakpoints.

Synthesis and antibacterial activity of HMR 3647 a new ketolide highly potent against erythromycin-resistant and susceptible pathogens

In the search for new ketolides with improved activities against erythromycin-resistant S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae we synthesized a new 11,12 carbamate ketolide substituted by an imidazo-pyridyl side chain: HMR 3647. This compound demonstrated a potent activity against erythromycin susceptible and resistant pathogens, including penicillin G/erythromycin A-resistant S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae. In vivo, HMR 3647 displayed good pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax = 2.9 microg/ml, bioavailability=49%, AUC0.8 = 17.2 microg.h/l, t1/2=1h) and was shown to have a high therapeutic efficacy in mice infected by various respiratory pathogens, including multi-resistant S. pneumoniae and Gram negative bacteria such as H. influenzae. HMR 3647 appears to be a very promising agent for the treatment of respiratory infections and is currently in clinical trials.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of clarithromycin

Clarithromycin is a macrolide antibacterial that differs in chemical structure from erythromycin by the methylation of the hydroxyl group at position 6 on the lactone ring. The pharmacokinetic advantages that clarithromycin has over erythromycin include increased oral bioavailability (52 to 55%), increased plasma concentrations (mean maximum concentrations ranged from 1.01 to 1.52 mg/L and 2.41 to 2.85 mg/L after multiple 250 and 500 mg doses, respectively), and a longer elimination half-life (3.3 to 4.9 hours) to allow twice daily administration. In addition, clarithromycin has extensive diffusion into saliva, sputum, lung tissue, epithelial lining fluid, alveolar macrophages, neutrophils, tonsils, nasal mucosa and middle ear fluid. Clarithromycin is primarily metabolised by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A isozymes and has an active metabolite, 14-hydroxyclarithromycin. The reported mean values of total body clearance and renal clearance in adults have ranged from 29.2 to 58.1 L/h and 6.7 to 12.8 L/h, respectively. In patients with severe renal impairment, increased plasma concentrations and a prolonged elimination half-life for clarithromycin and its metabolite have been reported. A dosage adjustment for clarithromycin should be considered in patients with a creatinine clearance < 1.8 L/h. The recommended goal for dosage regimens of clarithromycin is to ensure that the time that unbound drug concentrations in the blood remains above the minimum inhibitory concentration is at least 40 to 60% of the dosage interval. However, the concentrations and in vitro activity of 14-hydroxyclarithromycin must be considered for pathogens such as Haemophilus influenzae. In addition, clarithromycin achieves significantly higher drug concentrations in the epithelial lining fluid and alveolar macrophages, the potential sites of extracellular and intracellular respiratory tract pathogens, respectively. Further studies are needed to determine the importance of these concentrations of clarithromycin at the site of infection. Clarithromycin can increase the steady-state concentrations of drugs that are primarily depend upon CYP3A metabolism (e.g., astemidole, cisapride, pimozide, midazolam and triazolam). This can be clinically important for drugs that have a narrow therapeutic index, such as carbamazepine, cyclosporin, digoxin, theophylline and warfarin. Potent inhibitors of CYP3A (e.g., omeprazole and ritonavir) may also alter the metabolism of clarithromycin and its metabolites. Rifampicin (rifampin) and rifabutin are potent enzyme inducers and several small studies have suggested that these agents may significantly decrease serum clarithromycin concentrations. Overall, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies suggest that fewer serious drug interactions occur with clarithromycin compared with older macrolides such as erythromycin and troleandomycin.