Room for improvement: a systematic review of the quality of evaluations of interventions to improve hospital antibiotic prescribing

Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients

BACKGROUND

Up to 50% of antibiotic usage in hospitals is inappropriate. In hospitals infections caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria are associated with higher mortality, morbidity and prolonged hospital stay compared with infections caused by antibiotic-susceptible bacteria. Clostridium difficile associated diarrhoea (CDAD) is a hospital acquired infection that is caused by antibiotic prescribing.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the effectiveness of professional interventions that alone, or in combination, are effective in promoting prudent antibiotic prescribing to hospital inpatients, to evaluate the impact of these interventions on reducing the incidence of antimicrobial resistant pathogens or CDAD and their impact on clinical outcome.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) specialized register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE from 1980 to November 2003. Additional studies were obtained from the bibliographies of retrieved articles

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised and controlled clinical trials (RCT/CCT), controlled before and after studies (CBA) and interrupted time series (ITS) studies of antibiotic prescribing to hospital inpatients. Interventions included any professional or structural interventions as defined by EPOC.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers extracted data and assessed quality.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty six studies were included and 51 (77%) showed a significant improvement in at least one outcome. Six interventions only aimed to increase treatment, 57 interventions aimed to decrease treatment and three interventions aimed to both increase and decrease treatment. The intervention target was the decision to prescribe antibiotics (one study), timing of first dose (six studies), the regimen (drug, dosing interval etc, 61 studies) or the duration of treatment (10 studies); 12 studies had more than one target. Of the six interventions that aimed to increase treatment, five reported a significant improvement in drug outcomes and one a significant improvement in clinical outcome. Of the 60 interventions that aimed to decrease treatment 47 reported drug outcomes of which 38 (81%) significantly improved, 16 reported microbiological outcomes of which 12 (75%) significantly improved and nine reported clinical outcomes of which two (22%) significantly deteriorated and 3 (33%) significantly improved. Five studies aimed to reduce CDAD. Three showed a significant reduction in CDAD. Due to differences in study design and duration of follow up it was only possible to perform meta-regression on a few studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The results show that interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing to hospital inpatients are successful, and can reduce antimicrobial resistance or hospital acquired infections.

Quality improvement of surgical prophylaxis in Dutch hospitals: evaluation of a multi-site intervention by time series analysis

OBJECTIVES

Misuse of antibiotics in surgical prophylaxis is still quite common. The objectives of this study were to reduce the quantity and improve the quality of surgical prophylaxis and to reduce costs.

METHODS

Prospective multi-site study of elective procedures in 13 Dutch hospitals. The quality of prophylaxis was audited before and after an intervention consisting of performance feedback and implementation of national clinical practice guidelines. Process outcome parameters were antibiotic choice, duration, timing, antibiotic volume and costs. Segmented regression analysis was used to estimate the effect size of the intervention. Patient outcome was documented by the incidence of surgical site infections (SSI).

RESULTS

Before the intervention, 1763 procedures were recorded and 2050 thereafter. Antimicrobial use decreased from 121 to 79 DDD (defined daily doses)/100 procedures and costs reduced by 25% per procedure. After the intervention, antibiotic choice was inappropriate in only 37.5% of the cases instead of in 93.5% expected cases had the intervention not occurred. Prolonged prophylaxis was observed in 31.4% instead of 46.8% expected cases and inappropriate timing in 39.4% instead of the expected 51.8%. Time series analysis showed that all improvements were statistically significant (P < 0.01) and that they could be fully attributed to the intervention. The overall SSI rates before and after intervention were 5.4% (95% CI: 4.3-6.5) and 4.6% (95% CI: 3.6-5.4), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The intervention led to improved quality of surgical prophylaxis and to reduced antibiotic use and costs without impairment of patient outcome.

Antibiotic prescribing for children with nasopharyngitis (common colds), upper respiratory infections, and bronchitis who have health-professional parents

OBJECTIVE

Antibiotic resistance might be reduced if patients could be better informed regarding the lack of benefits of antibiotics for children with viral infections and avoid antibiotic prescriptions in these circumstances. This study investigated whether children having health professionals as parents, a group whose parents are expected to have more medical knowledge and expertise, are less likely than other children to receive antibiotics for nasopharyngitis (common colds), upper respiratory tract infections (URIs), and acute bronchitis.

METHODS

Retrospective analyses were conducted by using National Health Insurance data for children of physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and non-health personnel, who had visited hospital outpatient departments or physician clinics for common colds, URIs, and acute bronchitis in Taiwan in 2000. A total of 53733 episodes of care for common colds, URIs, and acute bronchitis in a nationally representative sample of children (aged < or =18 years) living in nonremote areas were analyzed.

RESULTS

The study found that, after adjusting for characteristics of the children (demographic, socioeconomic, and health status) and the treating physicians (demographic, practice style, and setting), children with a physician (odds ratio [OR]: 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36-0.68) or a pharmacist (OR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.52-0.91) as a parent were significantly less likely than other children to receive antibiotic prescriptions. The likelihood of receiving an antibiotic for the children of nurses (OR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.77-1.09) was similar to that for children in the comparison group.

CONCLUSIONS

This finding supports our hypothesis that better parental education does help to reduce the frequency of injudicious antibiotic prescribing. Medical knowledge alone, however, may not fully reduce the overuse of antibiotics. Physician-parents, the expected medically savvy parents, can serve as a benchmark for the improvement potentially achievable in Taiwan through a combination of educational, regulatory, communication, and policy efforts targeted at more appropriate antibiotic prescribing in ambulatory settings.

Minimising antibiotic resistance

The problems associated with antibiotic resistance have led to several agency and governmental reports since 1998, along with many sets of usage guidelines. These documents stress the desirability of reducing antimicrobial prescribing, which has subsequently fallen in several countries, including the UK. However, the evidence for any contingent reduction in resistance is scanty, and several pathogens--notably Escherichia coli--are becoming markedly more resistant. Thus, rather than being overly optimistic about the benefits of reducing antimicrobial prescriptions, we must also emphasise the use of those antibiotics that prove less prone to select resistance. Furthermore, we must be careful that guidelines are not so narrow as to rail-road prescribing and its contingent selection pressure in single directions--as happened with gonorrhoea--and to consider the likelihood that limited diverse prescribing may have the least detrimental effect upon the resistance ecology. Last, there is a need to re-invigorate antimicrobial development, which has been downgraded by many major pharmaceutical houses.

Decreasing antibiotic overuse in neonatal intensive care units: quality improvement research

Overutilization of antibiotics and emergence of resistant bacteria are important problems, particularly in intensive care units. To date, reproducible interventions to improve antibiotic utilization in hospitals have not been proven to be effective or safe. Evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, and health information technology are frequently promoted as means to cross the "quality chasm" described by the Institute of Medicine. This article outlines how these approaches intersect in a strategy for quality improvement research evaluating the safety and effectiveness of clinical practice guidelines designed to improve antibiotic use in neonatal intensive care units.

A Systematic Review of Quasi-Experimental Study Designs in the Fields of Infection Control and Antibiotic Resistance

We performed a systematic review of articles published during a 2-year period in 4 journals in the field of infectious diseases to determine the extent to which the quasi-experimental study design is used to evaluate infection control and antibiotic resistance. We evaluated studies on the basis of the following criteria: type of quasi-experimental study design used, justification of the use of the design, use of correct nomenclature to describe the design, and recognition of potential limitations of the design. A total of 73 articles featured a quasi-experimental study design. Twelve (16%) were associated with a quasi-experimental design involving a control group. Three (4%) provided justification for the use of the quasi-experimental study design. Sixteen (22%) used correct nomenclature to describe the study. Seventeen (23%) mentioned at least 1 of the potential limitations of the use of a quasi-experimental study design. The quasi-experimental study is used frequently in studies of infection control and antibiotic resistance. Efforts to improve the conduct and presentation of quasi-experimental studies are urgently needed to more rigorously evaluate interventions.

Improving compliance with hospital antibiotic guidelines: a time-series intervention analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the impact of a combined intervention strategy to improve antimicrobial prescribing at University Hospital Groningen. For the intervention, the antimicrobial treatment guidelines were updated and disseminated in paperback and electronic format. The credibility of the guidelines was improved by consultation with users. In a second phase, academic detailing (AD) was used to improve specific areas of low compliance with the guidelines.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prescribing data were prospectively collected for 2869 patients receiving 7471 prescriptions for an antimicrobial for an infection covered by the guidelines between July 2001 and September 2003. After collection of baseline data, the guidelines were actively disseminated in February 2002. Next, after a 5 month interval, a second intervention, i.e. an AD approach, addressed suboptimal prescribing of ciprofloxacin and co-amoxiclav. Segmented regression analysis was used to analyse the interrupted time-series data.

RESULTS

At baseline, compliance with the drug choice guidelines was 67%. The first intervention showed a significant change in the level of compliance of +15.5% (95% CI: 8%; 23%). AD did not lead to statistically significant additional changes in already high levels +12.5% (95% CI:-3%; 28%) of compliance. Post-intervention compliance was stable at 86%.

CONCLUSIONS

Updating the guidelines in close collaboration with the specialists involved followed by active dissemination proved to be an efficient way to improve compliance with guideline recommendations. An 86% compliance level was achieved in this study without compulsory measures. A ceiling effect may have limited the added value of AD.

Community-based outpatient practice of antibiotics use in Tehran

OBJECTIVES

To study patterns of outpatient antibiotic use in the Great Tehran, in order to develop interventional strategies in rationalizing drug and especially antibiotic use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten-percent random sample of all prescription belonging to practitioners in south of Tehran and kept in a data bank was sampled. Drug use indicators were determined in order to develop intervention program to promote rational drug use among practitioners in Tehran. Based on the values of drug use indicators, an interventional program, a program of continuing medical education (CME) targeting rational use of drugs, was designed. Eighty general practitioners (GPs) who contributed to the data bank were selected and allocated to two groups, intervention group and control group. Each group contained 40 GPs. Drug use indicators were measured in each group three times; before and in two intervals after the intervention. The indicators were compared before and after as well as between groups.

RESULTS

The drug use indicators determined through the data bank showed that 19% of all prescribed drugs in data bank were antibiotics, which ranked second only after 'analgesics and CNS drugs' with 24%. The drug use indicators were improved in the intervention group (the average number of drugs per encounter lowered from 4.3 +/- 0.5 pre-intervention to 3.6 +/- 0.1 six months thereafter, p value = 0.001). The percentage of encounters with an antibiotic prescribed were lowered in intervention group compared with control group but the difference was not statistically significant. The intervention made a change to all other measured indicators but not all of them were statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Irrational use of antibiotics can improve by appropriate educational intervention, using CME programs.

Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs as a Means to Optimize Antimicrobial Use

Each year, approximately 2 million people in the United States contract an infection during a hospital stay. An increasing percentage of these institutionally acquired infections are attributed to antimicrobial-resistant organisms. At the same time, studies and surveys suggest that as much as half of all antimicrobial use is inappropriate. Recommendations for preventing and reducing antimicrobial resistance in hospitals stress the importance of improving antimicrobial use, referred to as antimicrobial stewardship, at the institutional level. Antimicrobial stewardship programs have served as wake-up calls to both clinicians and health care administrators. We review the more recent literature concerning the impact of antimicrobial stewardship programs on costs, outcomes, and resistance and summarize important considerations for implementation of these programs.

Report from the European Conference on the Role of Research in Combating Antibiotic Resistance, 2003

Europe has been at the forefront of efforts to control antibiotic resistance, and this globally important health care problem has prompted numerous recommendations for action at both the national and international levels. Starting in 2002, research on antimicrobial resistance has been considered to be one of the specific objectives of the Sixth Framework Programme (FP6) within the European Union. This report summarises the plenary presentations, as well as the findings of six Working Groups covering specific areas of antibiotic resistance, given at a conference in November 2003 entitled 'The Role of Research in Combating Antibiotic Resistance', co-organised by the European Union and the European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, and held in Rome under the patronage of the Italian government.