HuR protein attenuates miRNA-mediated repression by promoting miRISC dissociation from the target RNA

The role of mammalian MAPK signaling in regulation of cytokine mRNA stability and translation

Extracellular-regulated kinases and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases are activated in innate (and adaptive) immunity and signal via different routes to alter the stability and translation of various cytokine mRNAs, enabling immune cells to respond promptly. This regulation involves mRNA elements, such as AU-rich motifs, and mRNA-binding proteins, such as tristetraprolin (TTP), HuR, and hnRNPK-homology (KH) type splicing regulatory protein (KSRP). Signal-dependent phosphorylation of mRNA-binding proteins often alters their subcellular localization or RNA-binding affinity. Furthermore, it could lead to an altered interaction with other mRNA-binding proteins and altered scaffolding properties for mRNA-modifying enzymes, such as deadenylases, polyadenylases, decapping enzymes, poly(A) binding proteins, exo- or endonucleases, and proteins of the exosome machinery. In many cases, this results in unstable mRNAs being stabilized, with their translational arrest being released and cytokine production being stimulated. Hence, components of these mechanisms are potential targets for the modulation of the inflammatory response.

Posttranscriptional adaptations of the vascular endothelium to hypoxia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Remarkable new advances have been made in the field of posttranscriptional gene regulation over recent years. These include the revelation of noncoding RNAs, such as microRNAs, antisense transcripts and their interactions with RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) in the context of both health and disease settings, such as hypoxia. In particular, these discoveries bear much relevance to the field of vascular biology, which historically has focused upon transcriptional processes. Thus, the contributions of these posttranscriptional gene regulatory mechanisms to vascular and endothelial biology represent a newer concept that warrants discussion.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have revealed two emerging themes that are critical to endothelial/vascular biology and function. First is the functional integration between the microRNA pathway and the cellular hypoxic response, which, in addition to specific microRNAs, involves key components of the microRNA biogenesis machinery. A key concept here is the regulation of a master transcriptional programme through posttranscriptional mechanisms. The second major theme involves the dynamic interactions between RBPs, microRNAs and antisense RNAs. The condition-dependent collaborations and competitions between these different classes of posttranscriptional regulators reveal a critical layer of control for gene expression.

SUMMARY

Taken together, these findings bear significant diagnostic and therapeutic implications for vascular disease.

Roquin binds microRNA-146a and Argonaute2 to regulate microRNA homeostasis

Roquin is an RNA-binding protein that prevents autoimmunity and inflammation via repression of bound target mRNAs such as inducible costimulator (Icos). When Roquin is absent or mutated (Roquin^san), Icos is overexpressed in T cells. Here we show that Roquin enhances Dicer-mediated processing of pre-miR-146a. Roquin also directly binds Argonaute2, a central component of the RNA-induced silencing complex, and miR-146a, a microRNA that targets Icos mRNA. In the absence of functional Roquin, miR-146a accumulates in T cells. Its accumulation is not due to increased transcription or processing, rather due to enhanced stability of mature miR-146a. This is associated with decreased 3′ end uridylation of the miRNA. Crystallographic studies reveal that Roquin contains a unique HEPN domain and identify the structural basis of the ‘san’ mutation and Roquin’s ability to bind multiple RNAs. Roquin emerges as a protein that can bind Ago2, miRNAs and target mRNAs, to control homeostasis of both RNA species.

Roquin is an RNA-binding protein that promotes the degradation of specific mRNAs and is crucial for the maintenance of peripheral immune tolerance. Here the authors show that, in addition to its target mRNAs, Roquin can bind miR-146a and the RISC component Ago2 to control homeostasis of both RNA species.

Polycomb YY1 is a critical interface between epigenetic code and miRNA machinery after exposure to hypoxia in malignancy

Yin Yang 1 (YY1) is a member of polycomb protein family involved in epigenetic modifications and transcriptional controls. We have shown that YY1 acts as positive regulator of tumor growth and angiogenesis by interfering with the VEGFA network. Yet, the link between polycomb chromatin complex and hypoxia regulation of VEGFA is still poorly understood. Here, we establish that hypoxia impairs YY1 binding to VEGFA mRNA 3'UTR (p<0.001) in bone malignancy. Moreover, RNA immunoprecipitation reveals the formation of triplex nuclear complexes among YY1, VEGFA DNA, mRNA, and unreached about 200 fold primiRNA 200b and 200c via Dicer protein. In this complex, YY1 is necessary to maintain the steady-state level of VEGFA expression while its silencing increases VEGFA mRNA half-life at 4 h and impairs the maturation of miRNA 200b/c. Hypoxia promotes histone modification through ubiquitination both of YY1 and Dicer proteins. Hypoxia-mediated down-regulation of YY1 and Dicer changes post-transcriptional VEGFA regulation by resulting in the accumulation of primiRNA200b/c in comparison to mature miRNAs (p<0.001). Given the regulatory functions of VEGFA on cellular activities to promote neoangiogenesis, we conclude that YY1 acts as novel critical interface between epigenetic code and miRNAs machinery under chronic hypoxia in malignancy.

Polysome arrest restricts miRNA turnover by preventing exosomal export of miRNA in growth-retarded mammalian cells

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are tiny posttranscriptional regulators of gene expression in metazoan cells, where activity and abundance of miRNAs are tightly controlled. Regulated turnover of these regulatory RNAs is important to optimize cellular response to external stimuli. We report that the stability of mature miRNAs increases inversely with cell proliferation, and the increased number of microribonucleoproteins (miRNPs) in growth-restricted mammalian cells are in turn associated with polysomes. This heightened association of miRNA with polysomes also elicits reduced degradation of target mRNAs and impaired extracellular export of miRNA via exosomes. Overall polysome sequestration contributes to an increase of cellular miRNA levels but without an increase in miRNA activity. Therefore miRNA activity and turnover can be controlled by subcellular distribution of miRNPs that may get differentially regulated as a function of cell growth in mammalian cells.

RNA epigenetics

Mammalian messenger RNA (mRNA) and long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) contain tens of thousands of posttranscriptional chemical modifications. Among these, the N(6)-methyl-adenosine (m(6)A) modification is the most abundant and can be removed by specific mammalian enzymes. m(6)A modification is recognized by families of RNA binding proteins that affect many aspects of mRNA function. mRNA/lncRNA modification represents another layer of epigenetic regulation of gene expression, analogous to DNA methylation and histone modification.

Upregulated sirtuin 1 by miRNA-34a is required for smooth muscle cell differentiation from pluripotent stem cells

microRNA-34a (miR-34a) and sirtuin 1 (SirT1) have been extensively studied in tumour biology and longevity/aging, but little is known about their functional roles in smooth muscle cell (SMC) differentiation from pluripotent stem cells. Using well-established SMC differentiation models, we have demonstrated that miR-34a has an important role in SMC differentiation from murine and human embryonic stem cells. Surprisingly, deacetylase sirtuin 1 (SirT1), one of the top predicted targets, was positively regulated by miR-34a during SMC differentiation. Mechanistically, we demonstrated that miR-34a promoted differentiating stem cells' arrest at G0/G1 phase and observed a significantly decreased incorporation of miR-34a and SirT1 RNA into Ago2-RISC complex upon SMC differentiation. Importantly, we have identified SirT1 as a transcriptional activator in the regulation of SMC gene programme. Finally, our data showed that SirT1 modulated the enrichment of H3K9 tri-methylation around the SMC gene-promoter regions. Taken together, our data reveal a specific regulatory pathway that miR-34a positively regulates its target gene SirT1 in a cellular context-dependent and sequence-specific manner and suggest a functional role for this pathway in SMC differentiation from stem cells in vitro and in vivo.

Dosage and temporal thresholds in microRNA proteomics

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) modulate protein and mRNA expression through translational repression and/or mRNA decay. In this study, we combined SILAC-based proteomics and RNAseq to identify primary targets based on measurements of protein and mRNA repression and analysis of transcript 3'UTR sequences. The primary target set was used to compare different prediction algorithms, revealing higher stringency of selection by Targetscan and PITA compared with miRanda, at the expense of higher false negatives. A key finding was that significant and unexpected variations occurred in the kinetics of repression as well as the sensitivity to exogeneous miRNA concentration. Bimodal thresholds were observed, which distinguished responses to low (10 nm) versus high (50-100 nm) miRNA, as well as the onset of repression at early (12-18 h) versus late (36-48 h) times. Similar behavior was seen at the transcript level with respect to kinetics of repression. The differential thresholds were most strongly correlated with ΔΔG, the net free energy of miRNA-target interactions, which mainly reflected inverse correlations with ΔGopen, the free energy of forming 3'UTR secondary structures, at or nearby the miRNA seed matching sites. Thus, our working model is that protein binding or other competitive mechanisms variably interfere with the accessibility of miRISC to the transcript binding site. In addition, biphasic responses were observed in a subset of proteins that were partially down-regulated at early times, and further down-regulated at later times. Taken together, our findings provide evidence for varying modes of miRNA target repression, which lead to different thresholds of target responses with respect to kinetics and concentration, and predict that certain transcripts will show graded responses in sensitivity and fold-change under cellular conditions that lead to varying steady state miRNA levels.

Meet the players: local translation at the synapse

It is widely believed that activity-dependent synaptic plasticity is the basis for learning and memory. Both processes are dependent on new protein synthesis at the synapse. Here, we describe a mechanism how dendritic mRNAs are transported and subsequently translated at activated synapses. Furthermore, we present the players involved in the regulation of local dendritic translation upon neuronal stimulation and their molecular interplay that maintain local proteome homeostasis. Any dysregulation causes several types of neurological disorders including muscular atrophies, cancers, neuropathies, neurodegenerative, and cognitive disorders.

Regulation of Cardiac Cell Fate by microRNAs: Implications for Heart Regeneration

microRNAs are post-transcriptional regulators of gene expression that have been shown to be central players in the establishment of cellular programs, often acting as switches that control the choice between proliferation and differentiation during development and in adult tissues. The heart develops from two small patches of cells in the mesoderm, the heart fields, which originate the different cardiac cell types, including cardiomyocytes, vascular smooth muscle and endothelial cells. These progenitors proliferate and differentiate to establish a highly connected three-dimensional structure, involving a robust succession of gene expression programs strongly influenced by microRNAs. Although the mammalian heart has conventionally been viewed as a post-mitotic organ, cardiac cells have recently been shown to display some regenerative potential, which is nonetheless insufficient to regenerate heart lesions, in contrast with other vertebrates like the zebrafish. Both the proliferation of adult cardiac stem cells and the ability of cardiomyocytes to re-enter the cell cycle have been proposed to sustain these regenerative processes. Here we review the role of microRNAs in the control of stem cell and cardiomyocyte dependent cardiac regeneration processes, and discuss potential applications for the treatment of cardiac injury.

The complexity of miRNA-mediated repression

Since their discovery 20 years ago, miRNAs have attracted much attention from all areas of biology. These short (∼22 nt) non-coding RNA molecules are highly conserved in evolution and are present in nearly all eukaryotes. They have critical roles in virtually every cellular process, particularly determination of cell fate in development and regulation of the cell cycle. Although it has long been known that miRNAs bind to mRNAs to trigger translational repression and degradation, there had been much debate regarding their precise mode of action. It is now believed that translational control is the primary event, only later followed by mRNA destabilisation. This review will discuss the most recent advances in our understanding of the molecular underpinnings of miRNA-mediated repression. Moreover, we highlight the multitude of regulatory mechanisms that modulate miRNA function.

The iron-sensing aconitase B binds its own mRNA to prevent sRNA-induced mRNA cleavage

Aconitase is an iron–sulfur protein and a major enzyme of the TCA cycle that catalyzes the conversion of citrate to isocitrate under iron-rich conditions. In Escherichia coli, aconitase B (AcnB) is a typical moonlighting protein that can switch to its apo form (apo-AcnB) which favors binding its own mRNA 3′UTR and stabilize it when intracellular iron become scarce. The small regulatory RNA (sRNA) RyhB has previously been shown to promote RNase E-dependent degradation of acnB mRNA when it was expressed from an ectopic arabinose-dependent promoter, independently of intracellular iron levels. In marked contrast, we report here that expression of RyhB under low-iron conditions did not result in acnB mRNA degradation even when RyhB was bound to acnB ribosome binding site (RBS). Genetic and biochemical evidence suggested that, under low-iron conditions, apo-AcnB bound to acnB 3′UTR close to a RNase E cleavage site that is essential for RyhB-induced acnB mRNA degradation. Whereas RyhB can block acnB translation initiation, RNase E-dependent degradation of acnB was prevented by apo-AcnB binding close to the cleavage site. This previously uncharacterized regulation suggests an intricate post-transcriptional mechanism that represses protein expression while insuring mRNA stability.

Principles and properties of eukaryotic mRNPs

The proper processing, export, localization, translation, and degradation of mRNAs are necessary for regulation of gene expression. These processes are controlled by mRNA-specific regulatory proteins, noncoding RNAs, and core machineries common to most mRNAs. These factors bind the mRNA in large complexes known as messenger ribonucleoprotein particles (mRNPs). Herein, we review the components of mRNPs, how they assemble and rearrange, and how mRNP composition differentially affects mRNA biogenesis, function, and degradation. We also describe how properties of the mRNP "interactome" lead to emergent principles affecting the control of gene expression.

HuR and miR-1192 regulate myogenesis by modulating the translation of HMGB1 mRNA

Upon muscle injury, the high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) protein is upregulated and secreted to initiate reparative responses. Here we show that HMGB1 controls myogenesis both in vitro and in vivo during development and after adult muscle injury. HMGB1 expression in muscle cells is regulated at the translational level: the miRNA miR-1192 inhibits HMGB1 translation and the RNA-binding protein HuR promotes it. HuR binds to a cis-element, HuR binding sites (HuRBS), located in the 3'UTR of the HMGB1 transcript, and at the same time miR-1192 is recruited to an adjacent seed element. The binding of HuR to the HuRBS prevents the recruitment of Argonaute 2 (Ago2), overriding miR-1192-mediated translation inhibition. Depleting HuR reduces myoblast fusion and silencing miR-1192 re-establishes the fusion potential of HuR-depleted cells. We propose that HuR promotes the commitment of myoblasts to myogenesis by enhancing the translation of HMGB1 and suppressing the translation inhibition mediated by miR-1192.

Non-coding RNA interact to regulate neuronal development and function

The human brain is one of the most complex biological systems, and the cognitive abilities have greatly expanded compared to invertebrates without much expansion in the number of protein coding genes. This suggests that gene regulation plays a very important role in the development and function of nervous system, by acting at multiple levels such as transcription and translation. In this article we discuss the regulatory roles of three classes of non-protein coding RNAs (ncRNAs)-microRNAs (miRNAs), piwi-interacting RNA (piRNAs) and long-non-coding RNA (lncRNA), in the process of neurogenesis and nervous function including control of synaptic plasticity and potential roles in neurodegenerative diseases. miRNAs are involved in diverse processes including neurogenesis where they channelize the cellular physiology toward neuronal differentiation. miRNAs can also indirectly influence neurogenesis by regulating the proliferation and self renewal of neural stem cells and are dysregulated in several neurodegenerative diseases. miRNAs are also known to regulate synaptic plasticity and are usually found to be co-expressed with their targets. The dynamics of gene regulation is thus dependent on the local architecture of the gene regulatory network (GRN) around the miRNA and its targets. piRNAs had been classically known to regulate transposons in the germ cells. However, piRNAs have been, recently, found to be expressed in the brain and possibly function by imparting epigenetic changes by DNA methylation. piRNAs are known to be maternally inherited and we assume that they may play a role in early development. We also explore the possible function of piRNAs in regulating the expansion of transposons in the brain. Brain is known to express several lncRNA but functional roles in brain development are attributed to a few lncRNA while functions of most of the them remain unknown. We review the roles of some known lncRNA and explore the other possible functions of lncRNAs including their interaction with miRNAs.

The panorama of miRNA-mediated mechanisms in mammalian cells

MicroRNAs comprise a large family of short, non-coding RNAs that are present in most eukaryotic organisms and are typically involved in downregulating the expression of protein-coding genes. The detailed mechanisms of miRNA functioning in animals and plants have been under investigation for more than decade. In mammalian cells, miRNA guides the effector complex miRISC to bind with partially complementary sequences, usually within the 3′UTR of mRNAs, and inhibit protein synthesis with or without transcript degradation. In addition to these main mechanisms, several other modes of miRNA-mediated gene expression regulation have been described, but their scale and importance remain a matter of debate. In this review, we briefly summarize the pathway of miRNA precursor processing during miRNA biogenesis and continue with the description of the miRISC assembly process. Then, we present the miRNA-mediated mechanisms of gene expression regulation in detail, and we gather information concerning the proteins involved in these processes. In addition, we briefly refer to the current applications of miRNA mechanisms in therapeutic strategies. Finally, we highlight some of the remaining controversies surrounding the regulation of mammalian gene expression by miRNAs.

A feedforward regulatory loop between HuR and the long noncoding RNA linc-MD1 controls early phases of myogenesis

The muscle-specific long noncoding RNA linc-MD1 was shown to be expressed during early phases of muscle differentiation and to trigger the switch to later stages by acting as a sponge for miR-133 and miR-135. Notably, linc-MD1 is also the host transcript of miR-133b, and their biogenesis is mutually exclusive. Here, we describe that this alternative synthesis is controlled by the HuR protein, which favors linc-MD1 accumulation through its ability to bind linc-MD1 and repress Drosha cleavage. We show that HuR is under the repressive control of miR-133 and that the sponging activity of linc-MD1 consolidates HuR expression in a feedforward positive loop. Finally, we show that HuR also acts in the cytoplasm, reinforcing linc-MD1 sponge activity by cooperating for miRNA recruitment. An increase in miR-133 synthesis, mainly from the two unrelated miR-133a coding genomic loci, is likely to trigger the exit from this circuitry and progression to later differentiation stages.

•

A feedforward positive loop exists between linc-MD1 and HuR during myogenesis

•

HuR controls the relative biogenesis of miR-133b and its host linc-MD1 RNA

•

Linc-MD1, by sponging miR-133, alleviates its repression on HuR expression

•

Cytoplasmic HuR reinforces linc-MD1 activity by cooperating for miRNA recruitment

N6-methyladenosine modification destabilizes developmental regulators in embryonic stem cells

N(6)-methyladenosine (m(6)A) has been identified as the most abundant internal modification of messenger RNA in eukaryotes. m(6)A modification is involved in cell fate determination in yeast and embryo development in plants. Its mammalian function remains unknown but thousands of mammalian mRNAs and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) show m(6)A modification and m(6)A demethylases are required for mammalian energy homeostasis and fertility. We identify two proteins, the putative m(6)A MTase, methyltransferase-like 3 (Mettl3; ref. ), and a related but uncharacterized protein Mettl14, that function synergistically to control m(6)A formation in mammalian cells. Knockdown of Mettl3 and Mettl14 in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) led to similar phenotypes, characterized by lack of m(6)A RNA methylation and lost self-renewal capability. A large number of transcripts, including many encoding developmental regulators, exhibit m(6)A methylation inversely correlated with mRNA stability and gene expression. The human antigen R (HuR) and microRNA pathways were linked to these effects. This gene regulatory mechanism operating in mESCs through m(6)A methylation is required to keep mESCs at their ground state and may be relevant to thousands of mRNAs and lncRNAs in various cell types.

Competition and collaboration between RNA-binding proteins and microRNAs

Posttranscriptional regulation of mRNA species represents a major regulatory checkpoint in the control of gene expression. Historically, RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) have been regarded as the primary regulators of mRNA stability and translation. More recently, however, microRNAs have emerged as a class of potent and pervasive posttranscriptional rheostats that similarly affect mRNA stability and translation. The observation that both microRNAs and RBPs regulate mRNA stability and translation has initiated a newer area of research that involves the examination of dynamic interactions between these two important classes of posttranscriptional regulators, the myriad of factors that influence these biological interactions, and ultimately, their effects on target mRNAs. Specifically, microRNAs and RBPs can act synergistically to effect mRNA destabilization and translational inhibition. They can also engage in competition with each other and exert opposing effects on target mRNAs. To date, several key studies have provided critical details regarding the mechanisms and principles of interaction between these molecules. Additionally, these findings raise important questions regarding the regulation of these interactions, including the roles of posttranslational modification, subcellular localization, target inhibition versus activation, and changes in expression levels of these regulatory factors, especially under stimulus- and cell-specific conditions. Indeed, further experimentation is warranted to address these key issues that pertain to the collaboration and competition between microRNAs and RBPs. Significantly, the elucidation of these important details bears critical implications for disease management, especially for those diseases in which these cellular factors are dysregulated.

Emerging roles of competing endogenous RNAs in cancer: insights from the regulation of PTEN

The capacity of noncoding RNA to regulate gene expression in health and disease is epitomized by the microRNAs, small ∼22-nucleotide RNAs that target mRNAs to repress their translation into protein. Recently a previously unrecognized gene regulatory layer has emerged, characterized by the ability of a wide range of RNA transcripts to vie for microRNA binding and alleviate the repressive effect of microRNAs on their mRNA targets. Termed competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs), these participate in a microRNA-dependent cross talk, producing robust networks that when perturbed may lead to cancer. To date, the tumor suppressor PTEN has been most extensively validated as competing with a variety of ceRNAs in different cancers: reducing these ceRNAs appears to reduce PTEN levels, tipping cells toward cancer progression. In this review we look at ceRNA networks in cancer, their characteristics, and constituent parts, focusing on the insights that can be gained from the studies conducted on PTEN. We also explore the conditions that facilitate ceRNA cross talk, proposing that the disruption of these conditions may represent a general phenomenon in carcinogenesis.

MoniTORing neuronal excitability at the synapse

Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a key player at the synapse regulating local translation and long-lasting synaptic plasticity. Now, a new study by Sosanya et al. (2013. J. Cell Biol.http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201212089) investigates the molecular mechanism of how mTOR suppresses local protein synthesis of a key potassium channel at activated synapses.

Degradation of high affinity HuD targets releases Kv1.1 mRNA from miR-129 repression by mTORC1

Little is known about how a neuron undergoes site-specific changes in intrinsic excitability during neuronal activity. We provide evidence for a novel mechanism for mTORC1 kinase-dependent translational regulation of the voltage-gated potassium channel Kv1.1 messenger RNA (mRNA). We identified a microRNA, miR-129, that repressed Kv1.1 mRNA translation when mTORC1 was active. When mTORC1 was inactive, we found that the RNA-binding protein, HuD, bound to Kv1.1 mRNA and promoted its translation. Unexpectedly, inhibition of mTORC1 activity did not alter levels of miR-129 and HuD to favor binding to Kv1.1 mRNA. However, reduced mTORC1 signaling caused the degradation of high affinity HuD target mRNAs, freeing HuD to bind Kv1.1 mRNA. Hence, mTORC1 activity regulation of mRNA stability and high affinity HuD-target mRNA degradation mediates the bidirectional expression of dendritic Kv1.1 ion channels.

Nucleolin mediates microRNA-directed CSF-1 mRNA deadenylation but increases translation of CSF-1 mRNA

CSF-1 mRNA 3'UTR contains multiple unique motifs, including a common microRNA (miRNA) target in close proximity to a noncanonical G-quadruplex and AU-rich elements (AREs). Using a luciferase reporter system fused to CSF-1 mRNA 3'UTR, disruption of the miRNA target region, G-quadruplex, and AREs together dramatically increased reporter RNA levels, suggesting important roles for these cis-acting regulatory elements in the down-regulation of CSF-1 mRNA. We find that nucleolin, which binds both G-quadruplex and AREs, enhances deadenylation of CSF-1 mRNA, promoting CSF-1 mRNA decay, while having the capacity to increase translation of CSF-1 mRNA. Through interaction with the CSF-1 3'UTR miRNA common target, we find that miR-130a and miR-301a inhibit CSF-1 expression by enhancing mRNA decay. Silencing of nucleolin prevents the miRNA-directed mRNA decay, indicating a requirement for nucleolin in miRNA activity on CSF-1 mRNA. Downstream effects followed by miR-130a and miR-301a inhibition of directed cellular motility of ovarian cancer cells were found to be dependent on nucleolin. The paradoxical effects of nucleolin on miRNA-directed CSF-1 mRNA deadenylation and on translational activation were explored further. The nucleolin protein contains four acidic stretches, four RNA recognition motifs (RRMs), and nine RGG repeats. All three domains in nucleolin regulate CSF-1 mRNA and protein levels. RRMs increase CSF-1 mRNA, whereas the acidic and RGG domains decrease CSF-1 protein levels. This suggests that nucleolin has the capacity to differentially regulate both CSF-1 RNA and protein levels. Our finding that nucleolin interacts with Ago2 indirectly via RNA and with poly(A)-binding protein C (PABPC) directly suggests a nucleolin-Ago2-PABPC complex formation on mRNA. This complex is in keeping with our suggestion that nucleolin may work with PABPC as a double-edged sword on both mRNA deadenylation and translational activation. Our findings underscore the complexity of nucleolin's actions on CSF-1 mRNA and describe the dependence of miR-130a- and miR-301a-directed CSF-1 mRNA decay and inhibition of ovarian cancer cell motility on nucleolin.

MicroRNAs: Essential players in the regulation of inflammation

Regulation of inflammatory responses is ensured by coordinated control of gene expression in participating immune system and tissue cells. One group of gene expression regulators, the functions of which have recently been started to be uncovered in relation to any type of inflammatory condition, is a class of short single-stranded RNA molecules termed microRNAs (miRNAs). miRNAs function together with partner proteins and mainly cause gene silencing through degradation of target mRNAs or inhibition of translation. A particular miRNA can have hundreds of target genes, and thereby miRNAs together influence the expression of a large proportion of proteins. The role of miRNAs in the immune system has been extensively studied since the discovery of miRNAs in mammalian cells approximately 10 years ago. The purpose of the current review is to provide an overview on the functions of miRNAs in the regulation of inflammation, with a specific focus on the mechanisms of allergic inflammation. Because recent studies clearly demonstrate the presence of extracellular miRNAs in body fluids and propose the involvement of miRNAs in cell-cell communication, we will also highlight findings about functions of extracellular miRNAs. The possible use of miRNAs as biomarkers, as well as miRNA-related novel treatment modalities, might open a new future for the diagnosis and treatment of many inflammatory conditions, including allergic diseases.

microRNAs and RNA-binding proteins: a complex network of interactions and reciprocal regulations in cancer

In the last decade, an ever-growing number of connections between microRNAs (miRNAs) and RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) have uncovered a new level of complexity of gene expression regulation in cancer. In this review, we examine several aspects of the functional interactions between miRNAs and RBPs in cancer models. We will provide examples of reciprocal regulation: miRNAs regulating the expression of RBPs, or the converse, where an RNA-binding protein specifically regulates the expression of a specific miRNA, or when an RBP can exert a widespread effect on miRNAs via the modulation of a key protein for miRNA production or function. Moreover, we will focus on the ever-growing number of functional interactions that have been discovered in the last few years: RBPs that were shown to cooperate with microRNAs in the downregulation of shared target mRNAs or, on the contrary, that inhibit microRNA action, thus resulting in a protection of the specific target mRNAs. We surely need to obtain a deeper comprehension of such intricate networks to have a chance of understanding and, thus, fighting cancer.

All three RNA recognition motifs and the hinge region of HuC play distinct roles in the regulation of alternative splicing

The four Hu [embryonic lethal abnormal vision-like (ELAVL)] protein family members regulate alternative splicing by binding to U-rich sequences surrounding target exons and affecting the interaction of the splicing machinery and/or local chromatin modifications. Each of the Hu proteins contains a divergent N-terminus, three highly conserved RNA recognition motifs (RRM1, RRM2 and RRM3) and a hinge region separating RRM2 and RRM3. The roles of each domain in splicing regulation are not well understood. Here, we investigate how HuC, a relatively poorly characterized family member, regulates three target pre-mRNAs: neurofibromatosis type I, Fas and HuD. We find that the HuC N-terminus is dispensable for splicing regulation, and the three RRMs are required for splicing regulation of each target, whereas the hinge region contributes to regulation of only some targets. Interestingly, the regions of the hinge and RRM3 required for regulating different targets only partially overlap, implying substrate-specific mechanisms of HuC-mediated splicing regulation. We show that RRM1 and RRM2 are required for binding to target pre-mRNAs, whereas the hinge and RRM3 are required for HuC–HuC self-interaction. Finally, we find that the portions of RRM3 required for HuC–HuC interaction overlap with those required for splicing regulation of all three targets, suggesting a role of HuC–HuC interaction in splicing regulation.

mRNA fate: Life and death of the mRNA in the cytoplasm

The life of an mRNA molecule begins with transcription and ultimately ends in degradation. In the course of its life, however, mRNA is examined, modified in various ways and transported before eventually being translated into proteins. All these processes are performed by proteins and non-coding RNAs whose complex interplay in the cell contributes to determining the proteome changes and the phenotype of cells. On May 23‒26, 2012, over 150 scientists from around the world convened in the sunny shores of Riva del Garda, Italy, for the workshop entitled: "mRNA fate: Life and Death of mRNA in the Cytoplasm." Sessions included mRNA trafficking, mRNA translational control, RNA metabolism and disease, RNA-protein structures and systems biology of RNA. This report highlights some of the prominent and recurring themes at the meeting and emerging arenas of future research.

Mechanisms coordinating ELAV/Hu mRNA regulons

The 5' and 3' untranslated regions (UTRs) of messenger RNAs (mRNAs) function as platforms that can determine the fate of each mRNA individually and in aggregate. Multiple mRNAs that encode proteins that are functionally related often interact with RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) and noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) that coordinate their expression in time and space as RNA regulons within the ribonucleoprotein (RNP) infrastructure we term the ribonome. Recent ribonomic methods have emerged that can determine which mRNAs are bound and regulated by RBPs and ncRNAs, some of which act in combination to determine global outcomes. ELAV/Hu proteins bind to AU-rich elements (ARE) in mRNAs and regulate their stability from splicing to translation, and the ubiquitous HuR protein has been implicated in cancerous cell growth. Recent work is focused on mechanistic models of how ELAV/Hu proteins increase mRNA stability and translation by repressing microRNAs (miRs) and the RNA induced silencing complex (RISC) via ARE-based ribonucleosomes that may affect global functions of mRNA regulons.

MicroRNA Target Identification-Experimental Approaches

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNA molecules of 21–23 nucleotides that control gene expression at the post-transcriptional level. They have been shown to play a vital role in a wide variety of biological processes and dysregulated expression of miRNAs is observed in many pathologies. Understanding the mechanism of action and identifying functionally important mRNA targets of a specific miRNA are essential to unravelling its biological function and to assist miRNA-based drug development. This review summarizes the current understanding of the mechanistic aspects of miRNA-mediated gene repression and focuses on the different approaches for miRNA target identification that have been proposed in recent years.

Comparative study of microRNA regulation on FOXL2 between adult-type and juvenile-type granulosa cell tumours in vitro

OBJECTIVES

Despite their distinct biology, granulosa cell tumours (GCTs) are treated similarly to other ovarian tumours. Predominantly expressed in granulosa cells, the transcription factor Forkhead Box L2 (FOXL2) is near absent in juvenile-type GCTs. This research aimed to investigate miRNAs as a mechanism of suppression of FOXL2 expression in juvenile-type GCTs.

METHODS

The miRNA abundance of two GCT cell lines COV434 and KGN was profiled using Affymetrix miRNA GeneChip arrays. Luciferase assays were used to confirm miRNA binding to the 3'UTR of FOXL2. Identified as promising candidates, the miR-17 miRNA family was targeted for knockdown with a miRNA sponge. Additionally, individual family members miR-17, miR-20b and miR-106a were knocked down using Anti-miR™ inhibitors. Subsequently, FOXL2 expression was analysed using RT-qPCR and Western blotting.

RESULTS

The profiling of COV434 and KGN cells revealed unique miRNA signatures, with COV434 expressing miR-17 family miRNAs whilst KGN expressed members of the let-7 miRNA gene family. Luciferase assays confirmed miRNA binding to FOXL2's 3'UTR. Reduction of miR-17 family miRNAs increased FOXL2 mRNA expression, however luciferase assays performed in combination with the sponge suggested this is an indirect effect. As no changes in protein were observed, we propose another miRNA is repressing the translation of FOXL2 mRNA.

CONCLUSION

Through miRNA profiling we have begun to unravel the profiles of GCTs, showing that juvenile and adult derived-cell lines are biologically distinct. By expanding on this discovery we may further elucidate the miRNA-mRNA pathways involved in GCT initiation and progression with potential for novel therapeutics for these cancers.

N6-methyl-adenosine (m6A) in RNA: an old modification with a novel epigenetic function

N⁶-methyl-adenosine (m⁶A) is one of the most common and abundant modifications on RNA molecules present in eukaryotes. However, the biological significance of m⁶A methylation remains largely unknown. Several independent lines of evidence suggest that the dynamic regulation of m⁶A may have a profound impact on gene expression regulation. The m⁶A modification is catalyzed by an unidentified methyltransferase complex containing at least one subunit methyltransferase like 3 (METTL3). m⁶A modification on messenger RNAs (mRNAs) mainly occurs in the exonic regions and 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR) as revealed by high-throughput m⁶A-seq. One significant advance in m⁶A research is the recent discovery of the first two m⁶A RNA demethylases fat mass and obesity-associated (FTO) gene and ALKBH5, which catalyze m⁶A demethylation in an α-ketoglutarate (α-KG)- and Fe²⁺-dependent manner. Recent studies in model organisms demonstrate that METTL3, FTO and ALKBH5 play important roles in many biological processes, ranging from development and metabolism to fertility. Moreover, perturbation of activities of these enzymes leads to the disturbed expression of thousands of genes at the cellular level, implicating a regulatory role of m⁶A in RNA metabolism. Given the vital roles of DNA and histone methylations in epigenetic regulation of basic life processes in mammals, the dynamic and reversible chemical m⁶A modification on RNA may also serve as a novel epigenetic marker of profound biological significances.

Antagonistic function of the RNA-binding protein HuR and miR-200b in post-transcriptional regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor-A expression and angiogenesis

HuR, also known as Elavl1, is an RNA-binding protein that regulates embryonic development, progenitor cell survival, and cell stress responses. The role of HuR in angiogenesis is not known. Using a myeloid-specific HuR knock-out mouse model (Elavl1Mø KO), we show that HuR expression in bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) is needed to maintain the expression of genes enriched in AU-rich elements and U-rich elements in the 3'-UTR. In addition, BMDMs from Elavl1Mø KO mice also showed alterations in expression of several miRNAs. Interestingly, computational analysis suggested that miR-200b, which is up-regulated in Elavl1Mø KO BMDMs, interacts with myeloid mRNAs very close to the HuR binding sites, suggesting competitive regulation of gene expression. One such mRNA encodes vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A, a major regulator of angiogenesis. Immunoprecipitation of RNA-protein complexes and luciferase reporter assays indicate that HuR antagonizes the suppressive activity of miR-200b, down-regulates miR-200b expression, and promotes VEGF-A expression. Indeed, Vegf-a and other angiogenic regulatory transcripts were down-regulated in Elavl1Mø KO BMDMs. Interestingly, tumor growth, angiogenesis, vascular sprouting, branching, and permeability were significantly attenuated in Elavl1Mø KO mice, suggesting that HuR-regulated myeloid-derived factors modulate tumor angiogenesis in trans. Zebrafish embryos injected with an elavl1 morpholino oligomer or miR-200b mimic showed angiogenesis defects in the subintestinal vein plexus, and elavl1 mRNA rescued the repressive effect of miR-200b. In addition, miR-200b and HuR morpholino oligomer suppressed the activity of a zVEGF 3'-UTR luciferase reporter construct. Together, these studies reveal an evolutionarily conserved post-transcriptional mechanism involving competitive interactions between HuR and miR-200b that controls angiogenesis.

Translational control by 3'-UTR-binding proteins

The regulation of mRNA translation is a major checkpoint in the flux of information from the transcriptome to the proteome. Critical for translational control are the trans-acting factors, RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) and small RNAs that bind to the mRNA and modify its translatability. This review summarizes the mechanisms by which RBPs regulate mRNA translation, with special focus on those binding to the 3′-untranslated region. It also discusses how recent high-throughput technologies are revealing exquisite layers of complexity and are helping to untangle translational regulation at a genome-wide scale.

Does Lin28 Antagonize miRNA-Mediated Repression by Displacing miRISC from Target mRNAs?

Lin28 is a developmentally regulated RNA-binding protein that plays important roles in diverse physiological and pathological processes including oncogenesis and brain synaptic function. These pleiotropic roles of Lin28 are mechanistically linked both to its ability to directly stimulate translation of genes involved primarily in cell growth and metabolism and to its ability to block biogenesis of a subset of miRNAs including the let-7 family of miRNAs. In the case of direct stimulation of gene expression, Lin28 binds to targeted mRNAs through recognition of Lin28-responsive elements (LREs) within mRNAs and recruits RNA helicase A (RHA) to promote translation. RHA belongs to the DEAD-box protein family of RNA helicases, which generally catalyze ATP-dependent unwinding of RNA duplexes or remodeling of ribonucleoprotein complexes (RNPs). Since any given mRNA can potentially be inhibited by miRNAs bearing complementary sequences, we hypothesize that binding of Lin28 to LREs not only nucleates the binding of multiple Lin28 molecules to the same mRNA, but also leads to remodeling of RNPs through recruitment of RHA and causes release of inhibitory miRNA-induced silencing complexes bound to the mRNA. This mode of action may contribute to Lin28-mediated stimulation of translation in both tumor and neuronal cells.

Transcriptional and translational regulation of cytokine signaling in inflammatory β-cell dysfunction and apoptosis

Disease is conventionally viewed as the chaotic inappropriate outcome of deranged tissue function resulting from aberrancies in cellular processes. Yet the patho-biology of cellular dysfunction and death encompasses a coordinated network no less sophisticated and regulated than maintenance of homeostatic balance. Cellular demise is far from passive subordination to stress but requires controlled coordination of energy-requiring activities including gene transcription and protein translation that determine the graded transition between defensive mechanisms, cell cycle regulation, dedifferentiation and ultimately to the activation of death programmes. In fact, most stressors stimulate both homeostasis and regeneration on one hand and impairment and destruction on the other, depending on the ambient circumstances. Here we illustrate this bimodal ambiguity in cell response by reviewing recent progress in our understanding of how the pancreatic β cell copes with inflammatory stress by changing gene transcription and protein translation by the differential and interconnected action of reactive oxygen and nitric oxide species, microRNAs and posttranslational protein modifications.

The mechanics of miRNA-mediated gene silencing: a look under the hood of miRISC

Since their discovery almost two decades ago, microRNAs (miRNAs) have been shown to function by post-transcriptionally regulating protein accumulation. Understanding how miRNAs silence targeted mRNAs has been the focus of intensive research. Multiple models have been proposed, with few mechanistic details having been worked out. However, the past few years have witnessed a quantum leap forward in our understanding of the molecular mechanics of miRNA-mediated gene silencing. In this review we describe recent discoveries, with an emphasis on how miRISC post-transcriptionally controls gene expression by inhibiting translation and/or initiating mRNA decay, and how trans-acting factors control miRNA action.