Practical usefulness of lymphatic and connective tissue clearance for the carcinoma of the pancreas head

Technical limitations of lymph node mapping in pancreatic cancer

AIM

The high incidence of lymphatic and peri-neural invasion in pancreatic cancer results in poor loco-regional control. Radical pancreatico-duodenectomy may achieve better loco-regional control, but is accompanied by increasing morbidity. Our hypothesis was that if intra-operative mapping of pathological lymph nodes (LN) is technically feasible in pancreatic cancer, it would allow for selective radical resection.

METHODS

In an ethically approved and statistically powered feasibility study of 72 (stopped after 20% enrollment) patients with suspected pancreatic cancer undergoing resection, we injected methylene blue dye peri- and intra-tumorally and studied its progress to identify putative 'sentinel lymph node(s)'. The Kausch-Whipple procedure (or total pancreatectomy, if required) was carried out in addition to radical LN dissection, which was evaluated histopathologically according to the Japanese criteria.

RESULTS

Over 18 months, 14/16 patients prospectively recruited underwent lymph node mapping and a mean of 20 (range 11-37) LNs per patient were harvested. Methylene blue dye injection identified blue LN(s) in 4/14 patients, none of which were positive for malignant deposits, whilst 10/14 patients had LN metastases. The commonest stations for LN metastasis were 17A or B (9/10), 8A (2/10) and 6 (3/10). The median survival for the 13 patients with cancer was 22.3 months (IQR: 10.4-30 months).

CONCLUSION

Sentinel lymph node mapping is not technically feasible in pancreatic cancer.

Surgery insight: surgical management of pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is a common malignancy of the gastrointestinal tract. The number of new cases diagnosed and the number of deaths each year are almost identical, demonstrating the particularly dismal prognosis for patients affected by this disease. Despite recent advances in the field of medical and radiation oncology, and the introduction of neoadjuvant and adjuvant regimens, surgery remains the single most important modality for the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Surgery for pancreatic cancer is widely viewed as a complex procedure associated with considerable perioperative morbidity and mortality. Many aspects of surgery for pancreatic cancer, such as the extent of resection, the value of vascular resection, the use of laparoscopy, and the importance of treatment at high-volume centers, are currently under debate. This Review describes the current status of surgical treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, and highlights the new developments in this field.

Extended Resection for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas presents a number of therapeutic challenges. Given the poor long-term outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), many surgeons have sought to improve survival via a radical or "extended" pancreatectomy which may include (a) total pancreatectomy (TP), (b) extended lymph node dissection (ELND), and (c) portal/mesenteric vascular resections. These themes of "extended" resection are addressed in this review. TP should not be performed for most cases of adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head because of the nominal incidence of lymph node involvement along the body and tail of the pancreas, the scarcity of multicentric disease, and the better management of pancreatic leaks after PD. Most studies show no difference in long-term survival and demonstrate greater postoperative morbidity after TP than after PD. Performing ELND in addition to PD is not worthwhile because most studies do not demonstrate any long-term benefits from ELND and the circumferential dissection around the mesenteric vessels required to harvest distant lymph nodes increases postoperative morbidity. Major arterial resection increases postoperative morbidity after PD and worsens long-term survival as the need for arterial resection to achieve negative resection margins indicates more aggressive disease. In contrast, portal and/or mesenteric venous resection does not increase the morbidity after PD or impact long-term survival as venous resection is often performed because of tumor location and not extent of disease. The disappointing experience with extended resections underscores the need for better adjuvant systemic strategies and the interdisciplinary care of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: T-stage, chromosome 17p allelic loss, and extended pancreaticoduodenectomy are relevant prognostic factors

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prognostic significance of different clinico-pathological and molecular factors, and to compare survival after standard and extended pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in ampulla of Vater adenocarcinoma (AVAC). There are discordant data on factors affecting prognosis, and hence therapeutic choices, in AVAC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Clinical-pathological factors were evaluated in 59 patients, subjected to PD for AVAC; in 42 subjects information on chromosome 17p and 18q allelic losses (LOH) and microsatellite instability (MSI) was also available. The association between survival and type of PD was investigated in the 25 patients operated between 1990 and 2001 (16 standard and nine extended).

RESULTS

The overall 5- and 10-year tumor-related survival rates were 46% and 33%, respectively. Sixteen patients had T-stages 1-2, 14 T-stage 3, and 29 T-stage 4 cancers. Chromosome 17p and 18q LOH were detected in 23 (55%) and 15 cases (36%), respectively, and in 12 cases (29%) coexisted. Five cases were MSI-positive (12%). At univariate analysis, poor survival was associated with cancer ulceration (P = 0.051), poor differentiation (P = 0.008), T-stage 4 (P < 0.001), nodal metastases (P = 0.004), chromosome 17p (P < 0.001) and 18q LOH (P = 0.002), and absence of MSI (P = 0.009). At multivariate analysis, only T-stage (P = 0.002) and 17p LOH (P = 0.001) were independent predictors of survival. All patients with MSI-positive cancers were long-survivors (>12 yrs), whereas only 30% of MSI-negative cancer patients survived at 5 years. Extended pancreaticoduodenectomy was associated with a 3-year disease-related survival higher than standard resection (83% vs 31%; P = 0.018).

CONCLUSION

MSI and chromosome 17p status allow to better define prognosis within ampullary cancers at the same stage. Surgery alone resulted curative in MSI-positive cancer patients, whereas it was inadequate in patients showing allelic losses, who might benefit from adjuvant therapy. In this observational study, extended PD was associated with increased survival compared to standard procedures.

Prognostic relevance of lymph node ratio following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

The presence or absence of lymph node metastases is known to be an important prognostic factor for patients with pancreatic cancer. Few studies have investigated the ratio of the number of lymph nodes harboring metastatic cancer to the total number of lymph nodes examined (lymph node ratio [LNR]) with regard to outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal cancer of the pancreas.

METHODS

Between 1995 and 2005, a total of 905 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Demographics, operative data, number of lymph nodes evaluated, number of lymph nodes with metastatic carcinoma, LNR, pathologic margin status, and long-term survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 187 (20.7%) of the 905 patients who had negative peripancreatic lymph nodes (N0), whereas 718 (79.3%) of the 905 patients had lymph node metastases (N1). The median number of lymph nodes evaluated in the N0 group was 15 versus 18 in the N1 group (P = .12). At median follow-up of 24 months, the median survival for all patients was 17.4 months, and the 5-year actuarial survival rate was 16.1%. Patients with lymph node metastases had a shorter median overall survival (16.5 months) compared with patients with negative lymph nodes (25.3 months; P = .001). Compared with the total number of lymph nodes examined or total number of lymph node metastases, LNR was the most compelling predictor of survival. As the LNR increased, median overall survival decreased (LNR = 0, 25.3 months; LNR > 0 to 0.2, 21.7 months; LNR > 0.2 to 0.4, 15.3 months; LNR > 0.4, 12.2 months; P = .001). After adjusting for other factors associated with survival, LNR remained an independent predictor of overall survival (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

After pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, LNR was one of the most powerful predictors of survival. LNR should be considered when stratifying patients in future clinical trials.

Resection of the mesopancreas (RMP): a new surgical classification of a known anatomical space

Background

Prognosis after surgical therapy for pancreatic cancer is poor and has been attributed to early lymph node involvement as well as to a strong tendency of cancer cells to infiltrate into the retropancreatic tissue and to spread along the peripancreatic neural plexuses. The objective of our study was to classify the anatomical-surgical layer of the mesopancreas and to describe the surgical principles relevant for resection of the mesopancreas (RMP). Immunohistochemical investigation of the mesopancreatic-perineural lymphogenic structures was carried out with the purpose of identifying possible routes of metastatic spread.

Methods

Resection of the mesopancreas (RMP) was performed in fresh corpses. Pancreas and mesopancreas were separated from each other and the mesopancreas was immunohistochemically investigated.

Results

The mesopancreas strains itself dorsally of the mesenteric vessels as a whitish-firm, fatty tissue-like layer. Macroscopically, in the dissected en-bloc specimens of pancreas and mesopancreas nerve plexuses were found running from the dorsal site of the pancreatic head to the mesopancreas to establish a perineural plane. Immunohistochemical examinations revealed the lymphatic vessels localized in direct vicinity of the neuronal plexuses between pancreas and mesopancreas.

Conclusion

The mesopancreas as a perineural lymphatic layer located dorsally to the pancreas and reaching beyond the mesenteric vessels has not been classified in the anatomical or surgical literature before. The aim to ensure the greatest possible distance from the retropancreatic lymphatic tissue which drains the carcinomatous focus can be achieved in patients with pancreatic cancer only by complete resection of the mesopancreas (RMP).

Systematic review and meta-analysis of standard and extended lymphadenectomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Although some retrospective studies of extended radical lymphadenectomy for pancreatic cancer have suggested a survival advantage, this is controversial.

METHODS

A literature search identified randomized controlled trials comparing extended with standard lymphadenectomy in pancreatic cancer surgery. Overall survival was analysed using hazard ratios and standard errors. Pooled estimates of overall treatment effects were calculated using a random effects model (odds ratio and 95 per cent confidence interval).

RESULTS

Of four randomized trials identified for systematic review, three were included in a meta-analysis of survival. The log hazard ratios (standard errors) for survival for the three trials were 0.36 (0.22), - 0.15 (0.17) and - 0.21 (0.15); the weighted mean log hazard ratio for survival overall was 0.93 (95 per cent confidence interval 0.77 to 1.13), revealing no significant differences between the standard and extended procedure (P = 0.480). Morbidity and mortality rates were also comparable, with a trend towards higher rates of delayed gastric emptying for extended lymphadenectomy. The number of resected lymph nodes was significantly higher in the extended lymphadenectomy groups (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The extended procedure does not benefit overall survival, and there may even be a trend towards increased morbidity. Therefore extended lymphadenectomy should be performed only within adequately powered controlled trials, if at all.

Prognostic implication of para-aortic lymph node metastasis in resectable pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

The survival curve of patients who undergo surgical resection of pancreatic cancer displays a steep decline within 1 year and a relatively slow decline thereafter. The patients with a short survival time may have identifiable clinicopathologic factors that lead to rapid relapse.

STUDY DESIGN

We analyzed clinicopathologic factors in 133 patients who underwent margin-negative pancreatoduodenectomy with extended radical lymphadenectomy for invasive ductal carcinoma of the pancreas to detect factors that could be responsible for the short survival.

RESULTS

Tumor size, invasion of the anterior pancreatic capsule, retroperitoneal invasion, portal venous invasion, major arterial invasion, and metastasis to the para-aortic lymph nodes were variables associated with survival time in univariate analysis. Metastasis to the para-aortic lymph nodes was the single independent factor with a significant association with mortality in multivariate analysis. Some 84% of the patients who had positive para-aortic lymph nodes died within 1 year, versus 46% of the patients with negative nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Although tumors that involve the para-aortic lymph nodes may technically be resectable, the expected postoperative survival time for most patients is less than 1 year. If para-aortic nodal metastasis is detected, alternative treatment strategies should be considered.

Pancreatic cancer is 'always non-resectable'

Pancreatic cancer is characterized by its very aggressive biological behavior which makes it a rapidly disseminating and deadly tumor. Due to their initial 'silent' behavior, pancreatic cancers are generally diagnosed too late and at that point surgical or medical interventions are futile. The outcome of pancreatic cancer has not improved over the last decades. It is evident that only very few pancreatic cancers are potentially resectable and curable, but many times even these small cancers have poor prognostic factors. Furthermore, upon surgery many of the patients considered preoperatively to have resectable tumors are found to have non-resectable disease. The problem of pancreatic cancer is further compounded by the fact that most tumors are diagnosed in elderly, frail or chronically ill patients, which makes them poor surgical candidates, and only half or fewer of these patients can undergo surgery. The stress of surgery is poorly tolerated by many patients who either die, develop complications or are then unable to receive adjuvant chemotherapy. The bottom line is that pancreatic cancer is a very aggressive tumor. Currently, most cancers are treated by non-surgical methods, and the very few patients with tumors which are potentially resectable should be operated on in specialized, high-volume pancreatic centers.

Indications and techniques of extended resection for pancreatic cancer

INTRODUCTION

The resectability rate and postoperative survival rate for pancreatic carcinoma are poor. Aggressive resection including vascular resection and extended lymphadenectomy represent one strategy for improving survival. This study was carried out to clarify the indications for extended resection, especially vascular resection, for pancreatic carcinoma.

METHODS

From July 1981 to March 2005, we performed curative resection in 289 of 443 patients with pancreatic carcinoma in our department (65.2%). Vascular resection was performed in 201 (69.5%) patients and portal vein resection without arterial resection in 186 patients. Combined portal and arterial resection was performed in 14 patients and arterial resection without portal vein resection in 1. Extended lymphadenectomy including paraaortic lymph nodes was done. The postoperative survival rate was stratified according to operative and pathology findings.

RESULTS

Operative mortality (any death within 30 days after surgery) occurred in 11 of the 289 curative resection patients (3.8%), including 1 of 88 patients without vascular resection (1.1%), 5 of 186 portal vein resection patients without arterial resection (2.7%), and 5 of 14 (35.7%) arterial resection patients undergoing portal vein arterial resection as well. Most patients who survived for 2 to 3 years had carcinoma-free surgical margins.

CONCLUSIONS

The most important indication for vascular resection in patients with pancreatic cancer is the ability to obtain cancer-free surgical margins. Otherwise, vascular resection is contraindicated. Extended lymphadenectomy may be not of benefit.

Clinical implications of combined portal vein resection as a palliative procedure in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The clinical implications of combined portal vein resections are controversial.

METHODS

One-hundred and forty-nine consecutive patients underwent macroscopically curative pancreatectomies for pancreatic head carcinoma between January 1, 1996 and December 31, 2004. Portal vein resection was performed in 86 patients (58%). Data on surgical mortality, morbidity, perioperative outcome, pathological factors, initial recurrence site, and survival were retrospectively compared between the patients with and without portal vein resection.

RESULTS

The incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula was lower among patients who underwent portal vein resection. The median survival period was 14 months for the portal vein resection group and 35 months for the non-portal vein resection group, respectively. Combined portal vein resection was a significant predictor of poor survival using a multivariate analysis. Portal vein resection was strongly associated with larger tumor size, the degree of retropancreatic tissue invasion, the presence of extrapancreatic nerve plexus invasion, lymph node metastases, and positive cancer infiltration at the surgical margins.

CONCLUSIONS

Portal vein resection at the time of pancreaticoduodenectomy can be safely performed. However, most of patients requiring portal vein resection do not achieve a potentially curative resection or a favorable survival term. As a result, the aggressive application and the strict selection of portal vein resection might reduce the incidence of positive surgical margins, enabling long-term survival in patients who do not require portal vein resection.

Recent randomized controlled trials in pancreaticoduodenectomy

OBJECTIVES

To analyze and summarize the recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

METHODS

A MEDLINE search was performed to identify prospective RCTs on PD published during the last decade. Eligible RCTs were analyzed using the following items: publication year, geographical area, study theme, sample size, and multicenter study. Moreover, the quality of each RCT was evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirty-four articles were eligible for review. One to 6 RCTs have been carried out annually during the recent 10 years. Geographically, 15 trials were performed in Europe, 10 trials in North America, and 9 in Asia. Studies concerning postoperative complications in the early postoperative period such as pancreatic fistula and delayed gastric emptying have been most frequent. Randomized controlled trials comparing anastomotic procedures for the remnant pancreas, standard PD versus PD with extended lymphadenectomy, and PD versus pylorus-preserving PD follow in descending order. The average sample size has been 117, and 10 RCTs had sample size less than 50. The rate of multicenter studies among all RCTs is 21%, with the rate in the most recent 5 years having increased 2-fold compared with that in the earlier period. Concerning the quality of RCTs, calculation of sample size was described in only 14 RCTs and intention to treat analysis was performed in 26 RCTs.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reviewed 34 RCTs on PD performed all over the world. Although the quality of every RCT was not satisfactory, high-grade evidence obtained by these RCTs should be applied in clinical settings to improve surgical quality and quality of life for each patient.

Quality of life after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head

BACKGROUND

This study examined quality of life (QoL) after classical partial pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPD) and pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head, and also evaluated the influence of extended lymphadenectomy (ELA).

METHODS

Between January 1993 and March 2004, QoL was analysed in a prospective single-centre study that included 91 patients. Thirty-four patients underwent PPD and 57 had a PPPD. Seventy patients had an ELA and 21 underwent regional lymphadenectomy (RLA). QoL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 questionnaire and a pancreatic cancer-specific module. Data were collected before operation and for 24 months after surgery.

RESULTS

The overall 5-year survival rate was 18 percent for all patients and 21 percent in those who had an R0 resection. QoL was impaired for 3-6 months after surgery and then recovered to preoperative levels. There was no significant difference in long-term survival after PPD versus PPPD and ELA versus RLA. Patients who had ELA reported clinically significant higher levels of diarrhoea and pain. PPPD showed a disadvantage in terms of pain.

CONCLUSION

The surgical techniques of resection and reconstruction did not affect QoL, but extended lymphadenectomy was associated with an impairment in QoL.

Oncological problems in pancreatic cancer surgery

Despite the development of more sophisticated diagnostic techniques, pancreatic carcinoma has not yet been detected in the early stage. Surgical resection provides the only chance for cure or long-term survival. The resection rate has increased due to recent advances in surgical techniques and the application of extensive surgery. However, the postoperative prognosis has been poor due to commonly occurring liver metastasis, local recurrence and peritoneal dissemination. Recent molecular-biological studies have clarified occult metastasis, micrometastasis and systemic disease in pancreatic cancer. Several oncological problems in pancreatic cancer surgery are discussed in the present review.

Patterns of recurrence after curative resection of pancreatic cancer, based on autopsy findings

The autopsy findings of patients who died of recurrence after curative resection of pancreatic cancer may afford a reliable guide to increase long-term survival after surgery. Recurrence patterns were analyzed for 27 autopsied patients who had undergone potentially curative resection of pancreatic cancer. The pattern of recurrence was classified as follows: (1) local recurrence, (2) hepatic metastasis, (3) peritoneal dissemination, (4) para-aortic lymph node metastasis, and (5) distant metastasis not including hepatic metastasis, peritoneal dissemination, and para-aortic lymph node metastasis. Of the 27 autopsied patients, recurrence was confirmed for 22 of 24 patients, except for three who died of early postoperative complications. Eighteen (75%) of the 24 patients had local recurrence, 12 (50%) had hepatic metastasis, and 11 (46%) had both. For four patients, local recurrence confirmed by autopsy was undetectable by computed tomography, because the recurrent lesions had infiltrated without forming a tumor mass. Peritoneal dissemination, para-aortic lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis were found for eight (33%), five (21%), and 18 (75%) of the cases, respectively. Twenty patients died of cancer, but local recurrence was judged to be the direct cause of death of only four. Local recurrence frequently occurs, but is rarely a direct cause of death, and most patients died of metastatic disease. Therefore, treatment that focuses on local control cannot improve the survival of patients with resectable pancreatic cancer, and thus, treatment regimens that are effective against systemic metastasis are needed.

Does postoperative chemotherapy have a survival benefit for patients with pancreatic cancer?

In our study, we investigated whether postoperative chemotherapy improved survival in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the pancreas. Between 1987 and 2004, 111 patients underwent pancreatic resection against invasive ductal carcinoma of the pancreas in Wakayama Medical University Hospital. Median survival time (MST) was 19.4 months, 8.6 months, and 7.2 months, in JPS Stage III (UICC Stage IIA and IIB), JPS Stage IVa (UICC Stage IIA and IIB), and JPS Stage IVb (UICC Stage IV), respectively (P < 0.01). The MST of the chemotherapy group was 12 months, and the MST of the non-chemotherapy group was 8.4 months (P < 0.05). Moreover, in JPS Stage IV (UICC Stage IIA, IIB, III, and IV) highly advanced pancreatic cancer, the MST of the chemotherapy group was 10.9 months, and the MST of the group without chemotherapy was 6.6 months (P < 0.01). Since pancreatic cancer is characterized by an aggressive tumor with a high recurrent rate, postoperative chemotherapy is effective for an improvement of survival.

Distribution of lymphatic vessels in the neural plexuses surrounding the superior mesenteric artery

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether lymphatic vessels exist in the neural plexuses surrounding the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and the ultrastructural relationship between neural plexuses and lymphatic vessels.

METHODS

A total of 970 serial sections including the structure surrounding the SMA were obtained from 9 cadavers. They were subjected to conventional hematoxylin/eosin staining and immunostaining for the lymphatic marker D2-40. Epithelial membrane antigen and S100 were also immunostained to identify the perineurium and nerve bundles, respectively.

RESULTS

Thin-walled, erythrocyte-free vessels staining with lymphatic markers (D2-40) were found in the neural plexuses surrounding the SMA along a full circumference. There seemed to be a distribution correlation between lymphatic vessels and neural plexuses. Lymphatic vessels were not identified within the nerve bundles. The plexuses contained no lymph nodes in any sections.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge we report the immunohistochemical visualization of lymphatic vessels in peri-SMA neural plexuses for the first time. Therefore, particular attention should be paid to the lymphatic vessels within neural plexuses as a possible route of invasion and the source of pancreatic cancer recurrence.

A prospective randomized trial comparing standard pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy in resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

To compare operative morbidity, mortality, quality of life, and survival after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) versus pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy (PD/ELND) in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

From May 1997 to July 2003 there were 132 patients with biopsy examination-proven or suspected adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head who agreed to participate in a single-institution, prospective, randomized trial. If resectable at operation, patients then were randomized to standard PD (40 patients) or PD/ELND (39 patients). Quality of life was assessed by using the Functional Assessment of Response to Cancer Therapy specific to the pancreas. Morbidity, mortality, and survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

Demographics and pathologic characteristics for both groups were similar. When comparing PD/ELND with standard PD, the median operating time was greater for the PD/ELND group (7.6 h vs 6.2 h, P < .01), blood transfusion more likely (44% vs 22%, P < .05), and the median number of lymph nodes resected was greater (36 vs 15 nodes, P < .01). Morbidity and mortality rates were comparable. Median durations of stay were 11 and 10.5 days (P = NS), respectively. There were no significant differences in 1-year (71% vs 82%), 3-year (25% vs 41%), 5-year (16.5% vs 16.4%), and median (19 vs 26 mo) survival (P = .32). At 4 months postoperatively, diarrhea, body appearance, and bowel control scored lower on the Functional Assessment of Response to Cancer Therapy specific to the pancreas after PD/ELND (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although a much larger study would have more power to compare statistically the survival between groups, both the decrement in quality of life and similar studies showing no survival difference make PD/ELND unattractive for further prospective investigation.

A prospective randomized trial comparing standard pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy in resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

To compare operative morbidity, mortality, quality of life, and survival after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) versus pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy (PD/ELND) in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

From May 1997 to July 2003 there were 132 patients with biopsy examination-proven or suspected adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head who agreed to participate in a single-institution, prospective, randomized trial. If resectable at operation, patients then were randomized to standard PD (40 patients) or PD/ELND (39 patients). Quality of life was assessed by using the Functional Assessment of Response to Cancer Therapy specific to the pancreas. Morbidity, mortality, and survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

Demographics and pathologic characteristics for both groups were similar. When comparing PD/ELND with standard PD, the median operating time was greater for the PD/ELND group (7.6 h vs 6.2 h, P < .01), blood transfusion more likely (44% vs 22%, P < .05), and the median number of lymph nodes resected was greater (36 vs 15 nodes, P < .01). Morbidity and mortality rates were comparable. Median durations of stay were 11 and 10.5 days (P = NS), respectively. There were no significant differences in 1-year (71% vs 82%), 3-year (25% vs 41%), 5-year (16.5% vs 16.4%), and median (19 vs 26 mo) survival (P = .32). At 4 months postoperatively, diarrhea, body appearance, and bowel control scored lower on the Functional Assessment of Response to Cancer Therapy specific to the pancreas after PD/ELND (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although a much larger study would have more power to compare statistically the survival between groups, both the decrement in quality of life and similar studies showing no survival difference make PD/ELND unattractive for further prospective investigation.

Definition of elective lymphatic target volume in ductal carcinoma of the pancreatic head based on histopathologic analysis

PURPOSE

In chemoradiation for pancreatic carcinoma three-dimensional target volume definitions could maximize tolerability and therapeutic effect at the same time because toxicity correlates with treatment volume. We aimed to define guidelines for elective treatment of nodal areas based on pathologic nodal involvement to optimize treatment volume for this tumor.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Pathologic patterns of regional nodal spread in 175 patients who underwent primary pancreatoduodenectomy with > or =10 assessed nodes and literature data on para-aortic spread were the base of the definition of the target volume. Significant correlations between spread to lymphatic areas and tumor characteristics were determined using Fisher's exact test. Computed tomography scans and a Pinnacle3 (Philips, Best, The Netherlands) system were used for treatment planning.

RESULTS

Among 175 resected tumors without pretreatment, 76% had regional nodal metastasis and 22% had spread to distant nodes. High-risk lymphatic areas were identified and selected for elective treatment. A standardized planning procedure was derived and tested under treatment conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Histopathologic data allowed us to develop recommendations for standardized treatment planning for ductal carcinoma of the pancreatic head. These are proposed for quality assurance in multicenter studies and routine use.

Imaging evaluation of post pancreatic surgery

The role of several imaging techniques in patients submitted to pancreatic surgery with special emphasis to single-slice helical computed tomography (CT) and multidetector-row CT (MDCT) was reviewed. Several surgical options may be performed such as Whipple procedure, distal pancreatectomy, central pancreatectomy, and total pancreatectomy. Ultrasound examination may be used to detect peritoneal fluid in the early post-operative period as well as lesion recurrence in long-term follow-up. Radiological gastrointestinal studies has a major role in evaluation of intestinal functionality. In spite of the advent of other imaging modalities, CT is the most effective after pancreatic surgery. On post-operative CT, the most common findings were small fluid peritoneal or pancreatic collections, stranding of the mesenteric fat with perivascular cuffing, reactive adenopathy and pneumobilia. In addition, CT may demonstrate early (leakage of anastomosis, pancreatico-jejunal fistula, haemorrage, acute pancreatitis of the remnant pancreas, peritonitis), and late (chronic fistula, abscess, aneurysms, anastomotic bilio-digestive stenosis, perianastomotic ulcers, biloma, and intra-abdominal bleeding) surgical complications. In the follow-up evaluation, CT may show tumor recurrence, liver and lymph nodes metastasis. Magnetic resonance may be used as alternative imaging modality to CT, when renal insufficiency or contrast sensitivity prevents the use of iodinated i.v. contrast material or when the biliary tree study is primarily requested. The knowledge of the type of surgical procedures, the proper identification of the anastomoses as well as the normal post-operative imaging appearances are essential for an accurate detection of the complications and recurrent disease.

Intraoperative radiotherapy for patients with carcinoma of the pancreas

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Local recurrence is one of the most common sites of failure after resection of exocrine pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) involves delivery of high doses of irradiation to the pancreas in patients with locally advanced disease, and to the surgical bed following pancreatic resection while uninvolved and dose-limiting tissues are displaced. Here we report our current experience with IORT in patients with pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

IORT was given as adjuvant treatment in 18 and palliatively in 37 patients. External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) was in addition delivered to 10 patients in the resection group and 29 in the palliation group. The cancer diagnosis was verified histologically and/or cytologically in all patients.

RESULTS

There was no hospital mortality. Among the resected patients the postoperative complication rate was 44% (8/18). The corresponding figure after palliative operation was 14% (5/37). None of the postoperative complications were regarded as a consequence of IORT. Symptoms and complaints were observed after EBRT in 70 and 90%, respectively, in the two groups. However, no symptom was serious in nature. After resection the median survival time was 9 months (range 3-58) and local recurrence was diagnosed in 33% (6/18). In the palliatively treated patients the median survival was 7 months (range 2-30) and pain requiring opioids was present in 89% (24/27) of the patients within 6 months.

CONCLUSION

In this nonrandomized study no apparent beneficial effects were seen after IORT in patients with pancreatic cancer, neither adjuvantly nor palliatively. However, radiotherapy did not lead to any major complications.

Feasibility and efficacy of combination therapy with preoperative and postoperative chemoradiation, extended pancreatectomy, and postoperative liver perfusion chemotherapy for locally advanced cancers of the pancreatic head

BACKGROUND

The outcome after resection of advanced pancreatic cancers is extremely poor because of the high incidence of the postoperative development of liver metastasis and local recurrence. We performed a combination of chemoradiation and liver perfusion chemotherapy and extended pancreatectomy.

METHODS

Nineteen patients with T3 pancreatic head cancers were enrolled. A total of 24 Gy in 12 fractions of 10-MV x-rays with a concurrent intravenous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; 3 g/12 days) was administered to the pancreatic head area. An extended pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed, and catheters were placed into the gastroduodenal artery and the superior mesenteric vein. During the first 28 postoperative days, 5-FU was continuously infused via the hepatic artery and portal vein (3.5 g/28 days x 2). Finally, 36 Gy in 18 fractions with 5-FU (3 g/6 days) was applied to the pancreatic bed.

RESULTS

After preoperative chemoradiation, four patients did not undergo surgical resection because of distant metastases. Fifteen patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, liver perfusion chemotherapy, and postoperative chemoradiation. No patient developed grade 3 toxicity as a result of preoperative chemoradiation, but one patient (7%) developed grade 3 leukopenia during the postoperative treatments. The morbidity rate was 20% (3 of 15 patients), and the mortality rate was 0%. The overall 3-year survival rate was 53%. The 3-year disease-free survival rate was 66% in patients who pathologically responded well (>50%), versus 0% in patients with poor responses (P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of preoperative and postoperative chemoradiation plus postoperative liver perfusion chemotherapy with an extended pancreatectomy is feasible, and the long-term outcomes are also promising.

Extended radical operation of pancreatic head cancer: appraisal of its clinical significance

AIM

To evaluate the significance of extended radical operation and its indications.

METHODS

Between January 1995 and December 1998, 56 inpatients with pancreatic head cancer received operation. Among them 35 patients (group 1) experienced the Whipple operation, and 21 patients (group 2) received the extended radical operation. The 1-, 2-, 3-year cumulative survival rates were used to evaluate the efficacy of the two operative procedures. Clinical stage (CS) was assessed retrospectively with the help of CT. The indications for extended radical operation were discussed.

RESULTS

There was no difference in hospital mortality and morbidity rates. Whereas the 1-, 2-, 3-year cumulative survival rates were 84.8%, 62.8%, 39.9% in the extended radical operation group, and were 70.8%, 47.6%, 17.2% in the Whipple operation group, there was a significant difference between the two groups (P<0.001, P<0.001, P<0.001, respectively). Most of the deaths within 3 years after operation were due to recurrence in the two groups. However, the 1-, 2-, 3-year cumulative rates of death due to local recurrence were decreased from 37.4% in patients that received the Whipple procedure to 23.8% in those who received by extended radical operation. Patients who survived for more than 3 years were only noted in those with CS1 in the Whipple procedure group and were founded in cases with CS1, CS2 and part of CS3 in the extended radical operation group.

CONCLUSION

The extended radical operation appears to benefit patients with pancreatic head carcinoma which was indicated in CS1, CS2 and part of CS3 without severe invasion.

Does anyone survive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma? A nationwide study re-evaluating the data of the Finnish Cancer Registry

BACKGROUND

Worldwide survival data for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas are the lowest among the 60 most frequent types of organ cancers. Hence published data on long time survivors of this disease are controversial. We performed a nationwide study comprising all Finnish patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in the period 1990-1996 who survived for at least five years after diagnosis.

METHODS

Data on patients registered as five year survivors of pancreatic cancer were obtained from the Finnish Cancer Registry and Statistics Finland. Slides or paraffin blocks were collected from patients recorded as having histologically proven pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and were re-evaluated in a double blind fashion by three pathologists with special expertise in pancreatic pathology.

RESULTS

Between 1990 and 1996, the Finnish Cancer Registry recorded 4922 pancreatic cancer patients, 89 of whom survived for at least five years. Reviewing this series of patients revealed 45 (49%) non-PDACs and 18 cases without histological verification. In 26 patients recorded as having histologically proven PDAC, re-evaluation of histological specimens confirmed PDAC in only 10 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that (1) the prognosis of PDAC remains poor and (2) careful histopathological review of all patients with pancreatic cancer is mandatory if survival data are to be meaningful.

The role of splenomesenteric vein anastomosis after division of the splenic vein in pancreatoduodenectomy

Division of the splenic vein was performed in 29 patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy to achieve lymph node dissection and neural resection around the superior mesenteric artery. The basic protocol for the splenic vein reconstruction to reduce congestion of the spleen and stomach is as follows. When the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) drained into the splenic vein, the confluence was preserved without reconstruction of the splenic vein. When the IMV drained into the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) or the splenomesenteric angle, the division of the IMV and spleno-IMV anastomosis were performed. In postoperative venography, nine patients showed downward flow (from the splenic vein to the IMV) and three patients showed upward flow (from the IMV to the splenic vein). Postoperative computed tomography scans showed venous dilatation and splenomegaly in the upward flow group; there were no patients in the downward flow group. In selected patients, splenic vein reconstruction is necessary to reduce congestion of the spleen and stomach. When the flow is downward, spleno-IMV flow should be preserved. When the flow is upward, spleno-SMV anastomosis is necessary instead of spleno-IMV anastomosis.

Value of regional lymphadenectomy in pancreatic cancer

Radical surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy are the goal standard to attempt significant long term survival in patients suffering from ductal pancreatic cancer. The role of extended lymph-node dissection is still a debated issue. In this paper a deep review of the experiences reported in the literature is carried out. Several studies are limited, not randomized and retrospective: generally speaking they seem to suggest a positive role in node dissection. Unfortunately, this trend is not confirmed in the only two trials conducted in a prospective and randomized setting. Moreover the results of these studies are also difficult to compare. At the moment we can say that extended lymphadenectomy does not play a determinant role for long term survival but a positive trend has been shown for node positive patients.

The role of extended resection in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: is there good evidence-based justification?

Thus far, there are no studies concerning the radicality of pancreaticoduodenectomy which, in well-performed, randomized-controlled trials employing high standards of evidence-based medicine, show a benefit over extended lymphadenectomy. The results of the only two prospective randomized studies are not comparable and both are underpowered (level of evidence Ib). Therefore, it is still unclear whether extended lymphadenectomy for pancreatic carcinoma improves outcome. Only one study suggests a positive tendency toward increased survival rates in node-positive patients. Extended approaches including additional venous resection can be performed without a rise in the morbidity and mortality rates of patients with pancreatic carcinoma. In the future appropriately powered randomized trials of standard vs. extended resections may show the benefit of extended surgical resections. In addition, well powered trials of postoperative adjuvant therapies or preoperative neoadjuvant strategies together with surgical resections may identify more effective combinations showing a survival benefit in patients with pancreatic carcinoma.

Survival after surgical management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: does curative and radical surgery truly exist?

Surgery for pancreatic cancer offers a low success rate but it provides the only likelihood of cure. Modern series show that, in experienced hands, the standard Whipple procedure is associated with a 5-year survival of 10%-20%, with a perioperative mortality rate of less than 5%. Most patients, however, will develop recurrent disease within 2 years after curative treatment. This occurs, usually, either at the site of resection or in the liver. This suggests the presence of micrometastases at the time of operation. Negative lymph nodes are the strongest predictor for long-term survival. Other predictors for a favourable outcome are tumour size, radical surgery and a histopathologically well-differentiated tumour. Adjuvant therapy has, so far, shown only modest results, with 5FU chemotherapy, to date, the only proven agent able to increase survival. Nowadays, the choice of therapy should be based on histopathological assessment of the tumour. Knowledge of the molecular basis of pancreatic cancer has led to various discoveries concerning its character and type. Well-known examples of genetic mutations in adenocarcinoma of the pancreas are k-ras, p53, p16, DPC4. Use of molecular diagnostics and markers in the assessment of tumour biology may, in future, reveal important subtypes of this type of tumour and may possibly predict the response to adjuvant therapy. Defining the subtypes of pancreatic cancer will, hopefully, lead to target-specific, less toxic and finally more effective therapies. Long-term survival is observed in only a very small group of patients, contradicting the published actuarial survival rates of 10%-45%. Assessment of clinical benefit from surgery and adjuvant therapy should, therefore, not only be based on actuarial survival but also on progression-free survival, actual survival, median survival and quality of life (QOL) indicators. Survival in surgical series is usually calculated by actuarial methods. If there is no information on the total number of patients and the number of actual survivors, and no clear definition of the subset of patients, actuarial survival curves can prove to be misleading. Proper assessment of QOL after surgery and adjuvant therapy is of the utmost importance, as improvements in survival rates have, so far, proved to be disappointing.

Extended radical resection versus standard resection for pancreatic cancer: the rationale for extended radical resection

OBJECTIVES

This clinical study was carried out to clarify the indications for extended radical resection for pancreatic carcinoma.

METHODS

From July 1981 to September 2003, 250 of 391 (63.9%) patients with pancreatic carcinoma underwent tumor resection in our department. Portal vein resection was performed in 171 of these 250 (68.4%) resected cases. The postoperative survival rate was studied using the operative and histologic findings.

RESULTS

Most of the patients who survived for 2 or 3 years were in the carcinoma-free surgical margins group.

CONCLUSION

The most important indication for an extended radical resection combined with portal vein resection for pancreatic cancer is the ability to obtain surgical cancer-free margins. There is no indication for an extended resection in patients in whom the surgical margins will become cancer positive if such an operation is employed.

Predicting resectability of periampullary cancer with three-dimensional computed tomography

The radiographic assessment of extent of tumor burden and local vascular invasion appears to be enhanced with three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of preoperative 3D-CT in determining the resectability of patients with periampullary tumors. Intraoperative findings from exploratory laparotomy were gathered prospectively from 140 patients who were thought to have periampullary tumors and were deemed resectable after undergoing preoperative 3D-CT imaging. CT findings were compared to intraoperative findings, and the accuracy of 3D-CT in predicting tumor resectability and, ultimately, the likelihood of obtaining a margin-negative resection were assessed. Of the 140 patients who were thought to have resectable periampullary tumors after preoperative 3D-CT, 115 (82%) were subsequently determined to have periampullary cancer. The remaining 25 patients had benign disease. Among the patients with periampullary cancer, the extent of local tumor burden involving the pancreas and peripancreatic tissues was accurately depicted by 3D-CT in 93% of the patients. 3D-CT was 95% accurate in determining cancer invasion of the superior mesenteric vessels. Preoperative 3D-CT accurately predicted periampullary cancer resectability and a margin-negative resection in 98% and 86% of patients, respectively. For patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n=85), preoperative 3D-CT resulted in a resectability rate and a margin-negative resection rate of 79% and 73%, respectively. The ability of 3D-CT to predict a margin-negative resection for periampullary cancer, including pancreatic adenocarcinoma, relies on its enhanced assessment of the extent of local tumor burden and involvement of the mesenteric vascular anatomy.

Risk factors influencing recurrence following resection of pancreatic head cancer

AIM

Whether operative procedure is a risk factor influencing recurrence following resection of carcinoma in the head of pancreas or not remains controversies. In this text we compared the recurrence rate of two operative procedure: the Whipple procedure and extended radical operation, and inquired into the factors influencing recurrence after radical resection.

METHODS

From January 1995 to December 1998, 35 cases of carcinoma of pancreas underwent the Whipple operadure, 21 patients received the Extended radical operation. All patients were followed up for more than 3 years. Prognostic factors included operative procedure, size of tumor, lymph node, interstitial invasion.

RESULTS

Deaths duo to recurrence within 3 years after operation were studied. The death rate was 51.4% in the Whipple procedure and 42.9% in the Extended radical operative procedure. There was a significant difference between the two groups. Recurrence occurred in 75% patients with tumor large than 4 cm, in 87.5% patients with lymph node involvement, and in 50% patients with the presence of interstitial invasion.

CONCLUSION

Tumor exceeding 4 cm, lymph node involvement, and presence of interstitial invasion are high risk factors of recurrence after Whipple's procedure and extended radical operation.

Risk factors for complications after pancreatic head resection

BACKGROUND

Postoperative morbidity is high after pancreatic head resections. Data about risk factors are controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for complications after pancreatic head resection and to assess whether the complication rate changed during the study period.

METHODS

Data of 301 patients undergoing pancreatic head resection were recorded prospectively. Risk factors were assessed by multivariate analysis. The first and second part of the study period were compared.

RESULTS

Mortality was 3%. Overall and surgery-related complications occurred in 42% and 28%, respectively. Independent risk factors for postoperative morbidity were impaired renal function (odds ratio [OR] 2.7), absence of preoperative biliary drainage (OR 1.9), and resection of other organs (OR 3.2). Complication rate, duration of surgery, amount of blood transfused, and length of hospital stay decreased during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing hospital experience decreased complication rates. Patients with risk factors should be considered for transferal to specialized centers.

Long-term follow-up of patients with clinically indeterminate suspicion of pancreatic cancer and normal EUS

BACKGROUND

EUS often is performed because of a clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer when the results of other noninvasive diagnostic tests are indeterminate. The aim of this study was to determine the true negative predictive value of a normal EUS in a cohort of patients with an indeterminate suspicion of pancreatic cancer by obtaining long-term follow-up information.

METHODS

Patients referred for EUS of the pancreas for the following indications were identified: elevated carbohydrate-associated antigen (CA 19-9) without other definitive evidence of pancreatic cancer, subtle abnormalities on CT of the pancreas, and unexplained abdominal pain and/or weight loss. Endoscopy procedure reports, as well as inpatient and outpatient records were obtained. In addition, referring physicians, as well as patients, were contacted to acquire adequate follow-up information.

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients were included in the study. Follow-up of at least 6 months was obtained for 76 (95%) patients (mean follow-up 23.9 months). No patient with a normal EUS of the pancreas developed pancreatic cancer or required pancreatic surgery during the follow-up period. One patient in whom a diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis was made by EUS subsequently was found to have pancreatic cancer at surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

A normal EUS of the pancreas in the setting of subtle radiologic findings, serologic abnormalities, and/or nonspecific symptoms definitively rules out the presence of pancreatic cancer.

Postoperative cytology for drained fluid from the pancreatic bed after "curative" resection of pancreatic cancers: does it predict both the patient's prognosis and the site of cancer recurrence?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the postoperative cytology of drained fluid from the pancreatic bed as a predictive indicator of local recurrence after curative (R0) resection of pancreatic cancer.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The pancreatic bed offers a common site of cancer recurrence (local recurrence), even after curative (R0) resection is performed for pancreatic cancer. If local recurrence is thereby predicted precisely, soon after surgery, we have a chance to treat it by adding radiation or some other locoregional therapy before it can grow or spread beyond the pancreatic bed. However, there have been no previous reports of cytology performed on the drained fluid after pancreatectomy.

METHODS

This study includes 94 patients who had shown negative results in the peritoneal washing cytology before resection and subsequently received pancreatectomies for pancreatic tumors. They consisted of 12 benign tumors, 17 noninvasive or minimally invasive carcinomas and 65 invasive ductal carcinomas (R0 = 58; R1/2 = 7). Postoperatively, the drained fluid from the pancreatic bed was collected for 24 hours and used for cytologic examination. The cytologic results were examined in association with the histopathology of the resected tumor, patient's survival, and mode of cancer recurrence, including local recurrence.

RESULTS

Patients with benign tumors or noninvasive/minimally invasive carcinomas had negative result in cytology, and none of them have died of local recurrence (limited to the pancreatic bed) to date. However, patients with invasive ductal carcinoma revealed higher cytology-positive rates: 28% (16/58) in curative (R0) resection; and 71% (5/7) in noncurative (R1/2) resection. Among 58 patients with R0 resection, the 3-year survival rate was 14% in 16 cytology-positive patients and 55% in 42 cytology-negative patients (P < 0.05). The 3-year cumulative rate of local recurrence was 85% and 23%, respectively (P < 0.05). Compared with other histopathologic parameters obtained from the resected specimens, the drain cytology was more specific in predicting the subsequent development of local recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Drain-cytology was a quick examination that enabled us to specifically indicate both minute residual cancer and subsequent development of local recurrence even after R0 resection of pancreatic cancer.

Implication of micrometastases of lymph nodes in patients with extended operation for pancreatic cancer

INTRODUCTION

Accurate evaluation of lymph node metastases is very important in planning treatment for pancreatic cancer.

AIM

To detect micrometastases in lymph nodes dissected from patients with pancreatic cancer.

METHODOLOGY

We used cytokeratin staining of negative lymph nodes in routine hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining. We examined by cytokeratin staining 239 HE-negative nodes from 7 patients with no pathologic evidence of lymph node metastasis (n0 cases) and 718 HE-negative group 2 nodes from 23 patients with metastasis in group 1 lymph nodes (n1 cases) who underwent extended operation combined with intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT).

RESULTS

Cytokeratin staining identified 15 positive nodes among the 239 HE-negative nodes from the 7 n0 cases and 8 positive nodes among the 718 HE-negative nodes from the 23 n1 cases. Among the 7 n0 cases, 5 (71.4%) had positive n1 nodes and 2 (28.3%) also had positive n2 nodes. Among the 23 n1 cases, 4 (17.4%) had positive n2 nodes. Patients with micrometastases in n2 nodes died within 25 months.

CONCLUSION

Cytokeratin staining is very useful to evaluate the involvement of lymph nodes in pancreatic cancer. Prognosis of pancreatic cancer should be determined in conjunction with evaluation of nodal status by cytokeratin staining. Extended operation was not useful for pancreatic cancer patients with micrometastases of group 2 nodes.

Can intestinal innervation be preserved in pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer? Results of an anatomical study

Twenty dissections were carried out, in all of which the splanchnic nerves, celiac plexuses, capital pancreatic plexus and superior mesenteric plexus were identified and traced. The capital pancreatic plexus was formed from two bundles, the first taking its origin from the right celiac plexus, the second from the superior mesenteric plexus. These two bundles joined together just behind the head of the pancreas. Two preganglionic bundles, a ganglion and two postganglionic bundles composed the superior mesenteric plexus. Postganglionic bundles received fibers from both right and left celiac plexuses. In small cancers a thin layer of nervous tissue around the superior mesenteric artery might be spared in order to avoid diarrhea from intestinal denervation. This study has provided anatomical evidence that a part of the mesenteric plexus, which receives fibers from both left and right celiac plexuses, maintains a sufficient intestinal innervation.

Pancreatic cancer: preliminary experience with sodium iodide fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in Australia

Previous studies of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in pancreatic cancer have used Bismuth Germinate detector systems. This preliminary Australian study aims to confirm the accuracy of FDG-PET in pancreatic cancer using a dedicated sodium iodide (NaI) PET system. Fifteen consecutive patients underwent FDG-PET using a GE QUEST dedicated NaI PET scanner. The indications were the characterization of a pancreatic mass seen on CT or ultrasonographic imaging (nine cases), diagnosis or exclusion of recurrent disease following surgery and adjuvant therapy (four cases) and presurgical staging of primary pancreatic cancer (two cases). The final diagnosis was determined from histology or, when no histology was available, by radiological and clinical follow up. The FDG-PET accurately characterized eight out of nine pancreatic masses (seven were true negative, one was true positive and one was false positive). Of the four cases performed to determine recurrent disease, three were accurately diagnosed (two true negatives and one true positive). In the fourth case, PET accurately detected a liver metastasis but did not detect the local recurrence. Results in the two cases where PET was performed for preoperative staging comprised one true positive and one false negative. Sodium iodide FDG-PET is useful in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, particularly in the presence of a previously detected mass.

Locoregional chemotherapy for patients with pancreatic cancer intra-arterial adjuvant chemotherapy after pancreatectomy with portal vein resection

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS

The survival of pancreatic cancer patients with portal vein resection is extremely poor due to the high incidence of liver metastasis. The occurrence of liver metastasis is decreased by locoregional arterial infusion after pancreatic surgery. Chemosensitivity tests can provide the basis for individualized chemotherapy in each patient and predict the clinical response. Therefore, the current study was designed to clarify whether locoregional chemotherapy based on the results of chemosensitivity tests has the clinical effects of preventing liver metastasis and improving survival for patients with portal vein resection.

METHODOLOGY

The resected specimens from 40 of 47 patients with resection of pancreatic cancer were assessed for chemosensitivity to various anticancer drugs. Fourteen patients underwent portal vein resection due to direct invasion, and nine of these patients received intra-arterial adjuvant chemotherapy on the basis of the results of MTT assay to prevent liver metastasis. The remaining five patients received no chemotherapy.

RESULTS

None of the patients who received intra-arterial chemotherapy had liver metastasis, and this group of patients had improved survival. The mean survival of patients with intra-arterial chemotherapy was significantly longer than that of patients without chemotherapy (25.6 months with chemotherapy versus 9.4 months without chemotherapy).

CONCLUSION

A pilot study of postoperative intra-arterial chemotherapy showed the reduction of liver metastasis and improvement of survival among pancreatic cancer patients with portal vein resection.

Results of pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer: extended versus standard procedure

In Western experience, the long-term survival benefit after extended pancreaticoduodenectomy (EPD) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is still controversial. The aim of this work was to evaluate weather EPD for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma prolongs long-term survival compared to standard pancreaticoduodenectomy (SPD). From November 1992 to September 1996, we performed pancreatic resections in 30 patients affected by stage I-III pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: 13 patients underwent SPD and 17 patients underwent EPD, consecutively. The two groups of patients were similar for all the demographic, clinical, and pathological characteristics, and all the intraoperative factors considered except the number of resected lymph nodes (mean number per case = 34.2 +/- 15.5 in the EPD group versus 12.8 +/- 3.6 in the SPD group, p <0.001) and the operative time (median time per case = 375 minutes in the EPD group versus 270 minutes in the SPD group, p = 0.009). Patients in the two groups experienced a similar postoperative course. The estimated survival probability at 1 and 3 years after operation was 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49 to 0.90) and 0.24 (95% CI: 0.07 to 0.45) in the EPD group; 0.31 (95% CI: 0.09 to 0.55) and 0.08 (95% CI: 0.00 to 0.29) in the SPD group (p = 0.014). According to a Cox model, the treatment was associated with R0 patients' long-term survival (SPD versus EPD: hazard ratio (HR) = 4.82, 95% CI: 1.66 to 14.00, p = 0.004). Grading of tumor differentiation was confirmed to be a relevant prognostic factor (poor versus moderate: HR = 4.33, 95% CI: 1.49 to 12.61, p = 0.007), whereas type of resection had no significant effect (pylorus-preserving versus hemigastrectomy: HR = 1.49, 95% CI: 0.56 to 3.95, p = 0.42). The proportion of R0 patients with local recurrence was lower in the EPD group (20.0% versus 70.0%, p = 0.034).

Anti-tumor effect of N-[3,4-dimethoxycinnamoyl]-anthranilic acid (tranilast) on experimental pancreatic cancer

The anti-tumor effect of N- [3,4-dimethoxycinnamoyl] -anthranilic acid (tranilast) was examined in experimental pancreatic cancer. Proliferation of PGHAM-1 cells was inhibited by tranilast in a dose-dependent manner, showing a significant difference at a concentration of 25 microgram/ml (p<0.05). In colony formation, tranilast reduced the number of colonies at a concentration of 25 microgram/ml (p<0.01). DNA synthesis for 12 hours was attenuated dose-dependently and a significant difference was observed at concentrations of greater than 50 microgram/ml (p<0.05). From cell cycle analysis, a dose-dependent increase in the distribution of G0-G1 phase was observed. In the dorsal air sac model, the mean angiogenesis indices in PGHAM-1 chambers were 4.17 +/- 0.22 (control group) and 2.33 +/- 0.84 (treatment group), and in VEGF chambers they were 3.60 +/- 0.67 (control group) and 1.92 +/- 0.42 (treatment group), In the peritoneal dissemination model, the quantity of sanguineous ascites, the number and the size of diaphragmatic nodules and the microvessel density (MVD) of the metastatic site were reduced by tranilast significantly. In conclusion, the anti-tumor effect of tranilast on proliferation and on tumor-angiogenesis was confirmed in experimental pancreatic cancer.

Is pancreaticoduodenectomy with mesentericoportal venous resection safe and worthwhile?

BACKGROUND

Whether or not superior mesentericoportal venous resection (SM-PVR) associated with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is safe and worthwhile has not been fully confirmed. The aim of the present study was to investigate results of this surgical procedure performed for pancreatic head and periampullary neoplasms.

METHODS

As a first analysis, postoperative morbidity and mortality after PD with (n = 31) or without SM-PVR (n = 119) were investigated in 150 patients with pancreatic head and periampullary neoplasms. As a second analysis, rates of margin-negative resection and survival after SM-PVR (n = 21) and without SM-PVR (n = 66) were compared in 87 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. In these patients undergoing SM-PVR (n = 21), survival rate was investigated in patients who did (n = 13) and did not (n = 8) undergo a margin-negative resection.

RESULTS

In the first analysis, duration of surgery and volume of blood transfused perioperatively were higher in patients undergoing SM-PVR. However, mortality, morbidity rates, and mean hospital stay did not differ between patients who did undergo SM-PVR (31 patients, 3.2%, 48.4%, and 22.2 days, respectively) and who did not (119 patients, 2.5%, 47.1%, 25.9 days, respectively). No postoperative death occurred in the recent part of the present study, since 1994, in patients undergoing SM-PVR. In the second analysis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, rates of margin-negative resection and 2-year survival did not significantly differ between patients who did and did not undergo SM-PVR (62% and 22%, respectively, versus 73% and 24%). In patients undergoing SM-PVR, survival rate was significantly higher for patients undergoing a margin-negative resection (n = 13) than for patients undergoing a macroscopic or microscopic margin-positive resection (n = 8, 2-year survival = 57.1% versus 0%, P <0.05).

CONCLUSION

PD combined with SM-PVR can be performed safely. This surgical procedure is followed by a promising survival rate and can be recommended in order to obtain a margin-negative resection; however, candidates for SM-PVR should be carefully selected.

Adjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer

The outlook for patients with pancreatic cancer has been grim. There have been major advances in the surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer, leading to a dramatic reduction in post-operative mortality from the development of high volume specialized centres. This stimulated the study of adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments in pancreatic cancer including chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy. Initial protocols have been based on the original but rather small GITSG study first reported in 1985. There have been two large European trials totalling over 600 patients (EORTC and ESPAC-1) that do not support the use of chemoradiation as adjuvant therapy. A second major finding from the ESPAC-1 trial (541 patients randomized) was some but not conclusive evidence for a survival benefit associated with chemotherapy. A third major finding from the ESPAC-1 trial was that the quality of life was not affected by the use of adjuvant treatments compared to surgery alone. The ESPAC-3 trial aims to assess the definitive use of adjuvant chemotherapy in a randomized controlled trial of 990 patients.

Personal observations, opinions, and approaches to cancer of the pancreas and the periampullary area

This article reviews the diagnosis, staging, surgical, and adjuvant treatment of pancreatic and periampullary cancer based on personal experience covering 25 years. In spite of remarkable progress, especially in regard to staging and surgical treatment, the authors conclude that with the modalities currently available, timely diagnosis and definitive cure of this particular cancer is rare.